Amazing Miracles Are Happening That Are Astonishing Scientists, They Prove That Christianity Is The Only True Faith And All Other Religions Are Of The Devil

<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/st.jpeg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter wp-image-111697" height="538" sizes="(max-width: 709px) 100vw, 709px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/st.jpeg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/st.jpeg 606w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/st-300x228.jpeg 300w" width="709" /></a></p><p><strong>By Walid Shoebat (Shoebat Sunday Special)</strong></p><p>Why critical scholarly opinions abound on matters that pertain to the miraculous, especially when miracles defy science?  Why do textual critics abound hovering over ancient biblical manuscripts? And why is their main goal always attempting to refute God by using textual criticism? Science and miracles do not go hand in hand.</p><p>Try scrolling down "<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_criticism">textual criticism" on wikipedia</a> and see how you will keep scrolling down to see the scholars and critics all hone in only on the Bible. Scroll all the way till you reach the sections on textual criticism of the Quran and the Book of Mormon and what do you find? These get no attention. And the only reason these are even mentioned is because they hitch on the Bible.</p><p>Why don't these scholars switch and instead hone in on the Quran, the Book of Mormon, the Shreemad Bhagavad Gita, the Upanishads, the Veda, the Tripitakas, Baha'ism's Kitáb-i-Aqdas, Confucianism's Book of Rites the Great Learning, the Doctrine of the Mean, the Analects, the Mencius or Jainism's Agamas or Shintoism's Kojiki? Why are they 'strictly', 'only', and 'exclusively' focusing on the Holy Scripture and the miracles that convert people to become Christians?</p><p>The wise instead of knowing all the answers to shut-up the critics, needs to learn how to simply ask these right questions we just asked. Why do these focus solely on a bunch of people who sing and praise and consume a chip of wheat?</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/PrincessGraceReceivesCommunion.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-111701" height="356" sizes="(max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/PrincessGraceReceivesCommunion.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/PrincessGraceReceivesCommunion.jpg 400w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/PrincessGraceReceivesCommunion-300x267.jpg 300w" width="400" /></a></p><p>And its not just the Bible. Even when miracles happen all the way in Mexico, the hound dogs attack from within the Catholic Church itself trying to debunk the image of Our Lady of Guadalupe. This is why I smile when people use 'priestly corruption' as an argument to disprove the church.</p><p>I rarely ran across priests that I like, but in my view the more the church is infiltrated, the more proof we have that its the truth. Truth is not found by landing on a squeaky clean church. Stafford Poole, a historian and Vincentian priest in the United States began a vigorous debate which was ignited in Mexico when it emerged that <a title="Guillermo Schulenburg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guillermo_Schulenburg">Guillermo Schulenburg </a>(another bad priest) from the Basilica of Guadalupe who lived an extravagant life-style began to shed doubts that Juan Diego was a historical person. Heck, today we have many archeologists who doubt that King David even existed.</p><p>Schulenburg was supported by three of Mexico's most famous canon lawyers who asserted that evidence indicated the entire tale to be a church farce yet these didn't mind to live extravagant lifestyles off of the Virgin of Guadalupe's fame. I have met countless wealthy ministers who made fortunes from the Bethlehemite Jesus Who simply rode a donkey. Yet people follow them because they prefer a limousine over a donkey while ignoring that a donkey is a wonderful miracle made by a creator.</p><div id="attachment_111691" style="width: 525px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/c4cd242571816adb546cd9dca314b39d.jpg"><img alt="" class="wp-image-111691" height="458" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/c4cd242571816adb546cd9dca314b39d.jpg" width="515" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Mary too rode a donkey just like this one all the way to Egypt</p></div><p>And yet another scandal, erupted when the Italian journalist Andrea Tornielli published in the Italian newspaper <i><a title="Il Giornale" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Il_Giornale">Il Giornale</a></i> questioning the historicity of Juan Diego who was behind the tilma which the image miraculously formed on.</p><p>But it was the same case for the Shroud of Turin when it was first carbon-dated declaring it a 'fraud' sparking a great controversy until later on scholars still marvel at its formation with many debunking the carbon dating to also find its amazing miraculous nature to have been impossible to have been made by artists.</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/image013.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-111652" height="924" sizes="(max-width: 454px) 100vw, 454px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/image013.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/image013.jpg 454w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/image013-147x300.jpg 147w" width="454" /></a></p><p>It is always the case that such "forgeries" are finally noticed as authentic.</p><p>Likewise was the story of the image of Our Lady of Guadalupe. They said that Juan Diego whose tilma had the imprint of the Virgin Mary that he never existed until the <i>Codex Escalada </i>debunked the "no Juan Diego" theory.</p><p>The document described a woman stomping on a crescent moon and even mentioned this insignificant shepherd "Juan Diego" and was authenticated<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Escalada"> to be from the sixteenth century</a>.</p><div id="attachment_111702" style="width: 760px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/codex1548-750px.jpg"><img alt="" class="wp-image-111702 size-full" height="497" sizes="(max-width: 750px) 100vw, 750px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/codex1548-750px.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/codex1548-750px.jpg 750w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/codex1548-750px-300x199.jpg 300w" width="750" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">"principal image comprises a rocky landscape dotted with sparse scrub flanked on the left by an Indian kneeling at the foot of a mountain and facing in three-quarter profile across the plain towards the Virgin who, in turn, flanks the landscape on the right. She is contained within a nebulous mandorla, and at her feet are traces of what seems to be a horned moon. This depicts the apparition which is said to have occurred on 12 December 1531 on the hill of Tepeyac located six kilometers (four miles) north of the main plaza of Mexico City. The sun is rising over the hills behind the Virgin. Above the central landscape is the date "1548" beneath which are four lines of Nahuatl text written in the Latin alphabet which can be translated as: "In this year of 1531 there appeared to Cuauhtlatoatzin our dearly beloved mother Our Lady of Guadalupe in Mexico". Below the landscape and a little off-centre to the right, is the imposing signature of Fray Bernardino de Sahagún (ca. 1499-1590), the renowned Franciscan missionary, historian and pioneering ethnologist. High in the cliffs above the kneeling Indian is a much smaller depiction of a man on the hill. Directly beneath the kneeling Indian is more Nahuatl text written in the Latin alphabet, the first part of which can be translated as: "Cuauhtlatoatzin died a worthy death"; and the second as: "in 1548 Cuauhtlatoatzin died." From other sources, this is known to be the native name of Juan Diego."</p></div><p>Juan Diego after all did exist.</p><p>Yet around these same times while some apparition many claimed as 'demonic' was changing Mexico's savage paganism, Martin Luther's Wittenberg's edition <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://catholicharboroffaithandmorals.com/Luthers%20Own%20Statements.pdf">covered 9 pages</a> of a discussion Luther had with Lucifer and the 'scholars' could care less about his Muhammadan style encounters with the devil. Behold the Luthifer-Lucifer exchange:</p><div id="attachment_111641" style="width: 550px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/l1.jpeg"><img alt="" class="wp-image-111641" height="368" sizes="(max-width: 540px) 100vw, 540px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/l1.jpeg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/l1.jpeg 1079w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/l1-300x204.jpeg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/l1-768x523.jpeg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/l1-1024x698.jpeg 1024w" width="540" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Luthifer's conversation with the devil</p></div><p>And if papal infallibility were the issue for Luther, can the following be anything less than protestant infallibility? Following the same thread "even an angel from heaven" which Paul wrote in II Thessalonians II, Luther wrote: "even an angel from Heaven, to judge my doctrine ... I will not allow it to be judged by anybody, not even by any of the angels".</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/l2.jpeg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter wp-image-111642" height="423" sizes="(max-width: 507px) 100vw, 507px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/l2.jpeg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/l2.jpeg 831w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/l2-300x251.jpeg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/l2-768x642.jpeg 768w" width="507" /></a></p><p>Muhammad said similar things when he was questioned about his encounters with the angel of light saying: "<a class="mw-redirect" title="By Allah" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/By_Allah">by God</a> if they put the sun in my right hand and the moon in my left on condition that I abandon this course, until God has made me victorious, or I perish therein, I would not abandon it."</p><p>And while St. Mary visited Juan Diego in Mexico to stop the bloodshed, around the same time, most of southwestern Germany was in chaotic revolt. The peasants, who called on the power of Luther's teachings became violent. Historians will tell you that Luther opposed insurrection on principle, but cavalierly Luther sanctioned wholesale theft of ecclesiastical properties on the grounds that the inhabitants had forsaken the “gospel”:</p><blockquote><p>"If they are not the church but the devil’s whore that has not remained faithful to Christ, then it is irrefutably and thoroughly established that they should not possess church property." (Wider Hans Wurst, or Against Jack Sausage, p. 220)</p></blockquote><p>This type of sophist liberal zigzagging is nothing new. It is sort of like taking an official position where NATO condemns terrorism while it wrecks the whole Middle East. Officially NATO is anti-terrorism, of course, while at the same time they equip Islamist terrorists in Syria after creating havoc in Egypt, Libya and Iraq. What counts of course is the 'official' stance. The tactic is simple, create a cover and then spew whatever poison you want to cause rebellion.</p><p>But of course, the scholarly critics won't touch Luther and they will tell you that Luther simply suffered from a case of "unbridled tongue". Anabaptists who advocated non-violence and toleration only had Lutherans and Calvinists and Zwinglians torture and drown these fellow Protestants by the thousands. Persecution and capital punishment of the Anabaptists was adopted in 1529 at the Diet of Speyer — where the term “Protestant” originated — with Luther’s consent.</p><p>Were Luther's accomplishments here a miracle?</p><p>Yet miracles connected to the intercession of the Virgin Mary, which cannot possibly be explained is always accused as being the work of the devil while you find no major critics with Luther's encounter with the devil. Why?</p><p>How is it that miracles which, for all intents and purposes, draw millions to Jesus Christ Himself be of the devil when Jesus assured us that the devil will not divide against himself? Luther wasn't converting pagans. He was simply converting Catholics to revolt.</p><p>Miracles have always occurred historically, as recorded in the Bible. So did God cease to reveal Himself and He only manifests to the tele-evangelist healing ministry speaking of financial harvests that bought them the latest jet? Are these the miracles and answers to prayer? Perhaps it was the latest manifestations on speaking in tongues?</p><p><span class="embed-youtube" style="text-align:center; display: block;"><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/K_1RL8uxmeA?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&start=1909&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe></span></p><p>I can't count how many times I have seen the same full-fledged tares say that God hates religion. These mock religion by quoting: <sup class="versenum">"</sup>Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, <i>and</i> to keep himself unspotted from the world." (James 1:27).</p><p>They isolate this verse and forget that in Matthew 25 what determines the destiny of the Christian to going to heaven or hell is based on that specific "religion":</p><blockquote><p>"For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in ..." (Matthew 25:35)</p></blockquote><p>To feed the widows and orphans and the persecuted is no small matter. The ones who did not follow this "religion", He tells them:</p><blockquote><p>"Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels".</p></blockquote><p>Jesus even tells them why they are going to hell: "For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink ..."</p><p>Can one easily ignore this 'religion' and demand Jesus to send them to heaven because Luther said that once saved always saved or that they speak in tongues?</p><p>To get rid of religion, during the bloody persecutions of the Church in Mexico under the Freemason socialist <em>Plutarco Calles, </em>on November 14, 1921, a bomb was hidden in a bouquet of flowers was placed just a few feet before the image of Our Lady of Guadalupe in the basilica in Mexico City. It went off. The explosion was so severe that it demolished the marble steps of the main altar, even the windows of the nearby homes, but the fabric suffered no damage whatsoever when it was only protected by glass, the same type of glass that was blasted throughout the neighborhood.</p><p>One can even examine all the critiques in the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.statemaster.com/encyclopedia/Virgen-de-Guadalupe">Guadalupe Encyclopedia</a> and even they could not ignore this story and they cannot explain how a bomb could not effect a tilma covered by glass. One can even <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.csicop.org/sb/show/miraculous_image_of_guadalupe">examine skeptics</a> who do not deny that hemp and cactus fibers were used. These ignore the fact that all replicas of Guadalupe's image attempting to bust the miracle (just like the Shroud of Turin) ended up with miserable failures where the paint faded away few years later. It is impossible to do this type of art on this type of material.</p><p>When stories like this parallel Moses' staff showing that mankind fail the test, I am convinced its a miracle. If the Catholics are wrong about their faith, why would <em>Plutarco Calles </em>persecute the whole nation just to stop Guadalupe and the Eucharist? After all its just millions of crazy people each consuming a little insignificant cracker, right? So why all the fuss?</p><p>The key is not the ability to answer all the questions, but to ask the right wise questions.</p><p>But even besides all this controversy or even the failure to replicate the image, if this image was made by the devil, here we have the evil Plutarco Calles's terrorists, who all of the sudden was doing the work of God? Was he perhaps prevented by satan who protected the image from destruction?</p><p>But of course, mankind today loves his god, science, and if only science can prove it, then he will approve and believe. So they took Juan Diego's tilma which was examined in 1979 by Philip Callahan, (biophysicist, USDA entomologist, NASA consultant) specializing in <a class="mw-redirect" title="Infrared imaging" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_imaging">infrared imaging</a>, was allowed direct access to visually inspect, and photograph the image. He took numerous infrared photographs of the front of the tilma.</p><div id="attachment_111656" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/our-lady-of-gaud_56kb_jpg.jpg"><img alt="" class="wp-image-111656 size-full" height="400" sizes="(max-width: 290px) 100vw, 290px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/our-lady-of-gaud_56kb_jpg.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/our-lady-of-gaud_56kb_jpg.jpg 290w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/our-lady-of-gaud_56kb_jpg-218x300.jpg 218w" width="290" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The wise recognizes real beauty where innocence protrudes out of an image and speaks to the soul</p></div><p>And everything adds up. It was as was claimed made of coarse weave of palm threads called "pita" or the rough fiber called "cotense" (MC), or a <a title="Hemp" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemp">hemp</a> and linen mixture (R). It was traditionally held to be made from <i><a class="mw-redirect" title="Ixtle" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ixtle">ixtle</a>,</i> an <a title="Agave" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agave">agave</a> fiber and not expensive canvas.</p><p>Was Callahan perhaps a lying fraud sent by the minions of the devil?</p><p>Maybe then the whole Cornell University too were devils? They studied the image of the Virgin left on the rough maguey-fiber fabric of Juan Diego's tilma magnifying the iris of the Virgin's eyes 2,500 times and, through mathematical and optical procedures, they were even able to identify all the people imprinted in the eyes including Juan Diego, the man who they denied was even involved. And his photo  inside the eyes of the Virgin matched his portrait. But of course, the critics will tell you that its all imagination.</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/eyes1.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-111657" height="322" sizes="(max-width: 720px) 100vw, 720px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/eyes1.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/eyes1.jpg 720w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/eyes1-300x134.jpg 300w" width="720" /></a></p><div id="attachment_111658" style="width: 310px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/158_Juan_Diego_Portrait.jpg"><img alt="" class="wp-image-111658 size-full" height="428" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/158_Juan_Diego_Portrait.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/158_Juan_Diego_Portrait.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/158_Juan_Diego_Portrait-210x300.jpg 210w" width="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">A painting of Juan Diego looks the same as found in a microscopic size image imprinted in the eyes of the Virgin</p></div><p>The eyes of the Virgin, though the dimensions are microscopic, the iris and the pupils of the image's eyes have imprinted on them a highly detailed picture of at least 13 people who were the same people present in both the left and right eyes and in different proportions as would happen when human eyes reflect the objects before them.</p><p>The reflection transmitted by the eyes of the Virgin of Guadalupe is the scene on Dec. 9, 1531, during which Juan Diego showed his tilma, with the image, to Bishop Juan de Zumárraga and others present in the room.</p><p>This would mean that the image, like the Shroud of Turin was created in a flash.</p><p>And why would the devil choose this material? Made primarily of cactus fibers, a <em>tilma</em> had a rough surface, making it difficult enough to wear, much less to paint and scientists insist there was no technique used beforehand to treat the surface which is like silk to the touch, while the unused portion remains coarse. The technique would be impossible which only occurs in nature in the coloring of bird feathers, butterfly scales and on the elytra of brightly colored beetles.</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/C8C8.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-111673" height="480" sizes="(max-width: 624px) 100vw, 624px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/C8C8.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/C8C8.jpg 624w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/C8C8-300x231.jpg 300w" width="624" /></a></p><div id="attachment_111679" style="width: 647px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/guadalupe3-11.jpg"><img alt="" class="wp-image-111679" height="903" sizes="(max-width: 637px) 100vw, 637px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/guadalupe3-11.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/guadalupe3-11.jpg 716w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/guadalupe3-11-211x300.jpg 211w" width="637" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">O stop your complaining about icons and just look at this beauty</p></div><p>To paint such an image in the "ayate" fibers would deteriorate after 20 years, but this image is nearly five centuries old. A 1938 Nobel Prize winner in chemistry, found that the image did not even have natural animal or mineral colorings given that there were no synthetic colorings in 1531. Infrared rays discovered to their surprise no traces of any paint and the fabric had not been treated with any kind of technique.</p><p>Even the eyes when exposed to light, the pupils contract and when the light is withdrawn, they return to a dilated state. Was the devil behind Dr. Jorge Escalante Padilla, a surgical ophthalmologist who examined these reflections and also Dr. Cherney who examined the back surface of the cornea to only discover small veins on both of the eyelids of the image?</p><p>Did the devil strike the Japanese optician who was examining the eyes and fainted? Upon recovering he stated: "The eyes were alive and looking at him." [Janet Barber,  <i>Latest Scientific Findings on the Images in the Eyes</i>, page 90.]<p>Perhaps its my imagination gone wild, but a glance at the Shroud of Turin I can tell, the face imprinted one <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OneMrbCo4wU&feature=youtu.be">can easily find in Bethlehem</a> today.</p><p>I never liked any of the renderings I see attempting to make a photo from how Jesus looked like by using the shroud and I love the face on the shroud the way it appears and I can find my own relatives from Bethlehem who have resemblances (in my prejudiced view). Here is my cousin <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OneMrbCo4wU&feature=youtu.be">Musa (Moses) Shoebat </a>who is a carpenter. I'd say he looks more like Jesus than these modernized re-creations.<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/shobeat-shroud.jpeg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-111638 aligncenter" height="319" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/shobeat-shroud.jpeg" width="229" /></a><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/8.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter wp-image-111639" height="555" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/8.jpg" width="392" /></a></p><p>But this is only my assumption.</p><p>The question is, can the devil create the shroud and the image of Our Lady of Guadalupe?</p><p>Even better yet: <em>can the devil create life</em>?</p><p>Besides the pupils in Our Lady of Guadalupe's eyes, how can this same devil create a human heart which would make him a creator of life? If life is produced from such miracles, than God must be in it for the devil is the destroyer of life which only God can create.</p><p>But this is exactly the case when one eucharistic miracle that took place in Lanciano, Italy roughly 1,300 years ago, the Body and Blood from that miracle are still preserved and another in Buenos Aires, Argentina from 1996 when three years later Dr. Ricardo Castañón, a Bolivian neurophysiologist, was called in to have samples from the Host examined in a laboratory environment.</p><p>Dr. Frederick Zugibe, an esteemed cardiologist and forensic pathologist at Columbia University in New York tested the samples he was given and said the person whose heart it came from must have been tortured. Further, Dr. Zugibe was reportedly amazed that when he studied the samples, they were pulsating like a living, beating heart. Dr. Castañón first came across the miracle in 1999, he was an atheist and today, he's a Catholic, of course, he's not that stupid.</p><p>But of course, he is 'Catholic' now and therefore, he cannot be 'trusted'.</p><p>Mind you, the ultimate Jesus-style challenge is this: when Doctor Castañón took the sample to the San Francisco Forensic Institute he did not tell anyone there what it was or where it came from, yet they told him that the samples constituted heart muscle, specifically from the myocardium of the left ventricle and that the blood was human, with human DNA, and of the rare AB-positive type — the same as found on the Shroud of Turin tests as well as yet another eucharistic miracle that took place in Lanciano, Italy roughly 1,300 years ago which the Body and Blood from that miracle are still preserved at a church in the town when in 1970, they were examined scientifically and, like the Buenos Aires sample, found to be from a human heart with AB-positive blood.</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/clip_image0011.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-111674" height="435" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/clip_image0011.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/clip_image0011.jpg 640w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/clip_image0011-300x204.jpg 300w" width="640" /></a></p><p>Maybe we should not trust Zugibe, after all he <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/humanity/index?more=4937771">is Palestinian</a> with family in Bethlehem. Many were the Palestinians who contributed much. He <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1059933/posts">wrote</a> "A fertilized human egg at the moment of Conception, is the opinion of the creator that a human life at that instant, must begin". Was he too sent by the devil?</p><p>But Dr. Frederick T. Zugibe is no huckster, before he died, He was M.D., Ph.D., Chief Medical Examiner at Rockland County, New York and an Adjunct Associate Professor of Pathology Columbia University College of Physician's and Surgeons. He was our best in the field.</p><p><span class="embed-youtube" style="text-align:center; display: block;"><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/dIXrqvJPHKM?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe></span></p><p>Can the "sweat became like great drops of blood falling down upon the ground<i>" </i>as we are told in Luke 22 :42‑44? Zugibe <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.crucifixion-shroud.com/Turin2000.htm">documented</a> cases where  hemorrhage of the vessels supplying the sweat glands into the ducts of the sweat glands extrude out onto the skin. Hematidrosis has been reported to occur from the presence of profound fear accounted for a significant number of<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.crucifixion-shroud.com/Turin2000.htm"> reported cases</a> including six cases in men condemned to execution.</p><p>Perhaps this is the Grand Conspiracy where Lucifer is using Zugibe and a Carmelite nun named Lucia to convert the world to Catholicism through the Fatima apparition? I once had this argument with three nuns who told me that the Eucharist can become heart. I laughed at them. The three nuns then prayed for me daily for twenty years and then I saw the light that a Eucharist changing into heart tissue was a real miracle. I mean common, shepherds ... Carmelite nuns ... incorruptible saints ... shrouds and images of Jesus and Mary ... are you out of your mind Walid? (just saying). But when I see Dr. Zugibe come to the same conclusion I am 100% convinced.</p><div id="attachment_111675" style="width: 521px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/zugibe.jpg"><img alt="" class="wp-image-111675" height="366" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/zugibe.jpg" width="511" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Dr. Zugibe and wife Catherine with Sister Lucia of Fatima on April 28, 2002.</p></div><div id="attachment_111677" style="width: 525px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/vocation-sisters-singing.jpg"><img alt="" class="wp-image-111677 " height="272" sizes="(max-width: 515px) 100vw, 515px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/vocation-sisters-singing.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/vocation-sisters-singing.jpg 435w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/vocation-sisters-singing-300x159.jpg 300w" width="515" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The Three Sister Nuns who were praying for me. I always thought they were absolutely mad and uneducated, of course until I examined the facts. O that wretched man that I am. Damn the devil. Damn the devil to hell.</p></div><p>Was all this faked up in the Shroud with all the dumbbell-type injuries, obviously caused by the flagrum which contains leather thongs with bits of metal or bone at the ends?</p><p>Why would the devil want proven instead of denounce Psalm 22:18, Matthew 27:35, Luke 23:34 and John 19:24: “They divide My garments among them, And for My clothing they cast lots”?</p><p>The Shroud proves Christ was crucified nude without His garments! Why would God embarrass Himself for a bunch of stinking sinners?</p><p>Why would the devil want Psalm 34:20, John 19:33-36 proven, that Christ Kept all His bones?</p><p>Why would the devil want Colossians 1:15, John 14:9 and John 1:18 proven, that Christ is the invisible image of God?</p><p>Why would the devil want to prove Isaiah 52:14 “His appearance was marred more than any man”?</p><p>Why would the devil want to prove the “crown of thorns” in Genesis 3:18, Mark 15:17, John 19:5, and Matthew 27:2 that Christ was the King of the Jews?</p><p>Why would the devil want Christ’s crucifixion proven as prophesied in Psalm 22:14-16 and in Zechariah 12:10 when it says “they will look upon Me whom they have pierced”?</p><p>Why would the devil ever preach the true Gospel and then etch it on a cloth preserving it for all to see?</p><p>So perhaps all these experts faked up their findings because these where messengers of Lucifer?</p><p>If so, here then lays the Jesus-style question: <em>why aren't the rest of the anti-biblical scholars who are of the minions of this world pouring into such miracles to aid in the conversion towards Lucifer? </em></p><p>And why would the devil, who loves death, want known that the transference of the Image to the cloth even speaks of a future resurrection event? In the words of St. Paul:</p><blockquote><p>“Behold, I tell you a mystery; we will not all sleep, but we will all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet; for the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and this mortal must put on immortality. But when this perishable will have put on the imperishable, and this mortal will have put on immortality, then will come about the saying that is written, ‘Death is swallowed up in victory. O Death, where is your victory? O death, where is your sting?’” 1 Corinthians 15:52-54.</p></blockquote><p>The very war with the devil who caused death is defeated as evidenced in the Shroud. Again:</p><blockquote><p>“For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so God will bring with Him those who have fallen asleep in Jesus. For this we say to you by the word of the Lord, that we who are alive and remain until the coming of the Lord, will not precede those who have fallen asleep. For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive and remain will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we shall always be with the Lord,” 1 Thessalonians 4:14-17.</p></blockquote><p>Have I gone mad or am I living in a wicked and adulterous generation that seeks signs and wonders?</p><p>But of course, Protestants question the whole notion of an authoritative church teaching and argue that Christians have the right and the responsibility to question church institutions and teachings in the light of Scripture.</p><p>Alright then, have it your way. In the 1960s the Catholic Church held its landmark council Vatican II and instituted sweeping ecclesiastical reforms and reformulated its theology to create more openness to Protestant churches and the way these review that scripture is to be interpreted by the laity.</p><p>Has it helped? Since then Protestants have been debating what they ought to think about Rome. The views still range from fierce denunciations of Catholicism as a cult or false church to calls for Protestants and Christians to put their old differences aside and to worship and evangelize side by side.</p><p>I disagree with both. Protestants are simply stolen sheep wandering without a shepherd failing to interpret correctly the text of scripture.</p><p>And today as a result we are in a mess with the fast quicksand of liberal infiltration on all sides where liberals infused textual criticism of the very scripture that they claim they want to defend. Everything from the perpetual virginity, David's existence to even the life of Christ is under attack.</p><p>Here, I will take you on a short journey and explain just one example out of thousands just to show you what sheep must endure from the wiles of the devil and how much homework I must pour to answer them. Believe me, the response I have you would find nowhere.</p><p>Example: "And he went and dwelt in a city called Nazareth, that what was spoken by the prophets might be fulfilled, 'He shall be called a Nazarene.'"</p><p>So without a central authority, now questions arise and the tares make the same arguments similar to the skeptics who question the Shroud and Juan Diego's tilma. They argue; since there is no such prediction in the Old Testament about anyone coming out of Nazareth, this prophecy fails. That the name <em>Nazareth</em> (which means branch) and <em>Nazarene</em> (which means vow) aren't even remotely similar.</p><p>That, plus Nazareth was never mentioned once in the Old Testament, yet Matthew insists that "He shall be called a Nazarene" in relation to the name Nazareth. After all Matthew insists that He lived in Nazareth to fulfill this ancient prophecy that Christ would be a Nazarene but we know Christ drank wine which means He broke the Nazarene vow.</p><p>Nazareth was an insignificant tiny village from around 900 BC until the Babylonian exile, and was only reestablished during the Maccabbean era around 200 BC. It remained a small, remote, and virtually unknown rural village, although it was not far from the major Roman center of Sepphoris in Jesus’ time. Nazareth was never once mentioned in any writing; Josephus, neither the ancient Egyptians, Aramaic, Hittite, or Phoenician records and was an insignificant criticized place.</p><div id="attachment_111693" style="width: 729px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Nazareth_covered_street_high_arches_mat04113sr.jpg"><img alt="" class="wp-image-111693 size-full" height="1024" sizes="(max-width: 719px) 100vw, 719px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Nazareth_covered_street_high_arches_mat04113sr.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Nazareth_covered_street_high_arches_mat04113sr.jpg 719w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Nazareth_covered_street_high_arches_mat04113sr-211x300.jpg 211w" width="719" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nazareth. How did the donkeys come about? Who made donkeys?</p></div><p>Matthew, therefore 'so they will push in your face' must have "erred"; he must have made a mistake in his use of the Old Testament.</p><p>But its not only this verse, there are literally thousands of issues and books they bring up and a poor sheep cannot deal with the Niagara falls worth of doubts hailing on his head. Not every sheep with a Bible is a scholar. So what must one do?</p><p>Answer: recognize the devil. Ignore the devil and he will flee from you. Remember the words of our Lord.</p><p>One can throw thousands of monkey wrenches like this at both Protestants and Catholics which both have to defend the same way by getting into all sorts of nitty-gritty worthless arguments.</p><p>The wise asks: where was Matthew making any etymological comparison between Nazareth versus Nazarene?</p><p>So lets walk through just this argument alone about Nazareth to show how it is simpler than most think and how the world complicates the issues. Matthew is simply saying that God had Him move to Nazareth so that what the prophets spoken of his <em>rejection</em> and belittling would be fulfilled for he was later on called: "a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes" (Acts 24:5).</p><p>Matthew in no way shape or form was saying that all the prophets predicted Messiah to come out of Nazareth or that He would be called Nazarene just because this is what Nazareth means.</p><p>In addition, Matthew has Christ in Nazareth which means Branch and in Arabic means Victory (Al-Nasira) and that he is a sacrificial vow (Nazarene). These two words fulfill everything the prophets foretold.</p><p>Christ in the Middle East is called Yasu' Al-Nasiri which literally means Christ the Victorious.</p><p>Yet the Protestants when they argue against Catholicism they would disagree on any answer given to them regarding saints, the Eucharist, Mary ... yet they would agree with me here on the issue of Nazareth regardless that I am applying the same approach to answer in defense of Catholic theology.</p><p>The issue is never fact but prejudice.</p><p>Nazarene being derived from Nazareth is only a subject created by scholarly conjecture. Matthew was not speaking of any specific prophecy about a Messiah being called a Nazarene to be found in the Old Testament, but that <em>the Old Testament is fulfilled by these two words: Nasarett (Victory) and Nezeri (sacrificial vow). </em></p><p>Matthew was simply saying what he said: And he [Christ] went and dwelt in a city called Nazareth [Nasarett], <strong><em>that everything that the prophets foretold will be fulfilled</em></strong> and is why '<strong><em>He shall be called a Nazarene</em></strong>'" [the Sacrifice].</p><p>The correct argument should not be that Nazareth must match Nazarene since nowhere does Matthew even hint that one word "Nazareth" must now match the word "Nazarene" but the opposite; <em>that both words must match Him and by that fulfilling all what the prophets foretold. </em></p><p>Two words and in them is everything we need to prove that Jesus was the Messiah.</p><p>And once we examine the ancient languages it all fits, like a glove.</p><p><em>Nazarene</em> is from Nzr and <em>Nazareth</em> is from Nsr (no "z" sounding as Sion in Zion) and till today Nazareth is called Nasirat (victory).</p><p>Nazarene is from <em>Nzr</em> (Nezer) or <em>Ndr</em> (Aramaic Nedhr). <em>Ndr</em> means "vow" and "<em>Ndr Dbh</em>" (نذر ذبح) is <em>Vow to Sacrifice</em>.</p><p>I know this because I lived it where our colloquial language remains trickling down from ancient Aramaic mixed with Arabic. That plus keeping much of these traditions which I lived to see many times. Christ becomes the "Nezer" (Ndr) or "Neder" (Ndr) the vow offering where a “covenant” with Abraham—a promise that <em>God vowed</em> to fulfill and Christ was the offering. In fact, one can find this is some old scholarly works. See "Nzr" and "Ndr" are but the same:</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ndr2.jpeg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter wp-image-111633" height="280" sizes="(max-width: 416px) 100vw, 416px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ndr2.jpeg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ndr2.jpeg 392w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ndr2-300x202.jpeg 300w" width="416" /></a></p><p>Do you see Ndr and Nzr are "only dialectically different" and both words means <em>exactly the same thing</em>. One can also examine Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://books.google.com/books?id=vQ7IaZjlFj0C&pg=PA242&lpg=PA242&dq=Ndr+Nzr&source=bl&ots=iZgvRMcSOq&sig=n9EMAqsyovlFo9CvHS6Jg8pCCf8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj9m-WOs5jUAhUR0IMKHe_ECBAQ6AEIKzAB#v=onepage&q=Ndr%20Nzr&f=false">pages 242-252</a>. All one has to do is to look up "Ndr" in the Arabic (نذر ذبح) in Google images to see how people still carryout customs of sacrifice where they still slaughter animals to fulfill a vow. In the Bible <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.blueletterbible.org/search/search.cfm?Criteria=vowed&t=KJV#s=s_primary_0_1">Ndr can be found</a> to mean "vow" which such vows are always fulfilled by a sacrifice. "If my son survives this surgery, I vow to sacrifice a lamb" is the usual.</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ndr.jpeg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-111627" height="251" sizes="(max-width: 689px) 100vw, 689px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ndr.jpeg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ndr.jpeg 689w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ndr-300x109.jpeg 300w" width="689" /></a></p><p>It also has to do with crowning. Leviticus 22:21 and <span class="scriptRef"><a id="3" class="stL" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.studylight.org/desk/index.cgi?q1=Deuteronomy+33:16&t1=en_nas" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Deuteronomy 33:16</a></span> is taken direct from <span class="scriptRef"><a id="4" class="stL" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.studylight.org/desk/index.cgi?q1=Genesis+49:26&t1=en_nas" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Genesis 49:26</a> and t</span>he crowning of the High Priest is also the crowning of the Messiah:</p><blockquote><p><span class="notranslate">"The semitic root <span class="hebrew">נזר</span> <em>nzr</em> / <em>ndr</em> ("withdraw from the customary use") is behind the Hebrew noun <span class="hebrew">נזר</span> <em>nezær</em> " <em>consecration</em> / diadem" and is related With the designation <span class="hebrew">נזיר</span> <em>nāzîr</em> "Consecrated / Nasirä" (→ <a class="sachwort" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=en&prev=search&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=de&sp=nmt4&u=https://www.bibelwissenschaft.de/de/wibilex/das-bibellexikon/lexikon/sachwort/anzeigen/details/nasiraeer-2/ch/f1807eb59dbf618cfd1f8c4187071aff/&usg=ALkJrhgaVh6Kuq1Z4Kq0bcMIkSf5tSxfjg">Nasirä</a> ).</span> <span class="notranslate">From the type נזר <span class="hebrew">nezær</span> <em>describes</em> rather the diadem than the closed crown (G. Mayer, 329f.).</span></p></blockquote><p><span class="notranslate">The diadem is a visible sign of the royal dignity. Matthew's one-line prophecy was speaking on Messiah being anointed as High-Priest and King which Nzr fulfills.</span> <span class="notranslate">In 2 Sam 1,10, the young man who gave Saul the death penalty reported to David that he had taken the severely injured Saul diadem and arm brace, which he now handed over.</span> <span class="notranslate">On the ascent of the seven-year-old Joash, the diadem is placed on the throne ( <a class="bibelstelle" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=en&prev=search&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=de&sp=nmt4&u=https://www.bibelwissenschaft.de/de/bibeltext/2.K%25C3%25B6n%252011%252C12//bibel/text/lesen/ch/4e55217cf74a425b8825f076e491aea1/&usg=ALkJrhjG5xfmtehpvUoIyAKe6zFGbsB7Lw" rel="bibelstellenPopup">2 Kings 11: 12</a> , <a class="bibelstelle" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=en&prev=search&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=de&sp=nmt4&u=https://www.bibelwissenschaft.de/de/bibeltext/2.K%25C3%25B6n%252011%252C12//bibel/text/lesen/ch/4e55217cf74a425b8825f076e491aea1/&usg=ALkJrhjG5xfmtehpvUoIyAKe6zFGbsB7Lw" rel="bibelstellenPopup">2</a> Chr 23:11).</span> <span class="notranslate">When, in the post-exilic period, the High Priest assumed a deputy royal function, the diadem also surrendered to it as a royal insignia ( Ex 9: 29 , Ex .</span> <span class="notranslate">That the Diadem of David's might have been decorated with flowers, suggests <a class="bibelstelle" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=en&prev=search&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=de&sp=nmt4&u=https://www.bibelwissenschaft.de/de/bibeltext/Ps%2520132%252C18//bibel/text/lesen/ch/e1d1b0a0ee8225e1bea61a99f768fa8c/&usg=ALkJrhjqQfnT6iEKrmpg3KCR4on1soSWfw" rel="bibelstellenPopup">Ps 132:18</a> . (see </span><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.bibelwissenschaft.de/stichwort/24181/">Krone / Krönung (AT) - Lexikon</a>).</p><p>Nzr fulfills Psalm 132:18, a promise to crown the Messiah: "His enemies will I clothe with shame; but upon himself shall his crown [nzr] shine.'" And this Psalm <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/05/27/millions-of-muslims-and-chinese-getting-ready-to-convert-to-christianity-through-the-virgin-mary-to-defy-and-fight-against-the-muslim-nation-of-turkey/">connects to St. Mary the Ark Who arises with Christ to heaven</a>.</p><blockquote><p>“One relic of the ancient insignia has been preserved, which was probably prized as the most precious of all. It was the golden plate affixed to the turban, inscribed ‘Holiness to Jehovah,’ which was believed to have come down from the time of Aaron, and which, treasured through all the vicissitudes of the Jewish state, was carried to Rome by Titus, and seen there by the great Jewish Rabbi, in the time of Hadrian” (Stanley, J. <span class="ital">C. </span>3:353).</p></blockquote><p>A diadem is a turban with such insignia. Even when John writes on the diadems on the horns of the heads of the beast, he is referring to turbans.</p><p>A Nzr is all about God's vow:</p><blockquote><p>"The Lord has made a vow (Nzr) and will not change his mind: 'You are a priest forever.'" <i>Psalm 110.</i></p></blockquote><p>Indeed, Matthews one line prophecy covers everything the prophets foretold which makes it amazing, not weak. God made a "sacrificial vow". It was the vow that changed history. It was also David's vow in Psalms 132 before He (Messiah) arose with His Ark (Mary) which we explained in detail [<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/05/27/millions-of-muslims-and-chinese-getting-ready-to-convert-to-christianity-through-the-virgin-mary-to-defy-and-fight-against-the-muslim-nation-of-turkey/">here</a>].</p><p>His heart was heavy with a pain he carried since his youth, David was burdened over the lack of the manifest presence of God to rest in the midst of his people and that vow changed the course of human history establishing a tabernacle with lavish offering that God later commanded a continual ordinance amongst the people of God (2Ch. 29:25-26) fulfilling the continuation of the Passover:</p><blockquote><p>"And whosoever offereth a <strong>sacrifice of peace offerings</strong> unto the LORD to <strong>accomplish <em>his</em> vow</strong> (Hebrew: Ndr), or a freewill offering in beeves or sheep, it shall be perfect to be accepted; there shall be no blemish therein." (Leviticus 22:21)</p></blockquote><p>Being Nazarene is to be separated. Christ was separated as a the only one, unique, the sacrificial lamb "sacrifice of peace offering" from the rest of his brethren as in Deuteronomy 33:16 uses "separated"—Heb., nâzîr. This was the particular feature in Joseph’s history, when he was “sold into Egypt,” and “separated from his brethren,” is part of the meaning of “Nazarene” when applied to Messiah in <span class="scriptRef"><a id="5" class="stL" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.studylight.org/desk/index.cgi?q1=Matthew+2:23&t1=en_nas" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Matthew 2:23</a>.</span></p><p>And how many Christians even know this? How can they even contend with the onslaught of the devil?</p><p>Nazareth is also the branch:</p><blockquote><p>Behold the days come, <span class="SpellE">saith</span> the Lord, that I will raise unto David a righteous <span class="SpellE">tsemah</span> (branch) and a king shall reign and prosper, and shall execute justice and righteousness in the earth.</p></blockquote><p>And <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/نصر">in Arabic</a> Nsr (نَصَرَ נָצְרַת‎‎  in Hebrew Nizret) is<strong class="Arab headword" lang="ar" xml:lang="ar"> "</strong>to rescue, to save. to water abundantly which we get the term <i class="Arab mention" lang="ar"><a title="نصراني" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D9%86%D8%B5%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%8A#Arabic">نَصْرَانِيّ</a></i> <span class="mention-gloss-paren">(</span><span class="mention-tr tr Latn" lang="ar-Latn" xml:lang="ar-Latn">naṣrāniyy</span>, <span class="mention-gloss-double-quote">“</span><span class="mention-gloss"><a title="Nazarene" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Nazarene">Nazarene</a>, <a title="Christian" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Christian">Christian</a></span><span class="mention-gloss-double-quote">”</span><span class="mention-gloss-paren">). O</span>ne can look up the Arabic to <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://cooljugator.com/ar/نصر">see an array</a> of how this word means "the helper" "Nasart". In <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/jon/1/16/t_conc_890016">Jonah 1:16, the Hebrew</a> for "Then the men feared the LORD exceedingly, and offered a sacrifice unto the LORD, and made vows." The use "sacrifice" (zebahזֶבַח ׃) which is literally "a slaughter" unto the Lord and made "vows" (Ndr: "נְדָרִֽ").</p><p>Proverbs 7:15 "I have peace offering with me; this day have I payed my vows". "This day shall be for you a memorial day, and you shall keep it as a feast to the Lord; throughout your generations, as a statute forever, you shall keep it as a feast." This always involved a sacrifice.</p><p>People who deny transubstantiation do not know what they are saying. Scholars have often wondered how the Eucharist came from the Lords Supper, which occurred in the context of the Jewish Passover. But since Passover occurs only once a year, how is it that the Christians celebrate Jesus sacrificial meal weekly, if not daily?</p><p>How many western Christians even examine the <em>tôwdâh</em> sacrifice (Hebrew <span id="yui-gen95" class="Hb">תּוֹדָה</span> <span id="yui-gen96" class="strgtrans">tôwdâh),</span> "adoration"; specifically, a choir of worshippers:—confession, (sacrifice of) praise, thanks (giving, offering) and <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.almaany.com/ar/dict/ar-en/وَادَع/">in Arabic</a> (وَدَى <em>wadâ) "to </em>become reconciled by ransom" (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.almaany.com/ar/dict/ar-ar/الدِّيةُ/.">al-Diyya</a> الدِّيةُ) which always includes a sacrifice.</p><p>The <em>tôwdâh</em><em> </em>was one of the most significant sacrifices of the Jews. The Pesiqta as quoted in Hartmut Gese (<em>Essays On Biblical Theology) </em>says<em>:</em></p><blockquote><p>"In the coming Messianic age all sacrifices will cease, but the thank offering [<em>todah</em>] will never cease."</p></blockquote><p>And indeed the animal sacrifices ceased except the <em>tôwdâh</em>. Many who Hebrews 13:15, they think its about a singing choir when it is about a sacrifice:</p><blockquote><p>By Him therefore let us offer the <strong>sacrifice of praise</strong> to God continually, that is, the fruit of our lips giving thanks to His name.</p></blockquote><p>To say this is all about a choir singing praises is far from the truth. But having read so far, most doubting Thomasses would quickly look up the commentaries for help to only find more error. Zondervan note for Hebrews 13:15 reads:</p><blockquote><p>“Even here, [the author of Hebrews] makes one last reference to sacrifice. Now, we have only a ‘sacrifice of praise’ to offer, because Christ accomplished all that was needed.”</p></blockquote><p>But Hebrews 13:15 would be considered the<em> tôwdâh</em> sacrifice the life saving offering that the redeemed person would show his gratitude to God which was equivalent to the <em>tôwdâh</em> sacrificial meal which included lamb and bread with wine accompanied by prayers and songs of thanksgiving, such as Psalm 116. It was the most important and common peace offering. This was the backdrop for Jesus and the Last Supper which most Christians today are completely ignorant about.</p><p><img alt="" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-111694" height="1067" sizes="(max-width: 1600px) 100vw, 1600px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/the-last-supper_I4C0669-1800.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/the-last-supper_I4C0669-1800.jpg 1600w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/the-last-supper_I4C0669-1800-300x200.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/the-last-supper_I4C0669-1800-768x512.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/the-last-supper_I4C0669-1800-1024x683.jpg 1024w" width="1600" /></p><p>The Hebrew <em>tôwdâh</em> was <em>eucharistia</em>, which literally means "thanksgiving" and is how it was viewed from the earliest Christian sources and is how they celebrated the Lord's meal, or what we call the Mass. It was known by Christians as the Eucharist from when the Last Supper Jesus took the bread and wine and gave "thanks" (<em>eucharistia</em>) over them (Luke 22:19).</p><p>"And you shall observe the Feast of Unleavened Bread, for on this very day I brought your hosts out of the land of Egypt. Therefore you shall observe this day, throughout your generations, as a statute forever."</p><p>This sacrificial system never ended for it is "forever" and Christ was our Ndr/Nzr and <em>tôwdâh</em>. Just one verse in Matthew to cover all this and more. Interpreting scripture is not for the amateur.</p><p>In the upper room with his disciples, Christ celebrated Passover transformed the old sacrificial system of the old covenant into one giving his own body and blood as the lamb for the new Passover, the <em>tôwdâh</em> and Passover together — giving thanks for deliverance through His death and Resurrection to the Father for His love and for the new life to be granted in the Resurrection over the bread with His thanksgiving.</p><p>This is the Christian tradition and is why every re-enactment of the Last Supper is called "Eucharist."</p><p>Most ignore that Jesus brought about a new exodus. Most do not even pay attention when God told the Israelites that the Passover celebration is "forever" (Exodus 12:14).</p><p>So how is a sacrifice forever? This alone debunks all arguments that say "Catholics re-sacrifice Christ".</p><p>So when Jesus told them "Do this in remembrance of me" (Luke 22:19), this act of remembrance is not simply a mental remembrance but the <em>tôwdâh</em><em> </em>is the exercise of such remembrance recalling in gratitude God's saving deeds which we too must partake in the literal lamb of God: the Eucharist.</p><p>This is why in John 6 both acts go hand in hand:</p><blockquote><p>“Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. <em><strong>Whoever feeds on my flesh</strong></em> and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. As the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so whoever feeds on me, he also will live because of me."</p></blockquote><p>How can such a remembrance be void of the act? Christ was transforming the Passover sacrifice into his own body and blood and now we must eat of this new sacrifice: His Body.</p><p>This is the Eucharist for if it is not why would the verse say: “And do not forget to do good and to share with others, for with such <em>sacrifices</em> God is pleased” (Heb. 13:16)?</p><p>Here we have 'sacrifices' (plural which includes praises and Eucharistic sacrifice) and is why in Hebrews 13 it says: “<em>We have an altar</em> from which those who minister at the tabernacle <em>have no right to eat</em>…" Christians <em>do</em> eat from an altar—the altar of the Cross—when we receive Christ in the Eucharist; and we join him in giving thanks and praise to the Father for having saved him—<em>and through him, us—</em>from the curse of death.</p><p>Yet despite all my explanations and interpretations of that single verse in Matthew, the liberal tares would still disagree even when I applied the scripture for evidence. Why?</p><p>But its not only the liberal tare who objects. While the Protestant complains about the liberal tares, he does not realize, that his arguments against the Catholic's Perpetual Virginity, Intercession of Saints, the Eucharist ... is all identical in its approach to the liberal tare whom he complains so much about and is why Christ warned to examine the log in the eye first.</p><p>The biblical text at face-value simply does not provide all the answers unless one knows how to use the scripture. Scripture is a tool but only for the wise few.</p><p>In reality, the modern Evangelical is a product of decades worth of liberal infusion into his theology which slowly chips away on his entire foundation where what is left is a naked Jesus or a crucifix missing the naked Jesus. He does not realize he is now the tare coming after whatever the liberal locusts did not consume from poorly catechized Catholics.</p><p>Yet he fails to complain about his own approach instead of heeding to the primitive church which has ironed out most of these issues within two millennia. How can one unravel the Niagara falls of issues?</p><p>Answer: <em>by being stubborn</em>.</p><p>If I can describe the tare versus the wheat, a tare has no substance while the wheat has substance: WHEAT!</p><p>If anything, a devout Catholic is constantly consuming the wheat offering and believes its the literal Body and Blood of Christ regardless to how many speak of a gluten free diet and grape juice. The tare rejects this because he has no wheat and insists on offering fruit while God told Cain to offer real meat. The wheat has the Wheat, the Bread of Life: Christ.</p><div id="attachment_111634" style="width: 1610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img alt="" class="wp-image-111634 size-full" height="1200" sizes="(max-width: 1600px) 100vw, 1600px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/whttare.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/whttare.jpg 1600w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/whttare-300x225.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/whttare-768x576.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/whttare-1024x768.jpg 1024w" width="1600" /><p class="wp-caption-text">No you fool, the tares are the two on the left. Wheat is that fat one on the right. It cares less how it looks while the tares always love to appear slim and straight shaped for they depend on their outwards appearances. The Wheat resembles the consumption of the Eucharist for it is loaded with wheat which without there is no life while the tares offer nothing but contention and divide.</p></div><p>When one wants to drink, he calls for a known well-digger who knows how and where to dig to draw the spring. And when all is done, you drink everyday. You are not required to know how to dig for wells. What you are required to do is to trust the well digger. This would be your good priest.</p><p>The key is to avoid bad questions. The tare will always ask the same questions: <em>aren't the priests these days corrupt and the priesthood infested with homosexuality</em>?</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2D0A0C9000000578-3258644-image-a-41_1443878262968.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-111695" height="422" sizes="(max-width: 634px) 100vw, 634px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2D0A0C9000000578-3258644-image-a-41_1443878262968.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2D0A0C9000000578-3258644-image-a-41_1443878262968.jpg 634w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2D0A0C9000000578-3258644-image-a-41_1443878262968-300x200.jpg 300w" width="634" /></a></p><p>The wise would answer: didn't Jesus say: "remember Lot's wife"? He was saying this in the context of end times. Why would Jesus say this? It is because He knew that before He comes that sodomy will infest the world including the church where He called Jerusalem "Sodom". This "Jerusalem" encompasses more than the city for it is allegory of the church.</p><p>This miracle of prophecy in itself is evidence that He is true. No one can deny that this prophecy is being fulfilled to the letter. The objection is clear evidence '<em>for'</em> and not against scripture. This is what I mean by 'real miracle'.</p><p>Yes, multitudes are corrupt, but a good priest produces good fruit, he does not molest the sheep. It might take sometime to find one, but they are out there. But as far as homosexuality goes, it proves that God was perfectly correct. We live in a world of constant arm-twisting. Be as stubborn as a Palestinian and make sure your righteousness exceeds that of the pharisees. You will rarely find people as stubborn as us, the Palestinians or the Coptic Egyptians. Nothing can move us or shake us. No, not even the blade of ISIS. We have been trained since childhood to know how to die with honor.</p><p>The tare would say; its all about money and power!</p><p>But if the biblical accounts were made by men seeking power, why would God choose insignificant shepherds to announce His birth in an insignificant village named "Bethlehem" instead of classy Jerusalem? He then decides to be raised in an even more insignificant village called Nazareth despite the critics. And why would Mexico too be converted by an event in 1531 involving an insignificant shepherd named Juan Diego?</p><p>Millions in Mexico where being converted to Catholicism through a single miracle while in Europe the Protestant revolution was reaching a peak during the peasant revolt arguing over all things Catholic.</p><p>To squelch all the controversy in Europe, why didn't St. Mary when speaking to Juan Diego just tell him "Listen Juan, tell the Bishop that the Catholic Church is wrong, follow St. Luther"?</p><p>But instead the results of the meeting was that Catholicism, all with its hotly debated doctrines in Europe, permeated the new world where priests daily baptized 14,000 of the indigenous population (keep in mind per day), 9 million in all, while in the old world 'a revolt' was brewing and was void of any heavenly miracles.</p><p>So we have one event that caused the loss of a third of Catholics to Protestantism while the other regained what was lost sweeping throughout South America and Mexico converting millions more of these pagans to Christianity.</p><p>The tare would ask: was all this perhaps the work of demons? Was it all perhaps a hoax created by the Catholics to convert poor uneducated indigenous Indians to the faith so they can collect more indulgences based on a fake story?</p><p>But if this story of Juan Diego was fake, what do we do with the 16-page manuscript called the <i><a class="mw-redirect" title="Nican mopohua" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nican_mopohua">Nican mopohua</a></i>, which was acquired by the New York Public Library in 1880 and has been reliably dated to have been written in 1556? This document, written in Nahuatl in Latin script, tells the story of the apparitions and the supernatural origin of the image we call Guadalupe.</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/nican_mopohuaImg.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-111651" height="760" sizes="(max-width: 571px) 100vw, 571px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/nican_mopohuaImg.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/nican_mopohuaImg.jpg 571w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/nican_mopohuaImg-225x300.jpg 225w" width="571" /></a></p><p>But then came more critics who said that the account of a Juan Diego existing is a made up story. Yet such faulty claims permeated until 1995 when Father Xavier Escalada one of today's 'dreaded Jesuits', whose four volume Guadalupe encyclopedia had just been published, announced the existence of a sheet of parchment (known as <i>Codex Escalada</i>), which bore an illustrated account of the vision and some notations in Nahuatl concerning the life and death of Juan Diego, previously unknown, the document was dated by experts to have been drawn in 1548.</p><p>And why is it that the Almighty kept this ace in the hole hidden if such a story of Guadalupe was a 'fraud' and only have one insignificant man named José Antonio Vera Olvera find the parchment, by chance, enclosed in a manila envelope and lodged between the pages of a 19th century devotional work on sale in a second-hand book market?</p><p>And we have similar stories like this erupt out of nowhere. When sophists and complex textual critics began to question the power of prophecy they claimed that there were two Isaiahs, one who wrote the history and another who later on injected prophecy after the fact. Such theories became popular, of course.</p><p>However, one insignificant shepherd named Muhammad Dhib in the Ta'mara village near Bethlehem <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-artifacts/dead-sea-scrolls/cast-of-characters/">busted all the myth</a> when he accidentally found the entire book of Isaiah intact. He thought it would make good leather that he tried to sell it to a shoe repair shop downtown Bethlehem for a shilling. It finally ended up in the hands of Yeshue Samuel, a Turkish priest from the Syrian Orthodox Church who recognized a gem and purchased the Isaiah, Habakkuk and Genesis scrolls (1QIsaa; 1QapHab; and 1QapGen) from Dhib to end up being examined by the famed American scholar William F. Albright, who dated them to around 100 B.C.</p><p>Later on they even discovered an entire collection of about 900 documents in all, including texts from the Hebrew Bible, discovered between 1947 and 1956 in 11 caves on the northwest shore of the Dead Sea in Israel that showed an entire millennia older Bible than the oldest we had proving not only that we have one Isaiah, but that our Bible has no changes which rendered many of the so-called scholarly claims worthless.</p><div id="attachment_111690" style="width: 586px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Dead-Sea-Scrolls-Examination.jpg"><img alt="" class="wp-image-111690 size-full" height="432" sizes="(max-width: 576px) 100vw, 576px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Dead-Sea-Scrolls-Examination.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Dead-Sea-Scrolls-Examination.jpg 576w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Dead-Sea-Scrolls-Examination-300x225.jpg 300w" width="576" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Will these guys ever rest and just let it go?</p></div><div id="attachment_111705" style="width: 2058px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/DSC01362.jpg"><img alt="" class="wp-image-111705 size-full" height="1153" sizes="(max-width: 2048px) 100vw, 2048px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/DSC01362.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/DSC01362.jpg 2048w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/DSC01362-300x169.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/DSC01362-768x432.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/DSC01362-1024x577.jpg 1024w" width="2048" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Heck, in Israel we have Silver Amulets dated 7th century B.C. – 400 years older than the Dead Sea Scrolls, these are the oldest copies of biblical text known to man and you find no textual critics hovering over it or people even knowing about it</p></div><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/im.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-111706" height="360" sizes="(max-width: 480px) 100vw, 480px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/im.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/im.jpg 480w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/im-300x225.jpg 300w" width="480" /></a></p><p>The Septuagint and the Dead Sea Scrolls establish solid evidence for the coming Messiah unquestionably predated the time that Jesus Christ walked the earth rendering all theories of 1st Century AD conspiracies and stories about prophecy manipulation by 'scholars' as worthless.</p><p>In the meanwhile, they will one day come to kill me for believing in Jesus and His Mother, Our Lady of Guadalupe. But we are not the only martyrs, there are others more worthy before us: the last Crusaders, just like the Maccabees were simple stubborn Mexican peasants, not scholars:</p><p><span class="embed-youtube" style="text-align:center; display: block;"><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/9E1t54alMvY?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&start=8&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe></span></p><div class="page" title="Page 14"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column">

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Amazing Miracles Are Happening That Are Astonishing Scientists, They Prove That Christianity Is The Only True Faith And All Other Religions Are Of The Devil

By Walid Shoebat (Shoebat Sunday Special)Why critical scholarly opinions abound on matters that pertain to the miraculous, especially when miracles defy science?  Why do textual critics abound hovering over ancient biblical manuscripts? And why …

Read More...»

Muslim Man Rescues Sixty-Four Christians From Being Beheaded By Jihadist Terrorists

<p>A Muslim man in the Philippines, named Noor Lucman, rescued 64 Christians by hiding them in his home, as ISIS terrorists were searching for victims to slaughter. According to Lucman, if the terrorists would have found them, they would have been beheaded. This is another story of a Good Samaritan, a man who is not a Christian, but has a noble and good soul. I doubt the counterjihad loons are reporting on this one. Here is a video interview of Lucman recounting his story:</p><p><span class="embed-youtube" style="text-align:center; display: block;"><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/HyOYVs9TxNA?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe></span></p><p> </p><p>According to <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rt.com/news/390737-philippines-marawi-isis-christians-flee/">the report:</a></p><blockquote><p> Groups of people who managed to escape the fighting in Marawi arrived at a madrasa in the city on Saturday. The army says that more than 150 people were rescued on Saturday, 46 of them children.</p><p>Among the escapees was Noor Lucman, an Islamic writer who helped shelter Christians from the Islamic State-affiliated (IS; formerly ISIS/ISIL) attackers. Lucman described proecting a group of Christians who were carrying out repair works at his home. “I had an ordeal because one day before the attack, there were some Christian workers who were in the house, fixing the small tower,” he said. “So when it happened, they could not leave the city. So I had to take responsibility and protected them.”</p><p>Lucman went on to explain that when the IS-affiliated fighters came knocking at his door he told them to leave. “If they knew that there were Christians in my house, they would all be beheaded and executed,” he stated.</p><p>"<em>The following days, other Christian workers took refuge in my house. There were about 64 of them in my hands and I was very determined that nothing happens to them</em>," the man said, adding that the people he sheltered would only be revealed to terrorists "<em>over [his] dead body</em>."</p><p>"<em>When ISIS came, they recognized me and they showed respect by just leaving when I told them to leave</em>," he went on to say. "<em>They didn't know I was hiding Christians. If they knew that there were Christians in my house, they would all be beheaded and executed</em>."</p><p>As clashes between the military and the jihadists intensified in Marawi, with the army having admitted the fight is far harder than they've expected, Lucman "<em>took an initiative to get the Christians out</em>."'</p><p>When heard that the military "<em>planned to bomb the whole city if ISIS did not accede to the demands of the government</em>," and also considering that he was running out of food, the Muslim man resolved to fleeing with the people at his mercy.</p><p>"<em>I told myself that if I don't take these people out of the house, they would die of hunger, so we might just try and break through, no matter what. There were a lot of snipers along the way, and we had to hope against hope they would not ask those people if they were Christians or Muslims</em>," Lucman said, explaining that the militants "<em>ask you to recite a Muslim reading, and if you don't know it, they kill you</em>."</p></blockquote><div class="columns__content"><div class="article "><div class="article__text text js-mediator-article"><blockquote><p>More than 2,000 civilians remain trapped in the southern Philippines city, besieged by some 250 Islamist militants, according to Reuters. There have been reports of an imminent military assault in the region, where Christians have been killed and taken hostage by the militants. The jihadist fighters represent a mix of local Islamist militants and those from Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Chechnya and Morocco, who joined the cause under the Islamic State banner, officials say.</p></blockquote><p><strong>By Theodore Shoebat<br /></strong></p><p>Countless screams cry from measureless Heaven; endless oceans of blood cry from underneath the earth; and the mournings from the innumerable images of humanity, are as countless as the luminaries of the starry skies, and all are the victims of the same spirit, and that spirit is Evil. There is no king more tyrannical, more blood thirsty, more cruel and callous, than King Evil. He comes in so many different faces, so many different cloaks, and he masquerades himself to the liking of your perception. But perception is where the danger lies.</p><p>Since evil has no problem in suiting our fancies, our prejudices, our emotional compromises, our sycophancies, and our perceptions, the inevitable consequence is that while we reject other evils, we will embrace other evils, defend other evils, and make excuses for some evils. This way of acting is done solely for the reason of a perceived peace; a peace that gratifies our impulses, a peace that will "wink with the eye" and "hate me without a cause. For they do not speak peace, But they devise deceitful matters Against the quiet ones in the land." (Psalm 35:19-20)</p><p>It is the voice that says "'Peace, peace!’ When there is no peace" (Jeremiah 6:14) It is the peace of which Christ spoke of when He said, "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth" (Matthew 10:34), it is the peace that Christ came to destroy with the sword. Christ did not come to compromise with some evil and combat others, He came to destroy all evils. "For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil." (1 John 3:8)</p><p>The Scripture does not say that He came to destroy some evils, but quite emphatically it declares plainly that He came to destroy the works of the devil. There is no compromise, not exceptions, no fear of offense, no favoritism. All of the evils are obliterated without mercy, cut off by the Sword of Eternal Love, slain as St. George slew the dragon, and trampled by holiness as Mary steps over the crescent moon in the vision of St. John.</p><p>This is why I really am not a follower of the secular conservative movement, it only focuses on some evils, why ignoring others. They want an American empire, but not a Christian empire. While secular conservatives will "expose Islam" (in the most vague and superficial ways actually), they will not focus on the extreme evils of abortion, psychiatric drugs, homosexuality and other insidious actions and ideologies. They will say something like, "I do not believe in gay marriage, but I have gay friends, I have dinner with them and they are lovely people. I just disagree with them on this issue."</p><p>They will say they are "Christian," but if they were ever to meet Christ, they would condemn Him for taking up a whip and driving the thieves out of His Father's House. They would be amongst the crowd crying "Crucify him!" because he "broke the law," and the law of the state should always be honored, since we are to "obey our governments."</p><p>These secular conservatives will praise Israel, but for the wrong reasons. They will say something like, "Israel is the most gay-friendly nation in the Middle East," as if this is something praiseworthy. This is a reason to praise Israel? The land that God chose to illuminate the world, praised because it tolerates a man stabbing another man with his phallus? This is not praiseworthy but demonic, and people who encourage praise of Israel for this reason, is following the words the devils whisper into their ears.</p><p>Here on Shoebat.com, we like to fight against all evils. This is why we fight against the Muslims, the leftists, the Hindus, the Buddhists, the Mormons and feminists, the fake "right wing," and neutral deistic conservatism. We do this because our Lord came not to destroy one work of the devil, but all works of the devil.</p><p>Yet there are those who complain and bicker, and say: "Just focus on Islam!" Where in all of Scripture do you see any of the people of God isolating one evil and ignoring the rest? They will argue that, "We are living in America, and Muslims are killing Americans." If this is the basis for your determination, then you should be most enthusiastic against abortion, for millions upon millions of American babies get massacred in such a short amount of years. When a Muslim does a shooting, we all act as though we have never seen such violence.</p><p>In Virginia Tech, a man murdered over thirty people, and he was a devil worshipping occultist. But did the same people who are "fighting Islam" all the time say anything against devil worship or occultism? They simply say that he was "mentally ill" and move on with it. If they truly cared they would be fighting against Islam AND all other demonic religions. When the Germanwings plane crashed, everyone assumed that the person was Muslim. And when we found out that he was not Muslim, but a sodomite deviant, the people who were screaming "Islam!" were no where to be found. Why? Because they don't want to fight the evils of homosexuality, or speak of how the homosexual ideology leads people to murderous rampages.</p><p>This tells us something about these secular conservatives who act like this. They don't care about human life. The lives of the 149 people who were killed in the Germanwings massacre would have only mattered to them if the killer was Muslim. But because the person was a sodomite, they just say "mental illness," hush hush, and continue on praising some atheist because he (or she) "fights Islam."</p><p>Do you understand the hypocrisy of these people?</p><p>They should be picketing mosques AND abortion clinics; they should be fighting the homosexual agenda and the occult devil worshippers. But they do not. Why? Because they do not fight for Christianity, but for some utopian view of "freedom" in which "anyone can do whatever he or she wants, including putting a statue of Christ in urine."</p><p>There is something truly beautiful and majestic about Christianity, in that it is the only honest religion. All wicked people are victims until they reach a position of power, and then they become the victimizer, and oppress with more violence and cruelty than their former persecutors. They are like the unforgiving debtor who tells his master ‘Please, be patient with me, and I will pay it all", but then, in a position of power, turns around and abuses the other who owes him money (Matthew 18:26). When evil people are in the weaker position, they will project a persona of toleration, and speak cunning terms, such as "we can agree to disagree," or "I respect all opinions." Amazingly, Islam plays the same strategy, with the Koran stating lingo that (if we did not know it came from the Koran) we would think was being said by a modern: "You shall have your religion and I shall have my religion." (Koran 109:6)</p><p>The Buddhists and the Hindus, while in America, love to just pour out this idea that they are peoples of toleration and openness, but go to Buddhist nations, or go to India, and you will see brutality and unapologetic cruelty being done to Christians, and other human beings. As Michael Brown, a learned theologian, recently <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/my-response-to-those-calling-me-cowardly/#uS3qqioleztcEOwI.99" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">wrote</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Come to India with me into a radical Hindu village where you are told not to address certain volatile subjects like idolatry, adultery and murder, and then get up and preach on those very themes because you feel God wants you to – and the next night, have your meeting shut down by Hindu militants who take over the stage with knives and razor blades in their hands.</p></blockquote><p>All of this madness springs from the double-mindedness of the sinister. It is the mindset of Cain that invites his brother to the fields before killing him. It is the mindset of the Sultan Alp Arslan who, before releasing a rageful wave of kicks and beatings on the Christian king Romanos Diogenes, promised him that no hand would touch him. It is the mindset of the Muslims who attacked the mall in Kenya, where after they slaughtered so many people and hung their victims on meat hooks, made baby faces at the little child of one of the victims, with one of the attackers begging for forgiveness from one of the hostages.</p><p>It is as though they are fighting with themselves, as though they are in a struggle with their own beings, a struggle between the flesh and spirit, for "Their loyalty is divided between God and the world, and they are unstable in everything they do." (James 1:8)</p><p>This is the nature of all other religions. It is the Christian Faith that is the only faith that is not double-minded, that does not speak peace in one moment and declares war in the next. Christianity is the only religion in the world that looks at all of the evils that man can devise, and says, "I declare war on you." The Christian Faith is absent of all compromise; it does not pretend peace, but instead takes up a whip and drives the harlots out, drives out the compromisers, drives out the thieves and the liars. It cuts out the fat of sycophants, and makes the body lean with the strength of the warrior's arm.</p><p>In Christianity, peace and war are one. When the holy Faith declares war, it is pursuing peace, for to end wars is the blissful aspiration, to usher peace the ultimate desire, and the use of war is the bridge between chaos and serenity. As the warrior David tells us:</p><blockquote><p>Depart from evil and do good; Seek peace and pursue it. The eyes of the Lord are on the righteous, And His ears are open to their cry. The face of the Lord is against those who do evil, To cut off the remembrance of them from the earth. (Psalm 34:14-16)</p></blockquote><p>To be against evil, and to cut it off from all remembrance, is to "Seek peace and pursue it." You may think, "This is not peace! We must be open and acceptable to all lifestyles, because it is the humane thing to do." To know what is humane, is to know what is human. Let us ask ourselves the simple question: "What makes us human?"</p><p>Such a modest question, and yet the wonder it brings is more majestic than all of the cosmos. You may say that what makes us human is our ability to focus on the future. Step on a trail of ants, and the ants runaway. Why? Because the ants as well think upon the future; they run away to reach that future. So then, what makes us to different from the ants? What makes us so different from all other creatures? They eat like we do, they sleep, they have sex, they desire to live, and not one of these traits is absent in human beings. So then what separates us from the animal kingdom? At the surface, nothing.</p><p>Human beings can actually be, at times, worse than animals. Spirituality is what separates humanity from the animal kingdom. Animals have sex, but it is man who partakes in matrimony and esteems it as a sacrament before God. The animal is constantly looking to the earth, but man, he is the only one with the gift of inspiration, to look up to Heaven and smile with graceful bliss. Man is made of dirt, but the purpose of his creation was not to live centered around the dirt, for God breathed His breath into the dirt, and thus was man given a destiny, to forsake the earth, and ascend heavenward.</p><p>Heaven and earth came together, and from this beginning was man made in the image of God. Thus, to be human, is to return to this beginning, and reach the end of humanity's purpose, and that is, to be like God through Jesus Christ. In this beautiful and sublime path, the end is the same as the beginning, and that is, to be an image of God, an image of Christ, and rise above the animal impulses. In the words of St. Maximus the Confessor,</p><blockquote><p>To the inherent goodness of the image is added the likeness (cf Genesis 1:26) acquired by the practice of virtue and the exercise of the will. The inclination to ascend and to see one's proper beginning was implanted in man by nature. (Maximus the Confessor, On the Cosmic Mystery of Jesus Christ, Ambiguum 7, 1084A, trans. Blowers & Wilken)</p></blockquote><p>So many today have raped the word spirituality. They will say that two men sodomizing each other, and loving "God" at the same time, is "spiritual." They will say that some beach where deviant and depraved people fornicate and intoxicate themselves, has "spiritual vibes." They will say that some heretic speaking of embracing all beliefs "demand our contemplation and reflection." These are all examples of how spirituality has been somehow confused with harlotry and decadence; these are illustrations of how people have identified spirituality with the antithesis of spirituality, and that is unrestrained indulgence.</p><p>True spirituality is to rise above the animal impulses, to transcend that which is seen, and join what is unseen. One of the most beautiful gems of spirituality was articulated by the mystic, Gregory Palamas, when he said:</p><blockquote><p>We must transcend ourselves altogether, and give ourselves entirely to God, for it is better to belong to God, and not to ourselves. It is thus that divine things are bestowed on those who have attained to fellowship with God. (Palamas, The Triads, Deification in Christ, 68, trans. Gendle)</p></blockquote><p>It is union with God that severs us from the animal kingdom, and brings us away from the animalistic inclinations. Satan wants us to imprison ourselves in the animalistic impulses. Such is the evils of Darwinism and Evolutionism, which seek to reduce mankind to just being an animal. People who seek to combine Evolutionism with Christianity, as if the two are compatible, in the name of "reason," are doing the devil's work. For they seek to take away the beautiful teachings of Christianity, and make the Faith into an ugly nihilistic religion, in which man would become a slave to himself.</p><p>It is Christianity that sails us through the capricious winds of the passions, and ascends us up to the holy mountain of enlightenment. As we are taught by Lactantius: "the light of the human mind is God, and he who has known and admitted Him into his breast will acknowledge the mystery of the truth with an enlightened heart; but when God and heavenly instruction are removed, all things are full of errors." (Lact. Treatise on the Anger of God, ch. i, trans. William Fletcher)</p><p>The Indians of the Americas were so trapped in the animalistic impulses, that they emulated the animals to the point that they cannibalized each other. But when Christianity arrived, and the flame of enlightenment illuminated their hearts, they placed themselves on the path of truth, eschewed the ways of the animals, and returned to the image in which they were created. Man is made in the image and likeness of God, and to emulate God, is to be like God. But to emulate Satan, is to be like the animals.</p><p>This is the purpose of spirituality, not to embrace the ways of the animals, but to rise above them. "For if we must look to heaven," says Lactantius, "it is undoubtedly for no other reason than on account of religion; if religion is taken away, we have nothing to do with the heaven. …We must therefore devote ourselves to religion, and he who does not undertake this prostrates himself to the ground, and, imitating the life of the brutes, abdicates the office of man." (Lact. Div. Inst. 3.10, trans. William Fletcher, ellipses mine)</p><p>Christianity transcends us from the ways of the dirt, and brings us to God, in Whose likeness we are made. Since what separates man from animals is the ability to be like God, then to be like God is to be human. To be as God is, is to hate evil. Therefore, to be human is to fight against evil. To fight against evil, is the essence of spirituality, and the truest participation in the Christian life. "The fear of the LORD is to hate evil" (Proverbs 8:13), and "The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom" (Proverbs 9:10), and since Christ is "the wisdom of God" (1 Corinthians 1:24), to possess this Wisdom, is to hate evil. To be a Christian is to hate evil.</p><p>To be in the likeness of God, is to hate evil. To not hate evil is to be as the lax herd, lost in their fornication and slaves to their impulses, indifferent to the forces of darkness and careless before storms of the sinister, being serious about what is superficial, and humorous before the devil, for "It is as sport to a fool to do mischief: but a man of understanding hath wisdom." (Proverbs 10:23)</p><p>But please do not assume that I am saying that only Christians are humans and the rest animals. Do not think that I do not know that endless are the multitudes of those who put upon themselves the title of Christian, and are more savage and depraved than any heathen. I fight more against those who call themselves Christians, than anyone else.</p><p>There are Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists more righteous than many so-called Christians out there. We have had Muslims in Pakistan help us protect Christians from Islamic persecution, in our rescue mission; and when we have brought persecuted Christians from Pakistan into Thailand, we have had Buddhists help house them, and supposed Christians refuse to help us. When we brought Christians from Pakistan into Sri Lanka, Buddhist lawyers helped the Christians to get residency in the country. I will tell you this now, that these nonbelievers are closer to God than the "born again Bible believing Christian" who sees his brethren being persecuted and callously does nothing. To them can we say with Christ, "That the publicans and the harlots go into the kingdom of God before you." (Matthew 21:32)</p><p>The Samaritans rejected all of the books of the Bible except for the Five Books of Moses (See St. John of Damascus, On Heresies, 9), they as well did not consider the Temple to be the legitimate sanctuary of God. They made an evil alliance with Antiochus Epiphanies when he tyrannized Israel and desecrated the Temple; they changed the Tenth Commandment to be about the sanctity of Mount Gerizim. In other words, they were heretics, and were not orthodox in their theology.</p><p>So much anger did the Jews have for them, that we read in the Gospel that the Samaritan woman told Christ, "the Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans." (John 4:9) And despite all of the corruptions of their theology, Christ uses a Samaritan in His parable on who is and who is not our brothers, after a sophistical lawyer asks Christ, "And who is my neighbour?" (Luke 10:29)</p><p>A man is beaten, almost to his death, and left on the side of the road. A priest comes, sees the anguishing man, and keeps walking. A Levite comes by, and callously continues on. But then a Samaritan passes by, and what made him different from the first two? In the words of Christ, "he had compassion on him" (Luke 10:33), and this compassion was evidenced through action. The Samaritan "went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him. And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee." (Luke 10:34-35)</p><p>What distinguishes the sons of God from the sons of Belial, is what distinguished the Samaritan from the two priests: love, for "He who does not love does not know God, for God is love." (1 John 4:8) There are many examples of good samaritans in our own modern times. During the Armenian Genocide, when the Muslim Ottoman Empire was slaughtering millions of Christians, there were cases in which Arab Muslims righteously rescued Armenian Christians from death. One Armenian family was brutally butchered by Ottomans, and there was only one survivor, a boy named <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://(http://www.sgvtribune.com/general-news/20141024/local-armenians-proud-orphan-rug-will-be-displayed-at-white-house-visitor-center" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Khatchik</a>, who was rescued by Arab Bedouins and lived with them for nine years before he left and joined a relief center for Armenians. As one scholar <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.classzone.com/books/wh_05_shared/pdf/two_day_lesson.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">notes</a>, "Some Armenians were rescued by Bedouins and other Arabs who sympathized with the Armenian situation. Sympathetic Turkish families also risked their own lives to help their Armenian neighbors escape."</p><p>Such righteous people were good samaritans. They follow God without knowing it, for they emulate God to the best of their ability. They do not prove that Islam is peaceful, but that the compassion that kindled within their souls transcended the evil teachings of Islam, and flamed so hot with the flames of love, that they burned away whatever corruptions Islam could have brought. They were righteous deeds, and such noble acts were done by God through the hands of these people.</p><p>This is why I do not like the vague talk that I hear sometimes, such as, "Lets get guns and shoot Muslims at random." Or "Lets kill the Muslims and pour pig's blood on them." Such talk is devoid of intelligence, and the intentions behind them are neither said for Christianity, but for some dry system of conservatism. What about these Muslims who rescued Christians, kill them too? Saddam protected the Christians, and when America killed him the conservatives were acting as though they won some sort of a crusade. Gaddafi was a Muslim who protected Christians, and America brought him to the slaughter. Mubarak was Muslim, and protected Christians, and look how America encouraged a mob to overthrow him, thus enabling the Muslims to kill Copts. Assad is a Muslim who is protecting the Christians, and look how the Western forces are working to get rid of him!</p><p>Even when the Israelites came to Canaan to massacre the Canaanites, they spared Rahab because she was righteous, and they spared the Hivites because they desired peace with Israel. Secular conservatism is of a diabolical nature; it tries to portray a facade of some Christian morality, but it is filled with a very callous view of humanity.</p><p>Christianity is now identified with GOP politics and materialism. I remember in one argument I saw about illegal immigration. My father and I were in a car with a woman, who is very much into this way of thinking, and her husband. We saw a Mexican man selling ice cream, and she pointed her finger at him saying, "You see this guy here, he is probably illegal!" My father asked her: "A Muslim comes into America to conspire and support terrorism, but he is legal; another, a Mexican man selling ice cream on the streets, lives in America but he is illegal, but has no ill will. Which one do you prefer?" She coldly said, "The Muslim, he is legal." She said this even though she could not stand Muslims.</p><p>Another horrifying story creeps into my memory. A boat filled with Christians and Muslims was traveling from Africa to Italy, and the Muslims seized twelve of the Christians, threw them off the boat, and laughed as they watched them drown to death. The Italian government was compassionate enough to accept the rest of the Christians and arrest the Islamic perpetrators. I remember seeing conservatives in America say that the Christians deserved to drown, that there should be no sympathy for them, and that the Italians should have never accepted them, because they were "illegal immigrants." Such people who express themselves this way, do not know God, but worship a false, mechanical, callous, cold and deistical god, who runs like a ticking clock, only functioning like a machine, without a single drop of compassion.</p><p>All of the tears of the world could not stir this god to sympathy, for it is a devil. The God of Christianity, however, has passion, emotions, anger, jealously, and love, and He honors the nonbeliever who has love, over the "conservative" who could not shed tears for martyred Christians. Such is the purpose of the parable of the Good Samaritan: to show the callousness of self-esteemed people who think they are righteous because they mechanically follow some set of rules set up by societal tradition, and accepted as "conservative." These supposed "conservatives" will show more love towards "gay people" and politicians who lie to their faces, than they would suffering Christians because they are "illegal," or even righteous Muslims just because they are "rag heads."</p><p>Human beings are born with sinful nature, and thus any good that man does is done by God through him. As the Italian mystic, Lorenzo Scupoli, said:</p><blockquote><p>There is nothing He [God] loves and desires to see in us more than a sincere consciousness of our nothingness and a firm and deep-felt conviction that any good we may have in our nature and our life comes from Him alone, since He is the source of all good, and that nothing truly good can ever come from ourselves, whether a good thought or a good action. (The Unseen Warfare, ch. 2, trans. E. Kadloubovsky & G.E.H. Palmer)</p></blockquote><p>Thus when man does good, that goodness comes from God, and he is only the instrument by which the righteous act is accomplished. It is quite ineffably beautiful, and truly something of wonder: man, with all passion and enthusiasm, does good, but it is God that is working through him, and he is but the paintbrush of this immaculate painting of Providence.</p><p>We must destroy Islam, but this does not mean we destroy all Muslims. We fight Islam by declaring Christianity as superior to Islam, and through the Christianization of society (which at times require the use of force), we bring the Muslim world into the fold of Christendom. The power of Islam in the Islamic world must be destroyed through military force, and once the authority of Islam is broken and tendered, then that is when the preachers of the Gospel are sent, to bring the Muslims into the Church. This is what the Conquistadors did when they invaded Mexico.</p><p>This would be love, for it is done -- not to mock and cruelly kill people -- but to bring man into enlightenment. It is done in union with God, and by God, with man simply being the instrument of divine justice. The warrior is filled with love, because he has God, and through him, the enemies of light are crushed. "God has broken through my enemies by my hand like a breakthrough of water." (1 Chronicles 14:11)</p><p>With this said I would like to add a reflection on Mother's Day:</p><p>While everyone is wishing each other a happy Mother's Day, we are forgetting to give our felicitations to the most important mother who ever lived, and that is Mary, the Mother of God in the flesh. She succeeded where Eve -- the first mother -- failed, by giving the utmost of obedience to the cause of mankind's redemption and forsaking the pernicious desires of the flesh</p><p>"A sword will pierce through your own soul" (Luke 2:34), foretold Simeon to Mary, and surely did she suffer this travail.</p><p>From her womb, came the One Who all of existence could not contain; from her womb came the One for Whom the heavens were made, through Whom the endless cosmos sail across the oceans of stars, and to Whom the vast seas of numberless universes give their adulations. In her womb did Humanity and Eternity become one; in her womb did despair and glory unite.</p><p>Before her eyes lied the Man Child; before her eyes our Hope; before her eyes our Salvation; before her eyes the Savior made water into wine, and before her eyes shall the Eternal King tread "the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God." (Revelation 19:15)</p><p>John saw her in her glory, "a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a garland of twelve stars." (Revelation 12:1) The stars were above her head, because she, being the mother of the King, is the queen of the Church. Since Christ identifies Himself with His Church, Mary then is the mother of the Church. And so twelve stars, representing the twelve Disciples, and thus the Church, represent her royal position in Christendom.</p><p>The moon is under her feet, because the Church, headed by Christ, through Christ, and for Christ, her Son, crushes the crescent moon idols of the Antichrist, for in the end shall the armies of the Cross make the enemy "like Oreb, and like Zeeb: yea, all their princes as Zebah, and as Zalmunna", when Gideon took down the crescent idols of the pagans.<br />Mary is clothed with the light of glory, because she abided in Christ more than anyone, giving birth to the Holy One, obtaining what the Savior promised to His servants, "ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love." (John 15:10)</p><p>Mary abided in love, giving birth to Love Incarnate. Mary's abiding in God, Who is Love, did not end with her death, but continues on in eternity.</p>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Muslim Man Rescues Sixty-Four Christians From Being Beheaded By Jihadist Terrorists

A Muslim man in the Philippines, named Noor Lucman, rescued 64 Christians by hiding them in his home, as ISIS terrorists were searching for victims to slaughter. According to Lucman, if the terrorists would have found them, they would have been …

Read More...»