The World Is Heading Towards Armageddon As The Major Military Powers Of The Earth Prepare For War. Great Britain, Germany, Turkey, Hungary, And The Major Military Powers Of The Earth Are All Preparing For World War Three

<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/arms-race.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter wp-image-113887" height="624" sizes="(max-width: 793px) 100vw, 793px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/arms-race.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/arms-race.jpg 610w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/arms-race-300x236.jpg 300w" width="793" /></a></p><p><strong>By Theodore Shoebat and Walid Shoebat (Shoebat Sunday Special) </strong></p><p><strong>War is nigh. The world is racing towards Armageddon. Right before our eyes we are seeing the beginning stages of the start of a major world war. Arms races, nationalism and militarism are growing with more intensity every year. Hungary and Germany are supporting the restoration of militarism, reminding us of the German Hungarian alliance in the First World War. Turkey is being given more and more power in the Middle East, reminding us of the Ottoman Empire which has been an ally of Germany since 1871, and joined Germany in its war of imperialism and racial domination in the First World War. This is all a sign that another great war between the major powers of the earth is looming. </strong></p><p>But the world has been distracted with other things. From 2014 to 2015, everybody was focusing on ISIS and Christian persecution. But this died out in late 2016, especially with the victory of the Trump campaign.</p><p>The media has not been giving the same amount of coverage that it used to on the war in Syria. The world has been practically ignoring Syria. Headlines are now popping up about how the Syrian government just retook Deir-ez-zor from Islamic terrorists, and now the only area under the control of Islamic jihadists is the Idlib province. There is much talk about how all of this is a sign that the US is failing in its regime change objective in Syria.</p><p>Why is Syria no longer such a huge headline? I remember how in the years of 2014 and 2015, ISIS, Syria and Iraq were extremely popular topics. By the middle of 2016, we began to see the subjects of ISIS, Syria and Iraq, waning. By the end of 2016, the story of ISIS and Christian persecution in the Middle East was on life support, and people turned their eyes from it only to gaze up with all their attention towards the victory of Donald Trump. By 2017, interest in the subject of the situation in the Middle East, fell into a coma. It did not die out, it still remained alive, with only a few people here and there giving their regards.</p><p>What happened? Did all of the horrible things happening in Syria and Iraq suddenly stop? No, its just that the media'a attention on the situation has shifted. People's interest are determined by the media. The ones who control the media know this, and so they have been distracting their attention to other matters. So what is taking place underneath the headlines?</p><p>The reason why, I believe, they are not focusing so much on Syria and Iraq anymore, is because the US and NATO are now giving power to Turkey to control the region. As the Daily Beast <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/as-syria-rebels-learn-from-media-the-cia-cut-them-off-al-qaeda-goes-on-the-offensive">wrote</a> a number of months ago:</p><blockquote><p>One Syrian opposition news agency reported an unnamed rebel commander saying that U.S. support will continue for a few months and then move to a new mechanism. The commander added that the U.S. is pressuring rebels to unify under a joint military command before resuming support. There is also the possibility that Turkey and Qatar would fill the breach.</p></blockquote><div><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.trtworld.com/middle-east/russia-stops-turkey-in-its-path-as-it-plans-possible-ypg-attack-10330">There is a new army</a> of Islamic terrorists in Syria, and it was created with the help of Turkey, It consists of 50,000 fighters, and their base is in Gaziantep, Turkey. Not only is this army receiving support from Turkey, but from Saudi Arabia and Qatar as well. The army is also composed of a jihadist battalion called Ahrar al Sham, which is considered to be a terrorist organization by Russia.</div><div></div><div>This huge force of 50,000 men did not happen by accident, and it is quite obvious that NATO is behind it, given the fact that the US and its allies have been so involved in training and arming terrorist rebels. NATO has been arming and supporting Turkey since the late 40s, and if we are going to discuss this reality its important to know the ideology behind it. One cannot comprehend the magnitude of the destiny of mankind heading towards Armageddon, until one reads the history of the ideologies that interconnect together and manifest in the fullness of the diabolical conspiracy of the Antichrist.</div><p>A very dangerous and popular ideology that we will see continue to rise is pan-Turkism, or the belief that the Turkic race is the superior race, and that all of the Turkic races, from parts of China (the Uighurs), to Central Asia (Kazakstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, etc) and Turkey (really biblically Gog and Magog), must unite together. During the Second World War, Pan-Turkish activists in Turkey openly supported Hitler and the Nazis. In 1942, the Pan-Turkish nationalists sent soldiers into the Caucasian border, where Russia and Turkey meet, to support the Nazis against the Soviet Union.</p><p>In 1991, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Turkish nationalists believed that it was their time to rise up, and Pan-Turkish organizations believed in establishing a Turkish ethno-state in Azerbaijan, which is interesting given the fact that this was one of the central territories of the Seljukian Turks, the founders of the first Turkish empire.</p><p>After the Second World War, the Americans were, supposedly, very worried about the Soviet Union expanding into Europe. They saw Turkey as a great defense against the Soviets, because Turkey is geographically the closest NATO nation to Moscow, while at the same time it is right within the same region of the oil countries of the Middle East. The US became fixated on embedding Turkey into the anti-Soviet bloc, and so it became a central nation of NATO's <em>Gladio</em> program, which was a series of operations done by the CIA and other Western European secret service agencies, in which they commissioned Nazi leaders of the Third Reich to recruit neo-Nazis and pan-Europeanists to commit terrorist attacks. The plan was to then blame the attacks on far-Left terrorists with the objective of stirring nationalist sentiment against the Soviet Union. (I have written extensively on Operation Gladio and how it is still continuing through major think-tanks and movements like the Counterjihad. You can read about it by clicking <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/07/02/how-the-anti-islam-movement-was-created-by-the-cia-and-very-powerful-eugenist-elites-to-advance-nazism-eugenics-paganism-and-genocidal-ideology/">here</a>).</p><p>Turkey right now is the second most armed nation within NATO. Why is this? Because the US armed Turkey to the teeth as part of the Gladio operation, so that Turkey will be able to fight Russia in the future. As Swiss historian Daniele Ganser has written:</p><blockquote><p>"As Turkey furthermore guarded a third of NATO's total borders with Warsaw Pact countries, the Turkish elite became an excellent defense contractor for the United States military industry and recipient of billions in US aid. Armed by the United States during the Cold War, Turkey set up the largest armed forces in Europe, and the second largest in NATO after the United States. In a reckless gamble the United States in 1961 stationed even nuclear missiles in Turkey targeting the Soviet Union." (Ganser, NATO's Secret Armies, ch. 17, p. 225)</p></blockquote><p>Turkey is the second most armed country within NATO because the United States made it that way. It is similar to what the US, under the Trump administration, has been doing, giving more power to Turkey in the Middle East, and also allowing Japan to increase its military capacity, and by encouraging Germany to increase spending on its military. All of this, like Gladio, is being done under a pretext to (so they say) combat Russian expansion. It makes you wonder if Gladio ever ended. The CIA claims that the operation was disbanded in 1990, but that was said only after the Italian prime minister, Giulio Andreotti, became the first politician to expose Gladio before the press.</p><p>When we see what is happening before us, with the US arming neo-Nazis in Ukraine, allowing Japan and Germany to build up their militaries, and giving leeway to Turkish expansion, it makes you wonder if the plan is really combating Russia. From all of this, it appears that the masterplan truly is eugenics, genocide, population control, and the ascending evil of racialist nationalism and world empire. The US is only creating a frankenstein, a frankenstein that it will soon have to fight in the future in which God "will bring strangers upon thee, the terrible of the nations: and they shall draw their swords against the beauty of thy wisdom, and they shall defile thy brightness." (Ezekiel 28:7) It is only then that the US will unite with Russia, as it did in the past against the Germans in both World Wars.</p><p>When the US was working to use Turkey as a major player for the Gladio operation, the Americans wanted to use the violent pan-Turkist movement to foment anti-Soviet hatred. The American government decided to use a key figure within the racist pan-Turkist circle, Alparslan Türkeş. During the Second World War, Turkes was a Nazi operative who worked as the contact for the German Nazis in Turkey.</p><div id="attachment_113877" style="width: 692px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/alparslan-turkes.jpg"><img alt="" class="size-full wp-image-113877" height="350" sizes="(max-width: 682px) 100vw, 682px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/alparslan-turkes.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/alparslan-turkes.jpg 682w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/alparslan-turkes-300x154.jpg 300w" width="682" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Alparslan Türkeş</p></div><p>Turkes was convinced of the Darwinist and eugenist race theories of the Nazis, and in his speeches he would quote from Hitler's <em>Mein Kampf.</em> When we speak of fascism, we usually think of Benito Mussolini emulating Hitler. But what we rarely talk about are the Muslim Turkish nationalists who also emulated Hitler. Look no further than to Nihal Atsiz. Around the same time as Turkes, there was another Turkish nationalist leader by the name of <span style="color: #000000;"><span class="irc_pt" dir="ltr">Nihal</span><span class="irc_pt" dir="ltr"> Atsı</span><span class="irc_pt" dir="ltr">z, who obsessed over Hitler so much that he, like the Alt-Right fanatics of our time, wanted to look like him. Here is his photo:</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000;"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Hüseyin-Nihal-Atsız-1.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-113874" height="412" sizes="(max-width: 517px) 100vw, 517px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Hüseyin-Nihal-Atsız-1.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Hüseyin-Nihal-Atsız-1.jpg 517w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Hüseyin-Nihal-Atsız-1-300x239.jpg 300w" width="517" /></a>   </span></p><p>The syncretism between Sufi Islam, Pan-Turkism and Nazism, was the fitting formula for an anti-Soviet movement. One CIA document from 1949 said that Turkey is an "extremely favourable territory for the establishment of both guerrilla units and Secret Army Reserves. Politically the Turks are strongly nationalistic and anti-Communistic, and the presence of the Red Army in Turks will cause national feeling to run high." Turkes was no small deal. He became the main contact for the CIA in their Gladio operation. As the CIA trained the Taliban against the Soviets, so the US would do the same with these Turkish racists. In 1948, Turkes made contacts with the CIA, and, it is said, upon being given orders by the CIA, he began to set up a nationalist paramilitary group in Turkey.</p><p>Turkes traveled to the United States where he made connections with people from both the Pentagon and the CIA. From 1955 to 1958, Turkes worked within Washington as part of NATO's mission in Turkey. By 1952, Turkes had already established a paramilitary organization called <em>Seferberlik Taktik Kurulu, </em>or <em>Tactical Location Mobilization Group</em>. The base for this paramilitary entity was the CIA building, American Yardim Heyeti, or the American Aid Delegation, located in the Bahceliever district of the Turkish capital of Ankara. In 1965, the Tactical Mobilization group was restructured and given a new name, <em>Special Warfare Department</em>.</p><p>These squads would be used to conduct false flag attacks to spark nationalism in Turkey. For example, in 1955, Turkish agents threw a bomb into the Mustafa Kemal Museum in Thessalloniki in Greece. The bomb exploded and became a popular headline. The Turkish government and press then blamed the attack on Greeks. Racist hatred erupted, and Turkish nationalists then used the story to justify going on a killing craze and a rape spree. On September 6th and 7th, 1955, in the cities of Istanbul and Izmir, Turkish nationalist gangs destroyed hundreds of Greek homes, murdered sixteen Greeks and raped 200 Greek women. Priests were also scalped and burnt in their beds. According to a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Istanbul_pogrom#cite_note-Congress1956-42">report</a> made by the United States Congress:</p><blockquote><p> <q>Greek priests were reported circumcised, scalped, burned In bed; Greek women raped. ... Just 9 out of 80 Greek Orthodox churches In Istanbul were left undesecrated; 28 were demolished. </q></p></blockquote><p>Here are photos of the mob and its violence:</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/futuristika_6-7-eylül_185.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-113878" height="503" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/futuristika_6-7-eylül_185.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/futuristika_6-7-eylül_185.jpg 800w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/futuristika_6-7-eylül_185-300x189.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/futuristika_6-7-eylül_185-768x483.jpg 768w" width="800" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/0000286236.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-113879" height="513" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/0000286236.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/0000286236.jpg 800w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/0000286236-300x192.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/0000286236-768x492.jpg 768w" width="800" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/utan-4.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-113880" height="517" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/utan-4.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/utan-4.jpg 800w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/utan-4-300x194.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/utan-4-768x496.jpg 768w" width="800" /></a></p><p>In 1965, Turkes founded the extreme right <em>National Action Party</em> (Millietci Hareket Partisi). The party's "youth organization" was actually its armed wing, the notoriously violent Grey Wolves. Their creed was that the superior race of the earth was the Turkish race. The magazine of the Grey Wolves, <em>Bozkurt</em>, declared the racist tenets of the organization:</p><blockquote><p>"Who are we? We are the members of the Grey Wolf (Bozkurtcu). What is our ideology? The Turkism of the Grey Wolf (Bozkurt).What is the creed of the Bozkurtcu? They believe, that the Turkish race and the Turkish nation is superior. What is the source of this superiority? The Turkish blood."</p></blockquote><div id="attachment_113881" style="width: 667px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/ulkucu-baskan-costuUlku.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-113881" height="353" sizes="(max-width: 657px) 100vw, 657px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/ulkucu-baskan-costuUlku.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/ulkucu-baskan-costuUlku.jpg 480w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/ulkucu-baskan-costuUlku-300x161.jpg 300w" width="657" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Grey Wolves with their hand sign</p></div><p>The Grey Wolves see violence as not just a holy principle (Jihad), but a natural part of human struggle, denoting its own Hiterlian Social-Darwinist ideology. The Grey Wolves declared:</p><blockquote><p>"War? Yes, war, if necessary. War is a great and holy principle of nature. We are the sons of warriors. The Bozkurtcu believe that war, militarism and heroism should receive the highest possible esteem and praise."</p></blockquote><p>In 2015, Ülkü Ocaklar, a member of the Grey Wolves, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://horizonweekly.ca/en/69185-2/">called</a> for hunting down Armenians:</p><blockquote><p>“What should we do now? Should we start a hunt for Armenians in the streets of Kars?”</p></blockquote><p>Racism and eugenics were part, and are still part of the ideology of the Turkish elites ruling Turkey. One thing we must understand is that the belief system of Turkey is not Wahabi Islam, but really a mixture of Turkish nationalism, racial theory, and Sufi Islam, or a mystical Islam greatly influenced by the works of Jalal al-Din al-Rumi.</p><p>This mixture of Islam, eugenics, nationalism and Nazism, will arise again in a very dangerous syncretism.</p><p style="text-align: center;"><strong>TURKEY AND GERMANY </strong></p><p>There is much talk about how Germany and Turkey are having a spat. But while the headlines distract you with this idea, German officials are meeting with the Turkish military as part of NATO policy in the Middle East. There is a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_146773.htm">report</a> from NATO that just came out last night that speaks of how NATO, specifically Germany, is providing support to Turkey in Syria and Iraq:-</p><blockquote><p>“<em>I am pleased to have led this useful visit to Konya</em>,” the Deputy Secretary General said. “<em>NATO AWACS aircraft are playing a vital role in support of Turkey and the Coalition to Defeat ISIS. It has been a privilege to meet the men and women carrying out this important mission</em>,” Ms. Gottemoeller added.</p><p>The delegation comprising German parliamentarians and NATO staff was received at Konya airbase by Turkish diplomatic and military officials and General Dawn Dunlop, Commander of the NATO AWACS fleet. Ms. Gottemoeller and the members of parliament toured the airbase, received operational briefings and met with air crews, including German Air Force staff, stationed there.</p><p>Konya airbase, around 250 kilometres south of Ankara, has served as a forward operating base for NATO AWACS surveillance aircraft since the 1980s in addition to its national role as a Turkish military facility. The base took on added importance to NATO operations due to the turmoil in neighboring Syria and Iraq. <strong>NATO AWACS operating out of Konya conduct patrols in support of Turkey and the Counter-ISIS Coalition</strong>. About 50 NATO military personnel are currently stationed at the base.</p></blockquote><p>All of this talk about Germany and Turkey having a 'strained' relationship, is all good cop/bad cop talk being done as a show to distract people. There is no strained relationship between Germany and Turkey. While headlines keep trying to convey this message that Germany and Turkey are beginning to hate each other, German troops and officials are in Konya Airbase in Turkey. Merkel has said that if she wins in the upcoming election in Germany that she will end the EU accession negotiations for Turkey. Even if this is true, it means nothing. As Turkish political analyst Semih Idiz <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://en.mehrnews.com/news/127622/Turkey-Germany-manage-relation-not-to-break-totally">said</a> recently:</p><blockquote><p>So she is saying, for example that she will try and convince the other members states on Turkey, but has not said that Germany will veto Turkey’s membership negotiations, which Germany has a right to do. France, for example, which is also opposed to Turkey’s membership, has vetoed chapters in the negotiation process that have to do with full membership, and is only allowing chapters which will boost Turkish-EU ties further but with guarantee membership for Ankara.</p></blockquote><p>Since 1871, Germany and Turkey have been allies. When the Protestant Reformation broke out in Germany in the 16th century, it was the Ottoman Empire that made alliances with Protestants throughout Europe in their fight against the Catholic Hapsburg Empire. This religious and political relationship, with such a long history, is not going to end now because Merkel said so. Lets not forget that when Merkel became chancellor in 2010, she said that multiculturalism has 'utterly failed.' She then was pro-diversity in 2014, when Germany and Turkey cooperatively facilitated the refugee situation in Europe. In 2016 she <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38226081">said</a> that she would back a burka ban in schools, courts and other state buildings. The only reason why she said that was because of the anti-Muslim sentiment that has been rising in Europe due to the migration crises that she helped start. You are seeing the Hegelian dialectic taking place right before your eyes. They create problems and then present themselves as the solution. Its all a game for power. Now we are in 2017, and she is playing as the nationalist who would stop Turkey from joining the EU. Are we really to believe this woman?</p><p>Remember what happened in WW1, Germany, the Ottoman Empire and the Austro-Hungarians were allies against the Americans and the Entente. I believe that in this revival of the Ottoman Empire, we will also witness the rise of Germany and Hungary.</p><p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;"><b>THE COMING HUNGARIAN, TURKO-GERMANIC ALLIANCE </b></span></p><p><span style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;">Look at Viktor Orban, the prime minister of Hungary. Since 2014, he and his party, </span><em style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;">Fidesz, </em><span style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;">has been adulated by the right wing in both Europe and America because they have expressed themselves so much against accepting migrants, and so much in favor for nationalism and helping persecuted Christians. We at shoebat.com, in the beginning, fell for this trick. In fact, the Hungarian government invited our organization, Rescue Christians, to participate in a meeting on rescuing oppressed Christians. As it turned out, it was all a media front. The Hungarian government wasn't planning on helping anybody, and asked our director Keith Daives to sign a statement that the Hungarian government is helping Christians. Keith refused. We found out about Fidesz's jingoist sentiments. The co-founder of Orban's Fidesz party, Zsolt Bayer</span><strong style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;">, </strong><a style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/hungarian-journalist-says-roma-should-not-be-allowed-to-exist-a-876887.html">called</a><span style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;"> for the purging of all gypsies from Hungary "regardless of the means":</span></p><blockquote><p>"A significant part of the Roma are unfit for coexistence. They are not fit to live among people. These Roma are animals, and they behave like animals. When they meet with resistance, they commit murder. They are incapable of human communication. Inarticulate sounds pour out of their bestial skulls. At the same time, these Gypsies understand how to exploit the 'achievements' of the idiotic Western world. But one must retaliate rather than tolerate. These animals shouldn't be allowed to exist. In no way. That needs to be solved -- immediately and regardless of the method."</p></blockquote><div id="attachment_113882" style="width: 710px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/bayer-e1421421218205.jpg"><img alt="" class="size-full wp-image-113882" height="400" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/bayer-e1421421218205.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/bayer-e1421421218205.jpg 700w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/bayer-e1421421218205-300x171.jpg 300w" width="700" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Zsolt Bayer</p></div><p>Anti-Gypsy sentiment is something always found in Nazis. "But," says the typical blog commenter, "Viktor Orban is defending his people from the migrants and wants to keep Hungary for the Hungarians. He is a good nationalist! How dare you go against him!" You may feel this way all you like, it does not change the way things are. Putting our emotionalism aside, the bottom line is that where you have nationalism, you have genocidal ideologies. Viktor Orban, while playing his role as the good nationalist, is totally in favor for a militarist Germany and European Union. Just recently, the president of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, said that Europe can no longer rely on America for protection, and because Great Britain has decided to leave the EU, nations within the European Union must increase their military capacity. That means a militarist Germany, and a massive increase in military manufacturing. Junker said:</p><blockquote><p>"The protection of Europe can no longer be outsourced. Even our biggest military powers – and I could count them on one, maximum two – cannot combat all the challenges and threats alone”<span style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;"> </span></p></blockquote><div class="mw-body-content">Hans-Peter Bartels, the German parliament’s Commissioner for the Armed Forces, said in June <em>“there will be a European army in the end,” </em>destined to unite <em>“disorganized, technically fragmented and duplicate structures.”</em></div><div></div><div><div id="attachment_113883" style="width: 520px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/media.media_.6bd54c49-1d09-467c-9f97-9ae9eb1ec430.normalized.jpeg"><img alt="" class="size-full wp-image-113883" height="335" sizes="(max-width: 510px) 100vw, 510px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/media.media_.6bd54c49-1d09-467c-9f97-9ae9eb1ec430.normalized.jpeg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/media.media_.6bd54c49-1d09-467c-9f97-9ae9eb1ec430.normalized.jpeg 510w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/media.media_.6bd54c49-1d09-467c-9f97-9ae9eb1ec430.normalized-300x197.jpeg 300w" width="510" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Hans-Peter Bartels</p></div></div><div></div><div class="mw-body-content">Angela Merkel is also in favor for a militarist Germany. She had a meeting last year in which this issue was discussed, and who agreed with her? It was the darling of the right-wing, Viktor Orban, who <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rt.com/news/400327-juncker-us-eu-army/">said</a> in the meeting:</div><div></div><blockquote><div><span style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;">"We should list the issue of security as a priority, and we should start setting up a common European army"</span></div></blockquote><div></div><div>This is the "right-wing nationalist" for you. From being nationalists, they will make themselves internationalists for their own vision of world empire. So many people got swept away into the deception that good innocent and nationalist Hungary is simply fighting for its people, as if such an ideal exists in present day governments. Apparently, people are ignoring history, ignoring the fact that the US and the Entente had a major world war, the First World War, against Germany, the Ottoman Empire, and the Austro-<strong>Hungarian</strong> Empire. Hungary was on the side of Antichrist in World War One, and we think, because of some superficially accepted perception of nationalism, that this evil has all of a sudden gone away. One thing to remember is that Orban and those like him are pan-Turkists who see a racial and cultural affinity with Turkey and all Turkic nations.</div><div></div><div>In June of 2017, Viktor Orban delivered a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.miniszterelnok.hu/prime-minister-viktor-orbans-speech-at-the-turkish-hungarian-business-forum/">speech</a> at the Hungarian-Turkish Business Forum in Ankara, to talk about the importance of relations between Hungarian and Turkish industrialists. In his speech, Orban talked about both the racial relations and the need for deeper economic ties between Turkey and Hungary:</div><div></div><blockquote><div> Turkey is in a good location, and although there are now wars on its borders, strategically it is in one of the world’s most important locations. It has an enormous private sector. Why should it pay any attention to the Hungarians – aside from friendship and the intellectually intriguing question of <strong>common origins lost in the mists of ancient history</strong>? Why should any member of its business community divert their gaze to Hungary? I believe that there is one fact which even the most successful Turkish businesspeople would be wise to consider: Hungary is a country of ten million, and we are capable of generating exports worth 110 billion dollars; meanwhile Turkey is a country of eighty million, which is capable of generating exports worth 145 billion dollars.</div></blockquote><div><div id="attachment_113884" style="width: 628px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Victor-orban.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-113884" height="430" sizes="(max-width: 618px) 100vw, 618px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Victor-orban-1024x713.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Victor-orban-1024x713.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Victor-orban-300x209.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Victor-orban-768x534.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Victor-orban.jpg 1200w" width="618" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Viktor Orban</p></div><p> </p></div><div>Later in the speech Orban again brought up a common racial origin between Hungarians and Turks:</div><div><blockquote><p>To sum up, <strong>we have the legend of common Turkish-Hungarian origins</strong>. We have mutual respect. We have an outstanding political and personal relationship between the leaders of the two countries. We have an enormous Turkey and a strengthening Central Europe. And we have a Hungarian investment and business environment without rival in Europe.</p></blockquote></div><div><p>Most in the West do not know that the Hungarians are a Turkic people, and the nationalists have a grandiose and delusional pride about being Turkic and related to the peoples of Central Asia. Each year in Hungary, there is the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.voxeurop.eu/en/content/article/2531811-viktor-orban-seeks-salvation-asia">Kurultáj</a> event, a festival where Hungarians, alongside various tribes and Turkic peoples, get together to celebrate their Turkic roots. In 2012, Vice-chairman for Orban's Fidesz party, Sándor Leszák, welcomed tribal leaders in the National Assembly, and the Hungarian government, which was also dominated by Fidesz, funded the event with 70 million forints (about a quarter of a million US dollars).</p><p>Over a whopping quarter of a million people visited the town of Bugac to attend the Kurultaj event, celebrating the Turkish race. What makes this even more interesting is that the first Kurultáj did not take place in Hungary, but in Kazakstan, in 2007. Kazakstan is a Turkic country, and for Hungary to hold their first meeting celebrating 'Turkishness' in Kazakstan, reflects the Turanian ideology that Orban and the rest of the Hungarian nationalists follow.</p><p>The 2012 event included pagan rituals akin to Native Indian rites, with worship of a crescent moon idol:</p><p><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/kz_SvOCxtV0?start=510" width="660" height="440" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p></div><div></div><div>Orban and his ilk subscribe to the racial ideology of Turanism, or the belief in the superiority of the Turkic races. In 2012, Orban <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://hungarianspectrum.org/2012/07/27/hungarian-business-leade-criticizes-viktor-orbans-economic-policy/">described</a> Hungary as "half-Asian" and stated that Hungarians are the type of people who will unite together only by force:</div><div></div><blockquote><div><span style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;">“Cooperation is a question of force, not of intention. Perhaps there are countries where things don’t work that way, for example in the Scandinavian countries, but such a half-Asiatic rag-tag people as we are can unite only if there is force.”</span></div></blockquote><div></div><div>Orban has even stated that the Hungarians also have a racial and cultural relation with Japan. In a talk that he gave in the Suzuki building, he <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Chris_Moreh/publication/265865477_The_Asianization_of_national_fantasies_in_Hungary_A_critical_analysis_of_political_discourse/links/54f9be990cf25371374ff7df/The-Asianization-of-national-fantasies-in-Hungary-A-critical-analysis-of-political-discourse.pdf">said</a>:</div><div></div><blockquote><div>"Our clothes are slightly dingy, we are a little more disorganized, we have let ourselves go a bit in the past eight years, there are signs of decadence here and there, but we believed in the values on which your world is built, in honour, in diligence, in responsibility and in respect, and we can prove it. We, as members of the European Union, sail under western flag, but as you also know, we are an eastern nation, and for us, just as for you, the principal commandment is that every agreement has to be kept."</div></blockquote><div><div>In 2012, in the National Economy of Hungary, Minister György Matolcsy, expressed this belief even further, stating:</div><div></div><blockquote><div>We are proud of having come from Asia. On the bottom of our infants, in about 30 out of 100 cases, for six weeks there is a small red dot, just like in the case of Japanese babies. I have been told about this by Japanese scientists, I didn’t know before.[…] My point in mentioning this is just that sometimes others know more about us than we do. While talking with Chinese delegations many times a week, they all begin their talks saying that, well yes, between us there is some deep, deep, deep… maybe even kinship.</div></blockquote><div>This interconnects with the pan-Asianism of Turkey; for the Young Turks declared Turkey to be the “Japan of the Near East” (I wrote an article on pan-Asianism which can be read <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/08/15/japan-is-now-building-a-nuclear-power-plant-for-turkey-this-will-lead-to-turkey-owning-nuclear-weapons-and-the-worst-mass-genocide-of-christians/">here</a>).</div><div></div><div style="text-align: center;"><strong>ARMS RACES AND VISION 2023 </strong></div><div></div><div><span style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;">What was one of the significant situations happening prior to the First World War? Arms races between the major European powers. From 1905 to 1906, and in 1911, Great Britain and France held secret talks on how they would deal with a war with Germany. From 1908 to 1909, Germany and Austro-Hungary also held talks on how they would conduct a war against Russia. In 1912, Helmuth von Moltke, chief of Germany's general staff, wrote a memorandum addressed to the civilian Chancellor in which he said: "All sides are preparing for European War, which all sides expect sooner or later."</span></div></div><div></div><div>In May of 1914, just months before the outbreak of World War One on July 28th, 1914, Great Britain and Russia conducted a naval meeting. The Germans were supposedly terrified when they found out. Now, in our own time, w<span style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;">e are seeing the same pattern. We are currently witnessing the beginning stages of a major arms race taking place in Europe and Asia. Ask yourself, why is Great Britain currently </span>manufacturing<span style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;"> naval ships at an unusual intensity? Lets look at a number of very recent news pieces. One <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.yourshipbuildingnews.com/ambitious+future+for+naval+shipbuilding+in+the+uk_144926.html">ship news site says</a>:</span></div><div></div><blockquote><div><p><span style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;">Defence Secretary Sir Michael Fallon has unveiled an ambitious new National Shipbuilding Strategy which meets the challenge set by Sir John Parker last November and sets out plans for the first batch of Type 31e frigates.</span></p><p>Sir John Parker’s independent report into British naval shipbuilding proposed far-reaching recommendations to transform the UK maritime industry and boost the prosperity of regions, shipyards and maritime supply chains across the country.</p><p>Today’s Strategy sees the Government accept Sir John’s recommendations and step up to what he called a prospective ‘renaissance’ in British shipbuilding. Building on the Government’s industrial strategy, it outlines an ambition to transform the procurement of naval ships, make the UK’s maritime industry more competitive, grow the Royal Navy fleet by the 2030s, export British ships overseas, and boost innovation, skills, jobs, and productivity across the UK.</p><p>It announces the government’s plan to procure new Type 31e General Purpose Frigates. A price cap has been set of no more than £250M each for the first batch of five frigates. In line with standing UK policy on warships they will be built in the UK. They could be built in a way which could see them shared between yards and assembled at a central hub. <strong>The first ships are set to be in service by 2023.</strong> Shipyards will be encouraged to work with global partners to ensure the vessel is competitive on the export market.</p></div></blockquote><div><blockquote><p>Defence Secretary Sir Michael Fallon said:</p></blockquote></div><div><blockquote><p>“This new approach will lead to more cutting-edge ships for the growing Royal Navy that will be designed to maximise exports and be attractive to navies around the world.</p><p><span style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;">“Backed up by a commitment to spend billions on new ships, our plan will help boost jobs, skills, and growth in shipyards and the supply chain across the UK.”</span></p></blockquote></div><blockquote><div><p>The Strategy sets out the government’s commitment to work with industry to reinvigorate and maximise export success.  The Type 31e will be designed to meet the needs of the Royal Navy and with the export market in mind from the beginning. This could see industry’s customer become not only the Royal Navy but for the navies of Britain’s allies and partners.</p></div></blockquote><div><blockquote><p>The MOD is committed to new ships for the Royal Navy through its rising budget and £178bn equipment plan. In July, at BAE’s Govan shipyard, the Defence Secretary cut steel for the first of eight Type 26 frigates, HMS Glasgow. The £3.7 billion contract for the first three, the largest for naval ships this decade, will secure hundreds of high skilled jobs on the Clyde until 2035 and hundreds more in the supply chain across the UK.</p></blockquote><p>Notice what it says: "<strong>The first ships are set to be in service by 2023." </strong>This is the same date that Turkey to be a major world power, in its plan which it called the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_vision#Foreign_policy"><em>2023 Vision</em></a>. Britain's plan to use its new battle ships coincides with Turkey's vision of empire. This is not a coincidence, and corresponds with the reality of the approaching third world war.</p></div><div><p> Great Britain recently produced two new aircraft carriers, as we read in a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.itv.com/news/meridian/update/2017-09-08/i-name-this-ship-the-prince-of-wales/">report</a> released yesterday:</p><blockquote><p>The first of the Royal Navy's giant new aircraft carriers HMS Queen Elizabeth arrived in Portsmouth last month.</p><p>And the second - HMS Prince of Wales was officially named by the Duchess of Cornwall at a ceremony in Scotland.</p><p>She's due to arrive in Portsmouth within the next couple of years. Richard Jones reports.</p></blockquote></div><div>In another <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nwemail.co.uk/news/barrow/Boat-building-policy-needs-flexibility-says-Barrow-MP-e239912b-792b-4859-9e1d-494941bd699f-ds">report</a> that came out last night:</div><div><blockquote><p>The government has released its long-anticipated strategy for the future <span class="vm-hook-outer vm-hook-default vm-hook-inview vm-hook-inview"><span class="vm-hook">construction</span></span> of Royal Navy ships.</p><p>Drawn up by industrialist Sir John Parker, the strategy is designed to speed up and reduce the cost of Ministry of Defence projects.</p><p>The MoD has come under harsh criticism for bloated projects running hundreds of millions of pounds over budget, and dragging on much longer than intended.</p></blockquote></div><div>These two ships are, as one <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.thenational.ae/opinion/launch-of-giant-uk-carriers-show-major-shift-in-britain-s-future-approach-to-global-conflict-1.624602">report</a> puts it, "the biggest warships ever built in the Royal Navy’s illustrious history".</div><div></div><div>There is a video that was just released showing some of the new military technology that Britain has developed:</div><div></div><div><p><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/UC2XzmVCkPc" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p><p> </p><p>Why is Britain building all of this war technology? War is nigh. Its just like what took place prior to World War One; Winston Churchill and a small number of British officials knew that war was coming, but their knowledge was kept within their own circle, outside of the general populace.</p><p>The masses were shocked when war finally broke out in 1914. People did not think that a world war would take place, because they believed the lies that politicians made, that everything was peaceful. We marvelled at ourselves on account of our own innovation in technology. When the world erupted in blood shed, and men entered that long and dark fray in the trenches, the American novelist, Henry James, wrote of how deceived people once were, thinking that peace would be continuous:</p></div><blockquote><p>"The plunge of civilization into this abyss gives away the whole long age during which we have supposed the world to be ... is a thing that so gives away the whole long age during which we have supposed the world to be, with whatever abatement, gradually bettering, that to have to take it all now for what the treacherous years were all the while really making for and <em>meaning</em> is too tragic for any words." (See Fromkin, <em>Europe's Last Summer</em>, ch. 4)</p></blockquote><div>We, too, are looking upon ourselves with awe at our own technological innovations. But, Silicon Valley, the major center of technology, is also one of the centers of the world for advancing eugenics (as we have shown, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/07/30/for-the-first-time-in-american-history-scientists-are-editing-the-genetics-of-human-embryos-and-then-slaughtering-the-unborn-babies-this-is-only-going-to-lead-to-the-era-of-the-antichrist-and-the-ma/">here</a>, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/04/11/incredible-research-exposed-secret-us-documents-reveal-how-the-united-states-government-is-designing-the-plan-that-is-moving-the-world-towards-armageddon/">here </a> and <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/07/02/how-the-anti-islam-movement-was-created-by-the-cia-and-very-powerful-eugenist-elites-to-advance-nazism-eugenics-paganism-and-genocidal-ideology/">here</a>), as we can see with its industrialists, like Peter Thiel, Benjamin Horowitz, and <span style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;">Ron Unz. So today, we have the worship of innovation, alongside a widespread delusion that a world war will not happen again, and just like in the past, we are witnessing the beginning of an arms race between the major powers of the world. Its all a sign that war is to come. </span></div><div></div><div>I would like to end with this: Remember the film, <em>Saving Private Ryan</em>? It is truly a masterpiece of a film, the best war movie to have ever been done. But how many Americans even know that the original story of Tom Hank's character was of a Catholic priest named Fr. <span style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;">Francis L. Sampson, a regimental chaplain with the 505th Parachute Infantry Regiment, 82nd Airborne Division. He was commissioned by military authorities to find Fritz Niland, the real-life “Private Ryan,” who had lost his three brothers on D-Day. </span></div><div></div><div><span style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;">Fr. Sampson fought in the Battle of Normandy Beach, of which he recounted: “no pair of knees shook more than my own, nor any heart ever beat faster in times of danger.” He landed on Normandy beach by parachute. He lost his Mass Kitt and intensely searched for it until he could find it, which was extremely difficult with all of the gun fire coming from the Nazi enemies. </span></div><div><span style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;"><br />Days later, Fr. Sampson entered a church where some nurses were. The church had been devastated by bombs, and only two walls remained. But, there was beheld two images: one of St. Paul, the other of St. Peter. And a crucifix also remained intact. In this church, Fr. Sampson gave a homily, the words with which I will end this article: </span></div><div></div><blockquote><div><p><span style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;">The image of the naked Galilean hanging from the cross has always inspired great love and fierce hate. Nero sought to make the cross a hateful image by putting Christians to death upon it, pouring pitch upon them, and lighting Rome with these flaming human crosses. Julian the Apostate said that he would make the world forget the Man on the cross, but in his final agony he had to acknowledge, “Thou has conquered, Galilean.” Communists forbid its presence because they fear its power against their evil designs. Hitler has tried to replace the image of our Blessed Lord on the cross with a stupid swastika. Invectives, false philosophies, violence, and every diabolical scheme have been used to tear the Christ from the cross and the crucifix from the church. Nevertheless, like the bombs that were dropped on this chapel, they have only succeeded in making the cross stand out more and more in bold relief. The image we love grows greater in our understanding because of the vehemence of the hate it occasions in wicked men. Each of us has that sacred image stamped upon his soul. Like the chapel, we are Temples of God. And no matter how we are torn by the bombs of tragedy and trial and assault from without, the image of the crucified remains if we want it to. Now at the foot of this cross let us renew our baptismal vows. Let us promise to shield forever His image in our hearts.   </span></p></div></blockquote><div><div id="bodyContent" class="mw-body-content">

anonymous armageddon isis islam war The World Is Heading Towards Armageddon As The Major Military Powers Of The Earth Prepare For War. Great Britain, Germany, Turkey, Hungary, And The Major Military Powers Of The Earth Are All Preparing For World War Three

By Theodore Shoebat and Walid Shoebat (Shoebat Sunday Special) War is nigh. The world is racing towards Armageddon. Right before our eyes we are seeing the beginning stages of the start of a major world war. Arms races, nationalism and militaris…

Read More...»

Christianity Is In Decline Across America, Satanism Is Taking Its Place And Nobody Knows How To Stop The Rise

<p style="text-align: center"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/broken-church-building.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-113870" height="300" sizes="(max-width: 259px) 100vw, 259px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/broken-church-building-259x300.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/broken-church-building-259x300.jpg 259w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/broken-church-building.jpg 634w" width="259" /></a></p><p>A new report was released saying that Christians are in serious decline across the USA, especially with the Evangelicals:,</p><blockquote><p>White Christians in the US are in the minority and declining, amid increasing ethnic diversity and growing numbers of people who identify as religiously unaffiliated, according to a new survey.</p><p>The poll from the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) found that just 43 per cent of Americans now identify as white and Christian. This is in contrast to 81 per cent of Americans identifying as white Christians in 1976.</p><p>Past surveys have detailed a decline among Catholics in the US.</p><p>But what is most striking about the new PRRI survey is that it shows a relatively recent decline among evangelicals – from 23 per cent to 17 per cent from 2006 to 2016.</p><p>'This report provides solid evidence of a new, second wave of white Christian decline that is occurring among white evangelical Protestants just over the last decade in the US,' said Robert P Jones, the PRRI's CEO and author of The End of White Christian America.</p><p>'Prior to 2008, white evangelical Protestants seemed to be exempt from the waves of demographic change and disaffiliation that were eroding the membership bases of white mainline Protestants and white Catholics. We now see that these waves simply crested later for white evangelical Protestants.'</p><p>Today, fewer than half of all states are majority white Christian, the survey found. As recently as 2007, 39 states had majority white Christian populations.</p><p>As TIME magazine pointed out, the survey reinforces the findings of a separate one in 2015 by the Pew Research Center, which found that the number of white Christians in the US had fallen to 46 per cent.</p><p>Overall, a majority of Americans today are Christian, bolstered by a growing percentage of black and Hispanic believers.</p><p>At the same time, the new PRRI survey identified a specific decline in the percentage of Americans who identify as white Protestants — now at just 30 per cent.</p><p>And a further sign of the apparent, gradual decline of Christianity in the US comes with the fact that although non-Christian religions still account for less than 10 per cent of the American population, they are growing and are made up of higher percentages of young people, compared to the ageing group of white Christians.</p><p>The PRRI's director of research, Daniel Cox said: 'The young are much less likely to believe this is a "Christian nation" or to give preference to Christian identity. Young people and seniors are basically inhabiting different religious worlds.'</p><p>Almost a quarter (24 per cent) of Americans now identify as religiously unaffiliated, and around a third of those are under 30.</p><p>Meanwhile, around one in 10 white Catholics, evangelicals and mainline Protestants are under 30, compared with one-third of all Hindus and Buddhists.</p><p>Muslims and Mormons are the youngest faith groups in the US, with 42 per cent of all Muslims and nearly a quarter of all Mormons being under 30.</p><p>'Prior to 2008, white evangelical Protestants seemed to be exempt from the waves of demographic change and disaffiliation that were eroding the membership bases of white mainline Protestants and white Catholics. We now see that these waves simply crested later for white evangelical Protestants.'</p><p>Today, fewer than half of all states are majority white Christian, the survey found. As recently as 2007, 39 states had majority white Christian populations.</p><p>As TIME magazine pointed out, the survey reinforces the findings of a separate one in 2015 by the Pew Research Center, which found that the number of white Christians in the US had fallen to 46 per cent.</p><p>Overall, a majority of Americans today are Christian, bolstered by a growing percentage of black and Hispanic believers.</p><p>At the same time, the new PRRI survey identified a specific decline in the percentage of Americans who identify as white Protestants — now at just 30 per cent.</p><p>And a further sign of the apparent, gradual decline of Christianity in the US comes with the fact that although non-Christian religions still account for less than 10 per cent of the American population, they are growing and are made up of higher percentages of young people, compared to the ageing group of white Christians.</p><p>The PRRI's director of research, Daniel Cox said: 'The young are much less likely to believe this is a "Christian nation" or to give preference to Christian identity. Young people and seniors are basically inhabiting different religious worlds.'</p><p>Almost a quarter (24 per cent) of Americans now identify as religiously unaffiliated, and around a third of those are under 30.</p><p>Meanwhile, around one in 10 white Catholics, evangelicals and mainline Protestants are under 30, compared with one-third of all Hindus and Buddhists.</p><p>Muslims and Mormons are the youngest faith groups in the US, with 42 per cent of all Muslims and nearly a quarter of all Mormons being under 30.</p><p>Cox links this to the rise of conservative evangelicals – who oppose same sex marriage, abortion access and the legalisation of marijuana – and their alienating effect on the young.</p><p>'It is no longer the case among young people that being religious is necessarily a positive attribute,' said Cox.</p><p>The survey also shows that white Christians are a minority in the Democratic Party: fewer than one in three Democrats are white Christians, down from almost half 10 years ago.</p><p>And among Democrats under 30, only 14 per cent now identify as white Christian, while 40 per cent are 'nones'.</p><p>In the Republicans meanwhile, white evangelicals remain predominant, with more than one-third (35 per cent) of GOP supporters being white evangelicals.</p><p>Elsewhere, the survey found that almost half (46 per cent) of LGBT Americans are religiously unaffiliated — which is around twice as many as the general population (24 per cent).</p><p><strong>Rabbi Denise Eger, founding rabbi of the Kol Ami synagogue in West Hollywood and an LGBT activist, told the Catholic news website Crux that fundamentalism, especially in Christianity, Islam and, to a lesser extent, Judaism, was to blame for this.</strong></p><p><strong>'The truth is that all of religion becomes tainted, even though there are many denominations that welcome them, that it becomes "why bother?"'.</strong></p><p>Speaking about the rise of the 'nones,' Jennifer W Davidson, an associate professor of theology and worship at the American Baptist Seminary of the West, said that the rise in the religiously unaffiliated means people must now ask old questions in new ways.</p><p>'We need to begin asking people, "How do you make meaning in your life? What sustains you when you suffer? How do you cultivate a sense of wonder?"' she said.</p><p>'It is fully possible to answer these questions from a secular perspective, and if we asked them, we might be able to see abundantly fruitful connections among people who are religiously affiliated, religiously unaffiliated, secular, agnostic and atheist.'</p><p>The study, 'America's Changing Religious Identity,' contacted 101,000 Americans in 50 states, and has an overall margin of error of plus or minus 0.4 percentage points.</p><p>(<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.christiantoday.com/article/white.christians.in.america.are.a.declining.and.ageing.minority.new.survey.finds/113230.htm">source</a>)</p></blockquote><p>Yes, it is true there is a decline. But the problem is not a "rise in fundamentalism." When people use the term "fundamentalism" when discussing religion, it is almost always meant in the pejorative sense. "Religious fundamentalism" has been propagated to the public as such to conjure images of foolishness, ignorance, and blind obedience. With respect to the people who say this, much of this is indeed true, as there are many people, including people with good intentions, who act in ways that propagate ignorance or are just plain wrong but insist on doing so because they believe something is true without understanding why it is true outside of "I was told so." Now while religion is always in part an act of faith- believing that something is true because God has said so- it is also inseparable from reason and the consequences of the belief can be deduced by reason and proved or disproven by taking a systematic look at how one belief accords or does not accord with another belief.</p><p>Simply put, this is the union of "<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_14091998_fides-et-ratio.html">faith and reason</a>" that the Catholic Church so often speaks about. The purpose of this is to demonstrate not only how Faith is a real thing that can be proven, but that a man's actions are a direct product of his beliefs, and how to follow God more closely by belief one must also accord his actions as well. Likewise, and very importantly, the union of faith and reason provides a means for well-meaning people who may lack the intellectual capacity to understand detailed theology to execute the tenets of their faith in a way that is easy to understand, practical, and morally consistent. The proper union of faith and reason inevitably generates two results- one one hand it will allow for limitless commentary and explanation about matters of faith and being, and on the other hand as mentioned above, it distills complex ideas into easy to follow, fundamental beliefs and practices. Indeed, true fundamentalism- teaching and following the fundamentals of one's religion- is not a product of ignorance, but of very detailed and specific beliefs made simple to understand.</p><p>This idea was the inspiration for the title of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fundamentals">Fundamentals</a>, a series of American Protestant essay that were first published in 1909 meant to outline the fundamentals of Protestant Christianity. This was published around the same time the Popes were writing in similar ways. Both were meant to combat the idea of "modernism," which is essentially Darwinian philosophy applied to religion, stating that divinely revealed truth can and does change and that it is for religion to "update" its teachings in order to be more "modern."</p><p>This is not to say that certain changes were not necessary in so far as disciplines were concerned. Indeed, it is well known there were many problems in the Church and its ability to relate to the contemporary world, which was becoming increasingly hostile towards it. However, this is not a new problem at all, as the Church has always been disliked even at the height of Christendom. This was foretold in Sacred Scripture and will persist until Christ returns. Discipline, or the instruction of the Faith, can and has often times changed. It is <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/is-it-a-doctrine-or-a-discipline">dogma</a>, or divinely revealed truth, that cannot change because it has been revealed from God.</p><p>The essence of the decline is about matters of truth- how we know truth, how we understand it, and what is the authority from which we define our understanding. Modernism is simply an attempt to justify in current times what men have been trying to do since the fall of Adam and Eve, which is to re-define moral truth on their terms and set themselves up as an authority based on their own assertions. This takes many different forms, but as far as the last 500 years of Christian history are concerned, this is over the issue of whether or not doctrine can change or not, and it goes directly to the ideas the built up and manifested during the Protestant Revolution and was brought to America with her founders during the 18th century.</p><p>The idea that divinely revealed truth can change is a heresy, but it is a heresy that has been a characteristic of Protestantism and has been with America since its earliest days. While it is an issue for both Catholics and Protestants, the Catholic issue is actually far easier to deal with because the Church merely has to articulate the positions she already possesses. Any deviations or disagreements with this done persistently and without a genuine attempt to understand is just heresy and can be easily labeled as so and dealt with accordingly. The problem that the Catholic Church in America has is that many of her people and bishops want to "assimilate" their faith into the American philosophy, and since this is impossible because America is based on an anti-Christian, Freemason philosophy, people who persist in attempting to do this find themselves placed into a Hegelian dialectic where they compromise parts of divinely revealed truth and if followed far enough, simply abandon the Faith in the name of "fitting in." The biggest problem for the Catholic Church today is either simple ignorance due to decades of absolutely poor catechesis on one hand, or cowardice or apathy from whose who are aware of what the teachings are out of fear of social ostracism on the other hand.</p><p>The Protestant Churches have a far bigger problem in the USA because there is absolutely no unity among the sects except in their rejection of the Catholic Church. This has been the situation with Protestantism for centuries, and since Protestantism by its very nature has to first define itself in terms of its rejection of THE POPE and the authority of the Church, it has to likewise reject or ignore the history of Christianity itself from Constantine until around the time after the Black Death because it is, like every heresy, a heretical anomaly that left the Church and attempted to start its own cult acting as its own independent authority. Since all of the different sects that left the Church based their heresy on differences with divinely revealed teaching, each heresy will naturally disagree with the Church while at the same time being unable to doctrinally reconcile with each other, and thus creating even more division. For centuries Protestants fought wars against each other and still viciously debate with each other to this day about basic matters of Christian belief that were settled well before the fourth century. In the name of "FOLLOWING THE BIBLE" and "REJECTING THE EVIL POPE," these sects simply dug up old heresies, put new clothes on them, gave them new names and are parading them around as though they are teaching something unique. While they may be "unique" in terms of they have not been seen for centuries, such as the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08537a.htm">infamous Judaizing heresy that is common today among certain Protestants (and is the only Christian heresy explicity mentioned by the Bible too</a>), the fact is that the ideas are nothing new, both their opposition to the Faith as well as their particular heretical ideas.</p><p>Heresy has always been a problem in Christendom, but just like with weeds in a garden, heresy needs to be rooted out when it appears in order to prevent them from taking over and destroying the garden. Heresy becomes a major problem when it remains unchecked because it attacks the philosophical and moral underpinnings of a society, through which the subsequent structural weakening will cause a social collapse or decline if not fixed. It is the reason why notorious, unrepentant, and persistent heretics were put to death, not because it was THE EVIL CHURCH TRYING TO SILENCE BIBLE TRUTH, but because these people were, whether they were intending to or not (and often times they were intending) to cause a social and political revolution using religious discontentment just as the National Socialists today use racial discontentment or the International Socialists use economic discontentment to achieve the same end.</p><p>Heresy is always rooted in the rejection of authority, namely of the Church. But since heretics cannot clearly identify who is the replacement authority, the natural result of heresy is first a "spiritual anarchy" in which different sects fight with each other for power. This can go on for a time, but eventually the fighting will subside, and after which in order to make any kind of peace between their irreconcilable views, they will submit their difference to a mutually agreed upon third party to act as a broker, which for centuries always has been the government. As such, the churches are surrendering their traditional role as the "second estate" in society- the buffer between the people and the government- and make themselves vassals of the government itself, in which obedience to the Churches becomes obedience to the state. This has been a signature problem of Protestantism and all of its previous movements, including the heresies of old, because by rejecting the Church each heresy either lead to fighting with other heresies or attempted to make herself a "national church" based on some form of identitarianism, but with both paths leading to the same end of subjugation to the first estate. In the case of Luther, it was the creation of a "German church" with "a German god for a German people." The English under King Henry VIII did the same, as the English did not per se see themselves as "separating" from Rome, but rather King Henry declaring himself the head of the Church in England.</p><p>It is only natural that if being a "Christian" means obedience to the state, then in time one will naturally reason that there is no reason to actually go to Church because since worship of God is tied to social obedience, then one only needs to be "a good person" as far as the society is concerned and all will be well.</p><p>There is a tremendous amount of criticism today about the "church of nice" and the people who want to "good people" and not go to church. However, it is wrong to say the people who do this are simply malicious, because whether they understand it or not, these people see themselves as "good citizens" based on their following the social commands of the day. They see themselves as no different than Christians, except that Christians have a particular "club" they go to called "church," whereas they want to go to a different "club."</p><p>Likewise, there is another issue that Protestantism causes, which is the private interpretation of moral truth. I do not use the word "Scripture" here because that is automatically implied. What I speak of is the idea that all heretics promulgate, which is that individuals or groups can make moral proclamations outside of the teaching of the Church. This is a consistent theme throughout all of Christian history but is a veritable tenet of Protestantism and again feeds into the reason why they have to ignore most of Christian history and that which they do pay attention to they have to meticulously re-write to fit their own conception of of the past, because they have absolutely no way to justify their beliefs in the same way that no amount of of lipstick on a pig can hide the fact that it is a pig wearing lipstick and not a person.</p><p>Just as with the issue of nationalism, it is only a matter of time that if a sect can say they can define moral truth independently, then others will say they can do the same too. This is the reason behind the explosion of the "evangelical" movement in the USA, because as the mainline Protestant churches began to decline and finally be forced to face the fact that they cannot hide or reconcile their differences, that individuals would appear and attack the institutions, creating their own "churches" to take their place. What happened in Europe simply replicated itself in the USA and with the same vitriol against the Catholic Church, except the evangelical movement is formed around cults of individual personalities. People do not go to the Lutheran, Methodist, Episcopal, or Presbytarian churches so much any more as they go to see "Pastor Bobby Ray" or "Brother Jimmy Earl" at churches with names like "Cinema Church" or "The Gathering." The reality is that these are for the most part Baptist and Pentecostal churches, and to a far lesser extent the Presbytarians that have re-named and re-branded themselves to try and make themselves relevant and attract new members, but as we have noted above are still in terminal decline long-term.</p><p>As mentioned above, the Protestant revolutionaries of old used the corruption of the Catholic Church as the social point of leverage to form their own sects and ultimately pursue power over others. The "evangelicals" do this by a different means, and that is through using the real heresies and divisions of the mainline churches not just to form their own churches "because it is right," but so by making their own cults of personality they can becomes famous, rich, and powerful. It is a well-known fact among these "ministers"- and I do not speak of the obvious examples such as Joel Osteen, Pat Robertson, or Billy Graham- that even a small-time minister in a poor neighborhood with a small and impoverished congregation can earn a six-figure salary. It is the reason why throughout poor areas across America, be they poor whites in the mountains of Appalachia or poor blacks in the urban ghettos, there is a church on nearly every street corner (or road junction if in the country) and a "pastor" who is usually at a disproportionately higher income bracket with respect to his area or congregation that is funded by the tithes from his "church."</p><p>At the same time the structure of these heresies themselves change, the exodus of people will continue out of the churches because, using the same structure of logic, if a "Christian minister" can make himself an independent authority for moral teaching, why can't some random non-Christian man on the street do the same? If as noted before the obedience to the "church" was obedience to the government, and if a man sees himself as a "good person" who conforms to the social tendencies of his day but does not go to Church, why can't he, in his own mind, become his own "church" that he worships at, for as long as he understands that he is not "harming" anybody according to his own defined moral code, he is philosophically at liberty to do so?</p><p style="text-align: center"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/quote-do-what-thou-wilt-shall-be-the-whole-of-the-law-aleister-crowley-44869.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-113868" height="141" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/quote-do-what-thou-wilt-shall-be-the-whole-of-the-law-aleister-crowley-44869-300x141.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/quote-do-what-thou-wilt-shall-be-the-whole-of-the-law-aleister-crowley-44869-300x141.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/quote-do-what-thou-wilt-shall-be-the-whole-of-the-law-aleister-crowley-44869-768x361.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/quote-do-what-thou-wilt-shall-be-the-whole-of-the-law-aleister-crowley-44869.jpg 850w" width="300" /></a></p><p style="text-align: center">Christians get upset when they hear Crowley's words, and rightly so. However, the essence of Protestantism IS what Crowley said, because his teaching was to make oneself the authority for right and wrong. This is the essence of all satanism and evil, and is the sin of the Garden of Eden.</p><p style="text-align: center">The descent into the depths which Crowley reached was slow and took centuries, but the fact is that the path which Crowley taught was the end product of Protestant philosophy. Again, I am not saying the Protestants worship satan, but the reasoning behind Protestant philosophy naturally leads to the decline and disappearance of Christianity to be naturally replaced with the Crowlean mantra of "do what thou wilt" because the anti-authoritarianism of Protestantism is the anti-authoritiarianism of Crowley. It is the same line, just different points on the line.</p><p>Yet man is a religious being, and because he was made for worship, he will always attempt to worship something. The vacuum created by the decline of Christianity will be filled always, and there are two things that will attempt to fill it.</p><p>The first thing is satanism. This can take many different forms, and most of these forms are not the obvious that one would think of. The way it almost always presents itself is in the form of a worship of the self by the deification of the things dear to a person, which are usually his family, his home, and those he loves and that which he knows. This is the essence of all paganism, as it worships a man's family, his homeland, and his race. It is also essential for today because the rise of Nationalism in Europe, as we have demonstrated through our investigations at Shoebat.com, directly connected to the rise of paganism, and major pagans leaders are working with the nationalist movements so much that the movements themselves are actually pagan in their philosophy. Millions of people, including many Christians, are being deceived into supporting pagan ideas under the guise of "protecting their homelands from Muslim invaders" when as we have pointed out the reality is that the governments themselves have invited these people into their nations for the express purpose of causing destabilization in order to present nationalism and paganism as the solution to the problem which they created.</p><p>As we have pointed out, anybody who supports the paganism or nationalism is deceived because those at the top of these movement, just like the Protestants of old or many of the "new preachers" today, are not so much interested in truth or righteousness, but rather about getting power at all costs and making themselves the authority over the Church. It is a struggle for power at all costs with respect to none.</p><p>The second thing that will fill the vacuum in society will be Islam. As many Catholic writers and saints have pointed out, Islam is the final form of all Christian heresy, and all Christian heresies if left unchecked will culminate in Islam because the Arabia out of which Islam emerged was the dumping ground for Christian heretics and so the religion absorbed the practices and beliefs of these men:</p><blockquote><p>Mohammedanism was a <heresy>: that is the essential point to grasp before going any further. It began as a heresy, not as a new religion. It was not a pagan contrast with the Church; it was not an alien enemy. It was a perversion of Christian doctrine. It vitality and endurance soon gave it the appearance of a new religion, but those who were contemporary with its rise saw it for what it was_not a denial, but an adaptation and a misuse, of the Christian thing. It differed from most (not from all) heresies in this, that it did not arise within the bounds of the Christian Church. The chief heresiarch, Mohammed himself, was not, like most heresiarchs, a man of Catholic birth and doctrine to begin with. He sprang from pagans. But that which he taught was in the main Catholic doctrine, oversimplified. It was the great Catholic world_on the frontiers of which he lived, whose influence was all around him and whose territories he had known by travel_which inspired his convictions. He came of, and mixed with, degraded idolaters of the Arabian wilderness, the conquest of which had never seemed worth the Romans' while.</p><p>...</p><p>Cultures spring from religions; ultimately the vital force which maintains any culture is its philosophy, its attitude toward the universe; the decay of a religion involves the decay of the culture corresponding to it_we see that most clearly in the breakdown of Christendom today. The bad work begun at the Reformation is bearing its final fruit in the dissolution of our ancestral doctrines_the very structure of our society is dissolving.</p><p>In the place of the old Christian enthusiasms of Europe there came, for a time, the enthusiasm for nationality, the religion of patriotism. But self-worship is not enough, and the forces which are making for the destruction of our culture, notably the Jewish Communist propaganda from Moscow, have a likelier future before them than our old-fashioned patriotism.</p><p>In Islam there has been no such dissolution of ancestral doctrine or, at any rate, nothing corresponding to the universal break-up of religion in Europe. The whole spiritual strength of Islam is still present in the masses of Syria and Anatolia, of the East Asian mountains, of Arabia, Egypt and North Africa.</p><p>The final fruit of this tenacity, the second period of Islamic power, may be delayed: but I doubt whether it can be permanently postponed. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ewtn.com/library/HOMELIBR/HERESY4.TXT">source</a>)</p></blockquote><p>People wonder why there are men converting to Islam today, or how Islam spread so far across the Christian world, and the answer is found in the fact that much of the area of what is today the "Muslim world" that was once Christian was in fact overrun by heresy at the time of the Islamic conquests. As we have noted before, Islam does not so much "conquer" areas as it fills a vacuum from which Christianity has either retreated or been evicted by the people, who have a basic knowledge of the religion yet reject its teaching and are still searching for some kind of truth, usually because they are looking for a easy means of salvation- they want truth and to be saved, yet they do not want to invest the moral rigor and work on their own. Christianity forces a man to do this, for as St. Paul warns, each man has to work out his salvation and to struggle to do what is right. Islam promises a man salvation but as we and many others have pointed out, for each rule in Islam there is a loophole so much to the point that a Muslim can find an Islamically-compatible excuse for any kind of moral effort or rigor and a Islamically-suitable justification for any immoral behavior. It is a religion that gives license to license and promises a man eternity in this life that will continue to the hereafter with the acceptance of a few simple beliefs and the permission to mistreat others who are not Muslims if they so will.</p><p>This right here is the reason why notorious heretics were put to death. Heresy is not about a mere difference of opinion. It is an outright attack on God Himself and His Church done in the name of power but will always lead to social discord, then spiritual anarchy, then secularism, then Satanism either explicitly by returning to paganism or implicitly by the ascent of Islam.</p><p>The way to fight against heresy, apostasy, and all evils and forms of error is simple. It is to follow the teachings and way of the Church, because when followed it is a guarantee to lead down the road of salvation. This is not to say that it is a simple or easy matter, because one must walk down the via dolorosa that leads to Calvary with Christ, and it is a difficult path. However, to walk this path and persist in it is to gain eternal life.</p><p>The wage of sin is death, and as heresy is the sin of pride and rebellion against God, it is only to be expected that "Christianity" would decline in America, for much of what America calls "Christianity" is just the repackaged heresies of the ancient world. The decline can be reversed, but it will only come from a true conversion and return to the one and true Faith, not by attempting to repair a vehicle that was already broken and is inevitably going to break again.</p><p>On a final note, the article mentioned "White Christians." I intentionally did not discuss this aspect because while race has become a major topic of discussion today and for good reasons, the reality is that the decline of Christianity in America has nothing to do with race at all. Heresy is as just a blind to skin color and national affiliation as is truth, because ultimately the struggle is not between different ethnic groups, but between good and evil.</p>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Christianity Is In Decline Across America, Satanism Is Taking Its Place And Nobody Knows How To Stop The Rise

A new report was released saying that Christians are in serious decline across the USA, especially with the Evangelicals:,White Christians in the US are in the minority and declining, amid increasing ethnic diversity and growing numbers of peopl…

Read More...»

DACA Is Nothing Special, Many Past Presidents Allowed Immigrants To Live In The United States. The People Who Have Been Allowed To Live In America Because Of DACA Should Be Legalized. The Very People Complaining About Immigration Are The Same People Who Believe In Tolerating Homosexuality In Society

<p>DACA is nothing special. Numerous presidents in the past allowed immigrants to live in the US. For the most part, since these people have been living in the US for most of their lives, and since its not their fault that they were brought into America, they should be made naturalized citizens. Another observation that I have made is that the very people complaining about immigration, are the very people who will tolerate homosexuality. These types of people, tolerate homosexuals, as long as their "legal," over illegal immigrants who are not criminals. This is the subject of my latest video:</p><p><iframe src="http://shoebattube.com/player/embed_player.php?vid=1420&width=660&height=440&autoplay=no" width="660" height="440" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war DACA Is Nothing Special, Many Past Presidents Allowed Immigrants To Live In The United States. The People Who Have Been Allowed To Live In America Because Of DACA Should Be Legalized. The Very People Complaining About Immigration Are The Same People Who Believe In Tolerating Homosexuality In Society

DACA is nothing special. Numerous presidents in the past allowed immigrants to live in the US. For the most part, since these people have been living in the US for most of their lives, and since its not their fault that they were brought into Am…

Read More...»

Israeli PM Netanyahu Makes Panicked Visit To Russia And Begs For Help From Putin

<p style="text-align: center"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/444608767.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-113855" height="173" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/444608767-300x173.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/444608767-300x173.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/444608767.jpg 640w" width="300" /></a></p><p>It has come out in Russian media that two weeks ago, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made a surprise visit to Russian President Vladimir Putin while Putin was on vacation.</p><blockquote><p>A very senior Israeli intelligence delegation, a week ago, visited Washington. Then, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu broke into President Putin’s summer holiday to meet him in Sochi, where, according to a senior Israeli government official (as cited in the Jerusalem Post), Netanyahu threatened to bomb the Presidential Palace in Damascus, and to disrupt and nullify the Astana cease-fire process, should Iran continue to “extend its reach in Syria.”</p><p><strong>Russia’s Pravda wrote, “according to eyewitnesses of the open part of the talks, the Israeli prime minister was too emotional and at times even close to panic. He described a picture of the apocalypse to the Russian president that the world may see, if no efforts are taken to contain Iran, which, as Netanyahu believes, is determined to destroy Israel.”</strong></p><p><strong>So, what is going on here? Whether or not Pravda’s quote is fully accurate (though the description was confirmed by senior Israeli commentators), what is absolutely clear (from Israeli sources) is that both in Washington and at Sochi, the Israeli officials were heard out, but got nothing. Israel stands alone. Indeed, it is reported that Netanyahu was seeking “guarantees” about the future Iranian role in Syria, rather than “asking for the moon” of an Iranian exit. But how could Washington or Moscow realistically give Israel such guarantees?</strong></p><p>Belatedly, Israel has understood that it backed the wrong side in Syria – and it has lost. It is not really in a position to demand anything. It will not get an American enforced buffer zone beyond the Golan armistice line, nor will the Iraqi-Syrian border be closed, or somehow “supervised” on Israel’s behalf.</p><p>Of course, the Syrian aspect is important, but to focus only on that, would be to “miss the forest for the trees.” The 2006 war by Israel to destroy Hizbullah (egged on by the U.S., Saudi Arabia – and even a few Lebanese) was a failure. Symbolically, for the first time in the Middle East, a technologically sophisticated, and lavishly armed, Western nation-state simply failed. What made the failure all the more striking (and painful) was that a Western state was not just bested militarily, it had lost also the electronic and human intelligence war, too — both spheres in which the West thought their primacy unassailable.</p><p>The Fallout from Failure<br />Israel’s unexpected failure was deeply feared in the West, and in the Gulf too. A small, armed (revolutionary) movement had stood up to Israel – against overwhelming odds – and prevailed: it had stood its ground. This precedent was widely perceived to be a potential regional “game changer.” The feudal Gulf autocracies sensed in Hizbullah’s achievement the latent danger to their own rule from such armed resistance.</p><p>The reaction was immediate. Hizbullah was quarantined — as best the full sanctioning powers of America could manage. And the war in Syria started to be mooted as the “corrective strategy” to the 2006 failure (as early as 2007) — though it was only with the events following 2011 that the “corrective strategy” came to implemented, à outrance.</p><p>Against Hizbullah, Israel had thrown its full military force (though Israelis always say, now, that they could have done more). And against Syria, the U.S., Europe, the Gulf States (and Israel in the background) have thrown the kitchen sink: jihadists, al-Qaeda, ISIS (yes), weapons, bribes, sanctions and the most overwhelming information war yet witnessed. Yet Syria – with indisputable help from its allies – seems about to prevail: it has stood its ground, against almost unbelievable odds.</p><p>Just to be clear: if 2006 marked a key point of inflection, Syria’s “standing its ground” represents a historic turning of much greater magnitude. It should be understood that Saudi Arabia’s (and Britain’s and America’s) tool of fired-up, radical Sunnism has been routed. And with it, the Gulf States, but particularly Saudi Arabia are damaged. The latter has relied on the force of Wahabbism since the first foundation of the kingdom: but Wahabbism in Lebanon, Syria and Iraq has been roundly defeated and discredited (even for most Sunni Muslims). It may well be defeated in Yemen too. This defeat will change the face of Sunni Islam.</p><p>Already, we see the Gulf Cooperation Council, which originally was founded in 1981 by six Gulf tribal leaders for the sole purpose of preserving their hereditary tribal rule in the Peninsula, now warring with each other, in what is likely to be a protracted and bitter internal fight. The “Arab system,” the prolongation of the old Ottoman structures by the complaisant post-World War I victors, Britain and France, seems to be out of its 2013 “remission” (bolstered by the coup in Egypt), and to have resumed its long-term decline.</p><p>Netayahu’s “near panic” (if that is indeed what occurred) may well be a reflection of this seismic shift taking place in the region. Israel has long backed the losing side – and now finds itself “alone” and fearing for its near proxies (the Jordanians and the Kurds). The “new” corrective strategy from Tel Aviv, it appears, is to focus on winning Iraq away from Iran, and embedding it into the Israel-U.S.-Saudi alliance.</p><p>If so, Israel and Saudi Arabia are probably too late into the game, and are likely underestimating the visceral hatred engendered among so many Iraqis of all segments of society for the murderous actions of ISIS. Not many believe the improbable (Western) narrative that ISIS suddenly emerged armed, and fully financed, as a result of former Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s alleged “sectarianism”: No, as rule-of-thumb, behind each such well-breached movement – stands a state.</p><p>Daniel Levy has written a compelling piece to argue that Israelis generally would not subscribe to what I have written above, but rather: “Netanyahu’s lengthy term in office, multiple electoral successes, and ability to hold together a governing coalition … [is based on] him having a message that resonates with a broader public. It is a sales pitch that Netanyahu … [has] ‘brought the state of Israel to the best situation in its history, a rising global force … the state of Israel is diplomatically flourishing.’ Netanyahu had beaten back what he had called the ‘fake-news claim’ that without a deal with the Palestinians ‘Israel will be isolated, weakened and abandoned’ facing a ‘diplomatic tsunami.’</p><p>“Difficult though it is for his political detractors to acknowledge, Netanyahu’s claim resonates with the public because it reflects something that is real, and that has shifted the center of gravity of Israeli politics further and further to the right. It is a claim that, if correct and replicable over time, will leave a legacy that lasts well beyond Netanyahu’s premiership and any indictment he might face.</p><p>“Netanyahu’s assertion is that he is not merely buying time in Israel’s conflict with the Palestinians to improve the terms of an eventual and inevitable compromise. Netanyahu is laying claim to something different — the possibility of ultimate victory, the permanent and definitive defeat of the Palestinians, their national and collective goals.</p><p>“In over a decade as prime minister, Netanyahu has consistently and unequivocally rejected any plans or practical steps that even begin to address Palestinian aspirations. Netanyahu is all about perpetuating and exacerbating the conflict, not about managing it, let alone resolving it…[The] message is clear: there will be no Palestinian state because the West Bank and East Jerusalem are simply Greater Israel.”</p><p>...</p><p>The key point now is that the region has just made a seismic shift into the “not to be” camp. Is there much that America can do about that? Israel very much is alone with only a weakened Saudi Arabia at its side, and there are clear limits to what Saudi Arabia can do.</p><p>The U.S. calling on Arab states to engage more with Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi seems somehow inadequate. Iran is not looking for war with Israel (as a number of Israeli analysts have acknowledged); but, too, the Syrian President has made clear that his government intends to recover “all Syria” – and all Syria includes the occupied Golan Heights. And this week, Hassan Nasrallah called on the Lebanese government “to devise a plan and take a sovereign decision to liberate the Shebaa Farms and the Kfarshouba Hills” from Israel.</p><p>A number Israeli commentators already are saying that the “writing is on the wall” – and that it would be better for Israel to cede territory unilaterally, rather than risk the loss of hundreds of lives of Israeli servicemen in a futile attempt to retain it. That, though, seems hardly congruent with the Israeli Prime Minister’s “not an inch, will we yield” character and recent statements. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-09-06/it-time-benjamin-netanyahu-panic">source</a>)</p></blockquote><p>This assessment of the situation is directly related to what we have been talking about at Shoebat.com for a long time, which is the collapse of Saudi Arabia and the rise of a new Ottoman Turkey.</p><p>Last century, Turkey was called the "sick man of Europe," describing how the Ottoman Empire was in a veritable "dead man walking" whose death was inevitable at the next major crisis. which came in the form of World War I. Saudi Arabia is today the "sick man of the Middle East," and likewise is at this point attempting to hold out collapse as long as possible due to rebellion from its own people and the hatred its neighbors have for her. Unlike the Ottoman Empire, Saudi Arabia does not have its own army in any practical sense. Her army has been for the last century the Americans, and this is because Saudi Arabia sells cheap oil to the USA while the USA sells cheap food to the Saudis. The Americans get to live and grow beyond average means, and the Saudis get to feed their people to keep them complaisent.</p><p>However, as we have been documenting, Saudi Arabia today is much like France of the 17th century. The ruling class does not care about its people at all, and their extravagant and open flouting of all the tenets of Islam fuels the rage of the commoners, many of whom are very poor and forced to abide by strict tenets of Islamic law or face severe punishments. Saudi Arabia's historical enemy going back to pre-Islamic times, Iran, is growing in power and has cultivated deep economic and friendly political ties with all of Saudi Arabia's neighbors in Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE, Syria, Jordan, and even her other historical nemesis, Turkey. While not a major world power, Iran is a regional power who if not liked, at least has the respect of many of her neighbors and beneficial economic ties with them. The cooperation between Iran and Turkey in light of the situation with Saudi Arabia and the calls for a resurrection of Ottoman civilization as expressed by Erdogan is the sign of an Islamic uprising that historically takes place every few centuries throughout the Muslim world and at this point is overdue for another one. As long as Turkey shows respect to the Shiites, which they have shown they will so far, the Aryo-Ottoman union poses a grave threat to Saudi Arabia.</p><p>The situation of the USA in this conflict, while appearing to be negative, is actually not as bad as one would think. It is well known that America is the proverbial "crack whore" who walks the alleys of the Middle East- she will go with anybody so long as she can get her fix of cheap oil. Turkey and Iran surely know this, and in spite of America's militaristic talk towards Iran, they are not going to attack Iran so long as the Iranians are being backed by Russia and now are allied with another current (albeit tenuous) American ally in Turkey and most importantly, through Turkey's close historical ally in Germany. This likewise explains the situation with ISIS in Syria and how both the USA and Turkey were supporting ISIS- ultimately, America is going to ally with whoever guarantees her access to oil at a good price, and she does not care who dies or what is destroyed in the process.</p><p>Israel is a historical US ally, and as has been pointed out has been very influential in the formation of US policy in the Middle East. They are also allied to Saudi Arabia, and as many have pointed out, the Israelis openly admit they helped to fund ISIS and all of the horrors they committed in Iraq and Syria for the same policy goals as part of the same geopolitical conflict with the Russian and other regional powers.</p><p>The problem that Israel now has is that the conflict in Syria is basically at an end. The US backed forces of ISIS are essentially defeated because the goal of destabilizing the Middle East to cause the manufactured "refugee crisis" to lead to the rise of nationalism has been accomplished. Turkey has emerged stronger than ever and closer to her German ally, which as we have documented both are using the manufactured "crisis" to bolster their own political and social positions. Russia has come out as Syria's ally and is now viewed as a stronger power in the region, and while they are enemies of Turkey they are not going to interfere in Iran's affairs because they do not want or need a conflict with Iran and Turkey at the same time. The USA, while having spent a considerable amount of money, simply will just reallocate its resources in the region, restructure its alliances, and continue about as it has before.</p><p>The real losers here are Saudi Arabia and Israel. Saudi Arabia is in decline and simply at a point of trying to hold off death, while Israel is now more isolated than ever. Unlike the Americans, there is no place for Israel to retreat to. If anything, as the article has mentioned, by he alliances and support of what were immoral and illegal conflicts in the region that have failed to garner the desired results, Israel is now forced into a position of weakness and is trying to seek out a strong power that it can ally with. Iran and Syria are out of the question, due to the Israeli government's push for war against them, and as the article notes, the Syrians and Iranians are going to extract as many concessions as are legally possible from the Israelis. Any alliance with the Turks will be dangerous because it could reduce Israel to being an Ottoman vassal. Egypt is weak and not an option.</p><p>The only other major ally is the Russians, which while Israel has a long relationship with them due to many Jews having come from Russia to Israel, still Israel's support of US policies and attacks against Russian interests as a part of the geopolitical struggle put the nation into another position of weakness. Netanyahu is not stupid, and he has every reason to be very concerned because not only is Israel surrounded by her neighbors who have never liked her, but through her alliances and decisions she has agitated them to anger and isolated herself from her allies or her allies have abandoned her.</p><p>As we have been pointing out, there is a third world war in the making right now based on the alliances of World War II and those which have existed for centuries. The idea of a pan-Eurasianism, based on a Turco-Teutonic alliance between the Aryan nations of Germany and Iran with the Turkic nations of Turkey and Japan, is once again becoming popular as shown through the rise of ethnonationalism and the manufactured "crises" in the West and abroad with the purpose of manipulating popular opinion to support militarization and economic expansionism. The alliances erected after the Second World War to keep "stability" in the world are dissolving, and the conflict that barring a miracle will happen are in reality long-standing wounds just reopened and reinfected once again.</p><p>While Israel is an 8-million strong nation with an advanced technological base and nuclear weapons, and a history of fighting and winning against her neighbors, Turkey is 80 million strong with the largest army in the region that is already powerful and only becoming more powerful, and they are currently in possession of and producing nuclear weapons who has become uncomfortably close to her neighbors. Likewise, as the article notes, Israel is viewed in many ways as an "imperialist" nation by her neighbors, and Israel is also viewed as being very "decadent" and immoral such as with her support of the largest LGBT parade in the Middle East and in the world.</p><p style="text-align: center"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/original.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-113854" height="200" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/original-300x200.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/original-300x200.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/original.jpg 630w" width="300" /></a></p><p style="text-align: center">This is Israel <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.thejournal.ie/gays-israel-palestine-2805116-Jun2016/">today</a>. It is very pro-LGBT, and in addition to the fact that the LGBT is a sin worthy of death and that cries out to heaven for vengeance (as the Bible itself notes as one of four of such sins), this will be used as fuel by her Muslim neighbors to drive policy decisions against her.</p><p>For exactly four hundred years, from 1517 to 1917, the Ottomans conquered and ruled Jerusalem and the territory of what is today Israel. The British, while often talked about in terms of modern history, only had Jerusalem for a mere 30 years. Israel as a nation is just about to turn 70. The time that Israel has existed as a nation and in combination with its control under the British is scarcely 20% of the history of that region for the past five centuries.</p><p>As we have mentioned many times, people have very long memories. As Turkey is attempting to revive its old empire, make no mistake that they see those lands as part of their former territory and are already thinking about taking it back under their rule. Iran is of no threat to them, since the holy sites of Shiite Islam are primarily in Iraq and Iran. Iran would have no problem with Turkey seeking to become, as it was for centuries, the "custodian" of Islamic sacred sites in Israel (such as the Al-Aqsa mosque) and certainly as well as the cities of Medina and Mecca in Saudi Arabia. And America will still be in the region, doing what is always does, looking for its next hit of cheap crude oil.</p><p>Given Russia's long history of conflict with Turkey, it would only make sense for Israel to seek out an ally with the Russians, in order to keep Turkey at bay.</p><p>This entire situation is not about Palestinian territories, Hizballah, or even Iran in any long-term sense. <strong>This is about the resurrection of the Ottoman Empire</strong>.</p><p>Pay attention to the news, because the next few years are going to be very interesting, especially for Israel and Saudi Arabia.</p><p> </p>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Israeli PM Netanyahu Makes Panicked Visit To Russia And Begs For Help From Putin

It has come out in Russian media that two weeks ago, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made a surprise visit to Russian President Vladimir Putin while Putin was on vacation.A very senior Israeli intelligence delegation, a week ago, visit…

Read More...»