By Walid Shoebat
Everyone was worried about North Korea's nuclear missiles hitting the United States when this whole time there is more concern that North Korea are giving these missiles to Iran to nuke Saudi Arabia and now Iran just made a direct threat that they will obliterate Saudi Arabia. Here watch and listen:
Iran is likely to gain nuclear missiles from North Korea or even others.
We have been declaring it for decades that Arabia, not Rome, not New York is what will be bombed to oblivion. North Korea will not bomb New York. Relax people.
"Iran will hit back at most of Saudi Arabia with the exception of Islam's holiest places if the kingdom does anything 'ignorant,'" Tehran's defense minister was quoted as saying Sunday after a Saudi prince threatened to move the "battle" to Iran.
"If the Saudis do anything ignorant, we will leave no area untouched except Mecca and Medina," Iranian Defense Minister Hossein Dehghan was quoted by the semi-official Tasnimnews agency as saying.
"They think they can do something because they have an air force," he added.
Dehghan is correct.
While Iranian forces are no match technologically for Riyadh’s lavishly equipped military, Iran’s air force is mostly comprised of obsolete airframes, Tehran can use what equipment and troops it does have in clever ways to offset that advantage.
Iran has a host of missiles at its disposal including the liquid-fueled Emad, which has a 1,000-mile range. It also has the Shahab family of ballistic missiles. The latest variant, the developmental Shabab-4, could have a range as great as 2,400 miles.
But the most capable Iranian missiles are the solid-fuel, two-stage road-mobile Sejjil series ballistic missiles—which are very difficult to hunt down. They also have very quick reaction times.
“The Sejjil 3 would reportedly have three stages, a maximum range of 4,000 km, and a launch weight of 38,000 kg,” according to the Claremont & George C. Marshall Institute’s Missile Threat project.
But the claim that Iran does not intend to hit the holy cities of Mecca and Medina is simply political ploy as not to upset the Muslim world until it declares Karbalah as the holiest place.
Just take last year as an example, the Iranian backed Houthis confirmed a launch of a Burkan-1 ballistic missile into Saudi Arabia that targeted King Abdulaziz International Airport in Jeddah, the kingdom’s busiest airport. However, the coalition forces revealed it was heading towards Mecca as Reuters also confirmed:
Yemen's Houthis launch missile toward Saudi holy city https://t.co/C8mcOmUyKL
- Reuters Top News (@Reuters) October 28, 2016
The US has sold more than 19,000 smart bombs to Saudi Arabia. What is missing for Saudi Arabia is the GBU-28 or the GBU-43 MOAB, which can penetrate underground fortifications (60 feet of concrete).
So Saudi Arabia is unlikely to deal with Iran’s missiles or nuclear facility.
Take the Iranian Fordo facility for example. It would be a difficult endeavor and Arabia must ensure that the bombs would be able to drill through both the side of the mountain and the facility’s hardened shell before detonating, the task might still be completed, but not without possibilities of failure. The problem is that while the BLU-109 are powerful weapons, it’s not certain that they are actually powerful enough to blast through the thick layers of earth and concrete surrounding Natanz and (especially) Fordo. A strike with these weapons might destroy the facilities; but then again, it might not. The BLU-109, for instance, is rated to penetrate around six feet of concrete — but Natanz facility (30-plus feet of earth) it might need several hits to complete a drill process. A 2006 study of the problem by researchers at MIT’s Security Studies Program argued for example, that taking out Natanz with BLU-113s is possible, but only in a large-scale strike involving 80+ warheads to drill into the facilities. It is no wonder why Saudi Arabia purchased 1,500 of these drill puppies.
The only problem is that if Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States decide to take on such a mission is that failure would create a Pearl Harbor effect in which Iran could retaliate and nuke Saudi Arabia when it gains its nukes.
But when it comes to Mecca's destruction, realization is finally sinking in as countless articles from Egypt to Saudi Arabia are publishing headlines saying that Iran is gradually diverting their pilgrims from visiting Mecca and encouraging them to visit Karbala in Iraq instead.
One headline sums it up: “The Alternative To Hajj: Muslims To Arafat And Iranians To Karbala. Does Iran Seek A Sectarian Divide To Replace Mecca?”
Iranians even opted to visit Arafa in Karbala, Iraq, instead of Arafa in Mecca, Saudi Arabia. Iran’s religious authority has even completely boycotted the Hajj last year.
Saudi Arabian paper Ukaz notices the shift:
“The Hajj is successfully completed when the pilgrims get to Mina to throw the stones [at the devil] … pilgrims flocked from all over the world except from Iran which preferred to do the Hajj this year in Karbala, Iraq”.
Shoebat.com has been speaking of the coming shift for years now and realization is at hand.
Why the shift? Because the Bible says so. The harlot desert is finally abandoned and is burned by her own lovers.
The noose is tightening on Al-Sa’ud when it rummaged to salvage its Sunni Alliance to save itself especially after Turkey and Pakistan abandoned the coalition. To Shia, Karbala supersedes Mecca. In the Shiite faith, there was a feud between the two cities. When Mecca felt haughty and arrogant that Allah warns her, he will toss the Ka’ba in hellfire and will utterly destroy her (1).
But where did the Shia extract such an idea of destroying Arabia?
The answer is simple: the devil knows biblical prophecies much better than the average joe in Sunday school who attempts to put the prophetic puzzle together to conclude that Rome is what was intended for destruction.
If in doubt about Iran destroying Arabia in the Bible, just look up "Elam" (Iran) in Isaiah 21 (we made it simple for you, just click here and try to refute) and even Isaiah 14:23 promised that Arabia will get "the broom of destruction" (nuclear) where "the Arab will no longer pitch his tent there" (Isaiah 13:20). We were the only ones correct that Israel will not hit Iran's nuclear facilities and that Iran will gain a nuclear missiles so expect it shortly.
Keep in mind that if Rome is what Apocalypse had in mind, scripture clearly declared that the ones who destroy it are also considered God’s enemies in the Bible. It is not because God loves the Kaaba, but because He promised that the harlot is destroyed by her own children:
For God hath given into their hearts to do that which pleaseth him: that they give their kingdom to the beast, till the words of God be fulfilled. (Revelation 17:17)
Can anyone explain this by attributing the verses to Rome? Impossible. God says that He will make it happen to even induce the beast to destroy his own city (the harlot city).
For centuries anti-Rome interpreters insisted that they too hated the harlot (in their case it was Rome) and will rejoice at her destruction. This will make the very anti-Rome interpreters as pro-beast since the beast also wants the destruction of the harlot city. So by this these become of the seed of satan. Catholics never showed an interest in destroying either Rome or Mecca.
How could these be setting themselves up for a surprise? While the true seed (true Christians) stems from Christ (Isaiah 53) “he [Messiah] will see his seed [offspring] and prolong his days” (Isaiah 53:10) but in addition, such seed must also stem from the seed of the woman "And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.” (Revelation 12:14,17)
These kept the "commandments of God" and not just had 'faith alone' void of obedience in following the commandments and the sacraments established by Christ. Christ made that clear "if you love Me you must obey My commandments". (John 14:15)
Faith in scripture is not just the mental exercise, but is a physical process as well "Do you see that by works a man is justified; and not by faith only?" (James 2:24) This verse, Mary, the Eucharist would instantly unsettle many who claim to have the Holy Spirit. But so do these issues unsettle the demons who have the unholy spirit. There is no unholy who do not perceive themselves as housing the holy.
Yet for centuries, volumes and volumes of writ on Rome, all of them avoiding not just Isaiah 21 and a multitude of other verses, but that these declare themselves as enemies of the woman. You cannot appease the King while you tick off the Queen and expect to get away with it.
Calling Mary the Queen Mother will instantly gain me the reaction "Mary was nothing more than a vessel."
These think of Mary exactly as a Muslim Jihadi martyr would think of his mother. Allah ordained she simply be the vessel to produce martyrs. Was Mary's purpose to only produce a sacrificial martyr?
But how is this type of thinking even possible in the West? It would be more logical to have this type of thinking in the Muslim Middle East. I have never seen something more offensive than to tell a mother that all she is, is just a vessel.
In fact, this is what the Quran teaches about women: "Nisaukum hirthon lakum" (2:223) which means "your women are your plow field" they simply are "the vessel" that carries the fetus that belongs to the father. They even insist that Joseph plowed Mary. This too is Muslim thinking regarding women:
"Your women are your fields, so go into your fields whichever way you like ." (Quran 2:223)
Not even the Muslims make such an issue like this about Mary.
They can't see that throughout history we had millions of women who remained virgin (nuns). But Mary Whom Joseph betrothed her to protect her life? Allah forbid. To these Mary had to have been plowed by Joseph which such an idea only emerged in the 19th century forward.
This mentality is one of the reasons I left Islam and I finally removed my American mother from my Muslim father. I could not take it watching that type of mentality and abuse towards women. Horrible.
Lord have mercy.
In the meanwhile, Daniel's prophecy is recurring; Belshazzar, which means Bel Save the King, holds a last great feast at which he sees a hand writing on a wall with the Aramaic words mene, mene, tekel, upharsin, which Daniel interprets as a judgment from God foretelling the fall of Babylon by the hand of Persia (Iran). Belshazzar as vice-regent in Babylon during the absence of Nabonidus lost Babylon. Nabonidus left the capital for the desert oasis of Tayma in Arabia early in his reign. In the meantime, his son Belshazzar ruled from Babylon. Nabonidus' would visit Arabia for his personal preference for Sîn (Allah) is clear. He had elevated Arabia's deity over the other idols which upset Persia. Today, Persia is elevating its Karbala over the Black Stone and the warning call has been set again; Cyrus is coming for the second Babylon, Arabia while Bel will fail in saving the king and ends up bowing to Christ "Bel [the crescent god] is broken, Nebo [Nabonidus] is destroyed: their idols are put upon beasts and cattle, your burdens of heavy weight even unto weariness" (Isaiah 46:1). This idol was the crescent moon which King Messiah destroys "And Gideon arose and killed Zebah and Zalmunna, and he took the crescent ornaments that were on the necks of their camels" that this time He stomps through the woman Mary (Apocalypse 11-12).
Post a Comment