ANONYMOUS - OUR VOICE

The Fangs Of The Priests: The Destruction Of Rome And Why Catholic Parishioners Are To Blame For The Pedophile Crisis In The Church

<div class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://shoebat.com/2021/08/18/the-fangs-of-the-priests-the-destruction-of-rome-and-why-catholic-parishioners-are-to-blame-for-the-pedophile-crisis-in-the-church/il-sacco-di-roma_1527/" rel="attachment wp-att-144307"><img alt="" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-144307" class="size-full wp-image-144307" height="405" loading="lazy" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" src="https://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/il-sacco-di-roma_1527.jpg" srcset="https://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/il-sacco-di-roma_1527.jpg 640w, https://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/il-sacco-di-roma_1527-300x190.jpg 300w" width="640" /></a>
The Sack of Rome in 1527
</div>
By The Shoebats
If Christ called the Temple a den of thieves, then the Church of Rome has become a den of predators. Sodom has overcome the Church, and the warning that Saint Paul wrote in the first two chapters in his epistle to the Church of Rome is being rejected by the ecclesiastical leadership, with the Pope himself emphasizing the need for “a civil union law” for citizens of Sodom. In his letter to the Church of Rome, St. Paul warned them of “storing up wrath for yourself on the day of wrath when God’s righteous judgment will be revealed.” (Romans 2:5) Before the destruction of Jerusalem by Rome, Josephus tells us that Judeans within the city “indulged themselves in feminine wantonness …  they decked their hair, and put on women’s garments” (Wars, 4.9.10), and today Rome has rejected the warning of St. Paul. If Jerusalem was destroyed for its rejection of Christ and acceptance of Sodom, what then awaits Rome? This is an essay touching on the subject of how the Church has been possessed by the spirit of Sodom and how Rome could be destroyed in the future.
Wherever there is a bad priest, there are his fangs. His fangs are his parishioners, ready to violently plunge deeply into the heart of anyone who opposes the corrupt man of the collar, like a sharp blade tearing through the flesh of dissidents towards tyranny. The fangs of the priest shriek at the sight of those who expose him; even if he molested children, or preyed upon youths, even if he was the most horrid predator, calculatively scheming to devastate his intended victim, there are the fangs ever waiting to strike the one who seeks to reveal the sinister clergyman. Woe to those priests who use their lapels to masquerade their true sinister intentions; woe to them who use their black coats to cover up their malicious designs, when the truth is that they are more like black crows, desirous to steal the harvest. They are like vultures, hovering around a cadaver that is already decaying, but even as the body rots, there are the fangs to defend not only the rottenness, but the predator who feeds off of its flesh. Woe to the one who woes, for he makes himself a target of the priest’s fangs. “He’s our monsignor” were the words uttered by the mouth of an usher towards me when I was in his parish to confront its priest, Fr. Michael Yarbrough, because he was a predator who sexually assaulted a vulnerable young man named Hector Escalante.
The usher, (alongside a gang of other ushers) wanted me to leave the parish even after I warned them of Yarbrough’s predator actions. They didn’t care, they were utterly indifferent, and even after I told this one particular usher that it is a fact that the priest sexually assaulted a young man, his only argument was that “He’s our monsignor,” as if the predator’s position exempted him from justice, freed him from the watchful eye, as if his lapel shielded him from retribution, as if his title covered his ugliness. He was a monster, but he was embellished by a system that uses law to advance the lawless. The predator does not believe in law, he despises it, but yet he will find loopholes within the law to escape the clutches of what he truly deserves. Innumerable times we have seen this within the Catholic Church. Prelates and clergymen know that a priest is a predator, and when it is revealed to the public eye, the Church authorities will say that they knew of his evil actions and simply removed him of his “faculties” (meaning that he cannot give the Sacraments), as if this is any sort of punishment. This is no justice, but a retirement plan for a pederastic criminal, for the predator is kept in the repose of the ecclesiastical abode still receiving the protection of the Temple of Rome. Many Catholics believe that their priest could never be a predator and would never cover up for one.
There is <a href="http://dig.abclocal.go.com/wls/documents/munoz%20proffer.pdf">an example</a> of this way of thinking that occurred within recent years. In 2015, a priest named Kevin Hays was suppose to be the new rector for the now defunct Casa Jesus Seminary in Chicago. Hays arrived at an apartment reserved for priests to be shown his new living quarters by an employee for the Archdiocese. They knocked on the door, but nobody answered. The employee turned the knob, but it was locked. He used his master key to open the door, and when they entered they saw that the apartment’s last resident, Fr. Octavio Munoz, had left his laptop which was still on. On its screen was playing a disturbing video of a young boy. Hays and the employee left. The priest did not say anything to anyone, he did not report it, but stayed in the impunity of silence. The employee did not say anything because he — in his own credulity — truly believed that the priest, Hays, was going to report what they saw. Once he realized that the clergyman made no such report, he contacted the Archdiocesan Case Manager at the Office for the Protection of Children and Youth at the Archdiocese of Chicago which then hired private investigators who — after finding emails belonging to Munoz about sexual acts with children — reported the priest to authorities.
It was the employee, and not the priest, Fr. Kevin Hays, who reported Munoz, and he did so only after realizing that the priest who he trusted was doing nothing. This is only one example of how priests cover for other priests who are involved in crimes and laypeople put too much trust in their clergymen. When a priest is penalized for “misconduct”, there will be Catholics who, in a knee-jerk reaction, will portray it as some sort of conspiracy against tradition. For example, when Fr. Christopher Phillips was moved from San Antonio to the Houston diocese for “misconduct” in 2017, I suspected (due to me already encountering predators within the Church) that something predatorily had been done. But, there were already people quick to make the accusation that Phillips was being persecuted for his upholding of the tradition of the Anglican mass within the Catholic Church. Charles Wilson, a parishioner at Philipps’s church — Our Lady of Atonement — and the chairman of the St. Joseph Foundation, <a href="https://www.apple.com/">called</a> the decision to remove Phillips “illegal and abusive.” Wilson went on to affirm that if the removal of Phillips succeeds “you can expect that Our Lady of the Atonement will become a territorial parish with perhaps one Anglican Use liturgy per week. All that we have sacrificed for will be lost.” Wilson continued on to say: “The threat faced by our parish is extremely grave”. 
One inside source from Our Lady of Atonement stated that many parishioners “are saying this is a land grab. … The archbishop will keep the property and those who want to join the ordinariate can just move on.” So, after a priest is removed the first impression of parishioners is not that we should await for the verdict, or that something evil could have been done by the priest. Rather, they called it “abusive,” “illegal,” “a land grab,” and “extremely grave.” It was eventually <a href="https://virtueonline.org/san-antonio-tx-founding-priest-inhibited-ordinariate">revealed</a> within the same year of 2017 that a deacon who was very close to Phillips and quite popular amongst congregants, named James Orr, was a pedophile who committed child molestation in 1993. In December of 2019, Bishop Steven Lopes sent a letter to Our Lady of the Atonement stating that Phillips knew about and covered up Deacon Orr’s crimes: “the Archdiocese provided me with documentation of still other instances wherein Father Phillips neither informed nor reported to the Archdiocese credible complaints concerning Deacon Orr’s conduct.”
The Archdiocese made another report in January of 2019 stating that when Phillips heard about Orr’s molestation of a child, that he “did not inform the archbishop of the allegation, either at the time it was made or later when recommending Orr for ordination to the permanent diaconate.” Orr’s victim was a child who was attending Our Lady of Atonement’s school, Atonement Academy. As Bishop Lopes wrote: “In addition to the Archdiocesan Report, I have now received a first-hand account of misconduct by James Orr against a former student and graduate of Atonement Academy. Father Phillips received the report at that time, but did nothing.” And even after the parents of the victim asked Phillips to make action against Orr, Phillips was so cold blooded that he callously ignored their pleas. As Bishop Lopes reported: The parents asked him to take the proper steps in accord with the Archdiocesan Safe Environment protocols …These steps were not taken, and no report of the incident was ever made to the Archdiocese or civil authorities.”
Now, the archdiocese should have made this known to the congregants from the beginning instead of just stating that Phillips was being removed for “misconduct.” But still, it is worthy to point out that in the midst of a sex abuse crisis within the Church, the first impression that parishioners have about a priest being removed is that he is some sort of martyr being persecuted for upholding tradition. Bishops usually do not act against a priest because of tradition, but rather bad publicity. 
The presence of predators within the Catholic Church is so horrendous that the Australian government wants for priests to work with law enforcement if a fellow priest reveals to them in the confessional that they partook in molestation, or if a child in the confessional tells the priest that he or she has been molested by another priest. Church officials have protested against this, but the Church has no one to really blame for this but themselves, because of the network of ecclesiastical bureaucrats who shift these molesters to different locations and cover up for them. Archbishop Anthony Fisher of Sydney went so far as to tell the Australian commission in charge of this matter that “if a child penitent confessed their sexual abuse by an adult to him that, ‘I believe I’m bound by the seal of confession not to repeat it’.” But what sin has the child committed to even call this a “confession”? In other words, the abused child is considered to have committed a sin which needs to be “sealed”. So the argument goes that even if a child tells a priest in Confession that he or she has been molested by another priest, the one who hears the confession should not take any action against the abuser lest he break the Seal of Confession. Here lies the spirit of the Pharisee who, while worshipping the letter of the law, rejects the spirit of the law, which is  justice and mercy and faith. (Matthew 23:23) We may look to the Sacraments all we want, but if we have not mercy nor justice, it is for nothing. As we read in Micah:
<blockquote readability="35">
“With what shall I come before the Lord,
    and bow myself before God on high?
Shall I come before him with burnt offerings,
    with calves a year old?
Will the Lord be pleased with thousands of rams,
    with ten thousands of rivers of oil?
Shall I give my firstborn for my transgression,
    the fruit of my body for the sin of my soul?”
He has told you, O man, what is good;
    and what does the Lord require of you
but to do justice, and to love kindness,
    and to walk humbly with your God?” (Micah 6:6-8)
</blockquote>
And when parishioners holler about the “Seal of Confession” being attacked by the Australian government, they too are to blame on account of their sycophancy towards the priests, looking up to him with a dangerous docility even if the one they revere is a predator, not having discernment, and even rejecting discernment itself.
<h2>The Destruction of Jerusalem and Rome</h2>
When I was in the parish of the predator, Michael Yarbrough, all of the faces around me were ones of disdain, and the voices of the ushers were all against me even after I told them of their priest’s malicious actions. “He’s our monsignor” said one of the ushers to me. In this moment, the spirit of the Pharisee was manifest, worshipping the letter of the law, revering their priests who make their phylacteries broad and their fringes long (Matthew 23:5), protecting them even in the face of the dark truth. And what became of the Pharisaical order? It was destroyed by Rome after the destruction of the Temple. Many of the priests of Israel were massacred by the Caesar after the sacking of Jerusalem. Caesar’s reasoning was that since the Temple had been destroyed, its priests shall as well be destroyed with it. As Josephus recounted:
<blockquote readability="14">
“On the fifth day afterward the priests that were pined with the famine came down; and when they were brought to Titus by the guards, they begged for their lives. But he replied, that “The time of pardon was over, as to them: and that this very holy house, on whose account only they could justly hope to be preserved, was destroyed: and that it was agreeable to their office that priests should perish with the house it self to which they belonged.” So he ordered them to be put to death.” (Wars, 6.6.2)
</blockquote>
Since the Temple was gone, the priesthood thus had no purpose; for there cannot be a priesthood without a Temple. If the Temple was not significant, then why did the Jews leave Babylon and request from Cyrus the Great permission to rebuild the Temple? Why did the Maccabees fight to the death for the defense and purification of the Temple? And why did the Jews not only fight for the Temple, but were also ever willing to commit suicide for this very edifice, if it was significant and essential to the Jewish priesthood? As Josephus recorded:
<blockquote readability="21">
“As for the priests, some of them plucked up from the holy house the spikes that were upon it; with their bases, which were made of lead; and shot them at the Romans, instead of darts. But then, as they gained nothing by so doing; and as the fire burst out upon them; they retired to the wall, that was eight cubits broad; and there they tarried. Yet did two of these of eminence among them, who might have saved themselves by going over to the Romans, or have borne up with courage, and taken their fortune with the others, throw themselves into the fire, and were burnt, together with the holy house. Their names were Meirus, the son of Belgas; and Joseph the son of Daleus.” (Wars, 6.6.1)
</blockquote>
Why so much enthusiasm for the Temple if it was not necessary for Judaism? The Jewish priesthood, thus, alongside the Temple, were destroyed, and its torch was passed to the one who destroyed it: Rome. Christendom, being the continuation of the true religion, became the new Israel. But since Christendom has reduced itself to the level of the Pharisee, should we not then expect that what awaits its fate is that which met Jerusalem? Catholic Rome was once horrendously devastated by German mercenaries. We have all heard about the several sackings of Rome by the Goths, and we have heard about the German Nazi occupation of the Vatican. But out of all of the sackings and occupations of Rome, the most destructive one is the one that is least discussed. I am speaking of the sack of Rome by German mercenaries in 1527. And it is this sacking that we will detail here so as to make the parallel with the destruction of Jerusalem and how what took place in 1527 could give us an idea of what could occur in the future.
A catalyst to this destruction of Rome began in 1524, when Pope Clement VII, fearing the expanding empire of Charles V, made an alliance with the emperor’s rivals, Venice and Milan. This alliance was kept a secret until 1525 when it was revealed. Charles was furious and stated that he was determined to execute revenge on “that poltroon of a pope” and added: “Some day perhaps Martin Luther will become a man of substance.” In 1526, the plan to attack Rome ensued. A strong ally to Charles in southern Germany, Georg von Frundsberg, was so adamant to seeing the Pope devastated that he hired mercenaries with his own money, even pawning towns he owned, his castle and his wife’s jewelry. Georg eventually raised an army of 10,000 elite warriors, called the Landsknechte (“Servant of the Land”), many of whom were hard Lutherans eager to see Rome — which they deemed as the Harlot of Babylon — burn to the ground.
They read Luther’s Theses, and they saw themselves as fulfilling some sort of divine destiny, as if they were the scourge of God destroying His enemy, the Vatican. The vicious disposition towards Rome did not just come out of nowhere, but was a response to an immense corruption in Church authority. For example, in 1517 Pope Leo X sent a monk named Johann Tetzel to do a tour through Germany to sell indulgences. He marketed indulgences by saying: “The moment a coin in the coffer rings, a soul from purgatory springs”. The Church also was in the business of selling papal positions, with the purchaser being reimbursed with an annual income. Even low positions within the Vatican, such as in the papal police, were sold to small investors. Those who purchased papal positions were even entitled to sell or give them away to relatives. Such corruption reached the eye of Luther who exploited this and hollered his outcry against the Church. An entire revolution — the Reformation — was sparked and the Church’s corruption played a major factor in its popularity. “No one can deny that the evils provoking reform in the Church were deep rooted and widespread” wrote Hilaire Belloc. “They threatened the very life of Christendom itself.” (Heresies, p. 94)
If such a violent reaction was provoked against the Church in the 16th century, then it is quite plausible that such a violent reaction against Rome could happen as something provoked by the pederastic network tolerated by the Vatican. Just as Sodom thrives in the Vatican today (it paid 20 million euros for twenty apartments right next to Europa Multiclub, Italy’s most popular homosexual bath house), so in the Catholic world in the 16th century there were also citizens of Sodom. One of Rome’s top artists was Giovanni Antonio Bazzi, who proudly called himself Il Sodoma (the sodomite. He was also called Matazo or “the madman”).
There were even Cardinals who were considered effeminate, which is just another way of saying homosexual. And the rage against this effeminacy would be unleashed when the fighters of the Emperor Charles would strike Rome. With an army of 700 lancers, 800 cavalry, 3,000 Italian adventurers, 5,000 Spanish soldiers and 10,000 German mercenaries, the city was going to be overtaken by an utter nightmare. When they finally broke through Rome’s defenses, Spanish imperial soldiers rushed into the Borgo screaming “Spain! Spain! Kill! Kill!” The whole Borgo became a slaughterhouse. Some of the defenders fled only to drown in the Tiber. The Swiss Guards put up a fight right by the obelisk in front of St. Peter’s Basilica, only to be cut to pieces. The imperial soldiers, seeing that there was no one to oppose them, went through the Borgo killing all who they came across. They took the commander of the Swiss Guards, Roust (who was heavily wounded) and murdered him in front of his wife. Not even a hospital was spared as almost all of the patients were butchered. As a monk from the monastery of San Salvatore recounted: “Everyone in the Santo Spirito hospital was killed apart from from the few who managed to flee.”
The same monk also recorded that imperial fighters charged into an orphanage in La Pieta and killed everyone inside, and many of the children “were thrown from the windows into the street.” The Pope had been attending mass in St. Peter’s Basilica when the invasion began, but in the midst of the chaos he decided to flee to the Castel Sant’Angelo. While he made his way to the edifice, an immense crowd of panicking people were all seeking refuge in the same place. However, the Pope had a papal escape route that led right into the castello. Him and his entourage met the sight of Spanish troops who then opened fire on them. The huge crowd of fleeing people trembled into the castle, their horrified faces and trepidatious bodies jumbled together like a mass of chaos and hysteria, their terrifying voices chilling the air as they resounded to the ears amidst a deluge of destruction. An elderly Cardinal named Antonio Pucci was knocked down and trampled by the panicking crowd.  So many people were trying to enter the castle that there was no way to even shut the gates. The Pope needed to get inside, and those who were deemed as having no use were cast out.
As Pesaro of Zara recorded: “The pope was told that there were many people in the castle, most of them of no military use, and there was little grain, so many of the useless ones were thrown out.”  Cardinal Pucci managed to get inside by being carried up by rope through a window. The chaos continued. One military commander, Giuliano the Florentine, was seen “tearing at his face and sobbing bitterly” as he witnessed his wife and child being raped. The invaders, as one observer wrote, “threw the bodies of little children out of doorways into the street. And women were dragged out and outraged on the ground … crying and wailing so loudly that all the city could hear.” In the midst of the wailing and the ravishing, the blood splatter and the incessant gore, a multitude of priests were seen completely naked, left in a state of humiliation. A witness wrote of how  “large numbers of the priests are naked and that it is a terrible thing to see the great number of dead, and most of all the little children younger than ten years old”. He also spoke of how the invaders “are exhausted from lack of sleep, drunk on blood, killing everything”. Francesco Guicciardini, an historian who lived in the time of the sacking, gives us an idea of the horror:
<blockquote readability="11">
“In the streets there were many corpses. Many nobles lay there cut to pieces, covered with mud and their own blood, and many people only half dead lay miserably on the ground. Sometimes in that ghastly scene a child or man would be seen jumping from a window, forced to jump or jumping voluntarily to escape becoming the living prey of these monsters and finally ending their lives horribly in the street.”
</blockquote>
The Landsknecht took a donkey and dressed it with priestly vestments. They then ordered a priest to feed the Eucharist to the mule, and when he refused they murdered him. They took priests and monks and shed their blood right on top of the altars and raped young nuns. The altar in St. Peter’s Basilica was piled with the slaughtered bodies of those who fled into the infamous church thinking that they would be protected from the invaders. As they butchered these people on the altar, one after the other, the Landsknecht cried out: “Long live Pope Luther!”, unleashing their Protestant frenzy at the Church that they saw as the Harlot of Babylon. “If anyone had been walking through the streets of Rome by day or night,” wrote Guicciardini, “he would have heard not sighs and tearful laments, but pitiful cries and screams of hapless prisoners coming from every house and building.” (See Foster & Marcovitz, Rome, p. 100). In the end, around 45,000 people were slaughtered, wounded or exiled.
Guicciardini described the miserable state of the clergymen under the Landsknecht’s reign of terror, and he mentions something that indicates the spirit of Sodom in the Vatican:
<blockquote readability="11">
“many of these men wore torn and disgraceful habits, others were without shoes. Some in ripped and bloody shirts had cuts and bruises all over their bodies from the indiscriminate whippings and beatings they had received. Some had thick and greasy beards. Some had their faces branded, and some were missing teeth; others were without noses or ears. Some were castrated and so depressed and terrified that they failed to show in any way the vain and effeminate delicacy and lasciviousness that they had put on with such excessive energy for so many years in their earlier, happier days.”   
</blockquote>
Guicciardini describes the clergy as living an effeminate lifestyle prior to being devastated by the Landsknecht and imperial forces, indicating that homosexuality was prevalent within the Vatican, and these German fanatics, seeing themselves as the scourge of God against the Harlot of Babylon, rained down fury upon them. With this, it is not far-fetched to see how such destruction could come upon the Vatican again. Right before the destruction of Jerusalem, the Jews of that city “indulged themselves in feminine wantonness” (Josephus, Wars, 4.9.10). Before the sack of Rome in 1527, the clergy indulged themselves in “effeminate delicacy”. And today, the whole of the Vatican has been overtaken by Sodom. What fate awaits for Rome when God Himself did not spare Jerusalem?
When St. Paul wrote of men who “gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another”, it was in a letter addressed to the Church of Rome (Romans 1:27), and today the same Church has rejected the warning of St. Paul, with even the Pope himself exhorting sodomite civil unions. St. Paul warned the Roman Church of the coming wrath for such evils: “We know that the judgment of God rightly falls on those who practice such things.” (Romans 2:2) And: “But because of your hard and impenitent heart you are storing up wrath for yourself on the day of wrath when God’s righteous judgment will be revealed.” (Romans 2:5) Romans 1 and 2 are not simply about moral conduct, but a prophecy for the day of wrath. Perhaps, in the future, another army — like the Landsknecht — will see themselves as the scourge of God, unleashing their rage on a wicked Church, and in this, the wrath upon Sodom will reveal itself.
 
 
source <a href="https://shoebat.com/2021/08/18/the-fangs-of-the-priests-the-destruction-of-rome-and-why-catholic-parishioners-are-to-blame-for-the-pedophile-crisis-in-the-church/">https://shoebat.com/2021/08/18/the-fangs-of-the-priests-the-destruction-of-rome-and-why-catholic-parishioners-are-to-blame-for-the-pedophile-crisis-in-the-church/</a>

armageddon The Fangs Of The Priests: The Destruction Of Rome And Why Catholic Parishioners Are To Blame For The Pedophile Crisis In The Church

The Sack of Rome in 1527 By The Shoebats If Christ called the Temple a den of thieves, then the Church of Rome has become a den of preda...

PJW Live: Europe Facing Another Refugee Crisis

The British government has claimed that it intends to send private security contractors to knock on the doors of anyone returning from holidays to make sure they are quarantining upon their return, as required by law.
Home Secretary Priti Patel <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9597685/Priti-Patel-reveals-plans-10-000-quarantine-checks-day.html">announced Wednesday</a> that those returning from destinations that have not been added to the government’s ‘green list’ should expect to be checked on at their homes.
The warning comes after the government lifted international travel restrictions on Monday, allowing people to go on holiday, but with extensive caveats.
Patel claimed that 10,000 checks will be conducted every day by private contractors hired <a href="https://www.mitie.com/all-services/security-fire/?filter-service=security-and-fire&filter-search=">via the firm Mitie</a>, and if people are found to be flouting quarantine or acting noncompliant, police will be called to deal with them, with the authorisation to issue fines of up to £10,000.
The government has decreed that a negative PCR test and ten day quarantine is required for anyone returning from countries it has not deemed to be completely safe to visit, including the popular destinations of The U.S., France, Spain and Greece.
Those returning will then have to take a further two PCR tests (at their own expense) and test negative to be allowed out of their houses after the ten day period.
“People will not go unchecked,” Patel threatened. adding “Significant resources have been put in place – millions of pounds – in terms of the follow-up checking of people around their testing and making sure they stay at home. It has been stepped up.”
Discouraging travel to so called ‘amber list’ countries, Transport Secretary Grant Shapps <a href="https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-travel-expect-knock-on-the-door-when-you-return-from-amber-countries-priti-patel-warns-12311649">told Sky News</a> Thursday that “You’ve got to quarantine. People will come to your house to check your quarantine. It’s expensive. We’re not at the stage of saying to people, go to those places on holiday. Please don’t.”
Health Secretary Matt Hancock also claimed that the door to door checks are already underway, with 30,000 being conducted last week.
Boris Johnson told MPs yesterday that visits to medium-risk destinations are only acceptable in ‘extreme circumstances’. 
The announcement came after millions of people had already booked trips to the destinations, and in many cases have already arrived there, prompting fury from travellers, airlines and booking agents.
Julia Lo Bue-Said, of Advantage Travel Partnership described the government’s actions as “typical nanny state tactics.”
She added “Surely the British public can make up their own mind if they wish to quarantine in order to visit an amber country. As long as protocols are followed, testing is in place and rules in the destination are adhered to we see no reason why we cannot be allowed to travel safely to amber destinations for leisure. Otherwise, make those amber countries red.”
In related news, it has been revealed that UK ‘Covid passports’ officially rolled out for use during international travel <a href="https://summit.news/2021/05/20/privacy-watchdog-uk-covid-passport-small-print-says-it-will-be-used-domestically/">will eventually be used domestically</a> to restrict the movement of the population, according to the small print on the NHS website.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter:
——————————————————————————————————————— 
Brand new merch now available! Get it at <a href="https://www.pjwshop.com/">https://www.pjwshop.com/</a> <a href="https://www.pjwshop.com/"><img alt="PJW Shop" border="0" height="600" src="https://cdn.summit.news/2021/03/merch.jpg" width="348" /></a>
ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
We need you to sign up for our free newsletter <a href="https://summit.news/newsletter">here</a>.
Support our sponsor – <a href="https://bit.ly/TURBOFORCE">Turbo Force</a> – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Also, we urgently need your financial support <a href="https://www.subscribestar.com/paul-joseph-watson">here</a>. ———————————————————————————————————————
 
 
source <a href="https://summit.news/2021/08/18/pjw-live-europe-facing-another-refugee-crisis/">https://summit.news/2021/08/18/pjw-live-europe-facing-another-refugee-crisis/</a>

revolution summit PJW Live: Europe Facing Another Refugee Crisis

The British government has claimed that it intends to send private security contractors to knock on the doors of anyone returning from holid...

Video: Australian Police Pepper Spray Children For Not Wearing Face Masks

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has mimicked Australia’s top public health official by telling citizens, “Don’t talk to your neighbors,” after the country went into full lockdown as a result of just a single COVID case being detected.
As we <a href="https://summit.news/2021/08/17/entire-country-of-new-zealand-put-under-lockdown-after-just-one-single-covid-case/">highlighted</a> earlier, the entire country has been placed under lockdown for three days, with Auckland in lockdown for a week, following the discovery of a single coronavirus infection in the coastal town of Coromandel.
Citizens are now being told to avoid work, school and leisure activities while only venturing outside for “essential” reasons like purchasing food.
However, Ardern went further, claiming the risk of passing on the infection was so high that people shouldn’t even have conversations with their own neighbors.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true" readability="7.2173913043478">
JUST IN – New Zealand to enter nationwide lockdown after detecting 1st local case for 170 days: "Do not talk to your neighbors."<a href="https://t.co/jCJSU5g0nw">pic.twitter.com/jCJSU5g0nw</a>
— Disclose.tv 🚨 (@disclosetv) <a href="https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1427562820552601600?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 17, 2021</a>
</blockquote>
“Stay local and do not congregate, don’t talk to your neighbors, please keep to your bubbles,” said Ardern.
“We know from overseas cases of the delta variant that it can be spread by people simply walking past one another – so keep those movements outside to the bare minimum, wear a mask, and make sure you keep up that physical distancing,” she added.
Arden is basically repeating what the chief health officer of New South Wales told Australians last month.
“Whilst it’s human nature to engage in conversation with others, to be friendly, unfortunately this is not the time to do that,” said Dr. Kerry Chant.
“So even if you run into your next door neighbor in the shopping center…don’t start up a conversation, now is the time for minimizing your interactions with others, even if you’ve got a mask, do not think that affords total protection, we wanna be absolutely sure that as we go about our daily lives we do not come into contact with anyone else that would pose a risk,” she added.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true" readability="8.1860465116279">
SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA.
DON’T ACT LIKE A HUMAN. DON’T TALK TO YOUR FRIENDS, EVEN WHEN MASKED. DON’T BE FRIENDLY. THIS IS NOT THE TIME. <a href="https://t.co/iiPgz2D8Bb">pic.twitter.com/iiPgz2D8Bb</a>
— NoRisk_NoReward (@noreward_norisk) <a href="https://twitter.com/noreward_norisk/status/1417426275313065985?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 20, 2021</a>
</blockquote>
Why are authorities in Australia and New Zealand so insistent on people not talking to each other?
Perhaps because if enough of them did, authorities would come under enough pressure to reverse the disastrous ‘zero COVID’ policy which means both countries could be under some form of on and off lockdown for years to come.
New Zealand has followed many of the same draconian restrictions imposed by neighboring country Australia, with authorities previously <a href="https://summit.news/2020/08/14/new-zealand-says-it-will-put-all-new-covid-infectees-their-family-members-in-quarantine-facilities/">announcing</a> that they will put all coronavirus infectees and their close family members in “quarantine facilities” even if they refuse.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter:
———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at <a href="https://www.pjwshop.com/">https://www.pjwshop.com/</a>
<a href="https://www.pjwshop.com/"><img alt="PJW Shop" border="0" height="600" src="https://cdn.summit.news/2021/07/merch.jpg" width="348" /></a>
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter <a href="https://summit.news/newsletter">here</a>.
Support my sponsor – <a href="https://bit.ly/TURBOFORCE">Turbo Force</a> – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on <a href="https://pauljosephwatson.locals.com/">Locals</a>.
———————————————————————————————————————
 
 
source <a href="https://summit.news/2021/08/18/video-australian-police-pepper-spray-children-for-not-wearing-face-masks/">https://summit.news/2021/08/18/video-australian-police-pepper-spray-children-for-not-wearing-face-masks/</a>

revolution summit Video: Australian Police Pepper Spray Children For Not Wearing Face Masks

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has mimicked Australia’s top public health official by telling citizens, “Don’t talk to your neigh...

The World Economic Forum’s Totally Not Creepy New Idea

A Labour Councillor faced ridicule after she bragged on Twitter about wearing a face mask on an empty train.
Not all heroes wear capes.
“Going to keep wearing my mask on public transport. Even when it’s just me on the tube,” tweeted Alice Perry.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true" readability="6.8198757763975">
Going to keep wearing my mask on public transport. Even when it’s just me on the tube. <a href="https://t.co/0Ttsg3c9hT">pic.twitter.com/0Ttsg3c9hT</a>
— Alice Perry (@aliceperryuk) <a href="https://twitter.com/aliceperryuk/status/1417042780992462850?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 19, 2021</a>
</blockquote>
Numerous respondents pointed out that Perry must have been disappointed that no one on the train could see how compliant and virtuous she was, which is why she decided to take selfie and post it to Twitter.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true" readability="7.8947368421053">
But even when you're alone, you have to post a selfie on the internet to signal your virtue. <a href="https://t.co/3Wz8l9P5cW">https://t.co/3Wz8l9P5cW</a>
— TheEndOfEverything (@EternalEnglish) <a href="https://twitter.com/EternalEnglish/status/1419278853336453127?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 25, 2021</a>
</blockquote>
“This pandemic has provided an opportunity for normies to feel like heroes for being absolutely useless, and they endlessly gloat about it too,” reacted one person.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true" readability="8.4">
This pandemic has provided an opportunity for normies to feel like heroes for being absolutely useless, and they endlessly gloat about it too. <a href="https://t.co/PnycfFkfIs">https://t.co/PnycfFkfIs</a>
— ɐ͎ʞ͎ć͎ı͎ɹ͎ɐ͎ɯ͎ (@LeaMaric) <a href="https://twitter.com/LeaMaric/status/1419296809609007105?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 25, 2021</a>
</blockquote>
“This is evidence of irrational though, psychological trauma and human conditioning. People need leadership to break this cycle, not encourage it,” opined lawyer Viva Frei.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true" readability="8.6044444444444">
This is evidence of irrational though, psychological trauma and human conditioning. People need leadership to break this cycle, not encourage it <a href="https://twitter.com/aliceperryuk?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@aliceperryuk</a> <a href="https://t.co/PmfX46rCT1">https://t.co/PmfX46rCT1</a>
— Viva Frei (@thevivafrei) <a href="https://twitter.com/thevivafrei/status/1419260185604919298?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 25, 2021</a>
</blockquote>
“What bravery and sacrifice,” remarked Aubrey Huff.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true" readability="5.4736842105263">
What bravery and sacrifice. 🤦🏻‍♂️ <a href="https://t.co/0KDBJDnXcA">https://t.co/0KDBJDnXcA</a>
— Aubrey Huff (@aubrey_huff) <a href="https://twitter.com/aubrey_huff/status/1419282314039762948?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 25, 2021</a>
</blockquote>
Perry’s bizarre tweet underscores once again how the mask has little to do with virus protection and everything to do with signaling subservience to the cult of conformity.
As previously <a href="https://summit.news/2021/07/19/government-advisor-admits-masks-are-purely-comfort-blankets-that-do-virtually-nothing/">highlighted</a>, Dr Colin Axon, a SAGE advisor for the government, dismissed face masks as “comfort blankets” that do virtually nothing, noting that the COVID-19 virus particle is up to 5,000 times smaller than the holes in the mask.
“The small sizes are not easily understood but an imperfect analogy would be to imagine marbles fired at builders’ scaffolding, some might hit a pole and rebound, but obviously most will fly through,” Axon said.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter:
———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at <a href="https://www.pjwshop.com/">https://www.pjwshop.com/</a>
<a href="https://www.pjwshop.com/"><img alt="PJW Shop" border="0" height="600" src="https://cdn.summit.news/2021/07/merch.jpg" width="348" /></a>
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter <a href="https://summit.news/newsletter">here</a>.
Support my sponsor – <a href="https://bit.ly/TURBOFORCE">Turbo Force</a> – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on <a href="https://pauljosephwatson.locals.com/">Locals</a>.
———————————————————————————————————————
 
 
source <a href="https://summit.news/2021/08/18/the-world-economic-forums-totally-not-creepy-new-idea/">https://summit.news/2021/08/18/the-world-economic-forums-totally-not-creepy-new-idea/</a>

revolution summit The World Economic Forum’s Totally Not Creepy New Idea

A Labour Councillor faced ridicule after she bragged on Twitter about wearing a face mask on an empty train. Not all heroes wear capes. “G...

Questions Over Why Twitter Gives Taliban a Platform While Banning American Dissidents

YouTube suspended Rand Paul for questioning the efficacy of face masks despite the fact that the Senator’s comments were virtually identical to those made by Biden’s former COVID adviser Dr. Michael Osterholm on CNN just a week ago.
Yes, really.
As we <a href="https://summit.news/2021/08/11/youtube-censors-rand-paul-video-in-which-he-slammed-youtube-censorship/">highlighted</a> earlier, Paul has been blocked from uploading to YouTube for a week and his entire channel faces possible deletion after the Google-owned company claimed the Senator had again violated its “COVID misinformation” policy.
The Senator’s speech crime was to cite two scientific studies that prove cloth masks have no substantial effect on halting the spread of coronaviruses.
“Saying cloth masks work, when they don’t, actually risks lives, as someone may choose to care for a loved one with COVID while only wearing a cloth mask. This is not only bad advice but also potentially deadly misinformation,” Paul said in the video removed by YouTube.
However, as journalist Glenn Greenwald points out today, Joe Biden’s former COVID adviser, the epidemiologist Michael Osterholm, told CNN virtually the same thing just last week.
Speaking about cloth masks, Osterholm said, “They actually only have very little impact in reducing the amount of virus that you inhale or exhale out.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true" readability="10.981366459627">
Here's Dr. Osterholm on CNN saying exactly the same thing that <a href="https://twitter.com/RandPaul?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RandPaul</a> just got suspended from YouTube for saying: that cloth masks, as opposed to N95s, provide very, very little protection. Why can yo say this on CNN or PBS but not YouTube????<a href="https://t.co/gHJodnERL7">pic.twitter.com/gHJodnERL7</a>
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) <a href="https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1425486313831243778?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 11, 2021</a>
</blockquote>
Osterholm went on to express his disappointment at public health officials improperly informing the American public about the efficacy of masks.
“Here’s Dr. Osterholm on CNN saying exactly the same thing that @RandPaul just got suspended from YouTube for saying: that cloth masks, as opposed to N95s, provide very, very little protection. Why can you say this on CNN or PBS but not YouTube????” asked Greenwald.
Greenwald noted how the deplatforming of Alex Jones back in 2018 has now led to a situation “where almost no dissent is allowed.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true" readability="11.444444444444">
Just look at the number of liberals cheering and justifying YouTube's suspension of Rand Paul for his comments on masks — ones echoed by Biden's own former COVID adviser — and you'll see why this faction is completely authoritarian.
They crave corporate speech policing.
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) <a href="https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1425492971605184517?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 11, 2021</a>
</blockquote>
“Just look at the number of liberals cheering and justifying YouTube’s suspension of Rand Paul for his comments on masks — ones echoed by Biden’s own former COVID adviser — and you’ll see why this faction is completely authoritarian,” said Greenwald. “They crave corporate speech policing.”
Numerous top public health officials have also pointed out that face masks are largely useless, including Dr. Anthony Fauci himself.
In a February 2020 email, Fauci <a href="https://summit.news/2021/06/02/in-february-2020-email-fauci-wrote-face-masks-not-effective-in-keeping-out-virus/">wrote</a> that a typical store-bought face mask “is not really effective in keeping out virus, which is small enough to pass through material.”
As previously <a href="https://summit.news/2021/07/19/government-advisor-admits-masks-are-purely-comfort-blankets-that-do-virtually-nothing/">highlighted</a>, Dr Colin Axon, a SAGE advisor for the UK government, dismissed face masks as “comfort blankets” that do virtually nothing, noting that the COVID-19 virus particle is up to 5,000 times smaller than the holes in the mask.
“The small sizes are not easily understood but an imperfect analogy would be to imagine marbles fired at builders’ scaffolding, some might hit a pole and rebound, but obviously most will fly through,” Axon said.
A peer reviewed study involving 6,000 participants in Denmark revealed that “there was no statistically significant difference between those who wore masks and those who did not when it came to being infected by Covid-19,” the Spectator <a href="https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/do-masks-stop-the-spread-of-covid-19-">reported</a>.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter:
———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at <a href="https://www.pjwshop.com/">https://www.pjwshop.com/</a>
<a href="https://www.pjwshop.com/"><img alt="PJW Shop" border="0" height="600" src="https://cdn.summit.news/2021/07/merch.jpg" width="348" /></a>
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter <a href="https://summit.news/newsletter">here</a>.
Support my sponsor – <a href="https://bit.ly/TURBOFORCE">Turbo Force</a> – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on <a href="https://pauljosephwatson.locals.com/">Locals</a>.
———————————————————————————————————————
 
 
source <a href="https://summit.news/2021/08/18/questions-over-why-twitter-gives-taliban-a-platform-while-banning-american-dissidents/">https://summit.news/2021/08/18/questions-over-why-twitter-gives-taliban-a-platform-while-banning-american-dissidents/</a>

revolution summit Questions Over Why Twitter Gives Taliban a Platform While Banning American Dissidents

YouTube suspended Rand Paul for questioning the efficacy of face masks despite the fact that the Senator’s comments were virtually identical...

Diplomat: “Not Even Tanks” Can Stop Large Wave of Afghan Refugees Heading to Europe

Despite Europe heavily fortifying its borders since the 2015 crisis, a top diplomat warns that “not even tanks” can stop a potentially large wave of Afghan refugees heading to the continent.
Even before the Taliban took control of Afghanistan, up to 30,000 people were fleeing the country every single week.
Humanitarian development worker Sybille Schnehage told German broadcaster WDR on Sunday, “We can assume that up to three million Afghans will make their way to Europe in the foreseeable future.”
Schnehage explained how the refugees are intent on leaving the Middle East entirely and settling in European welfare havens where the state partially subsidizes their lives.
“I always ask people: Why don’t you go to Saudi Arabia? They are Muslims. This is your culture. The answer is always: No, Germany is better.”
Although many experts think that Europe’s efforts to strengthen its ports of entry since 2015 will prevent a repeat of the 2015 invasion, others aren’t so confident.
According to Politico’s Bruno Maçães, “Europeans have to realize a new refugee wave now seems inevitable.”
Maçães <a href="https://www.politico.eu/article/afghanistan-crisis-war-taliban-europe-problem/">asked</a> a diplomat in Kabul, who opined that no amount of high-tech surveillance or beefed up border controls can stop an influx of people if their numbers are large enough.
“When the numbers are high enough, nothing can stop them. Not even tanks,” said the diplomat.
Wary of upcoming elections where they will face opposition from anti-immigration populists, European leaders like Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron are scrambling to prevent a repeat of 2015, when over a million migrants entered Europe, a crisis that led to massive social dislocation, rising violent crime and multiple ISIS-inspired terror attacks.
[embedded content]
Armin Laschet, the head of the Christian Democratic Union and the man most likely to replace Chancellor Angela Merkel, said “2015 should not be repeated.”
Macron has called for a “robust, coordinated and united response” in order to protect the continent from “major irregular migratory flows.”
However, two countries that bore the brunt of the previous refugee crisis, Greece and Turkey, have indicated that they will put up stern resistance to absorbing large numbers of migrants fleeing Afghanistan.
Notis Mitarachi, Greece’s minister for migration, told Reuters that his country “will not and cannot” become a gateway for migrants and refugees trying to reach the EU.
After signing a 6 billion euros ($7.03 billion) deal with the EU, Turkey is already home to 4 million refugees, the largest such population in the world.
Turks are already deeply concerned about the economic impact this has had on their country and are loathe to accept any more migrants.
“Turkish public opinion is openly against any further arrivals, particularly from Afghanistan, whose culture and customs differ markedly from Turkey’s,” said Wolfango Piccoli, co-president of consultancy firm Teneo.
As we document in the video above, while the media is now re-framing “refugees” as basically anyone who doesn’t like their own government, the vast majority of Afghan “refugees” are in fact economic migrants.
The UK government has also announced that Afghan “refugees” will be allowed to enter the country without even showing a passport.
Home Secretary Priti Patel has also called on other European countries to follow the UK’s lead in providing “support to the most vulnerable fleeing Afghanistan so they can start a new life in safety in the UK, away from the tyranny and oppression they face in Afghanistan.”
While refusing to stay in closer safe havens like Saudi Arabia or Turkey, many will seek to exploit the weakness of western governments and the strength of European borders, including violent criminals and terrorists.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter:
———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at <a href="https://www.pjwshop.com/">https://www.pjwshop.com/</a>
<a href="https://www.pjwshop.com/"><img alt="PJW Shop" border="0" height="600" src="https://cdn.summit.news/2021/07/merch.jpg" width="348" /></a>
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter <a href="https://summit.news/newsletter">here</a>.
Support my sponsor – <a href="https://bit.ly/TURBOFORCE">Turbo Force</a> – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on <a href="https://pauljosephwatson.locals.com/">Locals</a>.
———————————————————————————————————————
 
 
source <a href="https://summit.news/2021/08/18/diplomat-not-even-tanks-can-stop-large-wave-of-afghan-refugees-heading-to-europe/">https://summit.news/2021/08/18/diplomat-not-even-tanks-can-stop-large-wave-of-afghan-refugees-heading-to-europe/</a>

revolution summit Diplomat: “Not Even Tanks” Can Stop Large Wave of Afghan Refugees Heading to Europe

Despite Europe heavily fortifying its borders since the 2015 crisis, a top diplomat warns that “not even tanks” can stop a potentially large...