ANONYMOUS - OUR VOICE

SHOCKING! – U.K. Government release 13th report on Adverse Reactions to the Covid Vaccines

The number 13 is viewed as unlucky by many, and after reading the UK Governments 13th update on adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines, we imagine there are hundreds of thousands of people who are feeling extremely unlucky right now.
The 13th update includes reports made to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme of adverse reactions to the Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Moderna jabs up to the 21st April 2021. At this point the Moderna jab has only just begun to be administered in the UK after receiving emergency authorisation just like the Pfizer and AstraZeneca jab had previously.
The emergency authorisation means that the manufacturers of the vaccines, in this case Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca are not liable for any injuries that may occur after their vaccines have been administered. Why are they only under emergency use authorisation? Because they are still in phase three trials until 2023, which means they are currently experimental.
According to the MHRA, adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines are currently occurring in 1 in every 166 people. However this rate is most likely significantly higher due to only 1-10% of adverse reactions actually being reported to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme.
We took a dive into the UK Governments 13th update on adverse reactions to the Covid jabs and this is what we found…
(We used the data shown in the UK Governments Analysis Print of the Pfizer vaccine {<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/970504/COVID-19_mRNA_Pfizer-_BioNTech_Vaccine_Analysis_Print.pdf" target="_blank">which you can find here</a>} + Analysis Print of the Oxford Vaccine {<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/970505/COVID-19_AstraZeneca_Vaccine_Analysis_Print.pdf" target="_blank">which you can find here</a>}.)
The total number of blood disorders reported as adverse reactions to both the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccine now stands at 9723 as of the 21st April 2021. This includes ailments such as thrombocytopenia which is where your body has a low level of platelets in the blood. Severe forms of this ailment can lead to bleeding spontaneously from the eyes, gums, or bladder and can result in death. Which is exactly what has happened in the case of the Pfizer vaccine, with 53 cases of thrombocytopenia being reported which have resulted in 1 death thus far.
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img alt="" class="wp-image-6422" data-attachment-id="6422" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-description="" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="image-1" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-1.png?fit=639%2C236&ssl=1" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-1.png?fit=300%2C111&ssl=1" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-1.png?fit=869%2C321&ssl=1" data-orig-size="869,321" data-permalink="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/01/shocking-u-k-government-release-13th-report-on-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-vaccines/image-1-9/" data-recalc-dims="1" height="236" loading="lazy" sizes="(max-width: 639px) 100vw, 639px" src="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-1.png?resize=639%2C236&ssl=1" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-1.png?w=869&ssl=1 869w, https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-1.png?resize=300%2C111&ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-1.png?resize=768%2C284&ssl=1 768w" width="639" /></figure>
</div>
The AstraZeneca vaccine has caused 3 deaths due to thrombocytopenia, with 398 cases being reported to the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme as of the 21st April 2021. On the 21st March there had only been 44 reported cases, meaning the number has increased almost 10-fold in just a month.
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img alt="" class="wp-image-6420" data-attachment-id="6420" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-description="" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="image" data-large-file="https://i1.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image.png?fit=639%2C225&ssl=1" data-medium-file="https://i1.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image.png?fit=300%2C106&ssl=1" data-orig-file="https://i1.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image.png?fit=876%2C309&ssl=1" data-orig-size="876,309" data-permalink="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/01/shocking-u-k-government-release-13th-report-on-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-vaccines/image-208/" data-recalc-dims="1" height="226" loading="lazy" sizes="(max-width: 639px) 100vw, 639px" src="https://i1.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image.png?resize=639%2C226&ssl=1" srcset="https://i1.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image.png?w=876&ssl=1 876w, https://i1.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image.png?resize=300%2C106&ssl=1 300w, https://i1.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image.png?resize=768%2C271&ssl=1 768w" width="639" /></figure>
</div>
The total number of cardiac disorders reported as adverse reactions to both the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccine now stands at 7,699 with a total of 133 people sadly passing away after suffering a cardiac disorder adverse reaction to one of the two jabs. This includes serious events such as cardiac arrest of which the Pfizer jab has caused 55 times so far, with 20 of these resulting in death.
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img alt="" class="wp-image-6423" data-attachment-id="6423" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-description="" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="image-2" data-large-file="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-2.png?fit=639%2C166&ssl=1" data-medium-file="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-2.png?fit=300%2C78&ssl=1" data-orig-file="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-2.png?fit=851%2C221&ssl=1" data-orig-size="851,221" data-permalink="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/01/shocking-u-k-government-release-13th-report-on-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-vaccines/image-2-10/" data-recalc-dims="1" height="166" loading="lazy" sizes="(max-width: 638px) 100vw, 638px" src="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-2.png?resize=638%2C166&ssl=1" srcset="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-2.png?w=851&ssl=1 851w, https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-2.png?resize=300%2C78&ssl=1 300w, https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-2.png?resize=768%2C199&ssl=1 768w" width="638" /></figure>
</div>
The Oxford jab has caused 103 people to suffer cardiac arrest so far with 23 of these sadly resulting in death. What’s also interesting to note here is the difference in the number of cardiac disorders occurring between the two vaccines. The MHRA are constantly telling us that there is no cause for concern as the adverse reactions that are occurring are in line with what we would expect to see within the general population. However if this were the case shouldn’t we be seeing a similar rate of occurrence to number of vaccines administered for both jabs?
There have been roughly 18 million doses of the Pfizer vaccine administered and around 26 million doses of the AstraZeneca jab administered. So that’s 44% more AstraZeneca jabs administered than the Pfizer jab as of the 21st April 2021. However there have been 1901 cardiac disorders as a result of the Pfizer jab and 5798 cardiac disorders as a result of the AstraZeneca jab. That accounts to 204.9% more cardiac disorders occurring due to the AstraZeneca vaccine compared to the Pfizer vaccine. Shouldn’t it be around 44% more if we are to believe the MHRA that there is no cause for concern?
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img alt="" class="wp-image-6425" data-attachment-id="6425" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-description="" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="image-3" data-large-file="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-3.png?fit=639%2C180&ssl=1" data-medium-file="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-3.png?fit=300%2C84&ssl=1" data-orig-file="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-3.png?fit=878%2C247&ssl=1" data-orig-size="878,247" data-permalink="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/01/shocking-u-k-government-release-13th-report-on-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-vaccines/image-3-8/" data-recalc-dims="1" height="179" loading="lazy" sizes="(max-width: 639px) 100vw, 639px" src="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-3.png?resize=639%2C179&ssl=1" srcset="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-3.png?w=878&ssl=1 878w, https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-3.png?resize=300%2C84&ssl=1 300w, https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-3.png?resize=768%2C216&ssl=1 768w" width="639" /></figure>
</div>
Next we come to eye disorders, due to both types of Covid vaccine there have been 10,633 eye disorders reported to the MHRA as adverse reactions as of the 21st April 2021. This includes people losing the ability to see all together, with the number of people now blind as a result of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine now standing at 31.
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img alt="" class="wp-image-6427" data-attachment-id="6427" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-description="" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="image-4" data-large-file="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-4.png?fit=639%2C165&ssl=1" data-medium-file="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-4.png?fit=300%2C77&ssl=1" data-orig-file="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-4.png?fit=857%2C221&ssl=1" data-orig-size="857,221" data-permalink="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/01/shocking-u-k-government-release-13th-report-on-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-vaccines/image-4-8/" data-recalc-dims="1" height="165" loading="lazy" sizes="(max-width: 639px) 100vw, 639px" src="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-4.png?resize=639%2C165&ssl=1" srcset="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-4.png?w=857&ssl=1 857w, https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-4.png?resize=300%2C77&ssl=1 300w, https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-4.png?resize=768%2C198&ssl=1 768w" width="639" /></figure>
</div>
But the AstraZeneca jab fares much worse with 134 people now blind as a result of having the Oxford jab. But this is an increase of 332.5% compared to the Pfizer jab, this doesn’t sound like the statistical norm. to us. The same can be said when comparing the total number of eye disorders. There have been 2322 eye disorders reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer jab, but there’s been a whopping 8311 reported as adverse reactions to the AstraZeneca jab. That’s a 257.9% difference, not 44% which is surely what it should be if in line with the norm.?
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img alt="" class="wp-image-6428" data-attachment-id="6428" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-description="" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="image-5" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-5.png?fit=639%2C238&ssl=1" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-5.png?fit=300%2C112&ssl=1" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-5.png?fit=862%2C321&ssl=1" data-orig-size="862,321" data-permalink="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/01/shocking-u-k-government-release-13th-report-on-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-vaccines/image-5-7/" data-recalc-dims="1" height="238" loading="lazy" sizes="(max-width: 639px) 100vw, 639px" src="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-5.png?resize=639%2C238&ssl=1" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-5.png?w=862&ssl=1 862w, https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-5.png?resize=300%2C112&ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-5.png?resize=768%2C286&ssl=1 768w" width="639" /></figure>
</div>
Next up we have anaphylactic reactions. An anaphylactic reaction is a severe and potentially life-threatening reaction to a trigger. The trigger here being either the Pfizer jab or Oxford jab. Symptoms of anaphylaxis include feeling faint, finding it hard to breathe, a fast heartbeat and feeling anxious, and the condition needs to be treated in hospital at soon as possible. The Pfizer vaccine has accounted for 240 anaphylactic reactions so far.
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img alt="" class="wp-image-6435" data-attachment-id="6435" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-description="" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="image-9" data-large-file="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-9.png?fit=639%2C93&ssl=1" data-medium-file="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-9.png?fit=300%2C44&ssl=1" data-orig-file="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-9.png?fit=859%2C125&ssl=1" data-orig-size="859,125" data-permalink="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/01/shocking-u-k-government-release-13th-report-on-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-vaccines/image-9-6/" data-recalc-dims="1" height="93" loading="lazy" sizes="(max-width: 639px) 100vw, 639px" src="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-9.png?resize=639%2C93&ssl=1" srcset="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-9.png?w=859&ssl=1 859w, https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-9.png?resize=300%2C44&ssl=1 300w, https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-9.png?resize=768%2C112&ssl=1 768w" width="639" /></figure>
</div>
But the Oxford jab accounts for 462 cases of anaphylactic reaction, resulting in 1 death as of the 21st April 2021, according to the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme report.
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img alt="" class="wp-image-6434" data-attachment-id="6434" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-description="" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="image-8" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-8.png?fit=639%2C90&ssl=1" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-8.png?fit=300%2C42&ssl=1" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-8.png?fit=859%2C121&ssl=1" data-orig-size="859,121" data-permalink="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/01/shocking-u-k-government-release-13th-report-on-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-vaccines/image-8-7/" data-recalc-dims="1" height="90" loading="lazy" sizes="(max-width: 639px) 100vw, 639px" src="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-8.png?resize=639%2C90&ssl=1" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-8.png?w=859&ssl=1 859w, https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-8.png?resize=300%2C42&ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-8.png?resize=768%2C108&ssl=1 768w" width="639" /></figure>
</div>
Let’s rewind back to the eighth report released by the UK Government which covered adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines reported to the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme up to the 14th March 2021. Within that report we found that there had been an increase in the number of central nervous system haemmorrhages and cerebrovascular accidents. All different types of stroke – which happen due to the rupture of an artery or… blood clots.
In the eighth report we found that there had been 10 cases of cerebral haemorrhage resulting in 3 deaths, 4 cases of cerebral infarction resulting in 1 death, 4 cases of haemorrhagic stroke resulting in 1 death and 12 cases of ischaemic stroke among many others. As well as 85 cerebrovascular accidents resulting in 7 deaths. All reported as adverse reactions to the Oxford / AstraZeneca vaccine.
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter is-resized"><img alt="" height="271" loading="lazy" src="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/image-27.png?resize=639%2C271&ssl=1" width="639" /></figure>
</div>
Well just one month later, as of the 21st April 2021 the 10 cases of cerebral haemorrhage resulting in 3 deaths has increased to 93 cases of cerebral haemorrhage resulting in 25 deaths. That’s a 830% increase in the number of cases in just one month, and a 733.33% increase in the resultant deaths.
The 4 cases of cerebral infarction resulting in 1 death has increased to 37 cases of cerebral infarction resulting in 2 deaths. That’s a 825% increase in cases in just one month.
The 4 cases of haemorrhagic stroke resulting in 1 death has increased to 19 cases of haemorrhagic stroke in just one month resulting in 4 deaths. That’s a 125% increase in the number of cases, and a 375% increase in the number of resultant deaths.
The 12 cases of ischaemic stroke with 0 deaths has increased to 62 cases of ischaemic stroke resulting in 3 deaths. Thats a 416.6% increase in the number of cases in just one month.
The reason this is so shocking is that the previous numbers up to the 14th March were accounted for over a period of 10 weeks.
But the most shocking increase of all is in the number of cerebrovascular accidents. The 85 reported cerebrovascular accidents resulting in 7 deaths as of the 14th march 2021 has increased to 556 cases in just one month and the number of deaths has more than quadrupled to a total of 31. That is an astounding increase.
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img alt="" class="wp-image-6452" data-attachment-id="6452" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-description="" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="image-17" data-large-file="https://i1.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-17.png?fit=639%2C493&ssl=1" data-medium-file="https://i1.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-17.png?fit=300%2C231&ssl=1" data-orig-file="https://i1.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-17.png?fit=713%2C550&ssl=1" data-orig-size="713,550" data-permalink="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/01/shocking-u-k-government-release-13th-report-on-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-vaccines/image-17-6/" data-recalc-dims="1" height="493" loading="lazy" sizes="(max-width: 639px) 100vw, 639px" src="https://i1.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-17.png?resize=639%2C493&ssl=1" srcset="https://i1.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-17.png?w=713&ssl=1 713w, https://i1.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-17.png?resize=300%2C231&ssl=1 300w" width="639" /></figure>
</div>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img alt="" class="wp-image-6450" data-attachment-id="6450" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-description="" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="image-15" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-15.png?fit=639%2C275&ssl=1" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-15.png?fit=300%2C129&ssl=1" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-15.png?fit=759%2C327&ssl=1" data-orig-size="759,327" data-permalink="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/01/shocking-u-k-government-release-13th-report-on-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-vaccines/image-15-6/" data-recalc-dims="1" height="275" loading="lazy" sizes="(max-width: 639px) 100vw, 639px" src="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-15.png?resize=639%2C275&ssl=1" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-15.png?w=759&ssl=1 759w, https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-15.png?resize=300%2C129&ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-15.png?resize=350%2C150&ssl=1 350w" width="639" /></figure>
</div>
All the more shocking due to the fact the numbers occurring due to the Pfizer vaccine are nowhere near, yet only 44% more AstraZeneca jabs have been administered. The number of cerebrovascular accidents as of the 14th March 2021 due to the Pfizer vaccine stood at 71, with 3 of these resulting in death.
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter is-resized"><img alt="" height="283" loading="lazy" src="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/image-29.png?resize=639%2C283&ssl=1" width="639" /></figure>
</div>
Fast forward one month to the 21st April and that number increased to 176, another 105 too many, with the deaths increasing to 10. However the number to have occurred due to the Oxford jab is still 215.9% more than what has occurred due to the Pfizer jab. If this was in line with the norm. it should only be 44%. We are seeing an extremely serious issue unfold here.
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img alt="" class="wp-image-6451" data-attachment-id="6451" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-description="" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="image-16" data-large-file="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-16.png?fit=639%2C414&ssl=1" data-medium-file="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-16.png?fit=300%2C194&ssl=1" data-orig-file="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-16.png?fit=715%2C463&ssl=1" data-orig-size="715,463" data-permalink="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/01/shocking-u-k-government-release-13th-report-on-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-vaccines/image-16-6/" data-recalc-dims="1" height="414" loading="lazy" sizes="(max-width: 639px) 100vw, 639px" src="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-16.png?resize=639%2C414&ssl=1" srcset="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-16.png?w=715&ssl=1 715w, https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-16.png?resize=300%2C194&ssl=1 300w" width="639" /></figure>
</div>
The same pattern can also be seen in the number of cases of paralysis reported as adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines. With 39 reported cases being due to the Pfizer vaccine, but a whopping 192 reported cases being due to the AstraZeenca vaccine. That’s a 392% difference, not the 44% we should be seeing.
There have been 149,082 reported adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine as of the 21st April 2021, with 347 of these sadly resulting in death.
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img alt="" class="wp-image-6443" data-attachment-id="6443" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-description="" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="image-13" data-large-file="https://i1.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-13.png?fit=639%2C194&ssl=1" data-medium-file="https://i1.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-13.png?fit=300%2C91&ssl=1" data-orig-file="https://i1.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-13.png?fit=874%2C265&ssl=1" data-orig-size="874,265" data-permalink="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/01/shocking-u-k-government-release-13th-report-on-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-vaccines/image-13-6/" data-recalc-dims="1" height="194" loading="lazy" sizes="(max-width: 639px) 100vw, 639px" src="https://i1.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-13.png?resize=639%2C194&ssl=1" srcset="https://i1.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-13.png?w=874&ssl=1 874w, https://i1.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-13.png?resize=300%2C91&ssl=1 300w, https://i1.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-13.png?resize=768%2C233&ssl=1 768w" width="639" /></figure>
</div>
On the 21st march there had been 377,487 reported adverse reactions to the AstraZeneca vaccine with 421 of these sadly resulting in death. Even one month earlier the number of deaths and adverse events outnumbers the Pfizer jab significantly.
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter"><img alt="" src="https://i2.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/image-33.png?resize=639%2C195&ssl=1" /></figure>
</div>
But fast forward one month and there have been another 264 deaths as a result of the AstraZeneca vaccine with the total now standing at 685 as of the 21st April 2021. But the number of adverse reactions has increased by 196,163, now standing at a total of 573,650. That’s 284.7% more adverse reactions occurring due to the Oxford jab compared to the Pfizer jab when it should only be 44% if it was in line with the statistical norm.
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img alt="" class="wp-image-6445" data-attachment-id="6445" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-description="" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="image-14" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-14.png?fit=639%2C227&ssl=1" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-14.png?fit=300%2C106&ssl=1" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-14.png?fit=868%2C308&ssl=1" data-orig-size="868,308" data-permalink="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/01/shocking-u-k-government-release-13th-report-on-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-vaccines/image-14-6/" data-recalc-dims="1" height="227" loading="lazy" sizes="(max-width: 639px) 100vw, 639px" src="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-14.png?resize=639%2C227&ssl=1" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-14.png?w=868&ssl=1 868w, https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-14.png?resize=300%2C106&ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/image-14.png?resize=768%2C273&ssl=1 768w" width="639" /></figure>
</div>
The overall number of deaths due to both jabs now stands at 1103. But there have also been 2 deaths recorded as adverse reactions to the Moderna vaccine and 13 deaths where the brand of vaccine was not specified, meaning the grand total of unnecessary deaths now stands at 1118. None of these vaccines are proving to be safe but the data clearly shows there is a frightening problem with the AstraZeneca vaccine and it’s roll-out in the United Kingdom must be ceased immediately.
Please share this information everywhere, the only way to stop more deaths and serious debilitating conditions from occurring is by making a noise. We’ve done the hard work for you, it’s now on you to do something about it.
<div class="wp-block-group" readability="4.7013855709508">
<div class="wp-block-group__inner-container" readability="7.0520783564262">
<hr class="wp-block-separator" />
We urgently need your help! 
Censorship by Google and Social media caused 
support in our April Fundraising Campaign to drop 
dramatically so we have <a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/01/bank-holiday-weekend-fundraising-campaign-we-need-your-help/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">extended it into the 
Bank Holiday Weekend</a> in the hope that you, 
our readers, can help us to hit our target 
which will allow us to keep bringing you 
the facts the mainstream refuse to… 
<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=864RBRS7GH9LA" target="_blank">Please click the red button to donate via PayPal</a> 
<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/donate-today/" target="_blank">Hate PayPal? Then please click the ‘Donate Now’ button to donate by card</a>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter"><a href="https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=864RBRS7GH9LA"><img alt="The Anatomy of a Perfect Call to Action & Why they are Critical for Site Conversions - Inbound Now - November 5, 2013" src="https://i2.wp.com/www.inboundnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/call-to-action.jpg?resize=173%2C138&ssl=1" /></a></figure>
</div>
<hr class="wp-block-separator" />
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel">
<div class="coblocks-slick pb-8" data-slick='{"slidesToScroll":1,"arrow":true,"slidesToShow":3,"infinite":true,"adaptiveHeight":false,"draggable":true,"responsive":[{"breakpoint":1024,"settings":{"slidesToShow":3}},{"breakpoint":600,"settings":{"slidesToShow":2}},{"breakpoint":480,"settings":{"slidesToShow":1}}]}'>
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__item" readability="13.661016949153">
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__content" readability="14.101694915254"><time datetime="2021-05-01T19:46:30+01:00" class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__date">May 1, 2021</time><a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/01/doctors-around-the-world-unite-to-call-the-covid-vaccines-unnecessary-ineffective-and-unsafe/" alt="Doctors around the world unite to call the Covid Vaccines “Unnecessary, Ineffective and Unsafe”">Doctors around the world unite to call the Covid Vaccines “Unnecessary, Ineffective and Unsafe”</a>
DOCTORS from around the world have urged the public not to take …
</div>
</div>
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__item">
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__content"><time datetime="2021-05-01T13:28:25+01:00" class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__date">May 1, 2021</time><a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/01/video-tool-station-employee-verbally-assaults-disabled-customer-because-they-are-not-wearing-a-face-mask/" alt="VIDEO – Tool Station Employee verbally assaults Disabled Customer because they are not wearing a Face Mask">VIDEO – Tool Station Employee verbally assaults Disabled Customer because they are not wearing a Face Mask</a>
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__excerpt"><a href="https://youtu.be/J8KKkrKYGHg" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/J8KKkrKYGHg</a></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__item" readability="13.90206185567">
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__content" readability="14.350515463918"><time datetime="2021-05-01T13:08:55+01:00" class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__date">May 1, 2021</time><a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/01/an-interview-with-dr-mike-yeadon-vaccine-passports-are-a-gateway-to-mass-killing-in-the-billions/" alt="An Interview with Dr Mike Yeadon – “Vaccine Passports are a gateway to mass killing, in the billions”">An Interview with Dr Mike Yeadon – “Vaccine Passports are a gateway to mass killing, in the billions”</a>
DR MIKE YEADON has described how creating lethal pathogens that can kill …
</div>
</div>
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__item" readability="16.692307692308">
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__content" readability="17.230769230769"><time datetime="2021-05-01T12:04:17+01:00" class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__date">May 1, 2021</time><a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/01/bank-holiday-weekend-fundraising-campaign-we-need-your-help/" alt="Bank Holiday Weekend Fundraising Campaign – We need your help…">Bank Holiday Weekend Fundraising Campaign – We need your help…</a>
We can’t believe how much support you have shown us since we …
</div>
</div>
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__item" readability="17.496932515337">
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__content" readability="18.061349693252"><time datetime="2021-04-30T11:10:44+01:00" class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__date">April 30, 2021</time><a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/30/young-pastor-dies-after-taking-and-promoting-moderna-covid-19-vaccine/" alt="Young Pastor DIES After Taking, and Promoting, Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine">Young Pastor DIES After Taking, and Promoting, Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine</a>
Source: Facebook A pastor who preached the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines …
</div>
</div>
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__item" readability="12.567567567568">
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__content" readability="12.972972972973"><time datetime="2021-04-29T21:49:24+01:00" class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__date">April 29, 2021</time><a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/29/there-is-no-scientific-foundation-to-the-concept-of-vaccine-passports-according-to-huge-group-of-doctors-from-around-the-world/" alt="“There is no scientific foundation to the concept of Vaccine Passports” according to huge group of Doctors from around the world">“There is no scientific foundation to the concept of Vaccine Passports” according to huge group of Doctors from around the world</a>
A GROUP of doctors say natural immunity to coronavirus infection is long …
</div>
</div>
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__item" readability="12.280193236715">
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__content" readability="12.676328502415"><time datetime="2021-04-29T20:36:26+01:00" class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__date">April 29, 2021</time><a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/29/shocking-rise-in-expectant-mothers-whove-lost-their-baby-after-having-the-covid-vaccine/" alt="Hancock has blood on his hands – Shocking rise in expectant mothers who’ve lost their baby after having the Covid Vaccine">Hancock has blood on his hands – Shocking rise in expectant mothers who’ve lost their baby after having the Covid Vaccine</a>
A tragic milestone has been surpassed as the effects of the mass …
</div>
</div>
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__item" readability="12.640776699029">
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__content" readability="13.04854368932"><time datetime="2021-04-27T21:04:11+01:00" class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__date">April 27, 2021</time><a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/27/think-restrictions-will-end-21st-june-then-why-are-covid-marshals-being-recruited-by-the-uk-gov-to-start-1st-july/" alt="Think restrictions will end 21st June? Then why are “Covid Marshals” being recruited by the UK Gov. to start 1st July?">Think restrictions will end 21st June? Then why are “Covid Marshals” being recruited by the UK Gov. to start 1st July?</a>
On Saturday the 24th April 2021 up to one million people descended …
</div>
</div>
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__item" readability="15.224852071006">
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__content" readability="15.715976331361"><time datetime="2021-04-27T20:00:39+01:00" class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__date">April 27, 2021</time><a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/27/scientific-study-shows-the-pfizer-vaccine-puts-people-at-higher-risk-of-catching-covid/" alt="Scientific Study shows the Pfizer Vaccine puts people at higher risk of catching Covid">Scientific Study shows the Pfizer Vaccine puts people at higher risk of catching Covid</a>
A scientific study carried out in Israel has found that those who …
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<h3 class="jp-relatedposts-headline">Related</h3>
 
 
source <a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/01/shocking-u-k-government-release-13th-report-on-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-vaccines/">https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/01/shocking-u-k-government-release-13th-report-on-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-vaccines/</a>

revolution SHOCKING! – U.K. Government release 13th report on Adverse Reactions to the Covid Vaccines

The number 13 is viewed as unlucky by many, and after reading the UK Governments 13th update on adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines, ...

The J&J vaccine isn’t causing nausea and fainting, anxiety is

<div><img class="ff-og-image-inserted" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/YZY9LauPSPAQU5MhR7yFGMgpzgQ=/0x310:4325x2574/fit-in/1200x630/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22484579/1232604888.jpg" /></div>
A new <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7018e3.htm?s_cid=mm7018e3_w">report</a> from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that anxiety is to blame for a series of adverse effects from the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, rather than the shot itself.
From April 7 to 9, the CDC received reports of “clusters of anxiety-related events” after patients received the J&J vaccine, including hyperventilation, low blood pressure, headaches, difficulty breathing, lightheadedness, nausea, and fainting, among others, at five mass vaccination sites.
At four of those sites, administrators temporarily suspended offering coronavirus vaccines due to the high relative frequency of patients fainting — 8.2 people per 100,000, according to the CDC. For comparison, 0.05 people per 100,000 faint after receiving an influenza vaccine.
After conducting interviews with the 64 patients (out of 8,624) who displayed those symptoms, the CDC concluded that none of the cases met their definition of serious side effects, and the majority were resolved within 15 minutes. The researchers attributed the symptoms to anxiety rather than any discrepancies between the J&J vaccine and its Pfizer and Moderna counterparts.
In fact, the main difference between Johnson & Johnson — also known as the Janssen vaccine — and the other vaccines is that it only requires one dose, which the CDC hypothesized could be the source of increased anxiety around it.
“Because the Janssen COVID-19 vaccine is administered as a single dose, this vaccine might be a more attractive option for persons who have needle aversion,” the report said. “Therefore, it is possible that some persons seeking Janssen COVID-19 vaccination could be more highly predisposed to anxiety-related events after being vaccinated.”
Fainting events were mostly highly concentrated among the youngest eligible group — those aged 18 to 29. The report found that to be expected, considering adolescents have the highest rates of dizziness and fainting after other vaccines.
The CDC recommended vaccine administrators observe patients for at least 15 minutes after injection, in order to monitor them for anxiety-related effects.
The adverse effects described in the study are unrelated to the <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/30/health/cdc-johnson-and-johnson-vaccine-reactions-mmwr-study/index.html">17 cases of patients developing blood clots</a>, which led to a nationwide pause of the J&J vaccine’s usage in mid-April. The CDC found those instances to be extremely rare, and, along with the FDA, <a href="https://www.vox.com/22399353/johnson-covid-19-vaccine-pause-cdc-fda-blood-clots-cvst">lifted the pause</a> after 10 days. The vaccine now carries a warning for women under 50 regarding the risk of developing a blood clot.
The US vaccination campaign recently hit a milestone, as <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/30/us/politics/us-100-million-vaccinated.html">over 100 million people</a> are fully vaccinated, representing a near doubling since the end of March. And while the case count is dropping in the US, with the daily average at its <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/covid-cases-dropping/2021/04/30/0f0bb988-a845-11eb-bca5-048b2759a489_story.html">lowest total since mid-October</a>, global virus cases reached a <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/05/01/world/virus-cases-world-peak.html">new peak last week</a>, per the New York Times.
Much of the surge is being driven by a second wave in India, which now accounts for over 40 percent of the world’s new cases, according to <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/05/01/world/virus-cases-world-peak.html">the Times</a>. As <a href="https://www.vox.com/world/22403722/india-covid-19-vaccine-variant-cases-coronavirus">Jen Kirby and Umair Irfam reported for Vox</a>, Indian hospitals desperately need oxygen, ventilators, beds, and vaccines, with less than 2 percent of the country fully vaccinated.
The Biden administration has promised to send supplies, including raw materials for vaccine manufacturing, though some experts have called for intellectual property rules to be waived for coronavirus vaccines so that India, a global manufacturing leader, can catch up. The administration is <a href="https://www.vox.com/world/22403722/india-covid-19-vaccine-variant-cases-coronavirus">considering that option</a>, but in the meantime, the US will <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/30/politics/us-india-travel-restrictions/index.html">impose restrictions on travel</a> from India beginning Tuesday.
In a <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/30/politics/us-india-travel-restrictions/index.html">statement to CNN</a>, White House press secretary Jen Psaki said the high case count in India, as well as potential new variants, drove the creation of the policy. Foreign nationals who have been in India over the past 14 days will be temporarily barred from entering the United States. The rule will not apply to American citizens, permanent residents, and humanitarian workers.
 
 
source <a href="https://www.vox.com/2021/5/1/22414464/johnson-johnson-anxiety-side-effects-cdc-report">https://www.vox.com/2021/5/1/22414464/johnson-johnson-anxiety-side-effects-cdc-report</a>

vox The J&J vaccine isn’t causing nausea and fainting, anxiety is

A new report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that anxiety is to blame for a series of adverse effects from the J...

Mysterious Havana syndrome attacks are now documented in the US

<div><img class="ff-og-image-inserted" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/PFHb77jGCIh_92uQt0pQjZf2PRg=/0x0:4269x2235/fit-in/1200x630/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22484127/1232306860.jpg" /></div>
Leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee confirmed cases of the mysterious “Havana syndrome” — instances of neurological harm to US personnel from direct energy attacks — are on the rise, in a Friday hearing. Over the past two years, two attacks have occurred in the US — including one in close proximity to the White House.
Sens. Mark Warner (D-VA) and Marco Rubio (R-FL), the chair and vice chair of the committee, respectively, said in a statement that they plan to investigate the pattern of attacks and work with the CIA to identify who is behind them.
Havana syndrome refers to a series of invisible attacks against US personnel, first reported in 2016 in Havana, Cuba, when US diplomats began to experience neurological problems such as insomnia and vertigo. Since then, about 40 government officials, mostly employed by the CIA or State Department, have been attacked, reports <a href="https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/551205-senate-intel-vows-to-get-to-the-bottom-of-havana-syndrome-attacks?rl=1">the Hill’s Rebecca Beitsch</a>, with sometimes debilitating symptoms.
The majority of the attacks have been against officials stationed in other countries. But federal agencies are also investigating two neurological attacks that occurred on US soil, including one from November of last year that occurred alarmingly close to the White House, <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/29/politics/us-investigating-mysterious-directed-energy-attack-white-house/index.html">according to CNN</a>.
The other attack occurred in 2019, against a White House official in a Virginia suburb of Washington, DC, <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/29/politics/us-investigating-mysterious-directed-energy-attack-white-house/index.html">per CNN</a>.
Warner and Rubio committed to work with the <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/senate-confirms-burns-cia-director/2021/03/18/dcdce4ae-881f-11eb-bfdf-4d36dab83a6d_story.html">recently-confirmed CIA director</a>, William Burns, who they say has dedicated agency focus to the attacks, as well as to provide medical and financial support for victims.
“For nearly five years, we have been aware of reports of mysterious attacks on United States Government personnel in Havana, Cuba and around the world,” they said in <a href="https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?id=7D068456-8BBE-4FDF-9878-A40732593732">a statement</a>. “This pattern of attacking our fellow citizens serving our government appears to be increasing.”
“The Senate Intelligence Committee intends to get to the bottom of this,” the statement continued. “We have already held fact finding hearings on these debilitating attacks, many of which result in medically confirmed cases of Traumatic Brain Injury, and will do more.”
A US government <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/05/business/economy/havana-syndrome-microwave-attack.html?referringSource=articleShare">report</a> from the National Academy of Sciences on the attacks found commonalities among the victims, including nausea, headaches, dizziness, and loss of hearing, occasionally severe enough to force some into early retirement. The report found that directed radio frequency energy, a form of radiation that also includes microwaves, is behind the attacks, giving credence to the theory that a foreign entity is behind them.
Some in the intelligence community believe Russia is the culprit, which <a href="https://www.vox.com/2020/12/6/22156988/havana-syndrome-micowave-weapons-report">Vox’s Zeeshan Aleem explained in December</a>:
<blockquote>
The timeline of the incidents, the plausible explanation of microwave weapons, and the specific locations in which they occurred have raised questions of whether Russia is behind them.
In 2018, US intelligence officials <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latin-america/u-s-officials-suspect-russia-mystery-attacks-diplomats-cuba-china-n908141">described Russia</a> as the primary suspect behind what they believed to be attacks in Cuba and China. Russia has denied any involvement. NBC News <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/all/havana-syndrome-likely-caused-microwave-energy-government-study-finds-n1250094">reports</a> that, now or then, no conclusive intelligence has pointed to that explanation. However, the Times notes a number of Russia experts at the CIA believe that all evidence points to the country being behind the illnesses.
</blockquote>
In the past, both Russia and the former Soviet Union have used <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/05/business/economy/havana-syndrome-microwave-attack.html?referringSource=articleShare">microwave weaponry</a>, including against the US. In the 1970s and 1980s, the USSR <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/1979/05/30/archives/soviet-halts-microwaves-aimed-at-us-embassy.html">bombarded</a> the American embassy with microwave beams.
In his confirmation hearing, Burns addressed the attacks, saying he planned to review evidence. House Intelligence Chair Adam Schiff also committed to using his committee to continue to investigate, <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/30/politics/directed-energy-attacks-senate-intelligence/index.html">according to CNN</a>.
Additionally, <a href="https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/551205-senate-intel-vows-to-get-to-the-bottom-of-havana-syndrome-attacks?rl=1">the Hill reports</a>, the CIA has launched a task force to provide support to victims of past and future attacks.
The Senate Intelligence leaders also committed to holding perpetrators accountable, while acknowledging the current focus is on gathering more information about how the radiation technology works.
“Ultimately, we will identify those responsible for these attacks on American personnel and will hold them accountable,” the statement said.
 
 
source <a href="https://www.vox.com/2021/5/1/22414235/senate-intelligence-committee-havana-syndrome-warner-rubio">https://www.vox.com/2021/5/1/22414235/senate-intelligence-committee-havana-syndrome-warner-rubio</a>

vox Mysterious Havana syndrome attacks are now documented in the US

Leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee confirmed cases of the mysterious “Havana syndrome” — instances of neurological harm to US per...

Giuliani raid has Trumpworld on high alert

<div><img class="ff-og-image-inserted" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/xubYDUhv_Ss2FQwslgGDe_ZkgeU=/0x202:4550x2584/fit-in/1200x630/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22258968/1229918538.jpg" /></div>
Federal law enforcement is ramping up their investigation into Rudy Giuliani, leaving other allies of former President Donald Trump on alert.
Giuliani was formerly Trump’s personal lawyer, and became one of his most loyal defenders, becoming a central figure in Trump’s failed efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Now, he may be paying the price for that loyalty. On Wednesday, FBI agents, armed with search warrants, <a href="https://apnews.com/article/rudy-giuliani-trump-investigation-warrant-7a413e1bbb819cb52cd402d64a982185">raided his home and office</a> in Manhattan, seizing electronic devices.
Giuliani is currently the focus of an ongoing criminal probe from the US attorney’s office in Manhattan, centering on his business dealings in Ukraine and potential illegal activity involving his efforts to investigate Hunter Biden, President Joe Biden’s son. Wednesday’s raid confirms the seriousness of the investigation, which required Justice Department approval due to Giuliani’s status as a lawyer. The raid clarified the potential for Giuliani, and perhaps other Trump figures, to face federal charges.
Investigators are looking for evidence related to Giuliani’s role in the firing of Marie Yovanovitch, Trump’s former ambassador to Ukraine and a central figure in his first impeachment trial, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/29/nyregion/giuliani-yovanovitch-search-warrant-ukraine.html">according to the New York Times</a>. Yovanovitch was ousted in 2019 <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/us/politics/yovanovitch-trump-ukraine-ambassador.html">at the behest of Giuliani</a>, who felt she was standing in the way of his attempts to find damaging information on the Biden family.
That saga played out as a small part of the larger impeachment probe regarding Trump’s conduct with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Yovanovitch <a href="https://www.vox.com/2019/11/4/20948280/impeachment-transcripts-marie-yovanovitch">testified in 2019</a> that Giuliani was working with Ukraine’s former prosecutor general, Yuriy Lutsenko, asking him to open inquiries into political enemies including Hunter Biden — related to his time on the board of a Ukrainian energy company — and initiating a smear campaign against her when she attempted to follow protocol in arranging meetings between Ukrainian and American law enforcement officials.
Now, the Justice Department is investigating whether Giuliani’s conduct in that situation, and other events in Ukraine, were a violation of federal lobbying laws, according to the Times. Lobbying the US government at the behest of a foreign official without registering the activity with the Justice Department — a registration Giuliani never made — is a violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act.
Giuliani went on <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/media/rudy-giuliani-reacts-fbi-raid-apartment-hunter-biden-ukraine">Tucker Carlson’s Fox News show</a> Thursday night to dispute the claims against him.
“I never represented a Ukrainian national or official before the United States government,” he said. “I’ve declined it several times. I’ve had contracts in countries like Ukraine. In the contract is a clause that says I will not engage in lobbying or foreign representation. I don’t do it because I felt it would be too compromising.”
Giuliani also claimed to have hard drives from Hunter Biden’s laptop that the agents were uninterested in despite his pleas; said he could have destroyed any evidence at any time over the last two years in which he has known about the probe; and asserted that the Justice Department, under Biden, was making up a case against him. He called on the officials overseeing his investigation to be investigated themselves, likening the situation to “East Berlin before the wall fell.”
Robert Costello, Giuliani’s lawyer, said <a href="https://rudygiulianics.com/2021/04/28/statement-by-robert-j-costello-on-april-28-2021/">in a statement</a> that the investigation was evidence of a “double standard” in which the Justice Department will investigate prominent Trump supporters but will not open inquiries into Democrats such as Hunter Biden, whom he accused of “blatant,” though unsubstantiated, crimes.
Agents also obtained a warrant for the phone of Victoria Toensing, a lawyer who collaborated with Giuliani on efforts to investigate the Bidens in Ukraine. Toensing handed over her phone on Wednesday morning, <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/rudy-giulianis-new-york-apartment-searched-by-federal-investigators-11619628650">according to the Wall Street Journal</a>.
The <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/28/nyregion/rudy-giuliani-trump-ukraine-warrant.html">New York Times has reported</a> that in addition to Giuliani’s dealings regarding Yovanovitch, federal investigators are looking into his conversations with Lutsenko regarding a draft retainer for legal consulting services that eventually fell through. The investigation hinges on whether or not Giuliani was solely representing Trump in his dealings with Ukrainians, or if he was also working on behalf of Ukrainian officials and business associates’ interests.
The raid is a major escalation of the federal investigation into Giuliani, and represents a serious willingness by the Justice Department to look into the shadowy dealings of Trump figures. Considering Giuliani is a lawyer protected in his dealings with Trump by attorney-client privilege on some level, the fact that investigators obtained a warrant indicates the high-level nature of the investigation and the potential for consequences of the informal relationships between Trump figures. Giuliani’s work for Trump was often done informally — limiting the scope of what attorney-client privilege can protect.
Sources close to the former president <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/30/politics/giuliani-raid-donald-trump-inner-circle/index.html">told CNN</a> that the raid on Giuliani has left them uneasy about what else the Justice Department might be investigating.
Former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen, who pled guilty to charges of tax fraud, false statements to a bank, and campaign finance violations, flipped on his former boss in 2018. On CNN, he said he expected Giuliani to eventually do the same.
“Prior to Donald becoming president, Rudy didn’t like Donald and Donald didn’t like Rudy,” <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/30/politics/giuliani-raid-donald-trump-inner-circle/index.html">Cohen said on CNN</a>. “He certainly doesn’t want to follow my path down into a 36-month sentence.”
 
 
source <a href="https://www.vox.com/2021/5/1/22413964/rudy-giuliani-fbi-investigation-raid-ukraine">https://www.vox.com/2021/5/1/22413964/rudy-giuliani-fbi-investigation-raid-ukraine</a>

vox Giuliani raid has Trumpworld on high alert

Federal law enforcement is ramping up their investigation into Rudy Giuliani, leaving other allies of former President Donald Trump on aler...

An oral history of the Dawson crying GIF and its outsized legacy

<div><img class="ff-og-image-inserted" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/oPgQWJburDELGp9aGYqk2lqcf2M=/0x138:1920x1143/fit-in/1200x630/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22481543/Dawson.jpg" /></div>
You’ve seen the clip: James Van Der Beek dissolving into exquisitely artificial tears, his lustrous blond hair blowing in the creekside breeze as his face crumples like a discarded gum wrapper. It’s the reaction gif of absurd sorrow, of tragedy so overwrought as to be funny. It’s dawsoncrying.gif.
Crying Dawson ruled the internet comment sections of the late ’00s and early ’10s. It’s “on the Mount Rushmore of GIFs,” says TV critic Sarah D. Bunting. It was, for a while, the sight that greeted you if you navigated to a broken URL on the Huffington Post. Van Der Beek himself <a href="https://www.funnyordie.com/2011/1/3/17711242/vandermemes">recreated the GIF in 2011 for Funny or Die</a> and gave it a second life. Anyone who’s been even remotely online in the past decade or so knows it.
But Crying Dawson has a secret history — one that most people who saw the GIF would never know.
Dawson wept in the season three finale of the angsty teen soap Dawson’s Creek, one of the most ubiquitous shows of its era. The episode, “True Love,” aired on May 24, 2000, and his fateful tears were the culmination of a long and tortured story arc.
Dawson’s had been a pop cultural flashpoint from the time it debuted in 1998. It was all 15-year-olds speaking like thesauruses and the looming threat that someone might, at any moment, have sex. 10 Things I Hate About You would immortalize it as being the show where “those Dawson’s River kids” are always “climbing in and out of each other’s beds,” while its beautiful teen cast <a href="https://www.glamour.com/story/um-the-dawsons-creek-cast-star">frolicked through the pages of the J. Crew catalog</a> and its theme song raced across the Billboard charts. It was achingly of its moment.
By the time its third season began airing in the fall of 1999, to the extent that Dawson’s Creek had a mythology, it was the story of Dawson’s love affair with his best friend Joey, played by Katie Holmes. But Joey would soon fall for Dawson’s other best friend, Pacey (Joshua Jackson).
And Dawson would, ultimately, tell Joey to go to Pacey. And then he would cry and cry and cry, and pop culture history would be made.
But Dawson’s decision to send Joey to Pacey was not inevitable. The entire love triangle of Dawson, Joey, and Pacey was a glorified accident, the call of a group of young and raw writers, mostly in their 20s and mostly working their first TV jobs, as they tried desperately to create order out of chaos and shape one of the flagship shows of the young and hungry WB network. When their choice paid off, it would launch the careers of some of the most influential writers in television today.
And as the writers’ room was crafting Dawson’s tears, an entire ecosystem of pop culture observers was building up around it. The TV recap site Television Without Pity began as a Dawson’s Creek hate-watching site and grew from there to become a website that broke ground for the way we continue to talk about TV more than two decades later. And it was on the forums of Television Without Pity that the first and earliest GIFs of Dawson crying would pass from computer to computer.
To find out exactly how Dawson came to cry and why that moment has had such a long afterlife, I decided to talk with the writers who made him do it and with the TV recappers who would make the moment loop in GIF form across our screens forever after. Here’s our cast of recurring characters.
“True Love” was written by four writers — all still working in the TV industry — and I talked to each of them. The first, Greg Berlanti, was the showrunner for Dawson’s Creek when “True Love” aired. He would leave the series after its fourth season to create Everwood. Eventually, he would become the executive producer in charge of the TV shows of DC Comics, and he would serve as executive producer on Brothers & Sisters, Political Animals, Riverdale, Chilling Adventures of Sabrina, and You. In 2018, he directed Love, Simon.
The second, Tom Kapinos, would take over as Dawson’s Creek showrunner after Berlanti departed. He would go on to create Californication and Lucifer.
The third, Gina Fattore, would eventually become a co-executive producer on Dawson’s Creek and is remembered by fans for writing many of the pivotal Joey-Pacey love scenes. She would go on to write for Dare Me, Better Things, UnREAL, Masters of Sex, Parenthood, Californication, and Gilmore Girls.
And the fourth, Jeffrey Stepakoff, would also become a co-executive producer on Dawson’s Creek. Before he joined Dawson’s, he worked on shows like The Wonder Years, and afterward, he wrote and developed Disney’s Tarzan and Brother Bear. In 2007, he wrote Billion-Dollar Kiss: The Kiss That Saved Dawson’s Creek and Other Adventures in TV Writing. He’s currently the head of the Atlanta-based Georgia Film Academy, which provides training for Georgians to work in the entertainment arts industry.
Meanwhile, watching and recapping every episode of Dawson’s Creek were Television Without Pity cofounders Tara Ariano and Sarah D. Bunting. Their website would become the place where pop culture commenters like NPR’s Linda Holmes and Go Fug Yourself’s Jessica Morgan would cut their teeth as writers — and it would be where the rest of the internet, <a href="https://twitter.com/emilynussbaum/status/449215782128746496?lang=en">including Pulitzer-winning TV critic Emily Nussbaum</a>, learned how to talk about television.
But in 1998, all of that was just beginning. Here is the secret history of how a beloved but mediocre show almost fell apart, pulled itself together instead, and ended up accidentally creating contemporary pop culture in the process. Here is the story of dawsoncrying.gif.
<hr class="p-entry-hr" />
Dawson’s Creek premiered on January 20, 1998, and the fledgling WB promoted it hard. This new show, the network had decided, was going to be the show that defined the WB. It would create the network brand of beautiful angsty teenagers maybe having sex in beautiful nostalgic Americana landscapes.
Season one was not an unmitigated critical success — <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/1998/01/20/arts/television-review-young-handsome-and-clueless-in-peyton-place.html?searchResultPosition=3">a New York Times review</a> called Dawson’s Creek “a lesson in the dangers of overhype” — but it was a sensation. It was the new show that everyone had to talk about. Which meant, for one of the first times in TV history, it was the new show that everyone had to talk about on the internet.
Greg Berlanti, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: I was working on a movie idea with [Dawson’s Creek creator] Kevin Williamson. And in the midst of that, he said, “I want to show you this TV show I’m working on.” He popped in a VHS tape, and I watched the pilot of Dawson’s Creek.
Sarah D. Bunting, cofounder of Television Without Pity: My cofounder Tara Ariano and I met on a bulletin board about Beverly Hills 90210 in the mid-’90s and became bulletin board friends. We read these recaps, which were called wrap-ups, by Danny Drennan. And we then just started chatting offline.
And then Dawson’s Creek premiered.
Greg Berlanti, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: Initially, it seemed to me a little weird that the characters all spoke like adults. But over time, I sort of fell in love with the fact that they had this kind of heightened language that was their own, but their emotions and all of the things that they were going through still made them very much teenagers. That tension, you know, I really liked.
Tara Ariano, cofounder of Television Without Pity: None of the teens sounded like teens. They just all sounded like characters on a TV show. They were very hyperverbal. That became the charm of the show and what people liked about it; that it was this heightened reality. It wasn’t a vérité style.
That was annoying to me at the time, but ultimately, Dawson was a problem. Dawson was just such a pill.
Greg Berlanti, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: Kevin asked me to come and work on the second season of the show as a staff writer in television for the first time. And he had been so good to me and had really kick-started my entire career. And even though I wasn’t initially planning on working in TV, it sounded fun. So I did it.
Sarah D. Bunting, cofounder of Television Without Pity: We started writing these lengthy screeds on the bulletin boards and then someone suggested that we start our own wrap-up about Dawson’s Creek. Possibly so that we would shut the fuck up and let them go back to talking like normal people. But possibly because they thought it would be a good idea, which it turned out to be.
Tara Ariano, cofounder of Television Without Pity: My husband David T. Cole is a web designer, so he made us a site called the Dawson’s Wrap, and we started doing recaps. It did well enough in its first year that, after that, we went back and added a bunch of other shows. That became Mighty Big TV, and then that became Television Without Pity. And Dawson was our flagship show.
Greg Berlanti, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: I remember us all of us gathering around the computer to be like, “Oh, they’re writing about us on the internet. This must be nice!” And then realizing that, no, most of what people write about you on the internet is not very nice.
Sarah D. Bunting, cofounder of Television Without Pity: That was the idea: that Dawson’s Creek — we were very unfair to it, I’m sure — was trying to be something and failing. And it also seemed to be oblivious to what it actually did do well.
I give it credit: It learned. It developed an intelligence about itself. And crying Dawson is Exhibit A.
<hr class="p-entry-hr" />
As Dawson’s Creek ended its second season, series creator Kevin Williamson departed the show, along with most of the original writers’ room. With a skeleton staff, the new Dawson’s Creek struggled to find its voice. Showrunners cycled in and out of the writer’s room, and ratings plummeted. The TV show that the WB had built its brand around just two years earlier was now in danger of cancellation.
Greg Berlanti, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: At the end of season two, Kevin left, and I think every other writer on staff either left or was let go by the studio. So I was the only remaining writer from previous seasons that was on the staff at the top of season three.
Gina Fattore, Dawson’s Creek co-executive producer: It was indescribably weird in retrospect. The first day of season three in the writers’ room, only Greg Berlanti had ever written an episode of Dawson’s Creek before. And even he didn’t go all the way back to season one.
Tom Kapinos, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: I realized pretty early on that the things we were talking about in the room didn’t really bear any response to the show I had watched for two years. I remember getting this feeling like, this seems like we’re headed for some kind of a disaster. But I didn’t know what I was doing. I assumed this was just TV.
Greg Berlanti, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: We were having some ratings problems at the top of the season. I went off to make a movie, and I came back, and the network was making some changes to the folks that were above me, who I quite liked.
Tom Kapinos, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: We had this infamous femme fatale storyline, which we hit a wall with. And then we also hit a wall with this storyline where Pacey and Jen were going to embark on a casual fuck-buddy relationship. I guess somewhere around episode eight, the network flipped out.
Gina Fattore, Dawson’s Creek co-executive producer: Now that people don’t even make those long seasons of television so much anymore, I look back and I can see how there was this rhythm to the year, and it was exhausting. Especially that season. We had a production shutdown around Thanksgiving.
Tom Kapinos, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: We just had to change course. And I think Berlanti just sort of was like, “Okay, this is what the show is going to be.”
Greg Berlanti, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: The studio and the network came to me and said, “What would you do?”
Sarah D. Bunting, cofounder of Television Without Pity: It seemed as though, perhaps because Kevin Williamson had left, the rest of the team maybe felt a little bit freer to let the show become what it wanted to become. Which was not a show about Dawson.
Greg Berlanti, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: I had always felt like there was a real natural kind of love triangle, very much in the vein of the King Arthur tale: Arthur at the center and Lancelot and Guinevere all connecting romantically. In that story, they’re all good people and they’re all heroes. But the heart wants what it wants, and that can complicate things.
Gina Fattore, Dawson’s Creek co-executive producer: The Joey and Pacey chemistry that was there in season one obviously worked.
Sarah D. Bunting, cofounder of Television Without Pity: Joey and Pacey’s chemistry was, you know, actual chemistry, and not this sad two-wet-envelopes-lying-next-to-each-other thing that was happening with Dawson and Joey.
Tara Ariano, cofounder of Television Without Pity: Pacey was obviously the better character and always had been. And the two of those actors were like magic to watch.
Greg Berlanti, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: Because I had written so many episodes, the network and the studio and the cast wanted me to step up and run the show, rather than import a new person.
I was very hesitant at first. I tried to turn it down. But they said they’d help me.
I said I would do it if they let me have an actual gay kiss between two characters. That had never happened on network TV before. And the network agreed to that. So after that, I felt like it was worth it.
Gina Fattore, Dawson’s Creek co-executive producer: It says a lot about how much TV has changed that like we were like, “Okay, we’re gonna set up Joey and Pacey for like 12 episodes. And also we need to end a lot of the other storylines and stuff.” We didn’t really get there and activate that story till the 12th episode of the season.
Greg Berlanti, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: When we finally did start to reorient the season around that love triangle narrative, in the back half, we were just doing stuff on the fly. But it was really connecting with the audience.
Sarah D. Bunting, cofounder of Television Without Pity: The Joey-Pacey stuff was more interesting to recap.
Tara Ariano, cofounder of Television Without Pity: They were so much more fun to watch, too. That’s what you want in a teen drama, is that kind of spark, and it doesn’t happen that much.
Greg Berlanti, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: It was as atypical then as it is now for the ratings to grow for a show in season three or beyond. But the ratings started to grow again.
The actors were happy, and everybody was excited. I think we found what the show would be without Kevin there.
Gina Fattore, Dawson’s Creek co-executive producer: By the time you get to the final beat of a story, it should be rolling downhill. If you have set everything up correctly, it should be falling into place like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle.
Sarah D. Bunting, cofounder of Television Without Pity: It was, in a strange way, fanservice. Because that whole season, leading up to crying Dawson, you could kind of sense that Dawson was going to get a cartoon skillet in the face.
<hr class="p-entry-hr" />
With the Joey-Pacey-Dawson love triangle in place, the show approached its season three endgame: the moment when Dawson would have to tell Joey to go to Pacey. Fans anticipated Dawson’s comeuppance eagerly. But they would have to wait for the finale, “True Love,” to get what they wanted: the moment when Dawson would cry.
Dawson’s tears were funny out of context. But in context, they were incredibly satisfying. In the writers’ room, they were the culmination of an incredibly vexed and chaotic season of television. And on the boards of Television Without Pity, they were the payoff for three seasons of mounting hatred toward Dawson and everything he stood for.
Sarah D. Bunting, cofounder of Television Without Pity: At least for our corner of the internet, it wasn’t so much “Will they or won’t they?” It was, “When are they going to screw Dawson over so we can enjoy it?”
Tara Ariano, cofounder of Television Without Pity: He was not an appealing lead character. This is often a problem with shows where the lead’s name is in the title: They have to always make that person the hero because they’re not going to get them out of the show.
Jeffrey Stepakoff, Dawson’s Creek co-executive producer: John Wells used to say that writing television is like improv jazz. By the time we got to the end of the season, Greg, Tom, Gina, and me — I think we had really, really good improv jazz. We were making beautiful music in the room.
Gina Fattore, Dawson’s Creek co-executive producer: We wrote that episode, “True Love,” together as a group, Tom Kapinos and Jeff Stepakoff and Greg Berlanti and I. We traded off on scenes.
Tom Kapinos, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: I wrote the Dawson crying scene! Who knew back then?
I actually compared the script file to the finished product, and it’s pretty much word-for-word. I think Greg may have tweaked a little bit of the dialogue here and there. That just goes to show how that whole season was essentially crisis mode: We were writing this stuff really quickly.
Gina Fattore, Dawson’s Creek co-executive producer: I was the one who actually went to Wilmington [where the show was shot] with the script. I was there when they shot it. I was standing in Dawson’s backyard.
Greg Berlanti, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: Until you said that GIF came from the end of season three, I did not remember that. I’m not saying that we had Dawson cry a lot, but…
Gina Fattore, Dawson’s Creek co-executive producer: I don’t think we would have scripted a crying response. As a general rule, our scripts were light on stage directions. They were mostly just dialogue.
Tom Kapinos, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: It says, “Joey makes a decision, a simple enough gesture, and in that single second, Dawson’s reserve shatters. He can’t hold it together anymore.” There’s a little bit more talk, and he says, “Just go.” And then I write, “And he means it. Tears streaming down his face.” And then Joey backs away from the scene.
So yeah, it’s in there!
<div>
<div>[embedded content]</div>
</div>
<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20140329095842/http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/show/dawsons-creek/true-love/9/">Television Without Pity recap, 2000</a>: “Just go,” Dawson commands her. “Jo, go, I’m telling you, before I take it all back, all right. Just go! GO!” Joey turns, and as soon as she’s looking the other way, Dawson’s face crumples into the most hideously misguided man-crying scene since Luke Skywalker learned the truth about his father in The Empire Strikes Back: “Noooooooo! That’s not true! That’s impossible!” Joey runs through the wedding. Dawson collapses in a heap of moist sobbing goo on the dock.
Gina Fattore, Dawson’s Creek co-executive producer: Anytime you got to a season finale, there’s just that combination of exhaustion and excitement. And it was just such a hard year in so many ways.
I’ve often found that the emotions of your real life spill over into what you’re making. And I know for myself, I couldn’t believe that I had finally made it there. To this moment where I could just be standing in Dawson’s backyard, feeling a sense of relief that we had actually done it and made it to the end.
So I was thrilled when James cried! I felt like crying myself. I was like, “Okay, this is great.”
Tom Kapinos, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: I don’t know that I meant it, you know, with that intensity. Dawson was certainly an emotional character, but I didn’t think of him as someone who would break down crying like that.
Tara Ariano, cofounder of Television Without Pity: It’s just so overdone for what the moment is. It’s just like, this is a fucking teenager.
Tom Kapinos, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: You know, some people are ugly criers, and he was just an ugly crier. So it was just intense. I can see how it took on a life of its own.
Tara Ariano, cofounder of Television Without Pity: Sometimes, especially when it’s a show that you watch every week and you get to know the characters and the actors so well, when something like this happens, you see it coming. And it’s like, “Oh no. This is beyond the capability of what you’re asking this performer to do.”
Sarah D. Bunting, cofounder of Television Without Pity: That was absolutely the most unflattering iteration of Dawson’s hair and his character, that whole season. And that it culminates in this legitimately brave, I would say hideously ugly cry, where he has what appears to be a painted sea anemone attached to his head, masquerading as hair, and now it’s on the Mount Rushmore of GIFs? I mean, this poor man, truly.
Tara Ariano, cofounder of Television Without Pity: Like it was so funny. But also you just sort of felt bad for him, too. This is still a very young actor, and that’s one of his very first roles. Playing the pathos of this moment is clearly beyond him. It was like, “Oh yeah, this is not gonna be good for you. The fans are going to destroy you for this.”
Sarah D. Bunting, cofounder of Television Without Pity: GIFs were miserably hard to make back then. You needed a staff. You needed to be a smart-smartie. And they were already happening. The number of screenshots people took! Or people physically using a disposable camera to photograph it. Demian, one of our moderators at the time, was the one who with a hammer and tongs crafted the first GIF and uploaded it to the forums.
People recorded it. It was a thing. But as far as thinking that in 20 years you will say “crying Dawson” and my almost-80-year-old parents will know what that is? I don’t think I would’ve thought that.
<hr class="p-entry-hr" />
Dawson’s Creek went off the air in 2004, after six seasons of melodramatic love triangle configurations and reconfigurations. But the GIF of Dawson crying would go on much longer.
To get a grasp on the afterlife of the GIF, I spoke to some of the people who would help it live on. Filmmaker Lauren Palmigiano asked Van Der Beek to recreate the GIF <a href="https://www.funnyordie.com/2011/1/3/17711242/vandermemes%5D">for a Funny or Die meme in 2011</a> in a sketch that rocketed across the internet. And Nahnatchka Khan, the director of Always Be My Maybe and showrunner for Fresh Off the Boat, would draw on the legacy of the GIF when she had Van Der Beek parody himself in her cult-classic sitcom Don’t Trust the B — in Apartment 23.
Meanwhile, I asked internet culture reporters Miles Klee and EJ Dickson to weigh in on exactly why the Dawson Crying GIF endured so long and why it was probably one of the first GIFs many people ever saw.
Nahnatchka Khan, showrunner for Don’t Trust the B in Apartment 23: I feel like it was one of the first ones to go really viral? It’s just the perfect length: At first, you don’t think he’s going to go as far as he does and then he goes to the final face. It’s certainly one of the first GIFs I can remember seeing.
Miles Klee, internet culture writer: This GIF is really peaking in the five to 10 years after the show ended, especially around the 2009 to 2011 era, when Tumblr culture and some of those adjacent subcultures were very preoccupied with very recent nostalgia for things from high school or just a few years ago. That was the kind of peak for that scene. You’d use it to indicate any kind of histrionic emotion.
EJ Dickson, senior culture writer for Rolling Stone and former editor for the Daily Dot: It was probably one of the first GIFs I ever saw. My understanding is that use of this GIF was primarily taking place on Tumblr. I don’t know if GIFs were as integrated into our cultural lexicon then as they are today.
Lauren Palmigiano, filmmaker: I was a writer/director at Funny or Die. Often celebrities would be interested in doing something silly with us, and James came in for a meeting. Usually, the deal when someone comes in is the writers have all met beforehand and come up with ideas for this person, and they come into the room and we just start throwing ideas. James liked a bunch of ours, and he got the joke and was down to make fun of himself, so we ended up doing a full <a href="https://www.funnyordie.com/2011/1/4/17711248/van-der-week-behind-the-scenes">Van Der Week</a>.
Nahnatchka Khan, Don’t Trust the B in Apartment 23 showrunner: When we were looking to shoot the pilot for Don’t Trust the B in 2011, I knew I wanted Chloe [played by Krysten Ritter] to have a friend who was playing themselves. It felt like she would be friends with someone famous. Our casting director put together a small list of zeitgeist actors who were the right age, who were really funny actors, who would be down to play themselves.
James was at the top of the list. He did a bunch of Funny or Die videos where he made fun of himself. He seemed to have a great sense of humor.
So we sat down with him, and he was so game for everything. He completely got the joke.
Lauren Palmigiano, filmmaker: One of the pitches came from me. The crying meme was the most internet-y thing about James Van Der Beek, so I thought, why not make more? We thought, <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLHAoYtxrt8">let’s celebrate it, make more of them, add to it</a>. And it might be something that makes some noise on the internet. Which was always the goal at Funny or Die: to make something that will get people clicking.
And James had a really great sense of humor about it. He already knew about the meme. He said people had sent it to him before.
<div>
<div class="caption">James Van Der Beek makes Vandermemes for Funny Or Die in 2011</div>
</div>
I had actually been a Dawson’s Creek fan growing up. I don’t remember clocking his crying when I watched it on the show, but I do remember thinking the scene was heartbreaking. They were breaking up! It was awful. I did love the Pacey years, though.
Nahnatchka Khan, Don’t Trust the B in Apartment 23 showrunner: We talked about doing some reference to that GIF, but I don’t think it ever made it into the final shooting script. But he would have been down with it. It’s iconic! Even when we were shooting the show, back in 2012, it was known.
Miles Klee, internet culture writer: The popularity of that GIF maybe speaks to that feeling that the stuff you liked as a teen is pretty cringe when you think about it. You were maybe obsessed with it at that time, and you go back and you’re like, “Oh, lol, it’s these older people playing teens, written by older people who are pretending to know what teens do today.”
But because it is using these heightened teenager emotions, which are a real thing, it’s also timeless. You’re cringing at your past self but also recognizing why these things had such power over you.
EJ Dickson, senior culture writer for Rolling Stone: It’s the same as the Saved by the Bell <a href="https://www.theringer.com/tv/2020/11/24/21611425/saved-by-the-bell-jessies-song-im-so-excited-history-reboot">I’m So Excited</a> meme. It resonates in the same way. The cast was on this teen show that wasn’t taken seriously, they were attempting to do a dramatic scene, and the actors were extremely earnestly trying to communicate this tonal shift. James Van Der Beek clearly took it extremely seriously, and the earnestness just backfired so tremendously. And there’s nothing the internet loves more than failed earnestness.
Miles Klee, internet culture writer: I would compare this GIF to that moment on The Simpsons when <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUZiUORi3uQ">Lisa dumps Ralph Wiggums publicly in this really humiliating way</a>. And then Bart keeps replaying the moment, and he’s like, “You guys, look, if you slow it down, you can see the exact moment that his heart tears in half.”
<div>
<div>[embedded content]</div>
</div>
And when you see that GIF, you actually do have the visceral, physical feeling of your heart exploding, just torn asunder. That’s what the face is conveying. It’s just this total collapse.
We’ve all been there, so it’s truly relatable. And the relatability is the basis of all memes and internet culture, and anything that has that kind of staying power. So I think we all must identify with him in that moment.
<hr class="p-entry-hr" />
Crying Dawson is a legend. But that’s not the only legacy Dawson’s Creek left us with. The show that was almost canceled ended up breaking barriers of network television — and because of the plotline that culminated in Dawson’s tears, it lasted long enough to become the place where some of today’s most prolific TV writers learned how to make TV. Meanwhile, some of the biggest barriers the show broke have been all but forgotten, overshadowed by the memory of the melodrama and the tears.
Jeffrey Stepakoff, Dawson’s Creek co-executive producer: You can’t talk about this episode without also talking about the kiss Jack has with Ethan. You know that was the first time we had a gay kiss between two men on television, right?
<div>
<div>[embedded content]</div>
</div>
Greg Berlanti, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: That storytelling was really pivotal for me personally, because I didn’t come out until a couple of years before that. I’ve had a lot of LGBT people through the years talk to me about the importance of Jack’s character.
Jeffrey Stepakoff, Dawson’s Creek co-executive producer: One of the great legacies of the show, I think, would be the great people that came out of that writers’ room, and the impact that they have had on storytelling in our entertainment industry in this country.
Greg was very young. He was maybe 26 years old? It was a young room. I was probably the oldest person because I was in my mid-30s.
Greg Berlanti, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: I’m so glad I got to learn showrunning on another person’s show. By the time I did Everwood, I was able to start things off from a different place, and incorporate a lot of what I had learned.
Gina Fattore, Dawson’s Creek co-executive producer: I wrote seven episodes of season three. Normally if you were a beginning TV writer, you would write two.
Everything that you could encounter, production-wise, writing-wise, everything that could go wrong did. Dawson’s Creek was my film school. I learned so much.
Tom Kapinos, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: I came to the show as someone who was focused on dialogue. I was known as someone who could write clever dialogue and a good scene. But I didn’t really know how to tell a story, and I didn’t really know how to craft a moment.
Berlanti was great at that. That was probably what I took away the most of: It’s not just about trying to be clever all the time. It’s about crafting some kind of moment that the audience is going to remember, even when they forget the plots of things.
<hr class="p-entry-hr" />
Dawson’s Creek didn’t only launch the Greg Berlanti empire and multiple other major TV writers. It is also the show that would help define its own genre: the relatable teen soap opera.
Dawson’s Creek ended before the modern CW was launched in 2006. But it created the format of the show that would define the early years of the CW, and it started off the showrunner who would push the CW away from teen soaps and into comic book shows. So Dawson’s Creek is, in its way, as foundational to the branding of the new CW as it was to the WB before it.
Greg Berlanti, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: There’s a before and after to the way teenagers were written.
Sarah D. Bunting, cofounder of Television Without Pity: Once upon a time, in the ’70s, your teen content was like if John-boy got a story on The Waltons, or maybe Mary gets a story on Little House on the Prairie.
You start to see more teen-focused dramas in the ’80s. You have Saved by the Bell. And you have Beverly Hills, 90210, which, lord love it, because who else will? It started out as this Degrassi-like PSA-based thing and then it became a soap. But it was certainly not realistic. No one expected it to be realistic.
Jeffrey Stepakoff, Dawson’s Creek co-executive producer: I remember watching a show that I felt was transformative. I thought, “This is going to change everything.” It was My So-Called Life.
Sarah D. Bunting, cofounder of Television Without Pity: My So-Called Life airs in 1994. And it was like, “Oh, you can just do that. You can just tell teenage life like it happened. With people who look like regular people. Huh. Why isn’t everyone doing that, then?”
Gina Fattore, Dawson’s Creek co-executive producer: I felt very strongly that My So-Called Life would be the last teen show I would ever love.
Jeffrey Stepakoff, Dawson’s Creek co-executive producer: My So-Called Life was probably the first really great television series about a teen that featured an honest portrayal of her life and the lives of teens during this time. It was created by Winnie Holzman, and it was executive produced by Edward Zwick and Marshall Herskovitz, who had written Thirtysomething. Thirtysomething was one of the bridging shows that led to this era of character-driven storytelling that’s emerging in the late ’90s.
I worked on this series in 1998 called Hyperion Bay. It was informed by Melrose Place and informed by 90210, which were happening at the time. But it was also informed by the realistic, richer storytelling of Thirtysomething. That’s what we were trying to make for the WB.
Sarah D. Bunting, cofounder of Television Without Pity: I think Kevin Williamson was trying to split the difference between soapy teen fun times where everybody is wearing full makeup to bed, à la Beverly Hills, 90210, and this sometimes almost abrasively genuine experience of watching My So-Called Life. Which was not a perfect show but was absolutely like nothing we had ever seen before, to a breathtaking degree. Dawson’s was trying to split that difference.
And it didn’t exactly. All the teen dramas that came after it were able to do it a lot better. Or were able to look at Dawson’s Creek and be like, “This is where Dawson’s failed.”
Jeffrey Stepakoff, Dawson’s Creek co-executive producer: Dawson’s Creek is informed by My So-Called Life, and certainly informed by Felicity [which premiered in September 1998], and in some ways informed culturally by Buffy [which premiered 1997]. From my perspective, it was the best realization of this kind of character-driven storytelling, the kind of storytelling that I very much wanted to be doing at that time.
Greg Berlanti, Dawson’s Creek showrunner: And now, you can still hear it today. You can trace Dawson’s all the way through to what we’re doing now on Riverdale, whenever they have just a slightly heightened dialogue and tone.
Sarah D. Bunting, cofounder of Television Without Pity: So Dawson’s Creek’s legacy is probably as this sort of signpost on the road to perfecting stuff like Riverdale. Which again, not a perfect show. But it knows what it is, and it does that thing.
<hr class="p-entry-hr" />
Dawson’s Creek’s most lasting influence, however, is how it affected the the way we talk about television.
The show is part of the grammar with which popular culture speaks. We still talk about the show today, but more importantly, we talk about TV in the way we learned to talk about TV watching Dawson’s Creek.
Gina Fattore, Dawson’s Creek co-executive producer: The sweetest thing to me during quarantine was that, at a certain point, I discovered this podcast called Thirst Aid Kit, and <a href="https://thirstaidkitpodcast.tumblr.com/post/189235095990/thirst-aid-kit-s4e09-the-many-lives-of-joshua">there’s an episode about Joshua Jackson on Dawson’s Creek</a>. I like to go on long walks and check out new podcasts. So I’m listening to these two women just joyfully talking about what this meant to them, this story and especially that relationship between Joey and Pacey. I wrote a lot of scenes for them.
We were always writing from a place of character, and Joey was this like even before I got there. She was a hyperachieving girl who did extra-credit projects and got straight As and clearly wanted to go to college. And Pacey was not that person.
We don’t get to see those relationships all that much: a heterosexual relationship where the guy is supporting the woman in her ambitions and in her dreams. It was just what we were writing because it was right for the characters. And it was especially meaningful to me because I had been a very hyperachieving high school girl who did all the extra-credit projects. So it was like this vision of what would it be like to have a partner who really supported you enough to <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4vwP9W2h1k">buy you a wall</a>.
It was so joyful and moving that these women were talking about it 20 years later and what it meant to them.
Sarah D. Bunting, cofounder of Television Without Pity: My brother told me this story: He went to NYU, and one day he went into a computer lab to print something. There were two rows of eight or 10 monitors on each side, and he’s walking through to the back of the room to get to the printer. And one whole side of the room was reading Television Without Pity.
This would have been sometime around 1999, 2001. He was like, “Yeah, the Real World recap had just gone up.”
Tara Ariano, cofounder of Television Without Pity: We didn’t invent recaps. That was Danny Drennan, who founded Mediarama. We were inspired by him. But everyone is still doing it, and I feel like that’s why: Because we were doing it, and people liked them.
At the time we were doing it, they served an entertainment purpose as well as a practical purpose because there wasn’t streaming. And if you missed a show, you could read the recap and actually find out what happened. But now, people just like the fast analysis. And you can get it everywhere on the internet.
Sarah D. Bunting, cofounder of Television Without Pity: Dawson’s Creek was there right at the beginning of when people were doing that second-screen experience. You would watch the show, get up, go to your 40-pound desktop unit, dial into the internet, and have your thoughts.
It was present when that was becoming the way we as a culture consumed culture, that collective experience. So its legacy is, maybe, helping all of us to learn how to talk about TV.
<hr class="p-entry-hr" />
Dawson’s Creek was never a prestige show. It was never a logical fit for an internet show, either: It didn’t have the geek cred of a Buffy or an X-Files. But nonetheless, Dawson’s Creek emerged at the dawn of the prestige television era and the dawn of the internet TV message board, and it fundamentally, accidentally, shaped the discourse of both those cultures.
So there’s a reason that dawsoncrying.gif integrated itself so thoroughly into the language of the internet: So did the show on which it was born. Dawson’s Creek built the teen soap, the CW, and the way we talk about television — and Crying Dawson built the way we talk about everything else.
 
 
source <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/22364676/dawson-crying-gif-secret-history-dawsons-creek-legend">https://www.vox.com/culture/22364676/dawson-crying-gif-secret-history-dawsons-creek-legend</a>

vox An oral history of the Dawson crying GIF and its outsized legacy

You’ve seen the clip: James Van Der Beek dissolving into exquisitely artificial tears, his lustrous blond hair blowing in the creekside bre...