ANONYMOUS - OUR VOICE

Fearmongering goes nuclear: ‘We’re in brand-new pandemic’

<table><tbody><tr><td></td></tr><tr><td style="font-size: 6px; line-height: 10px; padding-left: 1px; padding-right: 1px;"></td></tr><tr><td><table cellpadding="3" class="btrcontent" style="-moz-border-radius: 4px; -webkit-border-radius: 4px; background-color: white; border-radius: 4px; border: 1px solid rgb(173, 173, 173); font: 13px Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 6px; padding: 8px;"><tbody><tr><td><div style="color: #999999; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 15px; text-align: left;">Apr 16th 2021, 11:38, by Dr. Joseph Mercola </div> <div style="color: #494949; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: justify;"> <h3>STORY AT-A-GLANCE</h3> <ul> <li>A "double-mutation" of SARS-CoV-2 is now said to target younger people. Some "experts" interviewed by mainstream media claim it should be viewed as a whole new virus, and a brand-new pandemic</li> <li>According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, clusters of positive cases among young people have been "connected to participation in youth sports and extracurricular activities." As a result, the CDC is now suggesting that such activities should be limited</li> <li>According to pediatrician and California state senator Dr. Richard Pan, people who criticize the COVID-19 vaccine ought to be labeled as domestic terrorists The terms "disinformation" and "misinformation" are inconsistently and hypocritically applied to excuse government incompetence and punish opposition</li> <li>Under the pretext of public health safety, we're told we need censorship, lockdowns, social distancing, mask wearing, new domestic terrorism laws and vaccine passports. We need none of those things in order to optimize public health. Those things, however, are necessary for the swift and easeful implementation of the Great Reset</li> </ul> In some areas of the world, including Florida, where I live, life has been fairly normal for almost a full year.  Restaurants opened last April, and people have flocked here from out of state and even from other countries to enjoy the fresh air and open businesses.  This clearly does not benefit the globalists' agenda, so, right on cue, fearmongering is ramping up another notch. The latest fear du jour is a "double-mutation" of SARS-CoV-2, said to target younger people. April 5, 2021, the New York Post1 reported the "double mutant" COVID-19 strain has been detected in California — a state that has experienced some of the longest and most restrictive pandemic measures in the U.S. At the time of that report, one case of the variant had been confirmed by a Stanford laboratory. Seven suspected cases were still being screened. <h2>Fear Du Jour: Vaccine-Evading Variants</h2> The double-mutation virus allegedly has two mutations previously found in two separate variants, which "help it latch onto cells," the New York Post writes.2 What they want you to fear now is that this new variant may be more resistant to vaccine antibodies. Younger people might also be more susceptible to it.3 According to the Observer,4 "COVID-19 variants could beat vaccines within a year if pharma policy doesn't change." In other words, they claim that unless sufficiently high numbers of the global population are vaccinated within nine to 12 months, the virus might mutate to evade first-generation vaccines, rendering them useless. Oklahoma has also confirmed the presence of variants — one that initially emerged in the U.K., and another that emerged in Brazil. According to The Oklahoman,5 "The faster people can get vaccinated, the slower the virus will spread and fewer people will be exposed to variant strains of the virus, said Dr. Dale Bratzler, the University of Oklahoma's chief COVID officer." In other words, they're putting everyone's feet to the fire. Hurry, hurry. Get the vaccine now. If you wait, it's going to be your fault that the vaccine fails and everyone dies. CNN6 also warns that, unless Americans "double down on safety measures until more people are vaccinated," more contagious variants will spread like wildfire. According to CNN, the variant known as B.1.1.7 "is changing the pandemic's playbook and could spell trouble for younger groups that haven't yet been vaccinated." <h2>'We're in a Brand-New Pandemic'</h2> Dr. Peter Hotez went so far as to state that B.1.1.7 should be thought of as a "brand-new virus" that is "acting differently from anything we've seen before."7 This "we're in a brand-new pandemic" narrative is also being parroted by Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota.8 Osterholm, however, claims that current vaccines are, in fact, effective against the B.1.1.7 variant. According to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, clusters of positive cases among young people have been "connected to participation in youth sports and extracurricular activities." As a result, the CDC is now suggesting that such activities should be limited, CNN reports.9 If you've got the creeping suspicion that we're about to face another round of lockdowns around the U.S., your spidey senses are probably working just fine. In a recent interview, Osterholm said:10 <blockquote>"There isn't a country in the world right now that has seen a big increase of this B117 that is not locking down. We're the exception. And so the bottom line message from all of these countries is, 'we could not control this virus until we did lock down.'</blockquote> <blockquote>We have to do a better job of helping the public understand that this is short term. All we're trying to do is get through this surge of cases that are going to occur over the next six to eight to 10 weeks because of this B117 variant."</blockquote> Where, oh where, have we heard that before? "It's going to be a short-term lockdown, just a couple of weeks to flatten the curve and ensure a functioning hospital system." Right. Those short-term measures ended up lasting many months in many places, even though hospitals were at no risk of being overrun. We now have a year's-worth of data showing that <a href="https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/01/27/more-evidence-proves-lockdowns-are-a-dangerous-lie.aspx">lockdowns simply do not work</a>. They cause far more harm than good. Yet they're trying to sell us the same non-solution using the same justification once more. As the old saying goes, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me." <h2>Dissenting Is Now Domestic Terrorism</h2> The problem we now face is that logical thinking is being vilified. According to pediatrician and California state senator Dr. Richard Pan, people who criticize the <a href="https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/03/25/covid-vaccine-morally-compromised.aspx">COVID-19 vaccine</a> ought to be labeled as domestic terrorists. In an opinion piece in The Washington Post, he writes:11 <blockquote>"Vaccines don't stop viruses. Vaccinations do. This common public health saying means a vaccine does no good if we can't get it into people's arms … but the overall goal of vaccinating a large majority of the U.S. population may ultimately be hampered by the anti-vaccine movement unless steps are taken to limit its impact …</blockquote> <blockquote>[T]o poison public opinion against vaccinations, could result in countless American deaths. That is akin to domestic terrorism … Some anti-vaccine leaders' financial well-being depends on endangering everyone else's health and safety. Social media companies should not be complicit in this dangerous movement … Getting vaccinated is a patriotic act. So is speaking up to support public health efforts."</blockquote> With that manipulative and hostile diatribe against law-abiding citizens, Pan secures a lead role in the medical fascism directorate that is spreading faster than the virus. He even stresses that local and public health officials, not politicians, should be relied upon to lead us to safety. In other words, he's promoting iatrarchy — meaning government by physicians — which as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. points out has been catastrophic in every instance that it's been tried. In his foreword to my new book, "<a href="https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/04/12/technocracy-vs-democracy.aspx">The Truth About COVID-19</a>," Kennedy notes: <blockquote>"The medical profession has not proven itself an energetic defender of democratic institutions or civil rights. Virtually every doctor in Germany took lead roles in the Third Reich's project to eliminate mental defectives, homosexuals, handicapped citizens and Jews.</blockquote> <blockquote>So many hundreds of German physicians participated in Hitler's worst atrocities — including managing mass murder and unspeakable experiments at the death camps — that the allies had to stage separate "Medical Trials" at Nuremberg. Not a single prominent German doctor or medical association raised their voice in opposition to these projects.</blockquote> <blockquote>So it's unsurprising that, instead of demanding blue-ribbon safety science and encouraging honest, open and responsible debate on the science, the badly compromised and newly empowered government health officials charged with managing the COVID-19 pandemic response collaborated with mainstream and social media to shut down discussion on key public health and civil rights questions."</blockquote> <h2>War on 'Disinformation' Is Really War on Dissent</h2> Having a frank and open discussion about pros and cons, risks and benefits of vaccination or any other pandemic measure is more likely to result in optimal public health than shoving just one side of the argument down everyone's throat. But optimal public health is not what the technocratic, globalist elite are after. Their end goal is to manipulate the masses into obedience so that they can acquire even more of their assets. As noted by Ash Staub in his article12 "The War on Disinformation Is a War on Dissent," the terms "disinformation" and "misinformation" are simply used "to excuse incompetence and punish opposition." He provides a number of examples proving that "theories or facts that don't fit the official narrative, despite being true, are treated as misinformation or disinformation." I would add that this is particularly true when it comes to health information, seeing how it's virtually impossible to find a single remedy or strategy that works 100% for every single person. There are no absolute truths in medicine. It all depends. Many individual factors come into play. Staub continues: <blockquote>"Whereas misinformation merely refers to inaccurate or misleading information, the label of disinformation implies an intent to deceive. Both have served as the source of much consternation and hand-wringing from media figures and politicians alike …</blockquote> <blockquote>While our inability as a society to agree on basic facts is certainly a problem, what should be self-evident is that misinformation and disinformation naturally abound when there is very little trust in sense-making institutions.</blockquote> <blockquote>If the information sources that are deemed 'authoritative' are so often wrong or misleading, and inspire little <a href="https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2020/09/14/americans-views-of-government-low-trust-but-some-positive-performance-ratings/">public confidence</a>, is it any wonder that people turn to alternatives? Misinformation and disinformation are natural consequences of our public institutions' inconsistency and incompetence."</blockquote> <h2>Most Americans Think Government Officials Are Lying</h2> According to Staub, 69% of Americans "believe their government intentionally lies to them," and 61% "believe the news media deliberately ignores certain stories or information." These are record-low rates of confidence, and government and media would do well to take notice of the fact that censorship only erodes trust, it does not build it. The fact that they turn to censorship rather than trying to be more forthright suggests they are in fact lying and have no intention of stopping. Since they refuse to tell the truth, the only option they have is to silence counter-narratives in the hope that, over time, objections will die out for lack of support. The problem is, truth has an appeal of its own, and so, in what appears to be a desperate effort to maintain control, "disinformation" is now being called out as "dangerous," indeed a form of "domestic terrorism," because if people listen to "bad" information, they might make decisions that will harm them. Basically, they're saying that you're too stupid to think for yourself. You'll buy whatever you're sold, no questions asked, and so they have to make sure you're exposed only to information that will benefit you. Everyone on the planet ought to be insulted by censoring, because, ultimately, it's a sign that government and media have zero trust in your ability to make decisions for yourself. <blockquote>"Just last month, former NSA general counsel Glenn Gerstell <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tackling-disinformation-is-national-security-issue-says-former-nsa-general-counsel/">called for</a> an 'integrated disinformation center within the federal government' that would employ 'counterterrorism' tactics to combat disinformation.</blockquote> <blockquote>It's not exactly clear what these counterterrorism tactics would entail, but the idea that institutions that so often lie to the public should be able to decide what is and what is not 'disinformation,' with the help of a surveillance apparatus designed to combat terrorism, is truly unnerving," Staub writes.</blockquote> <blockquote>"When the only acceptable information is that approved by the ruling administration, there can be no meaningful check on state power. Consent for the establishment agenda can easily be manufactured, and opposition can simply be deemed 'disinformation' and treated as 'dangerous,' deserving of censorship and removal. With a silenced opposition, power can therefore be exercised with impunity."</blockquote> <h2>Understanding the Plan Robs Their Power</h2> In a nutshell, authoritarians are taking extreme steps to control the public discourse because they know we don't trust them. What's more, they also realize that if people understand the grand plan, their power over the people will be stripped away. The public can only be controlled as long as we don't understand what they're trying to accomplish. So, what are they trying to accomplish? As detailed in many previous articles, it boils down to the global implementation of a new economic system based on technocratic ideology, that will so radically transform and dehumanize society that they simply cannot "sell" it with honesty. The vast majority would be horrified and refuse to go along with it. Their only option is to sneak it in under the guise of something else. Right now, that something else is the so-called COVID-19 pandemic. Under the pretext of public health safety, we're told we need censorship, <a href="https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/03/24/global-lockdown.aspx">lockdowns</a>, <a href="https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/06/25/social-distancing.aspx">social distancing</a>, <a href="https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/02/17/mask-mandate-for-all.aspx">mask wearing</a>, new domestic terrorism laws and <a href="https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/04/06/vaccines-are-the-new-purity-test.aspx">vaccine passports</a>. We need none of those things in order to optimize public health. Those things, however, are necessary for the swift and easeful implementation of the Great Reset. <img class="aligncenter size-full" data-recalc-dims="1" height="800" loading="lazy" src="https://i0.wp.com/media.mercola.com/ImageServer/public/2020/November/technocracy-and-the-great-reset.jpg?resize=500%2C800&ssl=1" width="500" /> <h2>Supreme Court Justice Speaks Out Against Censorship</h2> Needless to say, without Big Tech monopolies aiding and abetting, the current level of censorship simply could not occur. The good news is, we may slowly be inching toward a solution. As noted by The Federalist,13 "Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas offered a roadmap to eliminating rampant social media censorship from online monopolies on Monday." They're referring to an April 5, 2021, ruling14 for writ of certiorari on the case of President Joe Biden v. Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, in which Thomas weighed in on the ability of social media giants to control free speech. The Federalist explains:15 <blockquote>"Thomas concurred in an opinion to send the case back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit with instructions to dismiss as moot, now that Biden is in the White House.</blockquote> <blockquote>The case, launched in August, questions whether the First Amendment strips government officials of their ability to block third-party accounts on Twitter if the personal account is used to conduct official business. The lower court ruled Trump violated the First Amendment when blocking users on the platform, which served as a public forum."</blockquote> However, while then-President Trump was found to have violated free speech rights by blocking certain Twitter followers, Twitter faced no repercussions when it deleted Trump's account in its entirety, thereby violating the First Amendment rights of 89 million people, which is the number of followers he had when the account was taken down. As noted by Thomas:16 <blockquote>"It seems rather odd to say that something is a government forum when a private company has unrestricted authority to do away with it. The disparity between Twitter's control and Mr. Trump's control is stark, to say the least."</blockquote> <h2>Immunity Without Corresponding Responsibility</h2> Thomas highlights the monopoly power of Big Tech, stressing that when a company has unilateral control over a public forum, it ceases to be a public forum. The solution, then, might be to turn them into public utilities, which aren't allowed to discriminate against any customer. <blockquote>"Today's digital platforms provide avenues for historically unprecedented amounts of speech, including speech by government actors. Also unprecedented, however, is the concentrated control of so much speech in the hands of a few private parties," Thomas writes.</blockquote> <blockquote>"We will soon have no choice but to address how our legal doctrines apply to highly concentrated, privately owned information infrastructure such as digital platforms … It changes nothing that these platforms are not the sole means for distributing speech or information.</blockquote> <blockquote>A person always could choose to avoid the toll bridge or train and instead swim the Charles River or hike the Oregon Trail. But in assessing whether a company exercises substantial market power, what matters is whether the alternatives are comparable. For many of today's digital platforms, nothing is.</blockquote> <blockquote>If the analogy between common carriers and digital platforms is correct, then an answer may arise for dissatisfied platform users who would appreciate not being blocked: laws that restrict the platform's right to exclude.</blockquote> <blockquote>When a platform's unilateral control is reduced, a government official's account begins to better resemble a 'government-controlled spac[e]' … This analysis may help explain the Second Circuit's intuition that part of Mr. Trump's Twitter account was a public forum.</blockquote> <blockquote>But that intuition has problems. First, if market power is a predicate for common carriers (as some scholars suggest), nothing in the record evaluates Twitter's market power. Second, and more problematic, neither the Second Circuit nor respondents have identified any regulation that restricts Twitter from removing an account that would otherwise be a 'government-controlled space.'</blockquote> <blockquote>Even if digital platforms are not close enough to common carriers, legislatures might still be able to treat digital platforms like places of public accommodation … '[I]t stands to reason that if Congress may demand that telephone companies operate as common carriers, it can ask the same of' digital platforms. Turner, 512 U. S., at 684 (opinion of O'Connor, J.).</blockquote> <blockquote>That is especially true because the space constraints on digital platforms are practically nonexistent (unlike on cable companies), so a regulation restricting a digital platform's right to exclude might not appreciably impede the platform from speaking …</blockquote> <blockquote>Yet Congress does not appear to have passed these kinds of regulations. To the contrary, it has given digital platforms 'immunity from certain types of suits' … with respect to content they distribute, 47 U. S. C. §230, but it has not imposed corresponding responsibilities, like nondiscrimination, that would matter here.</blockquote> <blockquote>None of this analysis means, however, that the First Amendment is irrelevant until a legislature imposes common carrier or public accommodation restrictions — only that the principal means for regulating digital platforms is through those methods."</blockquote> <h2>Thomas Confirms Illegality of Government-Sponsored Censorship</h2> Thomas makes another very important point in his statement. He points out that while private entities are "not ordinarily constrained by the First Amendment," they are indeed so constrained "if the government coerces or induces it to take action the government itself would not be permitted to do, such as censor expression of a lawful viewpoint." In other words, a private company has the right to decide what the kinds of speech it will allow and which it will not, BUT, if government officials demand that they censor an otherwise lawful viewpoint on their behalf, then that company is liable for having violated the First Amendment. <aside class="takeaway tamiddle">The government cannot accomplish through threats of adverse government action what the Constitution prohibits it from doing directly … Under this doctrine, plaintiffs might have colorable claims against a digital platform if it took adverse action against them in response to government threats. ~ Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas</aside>This is pertinent right now, as elected officials are getting ever more belligerent in their demands that social media platforms censor certain kinds of speech, such as "anti-vaccine" material. As detailed in "<a href="https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/04/05/freedom-of-speech-threatened-by-censorship-extremists.aspx">Free Speech Threatened by Censorship Extremists</a>," what they're doing is illegal, yet they're doing it anyway. As noted by Thomas: <blockquote>"The government cannot accomplish through threats of adverse government action what the Constitution prohibits it from doing directly … Under this doctrine, plaintiffs might have colorable claims against a digital platform if it took adverse action against them in response to government threats."</blockquote> <hr /> <hr /> <h2>'The Purge' by Big Tech targets conservatives, including us</h2> <h4>Just when we thought the Covid-19 lockdowns were ending and our ability to stay afloat was improving, censorship reared its ugly head.</h4> For the last few months, NOQ Report has appealed to our readers for assistance in staying afloat through Covid-19 lockdowns. The downturn in the economy has limited our ability to generate proper ad revenue just as our traffic was skyrocketing. We had our first sustained stretch of three months with over a million visitors in November, December, and January, but February saw a dip. It wasn't just the shortened month. We expected that. We also expected the continuation of dropping traffic from "woke" Big Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, but it has actually been much worse than anticipated. Our Twitter account was banned. One of our YouTube accounts was banned and another has been suspended. Facebook "fact-checks" everything we post. Spotify canceled us. Why? Because we believe in the truth prevailing, and that means we will continue to discuss "taboo" topics. The 2020 presidential election was stolen. You can't say that on Big Tech platforms without risking cancelation, but we'd rather get cancelled for telling the truth rather than staying around to repeat mainstream media's lies. They have been covering it up since before the election and they've convinced the vast majority of conservative news outlets that they will be harmed if they continue to discuss voter fraud. We refuse to back down. The truth is the truth. The lies associated with Covid-19 are only slightly more prevalent than the suppression of valid scientific information that runs counter to the prescribed narrative. We should be allowed to ask questions about the vaccines, for example, as there is ample evidence for concern. One does not have to be an "anti-vaxxer" in order to want answers about vaccines that are still considered experimental and that have a track record in a short period of time of having side-effects. These questions are not allowed on Big Tech which is just another reason we are getting cancelled. There are more topics that they refuse to allow. In turn, we refuse to stop discussing them. This is why we desperately need your help. The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our <a href="https://noqreport.givingfuel.com/noq-report">Giving Fuel page</a> makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can <a href="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=BJBTSXXH3MLUN&source=url">donate through PayPal</a> as well. We are on track to be short by about $5300 per month in order to maintain operations. The second way to help is to become a partner. We've strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn't seem necessary. Now, we're struggling to pay the bills. We had 5,657,724 sessions on our website from November, 2020, through February, 2021. Our intention is to elevate that to higher levels this year by focusing on a strategy that relies on free speech rather than being beholden to progressive Big Tech companies. During that four-month stretch, Twitter and Facebook accounted for about 20% of our traffic. We are actively working on operating as if that traffic is zero, replacing it with platforms that operate more freely such as Gab, Parler, and others. While we were never as dependent on Big Tech as most conservative sites, we'd like to be completely free from them. That doesn't mean we will block them, but we refuse to be beholden to companies that absolutely despise us simply because of our political ideology. We're heading in the right direction and we believe we're ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only "get in on the action" but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above. As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. <a href="https://noqreport.givingfuel.com/noq-report">Please help keep NOQ Report going</a>. Bitcoin: 32SeW2Ajn86g4dATWtWreABhEkiqxsKUGn <div class="emotesBoxDiv"></div> The post <a href="https://noqreport.com/2021/04/16/fearmongering-goes-nuclear-were-in-brand-new-pandemic/" rel="nofollow">Fearmongering goes nuclear: 'We're in brand-new pandemic'</a> appeared first on <a href="https://noqreport.com" rel="nofollow">NOQ Report - Conservative Christian News, Opinions, and Quotes</a>. <img alt="" height="1" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoqReport/~4/oyfwXwypmho" width="1" /> </div> </td></tr> </tbody></table> <img alt="" src="https://blogtrottr.com/spot/84lf/3/fVQy" /> </td> </tr> <tr><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

Fearmongering goes nuclear: ‘We’re in brand-new pandemic’

Apr 16th 2021, 11:38, by Dr. Joseph Mercola ...

Pfizer CEO Says Third Covid Vaccine Dose Likely Needed Within 12 Months

Despite gloating that the Pfizer vaccine is apparently <a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/16/pfizer-ceo-says-third-covid-vaccine-dose-likely-needed-within-12-months/%22We%20need%20to%20see%20what%20would%20be%20the%20sequence,%20and%20for%20how%20often%20we%20need%20to%20do%20that,%20that%20remains%20to%20be%20seen,%22%20Bourla%20told%20CNBC%20in%20an%20interview%20recorded%20on%20April%201.">94% effective</a>, CEO of the pharmaceutical giant, Albert Bourla, said on Thursday that the public will “likely” need a third dose of his company’s Covid-19 vaccine within a year of being fully vaccinated.
He also said that annual vaccinations against Covid may be required.
In an interview with CNBC, Bourla said: “We need to see what would be the sequence, and for how often we need to do that, that remains to be seen.
“A likely scenario is that there will be likely a need for a third dose, somewhere between six and 12 months and then from there, there will be an annual revaccination, but all of that needs to be confirmed,” he said, adding that variants will play a “key role.”
Bourla added that variants of coronavirus will play a “key role” in the need for a third dose and “annual revaccination.”
“It is extremely important to suppress the pool of people that can be susceptible to the virus.”
In February, Pfizer announced that studies showed that their vaccine had a <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9249917/Two-doses-Pfizers-vaccine-94-effective-blocking-Covid-Israel-study-finds.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">94% efficacy rate</a>, although a study published earlier this month stated <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/covid-vaccine-pfizer-biontech-91-percent-effective/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">just over 91%.</a>
Researchers state that the Pfizer jab is more effective against the virus after the second dose, however, they have stated that more data is required to determine whether protection lasts after six months.
On Thursday, David Kressler, the head of US President Biden’s Covid-19 response team, told a congressional committee that Americans should be prepared to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/booster-shots-may-be-needed-after-covid-19-vaccines-us-official-2021-04-15/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">receive coronavirus booster shots</a> as a precaution against variants of the virus.
Kressler told the House Coronavirus Subcommittee: “We don’t know everything at this moment.”
“We are studying the durability of the antibody response.
Kressler said that the antibody response from the vaccine seems strong, but that there is some waning of it along with the challenges that come with the virus variants.
“I think for planning purposes, planning purposes only, I think we should expect that we may have to boost.”
This announcement follows after Johnson and Johnson (J&J) CEO Alex Gorsky said in February that people may need to get a Covid vaccine annually, just like the seasonal flu shots.
Gorsky said: “Unfortunately, as [the virus] spreads it can also mutate, every time it mutates, it’s almost like another click of the dial so to speak where we can see another variant, another mutation that can have an impact on its ability to fend off antibodies or to have a different kind of response not only to a therapeutic but also to a vaccine.”
In recent days, the European rollout of the J&J vaccine <a href="https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-european-rollout-of-johnson-johnson-covid-jab-delayed-as-us-officials-investigate-blood-clots-12274320" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">has been halted</a> as health officials investigate many reports of blood clots following inoculation.
The J&J jab rollout was recently paused at a vaccination site in Georgia, USA, after <a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/11/jj-vaccine-suspended-at-georgia-vaccination-site-after-8-people-have-adverse-reactions/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">eight people experienced adverse reactions</a>, including dizziness and fainting.
Unfortunately, it seems as though many of our fears are becoming reality as the vaccination agenda continues to push for unnecessary inoculation, which ignores the thousands of <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/09/10th-report-adverse-reactions-covid-vaccines/" target="_blank">adverse reactions</a> and <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/14/cnn-legal-analyst-who-celebrated-vaccines-dies-after-receiving-pfizer-jab/" target="_blank">deaths</a> associated with the vaccines.
<div class="wp-block-group" readability="4.4363885088919">
<div class="wp-block-group__inner-container" readability="6.4081167350661">
<hr class="wp-block-separator" />
We urgently need your help! 
Censorship by Google and Social media has caused support 
in our <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/03/april-fundraising-campaign/" target="_blank">April Fundraising Campaign</a> to drop dramatically. 
This is affecting our ability to bring you more of the facts that 
the mainstream refuse to. Please consider supporting us so we 
can bring you more great investigative reports… 
<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=864RBRS7GH9LA" target="_blank">Please click the red button to donate via PayPal</a> 
<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/donate-today/" target="_blank">Hate PayPal? Then please click the ‘Donate Now’ button to donate by card</a>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter"><a href="https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=864RBRS7GH9LA"><img alt="The Anatomy of a Perfect Call to Action & Why they are Critical for Site Conversions - Inbound Now - November 5, 2013" src="https://i2.wp.com/www.inboundnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/call-to-action.jpg?resize=173%2C138&ssl=1" /></a></figure>
</div>
<hr class="wp-block-separator" />
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel">
<div class="coblocks-slick pb-8" data-slick='{"slidesToScroll":1,"arrow":true,"slidesToShow":3,"infinite":true,"adaptiveHeight":false,"draggable":true,"responsive":[{"breakpoint":1024,"settings":{"slidesToShow":3}},{"breakpoint":600,"settings":{"slidesToShow":2}},{"breakpoint":480,"settings":{"slidesToShow":1}}]}'>
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__item" readability="16.269503546099">
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__content" readability="16.794326241135"><time datetime="2021-04-15T16:03:29+01:00" class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__date">April 15, 2021</time><a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/15/care-home-nurse-35-dies-suddenly-after-having-the-pfizer-mrna-jab/" alt="Care home Nurse, 35, dies suddenly after having the Pfizer mRNA jab">Care home Nurse, 35, dies suddenly after having the Pfizer mRNA jab</a>
A care home nurse from Stockport has sadly died due to a …
</div>
</div>
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__item" readability="11.758620689655">
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__content" readability="12.137931034483"><time datetime="2021-04-15T13:18:38+01:00" class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__date">April 15, 2021</time><a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/15/doctor-sends-letter-demanding-to-know-if-it-is-medically-ethical-to-continue-covid-vaccine-rollout-due-to-severity-of-life-altering-side-effects/" alt="Doctor sends letter demanding to know if it is Medically Ethical to continue Covid Vaccine rollout due to severity of life altering side effects">Doctor sends letter demanding to know if it is Medically Ethical to continue Covid Vaccine rollout due to severity of life altering side effects</a>
A doctor in charge of the vaccine roll-out in his small-town community …
</div>
</div>
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__item" readability="15.272727272727">
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__content" readability="16"><time datetime="2021-04-14T22:29:02+01:00" class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__date">April 14, 2021</time><a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/14/fact-check-full-fact-say-the-covid-vaccines-are-not-experimental-theyre-lying/" alt="FACT CHECK: Full Fact say the Covid Vaccines are NOT experimental – they’re lying">FACT CHECK: Full Fact say the Covid Vaccines are NOT experimental – they’re lying</a>
The public needs to hear the truth, and that's why we're here. …
</div>
</div>
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__item" readability="13.490740740741">
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__content" readability="13.925925925926"><time datetime="2021-04-14T16:37:01+01:00" class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__date">April 14, 2021</time><a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/14/down-the-rabbit-hole-californian-company-harvesting-blood-of-kids-to-reinvigorate-the-elderly-at-8k-per-session/" alt="Down the Rabbit Hole – Californian Company harvesting blood of kids to “reinvigorate” the elderly at $8K per session">Down the Rabbit Hole – Californian Company harvesting blood of kids to “reinvigorate” the elderly at $8K per session</a>
You may remember the pizzagate theory from 2016 that claimed Hillary Clinton …
</div>
</div>
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__item" readability="16.946202531646">
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__content" readability="17.753164556962"><time datetime="2021-04-14T15:22:06+01:00" class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__date">April 14, 2021</time><a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/14/cnn-legal-analyst-who-celebrated-vaccines-dies-after-receiving-pfizer-jab/" alt="CNN Legal Analyst Who Celebrated Vaccines Dies After Receiving Pfizer Jab">CNN Legal Analyst Who Celebrated Vaccines Dies After Receiving Pfizer Jab</a>
CNN and MSNBC contributor Midwin Charles has passed away at age 47, …
</div>
</div>
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__item" readability="16.217821782178">
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__content" readability="16.990099009901"><time datetime="2021-04-14T11:41:54+01:00" class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__date">April 14, 2021</time><a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/14/theyve-lied-to-you-the-nhs-had-a-holiday-during-the-year-of-covid-19-and-we-can-prove-it/" alt="They’ve lied to you – The NHS had a holiday during the year of COVID-19 and we can prove it…">They’ve lied to you – The NHS had a holiday during the year of COVID-19 and we can prove it…</a>
Boris Johnson imposed dictatorial, authoritarian measures on the British people on the …
</div>
</div>
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__item" readability="12.531914893617">
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__content" readability="12.936170212766"><time datetime="2021-04-13T17:45:37+01:00" class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__date">April 13, 2021</time><a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/13/its-all-a-lie-investigation-of-ons-nhs-data-for-the-year-of-covid-19-uncovers-the-largest-lie-ever-told/" alt="IT’S ALL A LIE – Investigation of ONS & NHS data for the year of COVID-19 uncovers the largest lie ever told">IT’S ALL A LIE – Investigation of ONS & NHS data for the year of COVID-19 uncovers the largest lie ever told</a>
In March 2020 the order was given “to stay at home” as …
</div>
</div>
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__item" readability="11.201680672269">
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__content" readability="11.563025210084"><time datetime="2021-04-13T11:48:44+01:00" class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__date">April 13, 2021</time><a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/13/why-are-authorities-so-desperate-to-vaccinate-every-man-woman-and-child-hancock-van-tam-vallance-co-all-heavily-invested-in-vaccine-industry/" alt="Why are Authorities so desperate to vaccinate every man, woman, and child? – Hancock, Van Tam, Vallance & Co. all heavily invested in Vaccine Industry">Why are Authorities so desperate to vaccinate every man, woman, and child? – Hancock, Van Tam, Vallance & Co. all heavily invested in Vaccine Industry</a>
The UK Government is on a mission to vaccinate the entire population …
</div>
</div>
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__item" readability="14.189054726368">
<div class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__content" readability="14.646766169154"><time datetime="2021-04-12T21:18:35+01:00" class="wp-block-coblocks-post-carousel__date">April 12, 2021</time><a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/12/tragic-shocking-rise-in-number-of-women-reporting-loss-of-their-unborn-newborn-baby-due-to-covid-vaccines/" alt="Tragic & shocking rise in number of Women reporting loss of their unborn & newborn Baby due to Covid Vaccines">Tragic & shocking rise in number of Women reporting loss of their unborn & newborn Baby due to Covid Vaccines</a>
When the Pfizer / BioNTech and Oxford / AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccines were …
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<h3 class="jp-relatedposts-headline">Related</h3>
 
 
source <a href="https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/16/pfizer-ceo-says-third-covid-vaccine-dose-likely-needed-within-12-months/">https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/16/pfizer-ceo-says-third-covid-vaccine-dose-likely-needed-within-12-months/</a>

revolution Pfizer CEO Says Third Covid Vaccine Dose Likely Needed Within 12 Months

Despite gloating that the Pfizer vaccine is apparently 94% effective , CEO of the pharmaceutical giant, Albert Bourla, said on Thursday that...

Nearly Half of Brits Say They Will Struggle to Revert Back to Normal Life After Lockdown

<div><img class="ff-og-image-inserted" src="https://cdn.summit.news/2021/04/160421covid1.jpg" /></div>
During a House subcommittee hearing Thursday, Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio demanded answers from White House medical advisor Anthony Fauci to basic questions about COVID restrictions, but was told he was ‘making the matter personal’, that he was ‘ranting’, and to ‘shut his mouth’.
Jordan charged Fauci of flip flopping on restrictions such as masks and distancing, and demanded to know exactly when the mitigation measures would be put to bed.
“15 days to slow the spread turned into 1 year of lost liberty,” Jordan urged,  adding “What metrics, what measures, what has to happen before Americans get more freedoms back?”
Fauci responded “I don’t look at this as a liberty thing, Congressman Jordan. I look at this as a public health thing.”
Jordan interjected “well that’s obvious”, after having asserted that Americans’ liberties have been “assaulted” during the past year.
“Do you think that the Constitution is suspended during a virus, during a pandemic? It’s certainly not,” Jordan emphasised.
As Fauci spluttered that “this will end when infections are low,” Jordan again declared “Dr Fauci, over the past year Americans’ First Amendment rights have been completely attacked.”
<figure class="wp-block-embed-twitter wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter">
<div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper" readability="7.9830508474576">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true" readability="9.7570621468927">
Rep. Jordan (R-OH) demands Dr. Fauci give him a date for the end of COVID mitigation measures:
“15 days to slow the spread turned into 1 year of lost liberty.”
Fauci says: “I don’t look at this as a liberty thing, Congressman Jordan. I look at this as a public health thing.” <a href="https://t.co/Pgv2mEySeo">pic.twitter.com/Pgv2mEySeo</a>
— The Recount (@therecount) <a href="https://twitter.com/therecount/status/1382722011135361027?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 15, 2021</a></blockquote>
</div>
</figure>
When Fauci failed to give any time frame for the end of restrictions, Jordan asked “give us your best guess then”, to which Fauci responded “I just did”.
“Are we gonna be here two years from now wearing masks?” Jordan asked, to which Fauci arrogantly responded “You’re ranting again.”
“Here’s how it works, Dr. Fauci. I get to ask you the questions,” Jordan fired back, adding “You’re the highest paid official in the United States government, you’ve given us your opinion on baseball, on dating apps, on cruise ships, you told us zero masks, one mask, two masks, now back to one mask, I’m just asking you when is it gonna end?”
“You call it ranting, I call it standing up for the Constitution, which I take an oath to uphold,” Jordan passionately proclaimed.
Watch:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" readability="12.041958041958">
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH): “Are we gonna be here two years from now wearing masks …?”
Dr. Fauci: “You’re ranting again.”
Rep. Jordan: “Here’s how it works, Dr. Fauci. I get to ask you the questions.” <a href="https://t.co/7ufdQ65zG8">pic.twitter.com/7ufdQ65zG8</a>
— The Recount (@therecount) <a href="https://twitter.com/therecount/status/1382738615990620163?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 15, 2021</a>
</blockquote>
Fauci also told Jordan, “You’re making this a personal thing and it isn’t.”
“It’s not a personal thing,” Jordan shot back. 
“No, you are,” Fauci whined, adding “That is exactly what you’re doing.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" readability="11.514285714286">
“You’re making this a personal thing, and it isn’t … my recommendations are not a personal recommendation. It is based on the CDC guidance … we’re not talking about liberties. We’re talking about a pandemic that has killed 560,000 Americans” — Fauci to Jim Jordan <a href="https://t.co/Q0TzaaGlAG">pic.twitter.com/Q0TzaaGlAG</a>
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) <a href="https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1382744943614132230?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 15, 2021</a>
</blockquote>
When Jordan attempted to continue questioning Fauci beyond his allowed time, Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters yelled from across the room “You need to respect the chair and shut your mouth.”
<figure class="wp-block-embed-twitter wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter"></figure>
Jordan’s fiery in your face approach is certainly visually effective, but Americans still don’t have any answers from Fauci to basic questions about restrictions. Indeed, <a href="https://summit.news/2021/04/15/tucker-carlson-responds-to-fauci-labelling-his-basic-questions-crazy-conspiracy-theory/">as he told CNN</a>, he believes any such questions are part of “crazy conspiracy theory”.
 
 
source <a href="https://summit.news/2021/04/16/nearly-half-of-brits-say-they-will-struggle-to-revert-back-to-normal-life-after-lockdown/">https://summit.news/2021/04/16/nearly-half-of-brits-say-they-will-struggle-to-revert-back-to-normal-life-after-lockdown/</a>

revolution summit Nearly Half of Brits Say They Will Struggle to Revert Back to Normal Life After Lockdown

During a House subcommittee hearing Thursday, Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio demanded answers from White House medical advisor Anthony F...

BLM Protesters Tell ‘White Ally’: “You’re White, You Don’t Belong!”

The National Black Lives Matter organisation is threatening legal action against one of its own activists after he called for an independent investigation into how finances are being spent, following <a href="https://summit.news/2021/04/09/black-lives-matter-co-founder-buys-1-4-million-home-in-area-with-just-1-6-black-population/">revelations</a> concerning co-founder Patrisse Khan-Cullors’ <a href="https://summit.news/2021/04/13/black-journalist-suspended-from-twitter-for-criticising-blm-founders-property-spending-binge/">property spending binge</a>, and further <a href="https://dailycaller.com/2021/04/13/patrisse-cullors-reform-la-jails/">money raking activities</a>.
As we <a href="https://summit.news/2021/04/14/blm-leader-calls-for-investigation-into-co-founder-spending-millions-on-property-in-white-areas/">highlighted yesterday,</a> Hawk Newsome, who heads up a Black Lives Matter group in Greater New York City, made the call for an investigation, telling the New York Post “If you go around calling yourself a socialist, you have to ask how much of her own personal money is going to charitable causes.”
Newsome said “black firms and black accountants” should conduct an audit on BLM Global Network Foundation to “find out where the money is going.”
“It’s really sad because it makes people doubt the validity of the movement and overlook the fact that it’s the people that carry this movement,” Newsome added.
After <a href="https://summit.news/2021/04/14/blm-accusations-against-co-founder-part-of-tradition-of-terror-by-white-supremacists/">labelling the developments</a> a “false and dangerous story” being pushed by “right wing forces” and “white supremacists”, it has now emerged that BLM is attempting to silence other black activists who are speaking out.
<a href="https://dailycaller.com/2021/04/14/blm-cease-desist-letters-hawk-newsome/">The Daily Caller</a> sought comments from BLM, and the group claimed that Newsome “is not and has never been a part of the official Black Lives Matter organization, but continues to use BLM’s name even after sending him multiple cease and desist letters. Therefore, any mention of him as a leader is not factual.”
BLM’s communications arm further noted that “Only BLM chapters who adhere to BLM’s principles and code of ethics are permitted to use the BLM name.”
Responding to the comments, Newsome said “So the issue has become my affiliation and not the use of funds. Interesting.”
The Daily Caller report also notes that BLM does not own any rights to the name ‘Black Lives Matter’, that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office routinely rejects applications to trade mark the name, and that Newsome registered his own organization, Black Lives Matter Greater New York, as a business entity in <a href="https://cdn01.dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/blm-greater-new-york.jpg">December 2016.</a>
“This movement belongs to the people,” Newsome commented, adding “It is for the people and by the people. It is the people that take to the streets and march in the name of BLM. No one has ownership of that. It is the equivalent of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. claiming ownership of the civil rights movement.”
When The Daily Caller presented these facts to the BLM spokesperson, the group began back peddling, noting “We are saying [Newsome] is not affiliated with BLM Global Network Foundation,”
“There may be individuals who include the words ‘Black Lives Matter’ in their organizational names, but they are not affiliated with BLMGNF. Does that make sense?” the spokesperson added.
The case continues to evolve, but it is clear that grassroots activists are now questioning the validity of those at the top of the BLM pyramid.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: <a class="twitter-follow-button" href="https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet" data-show-count="false">Follow @PrisonPlanet</a>
——————————————————————————————————————— 
Brand new merch now available! Get it at <a href="https://www.pjwshop.com/">https://www.pjwshop.com/</a> <a href="https://www.pjwshop.com/"><img alt="PJW Shop" border="0" height="600" src="https://cdn.summit.news/2021/03/merch.jpg" width="348" /></a>
ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
We need you to sign up for our free newsletter <a href="https://summit.news/newsletter">here</a>.
Support our sponsor – <a href="https://bit.ly/TURBOFORCE">Turbo Force</a> – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Also, we urgently need your financial support <a href="https://www.subscribestar.com/paul-joseph-watson">here</a>. ———————————————————————————————————————
 
 
source <a href="https://summit.news/2021/04/16/blm-protesters-tell-white-ally-youre-white-you-dont-belong/">https://summit.news/2021/04/16/blm-protesters-tell-white-ally-youre-white-you-dont-belong/</a>

revolution summit BLM Protesters Tell ‘White Ally’: “You’re White, You Don’t Belong!”

The National Black Lives Matter organisation is threatening legal action against one of its own activists after he called for an independent...

Chelsea Clinton Demands Facebook Ban Tucker Carlson – Carlson Responds

Facebook is blocking links to a New York Post story that exposes Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrisse Khan-Cullors’ controversial recent home buying spree, preventing users from sharing the link publicly or via private message.
The Post article from April 10 is headlined <a href="https://nypost.com/2021/04/10/inside-blm-co-founder-patrisse-khan-cullors-real-estate-buying-binge/">‘Inside BLM co-founder Patrisse Khan-Cullors’ million-dollar real estate buying binge’</a> and reveals how Khan-Cullors, a self-described Marxist, recently purchased four high-end homes for a total of $3.2 million.
As we <a href="https://summit.news/2021/04/09/black-lives-matter-co-founder-buys-1-4-million-home-in-area-with-just-1-6-black-population/">previously highlighted</a>, one of the homes, a $1.4 million dollar property, is located in Topanga Canyon, California, where the black population is just 1.6 per cent.
Another of the homes, a “custom ranch” located in Georgia, is surrounded by “3.2 rural acres” and features a “private airplane hangar with a studio apartment above it” in addition to an indoor swimming pool.
After one BLM activist <a href="https://summit.news/2021/04/14/blm-leader-calls-for-investigation-into-co-founder-spending-millions-on-property-in-white-areas/">called for an investigation</a> into how finances were being used, other prominent figures within BLM <a href="https://summit.news/2021/04/15/blm-threatens-legal-action-against-one-of-their-own-activists-after-call-for-finances-investigation/">threatened legal action</a> against him.
Now Facebook is completely blocking users from posting a link to the original NY Post story in yet another brazen act of partisan censorship.
When attempting to post the link, the user is met with the message, “Your post couldn’t be shared, because this link goes against our Community Standards.”
<img alt="null" src="https://cdn.summit.news/2021/04/Capture.jpg" />
Users can’t even send the link via private message to their Facebook friends.
“Facebook will not allow you to post this NY Post story or even to message it to another person. (I just tested it),” tweeted Abigail Shrier.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true" readability="12.386292834891">
Facebook will not allow you to post this NY Post story or even to message it to another person. (I just tested it).
So Facebook is now effectively opening your mail and reading the contents for ideologically objectionable material.
Anyone worried?<a href="https://t.co/L2MqxnK7Ry">https://t.co/L2MqxnK7Ry</a>
— Abigail Shrier (@AbigailShrier) <a href="https://twitter.com/AbigailShrier/status/1382774842986954753?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 15, 2021</a>
</blockquote>
“So Facebook is now effectively opening your mail and reading the contents for ideologically objectionable material. Anyone worried?” she asked.
Twitter also initially forced commentator Jason Whitlock to <a href="https://summit.news/2021/04/13/black-journalist-suspended-from-twitter-for-criticising-blm-founders-property-spending-binge/">delete his tweet</a> about the buying spree, which featured a link to the Dirt real estate website, but the tweet was later restored.
Weeks before the presidential election, both Twitter and Facebook blocked the posting of links to a New York Post story about the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop, a move <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/oct/14/facebook-twitter-new-york-post-hunter-biden">described</a> as “an unprecedented step against a major news publication.”
Earlier today, Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe was also permanently suspended by Twitter following his CNN exposé.
But there’s no political censorship whatsoever, honest!
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: <a class="twitter-follow-button" href="https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet" data-show-count="false">Follow @PrisonPlanet</a>
———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at <a href="https://www.pjwshop.com/">https://www.pjwshop.com/</a>
<a href="https://www.pjwshop.com/"><img alt="PJW Shop" border="0" height="600" src="https://cdn.summit.news/2021/03/merch.jpg" width="348" /></a>
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter <a href="https://summit.news/newsletter">here</a>.
Support my sponsor – <a href="https://bit.ly/TURBOFORCE">Turbo Force</a> – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Also, I urgently need your financial support <a href="https://www.subscribestar.com/paul-joseph-watson">here</a>.
———————————————————————————————————————
 
 
source <a href="https://summit.news/2021/04/16/chelsea-clinton-demands-facebook-ban-tucker-carlson-carlson-responds/">https://summit.news/2021/04/16/chelsea-clinton-demands-facebook-ban-tucker-carlson-carlson-responds/</a>