ANONYMOUS - OUR VOICE

Muslim Imam And His Daughter Put Poisoned Needles In Food And Then Give It Out To Try And Kill Hungry Beggars

<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Beggarsgsdcewegh.jpg"><img alt="Beggarsgsdcewegh" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-102797" height="200" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Beggarsgsdcewegh-300x200.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Beggarsgsdcewegh-300x200.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Beggarsgsdcewegh.jpg 495w" width="300" /></a>In a sick and new form of cruelty disguised as charity, a Muslim Imam and his daughter were arrested after giving out food to the homeless, only they spiked the food with poisoned needles to try and kill the people they were giving the food to:<blockquote>A 50-year-old Muslim cleric, Mohammed Yusuf, and daughter, Salamat, 18, were on Tuesday arraigned at a Tinubu Magistrates’ Court, Lagos, for allegedly distributing poisoned “akara’’, a local snack, to beggars. The Yusufs, who are facing a two-count charge of conspiracy and attempted murder, were alleged to have inserted needles in the snack before giving them to beggars.The Prosecuting State Counsel, Barr. Ben Ekundayo, told the court that the defendants committed the offences on Aug. 5 at about 2 p.m. at Offin Street, Balogun, Lagos Island.He alleged that the man and his daughter carried out the act with intent to endanger the lives of the beggars.“The Muslim cleric sent his daughter to give the beggars, near the mosque, the bean-cakes, but when one of them (the beggars) opened the bean-cake, he found needles in the middle.“Other beggars were notified; one of them, who know the daughter and the school where she teaches, led them there and she was apprehended.“She also led them to her father,” Ekundayo said. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://dailypost.ng/2016/08/16/muslim-cleric-daughter-allegedly-distribute-poisonous-akara-beggars-lagos/">source</a>)</blockquote>That is just completely sick. However, it underscores another lesson which we have been saying for years, and that is that Muslims are not to be trusted because Islam is and inherently untrustworthy religion. It does not matter how "good" a person supposedly is, because Islam is an evil religion that was founded by a man who lived and evil life and is regarded a the highest example of morality for his followers.In this example of giving out poisoned food, ask yourself, "Would Muhammad have done something like this to his enemies?"The answer will tell you all you need to know.

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Muslim Imam And His Daughter Put Poisoned Needles In Food And Then Give It Out To Try And Kill Hungry Beggars

In a sick and new form of cruelty disguised as charity, a Muslim Imam and his daughter were arrested after giving out food to the homel...

The Catholic Church Has Always Been Against Islam And Will Always Be Against Islam And Nobody Can Ever Change That

<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/04889asdgasfdd.jpg"><img alt="04889asdgasfdd" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-102788" height="225" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/04889asdgasfdd-300x225.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/04889asdgasfdd-300x225.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/04889asdgasfdd.jpg 540w" width="300" /></a>King Sobieski of Poland sending the Pope a message about the Christian victory over the Muslims at ViennaRobert Spencer at Jihad Watch recently wrote an interesting piece about the status of the Catholic Church today and Islam. In his article, he alludes to his frustration with Church leadership about Islam and their even complicit actions in allowing Islam to spread its agenda unchecked:<blockquote>Msgr. Swetland has now helpfully supplied me with the remarks below, clarifying his position and supporting it with statements of various Popes and the Second Vatican Council. Msgr. Swetland contends that statements of recent Popes to the effect that Islam is a religion of peace fall into the category of teachings to which Catholics must give “religious assent,” as per the quotation below from the Second Vatican Council document Lumen Gentium.If Msgr. Swetland is correct, then I am, as he puts it, “a dissenter from the papal magisterium.” So also, then, would be millions of other Catholics, including Catholics from the Middle East who have borne the brunt of Muslim persecution of Christians and know what Islam teaches, such as the gentleman from Lebanon who phoned in to the Mariani Show during my discussion with Msgr. Swetland. If Msgr. Swetland is correct, then Catholics must affirm that Islam is a religion of peace as part and parcel of being Catholic, and the Catholic Church will be requiring that its faithful affirm the truth of what is an obvious and egregious falsehood, as I demonstrated <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/11/pope-francis-authentic-islam-and-the-proper-reading-of-the-koran-are-opposed-to-every-form-of-violen?doing_wp_cron=1471118106.6326971054077148437500" target="_blank">here</a> and in many other places.If Msgr. Swetland is correct, and it is Church teaching that all Catholics must accept that Islam is a religion of peace, then the Catholic hierarchy will have demonstrated that it does not have the authority or reliability in discerning and transmitting the truth that it claims to have; Papal claims to speak in the name of Christ will be eviscerated; and the Catholic Church as a whole exposed as a fraud. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/08/is-there-room-in-the-catholic-church-for-those-who-dont-believe-islam-is-a-religion-of-peace">source</a>)</blockquote>As a fellow Catholic, I can sympathize with his frustrations. There are many people in the Church today who are in support of Islam, including sadly, the current pope. That said, many of the problems one sees in the Church today came about following the "reforms" of Vatican II, that the Church's long-standing position on Islam has never changed, and it will be only a matter of time before the truth finally comes out again after being wrongly ignored by certain members of the hierarchy.For those who are not aware, the Vatican II council was a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/05/is-vatican-ii-completely-binding-on-catholics">non-binding council and the decisions that it made were equally non-binding</a>. In the words of even those who participated in the council, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ewtn.com/library/ANSWERS/VAT-2.HTM">they will say from their own words that the council was "pastoral, not dogmatic."</a> This is a critical distinction because it is the difference between discipline versus doctrine- a doctrine is a formal teaching that explains a divinely revealed truth. A discipline, however, is a man-man rule or recommendations, usually done for the sake of facilitating a particular teachings, preventing an abuse, or to accommodate to a specific set of challenges, but what makes is difference is because it is wholly man-made and acknowledged as so.<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/808893.jpg"><img alt="808893" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-102785" height="169" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/808893-300x169.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/808893-300x169.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/808893-768x432.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/808893.jpg 999w" width="300" /></a>Fun fact: Cardinal Carlo Martini, who was behind much of the radical "pastoral recommendations" that caused the wreckage from Vatican II (and again, all of which were non-binding and carried no theological weight whatsoever) <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.traditioninaction.org/ProgressivistDoc/A_163_MartiniI.html">was a Freemason and as such he was working as a traitor within the ranks of the Church</a>. However, it was not just him, as there were many more traitors and suspected masons, such as Cardinals Anibale Bugnini and Jean-Marie Villot.An example of doctrine and discipline is the teachings on the Eucharist versus the prohibition on married priests. The teachings on the Eucharist is a doctrine because it explains a dogma, which is that one must consume the body and blood of Jesus, per John 6, or else one does not have life within him. The understanding was, is, and always will be this means <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.therealpresence.org/eucharst/tes/a7.html">the literal body and blood as taught by all the great saints of the past</a>, and is critical to salvation,  but this has been taught consistently by all Christians up until the Protestant Revolution- <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://bfhu.wordpress.com/2011/05/13/martin-luther-on-the-real-presence/">even Martin Luther himself, the founder of the Revolution, emphasized that Christ was truly present in the Eucharist</a>, saying that is was so clear from Scripture and the writings of the saints that it could not be plausibly denied:<blockquote>Who, but the devil, has granted such license of wresting the words of the holy Scripture? Who ever read in the Scriptures, that my body is the same as thesign of my body? or, that is is the same as it signifies? What language in the world ever spoke so? It is only then the devil, that imposes upon us by these fanatical men. Not one of the Fathers of the Church, though so numerous, ever spoke as the Sacramentarians: not one of them ever said, It is only bread and wine; or, the body and blood of Christ is not there present.Surely, it is not credible, nor possible, since they often speak, and repeat their sentiments, that they should never (if they thought so) not so much as once, say, or let slip these words: It is bread only; or the body of Christ is not there, especially it being of great importance, that men should not be deceived. Certainly, in so many Fathers, and in so many writings, the negative might at least be found in one of them, had they thought the body and blood of Christ were not really present: but they are all of them unanimous.” (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://bfhu.wordpress.com/2011/05/13/martin-luther-on-the-real-presence/">source</a>)</blockquote>By comparison, the prohibition on married clergy is a discipline. In the West, it has been a standard practice since the Council of Elvira in 304, and has been a formal discipline since it was established so by Pope St. Gregory VII in 1059. The reasoning behind clerical celibacy was to prevent the formation of dynasties, simony, and more importantly, to prevent issues with inheritance in the case of children. However, this is a uniquely Western phenomenon, as Eastern Catholics as well as the Orthodox do allow for married priests in certain cases.This difference between doctrine and discipline, as well as the statement that Vatican II was not binding, should give us pause for another question- why is it then that Vatican II is spoke with such authority and taught as though it is binding? After all, if the documents were just pastoral statements and have no theological weight, why are they presented as having such?Now this is where things get interesting.Look to the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/2108-the-synod-on-the-family-and-the-fate-of-the-church">most recent scandal with the "synod on the family" that took place</a>. The synod, which many Catholics have described as a "sinod", is because of the scandalous nature of what happened, and that is how many of the leaders of the synod, almost entirely from Germany or Germanic countries (and all who happened to be very, very close personal associates of Pope Francis) were pushing for the Church to acknowledge homosexual unions. This was something which, as many bishops pointed out, not only could they not do because it is forbidden permanently, but was a direct contradiction to Church teachings, and even if they did do it, it would not be legal and Catholics would be required to disobey it. <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2015/10/squaring-circle-synods-most-likely.html">Therefore, what happened with the controversy was not actually to change teachings, since that would be impossible, but to give the impression that a change had taken place when it really did not.</a><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/cardinal-walter-kasper-006.jpg"><img alt="cardinal-walter-kasper-006" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-102770" height="180" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/cardinal-walter-kasper-006-300x180.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/cardinal-walter-kasper-006-300x180.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/cardinal-walter-kasper-006.jpg 460w" width="300" /></a>The heretical Cardinal Walter Kasper of Germany, close friend of Pope Francis, supporter of violating Church teaching on sodomy and divorce, and manipulator of the Synod of the Family.Think of the Catholic Faith as a trust fund. The deposit are the teachings given by Jesus, and the guarantor is God, who enjoined those teachings. The fund and its deposit of faith all belong to God, and no man can change them. As such, the Pope is simply a trustee- it is his responsibility to look after the good of the Faith and those who benefit from it (the faithful), and to make sure that it is being properly represented. However, he cannot add to or subtract from anything, since he does not have access to change this. The only malicious thing that he could do, if he really wanted to, is to lie about the contents of the deposit of Faith- this would not actually change what the Faith teaches, but it would give people an impression that things were different than they actually are. It's like a trick that a mean big brother would play on his little brother- he would tell him that he has something that does not actually belong to him, or that things are different that what they really are.<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/bishop-schneider-1.jpg"><img alt="bishop-schneider-1" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-102771" height="185" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/bishop-schneider-1-300x185.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/bishop-schneider-1-300x185.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/bishop-schneider-1-768x474.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/bishop-schneider-1.jpg 810w" width="300" /></a>Bishop Athanasius Schneider, a modern day hero and one of the few voices at the Synod on the Family who stood up to Kasper's heresies and Pope Francis' refusal to intervene in a clear moral wrong.This is not the first time this has happened. If you have any doubt about this, look into the entire scandal of distributing Communion in the hand. This practice was never permitted, and the only "exception" ever given was in extreme circumstances and was done at the insistence of certain disobedient (and Germanic) bishops. However, the practice soon took over the entire Church even thought it was not supposed to and is still wrong:<blockquote>The practice of receiving Holy Communion in the hand first began to spread in Catholic circles during the early 1960s, primarily in Holland. Shortly after Vatican II, due to the escalating abuses in certain non-English speaking countries (Holland, Belgium, France and Germany), Pope Paul VI took a survey of the world's bishops to ascertain their opinions on the subject. On May 28, 1969 the Congregation for Divine Worship issued Memoriale Domini, which concluded: "From the responses received, it is thus clear that by far the greater number of bishops feel that the present discipline [i.e., Holy Communion on the tongue] should not be changed at all, indeed that if it were changed, this would be offensive to the sensibility and spiritual appreciation of these bishops and of most of the faithful." After he had considered the observation and the counsel of the bishops, the Supreme Pontiff judged that the long-received manner of ministering Holy Communion to the faithful should not be changed. The Apostolic See then strongly urged bishops, priests and the laity to zealously observe this law out of concern for the common good of the Church.Despite the vote, in 1969 Pope Paul VI decided to strike a compromise with his disobedient bishops on the continent. Given “the gravity of the matter,” the pope would not authorize Communion in the hand. He was, however, open to bestowing an indult – an exception to the law – under certain conditions: first, an indult could not be given to a country in which Communion in the hand was not an already established practice; second, the bishops in countries where it was established must approve of the practice “by a secret vote and with a two-thirds majority.” Beyond this, the Holy See set down seven regulations concerning communion in the hand; failure to maintain these regulations could result in the loss of the indult. The first three regulations concerned: 1) respecting the laity who continue the traditional practice (of receiving kneeling and on the tongue), 2) maintaining the laity’s proper respect of the Eucharist, and 3) strengthening the laity’s faith in the real presence. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.newliturgicalmovement.org/2014/03/truth-about-communion-in-hand-while.html#.V7OAcfkrLIU">source</a>)</blockquote>Fast forward to today, and re-apply this to the situation with Islam vis-a-vis the traditional teachings of the Church concerning Islam.I have written a book- <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.amazon.com/Lions-Faith-Blesseds-Catholic-Struggle-ebook/dp/B017Z9NXIO">Lions of the Faith: Saints, Blesseds, and Heroes of the Catholic Faith in the Struggle with Islam</a>, where I have meticulously documented how the Catholic Church is inherently, irreconcilably,100% opposed to Islam and is in fact the greatest obstacle to Islam's global spread. I have written here how the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2016/05/01/the-popes-are-the-greatest-warriors-against-islam-in-world-history-and-they-will-lead-the-fight-to-destroy-the-muslim-heresy-in-the-last-days/">Popes of the Catholic Church are historically the greatest warriors against Islam</a>. I have written how the saints- the great men and women of the Catholic Church whose lives serve as models for the Faithful- are all against Islam for the same reasons. The fact is that no branch of Christianity is more anti-Islam than the Catholic Church.Yet how do we explain what Pope Francis has done recently?<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/zM4qKWmX.jpeg"><img alt="zM4qKWmX" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-102781" height="264" sizes="(max-width: 264px) 100vw, 264px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/zM4qKWmX.jpeg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/zM4qKWmX.jpeg 264w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/zM4qKWmX-150x150.jpeg 150w" width="264" /></a>Pope Bl. Urban II, the man who instituted the Crusades.Again, using the examples above and in combination with the history of the Church, Popes are humans- there are good ones and not good ones. Personally, and for far more serious reasons than his relationship with Islam, I do not like this pope- that does not make me "anti-Catholic," nor does it make me a sedevacantist (one who believes that there is no real pope, which is a heresy and which some Catholics sadly believe). It does make me a man with an opinion- just as there are good popes, there are also not good ones.<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/El_Greco_050.jpg"><img alt="El_Greco_050" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-102780" height="300" sizes="(max-width: 223px) 100vw, 223px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/El_Greco_050-223x300.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/El_Greco_050-223x300.jpg 223w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/El_Greco_050-768x1033.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/El_Greco_050-762x1024.jpg 762w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/El_Greco_050.jpg 1576w" width="223" /></a>Pope St. Pius V, the man who put together the Holy League to confront the Muslims at Lepanto and who instituted the Rosary to be said to fight against the Muslims.Pope Francis clearly has an affinity for Islam. He can say whatever he wants as a part of his personal statements, which he has taken full liberty of to express his like of Islam and Muslims and <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/01/20/pope-says-3-children-per-family-is-about-right-catholics-dont-need-to-breed-like-rabbits/">even his disdain for Catholics who have large families (which is something the Church has always encouraged)</a>. Pope Francis, speaking as a man, can say whatever he wants- however, he cannot articular doctrine in such an informal way because he is not speaking as a teacher of faith an morals (called ex cathedra in the Church). <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07790a.htm">Papal infallability is only when speaking as a teacher of faith and morals for the whole Church under certain very specific conditions-</a> it has only been used twice in the last two centuries. One was for articulating the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception under Pius IX in 1854, and the other was for the doctrine of the Assumption under Pius XII in 1950. I should also like to add that both of these particular teachings are not new at all, but were and have been taught since the earliest days of the Church. This is a true usage, since using the example of the trust fund that I gave earlier, the Pope was neither adding to nor subtracting from Church teachings- he was articulating what was already there. <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Inocencius_XI.jpg"><img alt="Inocencius_XI" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-102782" height="300" sizes="(max-width: 231px) 100vw, 231px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Inocencius_XI-231x300.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Inocencius_XI-231x300.jpg 231w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Inocencius_XI-768x996.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Inocencius_XI-790x1024.jpg 790w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Inocencius_XI.jpg 800w" width="231" /></a>Pope Bl. Innocent XI, who coordinated the entire battle against the Muslims at Vienna on September 11th, 1683. Without his important work, it is likely that not only would the battle have not taken place, but it would be in such disarray that the Ottomans would have won.What makes Pope Francis' numerous "off the cuff" statements troubling is not so much that they are his own (and wrong) opinions, but that he is the Pope. While he is free to express his particular opinion, people to look to what he says seriously- many people and wrongly so take his words spoken in this context as doctrine unto itself. The effect is that Pope Francis has not actually changed any church teachings through his actions. However, he has given the impression that doctrine has changed and people start to do things that are wrong because they have been given the wrong impression.<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Pope-foot-washing.jpg"><img alt="Pope-foot-washing" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-102783" height="174" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Pope-foot-washing-300x174.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Pope-foot-washing-300x174.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Pope-foot-washing.jpg 700w" width="300" /></a>This incident of Pope Francis washing the feet of Muslim refugees was unprecedented, and not in a good way. This is not about the dignity of the Muslim people, but the fact that (a) Islam rejects and hates Christ, (b) it appears to give support to a group of people whose beliefs hate the Faith this Pope is meant to uphold and defend, and (c) because the disciples were followers of Christ, the persons whose feet are being washed are meant to represent the original twelve, which is not the case. This was a complete scandal.Tell me, do you think it is an accident that Pope Francis has not made one doctrinal statement while being Pope, but instead made a plethora of "off the cuff" and "pastoral" statements that have no binding theological weight? I do not believe so. I also find it very interesting and likewise not an accident that the Freemason lodges, who are the historical enemies of the Catholic Church, highly anti-clerical, behind the revolutions of the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries in Europe, are praising Pope Francis, and how <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://veritas-vincit-international.org/2015/08/08/why-does-freemasonry-openly-support-pope-francis/">Pope Francis closely mingles with Freemasons</a>. I also do not believe that it is an accident that his papacy comes at the coming of the 100th anniversary of Fatima, which spoke of the communist (and Freemason) infiltration of the Catholic Church.<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Permanent_Instruction_of_the_Alta_Vendita.jpg"><img alt="Permanent_Instruction_of_the_Alta_Vendita" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-102772" height="300" sizes="(max-width: 186px) 100vw, 186px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Permanent_Instruction_of_the_Alta_Vendita-186x300.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Permanent_Instruction_of_the_Alta_Vendita-186x300.jpg 186w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Permanent_Instruction_of_the_Alta_Vendita.jpg 402w" width="186" /></a>The Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendia. A must read (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.fatimamovement.com/i-alta-vendita.php">right here for free</a>) booklet on Freemasonry, a centuries-old enemy of the Faith. The Freemasons have infiltrated the Vatican (as has been known for years), and Pope Francis' open praise by the Freemasons is the first ever for a pope, which generates more questions than it answers.While things are very bad today in the Church, perhaps even worse than they have ever been in history, remember that the Church has faced similar conflicts before. As we have discussed here before, during the 4th century the majority of Christians did not even believe that Jesus was God, even though Sacred Scripture clearly states so. This was the teaching of the heretical priest Arius, whose influence was so great that it was said that 80% or more of all bishops were also apostates. That said, there were good men and women who opposed him. One of them was the bishop of Alexandria, Athanasius. Other great men, such as Gregory Nazianzen and Nicholas, were equally in opposition. When all was said and done, orthodoxy overcame heresy and these men are recognized as saints today while Arius and his teachings are condemned for all time.As much as I am concerned about the situation of Islam in the Church today, I am not as worried, because truth will always and inevitably prevail over heresy and evil, and as we have stated before, echoing the words of the great saints, Islam is simply a heresy- the culmination of all Christian heresies in their final and perfected form. That said, it does not mean that we simply "give up," but taking heed from the Gospel of James, to live and perform deed that demonstrate our fidelity to the truth by our works, for:<div class="g"><div class="rc"><div class="s"><div style="text-align: center">But someone will say, “You have faith and I have works.” Show me your faith apart from your works, and I will show you my faith by my works. - James 2:18</div><div style="text-align: center"></div><div style="text-align: left">As far as Mr. Spencer's comments are concerned, I understand his frustrations, and while I cannot speak for him and he will ultimately believe what he chooses to, I do know three things:</div></div></div></div>First, the Church is promised in <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://biblehub.com/matthew/16-18.htm">Sacred Scripture that as the rock founded upon Peter, the gates of hell will not prevail against it</a>.Second, that the Catholic Church is, was, and will continue to be the greatest warrior against Islam in world history.Third, that if he really is frustrated with the problems in the Church with the apostates in the hierarchy, then consider going to the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ecclesiadei.org/">Latin Mass</a> or the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://sspx.org/">SSPX</a>, both of which are fully in the Catholic Church and are opposed to the changes of Vatican II. Indeed, he would be very welcome.<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/692qwfddfsdewrt.jpg"><img alt="692qwfddfsdewrt" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-102784" height="300" sizes="(max-width: 219px) 100vw, 219px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/692qwfddfsdewrt-219x300.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/692qwfddfsdewrt-219x300.jpg 219w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/692qwfddfsdewrt.jpg 250w" width="219" /></a>St. John Capistrano, the scholar turned warrior who lead an army against the Muslims as an old man and defeated the Ottomans at the Siege of Belgrade in 1456.

anonymous armageddon isis islam war The Catholic Church Has Always Been Against Islam And Will Always Be Against Islam And Nobody Can Ever Change That

King Sobieski of Poland sending the Pope a message about the Christian victory over the Muslims at Vienna Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch...

Muslims Ambush Christian Farmers And Tell Them That Their Lands Belong To The Muslims, They Take Six Christians And Cruelly Butcher Them All

Muslims in Nigeria came to Christian farmers and told them that their lands now belonged to the Muslims and that they needed to vacant their property. They took six Christians and cruelly butchered them all. Here is <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://dailypost.ng/2016/08/15/fulani-herdsmen-kill-six-christian-dominated-area-kaduna/">the report:</a><blockquote>Some gunmen believed to be Fulani herdsmen killed no fewer than six farmers last Saturday in Godogodo, Jema’a Local Government Area, in Kaduna South.Kaduna South is dominated by Christians.The incident is coming barely two weeks after 11 persons were killed and several houses razed down in the same area. Residents told Vanguard that on arrival, the herdsmen told them that their villages had become cattle grazing reserves and wanted them to vacate immediately.Kaduna State Police Spokesman, ASP, Aliyu Usman, who confirmed that six people were killed, said some arrests had been made.</blockquote>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Muslims Ambush Christian Farmers And Tell Them That Their Lands Belong To The Muslims, They Take Six Christians And Cruelly Butcher Them All

Muslims in Nigeria came to Christian farmers and told them that their lands now belonged to the Muslims and that they needed to vacant ...

$2.8 Million American Dollars Donated To The "University Of Jihad" Muslim School

The government of Pakistan has donated $2.8 million American dollars to the "University of Jihad" Muslim school, as we read in <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.rawa.org/temp/runews/2016/06/20/pakistan-gives-2-8-million-usd-to-afghan-taliban-s-madrassa-in-khyber-pakhtunkhwa.html">one report:</a><blockquote>Reports from Pakistan indicate that the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa federal government in Pakistan has allocated Rs300 million Pakistani rupees (over $2.8 million USD) to a madrassa known as the University of Jihad.The madrassa has top Afghan Taliban leaders among its graduates, including the group's supreme leader Mullah Omar, who was announced dead in July last year."I am proudly announcing that Darul Uloom Haqqania Nowshera will get Rs300 million to meet its annual expenditure," Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Minister Shah Farman said in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly this week.He was quoted by Pakistani news agencies as saying that the Imran Khan-led Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (PTI) government in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa was not raiding or targeting religious institutions, but has rather been cooperating and providing financial assistance to them.A number of political analysts have said Haqqania Madrassa is one of the main centers spreading extremism in the region. They say the move to finance the Madrassa proves that Pakistan officially supports terrorism."There are more dangerous madrassas in Pakistan than Haqqania providing military training and recruiting the youth to become terrorists. The branches of the madrassa are in border areas, particularly in Para Chinar, Sadda, Miranshah and in central parts of Waziristan," said Sayed Ishaq Gailani, MP and chairman of the National Solidarity Movement of Afghanistan.According to Afghan security agencies, nearly 6,000 madrassas in border areas close to Afghan soil are promoting extremism and training people for suicide attacks.The Defense Ministry said they will use all their forces to combat those groups or individuals who try to support terrorism."The Ministry of Defense is ready to use all its facilities and capacity against terrorists and is committed to ensuring peace and stability in the country," said deputy spokesman for Defense Ministry, Mohammad Radmanish.The madrassa in Akora Khattak of the Nowshera district in the province is known for having several top Afghan Taliban leaders among its graduates, including Mullah Omar who received an honorary doctorate from the seminary.</blockquote>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war $2.8 Million American Dollars Donated To The "University Of Jihad" Muslim School

The government of Pakistan has donated $2.8 million American dollars to the "University of Jihad" Muslim school, as we read i...

Pedophile In Ohio Grabs Three Year Old Girl, And Sodomizes Her, A Woman Walks In And Sees What He's Doing, He Runs Away And She Chases After Him Until Police Arrest Him

<div id="attachment_102754" style="width: 644px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/370C9B4700000578-0-image-a-47_1470775724291.jpg"><img alt="Charles Sadler, pedophile, worthy of death" class="size-full wp-image-102754" height="476" sizes="(max-width: 634px) 100vw, 634px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/370C9B4700000578-0-image-a-47_1470775724291.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/370C9B4700000578-0-image-a-47_1470775724291.jpg 634w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/370C9B4700000578-0-image-a-47_1470775724291-300x225.jpg 300w" width="634" /></a>Charles Sadler, pedophile, worthy of death</div>A pedophile in Ohio sodomized a a three year old, as he was committing his evil, a woman walked in and witnessed this heinous crime. The evil doer ran off, but the woman chased after him for several blocks, notifying police where he was, and updating officers on where he was moving. She pursued him until the cops caught him. Here is <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3732144/Woman-saves-toddler-catching-man-raping-3-year-old-girl-abandoned-garage.html">the report:</a><blockquote>An Ohio man has been arrested on sexual assault charges after a woman allegedly caught him raping a 3-year-old girl inside an abandoned garage.Charles Sadler, 34, of Columbus, was taken into custody Friday in connection to the alleged assault.According to police, a woman was driving in west Columbus when she heard a scream and saw a man, later identified as Sadler, raping a little girl in the 300 block of South Richardson Avenue.The Good Samaritan, who has children of her own, called 911 and followed Sadler for several blocks until officers responded to the scene and arrested him.Sadler's family told WSYX they thought the 34-year-old was 'passed out drunk somewhere' at the time of the incident.He is currently being held in the Franklin County Jail on $200,000 bond.The alleged victim’s mother took to Facebook Monday, claiming in a heart-breaking post that her 3-year-old's innocence was taken by someone she looked to as ‘an uncle.’The Daily Mail is not naming the mother to protect the identity of her daughter.The mother-of-two from Columbus wrote that Sadler took 'his obsession' for her 3-year-old to 'another level' on Friday while she was being watched by family friends, whom the furious mom called 'unresponsible [sic] adults.'According to the woman, her child offered investigators testimony after being examined in the hospital.She vowed to find justice for her child and urged other parents to hold their babies tight.'The unthinkable became reality to us!' she wrote.In a follow-up status update the mother posted after Charles Sadler's initial court appearance, the mother expressed her frustration with the judge's decision to set bond for his release.Sadler is due back in court August 15.</blockquote>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Pedophile In Ohio Grabs Three Year Old Girl, And Sodomizes Her, A Woman Walks In And Sees What He's Doing, He Runs Away And She Chases After Him Until Police Arrest Him

Charles Sadler, pedophile, worthy of death A pedophile in Ohio sodomized a a three year old, as he was committing his evil, a woman wal...

Homosexual In South Africa Rapes And Sodomizes 18 Month Old Baby Boy

Another reason why homosexuality must be outlawed. A homosexual in George, South Africa raped and sodomized an 18 old boy. Here is <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://ewn.co.za/2016/08/10/Police-investigate-child-rape-in-George">the report:</a><blockquote>Police are investigating an allegation of child rape in George. An 18-month-old baby boy was allegedly sexually assaulted by a male suspect last month.The case was only recently reported to authorities after the little boy’s grandmother took him to hospital for an examination.The police’s Malcolm Pojie says: "While we detained him on sexual assault case that is currently being investigated by the FCS (Family Violence, Child Protection and Sexual Offences Investigations Unit) unit based in George. The allegation that has been made is currently under investigation and we’ve also confiscated two cellphones and as soon as the analysis is back we will pursue the investigation."</blockquote>The Russians are correct: the sodomites are pedophiles.

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Homosexual In South Africa Rapes And Sodomizes 18 Month Old Baby Boy

Another reason why homosexuality must be outlawed. A homosexual in George, South Africa raped and sodomized an 18 old boy. Here is the ...