THE KEY TO UNLOCKING THE SECRET IMAGE OF GUADALUPE: A First Of Its Kind Research In History Revealing Hidden Code In The Image That Will End Islam 0 By Walid Shoebat (Shoebat Sunday Special)The crescent curse is upon us but God has already announced the victory in one fascinating image. Our research provided here is not only the first of its kind in history, but it also reveals hidden codes, not just in regards to the Aztecs of Mexico but hidden messages that Muslims will comprehend, and that will further reveal Mary's role in the destruction of Islam. These messages that were never discovered until now in this fascinating presentation.The time is now. Muslims are lifting up more images of the crescent moon, more than any other time in recent history, attempting to swallow the Cross. God responds with Genesis 3:15, Revelation 11-12 to also etch these prophecies in one fascinating Christian image: Our Lady of Guadalupe. Such images ended much bloodshed. It is a myth to think that such images were exclusively made to end the bloodshed by the Aztecs of Mexico. For in Europe, these ended centuries of Muslim invasions in Spain sending the Muslims back to north Africa. No matter how bad things get, ultimately, the Cross will always prevail against the crescent.So how will Muslims today view such images? Enter a fascinating discovery.Never before has any research been done to explain how Muslims would view such images. Whether one believes in sacred images or they trust only in the biblical account, the message is the same. Our Lady's image for example, does not defy Scripture in any way shape or form. The name Guadalupe is purely Arabic and the image will speak volumes to relate to Muslims in the coming wars just as it was for the Aztecs.THE KEY TO UNLOCKING THE IMAGEFirstly, what is the image's goal? It is to reverse misconceptions, not just about God, but about Jesus, St. Mary and the false theology of Islam which we shall detail in light of the image.God in the image tells His enemies that He functions in reverse of His enemies' thoughts. In Isaiah God said:For as the heavens are exalted above the earth, so are my ways exalted above your ways, and my thoughts above your thoughts. (Isaiah 55:9)The unredeemed upon the earth will always attempt to exalt their standards, yet God will always exalt His, bringing low the gods of the unredeemed. Thats it. This is the crux of the whole issue of the Lady's image which will speak volumes to Muslims in ways never known before in history until now.This concept is proven in Genesis 3:15 where God proclaims that His victory is accomplished by His defeat: "you [the devil] shall bruise his heel". This was defeat. Indeed, Christ's death was defeat from the world's view, but was victory from God's view and also the view of the redeemed of the Lord.Victory therefore is not defined by God's enemies. These deceive themselves since the ultimate victory is accomplished through her [St. Mary's] seed, "he [Messiah] shall bruise your head".Therefore, the whole concept of the image, is that Lucifer's head is brought low. The "head" and the "heel" are the crux of these depictions we find from archeology. Pagan images lift Lucifer's symbols like the crescent. God's images ultimately bring them low as in the Lady's image. Islam lifted the crescent to the highest pinnacle where in John's Apocalypse 12 it is brought low beneath the woman's feet.And there is more. The theme of this image is not to be fulfilled exclusively once in the Apocalypse as commonly interpreted by some, but to be fulfilled continually (Europe, Mexico, and later the Middle East) as to show God's continual victory over the devil by lifting up God's banners in reverse to His enemies wishes.In addition, just the simple 'reversal' of these symbols shows Muslims that Christianity did not evolve from Mithraism as many Muslims accuse. The Lady's image denounces such corruptions by simply setting the record in proper order where what is on top must be brought low. There is heaven (highest) and then there is the pit of hell (lowest).But besides the archeological realm, the image brings to repentance Christians enamored by Islam. So many well intended Christians searching for a morsel of peace within Islam, instead of looking at the crucial differences, peddle the similarities with Christianity saying that 'the Quran honors Mary', 'announces Jesus as Messiah', so on and so forth. Yet here comes the Lady's image proclaiming a fundamental principle that 'difference is what makes all the difference'. The Lady's image by revealing these differences debunks the Quran and blows Islam's ship clearly out of the water (more on that later).Not only does the image debunk Islam, but it reveals its origin and exposes paganism's theft from the true message. The image of Diana for example, where we see the crescent on the top (the head), our Lady reverses this where the crescent is under Her feet in her image.False accusers completely keep key issues out. The notion that Mariology evolved from Ishtar worship was not represented mainly by a statue with a crescent moon on Artemis's head, but by a black stone which was worshiped in Ephesus identified as Artemis (Acts 19:35). This resembles Islam's black stone and not Mariology. Our Lady's image brings these low. This is a huge difference that is completely ignored.Many twist this saying that the crescent in Our Lady of Guadalupe is lifting up St. Mary. But Scripture as well makes it clear, "the moon under her feet". This reverses what was stolen. As Christ said: the thief comes to steal, and to kill, and to destroy (John 10:10). He steals what is true and makes forgeries in order to cause death where "all who hate me love death" (Proverbs 8:36). This is proven from every non-Christian cult that was and is still out there today. By defeating these, God brings life, ending bloodshed and ultimately brings in long lasting peace.Therefore, what we find in pagan archeology are simply manmade forgeries from true originals prior to St. Mary's image which rebuts the agenda of the unredeemed who claim that Christianity evolved from paganism. Such claims therefore are simply done by building on similarities while ignoring the differences. This trick is what generates volumes of worthless reading material claiming that Christianity borrowed from the “Norse Trinity” that the Vikings themselves were Trinitarians or that Jesus is a copy of Horus, Mithras, Krishna, Dionysis and other pagan gods or that Mary is Mother worship of Ishtar as “Queen of Heaven” warned about in Jeremiah 7:18 ...And while much worthless material is written, it takes double good work to refute them. Yet understanding this key locks the door preventing the thief an entry.GUADALUPE DEFEATED ISLAM IN EUROPE WAY BEFORE THE AZTECS IN MEXICOThe name Guadalupe and its significance links to the struggle with Islam much more than the struggle in Mexico when the image came in 1531. There was another icon that played a similar role: Guadalupe de Extremadura. It was a much older image connected to the Spanish Reconquista and the ultimate victory over the centuries-long Islamic invasion of Spain. It is said to have been carved by St. Luke the Evangelist and given to Saint Leander to be brought to Spain’s Extremadura province where it remained until the Muslim Tariq Ibn Ziyad and his armies crossed the Gibraltar towards Spain.When I was Muslim, our history books taught that this invasion was the pinnacle of Islamic expansion into Europe for the ultimate victory of Islam's iconoclasm over the Cross in 711 AD.Being the typical iconoclast, Tariq Ibn Ziyad, after conquering Spain transformed churches into mosques including the Church where this ancient icon of Mary was located. It was said to be hidden at the Guadiana River, also known as the Wolf River, or in Latin, lupe, where Muslims controlled the area and kept the name given by the Spanish, but referred to the local river using the Arabic term wadi (valley, oasis) and hence the name stuck and the river and the surrounding area came to be known as wadi lupe or the way the Spaniards said it: Guadalupe.This western version, while correct, misses how a Muslim would see the name. The West is unaware that we have a wadi lupe in the Sinai, another in Saudi Arabia and yet another in Yemen (more on that later).But as I lived in Mexico, while Protestant at the time, iconoclasm still appealed to some residues left in me from my Muslim traditions. But despite this, the name Guadalupe always rang a bell in Arabic. It is Wadd-a-Lubba which means God of love is in Her core (heart). (more on that later).Had I remained Muslim, the image completely reverses the very five foundations we believed in. It reversed the myths and upheld God's original message; a woman is involved and she is not to be ignored especially that she is stomping the crescent and her name is Waddalubba which means God of love is in Her core (heart).This name construct was no accident.To confirm that names meant much to a Muslim, there was also another Our Lady of the Almudena and like Our Lady of Guadalupe of Mexico it too had the crescent moon under her feet and her name had a message that reversed Islam's foundation flipping it upside down.Almudena is commonly known in Spain to mean 'the citadel'. But Almudena is purely Arabic (مئذنة) and has zero meaning in Spanish. But what the West misses is that in Arabic Almudena means a different type of 'citadel' than commonly known by westerners. It strictly means the minaret.This type of citadel adds a crescent moon on top. So why destine the name of our Lady to be called Almudena? Was St. Mary Muslim and is now lifting up the crescent?Hardly. The very image of Almudena brings the crescent low, below Her feet. To a Muslim, this naming Almudena calls St. Mary as the true citadel and here she points to Allah as lucifer and his symbol under her feet. Al-Mudena is a construct of two words: "Al" (the) and "Mudena (minaret). She is not just any minaret, but the minaret. And since a Mudena's purpose is to proclaim loudly and audibly, five times a day to gather everyone for prayer, here The Citadel, the true Almudena's image persists to proclaim loudly her participation to obey and fulfill God's wish:For the day of the LORD of hostsShall come upon everything proud and lofty,Upon everything lifted up—And it shall be brought low— (Isaiah 2:12)Mary herself declared this in her Canticle, quoted in Luke's Gospel:He has shown strength with his arm; he has scattered the proud in the thoughts of their hearts;he has brought down the mighty from their thrones and exalted those of humble estate (Luke 1:51-52) Her message reverses the whole purpose of Islam bringing low the corruption of the truth, reaffirming John's Apocalypse 12. This prophecy is not to be fulfilled once as commonly interpreted by some, but to be fulfilled continually (until the day of the Lord) as to show God's victory over the devil who thought he won Europe by enforcing Islam in Spain.In 712, prior to the capture of Madrid by the advancing Muslim forces, the inhabitants of the town secreted the image of the virgin, the patroness of Madrid, for its own protection, inside the walls surrounding the town. In the 11th century, when Madrid was reconquered by the King Alfonso VI of Castile, the Christian soldiers endeavored to find the statue. After days of prayer, the spot on the wall hiding the icon crumbled, revealing the statue. Another version of the story says that as Christian soldiers approached the town, they had a vision of Mary imploring them to allow her to lead them into the city. Again the miraculous crumbling of the wall occurred, with the icon showing an entry route through the walls.The Lady simply reverses Muslim logic. Again, in Genesis 3:15, it is through defeat, "you [the devil] shall bruise his heel" yet the ultimate victory is accomplished by her seed, "he [Messiah] shall bruise your head". The "head" and the "heel" are the crux of the whole matter. Through the Church's defeat in Spain, God was eventually victorious as Almudena stomping Allah the crescent, revealing the true citadel.This is exactly what happened when the third icon involving the war with Islam was found: The Guadalupe de Extremadura. Therefore, the Lady's image and its connection to battles and victories against the devil was not exclusive to Mexico's 1531 massive conversion of Aztecs. Nearly two centuries prior to this, the Guadalupe de Extremadura after being lost was miraculously found centuries later in 1326 where a shrine was built in its name. It was the discovery of the image that rejuvenated the Christians under Portuguese King Alfonso IV and Castilian King Alfonso XI and in 1340 dedicated a pilgrimage to the new Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe, entrusting the battle to St. Mary in accordance to Revelation 12. They and the Catholic armies met the forces of Islam at the Salado River in Seville reversing the course and driving the Muslims back to Morocco and bringing down the crescent where it belongs, below the feet.THE NAME 'GUADALUPE' IS ARABIC AND PACKS HUGE MEANING TO MUSLIMS It is here were we enter a fascinating discovery. As the great Fulton Sheen said, "Our Blessed Lady will carry the Moslems the rest of the way to her Divine Son." What is generally known by westerners about the name Guadalupe somewhat relates to Arabic where Guada stemmed from Wadi (Arabic), for "river" "oasis" "valley" and Lupe is Latin for "wolf".But a Muslim would read it differently. Prince Shakib Arslan was known as "Prince of Eloquence" (amir al-balagha) that is the eloquence of the Arabic language. He was an influential Muslim writer, poet and historian who travelled in the footsteps of the Muslims who invaded Spain. In his book "What Arabs Said About The Geography of Andalusia (Spain)," he calls "Guadalupe" as "Wadi Al-Lubb" "وادي اللب".Shakib Arslan "our photo in the mosque of Codova taken 1930"To a Muslim, this makes a major difference. This is the same way any Arabic speaking scholar defines Guadalupe. Why they do this is simple. If a scholar in the Arabic carefully examined how Guada is pronounced in Spanish and how Lupe is pronounced in Arabic it gives an entirely new meaning. Firstly, the "G" is silent (Wadda) and the "p" is always pronounced as "b" (Lubba) since there is no "p" in Arabic. So if you ask any Arab, "say Waddalupe," he will say "Waddalubba" or "Wadi Al-Lubb". Try it.If we stick with the pronunciation Wadd it also means "love" and Lubb means "heart". This packs much for Arab linguists since Arabic is an ancient rich language and these words put together packs a whole theological meaning that opposes Islam completely.Besides the emphases in Arabic that Wadd means "love" it also means "desired" while "Lubb" is "gem" "heart" or to be more specific "core".For example, the 'lubb' of the atom is its nucleus. The 'lubb" of the earth is its core. The 'lubb' of the fruit is its core seeds. The "lubb" is literally "heart" and Lubba is "Her heart" or "Her core".Lubba also means "her neck," but not just any part of a woman's neck, Arabic is very meticulous. In Arabic it is precisely where a woman places the necklace on her neck. So if a Muslim would specifically look at the lubba in the image, he will find a brooch with a black cross which recalls the agony of the death of Jesus Christ on the Cross for the salvation of all mankind. Black here is significant of death and is the attire of sorrow which women dress for forty days. Lubb in Arabic is also wasitat al-qilada (see #4), which signifies "the jewel," "the purest and best from all," and a symbol of sanctity. Wasitat also means the intermediary as the cross here is the bridge between man and God.This "heart" symbolism is clear from the Arabic. But this is not only in the Arabic naming. The experts on Guadalupe would agree that besides what we discovered here that in the image the: "Sacred Heart as we depict it with flames above it. Only in Guadalupe and Fatima apparitions have this sign on the hand appeared which shows they are related."On a side note, Fatima (Muhammad's daughter) is another subject matter for another research, for it says that St. Mary is the true Fatima and not Muhammad's daughter whom the Shiite adore as Christians would adore St. Mary.So what happens when we combine the two words wadda and lubba?There is more to the Arabic than we explained here. While the root wadd and lubb are significant, wadda and lubba are even more significant since the 'a' in the end pertains to a woman (her). Wadda-Lubba in Arabic becomes a packed message. It could mean "love is the desire of her heart".Yet if we use wadd in its most common usage it literally pertains to a male deity which means "the god of love". But what we have here is wadda which strictly means her god of love. Wadd is also regarding someone most precious to a woman, a husband or an only son or firstborn. Adding lubba, the construct becomes rich: Her God of love is in Her core (heart) and is her only son.The use of lubb (core) is no accident. It is no wonder why in Italian the word core is literally heart and in Spanish corazon is also heart: the core.In other words, the message becomes clear that the desired one, this God of love Who is desired, Who is most precious to her, her jewel, this male Son Deity, is in her inner core or what she contains in her inner being Who constitutes love who is also God Himself. Therefore She is pregnant with God.In essence Wadda-Lubba (Guadalupe) has a response to Islam. This "Wadd" (love) is Christ Who was in the Womb of Mary and is why Christians say "blessed is the fruit of your womb (lubb), Jesus." In her womb (lubb) always resides the seed and it is this "fruit of Her womb" that is this blessed one.Adding the image to the name, the construct is remarkably parallel with Christian theology. She is Queen and is the loving Mother and Christ is her Heart and is Her love and He (Jesus) is the very essence of love and He is Her desire as The Father's only Son, conceived as man in the womb of the Virgin Mary.There are no better Semitic words to use than these two Wadda and Lubba to construct such a message. Anyone objecting that two words (there are actually 4 words adding the "a" at the end) construct such meaning need to only examine Arabic dictionaries and see that what we gave here can be found in the Arabic rich Al-Balagha (eloquence of Arabic). In Arabic, just the word lion has 346 names. It is no wonder as to why the Arabic language is used in concordances of the Bible, where the Semitic languages, including Arabic, add richness to the meaning.The premise I set here is not without merit. What scholar of Islam and Arabic can deny that from Arabia's pre-Islamic times and even in Islamic theology, Wadd was proclaimed as a title of God. We have in Islam Allah as "Al-Waddud" (the loving). Wadd is "love" and is also "God" and wadud/waddud is loving and Al-wadud is the loving God which anyone can look up in the 99 names (see #47) on how Muslims define God.Allah in pre-Islamic Arabia was named "Wadd-the moon god which stood at the head of the Minaean Pantheon: Allat, Uzza and Manat were the three daughters of Allah for this Wadd" (Hitti, 2002, pp. 97-98). Allah was called Wadd in Mecca itself.It is not that the name Wadd is evil, Wadd (unlike Allah) is not simply a name but a meaning while Allah is a name. What is evil was the corruption of it by attributing the God of Love (Wadd) to an idol. Scripture for example has no problem with the title "morning star" but God objects that Lucifer attributed such a title to himself, for Christ has a similar title. The devil is depicted as a lion (that devours) and so is Christ depicted as a lion, but He is "the lion of the tribe of Judah" Who devours God's enemies just as the serpent of Moses devoured pharaoh's serpents. Therefore, a serpent is not always a bad thing, for Moses instructed the Israelites to look upon the bronze serpent.What the other message from our Lady's image is the rejection of the moon-god. She proclaims that the God of love (Wadd) is not Allah, but is in the core (lubb) of St. Mary. In other words, the construct says that it was God (Wadd) Who was in Mary's core (lubb). This message refutes the Quran's claim:"they disbelieved when they said: 'Christ, the son of Mary, is indeed God'"-Quran 5:72The message from our Lady is "no," God The Son, her "Wadd" (love) the Creator of heaven and earth is in Her "lubb" (core, womb) and is also Her Heart (the Heart of Mary). This signifies Jesus Christ's physical heart as the representation of His divine love for humanity.All Christians (whether biblicist or traditionalists) should accept this concept. This devotion is not predominantly used in the Roman Catholic Church but is also among some Anglican protestants and Lutherans in devotion to Mary. The rejection of this devotion is only recent in history.The whole construct of the two words (really four words) Wadd-a-Lubb-a is Arabic, just as the name Guadalajara is constructed of two Arabic words "Wadi" (canyon) and "Jarra" (clay, pottery) which means "canyon of the clay" where poetry is made of jarra (clay) and is what we still use for the word clay-pitcher as it is also in Spanish. Such clay is shattered in Daniel 2 by the Rock (Christ). Canyons are always low and the clay (which resembles Islam) is also at the bottom of the image in Daniel 2 and is crushed by Messiah.GUADALUPE'S RADIANCE DEFEATS MUHAMMAD "THE LUMINOUS"But this is not all. Even a more amazing and fascinating discovery is, Our Lady of Guadalupe's image has several crushing responses to Muslims, not just to Allah, but also to his false messenger Muhammad, history's leading heresiarch.Muhammad gained the title of "luminous" and "moon light" after the Battle of Tabuk when Muhammad appeared emerging from the Wada' valley. His appearance sparked the first Muslim hymn Tala'a Al-Badru A'layna ("Here arose the moon upon us"). The moon, again, with the advent of Islam was raised to the pinnacle attempting to reverse God's order.Muhammad was depicted as the badr (full moon) and "the sun" when the Ansar (residents of Madinah) sang greeting Muhammad upon his arrival at Madinah to welcome him. The Sufi Muslims sing it this way:"The full moon (badr) rose over us from the valley of Wada. We ought to be thankful. You [Muhammad] are the sun. You are the full moon. You are light upon light. You are the lamp of the star. You are my spring O messenger"This indeed is the Muslim "hymn of hymns". It is sang to Sultans. Here is Erdogan of Turkey elated at its sounds:From here and like the Aztec deity Huitzilopochtli, according to Islam, Muhammad gained such glorified titles as Al-Siraj Al-Muneer, literally "the Luminous Lamp". The Quran claims that the angel Gabriel addresses Muhammad as such (see Quran 33:45-46) where Muhammad became the "illuminating lamp":"O Prophet, indeed We have sent you as a witness and a bringer of good tidings and a warner. And one who invites to Allah, by His permission, and an illuminating lamp."So as Mesoamerica etched such theology on their emblems, Islam's theology was etched in the main image of the Muslim Ottoman Empire.Such theological forgeries attempt to mimic our Lady's image, transendant light emanating from behind her, Islam had the radiating sun with its transcendent "light upon light" emanating from behind the crescent image (who is Muhammad) and a star (who is also Muhammad) which within it is the glowing lamp (Tughra) which is also Muhammad inside the morning star (which is also Muhammad).This idea had colored later mystical Islam on both the elite and folk levels (Enc. Rel. 11:23). In the Ottoman image, it depicts Muhammad's titles stemming from Allah Who is also described as this light:“the Light of the heavens and the earth... The Parable of His Light is as if there were a Niche and within it a Lamp: the Lamp enclosed in Glass: the glass as it were a brilliant star...luminous...Light upon Light!” (Q 24:35).The imagery spills right out of Scripture regarding Lucifer, the morning star and the star (referred to as "he" a living being) that fell from heaven in Apocalypse 9 as poisoning the waters (nations).But Muslims who would look at our lady's image in conjunction to the Quran and the Ottoman depictions, Muhammad who is identified as "crescent" in Ottoman imagery is now beneath her, dead, since he is black (symbol of death and darkness), at her feet. By this the message from St. Mary is that God never reflected His light on Muhammad which is seen as a lightless dark crescent. He is after all depicted as "the crescent" and even "the full moon" (Badr). Adding to the meanings of the name construct in Arabic Wadda-Lubba, here we have God, Who is in her core, the woman of Genesis 3:15 (not Muhammad) who is the true humble servant to whom God sent Gabriel (not to Muhammad). God splendid Her, not Muhammad, with His light.Apocalypse 12 never said "crescent" but "moon". Yet both are descriptions of Muhammad. He is depicted as Badr (full moon) and crescent. So whether a Muslim reads Apocalypse or sees the image, the conclusions are but the same.With all the construct, had I remained Muslim, the way we would see this is that the Lady's image responds to “Nūr Muhammad (“Light of Muhammad”) which is a term central to later Sufi (Turkey) and Shī`ī (Iran) belief. These are the main composites of the beast of Apocalypse 13 "the leopard" (Greece/Asia Minor) and "the bear" (Persia). The Ottoman emblem appeals to these specific two. These transformed Muhammad into a spiritual, luminous being even beyond Wahhabi theology to a godly status, especially since they call him "light upon light" a title that only belongs to Allah himself in the Quran. For one to rise to the pinnacle in Islam (as Erdogan is trying to do), the multitudes must proclaim him Mahdi. This makes that person as if he was deity in Sufi Islam. This is why the Douay-Rheims Bible had the perfect description:Who opposeth and is lifted up above all that is called God or that is worshipped, so that he sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself as if he were God. (2 Thess 2:4)Islam's last Caliph or Mahdi would never plainly say "I am God". This is why there is this "if" in 2 Thessalonians 2. Whether Muhammad or Mahdi, these are "lifted up" "above all" "as if he were God". The Lady's image brings it down. It simply reverses what was reversed.The aureole or luminous light surrounding the Lady is reminiscent of the "woman clothed with the sun" of Rev. 12:1. The light is also a sign of the power of God who has sanctified and blessed the one who appears.Islam therefore receives similar defeat like Huitzilopochtli after the Aztec religion crumbled. The images, too, crumble. Islam's Al-Siraj Al-Muneer (the glowing lamp) is major; it is one of Allah's 99 names. Muhammad (even the Mahdi) in Islam, is the very reflection of Allah's light:"The moon reflects the sun. The Messenger [Muhammad] ﷺ is al-Siraj al-Munir – a lamp radiating light. He reflects the beauty and majesty of the One who sent him." (Muslim Judicial Council, Saudi Arabia)This false light of Muhammad will too be vanquished by the divine Light in which dwells St. Mary, the Mother of our Salvation.For this reason, both the image and the name Wadda-Lubba defeats Muhammad the 'luminous light' of the moon who arose from the valley of Wada. By this defeat, Muhammad becomes "the crescent curse rose over us, from the valley of Wada, it was brought low" defeated by Wadda Lubba and cursed under her feet.The two religions of the Aztecs and Islam stem from the same thief whom Christ warned us of coming to kill and plunder bringing nothing more than bloodshed through a false sacrificial system where Islam had salvation through martyrdom, where Muslims are saved by the first drop of their shed blood, and the Aztec heart-plucking ensured the victims eternal heaven by shedding their blood. The Aztecs believed that those who were sacrificed or who died in war would become Teo-micqui ("the god-dead") and were said to "go pure... live hard by, nigh unto the sun ... [who] always forever ... rejoice ... [since] the House of the Sun is .... a place of joy." (Sahgun, book 6 verse 21)So when a Muslim believes that his own blood saves, he unknowingly proclaims, like the Aztecs, that he is "the-god-dead" since a Muslim now by shedding his blood becomes Christ like. All these roads stem from the same pit and they all lead to the same pit.But this is not the only light she defeats. The image is a challenge. The Quran is claimed to be a sign (ayat) from heaven written by a humble illiterate simpleton (Muhammad) who presented the Quran as a light from Allah. According to the Quran it says that the whole of humanity including the demons can never replicate anything like it (the Quran).The Virgin Mary, left an Image of herself imprinted miraculously on Juan Diego's tilma called "ayate". Ayat is also Arabic which means "sign, miracle" in Islam. The Quran itself is an "ayat" (sign/miracle).So here comes our Lady with her true sign (ayat) made of a poor quality cactus-cloth (sabra, in Semitic languages), which defies all scientific explanations of its origin while challenging all mankind to replicate it. She is telling Muslims that you have met your match and more. It is as Moses's serpent ate pharaoh's and Mary's ayate (sabra/cactus) ate Muhammad's ayat (Quran as a miracle). Sabra (cactus) is the symbol of connecting to the biblical land of Israel. So here comes St. Mary of Israel with her sign to meet the challenge, using cactus.GUADALUPE ARE REAL LOCATIONS IN ARABIAFew westerner even know that Wadi Lubba (وادي لبة) exists in the Sinai. It too packs much in another message.So what is Wadi Lubba doing in the Sinai?First of all, the Sinai is named after Sin the moon god. Mary defies the cult and its symbol which spread from Mesopotamia to Anatolia.Galatians 4 speaks of such symbolism between the god Sin and the woman. It is the war between 'the twos', this continuing duel between righteousness over unrighteousness, between two women, Sarah's seed vs. Hagar's seed, Isaac vs. Ishmael which corresponds to Genesis 3:15. The core (lubb) of such battles stem from "Sinai" which "is in Arabia" (Gal 4:25). This analogy is the hint and the clue Galatians 4 calls "an allegory". She conquers Sin through Her Son. There are in fact three places called "Wadi Lubba" (وادي لبة) one in the Sinai, Egypt, another in Saudi Arabia and another in Yemen. These (Sinai, Saudi Arabia and Yemen) are the very heart of what history calls Arabia, and which Isaiah 21 renders as "Babylon is fallen, is fallen."What transpired in Mexico will also transpire in the heart of Islam. God sees no difference between Arabia's pre-Islam, Islam, or Mesoamerica. They worshiped the crescent moon in pre-Christian Mexico as Quetzalcoatl, and for Mary to be seen stepping on the crescent, signified her vanquishment over their heathen god. As one scholar puts it: "Her foot rested in the crescent moon - She had clearly vanquished their foremost deity, the feather serpent 'Quetzalcoatl', this being the primary reason for converting the Aztecs of Mexico.But the crescent is not the predominate symbol of the Aztecs, the Muslim world dominates with this symbol. The same image has an ultimate future fulfillment which was prophesied by John in Revelation 11-12. Initially this dragon seems victorious where the woman is hidden. But the end of this "red dragon" is not depicted in John's imagery. Yet Her image reveals the conclusion. The attempt to devour the woman by the dragon coming from under her is simply silenced by crushing the beast.GUADALUPE DEFEATS THE CRESCENT-BOW-ALLAH INCLUDING IT'S MAHDIAn eye opening discovery is "the stele at Petra" dedicated to Qos-Allah (Glueck 516). It sheds more light in understanding the symbolism behind our Lady's image. The Arabic "Qos" or "Qaus" literally meant "bow" and the crescent-bow symbolized Allah and still does. This hunter Allah was also found with the same name "Alla[h]" in the Epic of Atrahasis chiseled on several tablets dating to around 1700 BC.This is extremely ancient. The stele at Petra is horned and displays a star and crescent (Browning 28), both consistent with a moon deity. In fact, in Islam it is forbidden to call a rainbow anything but Qos-Allah (Allah's bow). This even drew the shape of the Muslim sword in crescent form resembling the crescent-bow of Allah. So from a Muslim perspective when viewing the image, the Lady is not exclusively threshing the crescent, the very symbol and honor of Islam, but also Islam's sword and the bow of the Mahdi.How the latter is explained is simple. The early Muslim transcription of prophet Mohammed’s Hadith, Ka’b al Ahbar writes: “I find the Mahdi recorded in the books of the Prophets...For instance, the Book of Revelation says: ‘And I saw, and behold a white horse. He that sat on him had a bow ... he went forth conquering and to conquer.’” Egyptian authors Muhammad Ibn ‘Izzat and Muhammad ‘Arif then go on to say, “It is clear that this man is the Mahdi who will ride the white horse and judge by the Qur’an (with justice) and with whom will be men with marks of prostration on their foreheads.”In essence the Lady's image is threshing the Mahdi's bow.And this is not without merit. The pride of the Muslim Ottomans shooting the bow while riding backwards on their horses are "Tarshish, Pul and Lud, that draw the bow, to Tubal, and Javan..." (Isaiah 66:19). These today are the Turkic regions whose pride is the crescent, the bow and war. Even the Antichrist is described holding a bow: "And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer." (Rev 6:2)First of all, both John and our Lady's image shows that Christianity did not evolve from paganism where bow and crescent was honored. On the contrary God denounces such corruption and announces Mahdi's defeat: “Then I will knock the bow out of your left hand, and cause the arrows to fall out of your right hand" (Eze 39:3).God Himself uses imagery in Scripture, for an image speaks a thousand books. This is the Red Dragon who "persecuted the woman, who brought forth the man child" by "making war with the rest of her seed, who keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ." The image also depicts Her conquering what injured her heart: "And thy own soul a sword shall pierce ..." (Luke 2:35). Persecuting "her seed" is persecuting Christ as if a sword pierced Wadda-Lubba the very Love of Her Core (Heart). Therefore, She threshes "the bow" which is Islamic warfare: Jihad. She also threshes Allah himself.She in turn provides humanity with Christ, the ultimate and only acceptable sacrifice. In Chapter 2 of St. Luke's Gospel, the evangelist twice reports that Mary kept all things in her heart, that there she might ponder over them. Luke 2:35 recounts the prophecy of Simeon that her heart would be pierced with a sword.Simeon presents an image (the pierced heart). This became the most popular representation of the Immaculate Heart. St. John's Gospel further invited attention to Mary's heart with its depiction of Mary at the foot of the cross at Jesus' crucifixion. St. Augustine said of this that Mary was not merely passive at the foot of the cross; "she cooperated through charity in the work of our redemption". St. Leo said that through faith and love she conceived her son spiritually, even before receiving him into her womb [lubb], and St. Augustine tells us that she was more blessed in having borne Christ [her Wadd] in her heart than in having conceived him in the flesh.Such piercing is metaphorical depicting the suffering of God's people. The bent dagger (Hanzar) of Islam which was made in the shape of the crescent was on purpose, in honor to Allah, who was depicted throughout Islam as crescent, even during Nazism, when the Ottoman-Nazi conscripts of the Hanzar (literally Muslim dagger) division, which besides persecuting the Jews, they persecuted also "the rest of her seed who keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ."How Muslims see this, is that St. Mary here is clearly seen stepping on the crescent bow including the sword that symbolically pierced her heart when Muslims kill "the remnant of her seed" (the Christians).But this is not all. To a Muslim, this stomping includes everything else that is the pride of Islam. Again, the image does not differentiate between Allah pre-Islam or post Islam for the simple reason that there are several Nabatean inscriptions in the Sinai and other places displaying widespread references to names regarding this deity including Allah and Shalm-lahi 'Allah is peace' (we have continually heard that Allah is the god of peace) and Shalm-allat, 'the peace of the goddess Allat' (Allat is the feminine Allah the transgender god), Amat-allahi 'she-servant of Allah' and Halaf-llahi (Caliph 'the successor of Allah').The image stomping the crescent (Qaus Allah) is perhaps the response to the god of the bow and war (Jihad), Allah (as he is depicted in the Ottoman emblem). This includes not just Allah, but his crescent sword, Allah's coming last caliph, Allah's approval of transgenders and Islam's false peace (we have continually been bombarded that Islam means peace).This is summarized therefore in the image we clearly see: her foot stepping on the crescent the very symbol of Qaus-Allah.But this is not all.GUADALUPE DEFEATS ISLAM'S FOUNDATIONThe woman of Revelation 12 has 12 stars. There are 12 disciples. God's Temple has 12 gates and the Lady's image appeared on 12/12 of the years 1531. This would be the twelfth day of the twelfth month regarding an image mentioned in the twelfth chapter of the Apocalypse and she had twelve stars.Twelve is holy.Converting that date to an Islamic Hijri calendar would mean that St. Mary appeared on 2 Jumada Al-Awwal (I Jumada) year 938 Hijri. Jumada I is the fifth month in the Islamic calendar.One of Islam's holiest numbers is five.Islam has five daily prayers. Its pillars are five. In Islam, particularly Shia Islam, the Panjetan or Holy Pentagram, also known as Ahl Al-Bait or People of the House, the Five Holy Purified Ones are the members of Muhammad's family: Muhammad, Ali, Fatima, Hasan, and Husayn and is often symbolically represented by an image of the Khamsa (five). The five-pointed star is part of the symbol of the Ottoman Empire and has been a Muslim symbol for multiple Muslim works, most notably on flags. Islam's most blasphemous chapter is the fifth chapter (Maʼida "The Table") mentioning Mary in the most blasphemous verses:"they disbelieved when they said: 'Christ, the son of Mary, is indeed God'; whereas Christ had said: 'Children of Israel! Serve Allah, Who is your Lord and my Lord.' ...Those who said: 'Allah is one of the Three' ...The Messiah, son of Mary, was no more than a Messenger"The Quran: An Encyclopedia says, "The Quran’s objection to Christian practice is Christianity’s shirk, its worship of Jesus, Mary and the saints ‘in derogation of Allah’. There is no justification in believing in the Trinity, for Jesus never would have condoned such a concept". "Jesus is the son of Mary" is what Muslims and schismatics title Mary where true Christians are accused of "Mary worship" and "Saint worship".Yet here appears St. Mary in this image with humble eyes looking downward in worship and her queenly hands and the sleeve cuffs with fur means royalty/Jewish nobility. Indeed, this is a humble Queen in prayer to God and not in splendor of deity.The Quran in 66:12 describes Mary as Qānitah where Mary is in constant submission and prostration to Allah.If Muslims see the lady's image, St. Mary has the very symbol of Allah (the crescent) in prostration to her as Allah was brought low by her. The image debunks many who claim that "the Quran honors Mary". The Quran in fact denigrates Mary in the most vile ways:“And Maryam (Mary) daughter of Imran, who kept safe her vagina so We breathed in it [her vagina] of Our Spirit ..." (Quran 21:90-91)Modern Muslims are embarrassed of this verse and cannot easily explain it.But back to our number 5 in Islam. In the fifth Sura it specifically denigrates Catholics:"And behold! Allah will say: "O Jesus the son of Mary! Didst thou say unto men [Catholics], 'Take me [Jesus] and my mother for two gods ..." (Qur'an 5:116)Muslims and other heretics accuse Catholics of Mary worship, and this verse evinces that Islam was founded as an anti-Catholic cult.Besides the Quran in its most blasphemous fifth chapter, so many are the slandering works that attempt to hint an evolution of the Catholic faith from paganism by showing visual similarities between pagan depictions vs. Catholic. On the contrary, it is paganism that stole from the truth "The thief came only to steal".Therefore, it is the difference which makes all the difference. This is what we should be focused on and not the similarities when comparing forgery with genuine. Waddalubba shows "enmity" and not glorification of the crescent. Pagan female deities uphold the crescent on their heads and arms just as Antichrist will demand from his followers. Such is the enmity "between thee [lucifer] and the woman [Mary]" where "her seed shall crush thy head" (Genesis 3:15).In the the Latin Vulgate it says "she shall crush thy head". Without getting into the controversy regarding "She" and the "He" (schismatics love to speak of this controversy) it does not take away the Marian understanding of the passage since the power of the devil (as the image portrays) is broken through Jesus, Mary’s Son where all Christians regardless of their persuasion would agree.GUADALUPE DENOUNCES ISLAM'S ICONOCLASMShe appears as an image. This alone is offensive, not just to Muslims, but to all who reject She is our Mother. Schismatics need to ask a crucial question: why do they agree with Muslims on this one? There are images that God considers unholy while other images like the Ark with angelic cherubs and even Christ and Peter depicted as rocks. These depictions too are holy. And they are in scripture. Islam's black stone is unholy just as the "image of the beast" (Rev 15:2) and in Acts 19:35 another stone (representing Artemis with the crescent moon on her forehead) is also unholy: "any man who worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead ..." At the Battle of Lepanto Christian ships formed the image of the Cross with the leading ship hoisting the image of our Lady of Guadalupe, and defeated the crescent formation of Ottoman ships in the greatest naval battle in history.But the battle is not over. Where Islam rules, their crescent image is always on top higher than the cross.My own village, Beit Sahour in Bethlehem also known as the Shepherd's Fields where the angels proclaimed the birth of the King Messiah. God will not be silent where the crescent (this is the very mosque I attended) is above the Cross.To a Muslim looking at the lady's image, here comes St. Mary dressed with virtuous attire to give Her view of what she thinks of this dark symbol hoisted on high and she reverses it. Using Islam's own etiquette when Muslims enter a mosque under their crescent pinnacles by taking off their slippers entering always with the right foot, never the left, here comes St. Mary using her right foot not to enter a mosque but to step on its highest pinnacle, the crescent, and without even taking off her gray colored royal slipper. Few focus on this part of the image.As for me, a man born and raised in the land of the shepherds who were first to witness the proclamation of His birth, I had once ignorantly stoned with my very young sons her image at St. Francis of Assisi in Concord California. Now I will rise at Her amazing portrait begging forgiveness:O clement, O pius, O gentle Mary.O shepherds, rise before your God, relate what you have seen of Christ.(Special thanks to sister Kelly Ann for sparking this research). anonymous armageddon isis islam war THE KEY TO UNLOCKING THE SECRET IMAGE OF GUADALUPE: A First Of Its Kind Research In History Revealing Hidden Code In The Image That Will End Islam By Walid Shoebat ( Shoebat Sunday Special ) The crescent curse is upon us but God has already announced the victory in one fascinatin... Read More...» How's That "Integration" Coming? New Vest-Clad And Burka-Wearing Shariah Patrols Spotted Walking, Driving Around With Islamic Flags Patrolling The Streets Of More European Cities 0 One of the Shariah patrols, coming to a city near youSo, how goes those new Muslims arrivals?My only questions at this point is- are they being taxpayer funded? As we pointed out in a recent video, the European governments are set on promoting Islam to the suicidal destruction of their own people. Since we know that as we speak right now Muslims are being trained as soldiers at taxpayer expense, it is only logical that Muslim police patrols come sooner:Eyewitnesses reported seeing three people wearing burkas and black gloves driving around Hamb_urg's Wandsbek district in a black VW.They said a sticker with an Islamic logo and the words Sharia Police was fastened to the car's bonnet.There were also reports of another incident in the Dammtor area of Hamb_urg where witnesses claim to have seen five to seven masked people sitting in a van.Islamic and ISIS symbols were said to be hanging from the vehicles rear-view mirrors.The sighting were similar to incidents reported in thew city of Wuppertal near Düsseld_orf where a group of people who wore vests with the words 'Sharia Police' urged passersby to stop drinking alcohol and refrain from gambling to ensure strict Islamic moral laws were being observed.Police and politicians said they were unaware of the latest reports but a local councillor said the authorities needed to keep close eye on the situation to ensure the incidents were not repeated. (source)Of course the police are going to do nothing- they are under orders not to do anything for fear of losing their jobs and being prosecuted.And that is the problem, right there. With no Christian Faith to give the European people meaning and purpose in life, their ability to defend themselves and assert their identity has been completely stripped. Weak, vulnerable, confused and without an identity, they derive their worth from social self-identification by those in power. And should those men in power find it to determine the extinction of their own people, these same men entrusted with protecting society will stand down and permit for the extinction to happen because they derive their identity from those same power brokers.As I have said before, Islam and Muslims are very weak- they do not so much invade, but move into power vacuums created by apostasy. That is what Islam is doing here and why nobody is stopping it, and why it will not be stopped until they rediscover the only Faith which ever combated successfully against Islam. anonymous armageddon isis islam war How's That "Integration" Coming? New Vest-Clad And Burka-Wearing Shariah Patrols Spotted Walking, Driving Around With Islamic Flags Patrolling The Streets Of More European Cities One of the Shariah patrols, coming to a city near you So, how goes those new Muslims arrivals? My only questions at this point is- are... Read More...» Remember That Program Where The Swedish Government Paid Swedish Children To Spend Time With Muslims- Did The Swedish Government Just Cover Up A Gang Rape Directly Caused By That Program? 0 Muslims in Malmo, Sweden, one of Sweden's most heavily Muslim areasEarlier this month we wrote about a new program from the Swedish government to promote "multiculturalism." Basically, the Swedish government started paying Swedish children and teens to spend time with Muslims with the goal of helping them learn about Swedish culture and integrate into society. While we said this would be about as successful as trying to evenly mix oil into water and the end result would be even more rapes and disorder- as though Sweden did not have enough, since it is the "rape capitol" of Europe- the government insisted.In this most recent case of a brutal gang rape of a Swedish teen girl by migr_ants, it is interesting to not two things- the girl knew all of the Muslims in question, they were friends (apparently rather recently), but further details of how they met are not being disclosed. This is very odd, since this is usually one of the first things discussed.The fact that this woman is a (a) teenager, (b) is friends with these Muslim refug_eees, and (c) how they met is being kept very quiet leads me to ask- Did these people meet through one of these government programs?If so, it might be one of the first recorded cases where the Swedish government directly facilitated the rape of one of its own by Muslims:According to documents from the court that Free Times noted there was a rape, as many of the ref_ugee children attended, on Wednesday, just over two weeks ago.Aftonbladet writes that the assault was carried out against a woman in connection with a party.Ref_ugee children suspected for at least another three rapes and sexual molestation.Two of rape should have taken place on Friday and Saturday, 22 and 23 July.They are women over 15 years and, according to media reports acquainted with the refu_gees already. Of trial documents shows that there are at least two victims. (source)...The suspected crimes have been made against two people, according to the documents, and according to the police is a matter of women.Regarding the event, classified as aggravated rape, four young people, guys, been arrested - but released after a decision by the prosecutor referring to the suspects age.- There have been four detainees where arrest has been lifted, says chief prosecutor Pernilla Åström in Southern Skåne Public Prosecution.According to documents from Lund District Court is the suspected youth of 15-17 years old.- Criminal suspicions against them remain, says Robert Loeffel, press officer at the police in Region South."Is an acquaintance"Police said there is no question of any rapes. According to Aftonbladet, at least one rape in which several offenders were involved occurred in connection with a party.- There is a causal relationship between suspected perpetrators and the victims, but I can not say much more, says Robert Loeffel.The suspected perpetrators defense lawyers say their clients deny the charges.- He denies the crime. That he has been released may well have to do with many factors, but above all I think of age. It requires a great deal in order to detain someone who is so young, says Rasmus Loven lawyer representing one of the younger guys. (source) anonymous armageddon isis islam war Remember That Program Where The Swedish Government Paid Swedish Children To Spend Time With Muslims- Did The Swedish Government Just Cover Up A Gang Rape Directly Caused By That Program? Muslims in Malmo, Sweden, one of Sweden's most heavily Muslim areas Earlier this month we wrote about a new program from the Swedis... Read More...» Make No Mistake About It, There Is Going To Be A Great World War Between Christendom And The Turkish Armies Of The Antichrist 0 By Theodore ShoebatIn the history of Christendom, there is this continuous fight, between the crusaders and the Turk. From the early Middle Ages onwards, this struggle between the Christians and the Turks has been taking place, and will continue to transpire until Kingdom Come. It does not matter what false religion they believe in, be it Islam or paganism, the Turk will always be a menace to civilization. Let us start with the Huns. The Huns were part of the Turkic peoples, and they invaded Europe and slaughtered the Christians with the edge of the sword. Not only this, but they specifically targeted priests and butchered them in front of their altars. St. Gregory of Tours provides us with a most graphic description of this sanguinary vanquishment when the Huns invaded France:“The Huns migrated from Pannonia and laid waste the countryside as they advanced. They came to the town of Metz, so people say, on Easter Eve. They burned the town to the ground, slaughtered the populace with the sharp edge of their swords and killed the priests of the Lord in front of their holy altars.” (1) This is exactly the type of violence that would be perpetrated by the later Muslim Huns, that is, the Islamic Turks (2), the Seljukians and other Central Asian Turks, and their later successors of Islamic empire, the Ottomans. The Turks who migrated to the Near East were the Oghuz, a confederation of twenty Turkic tribes from Central Asia, who arrived to the Iranian plateau, for the purpose of plunder. (2a)Mongolians, the original Turks When they first entered the region the Turks were not Islamic; many of the Turks were Buddhists and Shamanists, and there would also be a small minority of Nestorians in their midst. These people did not appear as those who are living in modern day Turkey. These Turks were the originals, fierce warriors who fought with devastating and formidable force on the backs of their horses, with great dexterity with the bow and arrow, cutting angles in their battle formations and instilling in all their enemies a great feeling of fear and consternation.They were slanted eyed, Altaic peoples, and did not look like the people of modern day Turkey, who are, for the most part, Islamized Greeks and Eastern Europeans who were conquered by Turks from the Middle Ages onwards to the modern era, and brainwashed into taking the identity of their Altaic conquerers. The Turks who migrated to the Near East in the eighth century came from the Orkhon and Selenga valleys of Mongolia. Ibn al-Athir made mention of how “Some Khurasani historians have mentioned that these Oghuz came over to Transoxiana from the regions of the marches which are the remotest Turkish lands during the reign of the Caliph al-Mahdi (775-85 AD).” Transoxiana is where Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, southern Kyrgyzstan and southwest Kazakhstan are located today, and it is where much of today’s Turks live. The famous Arab traveler, Ibn Fadlan, spoke of an Oghuz presence in the Khwarezm region, which lies in Central Asia. The Khwarezm were just as vitriolic as their Turkic predecessors, the Huns, slaughtering Christians and butchering priests in front of their altars, just as the Huns did. In the year 1244, an army of Khwarezm Muslim Turks, alongside a force of Egyptian warriors, invaded the Holy Land. They invaded Gaza and slaughtered five thousand Christians. They murdered the Master of the Templars and the Archbishop of Tyre, they took priests and stabbed them to death right in front of their altars as they screamed out, "let us pour their blood on the place where they poured out wine in commemoration of their crucified God.” The Huns were pagans, the Khwarezm Muslim, but both were Turks, and both exhibited an insatiable hatred for the Christian Faith.Seljukian art Ottoman Turk artMany battles were fought between the carriers of the Cross and the pagan Huns. In the early sixth century, the Persian king, Kawad, took a force of Huns to invade the Christian city of Edessa, in Syria. One reads the ancient record of the battle and feels a sense of awe as to how immense were the armies of the Persians and Huns. Kawad marched his armies from the Euphrates and arrived at Edessa, and so great were the numbers of the heathen; their camp reached from the areas of Mar Cosmas and Mar Damian, to the church of Mar Sergius and the village of Bekin, as far as the church of the Confessors, and the width of the heathen camp was said to have been as far as the descent of Serrin. The Persians and Huns surrounded the entire city of Edessa, and one could have witnessed, standing on the peaks of lofty hills, peering past the desert air, meeting the gaze of their determined Christian enemies. They were like locusts filled all places, an innumerable multitude of men (Judges 6:5). As wolves surround their prey, as hawks circle above creatures they desire to consume, the Persians and the Huns encircled the city. Areobindus was the defender of the Christian force; he led a strong and determined army, around 12,000 warriors, veterans of previous battles, hardened by the ways of the sanguinary frays. Their hands were ready to strike, their hearts prepared for combat and death. Some of the warriors rushed outside the city walls and the fight ensued. The Christians, with unsheathed weapons struck hard upon the enemy, their blade bespattered with Hunnic blood, with silver and crimson glimmering under the light of the white moon. As the battle went on, young men launched stones upon the pagans with catapults to repulse them away from the wall, and women rushed out to provide water for the fighters. Many a heathen fell dead, but not one Christian perished in that battle. The enemy fled to the village of Kubbe, and it is quite profound the behind them, on the walls of Edessa, it was written in Greek: “Christ God, he who hopes in you is never confounded.” (3) Byzantine Christians fighting with ArabsHere the Hun Turks allied with the Persians, in the Crusades, the Muslim Turks allied with the Persians to fight the Christians. Nothing changed from John's proclamation in Apocalypse 13, where the feet of the bear (Persia) unites with the "body of a leopard" (Turkey). Gog and Magog simply repeats itself until Kingdom Come (Ezekiel 38).When the Turkic pagans were in the Middle East, they did not immediately all convert to Islam. There were ongoing battles between Turks who had converted to Islam and other Turks who wanted to maintain their traditional religious beliefs. Ibn al-Athir reports on how, in the 11th century, ten thousand Turks had converted to Islam, and exclaims: “Allah thus eliminated their evil from being directed towards Muslims.” (4) The statement alludes to the violence that was being by the Turks before they converted to Islam. With or without Islam, the Turk was evil and bent on conquest and despotism. The tenth century treatise, Hudud al-alam, speaks of the violent expansionism of the Oghuz (or Ghuz) Turks, prior to their conversion to Islam:“The Ghuz have no towns, but the people owning felt-huts are very numerous. They possess arms and implements (silah va alat) and are courageous and daring (shukh) in war. They continually make inroads (ghazw) into the lands of Islam (nawahi-yi islam), whatever place be on the way (ba har ja’i uftadh), and [then] strike (bar-kuband), plunder, and retreat as quickly as possible.” The Oghuz Turks who converted to Islam were part of a branch of Turk called the Seljuk. These originated from a subbranch of Turkic people called the Qarakhanids, who initially were ruled by a Manichaean elite, but they also consisted of many Buddhists. The Qarakhanids conquered the area of Balasaghun in Kyrgyzstan, and it was after this, in the mid-tenth century, that they converted to Islam. From the Islamic Qarakhandids, came a fringe family who broke away from them, these were Seljuks, founded by Saljuk ibn Duqaq, and it was these Turks who would commence the first Turkish Islamic empire. (5) The reason behind Saljuk’s conversion to Islam was not sincere spiritual theological conviction, but rather it was to increase the forces of his tribe, and thus to aid his already insatiable thirst for domination and power. It is another evidence as to the way of the Turk: regardless of his religious convictions, he will be tyrant. Saljuq, according to the Syriac historian Bar Hebraeus, said:“If we do not enter the faith of the people of the country in which we desire [to live] and make a pact with them (or conform to their customs), no man will cleave to us, and we shall be a small and solitary people.” (6) After this was said, the Seljukians sent an envoy to the Khwarazm city of Zandak and requested that Islamic scholars be sent to them to teach them about Islam. The Muslims in Zandak sent to the Turks a Muslim missionary (or mubashshir). (7)The type of Islam that the Turks accepted, however, was not exactly the mechanical form of Sunni Islam that most Muslims follow, but the severely mystical Sufi Islam, which appealed to them more since it was quite paralleled to Buddhism. From Attila the Hun to the Muslims who massacred the Armenians, they brought nothing constructive, only death. Like the Huns, the Seljuks hated Christians and invaded Christendom. The Seljuks under Togril invaded and overtook significant regions of Georgia, they also seized Christian Mesopotamia, Melitene, Koloneia, and all of the regions adjacent to the Euphrates River. If it was not for the brave Romans who fought and died striving to defend their lands, the Turks would have reached all the way to the Christian lands of Galatia, Honorias, and Phrygia. (8) The Seljuks did not cease with their conquests and pillaging, but like the wolves they so revered, they continued their hunt for domination and their establishing of an Islamic empire. (9) They continued their Mongol strategies of battle, eventually coming to the territories of Christendom. Thus a writer of old Christendom, Matthew of Edessa, wrote of this brood of vipers:"In the beginning of the year a calamity proclaiming the fulfillment of divine portents befell the Christian adorers of the Holy Cross. The death-breathing dragon appeared, accompanied by a destroying fire, and struck the believers in the Holy Trinity. The apostolic and prophetic books trembled, for there arrived winged serpents come to vomit fire upon Christ's faithful… At this period there gathered the savage nation of infidels called Turks. Setting out, they entered [our] province and put the Christians to the sword. Facing the enemy, the Armenians saw these strange men, who were armed with bows and had a flowing hair like women." (10) With this said, surely were these the people of Antichrist who St. John saw when he wrote: "And they had hair as the hair of women, and their teeth were as the teeth of lions." (Revelation 9:8)And surely were these the people of whom St. John wrote: And the dragon was angry against the woman: and went to make war with the rest of her seed, who keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ. (Revelation 12:17) Seljuk archerThe Romans were suddenly attacked by this unknown race of barbarian, one more sinister, fierce and savage than the regular Muslims they were used to fighting. The Turkish horsemen overran a frontier of six hundred miles from Tauris to Arzeoum. With their endurance fit for the highest peaks of Asia, and their horses conditioned for the most fatiguing sprints of war, these Mongols shed the blood of a hundred and thirty thousand Christians for the appeasement of Allah. In the Persian city of Tus alone, the Seljuks massacred one hundred thousand people. When the Seljuks entered Nishapur, they immediately wanted to plunder. Their leader, Togril, prevented them from doing so because it was Ramadan, in which war is forbidden. His fellow tribesmen began to mock him, jokingly talking about how Togril all of a sudden made himself a religious authority to pass Islamic decrees. The Seljuks finally reached a compromise, that they could slaughter, rape and plunder after the Eid al-Fitr, or the end of Ramadan. “Grant them respite for the rest of this month,” said Togril, “after the [‘Id of] al-Fitr, do what you will (a’malu ma shi’tum ba’d al-fitr).” (12) The Turks, being Muslim, slaughtered other Muslims on Ramadan, revealing their priorities, and one of them was not Islam, but plunder and domination. When the Seljuks entered Halwan, they raped the women and “deflowered the virgins.” “Every beauty they came across,” says al-Katib al-Ishfahani, “they disfigured. Every fire they passed, they extinguished. Every house they passed, they dismantled. How many dams they broke, how much shame they left behind … Many kings escaped from their path, fearing the Turks … Every town they entered they subjugated the people. They ruled the towns through fear and terror.” (13) Bar Hebraeus wrote of the Turks: “In every place where his troops meet together they plunder, and destroy and kill.” (14)The Huns slaughtered, and they were not Muslim; the Seljuks slaughtered, and they were Muslim. I am not attempting to exempt Islam, but what I am arguing, is that the pagan Turkic peoples, being averse to Christianity, has, for centuries, been an enemy of Christianity. Even if they did not convert to Islam, they would still be a menace to Christendom, as is evidenced by the Huns and the Mongolian Empire. Seljuks were simply another part of the Mongolian expansionism that was taking place from the time of the rise of the Huns. As the historian Hilaire Belloc wrote:“It is remarkable that the Mongol hordes, from their first wave onward, had fitted in at once with the social structure and creed of Islam. … Their own bloody or absurd superstitions, barbaric as they were, without substance or philosophy or reason, yielded at once to the religious spirit of the society into which they came. They became not only Mohammedan, but fanatically Mohammedan, and through their military power what had already begun to be the decline of Mohammedanism recovered.” (15) if it were not for the Turk converting to Islam, and leaving his shamanistic religion, Islam would be nothing today, probably just a small sect like the Zoroastrians, written of in a few obscure books, and a footnote in some others. When the Arabs controlled Syria, Armenia, North Africa, Iraq, Arabia, Iran, and other lands of the East, they were not capable of controlling their provinces due to their lack of unity and military strength. The Arab would conquer a land only to lose it just as fast as he captured it. The intermixture of other peoples with the Arabs, on account of the conquests of Persia, the Berbers and other Asian tribes, diluted Arabian unity on which Islamic strength rested, and division sprung amongst the Muslims, for "iron cannot be mixed with clay." (Daniel 2:43) Hope was lost for the utopian vision of Muhammad, and it was believed that the Arab Islamic empire was finally about to crumble and allow the Christian Byzantine Empire to recover what it had lost from Muslim invasions. Until all of a sudden bands of Mongol hordes, experts in archery and cruelty, swiftly swarmed into the Middle East where they would find a religion that fit their savagery, Islam. By becoming Muslims, the Mongols, being stronger in body and more warlike than the Arab, reinvigorated the Islamic empire. By the eleventh century they would replace the Arabs in power, and with their sadism and destructive temperament, they ravaged, pillaged and massacred everywhere they went, dominating the central power of the Muslim world.Ottomans besiege Nicopolis, 1396Islam was founded by Arabs, but was nothing without the Mongol Turk, who was bent on expansionism and violence even before he discovered Islam, a religion that he would accept only to give spiritual sustenance to his sanguinary desires of empire. Togril once told the Caliph: “If I did not honor you, I would have destroyed all Baghdad with the edge of the sword.” (16) The Turk was going to do what a Turk did: slaughter, ravish and plunder. What kept him from annihilating much of the people was the common religion of Islam that he shared with the local Muslims, and notwithstanding this, the Turks still slaughtered Muslims for their own gain. After the Seljuks converted to Islam, they would become very loyal fighters and advancers for the cult of Muhammad. Muslim princes hired the Seljuks as mercenaries, and soon they emerged to become governors of provinces, and then from there they became rulers over entire regions. (17) as we read in one eleventh century letter, written by the Seljuks to the Caliph al-Qa’im Bi-Amr Allah:“We, the servants from the family of Saljuq, have been a perpetually obedient group, supporters of the state (dawlat) and obedient to Islam and helping it (mitwa’ wa mu’adid-i islam). We have always striven in waging war against the enemy and jihad, and have been assiduous in visiting the Ka’ba.” (18) When Togril, one of the earliest leaders of the Seljuks, visited the Kaaba, the Caliph praised him as the “Pillar of the Faith (rukn al-din)”. Togril’s elder brother and co-ruler, Chaghri Beg, gave himself the divine title of Malik al-muluk (King of kings). (19) The hatred exhibited by the Seljuk and Hun Turks towards Christians was also harbored by another Turkic people, the original Turks, the Mongols. For one hundred years after the death of Genghis Khan, the Mongolians terrorized Europe. (20) There is a story that reveals the antichrist spirit of the Mongol Turks. A Russian prince named Michael came to submit to the Mongolian ruler, Batu Khan, the Mongolians told him to bow down south to worship the spirit of Genghis Kahn, just as the Antichrist will do in the future. Michael told the Mongolians that he would rather die than do such a thing. One of the Mongolians trampled on Michael’s chest, and as he was going through this torture, he looked to one of his Christian soldiers and said: “Be strong because your punishment will not last long and then at once eternal joy will follow.” They took Michael and decapitated him, they then took his soldier and beheaded him as well, (21) fulfilling what John foresaw:And I saw seats; and they sat upon them; and judgment was given unto them; and the souls of them that were beheaded for the testimony of Jesus, and for the word of God, and who had not adored the beast nor his image, nor received his character on their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. (Revelation 20:4)The prophecies of persecution were not made solely for isolated events in the future, but for all of Christian history. The Mongol Turks killed Christians, the Muslim Turks killed Christians, and the future Turkish Ottoman empire will as well slaughter Christians for the Antichrist.The Mongolians invaded Russia and annihilated the Christians in Kiev. An Italian friar, Giovanni DiPlano Carpini, who was sent by Pope Innocent IV in 1245 to observe the Mongols, entered the city of Kiev and witnessed the horrifying aftermath of the genocide:“They destroyed citifies and castles and killed men and besieged Kiev, which is the greatest Russian city, and after a long siege they took Kiev and killed the townspeople, so when we went through that country we found countless human skulls and bones from the dead scattered over the field. Indeed Kiev had been a very great and populous city but now is reduced to almost nothing. In fact, there are hardly two hundred houses there now and the people are held in the strictest servitude. Carrying the war from there, the Tartars [Mongols] destroyed all of Russia.” (22) The Mongolians took numerous Russian princes, or Knyazes, placed them under a board and ate dinner on top of them as they suffocated to death. It is no wonder that the Russians called the Mongols, “shedders of Christian blood.” When the Mongolians invaded the Russian town of Volodimir, the Christians fled to the Church of the Holy Mother of God. The pagan Mongols broke “down the doors, piled up wood and set fire to the sacred church; and slew all, thus they perished, giving up their souls to God.” (23) After the Mongolians invaded Moscow, Perevaslavl, Yurev, Dmitrov, Volok, and Tver, they invaded Torkhok, “slew all from the male sex even to the female, all the priests and the monks,” (24) just like the Huns and the Muslim Turks. What is most interesting is that after the Mongolian invasion, in the year 1380, the Mongolians returned to Russia to completely vanquish it. But this time these Mongolians were not shamanists, but Muslims, led by the commander of the Blue Hoard, Mamai. And unlike before, the Russians were not utterly pillaged and plundered, but stood their ground in the profound Battle of Kulikovo. When the Mongols were pagans, they wanted Russia, and when they were Muslims, they wanted Russia. Regardless if they were pagan or Muslim, the Turks wanted Russia, and the whole of Christendom. It will be the same in the future, with a revived Ottoman Turkey fighting to destroy Christian Russia. Mongolian artThe Mongolians were not some sudden plunderers who would come and start scuffles, they were an empire, and not just that, they formed the largest empire in history. Their trail of blood and gore went from Central Asia all the way to Western Europe. They wanted to take Europe just as the Muslims wanted Europe. When they struck Europe, they, in the words of Matthew Paris, “came with the force of lightening into the territories of the Christians, laying waste the country, committing great slaughter, and striking inexpressible terror and alarm into every one.” Paris also described how the Mongols “struck great fear and terror into all Christendom. Already had they, with unheard-of tyranny, in a great measure reduced to a desert the countries of Friesland, Gothland, Poland, Bohemia, and both divisions of Hungary, slaying or putting to flight princes, prelates, citizens and rustics.” (25)The seriousness of the Mongol invasion was so prodigious that the Emperor Frederic wrote to the king of England, that:“We cannot be silent on a matter which concerns not only the Roman empire, whose office it is to propagate the Gospel, but also all the kingdoms of the world.” The same letter speaks of how when the Mongols invaded Hungary, they “slew the prelates and nobles of the kingdom who opposed them, and massacred such a host of the Hungarians, that a similar slaughter was never remembered to have taken place in one battle, from the most remote period.” The letter also speaks of how the Mongolians invaded Catholic Poland, and how “that country has been devastated by them.” (26) In a letter addressed the Archbishop of Bordeaux, it states that “Experience alone shows what great danger threatens the Christians through the invasion of the Tartars [Mongols].” (27)The horrific brutality inflicted by the Mongol reminds me of how Pope Urban II described the Seljuk Turks. He spoke of how they invaded the lands of the Christians and "depopulated them by the sword, pillage and fire;" how they "destroy the altars, after having defiled them with their uncleanness. They circumcise the Christians, and the blood of the circumcision they either spread upon the altars or pour into the vases of the baptismal font. When they wish to torture people by a base death, they perforate their navels, and dragging forth the extremity of the intestines, bind it to a stake; then with flogging they lead the victim around until the viscera having gushed forth the victim falls prostrate upon the ground. Others they compel to extend their necks and then, attacking them with naked swords, attempting to cut through the neck with a single blow. What shall I say of the abominable rape of the women? To speak of it is worse than to be silent." (28)Portrait of pagan Turkic Mongols, in their shamanist ritualThe Mongolians were said to have styled their hair in the shape of the crescent moon on their foreheads -- the mark of Antichrist -- they also braided their hair, as what the Muslim warriors themselves did. As the scholar, C. de Bridia, wrote:“On the foreheads, however, they wear their hair in a crescent-shaped fringe reaching to the eyebrows, but gather up the remaining hair, and arrange and braid it like the Saracens [Muslims].” (29) As the Seljuk and Ottoman Turks wanted Christendom to submit to the Muslim Caliph and the Sultan of their Islamic Turkish empire, the Mongol Turks wanted Christendom to submit to their khans or emperors. As the Muslim Turk ruler, Chaghri, called himself “King of kings,” the Mongolian king, Guyuk Khan, called himself “The Power of God, the Emperor of all Men,” and the superscription over his seal said: “God in Heaven and Cuyuc [Guyuk] over the Earth, the Power of God, the Seal of the Emperor of all Men”. Reminiscently, the Muslim Turkish Caliph calls himself, "Khalifa-t Allah," or "the Inheritor of Allah on earth." This is reminiscent to some of the other extolling appellations that Seljuk rulers would uphold on themselves. For example, in a decree ordered by the Seljuk sultan, Malik-Shah, it reads:“the Exalted and Almighty [Divine] Presence chose me from all of humanity for being a padshah, and made me a vicegerent (khalifa) in ruling over the world.” (30) In fact, the Seljuks, like the Mongolians, believed that it was their divine destiny to rule the earth. It is said that Saljuk, the father of the Seljukians, had a dream in which he urinated fire, and sparks flew from the flames and spread east and west. Saljuk consulted a mu’abbir, or dream interpreter, and he told him what the dream signified: the Seljuks were “destined to rule over the whole Earth.” (31) With this sense of destiny of universal empire, the Seljuks invaded Christendom, conquering most of Christian Anatolia, and almost took Constantinople if it were not for the Catholic Crusaders who struck them in the late eleventh century. As Saljuk had a dream interpreter tell him of a divine destiny for world empire, Genghis Khan was also told by an interpreter of dreams, only this time it was the interpreter who had the dream. In a Mongolian text it says:But a sign from Heaven came to me in a dreamand told me that Temujin [Genghis Khan] was meant to be our leader.In this dream I saw a great cow enter our camp.First she circled Jamugha,then she charged at his tent,then charged at Jamugha himself,striking him with her head and breaking one of her horns.'Bring me my horn!' she cried to him,'Bring me my horn!'bellowing at him as she stood therekicking up dustclouds with her hooves,with one crooked horn on her head.Then an ox with no horns at allpulled up the tent stake and harnessed himself to the cart.He drew away Jamugha's cart and began bellowing,'Heaven and earth have agreedthat Temujin should be Lord of the Nation.' (32) The Mongolians, the Altaic brothers of the Seljuks, demanded that Christendom, the Pope -- the vicegerent of Christ -- and the Catholic Church submit to the khan or emperor, an antichrist and vicegerent of the devil. Carpini, the Italian friar who stayed with the Mongolians to learn more about them in order to help prepare Christendom to fight these heathens, wrote this warning:“Therefore, because except for Christendom, there is no land in the world which they have not taken, they are preparing to fight us. Everyone should know that we lived at the Tartar court where there had been convened a solemn counsel at which it has been decided for many years (we were there when they elected Cuyuc emperor in our presence, who is called Khan in their language) which aforesaid Cuyuc Khan raised his standard along with those of all his princes, against the Church of God and the Roman Empire, and against all the states of Christendom and the people of the West, unless they do what he has ordered of the Lord Pope and the great men anf the whole population of the Western Christians.” (33) This reminds me of what Alp Arslan, the Seljukian sultan who enabled the Turks to vanquish Anatolia, proclaimed to his men after the Battle of Manzikert in 1071:"Henceforth all of you be like lion cubs and eagle young, racing through the countryside day and night, slaying the Christians and not sparing any mercy on the Roman nation." (34) Portrait of Alp ArslanThis strong sense of being divinely destined to conquer and rule the earth amongst the Mongol Turks, was recorded by C. de Bridia, when he wrote of how Genghis Khan ordained that the Mongols “should conquer every country in the world and make peace with none unless they surrendered unconditionally and without treaty, and even then he ordered that all of nobler rank should be slain and only plebeians be spared.” (35) So, the Seljukian Turks, the Hun Turks and the Mongol Turks, all hated Christians and warred against Christendom. Let us look to some more peoples who would, conventionally, not be considered Turks: the Japanese. The Mongolians, just like the Japanese, worshipped their emperors, especially Genghis Khan, whose spirit they worshipped after his death. This apotheosis of Genghis was written of by C. de Bridia in his study on the Tatars:“They place before the station of every Khan an idol which they first made in the image of Chingis Khan, and offer it gifts.” (36)The Mongols made an image of this beast, Genghis Khan.In one correspondence contemporaneous with the Mongol invasions, it describes how the Mongols “have for their lord one, whom they worship and reverence with all obedience, and whom they call god on earth.” (37) The chronicler Matthew Paris recounted how the Mongolians were “thirsting after and drinking blood, and tearing and devouring the flesh of dogs and human beings;” (38) and in the letter addressed to the Archbishop of Bordeaux, it recollects how when the Mongolians invaded Austria, “Virgins were deflowered until they died of exhaustion. Then their breasts were cut off to be dainties for their chiefs, and their bodies furnished a jovial banquet to savages.” (39)Rape and cannibalism was done by the Japanese at a mass level when they invaded and pillaged China. During their conquest of Nanking, Japanese soldiers would cut off the genitalia of Chinese men because there was a high demand for human penises, since it was believed amongst the Japanese that the human phallus would provide virility once consumed. Iris Chang documented this absolutely diabolical evil:“One Japanese reporter who later investigated the Rape of Nanking learned that at least one Japanese soldier tore the heart and liver out of a Chinese victim to eat them. Even genitals, apparently, were consumed: a Chinese solider who escaped from Japanese custody saw several dead people in the streets with their penises cut off. He was later told that the penises were sold to Japanese customers who believed that eating them would increase virility.” (40) Like their Mongol and Seljuk brethren before them, the Japanese raped women to death and did innumerable inhumanities and violations. “Every day, twenty-four hours a day,” reported the Dagong Daily newspaper, “there was not one hour when an innocent woman was not being dragged off somewhere by a Japanese soldier.” Even elderly women were sodomized by the Japanese soldiers; grandmothers and even great-grandmothers could not escape the reprobate clutches of the savages. One Japanese soldier raped a sixty year old woman, and then he was ordered to “clean the penis by her mouth.” One sixty-two year old woman, surrounded by soldiers, protested that she was too old for sex, and the heathen Japanese “rammed a stick up her instead.” Many eighty year old women were raped, so much so that they were ravished to death. Pregnant women were also raped, or women who had just given birth a few days prior. Japanese soldiers would also rip open the bellies of pregnant women and tear out the unborn children for their own sadistic entertainment.Carnage in Nanking Japanese soldiers bayoneting victimThere are countless stories of horror from which one can learn about the absolute diabolism of the Japanese. There is the story of a slaughter of an entire household, which took place on December 13, 1937. Thirty Japanese soldiers approached a home, shot the landlord dead as soon as he opened the door, and entered. The landlord’s wife asked why they killed her husband, they looked at her, and shot her dead as well. They spotted a woman, Mrs. Hsia, hiding under a table holding her baby. The Japanese soldiers gripped her and dragged from away from underneath the table, stripped her naked and gang raped her. They then bayoneted her through the chest and shoved a bottle of perfume into her vagina. After this, they took her baby and pierced the infant’s body with the blade of a bayonet. They continued to walk within the home. They entered one room and saw Mrs Hsia’s parents and her two teenage daughters, ages 16 and 14. The grandmother desperately tried to shield the two girls; the Japanese shot her dead with a revolver. The grandfather held onto the body of his wife, and the soldiers swiftly slew him. They took the two girls, denuded them, and several soldiers took turns raping them. Afterwards, they took a bamboo stick and shoved it inside the older girl’s vagina, and the other girl they bayoneted to death. They continued to walk about the house, they spotted two children, ages 4 and 2, who belonged to the landlord. They seized the younger child and split his head in two with a sword, and the other they bayoneted to death. Before they left they spotted an eight year old girl, a daughter of the landlords. They bayoneted her and she was left for dead. The Japanese left the home, to continue their creation of an ocean of gore and carnage. The eight year old girl, now injured, hid in the home with her four year old sister. The four year old was hiding under the covers during the massacre, and almost suffocated. Weeks after the massacre, a member of the International Committee entered the home, spotted the two children — who were living off rice crusts — and all of the aftermath of the butchery. “While I was there,” he later testified, “the blood on the table [was] not all dry yet.” (41)The Japanese, like the Seljuks and the Mongolians, believed that they were divinely destined to rule the earth. Shimizu Ryuzan, former president of Rissho University, said in 1934:“The underlying principle of the spirit of Japan is the enlightenment of the world with truth. Just as our bother Manchurians have come to follow us with affection, so also must we lead all the nations of the world into righteousness and establish heaven on earth, where brotherly love and worldwide peace shall prevail and where all men shall be Buddhist saints. This is the true ideal of the spirit of Japan.” (42)In 1946, Narahashi Wataru, chief cabinet secretary in the government of Prime Minister Shidehara Kijuro, explained the Allied position on Japanese ideology and how it pushed Japan to war:Because the Japanese people believed the emperor to be a god, they calmly died on his behalf, crying out, “May the emperor live for ten thousand years!” Claiming that it had to make the August Virtue of His Majesty shine throughout the world, Japan adopted [the slogan of] “the eight corners of the world under one roof” and committed aggression. (43)Just as the Mongolians wanted the world to worship Genghis Khan, and all of their other khans, and as the Seljuks wanted the world to bow down towards Mecca and to revere the sultans, so the Japanese wanted all of humanity to bow down towards the emperor. The Japanese worship the sun goddess, Amaterasu, even till this day. They even carry up a little tabernacle, called a mikoshi, in which they believe a deity lives. On top of the false tabernacle is placed an idol of a bird, which looks like a cherubim from the Near East, which obviously represents a demon, or fallen angel.The Mongolians were as well very devout to sun worship. In an ancient Mongolian text, it reads of how Temujin (Genghis Khan) bowed down to the sun:"Temujin turned toward the Sun and took his hat in his hand.He loosened his belt and threw it over his neck.Then striking his breast with his hand,he knelt nine times to the Sun,sprinkling offerings of mare's milk in the air,and he prayed." (44)And just like the Mongols and the Seljuks, and the Huns, the Japanese hated Christianity, and believed that their war was a divine mission to not only have everyone submit to their emperor, but to also destroy Christianity. For example, Ouchi Seiran, a very reputable Japanese Buddhist scholar, in a work published in 1912, wrote:“Christianity and our imperial house can never coexist, for it is impossible to truly revere the imperial house while believing in Christianity. …Christianity not only turns its back on the righteous Buddhist teaching of cause and effect, but it is a heretical teaching that tears apart the establishment of our imperial house and destroys the foundation of our country. …Therefore we must all join together to prevent this heretical teaching from spreading throughout our land.” (45) The antichrist spirit of the pagan Japanese was most definitely manifested in their genocides. In the words of Iris Chang, “The Japanese attacked women in nunneries, churches, and Bible training schools. Seventeen soldiers raped one woman in succession in a seminary compound.” (46) For six weeks the Japanese set fires to Nanking, and one of their particular targets were churches, setting them to flames. (47) Raping women in churches, and destroying churches, was what was committed by the Ottoman Turks and their Islamized European auxiliaries when they invaded Constantinople. The Turks flooded the Church of the Hagia Sofia where they raped women and took Christians to be their slaves. The loveliest maiden was sought out by the most degenerate Turk, and not even the nuns were spared by the rapacious Muslims who indulged themselves in the wickedest acts of rape and kidnapping. The braids of women were tugged and pulled by Turks who competed for them; they ripped through their garments and exposed their breasts and bosoms. People were driven out of the church and flogged, and within one hour all of the men where bounded together by a cord like the Hebrew slaves in ancient Egypt. They were chained together and were treated as though they were not human, but a herd of beasts. Over sixty thousand people were transported to the Muslim camps and ships, exchanged and sold, and dispersed throughout the provinces of the Ottoman Empire. (48) The Janissaries tore down the crucifix in the Hagia Sofia, placed a Turkish turbin on the thorn-pierced head and mockingly paraded through the streets as they scoffingly said, "Behold the God of the Christians." Ever since then the Hagia Sofia has never been touched by Christian hands; it still remains in Turkey as a great bare slab in iconoclastic fury. (49)Spiritual deception was utilized by both the Turks and even the Japanese in their invasions of Christian countries. For example, a few years after the Turks invaded Constantinople in 1453, they brought in a new bishop named Gennadius to be the patriarch of the church in Constantinople, and each year, the Ottoman approved patriarch would have dialogues with the sultan on the similarities between Islam and Christianity. The Japanese also used spiritual deception to bring their Catholic subjects into submission. When the Japanese invaded and conquered the Mariana Islands, including Guam, they understood that it would have been difficult to get the locals — called Chamorros — who were Catholics, to submit to the cult of the emperor. The Japanese invaded Guam on December 8th, 1941, the day of the Feast of the Immaculate Conception. The people were getting ready to partake in the celebration, when Japanese bombs struck the land. Bishop Miguel Olano, after finishing the Mass in his city of Hagatna, told everyone in the congregation to evacuate the city as soon as they could. In the early hours of December 10th, six thousand Japanese troops covered the beaches of Guam. The Japanese authorities declared as a message to the Christian locals of Guam that they conquered their island “for the purpose of restoring liberty and rescuing the whole Asiatic people and creating the permanent peace in Asia. Thus our intention is to establish the New Order of the World.” All churches in Guam were confiscated and declared as Japanese property.Bishop Miguel OlanoThe Japanese took the Cathedral in Hagatna, they committed an abomination of desolation, where the wheat offering is expelled, and forced the Catholic Sacraments to be removed, and transformed it into a prison for American civilians, and then later on into a distribution center for Japanese propaganda and a dance and entertainment hall. The Japanese also took over the Baptist Church in Hagatna and made it into a Shinto shrine. All American Catholic priests in Guam were arrested and imprisoned in the Cathedral, and the Spanish bishop, Angel Olano Urteaga, was as well confined behind bars. After the Japanese did this, there were only two Catholic priests left in the whole island — Fr. Oscar Lujan Calvo and Fr. Jesus Baza Duenas — to minister to 21,000 Catholics. There was also the sole Baptist minster in Guam, Reverend Joaquin Flores Sablan. Fr. Jesus was the older priest, and because of his tough exterior and indomitable spirit, he was called the “Lone Ranger.”Fr. Oscar Lujan Calvo (left) and Fr. Jesus Baza DuenasOne day the Japanese governor of Guam, Homura Teiichi, told the two Catholic priests and the Baptist pastor to discourage the people from celebrating the Catholic feast days, since the war — according to him — could have forced the populace to starve. The Baptist minister and the younger priest agreed to these demands, but Fr. Jesus refused to do this, exclaiming that it was in hardship where the Catholics could exhibit their true love and faith. The governor was so furious that it appeared that he was about to unsheathe his Samurai sword and decapitate Fr. Jesus. In a different meeting, governor Homura told the Baptist minister, Sabalan, that the Japanese had come to destroy any trace of American culture in Guam, and that included him and his church. The Japanese knew that they needed to create a synchronism between Catholicism and Shintoism, in order to have the Chamorros bow down to their emperor. They created a very strict law for both the Catholic and Baptist services, that before each church service, the congregation had to bow down towards the emperor, the image of the beast and an antichrist on earth. To help keep this enforced, Japan sent two of their Catholic priests, Monsignor Dominic Fukahori and Fr. Petero Komatsu. Fukahori used the pulpit to convey Japanese propaganda during the homily, praising “the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere which Japan was attempting to build during World War II and extol the glories of the Emperor.” Petero Komatsu Monsignor FukahoriHe would also declare that Japan was defeating the Americans in the war. To the majority of Guam’s Catholics, and to the two sole priests, these priests from Japan were spies who could not be trusted. While Fr. Jesus was not present in his perish, Monsignor Fukahori and Fr. Komatsu tried to convince the Catholics in the church that Japan was already victorious in the war, and that if they would cooperate with the regime of the emperor, Japan would bring peace and harmony to Guam. Once Fr. Jesus was aware of these evil wolves, he wrote a letter to Fukahori, calling him a spy for the Japanese military, and, referencing Pope Benedict XV, affirmed that it was contrary to the Faith for a priest to work in a nation while at the same time advancing the agenda of a foreign country. In 1944, the Americans fought the Japanese in Guam, and the Japanese in turn forced the locals to be slaves in the fields, to help feed the Japanese forces, carry supplies and munitions and build defenses. Fr. Jesus explicitly ordered that Catholics disobey the Japanese. Fr. Jesus, and other Catholics, were helping an American radioman, George Tweed, clothing and hiding him from the Japanese who were viciously trying to kill him. One of the Japanese priests told Fr. Jesus to stop ministering to the Chamorros alone. Fr. Jesus told the heretic that he only answered to God, and the Japanese race was not God nor divine. Fr. Jesus, along perhaps hundreds of other Catholics, were arrested. The Japanese tortured the priest and the Catholic prisoners, demanding from them to reveal where the American radioman was hidden. As Fr. Jesus endured torture, the Americans were rescuing George Tweed. Fr. Jesus never talked, regardless of all of the tortures they put him through. Fr. Jesus’ last words were: “God will look after me. I have done no wrong.” After he said this, his neck was struck by the Samurai sword, and he was beheaded, on July 11th, 1944. He was an Elijah, defying the tyranny of false priests, striking at the enemy with the Sword of the Spirit, and in emulation of the Incarnation of Hope, allowed himself to carry the Cross with Christ, and brought vision to mankind on the ascendency of humility over the guile of despots and the despotism of delusion. As martyrs were made under the oppressions of the heathen, so will many more continue leave the finite existence of the world, and enter eternity. The war has never stopped, between the saint and the slaves of the diabolical, between civilization and tyranny, between Christendom and savagery, sanguinary bloodlust that will be seen by horrified witnesses in the face of oceans of blood spilt by the restored empire of the Turk. It is true that the people of Turkey are, for the most part, not really Turks, but Greeks, Slavs and Circassians whose ancestors were forced into Islam by the Turks in the past, and who were brainwashed into zealously accepting the race of their conquerers. But the concept of "the Turk," has become, for people in Turkey, more of an ideology than a race. Ottomanism is an ideology that glorifies a race, and it is subscribed to by a people not even of that race, but who nonetheless are willing to kill for its ideology. The ideology is world conquest under the spirit of antichrist, and the means by which to do it, is to use the very people that you want conquered to do the conquering for you. It is a curse, a curse only broken by Christianity. As it was in the past, so shall it be in the future, with the Cross of Christendom, crushing the crescent of the Turk.REFERENCES(1) Gregory, History of the Franks, 2.16, trans. Thorpe(2) That the Turks are Huns, see John Skylitzes, Byzantine History, 21.9. Michael Attaleiates calls the Seljuks "Nephthalite Huns" (History, 8.1; 14.1)* (2a)*Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 1, pp. 9, 10(3) See the Chronicle of Pseudo-Joshua, 60, 279, alongside the notes by the translators, Frank R. Trombley and John W. Watt(4) Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 1, p. 11(5) For more on the Seljuks, see Belloc, The Crusades, ch. ii, pp. 9-11; The Great Heresies, The Great and Enduring Heresy of Muhammad, p. 50; Moczar, Islam at the Gates, prologue, act 3, p. 19; Mills, Hist. Crus. ch. i, p. 2; Nicolle, Manzikert 1071, ch. 1, pp. 8, 12(6) See Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 1, p. 16(7) See Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 1, p. 16(8) Michael Attaleiates, History, 14.1(9) See Michael Attaleiates, History, 8.2-3(10) In John France, "Impelled by the Love of God", in Thomas F. Madden's The Crusades, part 2, p. 35(11) See Gibbon, Decline and Fall, vol. v, ch. lvii, pp. 1034-1036(12) Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 1, pp. 25-26(13) Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 1, p. 43(14) Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 1, p. 43(15) Belloc, The Crusades, ch. 2, p. 10, ellipses mine(16) Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 1, p. 35 (17) See Itzkowitz, Ottoman Empire and Islamic Tradition, ch. 1, p. 4 (18) Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 1, p. 30(19) Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 1, p. 30(20) McCullough, Chronicles of the Barbarians, ch. 13, p. 269 (21) Carpini, The Story of the Mongols, ch. 3, pp. 43-44 (22) Carpini, The Story of the Mongols, ch. 5, p. 68(23) See the Chronicle of Novgorod, ed. McCullough, ch. 13, pp. 286-287 (24) Ibid(25) Matthew Paris, Chronicles, ed. McCullough, ch. 13, p. 291(26) See Matthew Paris, Chronicles, ed. McCullough, ch. 13, pp. 293-294(27) Matthew Paris, Chronicles, ed. McCullough, ch. 13, p. 296(28) Pope Urban II at the Council of Clermont, the version of Robert the Monk, in Edward Peters, The First Crusade, p. 2(29) C. de Bridia, The Tatar Relation, ed. McCullough, ch. 13, p. 276(30) See Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 2, pp. 61-62(31) See Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 2, p. 18(32) The Secret History of the Mongols, pp. 47-48, ed. Paul Khan(33) Carpini, The Story of the Mongols, ch. 8, pp. 85-86(34) Nicolle, Manzikert 1071, p. 92(35) C. de Bridia, The Tartar Relation, ed. McCullough, ch. 13, p. 278 (36) C. de Bridia, The Tatar Relation, ed. McCullough, ch. 13, p. 277 (37) See McCullough, Chronicles of the Barbarians, ch. 13, p. 294(38) Matthew Paris, Chronicles, ed. McCullough, ch. 13, p. 290 2(39) Matthew Paris, Chronicles, ed. McCullough, ch. 13, p. 297(40) Iris Chang, The Rape of Nanking, ch.4, pp. 88-89(41) Iris Chang, The Rape of Nanking, ch. 4, pp. 92-93(42) Shimizu, Rissho Ankoku no Taigi to Nippon Seishin, p. 46, in Victoria, Zen At War, ch. 5, p. 64(43) Quoted in Tamaki Benkichi, Kaiso — Yamamoto Tempo, p. 156, in Victoria, Zen War Stories, ch. 6, p. 100(44) The Secret History of the Mongols, p. 34, ed. Paul Khan(45) Akiyama, Sonno Aikoku Ron, pp. 49-52, in Victoria, Zen at War, ch. 4, 52(46) Iris Chang, The Rape of Nanking, ch. 4, pp. 90-91 (47) See Iris Chang, The Rape of Nanking, ch. 7, p. 160(48) See Gibbon, Decline and Fall, vol. v, ch. liviii (49) Carroll, A History of Christendom, vol. iii, ch. xiii, p. 568 print anonymous armageddon isis islam war Make No Mistake About It, There Is Going To Be A Great World War Between Christendom And The Turkish Armies Of The Antichrist By Theodore Shoebat In the history of Christendom, there is this continuous fight, between the crusaders and the Turk. From the early M... Read More...» Newer Posts Older Posts Home Subscribe to: Posts (Atom) Top
How's That "Integration" Coming? New Vest-Clad And Burka-Wearing Shariah Patrols Spotted Walking, Driving Around With Islamic Flags Patrolling The Streets Of More European Cities 0 One of the Shariah patrols, coming to a city near youSo, how goes those new Muslims arrivals?My only questions at this point is- are they being taxpayer funded? As we pointed out in a recent video, the European governments are set on promoting Islam to the suicidal destruction of their own people. Since we know that as we speak right now Muslims are being trained as soldiers at taxpayer expense, it is only logical that Muslim police patrols come sooner:Eyewitnesses reported seeing three people wearing burkas and black gloves driving around Hamb_urg's Wandsbek district in a black VW.They said a sticker with an Islamic logo and the words Sharia Police was fastened to the car's bonnet.There were also reports of another incident in the Dammtor area of Hamb_urg where witnesses claim to have seen five to seven masked people sitting in a van.Islamic and ISIS symbols were said to be hanging from the vehicles rear-view mirrors.The sighting were similar to incidents reported in thew city of Wuppertal near Düsseld_orf where a group of people who wore vests with the words 'Sharia Police' urged passersby to stop drinking alcohol and refrain from gambling to ensure strict Islamic moral laws were being observed.Police and politicians said they were unaware of the latest reports but a local councillor said the authorities needed to keep close eye on the situation to ensure the incidents were not repeated. (source)Of course the police are going to do nothing- they are under orders not to do anything for fear of losing their jobs and being prosecuted.And that is the problem, right there. With no Christian Faith to give the European people meaning and purpose in life, their ability to defend themselves and assert their identity has been completely stripped. Weak, vulnerable, confused and without an identity, they derive their worth from social self-identification by those in power. And should those men in power find it to determine the extinction of their own people, these same men entrusted with protecting society will stand down and permit for the extinction to happen because they derive their identity from those same power brokers.As I have said before, Islam and Muslims are very weak- they do not so much invade, but move into power vacuums created by apostasy. That is what Islam is doing here and why nobody is stopping it, and why it will not be stopped until they rediscover the only Faith which ever combated successfully against Islam. anonymous armageddon isis islam war How's That "Integration" Coming? New Vest-Clad And Burka-Wearing Shariah Patrols Spotted Walking, Driving Around With Islamic Flags Patrolling The Streets Of More European Cities One of the Shariah patrols, coming to a city near you So, how goes those new Muslims arrivals? My only questions at this point is- are... Read More...»
Remember That Program Where The Swedish Government Paid Swedish Children To Spend Time With Muslims- Did The Swedish Government Just Cover Up A Gang Rape Directly Caused By That Program? 0 Muslims in Malmo, Sweden, one of Sweden's most heavily Muslim areasEarlier this month we wrote about a new program from the Swedish government to promote "multiculturalism." Basically, the Swedish government started paying Swedish children and teens to spend time with Muslims with the goal of helping them learn about Swedish culture and integrate into society. While we said this would be about as successful as trying to evenly mix oil into water and the end result would be even more rapes and disorder- as though Sweden did not have enough, since it is the "rape capitol" of Europe- the government insisted.In this most recent case of a brutal gang rape of a Swedish teen girl by migr_ants, it is interesting to not two things- the girl knew all of the Muslims in question, they were friends (apparently rather recently), but further details of how they met are not being disclosed. This is very odd, since this is usually one of the first things discussed.The fact that this woman is a (a) teenager, (b) is friends with these Muslim refug_eees, and (c) how they met is being kept very quiet leads me to ask- Did these people meet through one of these government programs?If so, it might be one of the first recorded cases where the Swedish government directly facilitated the rape of one of its own by Muslims:According to documents from the court that Free Times noted there was a rape, as many of the ref_ugee children attended, on Wednesday, just over two weeks ago.Aftonbladet writes that the assault was carried out against a woman in connection with a party.Ref_ugee children suspected for at least another three rapes and sexual molestation.Two of rape should have taken place on Friday and Saturday, 22 and 23 July.They are women over 15 years and, according to media reports acquainted with the refu_gees already. Of trial documents shows that there are at least two victims. (source)...The suspected crimes have been made against two people, according to the documents, and according to the police is a matter of women.Regarding the event, classified as aggravated rape, four young people, guys, been arrested - but released after a decision by the prosecutor referring to the suspects age.- There have been four detainees where arrest has been lifted, says chief prosecutor Pernilla Åström in Southern Skåne Public Prosecution.According to documents from Lund District Court is the suspected youth of 15-17 years old.- Criminal suspicions against them remain, says Robert Loeffel, press officer at the police in Region South."Is an acquaintance"Police said there is no question of any rapes. According to Aftonbladet, at least one rape in which several offenders were involved occurred in connection with a party.- There is a causal relationship between suspected perpetrators and the victims, but I can not say much more, says Robert Loeffel.The suspected perpetrators defense lawyers say their clients deny the charges.- He denies the crime. That he has been released may well have to do with many factors, but above all I think of age. It requires a great deal in order to detain someone who is so young, says Rasmus Loven lawyer representing one of the younger guys. (source) anonymous armageddon isis islam war Remember That Program Where The Swedish Government Paid Swedish Children To Spend Time With Muslims- Did The Swedish Government Just Cover Up A Gang Rape Directly Caused By That Program? Muslims in Malmo, Sweden, one of Sweden's most heavily Muslim areas Earlier this month we wrote about a new program from the Swedis... Read More...»
Make No Mistake About It, There Is Going To Be A Great World War Between Christendom And The Turkish Armies Of The Antichrist 0 By Theodore ShoebatIn the history of Christendom, there is this continuous fight, between the crusaders and the Turk. From the early Middle Ages onwards, this struggle between the Christians and the Turks has been taking place, and will continue to transpire until Kingdom Come. It does not matter what false religion they believe in, be it Islam or paganism, the Turk will always be a menace to civilization. Let us start with the Huns. The Huns were part of the Turkic peoples, and they invaded Europe and slaughtered the Christians with the edge of the sword. Not only this, but they specifically targeted priests and butchered them in front of their altars. St. Gregory of Tours provides us with a most graphic description of this sanguinary vanquishment when the Huns invaded France:“The Huns migrated from Pannonia and laid waste the countryside as they advanced. They came to the town of Metz, so people say, on Easter Eve. They burned the town to the ground, slaughtered the populace with the sharp edge of their swords and killed the priests of the Lord in front of their holy altars.” (1) This is exactly the type of violence that would be perpetrated by the later Muslim Huns, that is, the Islamic Turks (2), the Seljukians and other Central Asian Turks, and their later successors of Islamic empire, the Ottomans. The Turks who migrated to the Near East were the Oghuz, a confederation of twenty Turkic tribes from Central Asia, who arrived to the Iranian plateau, for the purpose of plunder. (2a)Mongolians, the original Turks When they first entered the region the Turks were not Islamic; many of the Turks were Buddhists and Shamanists, and there would also be a small minority of Nestorians in their midst. These people did not appear as those who are living in modern day Turkey. These Turks were the originals, fierce warriors who fought with devastating and formidable force on the backs of their horses, with great dexterity with the bow and arrow, cutting angles in their battle formations and instilling in all their enemies a great feeling of fear and consternation.They were slanted eyed, Altaic peoples, and did not look like the people of modern day Turkey, who are, for the most part, Islamized Greeks and Eastern Europeans who were conquered by Turks from the Middle Ages onwards to the modern era, and brainwashed into taking the identity of their Altaic conquerers. The Turks who migrated to the Near East in the eighth century came from the Orkhon and Selenga valleys of Mongolia. Ibn al-Athir made mention of how “Some Khurasani historians have mentioned that these Oghuz came over to Transoxiana from the regions of the marches which are the remotest Turkish lands during the reign of the Caliph al-Mahdi (775-85 AD).” Transoxiana is where Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, southern Kyrgyzstan and southwest Kazakhstan are located today, and it is where much of today’s Turks live. The famous Arab traveler, Ibn Fadlan, spoke of an Oghuz presence in the Khwarezm region, which lies in Central Asia. The Khwarezm were just as vitriolic as their Turkic predecessors, the Huns, slaughtering Christians and butchering priests in front of their altars, just as the Huns did. In the year 1244, an army of Khwarezm Muslim Turks, alongside a force of Egyptian warriors, invaded the Holy Land. They invaded Gaza and slaughtered five thousand Christians. They murdered the Master of the Templars and the Archbishop of Tyre, they took priests and stabbed them to death right in front of their altars as they screamed out, "let us pour their blood on the place where they poured out wine in commemoration of their crucified God.” The Huns were pagans, the Khwarezm Muslim, but both were Turks, and both exhibited an insatiable hatred for the Christian Faith.Seljukian art Ottoman Turk artMany battles were fought between the carriers of the Cross and the pagan Huns. In the early sixth century, the Persian king, Kawad, took a force of Huns to invade the Christian city of Edessa, in Syria. One reads the ancient record of the battle and feels a sense of awe as to how immense were the armies of the Persians and Huns. Kawad marched his armies from the Euphrates and arrived at Edessa, and so great were the numbers of the heathen; their camp reached from the areas of Mar Cosmas and Mar Damian, to the church of Mar Sergius and the village of Bekin, as far as the church of the Confessors, and the width of the heathen camp was said to have been as far as the descent of Serrin. The Persians and Huns surrounded the entire city of Edessa, and one could have witnessed, standing on the peaks of lofty hills, peering past the desert air, meeting the gaze of their determined Christian enemies. They were like locusts filled all places, an innumerable multitude of men (Judges 6:5). As wolves surround their prey, as hawks circle above creatures they desire to consume, the Persians and the Huns encircled the city. Areobindus was the defender of the Christian force; he led a strong and determined army, around 12,000 warriors, veterans of previous battles, hardened by the ways of the sanguinary frays. Their hands were ready to strike, their hearts prepared for combat and death. Some of the warriors rushed outside the city walls and the fight ensued. The Christians, with unsheathed weapons struck hard upon the enemy, their blade bespattered with Hunnic blood, with silver and crimson glimmering under the light of the white moon. As the battle went on, young men launched stones upon the pagans with catapults to repulse them away from the wall, and women rushed out to provide water for the fighters. Many a heathen fell dead, but not one Christian perished in that battle. The enemy fled to the village of Kubbe, and it is quite profound the behind them, on the walls of Edessa, it was written in Greek: “Christ God, he who hopes in you is never confounded.” (3) Byzantine Christians fighting with ArabsHere the Hun Turks allied with the Persians, in the Crusades, the Muslim Turks allied with the Persians to fight the Christians. Nothing changed from John's proclamation in Apocalypse 13, where the feet of the bear (Persia) unites with the "body of a leopard" (Turkey). Gog and Magog simply repeats itself until Kingdom Come (Ezekiel 38).When the Turkic pagans were in the Middle East, they did not immediately all convert to Islam. There were ongoing battles between Turks who had converted to Islam and other Turks who wanted to maintain their traditional religious beliefs. Ibn al-Athir reports on how, in the 11th century, ten thousand Turks had converted to Islam, and exclaims: “Allah thus eliminated their evil from being directed towards Muslims.” (4) The statement alludes to the violence that was being by the Turks before they converted to Islam. With or without Islam, the Turk was evil and bent on conquest and despotism. The tenth century treatise, Hudud al-alam, speaks of the violent expansionism of the Oghuz (or Ghuz) Turks, prior to their conversion to Islam:“The Ghuz have no towns, but the people owning felt-huts are very numerous. They possess arms and implements (silah va alat) and are courageous and daring (shukh) in war. They continually make inroads (ghazw) into the lands of Islam (nawahi-yi islam), whatever place be on the way (ba har ja’i uftadh), and [then] strike (bar-kuband), plunder, and retreat as quickly as possible.” The Oghuz Turks who converted to Islam were part of a branch of Turk called the Seljuk. These originated from a subbranch of Turkic people called the Qarakhanids, who initially were ruled by a Manichaean elite, but they also consisted of many Buddhists. The Qarakhanids conquered the area of Balasaghun in Kyrgyzstan, and it was after this, in the mid-tenth century, that they converted to Islam. From the Islamic Qarakhandids, came a fringe family who broke away from them, these were Seljuks, founded by Saljuk ibn Duqaq, and it was these Turks who would commence the first Turkish Islamic empire. (5) The reason behind Saljuk’s conversion to Islam was not sincere spiritual theological conviction, but rather it was to increase the forces of his tribe, and thus to aid his already insatiable thirst for domination and power. It is another evidence as to the way of the Turk: regardless of his religious convictions, he will be tyrant. Saljuq, according to the Syriac historian Bar Hebraeus, said:“If we do not enter the faith of the people of the country in which we desire [to live] and make a pact with them (or conform to their customs), no man will cleave to us, and we shall be a small and solitary people.” (6) After this was said, the Seljukians sent an envoy to the Khwarazm city of Zandak and requested that Islamic scholars be sent to them to teach them about Islam. The Muslims in Zandak sent to the Turks a Muslim missionary (or mubashshir). (7)The type of Islam that the Turks accepted, however, was not exactly the mechanical form of Sunni Islam that most Muslims follow, but the severely mystical Sufi Islam, which appealed to them more since it was quite paralleled to Buddhism. From Attila the Hun to the Muslims who massacred the Armenians, they brought nothing constructive, only death. Like the Huns, the Seljuks hated Christians and invaded Christendom. The Seljuks under Togril invaded and overtook significant regions of Georgia, they also seized Christian Mesopotamia, Melitene, Koloneia, and all of the regions adjacent to the Euphrates River. If it was not for the brave Romans who fought and died striving to defend their lands, the Turks would have reached all the way to the Christian lands of Galatia, Honorias, and Phrygia. (8) The Seljuks did not cease with their conquests and pillaging, but like the wolves they so revered, they continued their hunt for domination and their establishing of an Islamic empire. (9) They continued their Mongol strategies of battle, eventually coming to the territories of Christendom. Thus a writer of old Christendom, Matthew of Edessa, wrote of this brood of vipers:"In the beginning of the year a calamity proclaiming the fulfillment of divine portents befell the Christian adorers of the Holy Cross. The death-breathing dragon appeared, accompanied by a destroying fire, and struck the believers in the Holy Trinity. The apostolic and prophetic books trembled, for there arrived winged serpents come to vomit fire upon Christ's faithful… At this period there gathered the savage nation of infidels called Turks. Setting out, they entered [our] province and put the Christians to the sword. Facing the enemy, the Armenians saw these strange men, who were armed with bows and had a flowing hair like women." (10) With this said, surely were these the people of Antichrist who St. John saw when he wrote: "And they had hair as the hair of women, and their teeth were as the teeth of lions." (Revelation 9:8)And surely were these the people of whom St. John wrote: And the dragon was angry against the woman: and went to make war with the rest of her seed, who keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ. (Revelation 12:17) Seljuk archerThe Romans were suddenly attacked by this unknown race of barbarian, one more sinister, fierce and savage than the regular Muslims they were used to fighting. The Turkish horsemen overran a frontier of six hundred miles from Tauris to Arzeoum. With their endurance fit for the highest peaks of Asia, and their horses conditioned for the most fatiguing sprints of war, these Mongols shed the blood of a hundred and thirty thousand Christians for the appeasement of Allah. In the Persian city of Tus alone, the Seljuks massacred one hundred thousand people. When the Seljuks entered Nishapur, they immediately wanted to plunder. Their leader, Togril, prevented them from doing so because it was Ramadan, in which war is forbidden. His fellow tribesmen began to mock him, jokingly talking about how Togril all of a sudden made himself a religious authority to pass Islamic decrees. The Seljuks finally reached a compromise, that they could slaughter, rape and plunder after the Eid al-Fitr, or the end of Ramadan. “Grant them respite for the rest of this month,” said Togril, “after the [‘Id of] al-Fitr, do what you will (a’malu ma shi’tum ba’d al-fitr).” (12) The Turks, being Muslim, slaughtered other Muslims on Ramadan, revealing their priorities, and one of them was not Islam, but plunder and domination. When the Seljuks entered Halwan, they raped the women and “deflowered the virgins.” “Every beauty they came across,” says al-Katib al-Ishfahani, “they disfigured. Every fire they passed, they extinguished. Every house they passed, they dismantled. How many dams they broke, how much shame they left behind … Many kings escaped from their path, fearing the Turks … Every town they entered they subjugated the people. They ruled the towns through fear and terror.” (13) Bar Hebraeus wrote of the Turks: “In every place where his troops meet together they plunder, and destroy and kill.” (14)The Huns slaughtered, and they were not Muslim; the Seljuks slaughtered, and they were Muslim. I am not attempting to exempt Islam, but what I am arguing, is that the pagan Turkic peoples, being averse to Christianity, has, for centuries, been an enemy of Christianity. Even if they did not convert to Islam, they would still be a menace to Christendom, as is evidenced by the Huns and the Mongolian Empire. Seljuks were simply another part of the Mongolian expansionism that was taking place from the time of the rise of the Huns. As the historian Hilaire Belloc wrote:“It is remarkable that the Mongol hordes, from their first wave onward, had fitted in at once with the social structure and creed of Islam. … Their own bloody or absurd superstitions, barbaric as they were, without substance or philosophy or reason, yielded at once to the religious spirit of the society into which they came. They became not only Mohammedan, but fanatically Mohammedan, and through their military power what had already begun to be the decline of Mohammedanism recovered.” (15) if it were not for the Turk converting to Islam, and leaving his shamanistic religion, Islam would be nothing today, probably just a small sect like the Zoroastrians, written of in a few obscure books, and a footnote in some others. When the Arabs controlled Syria, Armenia, North Africa, Iraq, Arabia, Iran, and other lands of the East, they were not capable of controlling their provinces due to their lack of unity and military strength. The Arab would conquer a land only to lose it just as fast as he captured it. The intermixture of other peoples with the Arabs, on account of the conquests of Persia, the Berbers and other Asian tribes, diluted Arabian unity on which Islamic strength rested, and division sprung amongst the Muslims, for "iron cannot be mixed with clay." (Daniel 2:43) Hope was lost for the utopian vision of Muhammad, and it was believed that the Arab Islamic empire was finally about to crumble and allow the Christian Byzantine Empire to recover what it had lost from Muslim invasions. Until all of a sudden bands of Mongol hordes, experts in archery and cruelty, swiftly swarmed into the Middle East where they would find a religion that fit their savagery, Islam. By becoming Muslims, the Mongols, being stronger in body and more warlike than the Arab, reinvigorated the Islamic empire. By the eleventh century they would replace the Arabs in power, and with their sadism and destructive temperament, they ravaged, pillaged and massacred everywhere they went, dominating the central power of the Muslim world.Ottomans besiege Nicopolis, 1396Islam was founded by Arabs, but was nothing without the Mongol Turk, who was bent on expansionism and violence even before he discovered Islam, a religion that he would accept only to give spiritual sustenance to his sanguinary desires of empire. Togril once told the Caliph: “If I did not honor you, I would have destroyed all Baghdad with the edge of the sword.” (16) The Turk was going to do what a Turk did: slaughter, ravish and plunder. What kept him from annihilating much of the people was the common religion of Islam that he shared with the local Muslims, and notwithstanding this, the Turks still slaughtered Muslims for their own gain. After the Seljuks converted to Islam, they would become very loyal fighters and advancers for the cult of Muhammad. Muslim princes hired the Seljuks as mercenaries, and soon they emerged to become governors of provinces, and then from there they became rulers over entire regions. (17) as we read in one eleventh century letter, written by the Seljuks to the Caliph al-Qa’im Bi-Amr Allah:“We, the servants from the family of Saljuq, have been a perpetually obedient group, supporters of the state (dawlat) and obedient to Islam and helping it (mitwa’ wa mu’adid-i islam). We have always striven in waging war against the enemy and jihad, and have been assiduous in visiting the Ka’ba.” (18) When Togril, one of the earliest leaders of the Seljuks, visited the Kaaba, the Caliph praised him as the “Pillar of the Faith (rukn al-din)”. Togril’s elder brother and co-ruler, Chaghri Beg, gave himself the divine title of Malik al-muluk (King of kings). (19) The hatred exhibited by the Seljuk and Hun Turks towards Christians was also harbored by another Turkic people, the original Turks, the Mongols. For one hundred years after the death of Genghis Khan, the Mongolians terrorized Europe. (20) There is a story that reveals the antichrist spirit of the Mongol Turks. A Russian prince named Michael came to submit to the Mongolian ruler, Batu Khan, the Mongolians told him to bow down south to worship the spirit of Genghis Kahn, just as the Antichrist will do in the future. Michael told the Mongolians that he would rather die than do such a thing. One of the Mongolians trampled on Michael’s chest, and as he was going through this torture, he looked to one of his Christian soldiers and said: “Be strong because your punishment will not last long and then at once eternal joy will follow.” They took Michael and decapitated him, they then took his soldier and beheaded him as well, (21) fulfilling what John foresaw:And I saw seats; and they sat upon them; and judgment was given unto them; and the souls of them that were beheaded for the testimony of Jesus, and for the word of God, and who had not adored the beast nor his image, nor received his character on their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. (Revelation 20:4)The prophecies of persecution were not made solely for isolated events in the future, but for all of Christian history. The Mongol Turks killed Christians, the Muslim Turks killed Christians, and the future Turkish Ottoman empire will as well slaughter Christians for the Antichrist.The Mongolians invaded Russia and annihilated the Christians in Kiev. An Italian friar, Giovanni DiPlano Carpini, who was sent by Pope Innocent IV in 1245 to observe the Mongols, entered the city of Kiev and witnessed the horrifying aftermath of the genocide:“They destroyed citifies and castles and killed men and besieged Kiev, which is the greatest Russian city, and after a long siege they took Kiev and killed the townspeople, so when we went through that country we found countless human skulls and bones from the dead scattered over the field. Indeed Kiev had been a very great and populous city but now is reduced to almost nothing. In fact, there are hardly two hundred houses there now and the people are held in the strictest servitude. Carrying the war from there, the Tartars [Mongols] destroyed all of Russia.” (22) The Mongolians took numerous Russian princes, or Knyazes, placed them under a board and ate dinner on top of them as they suffocated to death. It is no wonder that the Russians called the Mongols, “shedders of Christian blood.” When the Mongolians invaded the Russian town of Volodimir, the Christians fled to the Church of the Holy Mother of God. The pagan Mongols broke “down the doors, piled up wood and set fire to the sacred church; and slew all, thus they perished, giving up their souls to God.” (23) After the Mongolians invaded Moscow, Perevaslavl, Yurev, Dmitrov, Volok, and Tver, they invaded Torkhok, “slew all from the male sex even to the female, all the priests and the monks,” (24) just like the Huns and the Muslim Turks. What is most interesting is that after the Mongolian invasion, in the year 1380, the Mongolians returned to Russia to completely vanquish it. But this time these Mongolians were not shamanists, but Muslims, led by the commander of the Blue Hoard, Mamai. And unlike before, the Russians were not utterly pillaged and plundered, but stood their ground in the profound Battle of Kulikovo. When the Mongols were pagans, they wanted Russia, and when they were Muslims, they wanted Russia. Regardless if they were pagan or Muslim, the Turks wanted Russia, and the whole of Christendom. It will be the same in the future, with a revived Ottoman Turkey fighting to destroy Christian Russia. Mongolian artThe Mongolians were not some sudden plunderers who would come and start scuffles, they were an empire, and not just that, they formed the largest empire in history. Their trail of blood and gore went from Central Asia all the way to Western Europe. They wanted to take Europe just as the Muslims wanted Europe. When they struck Europe, they, in the words of Matthew Paris, “came with the force of lightening into the territories of the Christians, laying waste the country, committing great slaughter, and striking inexpressible terror and alarm into every one.” Paris also described how the Mongols “struck great fear and terror into all Christendom. Already had they, with unheard-of tyranny, in a great measure reduced to a desert the countries of Friesland, Gothland, Poland, Bohemia, and both divisions of Hungary, slaying or putting to flight princes, prelates, citizens and rustics.” (25)The seriousness of the Mongol invasion was so prodigious that the Emperor Frederic wrote to the king of England, that:“We cannot be silent on a matter which concerns not only the Roman empire, whose office it is to propagate the Gospel, but also all the kingdoms of the world.” The same letter speaks of how when the Mongols invaded Hungary, they “slew the prelates and nobles of the kingdom who opposed them, and massacred such a host of the Hungarians, that a similar slaughter was never remembered to have taken place in one battle, from the most remote period.” The letter also speaks of how the Mongolians invaded Catholic Poland, and how “that country has been devastated by them.” (26) In a letter addressed the Archbishop of Bordeaux, it states that “Experience alone shows what great danger threatens the Christians through the invasion of the Tartars [Mongols].” (27)The horrific brutality inflicted by the Mongol reminds me of how Pope Urban II described the Seljuk Turks. He spoke of how they invaded the lands of the Christians and "depopulated them by the sword, pillage and fire;" how they "destroy the altars, after having defiled them with their uncleanness. They circumcise the Christians, and the blood of the circumcision they either spread upon the altars or pour into the vases of the baptismal font. When they wish to torture people by a base death, they perforate their navels, and dragging forth the extremity of the intestines, bind it to a stake; then with flogging they lead the victim around until the viscera having gushed forth the victim falls prostrate upon the ground. Others they compel to extend their necks and then, attacking them with naked swords, attempting to cut through the neck with a single blow. What shall I say of the abominable rape of the women? To speak of it is worse than to be silent." (28)Portrait of pagan Turkic Mongols, in their shamanist ritualThe Mongolians were said to have styled their hair in the shape of the crescent moon on their foreheads -- the mark of Antichrist -- they also braided their hair, as what the Muslim warriors themselves did. As the scholar, C. de Bridia, wrote:“On the foreheads, however, they wear their hair in a crescent-shaped fringe reaching to the eyebrows, but gather up the remaining hair, and arrange and braid it like the Saracens [Muslims].” (29) As the Seljuk and Ottoman Turks wanted Christendom to submit to the Muslim Caliph and the Sultan of their Islamic Turkish empire, the Mongol Turks wanted Christendom to submit to their khans or emperors. As the Muslim Turk ruler, Chaghri, called himself “King of kings,” the Mongolian king, Guyuk Khan, called himself “The Power of God, the Emperor of all Men,” and the superscription over his seal said: “God in Heaven and Cuyuc [Guyuk] over the Earth, the Power of God, the Seal of the Emperor of all Men”. Reminiscently, the Muslim Turkish Caliph calls himself, "Khalifa-t Allah," or "the Inheritor of Allah on earth." This is reminiscent to some of the other extolling appellations that Seljuk rulers would uphold on themselves. For example, in a decree ordered by the Seljuk sultan, Malik-Shah, it reads:“the Exalted and Almighty [Divine] Presence chose me from all of humanity for being a padshah, and made me a vicegerent (khalifa) in ruling over the world.” (30) In fact, the Seljuks, like the Mongolians, believed that it was their divine destiny to rule the earth. It is said that Saljuk, the father of the Seljukians, had a dream in which he urinated fire, and sparks flew from the flames and spread east and west. Saljuk consulted a mu’abbir, or dream interpreter, and he told him what the dream signified: the Seljuks were “destined to rule over the whole Earth.” (31) With this sense of destiny of universal empire, the Seljuks invaded Christendom, conquering most of Christian Anatolia, and almost took Constantinople if it were not for the Catholic Crusaders who struck them in the late eleventh century. As Saljuk had a dream interpreter tell him of a divine destiny for world empire, Genghis Khan was also told by an interpreter of dreams, only this time it was the interpreter who had the dream. In a Mongolian text it says:But a sign from Heaven came to me in a dreamand told me that Temujin [Genghis Khan] was meant to be our leader.In this dream I saw a great cow enter our camp.First she circled Jamugha,then she charged at his tent,then charged at Jamugha himself,striking him with her head and breaking one of her horns.'Bring me my horn!' she cried to him,'Bring me my horn!'bellowing at him as she stood therekicking up dustclouds with her hooves,with one crooked horn on her head.Then an ox with no horns at allpulled up the tent stake and harnessed himself to the cart.He drew away Jamugha's cart and began bellowing,'Heaven and earth have agreedthat Temujin should be Lord of the Nation.' (32) The Mongolians, the Altaic brothers of the Seljuks, demanded that Christendom, the Pope -- the vicegerent of Christ -- and the Catholic Church submit to the khan or emperor, an antichrist and vicegerent of the devil. Carpini, the Italian friar who stayed with the Mongolians to learn more about them in order to help prepare Christendom to fight these heathens, wrote this warning:“Therefore, because except for Christendom, there is no land in the world which they have not taken, they are preparing to fight us. Everyone should know that we lived at the Tartar court where there had been convened a solemn counsel at which it has been decided for many years (we were there when they elected Cuyuc emperor in our presence, who is called Khan in their language) which aforesaid Cuyuc Khan raised his standard along with those of all his princes, against the Church of God and the Roman Empire, and against all the states of Christendom and the people of the West, unless they do what he has ordered of the Lord Pope and the great men anf the whole population of the Western Christians.” (33) This reminds me of what Alp Arslan, the Seljukian sultan who enabled the Turks to vanquish Anatolia, proclaimed to his men after the Battle of Manzikert in 1071:"Henceforth all of you be like lion cubs and eagle young, racing through the countryside day and night, slaying the Christians and not sparing any mercy on the Roman nation." (34) Portrait of Alp ArslanThis strong sense of being divinely destined to conquer and rule the earth amongst the Mongol Turks, was recorded by C. de Bridia, when he wrote of how Genghis Khan ordained that the Mongols “should conquer every country in the world and make peace with none unless they surrendered unconditionally and without treaty, and even then he ordered that all of nobler rank should be slain and only plebeians be spared.” (35) So, the Seljukian Turks, the Hun Turks and the Mongol Turks, all hated Christians and warred against Christendom. Let us look to some more peoples who would, conventionally, not be considered Turks: the Japanese. The Mongolians, just like the Japanese, worshipped their emperors, especially Genghis Khan, whose spirit they worshipped after his death. This apotheosis of Genghis was written of by C. de Bridia in his study on the Tatars:“They place before the station of every Khan an idol which they first made in the image of Chingis Khan, and offer it gifts.” (36)The Mongols made an image of this beast, Genghis Khan.In one correspondence contemporaneous with the Mongol invasions, it describes how the Mongols “have for their lord one, whom they worship and reverence with all obedience, and whom they call god on earth.” (37) The chronicler Matthew Paris recounted how the Mongolians were “thirsting after and drinking blood, and tearing and devouring the flesh of dogs and human beings;” (38) and in the letter addressed to the Archbishop of Bordeaux, it recollects how when the Mongolians invaded Austria, “Virgins were deflowered until they died of exhaustion. Then their breasts were cut off to be dainties for their chiefs, and their bodies furnished a jovial banquet to savages.” (39)Rape and cannibalism was done by the Japanese at a mass level when they invaded and pillaged China. During their conquest of Nanking, Japanese soldiers would cut off the genitalia of Chinese men because there was a high demand for human penises, since it was believed amongst the Japanese that the human phallus would provide virility once consumed. Iris Chang documented this absolutely diabolical evil:“One Japanese reporter who later investigated the Rape of Nanking learned that at least one Japanese soldier tore the heart and liver out of a Chinese victim to eat them. Even genitals, apparently, were consumed: a Chinese solider who escaped from Japanese custody saw several dead people in the streets with their penises cut off. He was later told that the penises were sold to Japanese customers who believed that eating them would increase virility.” (40) Like their Mongol and Seljuk brethren before them, the Japanese raped women to death and did innumerable inhumanities and violations. “Every day, twenty-four hours a day,” reported the Dagong Daily newspaper, “there was not one hour when an innocent woman was not being dragged off somewhere by a Japanese soldier.” Even elderly women were sodomized by the Japanese soldiers; grandmothers and even great-grandmothers could not escape the reprobate clutches of the savages. One Japanese soldier raped a sixty year old woman, and then he was ordered to “clean the penis by her mouth.” One sixty-two year old woman, surrounded by soldiers, protested that she was too old for sex, and the heathen Japanese “rammed a stick up her instead.” Many eighty year old women were raped, so much so that they were ravished to death. Pregnant women were also raped, or women who had just given birth a few days prior. Japanese soldiers would also rip open the bellies of pregnant women and tear out the unborn children for their own sadistic entertainment.Carnage in Nanking Japanese soldiers bayoneting victimThere are countless stories of horror from which one can learn about the absolute diabolism of the Japanese. There is the story of a slaughter of an entire household, which took place on December 13, 1937. Thirty Japanese soldiers approached a home, shot the landlord dead as soon as he opened the door, and entered. The landlord’s wife asked why they killed her husband, they looked at her, and shot her dead as well. They spotted a woman, Mrs. Hsia, hiding under a table holding her baby. The Japanese soldiers gripped her and dragged from away from underneath the table, stripped her naked and gang raped her. They then bayoneted her through the chest and shoved a bottle of perfume into her vagina. After this, they took her baby and pierced the infant’s body with the blade of a bayonet. They continued to walk within the home. They entered one room and saw Mrs Hsia’s parents and her two teenage daughters, ages 16 and 14. The grandmother desperately tried to shield the two girls; the Japanese shot her dead with a revolver. The grandfather held onto the body of his wife, and the soldiers swiftly slew him. They took the two girls, denuded them, and several soldiers took turns raping them. Afterwards, they took a bamboo stick and shoved it inside the older girl’s vagina, and the other girl they bayoneted to death. They continued to walk about the house, they spotted two children, ages 4 and 2, who belonged to the landlord. They seized the younger child and split his head in two with a sword, and the other they bayoneted to death. Before they left they spotted an eight year old girl, a daughter of the landlords. They bayoneted her and she was left for dead. The Japanese left the home, to continue their creation of an ocean of gore and carnage. The eight year old girl, now injured, hid in the home with her four year old sister. The four year old was hiding under the covers during the massacre, and almost suffocated. Weeks after the massacre, a member of the International Committee entered the home, spotted the two children — who were living off rice crusts — and all of the aftermath of the butchery. “While I was there,” he later testified, “the blood on the table [was] not all dry yet.” (41)The Japanese, like the Seljuks and the Mongolians, believed that they were divinely destined to rule the earth. Shimizu Ryuzan, former president of Rissho University, said in 1934:“The underlying principle of the spirit of Japan is the enlightenment of the world with truth. Just as our bother Manchurians have come to follow us with affection, so also must we lead all the nations of the world into righteousness and establish heaven on earth, where brotherly love and worldwide peace shall prevail and where all men shall be Buddhist saints. This is the true ideal of the spirit of Japan.” (42)In 1946, Narahashi Wataru, chief cabinet secretary in the government of Prime Minister Shidehara Kijuro, explained the Allied position on Japanese ideology and how it pushed Japan to war:Because the Japanese people believed the emperor to be a god, they calmly died on his behalf, crying out, “May the emperor live for ten thousand years!” Claiming that it had to make the August Virtue of His Majesty shine throughout the world, Japan adopted [the slogan of] “the eight corners of the world under one roof” and committed aggression. (43)Just as the Mongolians wanted the world to worship Genghis Khan, and all of their other khans, and as the Seljuks wanted the world to bow down towards Mecca and to revere the sultans, so the Japanese wanted all of humanity to bow down towards the emperor. The Japanese worship the sun goddess, Amaterasu, even till this day. They even carry up a little tabernacle, called a mikoshi, in which they believe a deity lives. On top of the false tabernacle is placed an idol of a bird, which looks like a cherubim from the Near East, which obviously represents a demon, or fallen angel.The Mongolians were as well very devout to sun worship. In an ancient Mongolian text, it reads of how Temujin (Genghis Khan) bowed down to the sun:"Temujin turned toward the Sun and took his hat in his hand.He loosened his belt and threw it over his neck.Then striking his breast with his hand,he knelt nine times to the Sun,sprinkling offerings of mare's milk in the air,and he prayed." (44)And just like the Mongols and the Seljuks, and the Huns, the Japanese hated Christianity, and believed that their war was a divine mission to not only have everyone submit to their emperor, but to also destroy Christianity. For example, Ouchi Seiran, a very reputable Japanese Buddhist scholar, in a work published in 1912, wrote:“Christianity and our imperial house can never coexist, for it is impossible to truly revere the imperial house while believing in Christianity. …Christianity not only turns its back on the righteous Buddhist teaching of cause and effect, but it is a heretical teaching that tears apart the establishment of our imperial house and destroys the foundation of our country. …Therefore we must all join together to prevent this heretical teaching from spreading throughout our land.” (45) The antichrist spirit of the pagan Japanese was most definitely manifested in their genocides. In the words of Iris Chang, “The Japanese attacked women in nunneries, churches, and Bible training schools. Seventeen soldiers raped one woman in succession in a seminary compound.” (46) For six weeks the Japanese set fires to Nanking, and one of their particular targets were churches, setting them to flames. (47) Raping women in churches, and destroying churches, was what was committed by the Ottoman Turks and their Islamized European auxiliaries when they invaded Constantinople. The Turks flooded the Church of the Hagia Sofia where they raped women and took Christians to be their slaves. The loveliest maiden was sought out by the most degenerate Turk, and not even the nuns were spared by the rapacious Muslims who indulged themselves in the wickedest acts of rape and kidnapping. The braids of women were tugged and pulled by Turks who competed for them; they ripped through their garments and exposed their breasts and bosoms. People were driven out of the church and flogged, and within one hour all of the men where bounded together by a cord like the Hebrew slaves in ancient Egypt. They were chained together and were treated as though they were not human, but a herd of beasts. Over sixty thousand people were transported to the Muslim camps and ships, exchanged and sold, and dispersed throughout the provinces of the Ottoman Empire. (48) The Janissaries tore down the crucifix in the Hagia Sofia, placed a Turkish turbin on the thorn-pierced head and mockingly paraded through the streets as they scoffingly said, "Behold the God of the Christians." Ever since then the Hagia Sofia has never been touched by Christian hands; it still remains in Turkey as a great bare slab in iconoclastic fury. (49)Spiritual deception was utilized by both the Turks and even the Japanese in their invasions of Christian countries. For example, a few years after the Turks invaded Constantinople in 1453, they brought in a new bishop named Gennadius to be the patriarch of the church in Constantinople, and each year, the Ottoman approved patriarch would have dialogues with the sultan on the similarities between Islam and Christianity. The Japanese also used spiritual deception to bring their Catholic subjects into submission. When the Japanese invaded and conquered the Mariana Islands, including Guam, they understood that it would have been difficult to get the locals — called Chamorros — who were Catholics, to submit to the cult of the emperor. The Japanese invaded Guam on December 8th, 1941, the day of the Feast of the Immaculate Conception. The people were getting ready to partake in the celebration, when Japanese bombs struck the land. Bishop Miguel Olano, after finishing the Mass in his city of Hagatna, told everyone in the congregation to evacuate the city as soon as they could. In the early hours of December 10th, six thousand Japanese troops covered the beaches of Guam. The Japanese authorities declared as a message to the Christian locals of Guam that they conquered their island “for the purpose of restoring liberty and rescuing the whole Asiatic people and creating the permanent peace in Asia. Thus our intention is to establish the New Order of the World.” All churches in Guam were confiscated and declared as Japanese property.Bishop Miguel OlanoThe Japanese took the Cathedral in Hagatna, they committed an abomination of desolation, where the wheat offering is expelled, and forced the Catholic Sacraments to be removed, and transformed it into a prison for American civilians, and then later on into a distribution center for Japanese propaganda and a dance and entertainment hall. The Japanese also took over the Baptist Church in Hagatna and made it into a Shinto shrine. All American Catholic priests in Guam were arrested and imprisoned in the Cathedral, and the Spanish bishop, Angel Olano Urteaga, was as well confined behind bars. After the Japanese did this, there were only two Catholic priests left in the whole island — Fr. Oscar Lujan Calvo and Fr. Jesus Baza Duenas — to minister to 21,000 Catholics. There was also the sole Baptist minster in Guam, Reverend Joaquin Flores Sablan. Fr. Jesus was the older priest, and because of his tough exterior and indomitable spirit, he was called the “Lone Ranger.”Fr. Oscar Lujan Calvo (left) and Fr. Jesus Baza DuenasOne day the Japanese governor of Guam, Homura Teiichi, told the two Catholic priests and the Baptist pastor to discourage the people from celebrating the Catholic feast days, since the war — according to him — could have forced the populace to starve. The Baptist minister and the younger priest agreed to these demands, but Fr. Jesus refused to do this, exclaiming that it was in hardship where the Catholics could exhibit their true love and faith. The governor was so furious that it appeared that he was about to unsheathe his Samurai sword and decapitate Fr. Jesus. In a different meeting, governor Homura told the Baptist minister, Sabalan, that the Japanese had come to destroy any trace of American culture in Guam, and that included him and his church. The Japanese knew that they needed to create a synchronism between Catholicism and Shintoism, in order to have the Chamorros bow down to their emperor. They created a very strict law for both the Catholic and Baptist services, that before each church service, the congregation had to bow down towards the emperor, the image of the beast and an antichrist on earth. To help keep this enforced, Japan sent two of their Catholic priests, Monsignor Dominic Fukahori and Fr. Petero Komatsu. Fukahori used the pulpit to convey Japanese propaganda during the homily, praising “the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere which Japan was attempting to build during World War II and extol the glories of the Emperor.” Petero Komatsu Monsignor FukahoriHe would also declare that Japan was defeating the Americans in the war. To the majority of Guam’s Catholics, and to the two sole priests, these priests from Japan were spies who could not be trusted. While Fr. Jesus was not present in his perish, Monsignor Fukahori and Fr. Komatsu tried to convince the Catholics in the church that Japan was already victorious in the war, and that if they would cooperate with the regime of the emperor, Japan would bring peace and harmony to Guam. Once Fr. Jesus was aware of these evil wolves, he wrote a letter to Fukahori, calling him a spy for the Japanese military, and, referencing Pope Benedict XV, affirmed that it was contrary to the Faith for a priest to work in a nation while at the same time advancing the agenda of a foreign country. In 1944, the Americans fought the Japanese in Guam, and the Japanese in turn forced the locals to be slaves in the fields, to help feed the Japanese forces, carry supplies and munitions and build defenses. Fr. Jesus explicitly ordered that Catholics disobey the Japanese. Fr. Jesus, and other Catholics, were helping an American radioman, George Tweed, clothing and hiding him from the Japanese who were viciously trying to kill him. One of the Japanese priests told Fr. Jesus to stop ministering to the Chamorros alone. Fr. Jesus told the heretic that he only answered to God, and the Japanese race was not God nor divine. Fr. Jesus, along perhaps hundreds of other Catholics, were arrested. The Japanese tortured the priest and the Catholic prisoners, demanding from them to reveal where the American radioman was hidden. As Fr. Jesus endured torture, the Americans were rescuing George Tweed. Fr. Jesus never talked, regardless of all of the tortures they put him through. Fr. Jesus’ last words were: “God will look after me. I have done no wrong.” After he said this, his neck was struck by the Samurai sword, and he was beheaded, on July 11th, 1944. He was an Elijah, defying the tyranny of false priests, striking at the enemy with the Sword of the Spirit, and in emulation of the Incarnation of Hope, allowed himself to carry the Cross with Christ, and brought vision to mankind on the ascendency of humility over the guile of despots and the despotism of delusion. As martyrs were made under the oppressions of the heathen, so will many more continue leave the finite existence of the world, and enter eternity. The war has never stopped, between the saint and the slaves of the diabolical, between civilization and tyranny, between Christendom and savagery, sanguinary bloodlust that will be seen by horrified witnesses in the face of oceans of blood spilt by the restored empire of the Turk. It is true that the people of Turkey are, for the most part, not really Turks, but Greeks, Slavs and Circassians whose ancestors were forced into Islam by the Turks in the past, and who were brainwashed into zealously accepting the race of their conquerers. But the concept of "the Turk," has become, for people in Turkey, more of an ideology than a race. Ottomanism is an ideology that glorifies a race, and it is subscribed to by a people not even of that race, but who nonetheless are willing to kill for its ideology. The ideology is world conquest under the spirit of antichrist, and the means by which to do it, is to use the very people that you want conquered to do the conquering for you. It is a curse, a curse only broken by Christianity. As it was in the past, so shall it be in the future, with the Cross of Christendom, crushing the crescent of the Turk.REFERENCES(1) Gregory, History of the Franks, 2.16, trans. Thorpe(2) That the Turks are Huns, see John Skylitzes, Byzantine History, 21.9. Michael Attaleiates calls the Seljuks "Nephthalite Huns" (History, 8.1; 14.1)* (2a)*Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 1, pp. 9, 10(3) See the Chronicle of Pseudo-Joshua, 60, 279, alongside the notes by the translators, Frank R. Trombley and John W. Watt(4) Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 1, p. 11(5) For more on the Seljuks, see Belloc, The Crusades, ch. ii, pp. 9-11; The Great Heresies, The Great and Enduring Heresy of Muhammad, p. 50; Moczar, Islam at the Gates, prologue, act 3, p. 19; Mills, Hist. Crus. ch. i, p. 2; Nicolle, Manzikert 1071, ch. 1, pp. 8, 12(6) See Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 1, p. 16(7) See Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 1, p. 16(8) Michael Attaleiates, History, 14.1(9) See Michael Attaleiates, History, 8.2-3(10) In John France, "Impelled by the Love of God", in Thomas F. Madden's The Crusades, part 2, p. 35(11) See Gibbon, Decline and Fall, vol. v, ch. lvii, pp. 1034-1036(12) Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 1, pp. 25-26(13) Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 1, p. 43(14) Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 1, p. 43(15) Belloc, The Crusades, ch. 2, p. 10, ellipses mine(16) Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 1, p. 35 (17) See Itzkowitz, Ottoman Empire and Islamic Tradition, ch. 1, p. 4 (18) Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 1, p. 30(19) Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 1, p. 30(20) McCullough, Chronicles of the Barbarians, ch. 13, p. 269 (21) Carpini, The Story of the Mongols, ch. 3, pp. 43-44 (22) Carpini, The Story of the Mongols, ch. 5, p. 68(23) See the Chronicle of Novgorod, ed. McCullough, ch. 13, pp. 286-287 (24) Ibid(25) Matthew Paris, Chronicles, ed. McCullough, ch. 13, p. 291(26) See Matthew Paris, Chronicles, ed. McCullough, ch. 13, pp. 293-294(27) Matthew Paris, Chronicles, ed. McCullough, ch. 13, p. 296(28) Pope Urban II at the Council of Clermont, the version of Robert the Monk, in Edward Peters, The First Crusade, p. 2(29) C. de Bridia, The Tatar Relation, ed. McCullough, ch. 13, p. 276(30) See Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 2, pp. 61-62(31) See Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam, ch. 2, p. 18(32) The Secret History of the Mongols, pp. 47-48, ed. Paul Khan(33) Carpini, The Story of the Mongols, ch. 8, pp. 85-86(34) Nicolle, Manzikert 1071, p. 92(35) C. de Bridia, The Tartar Relation, ed. McCullough, ch. 13, p. 278 (36) C. de Bridia, The Tatar Relation, ed. McCullough, ch. 13, p. 277 (37) See McCullough, Chronicles of the Barbarians, ch. 13, p. 294(38) Matthew Paris, Chronicles, ed. McCullough, ch. 13, p. 290 2(39) Matthew Paris, Chronicles, ed. McCullough, ch. 13, p. 297(40) Iris Chang, The Rape of Nanking, ch.4, pp. 88-89(41) Iris Chang, The Rape of Nanking, ch. 4, pp. 92-93(42) Shimizu, Rissho Ankoku no Taigi to Nippon Seishin, p. 46, in Victoria, Zen At War, ch. 5, p. 64(43) Quoted in Tamaki Benkichi, Kaiso — Yamamoto Tempo, p. 156, in Victoria, Zen War Stories, ch. 6, p. 100(44) The Secret History of the Mongols, p. 34, ed. Paul Khan(45) Akiyama, Sonno Aikoku Ron, pp. 49-52, in Victoria, Zen at War, ch. 4, 52(46) Iris Chang, The Rape of Nanking, ch. 4, pp. 90-91 (47) See Iris Chang, The Rape of Nanking, ch. 7, p. 160(48) See Gibbon, Decline and Fall, vol. v, ch. liviii (49) Carroll, A History of Christendom, vol. iii, ch. xiii, p. 568 print anonymous armageddon isis islam war Make No Mistake About It, There Is Going To Be A Great World War Between Christendom And The Turkish Armies Of The Antichrist By Theodore Shoebat In the history of Christendom, there is this continuous fight, between the crusaders and the Turk. From the early M... Read More...»