A woman in the UK has been arrested and convicted after she pretended to be a man and then had sex with the other woman using a fake penis according to a recent report:
A woman who wore a prosthetic penis and tricked her blindfolded friend into sex has been jailed.
Gayle Newland, 27, of Willaston, Cheshire, created an online persona pretending to be a man and continued the deceit for two years.
A retrial jury found her guilty of committing three sexual assaults, which she denied, using a prosthetic penis without her victim's consent.
+She was jailed at Manchester Crown Court for six-and-a-half years.
Sentencing her, Recorder of Manchester, Judge David Stockdale QC, said: "Truth can sometimes be stranger than fiction.
"The truth, the whole truth, here is as surprising as it is profoundly disturbing."
He added: "It is difficult to conceive of a deceit so degrading or so damaging for the victim upon its discovery."
Newland was originally jailed for eight years in November 2015 after she was convicted of the same offences, which happened in 2013.
But the conviction was later quashed on the grounds the trial judge's summing up of the case was not fair and balanced. (source)
This story first speaks to the degeneracy of the LGBT. Driven by lust and justified by their own wills, there is no low to which the LGBT will not go because they define their self-realization by the maximization of their pleasure. It does not matter who they hurt or what the consequences of their actions are so long as they enjoy it because they make themselves the standard for what is right and wrong.
Second, this story illustrates the degeneracy of the culture. As the story notes, the two people met exclusively for sex, and the woman insisted the other wear a mask at all times to conceal her face. This was not done by force, but as the story says, it was all STRICTLY BY CONSENT.
So tell me, if this story happened in all the details EXCEPT that it was actually a man, would she have ever even gone to court? The answer is obviously no, because the only reason she went to court was because she was "surprised" that it was a man.
Make no mistake, rape is wrong, but it equally evil to use claims of "rape" to cover for one's own consent to disgusting and degrading behavior. However, because of the decline of Christendom and its replacement with a form of secular paganism, "Western society" has reached a perverse dualism where immoral sexual activity is lauded as a virtue yet the moment a person complains about the immorality there is an immediate reversal that condemns the other party as almost entirely evil without recognizing the role of the other party in the same act.
There was no "rape," there was no "sexual assault" that happened. It was a case of a perverse and immoral woman who consented to and engaged in perverse activity with another pervert. After she realized that she was deceived by the other person, she is now trying to use the laws of society to present herself as the "victim" of the very mess that she herself is accountable for creating.
Third, and a question that was alluded to in the article but has not been answered, is was this a case of a lesbian love affair gone wrong?
All LGBT relationships are unnatural, but even in the midst of their perversity they LGBT will try to mirror the roles of the respective gender in any relationship. Among males, there is the "feminine" gay man paired with the "masculine" gay man. For women, it's the "butch" for the male role and the "dyke" for the woman role.
As disgusting as men having penetrative sex with other men is, both parties get actual physical pleasure out of it because they are directly stimulating each other. But in the case of women in sapphic relationships, its is not as much so, since as they try to mirror in a perverted way the relations between men and women, one member is penetrated and the other penetrates with usually an object, such as a plastic penis (as in the case in this story). While all homosexual relationships are about power dynamics as opposed to love, this is most clearly visible with lesbians, since the "butch" in the relationship gets no physical pleasure from the relations with the other woman other than the sole satisfaction of domination and humiliation of another person.
In following the line of logic raised earlier about how the accuser brought the woman to court because she was embarrassed by her actions, could it be that she knew the other party was a woman and took her to court because she was humiliated by either her personal conduct or something that happened in the bedroom, and this is her way of seeking "revenge" on her? While anonymous and random hookups are a veritable feature of modern life for many people in "western society," it is difficult to believe that this woman could meet for sex with the same person THREE TIMES and still not realize that "he" was a "she." I know that before I have EVER asked anybody out on a date in my life, I always made sure that "she" was actually a "she," and it took me only a few seconds at most to figure this out.
Crocodile Dundee and the "sheila test." It's not too hard to determine a man from a woman. Hence I have a hard time believing that a woman for not one, but THREE hookups did not realize that she was being penetrated by a plastic penis.
This story, while small and strange, is a microcosm for the strange and perverse times that we live in. By giving unbridled license to license, "western society" has been plunged into a cesspool of its own creation where it tries to use moral arguments to justify its own immorality while at the same time saying that morality is unnecessary.
Post a Comment