ANONYMOUS - OUR VOICE

Archeologists Declare That They Have Discovered The Bones Of St. Peter In One Thousand Year Old Church In Rome

By Walid ShoebatArcheologists have declared that they have discovered the bones of St. Peter in a one thousand year old church in Rome. According to <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.christianpost.com/news/bones-belonging-to-st-peter-one-of-jesus-apostles-allegedly-uncovered-at-1000-y-old-roman-church-198885/">one report</a>:<blockquote>Bones that allegedly belong to St. Peter, one of Jesus Christ's apostles, who is also considered by Roman Catholics to be the first pope, have been uncovered at a 1,000-year-old church in Rome.The Telegraph reported on Monday that a worker found the bones inside clay pots at the Church of Santa Maria in Cappella in the district of Trastevere.The pots were apparently buried beneath a large marble slab near the medieval altar of the church, which has been closed for 35 years due to damage."There were two clay pots which were inscribed with the names of early popes – Peter, Felix, Callixtus and Cornelius. I'm not an archaeologist but I understood immediately that they were very old," the workman told Rai Uno, an Italian television channel. "Looking at them, I felt very emotional."Peter is known for having denied Christ three times in the Bible, before repenting, and later on being crucified upside down in Rome in the first century as a Christian martyr.The Vatican said that it will wait for a DNA comparison between the newly discovered relics and other bones of St. Peter under its care before it comments on the issue.The Telegraph suggested that the reason the bones may have been kept at the Santa Maria church is due to internal power struggles in the Catholic Church during Pope Urban II's reign in the 11th century."While Urban was generally recognized as the legitimate pope, he faced a challenge from an anti-pope, Clement III, who had set up a rival power base in Rome, backed by the Holy Roman Emperor Henry IV," the article stated."The church in Trastevere was closely linked to Pope Urban and may have been seen by him as a secure place in which to hide the bones."Pope Francis publicly unveiled other bone fragments believed to belong to Peter back in 2013, which were forensically examined in the 1960s and showed that they came from a man in his early sixties who lived in the first century.Those remains are believed to have been interred in a tomb on Vatican Hill following Peter's death, with St. Peter's Basilica eventually being built over it.Excavations following World War II under the basilica found a funerary monument with a casket built in honor of Peter and a Greek engraving reading "Peter is here," which contained the relics.A team of archaeologists announced in August that they may have found Peter's home in a lost Roman imperial city off of the Sea of Galilee, where the apostles Philip and Andrew also lived.The Kinneret College researchers said at the time that the city of Julias was built as part of the town of Bethsaida, mentioned in John 1:44 as the hometown of the three apostles.Haaretz cautioned that there are "three candidates for Julias," however, including two earlier discovered sites by Galilee.</blockquote>These may be the bones of St. Peter, or they may not. What we can truly learn from this story is the antiquity of the Roman Church, how ancient it is, and how its archeology really proves that the Catholic Church really is rooted Apostolic succession.Three times did Christ ask St. Peter: “Lovest thou me?” and three times did that holy rock of the Church say: “Lord, thou knowest all things: thou knowest that I love thee.”And what did Christ say at the end? “Feed my sheep.” (John 21:15-17) A shepherd feeds his flock; a shepherd is a significant leader of the Church, the flock is an analogy of the people within the Church. Thus, Christ calls Peter to be shepherd of the Church.  And where did St. Peter and St. Paul go? They went to Rome. From the Middle East, to the West, did Israel spread its light of truth to the heathens. This is expressed by Eusebius in his Church History:<blockquote>“For immediately, during the reign of Claudius, the all-good and gracious Providence, which watches over all things, led Peter, that strongest and greatest of the apostles, and the one who on account of his virtue was the speaker for all the others, to Rome against this great corrupter of life. He like a noble commander of God, clad in divine armor, carried the costly merchandise of the light of the understanding from the East to those who dwelt in the West, proclaiming the light itself, and the word which brings salvation to souls, and preaching the kingdom of heaven.” (1)</blockquote>In Israel was the light of God revealed to mankind, under the starry sky of Mesopotamia, when the Lord appeared to Abraham and declared to him that the number of his descendants will be as numerous as the stars. In Israel the Savior of Mankind appeared, and by the ark of His Church, did Israel spread throughout the nations, making gentiles into the sons of Abraham. The Jewish authorities held Paul in a trial, and they abused him. The high priest, Ananias, told his men, “smite him on the mouth.” (Acts 23:3) In this abuse Paul said: “God shall smite thee, thou whited wall: for sittest thou to judge me after the law, and commandest me to be smitten contrary to the law?” (Acts 23:3) Later, Paul was put into captivity, and while he was kept inside of a castle, the Lord appeared to him and said: <blockquote>“Be of good cheer, Paul: for as thou hast testified to me in Jerusalem, so must thou bear witness also at Rome.” (Acts 23:11) </blockquote>These words signify a continuation, from Israel to Rome; for Christ was to form Christendom, and He wants for His prophecy to be a reality, that His name shall be “great among the Gentiles, and in every place there is sacrifice, and there is offered to my name a clean oblation: for my name is great among the Gentiles, saith the Lord of hosts.” (Malachi 1:11) Christ wanted Paul to preach in Rome as he preached in Jerusalem, and what did He say of the fate of this great city? “Jerusalem is to be trodden down by the Gentiles; till the times of the nations be fulfilled.” (Luke 21:24) Jerusalem was sacked by the Romans, but what came of Rome? It became the spiritual center of Western Christendom. But what happened to Israel? Did it disappear? The question that lies is, what is Israel? Is Israel a race or is it a spirituality? If we say that it is a race, then we are no different than those scribes to whom St. John the Baptist proclaimed:<blockquote>“Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of penance; and do not begin to say, We have Abraham for our father. For I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children to Abraham.” (Luke 3:8) </blockquote>Israel is the heavenly Mount Zion, and when we enter its depths we come to “the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to the company of many thousands of angels, And to the church of the firstborn, who are written in the heavens, and to God the judge of all, and to the spirits of the just made perfect, And to Jesus the mediator of the new testament, and to the sprinkling of blood which speaketh better than that of Abel.” (Hebrews 12:22-24) In ancient Israel there was a priesthood, there was sacrifice and penance, and did this cease with the destruction of the Temple, of the sacking of Jerusalem? If we believe that Israel ceased to exist because it no longer was a State or a nation, then we must believe that Israel ceased to exist during the Babylonian Exile. But we believe that Israel never ceased to exist once we uphold her as a spiritual reality. After the sacking of the Temple, to where did Israel go? It continued on, in the Church. The Church is the continuation of Israel, and this perpetuation of Israel is found in Christendom. Ancient Israel was a State, for it had the divine law, and at the same time, it was a spirituality, for God said through Jeremiah: “Be circumcised to the Lord, and take away the foreskins of your hearts” (Jeremiah 4:4). So, Israel was not just a nation, but a condition of the heart.True Judaism is not something that is genetically based, but is rather the state of a soul. A true Jew is a Jew of the heart. “For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel” (Romans 9:6).  Job was not genetically a Jew, rather he was a Edomite, being of the Arabian race, and still the Jews put his book in their canon. Moses was a Hebrew genetically, but he had no issue in marrying into the family of a Midianite Arab named Jethro who the Scripture describes as “the priest of Midian” (Exodus 3:1). And why, if the state of a Jew has to be genetic, would there be a priest of God who is of the Midianite nation? All of this shows Judaism as a spirituality, as opposed to being something solely genetic. “Because, if they deny this,” writes St. Augustine, “they can be most easily confuted by the case of the holy and wonderful man Job, who was neither a native nor a proselyte, that is, a stranger joining the people of Israel, but, being bred of the Idumean race, arose there and died there too, and who is so praised by the divine oracle, that no man of his times is put on a level with him as regards justice and piety. And although we do not find his date in the chronicles, yet from his book, which for its merit the Israelites have received as of canonical authority, we gather that he was in the third generation after Israel.” (2)Just because someone may be genetically Jewish, does not make him a Jew in the ultimate meaning of the word. You have people who say they are Jews, but they are atheists and darwinists. Does them being Jewish make them somehow no different than Moses or the prophets? Absolutely not. But there are so called Christians who have a very unbalanced view of the Jews, seeing them as nearly perfect, or as people who don’t need Christ for salvation. Such a view stems from a morphed view that Israel is about a race, and not about a spirit. It is this ethnocentric view that gets people to fixate on the race of the Jews, as opposed to seeing ancient Israel as part of the greater history of Christendom.  There is also another imbalance, one that expresses nothing but contempt and hatred for the Jews, as a people with whom God is totally done with. This too stems from an imbalanced view that treats with indifference Israel, the people with whom Christendom begins.  Such people who have this mentality ignore the words of St. Augustine when he wrote:<blockquote>“Let the reader but call to mind that corner-stone and those two walls of partition, the one of the Jews, the other of the Gentiles, and he will recognize them, the one under the term sons of Judah, the other as sons of Israel, supporting themselves by one and the same headship, and ascending from the earth. But that those carnal Israelites who are now unwilling to believe in Christ shall afterward believe, that is, their children shall (for they themselves, of course, shall go to their own place by dying), this same prophet testifies, saying, ‘For the children of Israel abide many days without a king, without a prince, without a sacrifice, without an altar, without a priesthood, without manifestations.’ (Hosea 3:4) Who does see that the Jews are now thus? But let us hear what he adds: ‘And afterward shall the children of Israel return, and seek the Lord their God, and David their king, and shall be amazed at the Lord and at his goodness in the latter days.’ (Hosea 3:5)” </blockquote>Notice how Augustine has a balanced view on the Jews. He does not exempt them from criticism, describing the Jews who reject Christ as “carnal Israelites,” who, referencing Hosea's prophecy, have no altar and no sacrifice, that is, they are outside of the Church,  being without the sacrifice of the Eucharist, which is offered by the people who entered the ark of Christ of which the Lord declared:<blockquote>“For from the rising of the sun even unto the going down of the same my name shall be great among the Gentiles; and in every place incense shall be offered unto my name, and a pure offering: for my name shall be great among the heathen, saith the Lord of hosts.” (Malachi 1:11) </blockquote>Augustine does not express hatred for the Jews, or refer to the Jews as being done away with. This great scholar of the Church, instead, remembers that God will bring the Jews back to the fold of Christ, to the true religion of Moses, to the ark of the Church. As St. Jerome wrote to Pope Damasus of the Holy See in Rome:<blockquote>“As I follow no leader save Christ, so I communicate with none but your blessedness, that is with the chair of Peter. For this, I know, is the rock on which the church is built! This is the house where alone the paschal lamb can be rightly eaten. This is the ark of Noah, and he who is not found in it shall perish when the flood prevails.” (3) </blockquote>   Christ came to be the Messiah of Israel, to fulfill what God proclaimed to Abraham:<blockquote>“I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies; and in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice.” (Genesis 22:17-18) </blockquote>Christ did not come for solely those who were genetically descendant of Abraham, no, He came so that all of humanity could become sons of Abraham. Hence St. Paul writes: <blockquote>“Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham. And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed. So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham.” (Galatians 3:7-9) </blockquote>The holy Apostle was combating the racist nationalism that the Jews held onto. When St. Peter had dinner with the centurion, Cornelius, and his family, the judaizers were enraged with him, saying: “Thou wentest in to men uncircumcised, and didst eat with them.” (Acts 11:3) But, when St. Peter explained to them that Christ had commanded him to eat with Cornelius so that he and his household would be baptized and saved, “they held their peace, and glorified God, saying, Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life.” (Acts 11:18)   God came for Israel, but not just for those who were genetically Jews, but for all those willing to become citizens of Israel. Christ came to those who are “aliens from the commonwealth of Israel” (Ephesians 2:12)  so “that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people; there shall they be called the children of the living God.” (Romans 9:26) Salvation has nothing to do with genetics. God did not come to Abraham because of his genetic makeup, but rather because “he looked for a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker is God.” (Hebrews 11:10) The pharisees, in their hatred for Christ, said: “Do you see that we prevail nothing? behold, the whole world is gone after him.” (John 12:19) Indeed, for Christ encompasses the world, in Him is the whole of Humanity; He is the Center of all mortals, and He came to bring all of mankind into Israel. And what does the Scripture say, after quoting these words of the pharisees? <blockquote>“Now there were certain Gentiles among them, who came up to adore on the festival day. These therefore came to Philip, who was of Bethsaida of Galilee, and desired him, saying: Sir, we would see Jesus.” (John 12:20-21) </blockquote>The pharisees were enraged at the fact that all peoples were coming to Christ, and while they were in their animosity and racism, gentiles appeared to worship the Salvation of all humanity, in whom we live, and move, and are (Acts 17:28). The verse is an image of what was to come: the gentiles coming to Christ and in being in Him, becoming Israel. A gentile soldier named Longinus pierced the side of Christ, and blood and water poured forth from His holy rib, representing humanity — symbolized as water — being united to Christ Who, before His crucifixion said: “this is my blood of the new testament, which shall be shed for many unto remission of sins.” (Matthew 26:28) A gentile pierced the rib of Christ and beheld that image that symbolized the union between humanity — both Jew and gentile — and the Sacrifice for humanity; between mankind and the Church through which we receive the Eucharist, that is, the flesh and blood of Christ.   God wanted to create Christendom, and He foreknew that it would be a continuation of Israel by the hand of the Gentiles whose souls would be bridged with the prophets and monastics of Israel. Hence God chose St. Paul, a former Pharisee, “to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel” (Acts 9:15) In Israel there were monks and ascetics and holy kings. Did this somehow cease to continue? Far from it, for it continued on in Christendom, that is, Israel, which never ends and flows like a river into eternity. St. Paul, who was “of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews” (Philippians 3:5), preached not for a new religion, but for the faith of Israel. Those who rejected the faith, refused to enter the ark, and those who accepted the faith, followed the true religion of Moses, “For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me; for he wrote of me.” (John 5:46) Those who followed Christ would become the predecessors of Christendom, handing to posterity this Christendom, the continuation of Israel, a Christendom now dismembered and put to sleep in this horrid Babylonian exodus that we now are in. There is indeed an anciently rooted harmony between Israel and Rome. When the pagan Greeks were butchering the Hebrews, when the people of Israel were under the cruel despotism of the idolatrous tyrants, and they resisted the tyranny of the heathen, Judah went to Rome for protection. Israel and Rome made a covenant, that they would protect each other from their enemies. The Book of Maccabees says:<blockquote>“Judas had heard about the Romans and their reputation as a military power. He knew that they welcomed all those who joined them as allies and that those who came to them could be sure of the friendship of Rome.” (1 Maccabees 8:1-2) </blockquote>Judas Maccabees marveled at the valor of the Romans, at their martial dexterity and their efficiency at conquering other nations, like Spain, Galatia, Media and Lydia. Judah sent Eupolemus to be his emissary to the Romans, and when he arrived in the Senate house of Rome, he declared:<blockquote>“Judah, who is also called Maccabaeus, and his brethren, and the whole people of the Jews, have sent us unto you, to make a confederacy and peace with you, and that we might be registered your confederates and friends.” </blockquote>When the Romans heard this, they sent their covenant to Jerusalem on tablets made of brass, proclaiming:<blockquote>“May things go well forever for the Romans and for the Jewish nation on land and sea! May they never have enemies, and may they never go to war! But if war is declared first against Rome or any of her allies anywhere, the Jewish nation will come to her aid with wholehearted support, as the situation may require. And to those at war with her, the Jews shall not give or supply food, arms, money, or ships, as was agreed in Rome. The Jews must carry out their obligations without receiving anything in return.In the same way, if war is declared first against the Jewish nation, the Romans will come to their aid with hearty support, as the situation may require. And to their enemies there shall not be given or supplied food, arms, money, or ships, as was agreed in Rome. The Romans must carry out their obligations without deception.These are the terms of the treaty that the Romans have made with the Jewish people. But if, in the future, both parties shall agree to add or remove anything, they shall act on their decision, and whatever they add or remove shall be valid.” (1 Maccabees 8:23-32) </blockquote>The Book of Maccabees tells us that the brass tablets were kept in Jerusalem “for a memorial of peace and confederacy.” (1 Maccabees 8:22) It was a covenant of peace between Rome and Jerusalem, and when the Messiah came, they wanted Him to break the covenant with Rome. But God hates covenant breakers, and this is one of the reasons as to why Christ never honored the Jews’ nationalist cause against Rome: it was the breaking of a covenant. When the Jews had gone against Christ, they became like those abominable heathens who are “Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful” (Romans 1:31). Pilate went before the mob and gave them the choice: spare Christ, your King and Messiah, or spare Barrabbas, a nationalist terrorist who murdered a Roman soldier, breaking the covenant made between Rome and Jerusalem by his Maccabeean ancestors. The mob chose Barrabbas, they chose the way of covenant breakers. It was under the system of democracy that Christ was murdered; it was under the bloodthirsty demands of a nationalist mob that Christ was slain; it was under the compliance of a pagan ally that Christ was crucified. And on that wooden cross was there the title, King of the Jews, in the languages of Latin, Greek and Hebrew, and it is truly wondrous that today the Church declares in each mass: <blockquote>“SANCTUS, Sanctus, Sanctus, Dominus Deus Sabaoth. Pleni sunt caeli et terra gloria tua. Hosanna in excelsis. Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini. Hosanna in excelsis.”    “HOLY, holy, holy, Lord God of hosts. Heaven and earth are full of Thy glory. Hosanna in the highest. Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord. Hosanna in the highest.”</blockquote>This is a declaration bearing words of the Latin, Hebrew and Greek languages. Thus the sign on the cross is not just a mere detail of history, but a foreshadowing of Christendom.The soldiers who mocked Christ, do these not presage the coming of the persecutors of the Church? The soldier who declared before the cross, and before Christ’s Mother, the Virgin Mary, “Truly this was the Son of God” (Matthew 27:54), did not this soldier foreshadow the warriors of Christendom, defending the Church — who is represented by the Virgin Mary — against her persecutors? On Mount Golgotha, on this mountain of cosmic struggle, stood the image of Christendom: combat, death, and victory, this is the life of Christendom! Look to the actions and to the zeal of Pope Pius XII when he confronted the evil heretics, the Nazis. When these sanguinary murderers and antichrists began their genocide, Pope Pius XII, rescued hundreds of thousands of Jews from the death camps. Pope Pius XI, his predecessor, also combated Nazism, and on February 11, 1939, the chief rabbi of Paris, Julien Weil, had this to say on the death of Pius XI:<blockquote>“The death of his Holiness Pius XI moves me deeply and painfully. Judaism wholeheartedly joins the universal veneration that surrounded the august Pontiff, admiring and honoring him as a servant of God, a true apostle of social justice, peace and the human fraternity.  On numerous occasions, Pius XI denounced with luminous firmness and clarity the pernicious errors of racist paganism, and he condemned anti-Semitism as irreconcilable with the Christian faith and as an instigator of iniquities and odious violence. I am sure that I express the feelings of my fellow Jews in saluting with respect the great figure of Pius XI and in giving in our prayers a religious expression of our homage of regret and gratitude toward this great servant of the God of justice and love.” (4) </blockquote>When the pagans were persecuting the Hebrews, and mercilessly slaughtering them for observing the Law of Moses, it was racist paganism. And it was Rome who made a pact with the Hebrews to defend them. When the Nazis were slaughtering the Jews by the millions, that was also racist paganism. And it was Rome who came to their defense, thus continuing the oath made between Jerusalem and Rome. When Aeneas, the patriarch of pagan Rome approached the city of Evander, he, wanting to show peace to the inhabitants, reach out with his hand holding a peaceful olive-branch (5) a remnant of what was remembered of a time long past, when a dove returned to Noah with an olive branch in its mouth, revealing that the waters had subsided and peace returned. But now, that the Gentile world has entered the ark, they follow the olivae binae pietatis unicae or the twofold olive-branch of a singular piety, (6) that is, the teachings of St. Peter and Paul, the bishops who brought the Gospel to the Gentiles, bringing them into the ark, and into the fold of Israel, bringing into the world glorious Christendom, a Christendom that must be awakened. In the words of the Spanish Christian poet, Prudentius:<blockquote>“Now the successor of Aeneas, in the imperial purple, prostrates himself in prayer at the house of Christ, and the supreme lord adores the banner of the cross.” (7) </blockquote>Christendom, the continuation of Israel, is here to fight evil, to combat the diabolical systems that seek wage war on humanity itself.

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Archeologists Declare That They Have Discovered The Bones Of St. Peter In One Thousand Year Old Church In Rome

By Walid Shoebat Archeologists have declared that they have discovered the bones of St. Peter in a one thousand year old church in Rome...

The Majority Of Catholics In The UK Officially Support Men Sodomizing Each Other And Murdering Babies

<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/London_Pride_2015_4582-e1505251637765.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-113919" height="291" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/London_Pride_2015_4582-e1505251637765-300x291.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/London_Pride_2015_4582-e1505251637765-300x291.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/London_Pride_2015_4582-e1505251637765-768x745.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/London_Pride_2015_4582-e1505251637765-1024x993.jpg 1024w" width="300" /></a>The majority of Catholics in Britain officially support both abortion and homosexuality according to a recent study:<blockquote>Most British Catholics now back abortion, according to a new census which shows a dramatic shift in Christians' social views.For the first time a majority of Catholics – who typically hold to conservative views on issues of life and death – agreed 'the law should allow an abortion if the woman decides . . . she does not wish to have a child'.It comes after Jacob Rees-Mogg, tipped to be a contender for leader of the Conservative Party, explained his staunch opposition to same-sex marriage and abortion by saying he followed the teachings of the Catholic Church.The 2016 British Social Attitudes survey showed an increase in support for abortion among Catholics rise from 39 per cent when the question was last asked in 2012 in 61 per cent last year. The level of approval is only slightly lower than among those with no religion – 70 per cent of who back abortion according to the same survey.The sudden rise comes after British Catholics views on abortion had remained relatively steady over the previous 30 years with the same poll in 1985 finding 33 per cent said a woman has a right to have an abortion.In 1985 the proportion of those with no religion who backed abortion was 57 per cent after a significant shift in both the law and public perception following the 1967 Abortion Act that made termination permissible in certain circumstances.The survey also found a majority of Anglicans saying gay relationships were 'not wrong at all' for the first time. The same study found a 50-50 split in 2015 with support among those of no religion at 76 per cent.Meanwhile support for gay couples among Catholics continues to rise with 62 per cent backing same-sex relationships after crossing the 50 per cent marker in 2013.However the official position of the Catholic Church remains resolutely opposed to both abortion and gay marriage and the Church of England has promised a more welcoming attitude to gay people but has offered no change to its stance against same-sex weddings. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.christiantoday.com/article/most.catholics.now.back.abortion.poll/113474.htm">source</a>)</blockquote>This is a very disturbing development in the UK, but not a surprise, for as the article itself notes, the change is generational, and the younger a person is the more one is likely to support these particular ideas.Catholicism in the UK has been under strain since the Protestant revolution, and the issue of the English Revolution was the same as it was of Luther's rebellion, for it was less about religion or actual problems in the religious hierarchy, but instead about making the Church subject to the will of the crown, and obedience to the King synonymous with obedience to God. This is also not a new problem historically speaking, and was the cause of many martyrs, including the martyrdom of St. Thomas Becket over his conflict with King Henry II. The difference with the time of St. Thomas Becket and King Henry VIII is that King Henry's revolt was successful in subjugating the people and expelling the Church. This was the end of Christendom, because the fracturing caused by the Protestant movement allowed each man to create his own "church" acting as his own, self-appointed, independent authority. As such, it would only come in time and naturally so that without any historical context and sacred tradition coming from the apostles and transmitted throughout the ages that a man could reject any authority he disagreed with merely on his own opinion and appoint himself priest, bishop, and pope and claim the Bible supports him because it is simply a matter of one opinion against another.The Catholic Church in the UK has suffered many persecutions since the Revolution, being virtually stamped out in ways seen only in Islamic lands. It was not until 1829 that some of the anti-Catholic laws were overturned or notably loosened and has made continual improvements, but there are still may problems with the state of the Church, most notably a decline in church attendance, a falling population, and a rise of secularism.These things did not happen just out of nothing, because secularism does not just "pop up" from among a religious people. It has roots and origins, and the simple answer is that being Catholic for many English people became a symbol of group and social, or in the case of many Irish, ethnic identity instead of religious belief. People associated with the Faith because it was part of "their group" and not because they actually believe in what it teaches. This has been a historical problem for the Church just like heresy, just as weeds are a constant problem for a gardener. It is necessary to pick the weeds out of the garden to keep it healthy just as it is necessary to identify and confront the heresies of each time, for it is when they are left unattended that it becomes a dangerous problem.English Catholicism is not declining because of just "natural causes," but it is because people simply do not believe. That is the reason that in addition to the decline a majority of the people support homosexuality and abortion and nearly the same rates as the general population, because there is no difference between them and the average pagan other than a mere, superficial group association.People talk about the rise of Islam, but the fact is the rise of Islam could not happen unless there was a void left by the Church for it to fill. The fact is that the state of the Catholic Church in the UK is a reflection of the people as well as that of the work of the clergy, and everything points to a lack of believe in the faith, from simple points to complex ones. There are many Catholics, but one can say that many do not believe, especially among the younger ones.Certainly as long as a man lives there is hope, but the writing is on the wall. Barring an absolute change, there will not be so much of a decline in the Church as a natural disappearance from that nation, as there will no longer be a purpose or difference in going to church than being a secular pagan.

anonymous armageddon isis islam war The Majority Of Catholics In The UK Officially Support Men Sodomizing Each Other And Murdering Babies

The majority of Catholics in Britain officially support both abortion and homosexuality according to a recent study: Most British Catho...

Catholic Priest Held Prisoner By Muslim Terrorists For Over A Year Finally Released

<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/fr-tom.png"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-113916" height="229" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/fr-tom-300x229.png" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/fr-tom-300x229.png 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/fr-tom.png 615w" width="300" /></a>We have followed the long story of Fr. Tom Uzhunnalil, a Catholic priest who was taken hostage by Muslim terrorists in March 2016. As of the most recent report, he was close to death.However, in a turn of good news, Fr. Tom has been finally rescued and is flying home to India according to a recent report:<blockquote>The kidnapped Indian priest, Father Tom Uzhunnalil, has been freed from captivity and flown to Oman, the country's government and church figures have confirmed.Fr Tom was kidnapped in March 2016 when his care home in the Yemeni city of Aden came under attack. Four gunmen killed four Indian nuns, two Yemeni staff members, eight elderly residents and a security guard, while posing as relatives of one of the residents.In May this year, an online video showed the priest in poor health, appealing for help. 'My health condition is deteriorating quickly and I require hospitalisation as early as possible,' he said.Now the Omani government has reported that it has found and freed Fr Tom.The Arab sultanate said in a statement: 'In response to the Royal Orders of His Majesty Sultan Qaboos bin Said and as per a request from the Vatican to assist in the rescuing of a Vatican employee, the concerned authorities in the Sultanate, in coordination with the Yemeni authorities, have managed to find a Vatican government employee.'He was transferred this morning to Muscat in preparation for his return home.'India's Foreign Minister today tweeted confirmation of the release. Sushma Swaraj, who had insisted during recent months that the Indian government knew who was holding Fr Tom, tweeted: 'I am happy to inform that Fr Tom Uzhunnalil has been rescued.'Meanwhile, the Catholic Church in the UAE, Oman and Yemen issued a statement from the local Bishop Paul Hinder saying that he 'is happy to inform that Fr Tom Uzhunnalil SDB, who was abducted during the attack on the Care Home run by the Missionaries of Charity in Aden, Yemen on 4th March 2016 has been released today. He is now is safe hands.'The Bishop thanks all those who were involved in the release efforts and all those all over the world who prayed unceasingly for the safe release of Fr Tom. More details are awaited and will be released as and when available.'According to reports, Fr Tom will be flown back to Kerala in India later today.He was reportedly set free after the intervention of the Oman foreign ministry.A daily newspaper in the Gulf country, Oman Observer, reported that the priest thanked God as well as his brothers and sisters and all relatives and friends.Cardinal Baselios Cleemis, the Major Archbishop of the Syro-Malankara Catholic Church, told the Catholic news website Crux today: 'God has answered our prayers. We thank the Government of India. The Honorable Minister of Foreign Affairs took personal interest in securing the release of Fr Tom.'And Sister Mary Prema Pierick, the superior general of the Missionaries of Charity, said she was overwhelmed by the good news. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.christiantoday.com/article/released.fr.tom.uzhunnalil.kidnapped.indian.priest.is.free/113560.htm">source</a>)</blockquote>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Catholic Priest Held Prisoner By Muslim Terrorists For Over A Year Finally Released

We have followed the long story of Fr. Tom Uzhunnalil, a Catholic priest who was taken hostage by Muslim terrorists in March 2016. As o...

The LGBT Is Complicit In The Spread Of Horrible Diseases, The Sodomy Laws Need To Come Back For The Sake Of Public Health

<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Anti-LGBT-people.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-113909" height="158" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Anti-LGBT-people-300x158.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Anti-LGBT-people-300x158.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Anti-LGBT-people.jpg 760w" width="300" /></a>The Pew Forum recently released a study about the Sodomy Laws in the USA, arguing over whether or not they should be further repealed:<blockquote>The laws, which date to the 1980s and ’90s, vary greatly from state to state. Most impose criminal penalties on people who know their HIV status and potentially expose others to the virus. In some states, a conviction can mean up to 35 years in prison.Twenty-four states require HIV-positive people to disclose their status to sexual partners, while six states require people to register as sex offenders as part of their punishment if they are convicted of an HIV-specific crime. In 22 states, felony laws, which cover assault and attempted murder for example, are used to prosecute people living with HIV who knowingly expose someone to the virus. And 25 states criminalize activities such as spitting, even though they are unlikely to transmit the virus.Other states have statutes that tack on extra punishment based on the defendant’s HIV status. In Utah, for example, HIV-positive people convicted of prostitution, patronizing a prostitute, or solicitation are guilty of a felony, punishable by up to five years in prison, if they knew their status at the time of the crime. For an HIV-negative person, those same crimes would be a misdemeanor punishable by no more than six months in prison for a first-time offense.Critics say the laws are relics of the past and demonize people infected with the virus. Some studies have shown that the laws don’t reduce HIV transmission and may actually drive up HIV rates, because people who feel stigmatized are less likely to get tested. A study published in June by researchers with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found no evidence that the laws reduce transmission of the virus.“It’s very embarrassing and dehumanizing,” said Suttle, 38, who now lives in Harlem, New York, and works as an assistant director for the Sero Project, which advocates to end laws that criminalize people living with the virus.In 1994, Texas became the first state to repeal its HIV criminal laws, according to the Center for HIV Law and Policy. But since then, people have been prosecuted for HIV exposure under general criminal laws such as attempted murder, which Catherine Hanssens, the center’s executive director, said illustrates why straight repeal of the laws is not enough. Texas courts have upheld that seminal fluid of a man living with HIV may constitute a deadly weapon.In 2012, Illinois became the second state to revise its HIV crime laws, by requiring prosecutors to prove a defendant intended to transmit HIV and limiting prosecution to a more narrow definition of sexual activity. Iowa followed suit in 2014. Last year, Colorado enacted a law that repealed two HIV criminalization statutes and revised another by requiring that all sexually transmitted infections be treated equally under the law, rather than singling out HIV for prosecution.California lawmakers are also considering a bill that would make it a misdemeanor to transmit HIV, rather than a felony. A similar HIV bill failed in Florida in May, but is expected to be re-introduced in the next session.Also in May, the Ohio Supreme Court heard arguments in a case challenging the state’s criminal HIV law. The crux of the case: whether or not the law discriminates against people living with HIV, as well as whether requiring disclosure of one’s HIV status violates the First Amendment.The push to reform HIV crime statutes “has become a national movement, and it’s part of the larger conversation about overcriminalizing people,” said Allison Nichol, law and policy counsel for the Sero Project.“We need to take this out of the realm of someone committing a sex crime,” said Nichol, who used to prosecute sex crimes in Indianapolis. “These laws continue to feed a false narrative that people with HIV present a danger to public health, when in fact that is no longer true.”But supporters of the laws argue they protect public health, and some states have moved in the opposite direction.In May, Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican, signed a law that, among other things, authorizes a judge to issue an emergency order to get someone tested for HIV if it’s believed that person has “caused exposure to a victim.” The law updates a previous one and is intended to treat rape victims who may have contracted HIV or hepatitis C. The same month, Tennessee enacted a law strengthening a statute requiring anyone who’s been arrested to be tested for HIV/AIDS if a law enforcement officer requests it.“We’re talking about a criminal,” said Maggi Duncan, executive director of the Tennessee Association of Police Chiefs, who helped draft the legislation. “In the course of being arrested, they could have possibly exposed a first responder.”The law was expanded to include all forms of hepatitis, which is on the rise in the state, Duncan said, “but HIV could easily become on the rise again with needle use, and that’s a real concern with heroin being on the upswing.”Activists have pushed for years to change the laws, with a focus on educating lawmakers and prosecutors about how HIV is transmitted. One key fact: An HIV-positive person whose viral load is undetectable has almost no chance of spreading the virus.“More and more, there’s a realization that HIV criminalization laws have not kept up with science,” said Dan Kirk, a former prosecutor with the office of the Cook County State’s Attorney, which has jurisdiction over Chicago. Last year, then-Cook County State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez called for the law to be revised further.Today, prosecutors in Illinois have to prove that an offender intended to transmit HIV. Defendants can assert a legal defense if a condom was used, but they cannot use being in treatment as a defense. This despite condoms being less effective — 80 percent — than anti-retroviral drug treatment — 95 percent — at reducing the risk of transmission, according to the CDC.Under the measure pending in California, it would no longer be a felony to fail to disclose a positive HIV status. Instead it would be a misdemeanor on a par with failing to disclose any other transmitted disease. To be charged with a misdemeanor, the defendant must have known that he or she has a communicable disease and acted with the specific intent to infect another person, engaged in conduct that poses a substantial risk for transmission, and actually transmitted the disease to another person.“We want people to get tested. We want people to get on medication. We want people to be honest about their HIV status,” said California state Sen. Scott Wiener, a Democrat who sponsored the legislation. “But you don’t accomplish those things by sending people to prison.” (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2017/09/06/hiv-crime-laws-historical-relics-or-public-safety-measures">source</a>)</blockquote>As we have explained many times, our opposition to homosexuality at Shoebat.com is strictly based on the Catholic Faith. We desire to live and speak about our Faith as correctly as we can, and in order to do this we hold to the teachings of the Faith whether they are popular or not. Sacred Scripture and Tradition make abundantly clear the gravity of the sin that is homosexuality. It is a sin that is only one of four in the Bible that explicitly cries out to Heaven for vengeance. It is specifically named in both the Old and New Testaments as a sign of grave evil in a man. It has been roundly condemned by the Church throughout the ages. It is listed as a sin so hateful by the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/08/14/major-left-wing-blogger-calls-st-catherine-of-siena-an-intolerant-bigot-and-a-right-wing-extremist/">saints that even the demons despise it</a>.But as the article notes, there is another aspect of the sodomy laws, which is the angle of public health.Sodomy is the act of masturbating by means of the place where another man has bowel movements. It is essentially the act of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/07/12/major-magazine-declares-to-teenagers-sodomy-is-good-for-you-sex-with-fecal-matter-is-normal-and-you-should-try-it/">masturbating with poop</a>. Poop is the waste product of human biological functions, meaning it contains all of the trash the body cannot use. The rectal region is the biological organ through which waste is safely disposed- it is meant for allowing waste to exit, not having a foreign object vigorously thrust through it and then another man's bodily fluids (which also contain his germs) into it. The act of sodomy, therefore, is an excellent way to cause physical bodily harm as well as through which to directly and effectively transmit disease from one person to another.The deceased <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.amazon.com/AIDS-The-Unnecessary-Epidemic-Monteith/dp/0925591173">Dr. Stanley Monteith, author of AIDS: The Unnecessary Epidemic</a>, notes that the spread of HIV/AIDS began in homosexual communities, and that while he an a few others recommended shutting down places where homosexual activity is known to take place, it would help limit the spread of the disease. However, this did not happen, and as such the virus has continued to spread.Likewise, as we have noted in our articles by the direct admission of LGBT activists themselves,<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/08/09/scientists-in-shock-as-colon-and-rectal-cancer-rates-skyrocket-among-younger-people-and-nobody-wants-to-explain-why/"> HIV/AIDS was normalized in American society and around the world by the LGBT</a>, and that is because they were the ones which bore the primary responsibility for spreading the disease due to their obsession with committing this immoral, unclean, and dangerous behavior. This is combination with the fact that those on medication for HIV continue to engage in homosexual activity has lead to the creation of many forms of drug-resistant bacteria, including stronger forms of HIV/AIDS. It addition to HIV, it has also caused a dramatic increase in other diseases, such as <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/08/11/irelands-first-lgbt-prime-minister-declares-babies-dont-deserve-to-live-because-they-dont-have-the-same-human-rights/">in colon cancer rates</a>.Make no mistake, the objection that we have to the LGBT is based on the Catholic Faith- if God is the author of all creation, certainly He has a right to designate what is a sin and what is not a sin. Since God is perfect, ordered, and orders all things to a good end, the severe condemnation of homosexual activity is on account of the fact that it is a misuse of His creation, taking that which is meant to transmit life and instead using it to transmit death and disease, for the public health crisis is simply an extension of the moral crisis. This is likewise the reason why these laws have been struck down in the USA and many other nations, not because they are an attempt to stop a public health crisis, but because the licentious behavior of the people naturally gives way to progressively increasing forms of disorder, including homosexual activity.While no government is perfect, the fact is that Sodomy Laws are in a social sense are as much a reflection of the beliefs of the people and their respect of their Creator as they are about basic public health. While it is ultimately the belief that matters and serves as the basis for the laws, the laws provide the temporal application of this belief and the effect of this application is that by curbing the public license on homosexual activity one of the fruits is a reduction in the spread of diseases such as HIV/AIDS.Take note of how in the article it is LGBT activists who are most aggressively pushing to have the Sodomy Laws abolished on the reasoning of 'it's unequal,' when the reality is that nothing could be further from the truth. Their opposition is not because they believe there is an objective, scientific reason that says homosexuality does not transmit disease. Indeed, the evidence is far to the contrary. The reason why they are pushing for this is because just a the sodomy laws are a temporal manifestation of a moral philosophy, the LGBT believe license as their morality, applying the Crowlean saying "Do what thou wilt" as their philosophy for life. Such a philosophy is immoral, evil, and ultimately anti-Christian and satanic, which is not a surprise at all considering that the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/07/24/major-satanist-group-brags-that-over-half-of-its-members-are-practicing-sodomites/">LGBT is disproportionately represented among them</a>.As with all sin, its wages are death for those who refuse to repent. In this life, unrepentant sin may or not be punished. However, after death, there is no more time.Choose wisely.

anonymous armageddon isis islam war The LGBT Is Complicit In The Spread Of Horrible Diseases, The Sodomy Laws Need To Come Back For The Sake Of Public Health

The Pew Forum recently released a study about the Sodomy Laws in the USA, arguing over whether or not they should be further repealed: ...

Muslim Terrorists Massacre 20 Christians Including Children And A 3-Month-Old Baby Just Because They Could

<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/BH-execution.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-113905" height="150" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/BH-execution-300x150.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/BH-execution-300x150.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/BH-execution.jpg 500w" width="300" /></a>Muslim terrorists violently executed 20 Christians, including children and a 3-month-old baby. They said is was for "revenge" for the death of a Muslim child that happened over a year ago in another village and had nothing to do with the people they killed according to a report:<blockquote>Muslim Fulani herdsmen in central Nigeria’s Plateau state massacred 20 Christians, including children, as they slept in the hours after midnight on Friday (Sept. 8) in an apparent reprisal attack that mystified villagers, sources said.Police reportedly said the attack was an act of vengeance after the discovery last week of a slain and beheaded Fulani boy who was a resident of Ancha village, Miango District in the Bassa Local Government Area. But a village Christian told Morning Star News that the area’s terrified residents were at a loss to explain why they were targeted, as the murder of the Fulani took place at another village.“The village where they claim one of them was killed over a year ago is not part of our village, and we have never had any misunderstanding with them in the past,” said John Bulus, church secretary of Salama Baptist Church-Ancha, which lost 19 members in the massacre.Bulus told Morning Star News that Ancha villagers have never had any problems with the Fulani, who have a settlement a few kilometers away. He was able to recognize some but not all of the assailants, and area villagers believe Islamic extremist militants accompanied the herdsmen.“On Saturday, September 2, while we were working on our fields and farms, we saw the Fulanis moving their cattle and families out of their camp, a settlement that is just some few kilometers away from here,” Bulus said. “So we rushed to them to inquire why the sudden departure from camp. They responded by telling us that one of them was some time ago killed in another village 5 kilometers from our village, hence, their decision to move away.”Bulus said the area Christians returned and continued working.“We never knew that these same Fulanis would return to attack us, as there is nothing that warrants an attack on us,” he said.Bulus said nine of the 20 Christians killed were children, ranging in age from 3 months to 17 years old. Along with the 19 Baptists killed, one was member of a Methodist church, he said.Awoken by the sound of gunshots shortly after midnight on Friday (Sept. 8), Bulus quickly went outside to see who was shooting. He said he saw three persons standing with guns in their hands, and that he stood quietly watching them until they shot at him, nearly hitting him before he ran back into his house.“One of them ran after me into the house, and he stood by the door to my room without entering the room or shooting, and after a few minutes he went out to join his colleagues outside,” he said. “And just as I was thinking about what to do, I heard sporadic gun shots all over the village. They were shooting everywhere in the village and this lasted for about 25 minutes.”The assailants were talking to each other in the Fulani language, he said, adding that from the light of a bright moon, he was able to see that some of the attackers were area Fulanis.“I can confidently tell you that some of the persons among those who attacked us are local Fulani herdsmen who lived close to our village,” he said.About five minutes after the shooting stopped, he saw the assailants had gathered at a spot just outside the pathway that leads into the village and then they left. Bulus and others went from house to house to determine any casualties.“We found out that 20 persons were killed, and six others were grievously injured,” he said. “We found that those killed were from three households. We have in all, 50 households in this village.”Children killed, he said, were Sati Ishaya, 9; Aveh Ishaya, 5; Azumi Monday, 3 months old; Lami Monday, 3; Emmanuel Sunday, 6; Ishaya Sunday, 8; Friday John, 17; Ayo John, 10; Deba John, 7.Also slain were Bulus Rohun, 50; Laraba Bulus, 45; Musa Ishaya, 21; Gado Odo, 75; Sei Musa, 19; Kande Ahmadu, 48; Ishaya Ahmadu, 40; Bala Ishaya,18. Tina Monday, 20; Lami Ishaya, 40; and Ahmadu Rohun, 80.Bulus gave the names of the six Christians injured during the attack as Talatu Gado, 60; Mai’angwa Monday, 16; Talatu John, 46; Monday Ahmadu, 24; Vou Monday, 4; and Tina Ahmadu, 28.Plateau Commissioner of Police Peter Ogunyanwo told reporters that the slain Fulani boy that triggered the attack was from Ancha village, was reported missing Aug. 3 and that his body was found three days before the Sept. 8 massacre. Some Nigerian press reported the boy’s body was found in Dantanko village.“We are investigating the matter, but from our findings so far, the attack was carried out by Fulani herdsmen to avenge the killing of a young boy,” Ogunyanwo said.He appeared to under-report the number of children killed, saying there were only seven, and that only five persons had been injured. The official said five suspects had been arrested over the missing Fulani boy, but that no one had been detained in the Ancha massacre. Christians make up 51.3 percent of Nigeria’s population, while Muslims living primarily in the north and middle belt account for 45 percent. Nigeria ranks 12th on Open Doors’ 2017 World Watch List of countries where Christians suffer the most persecution. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://morningstarnews.org/2017/09/muslim-fulani-herdsmen-massacre-20-christians-plateau-state-nigeria/">source</a>)</blockquote>Barring other details, it appears this was a case all too commmon, which was that the death of the Muslim child was used as an excuse to massacre Christians as a whole. They just happened to be the village that was chosen.

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Muslim Terrorists Massacre 20 Christians Including Children And A 3-Month-Old Baby Just Because They Could

Muslim terrorists violently executed 20 Christians, including children and a 3-month-old baby. They said is was for "revenge"...

Mother Stabs Her 8-Day-Old Baby In The Face With A Kitchen Knife, Says 'God Told Me To Stab The Baby In The Face And Dismember Him Because He Is From Satan'

<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/14881488_G.png"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-113899" height="169" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/14881488_G-300x169.png" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/14881488_G-300x169.png 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/14881488_G.png 640w" width="300" /></a>A woman was arrested after stabbing her eight-day-old baby in the face with a kitchen knife. She told police that God told her to kill the baby and dismember him because he was the 'devil's child' according to a recent report:<blockquote>A mother is facing charges after police say she stabbed her one-week-old baby in Swissvale on Friday.Tanishia Fielder, 32, is in jail Saturday, charged with stabbing her 8-day-old baby boy in the face.The baby is being treated at Children’s Hospital. The child’s condition is unknown.It happened in a second-floor apartment in the 7500 block of Melrose Street.Fielder admitted to the crime, according to police. She said she used a kitchen knife. Police later recovered a knife under a dumpster behind the Melrose Street apartment building.“’It was the Devil’s child.’ That just kept coming out of her mouth,” neighbor Darius Warren said. “I’m like, ‘Wow, that’s crazy.’”Warren said he knew the mother and he couldn’t believe what happened.“It was devastated. I never seen anything like that before, especially from her,” he said. “I never would have expected that.”A criminal complaint said the baby sustained knife wounds near the right eye. Fielder was quoted by police saying, “I stabbed the baby. That’s the Devil’s baby.”She explained the crime to police, saying God told her she needed to kill the baby, dismember him and throw him in the garbage because he was by the Devil.The father of the infant told police that he and Fielder got into an argument earlier in the day on Friday, and he saw her with a knife. He said she chased him with the knife, and he saw the baby stabbed and bleeding.Warren called 911 for help when he saw the father run outside with the baby.“When the husband came out, I guess, he was holding the baby, running down, and the baby had blood in his eyes and stuff,” Warren said. “[The father was] screaming ‘911, call 911,’ so I called 911. Then when I asked the lady what was going on, she kept saying, ‘It’s Satan’s child, it’s Satan’s child’ and all that.”Fielder is facing multiple charges. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2017/09/09/swissvale-mother-stabs-baby-devil/">source</a>)</blockquote>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Mother Stabs Her 8-Day-Old Baby In The Face With A Kitchen Knife, Says 'God Told Me To Stab The Baby In The Face And Dismember Him Because He Is From Satan'

A woman was arrested after stabbing her eight-day-old baby in the face with a kitchen knife. She told police that God told her to kill ...