Catholic Priest Caught Taking 13 Year Old Girl To Have Sex With Her

<div id="attachment_113223" style="width: 688px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Monsignor-Arnel-Lagarejo-678x381.jpg"><img alt="" class="size-full wp-image-113223" height="381" sizes="(max-width: 678px) 100vw, 678px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Monsignor-Arnel-Lagarejo-678x381.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Monsignor-Arnel-Lagarejo-678x381.jpg 678w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Monsignor-Arnel-Lagarejo-678x381-300x169.jpg 300w" width="678" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Monsignor Arnel Lagarejo was arrested in the Philippines on Friday during a joint operation by police and the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) after the child’s mother contacted authorities. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://yournewswire.com/police-catch-catholic-priest-bringing-minor-to-motel-for-sex/">Source</a>)</p></div><p>CORRECTION: It was not a Catholic priest who did this, but an aglipaya priest.</p><p>A Catholic priest was caught driving a 13 year old girl to a motel for sex, as we read in one report:</p><blockquote><div class="article__summary summary ">A Catholic priest in the Philippines was caught by police allegedly driving a 13-year-old girl to a motel to have sex after paying her 16-year-old pimp.</div></blockquote><div class="article__text text js-mediator-article"><blockquote><p>Monsignor Arnel Lagarejo was arrested Friday in a joint operation by Marikina police and the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) after the victim’s mother contacted authorities.</p><p>The priest, president of Cainta Catholic College and parish priest of St. John The Baptist, faces charges of violating the Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act of 2003.</p><p>Eastern Police District Director Chief Superintendent Romulo Sapitula said Lagarejos found the 16-year-old pimp on social media, reports PhilStar.</p><p>The Diocese of Antipolo issued a statement noting the seriousness of the incident and expressing its willingness to cooperate with investigating authorities. It confirmed that Lagarejos has been relieved of all of his duties in the diocese.</p><p>Lagarejos is also <em>“forbidden from having contact with all but his lawyer, his brother-priests, and church authorities. He is particularly forbidden from any communication with minors and from maintaining company with them in any way whatsoever.”</em></p><p>The diocese said it does <em>“not in any way condone or abet the trafficking in persons, particularly of minors, nor protect the offenders from prosecution, and subsequent trial and punishment when evidence so warrants.”</em></p></blockquote><div class="columns__content"><div class="article "><div class="article__text text js-mediator-article"><blockquote><p>Meanwhile, a separate inquiry will be carried out by the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines (CBCP). Church authorities say this will be conducted independently of whatever conclusions may be reached by the police, and will be submitted to the Vatican upon completion.</p><p>Lagarejos has been released on bail after three days in police custody and is due to appear in Marikina court on August 3. Church officials told Rappler that they did not provide the bail money.</p></blockquote><p>There are many people in the Christian world, claiming Christianity, and promoting perversity and degeneracy.</p><p>Very recently Robert Spencer, who was a deacon for the Catholic Church, wrote an article for PJ Media, openly promoting homosexual pornographic material. Of course, the article is guised as being "Counterjihad," while at the same time pushing for perverted and degenerate homosexual writing. The article is entitled, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2017/06/29/when-a-gay-playwright-discovers-islamic-jihad/">"When a Gay Playwright Discovers Islamic Jihad,"</a> and its actually a review for a homosexual novel written by sodomite activist Bruce Bawer, who was actually one of the major devisers of the sodomite marriage movement.</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/spencer-sodom.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter wp-image-112355" height="535" sizes="(max-width: 393px) 100vw, 393px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/spencer-sodom-752x1024.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/spencer-sodom-752x1024.jpg 752w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/spencer-sodom-220x300.jpg 220w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/spencer-sodom-768x1045.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/spencer-sodom.jpg 930w" width="393" /></a></p><p>Spencer describes the author and the book as such: "Bruce Bawer is to be commended for his honesty and courage in writing this superb novel." Robert Spencer expresses his own anti-Christian hatred in this line of his perverted article:</p><blockquote><p>"Bawer is the author of the 1997 book <em>Stealing Jesus: How Fundamentalism Betrays Christianity</em> -- an eloquent, impassioned rebuke to the judgmental fundamentalism in which, Bawer contended, all too many Christians place adherence to dogma, in particular that of the sinfulness of homosexual activity, above the demands of Christian charity."</p></blockquote><p>An anti-Christian book is described by Spencer, a supposed Catholic, as "an eloquent, impassioned rebuke" to "judgmental fundamentalism". A Christian would never describe a sodomite book with such words. Spencer then writes of the book's "many other passages" as having "full awareness of the jihadi belief system and mindset," since it is about a sodomite named Steve who, while partaking in vile acts, learns the truth about the jihadist threat. Spencer, who obviously read the sodomite book, writes: "One of Steve’s numerous harrowing encounters takes place when his search for one of the jihad plotters leads him to a gay sauna in Munich."</p><p>Sodomite saunas? Really Robert? This is perversity. Such reprobate drivel fits right into the deranged ways of the Counterjihad movement, which is nothing but a propaganda machine to spread perversity and genocidal ideology. It is obvious that Spencer read this book, and its obvious that it is perverted. Spencer is now in the business of promoting homosexual pornographic literature. Here is just one part of the book, just to show you what perversion Spencer is promoting, and how degenerate and depraved Robert Spencer really is:</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/spencer-2.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter wp-image-112356" height="491" sizes="(max-width: 499px) 100vw, 499px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/spencer-2-1024x1008.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/spencer-2-1024x1008.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/spencer-2-300x295.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/spencer-2-768x756.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/spencer-2.jpg 1032w" width="499" /></a></p><p>In Robert Spencer's article he writes of how the novel has a plot in which Muslim terrorists want to kill "gay anti-Islam politician". And in this disgusting book, it speaks of this politician sodomizing men, and this horrific promotion of degeneracy and utter vile sickness worthy of death, is being advocated by Robert Spencer. Here is a photo of the book's pederastic sickness:</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/spencer-sodomite.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter wp-image-112358" height="428" sizes="(max-width: 581px) 100vw, 581px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/spencer-sodomite-1024x755.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/spencer-sodomite-1024x755.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/spencer-sodomite-300x221.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/spencer-sodomite-768x567.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/spencer-sodomite.jpg 1098w" width="581" /></a></p><p>This evil sickness looks like it came straight from some medieval homosexual Islamic text. There is no way that Robert Spencer can promote this evil and be Catholic. He was a deacon in Our Lady of the Cedars Catholic Church. But he no longer serves as a deacon there.</p><p class="p1">We wondered what his priest, Fr. Thomas P. Steinmetz, thought of his work, and so we called him to inquire as to why Spencer no longer serves as a deacon in his parish, Our Lady of the Cedars. As you can see from the video, Steinmetz is both very hesitant and terrified to reveal what happened:</p><p class="p1"><iframe src="http://shoebattube.com/player/embed_player.php?vid=1391&width=660&height=440&autoplay=no" width="660" height="440" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" data-mce-fragment="1"></iframe></p></div></div></div><div class="columns__content"><p>What is enabling evil in society is the onslaught of compliant Christianity. One example of this Michael Brown. He claims to be a man of Christianity, but when someone like myself proclaims the laws of God against homosexuality, he is quick to deny me. He has asked me to "repent," as though following my Lord and His holy destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah is some mortal sin all of a sudden. I eventually debated this heretic, and here it is:</p><p><iframe src="http://shoebattube.com/player/embed_player.php?vid=1161&width=660&height=440&autoplay=no" width="660" height="440" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" data-mce-fragment="1"></iframe></p><p>So many today, fattened by materialism and lost in their own ego, want nothing to do with the holy words of the prophet Moses, nor any of the prophets after him, nor the words of the Apostle who declared that sodomites are worthy of death, but continuously want to teach the precepts of a vain secular moralism. I am not speaking of the atheist who denies everything holy and whose blasphemies are expected; I am speaking of supposed “Christians” who carry the title of conservative and who tout themselves as advocates for family values, while at the same time exert themselves to please the sodomites and the acolytes of perversion as they try to censure those who honor the laws of God.</p><p>I myself have dealt with this numerous times. I remember when I posted my video of me calling thirteen pro-homosexual and homosexual bakeries and asking them for a cake that says “Gay marriage is wrong,” and being denied service every time. The video went viral. Not too long after this happened, Janet Porter a well known conservative personality who I respect, contacted me asking if I would allow her to use clips of my video to add to her documentary exposing the homosexual agenda. I said it would be no problem. The documentary has been out for some time and has already had showings in select theaters in the United States.</p><p>But then, the spirit of fear crept its way inside. Peter LaBarbera, an Evangelical who is in the documentary, was confronted by the leftist media on the fact he is in the same documentary with me, the man who believes in God’s law that says that sodomites are to be put to death. Instead of defending the law of the Bible, which he claims to believe, this hireling decided to push for me to recant my statements, and said that if I didn’t that I should be removed from the documentary. Janet called me urging me to make a statement to “clarify” what I really believed, that I really don’t believe in the death penalty for sodomites, but simply in the anti-sodomy laws that were once enacted in Texas.</p><p>To be honest I was quite hesitant to do this because to do so would mean recanting all of my writings in support for the death penalty. Janet sent me the first draft of the statement to receive my stamp of approval. The draft stated:</p><blockquote><p>“While I have had homosexual activists call for my death and beheading, etc., I have not called for anyone to take the life of those practicing homosexual behavior. I do want the laws of the United States to once again make sodomy illegal as they did prior to the 2003 Lawrence v. Texas ruling because such practice is not only immoral, but physically dangerous, as well.”</p></blockquote><p>But Peter LaBarbera objected to the draft and expressed his dissatisfaction with it, pushing for me to recant my position that an inquisition should be established to uproot homosexuality and other perversities. Peter LaBarbera responded to the draft with this email to Janet:</p><blockquote><p>“Not good enough, if he called for an "Inquisition" against homosexuals. We need to look at the exact comments and craft a statement based on those. I do not have time to do that today or tomorrow as I'm driving to DC. We need transcripts of the exact comments and then he needs to disavow that approach (or clarify what he meant). Otherwise people will keep asking about those specific comments.”</p></blockquote><div id="attachment_87460" style="width: 584px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/peter_labarbera1.jpg"><img alt="Peter Labarbera, more afraid of the sodomites than the law of God" class="size-full wp-image-87460" height="600" sizes="(max-width: 574px) 100vw, 574px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/peter_labarbera1.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/peter_labarbera1.jpg 574w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/peter_labarbera1-287x300.jpg 287w" width="574" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Peter Labarbera, more afraid of the sodomites than the law of God</p></div><p>All of these words are filled with fear. LaBarbera is afraid of negative attention from the leftist media. Such behavior is contrary to God, Who is Love, “because perfect love expels all fear.” (1 John 4:18) Why should a Christian be afraid or ashamed of the law of God which states that “If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death” (Leviticus 20:13)? Why should a Christian be ashamed of the words of the Apostle when he said that homosexuals do things that “are worthy of death” (Romans 1:32)? They will say that such words are against love. But how could a Christian use such argumentation when St. Paul himself says that “the purpose of the commandment is love” (1 Timothy 1:5), and in the same epistle goes on to say that “we know that the law is good if one uses it lawfully, knowing this: that the law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless and insubordinate, for the ungodly and for sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, for fornicators, for sodomites” (1 Timothy 1:8-10)?</p><p>In Christianity, love and justice and indistinguishable, for all virtues, be it justice, charity or endurance, are in love, for God is Love, and in God is all virtue. So how could such Christians say that I am against love, when the purpose of the law is love, and this very law declares that sodomites are worthy of death?</p><p>Peter LaBarbera was blocked from entering Canada, and he goes before the media showing how persecuted he is, but yet he wants to block me — a Christian — from being in a documentary for being more politically incorrect than him. And at the same time, he kisses the feet of the sodomite to deny me as Peter denied Christ. A filthy sodomite who calls himself “Joe My God”, began to attack LaBarbera for being in the documentary with me. Peter LaBarbera quickly went on Twitter to appease the sodomite, even going to far as to address him with the blasphemous title of “Joe My God”:</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/pb-copy.jpg"><img alt="pb copy" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-87453" height="328" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/pb-copy.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/pb-copy.jpg 640w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/pb-copy-300x154.jpg 300w" width="640" /></a></p><p>Why would a Christian address an evil person with such a blasphemous title as "Joe My God"? It is truly pathetic how these modern Christians get on their hands and knees for these useless sodomites. The sodomites make up such a small part of the population, and yet the Christians, who are supposedly the majority, are terrified of them. Caesar wanted the whole world to address him as <em>kyrios</em>, or lord. And yet you never see any of the early Christians ever address Caesar as kyrios. In fact, St. Paul went directly against this idea when he said "that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord" (Philippians 2:11), that is that Christ is Kyrios. Yet this Peter LaBarbera wants to do an inquisition on me, firmly saying "We need to look at the exact comments" and "We need transcripts of the exact comments and then he [Theodore Shoebat] needs to disavow that approach", while at the same time he runs to some sodomite to get his approval. What an absolutely pathetic person. Peter LaBarbera does not want to respect God, but rather "Joe My God".</p><p>This is why the Christians keep losing ground and the sodomites keep gaining ground. Instead of using the attention that controversy brings, Christians run away from controversy. This is why Christendom is drowning.</p><p>Another example of this demonic infiltration is Michael Coren, a heretic who lied about being Catholic while holding a position as a news host in Canada. He wrote numerous books about how great Catholicism is, and while praising the Catholic faith, he was attending Anglican church services. Now he has declared his renunciation of the Catholic faith, and has become an open agent for the sodomite religion. He expressed his leaving the Catholic Church by saying, “I could not remain in a church that effectively excluded gay people,” and also saying “I felt a hypocrite being part of a church that described homosexual relations as being disordered and sinful. I just couldn’t be part of it anymore.”</p><p>So Michael Coren has become an ambassador for the sodomites. Michael Coren is also a betraying, superficial effeminate. He denied me and turned his back on me as he cowered in the presence of two Muslims on Canadian television, when they berated him for referencing our website, shoebat.com. Here is the video:</p><p><iframe src="http://shoebattube.com/player/embed_player.php?vid=1127&width=660&height=440&autoplay=no" width="660" height="440" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" data-mce-fragment="1"></iframe></p><div id="attachment_90461" style="width: 629px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/348.jpeg" rel="attachment wp-att-90461"><img alt="Michael Coren, false Christian, cowered before Muslims, agent of homosexuality and acolyte of the Antichrist. " class="size-full wp-image-90461" height="348" sizes="(max-width: 619px) 100vw, 619px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/348.jpeg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/348.jpeg 619w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/348-300x169.jpeg 300w" width="619" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Michael Coren, false Christian, cowered before Muslims, agent of homosexuality and acolyte of the Antichrist.</p></div><p>If Michael Coren will betray me for saying that pagan Muslim Albanians need annihilation, then he most certainly will betray Moses for slaughtering the calf worshippers; he most certainly will betray Joshua for exterminating the Canaanites; he most certainly will betray Jehu and Elijah for killing the priests of Baal; and he most definitely has betrayed God Himself, for God ordered the extermination of the wicked.</p><p>I wrote an email to Michael Coren, telling him:</p><blockquote><p>I saw your debate with Shabir Ali and the other Muslim. I have always considered you an ally, and still do. But I must tell you one thing: The cock crowed three times, and you denied me thrice.</p></blockquote><p>Michael Coren responded to me fearfully, like a shaking dog, saying:</p><blockquote><p>I think we should speak. Is there a number I can call you on later today? Please hear my side before you condemn me. Michael.</p></blockquote><p>I heard his side of the story on the phone and left it at that. I had no intentions at that point to make any actions against him. But after seeing how he is now advancing the sodomite religion and going against Christianity, realizing that his appeal meant nothing, now I must respond to him and confront him for the heretic he is. He is a heretic and the worst kind. There is one heretic that says: "I am a heretic. I hate God." But there is the other type, the more deceptive strand that says, "I love God. I am orthodox. But lets tolerate the enemies of God, lets enable them, empower them, allow them to eclipse the light their darkness." This is the worst type of heretic and the most dangerous kind.</p><p>There are major homosexual rings in the Vatican, what I like to call "homosexual hornets nests." I myself have had experience with the homosexual infiltrators in the Catholic Church.</p><p>While we were doing some work in Texas we were told of a man named Msgr. Michael Yarbrough (also known as Michael Yarborough), of Holy Trinity Catholic Church, and how he is a deviant priest who forcefully kissed a young man named Hector Escalante on the lips, and how he was supporting a pro homosexual group called Call to Action. Here is a photo of Msgr. Michael Yarbrough:</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Msgr.-Mike-Yarbrough.jpg"><img alt="Msgr. Mike Yarbrough" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-72465" height="768" sizes="(max-width: 548px) 100vw, 548px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Msgr.-Mike-Yarbrough.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Msgr.-Mike-Yarbrough.jpg 548w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Msgr.-Mike-Yarbrough-214x300.jpg 214w" width="548" /></a></p><p>Well, we decided that we were going to bait Msgr. Michael Yarbrough. I visited him in a confessional booth where I told him my age and apparently it registered an interest and he asked me if I wanted to come and hang out with him. He fell for the bait. I found it very odd that a priest of his high position, with a very busy schedule, would all of a sudden want to spend time with me.</p><p>I accepted his offer, and gave him a call, and asked him if we would meet at a book store. He said that he preferred that we meet in his office. I found this quite disturbing because it was in his office where he kissed Hector Escalante. When I did research on Msgr. Michael Yarbrough, I found a 2002 report written in the San Antonio Express which <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news3/2002_04_28_Michael_PunishingThe_Fernandez_AND_Ortiz_Dietz_2.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">stated</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Hector Escalante complained that Monsignor Michael Yarbrough kissed him on the lips and groped him <strong>in his office</strong> in 1998 when Escalante was 27, on his last day on the job as a St. Matthew's Parish employee.</p><p>Yarbrough admitted kissing him but said Escalante misunderstood the gesture, which the priest said was common among men in his family. He denied groping Escalante.</p></blockquote><p>Imagine, a man kissing another man on the lips as "common."</p><p>I told Msgr. Michael Yarbrough that it would be better that we meet in a book store, to which he agreed. I asked him how much time he had, and he said, as long as I wanted. After doing some more research, I also found out that on top of kissing a young man on the lips, Msgr. Michael Yarbrough is a also a major donor to a pro homosexual group, called Call to Action, and I found his name on a list made by Call to Action designated as "major donors". I took a snapshot of the list with Msgr. Michael Yarbrough's name highlighted:</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/yarbarough-copy.jpg"><img alt="yarbarough copy" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-72458" height="506" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/yarbarough-copy-1024x506.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/yarbarough-copy-1024x506.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/yarbarough-copy-300x148.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/yarbarough-copy.jpg 1183w" width="1024" /></a></p><p>So, we had the meeting at the bookstore, and after some conversation, I busted him on his heresies and his scandals, and also paid a visit to his church where I was eventually kicked out by his followers (who probably know nothing on how evil this heretic is). Here is the video:</p><p><iframe src="https://vid.me/e/jptA?stats=1" width="660" height="440" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" data-mce-fragment="1"></iframe></p><p>For years we have seen how the Vatican covers up for sexual predators and deviants, heretics and debased theologians. But we have never seen how the agents of the Vatican cover up for such evildoers in their private conversations. Well, Shoebat.com is now giving you this exclusive video showing you how the conniving is really done.</p><p>I confronted Deacon Ron Walker, an official of the Vatican, asking why the Church has done nothing to punish Robert L. Kincl, a priest and canon law judge who was appointed by the Pope himself, who teaches that if two men masturbate each other they do not commit sin, and who himself defended confirmed child molester priest, Fr. Robert Hrdlicka. This is after Shoebat.com filed a complaint against Kincl after we caught him teaching us depravity.</p><p>Deacon Ron Walker and the Bishop of Austin, Joe Vasquez, and Vicar General Daniel Garcia, did nothing to have Robert L. Kincl punished, even after they promised to take care of this evil. Shoebat.com realized that they were just patronizing us and so we made this video.</p><p>Here is the video:</p><p><iframe src="http://shoebattube.com/player/embed_player.php?vid=1002&width=660&height=440&autoplay=no" width="660" height="440" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" data-mce-fragment="1"></iframe></p><p>Robert L. Kincl, who was appointed by the Pope, had befriended us as a fan of Shoebat.com acting as conservative, yet referred to homosexual fondling as permissible in the conversation. Having been shocked at his remarks, I told Kincl:</p><blockquote><p>How can you, as a priest, be so liberal toward such a sick evil as two men fondling each other, or as two men having a "relationship" just as long as they are not going with other men. It is evil and it is reprobate.</p></blockquote><p>I also told him:</p><blockquote><p>It is not tolerable for you, as both a priest and a canon law judge, to be permissive to somebody having a homosexual relationship just as long as they are not being promiscuous with other men. It is deplorable, and in the words of St. Paul, "worthy of death" (Romans 1:32).</p></blockquote><p>Kincl defended his position and responded with a rejection of the Old Testament and a twisting of St. Paul's condemnation of homosexuality in Romans, stating</p><blockquote><p><strong>We do not follow the Hebrew Scriptures.</strong> We follow Jesus Christ <strong>who never mentioned gay relationships.</strong> When St. Paul mentioned such a relationship he was referring to the promiscuousness of the Romans using sodomy.</p></blockquote><p>Shoebat.com decided to investigate Kincl and found that he has a dark past. In 1993, Kincl worked as a Commander in charge of clergy at the U.S. Navy, and while he was in the service he defended another chaplain confirmed to be guilty of child molestation, named Robert Hrdlicka.</p><p>The investigation revealed that Robert L. Kincl had even <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2003/jul/5/20030705-120850-9217r/#ixzz33jCPbVZz" target="_blank" rel="noopener">written the authorities</a>, not to charge the pedophile who molested the young boys, but urged them to send him back to serve as a chaplain:</p><blockquote><p>Catholic chaplain Lt. Robert Hrdlicka pleaded guilty to molesting boys in 1993. Before his sentencing, six other Catholic Navy chaplains and the church’s archbishop for the military services urged authorities to send Lt. Hrdlicka to a church-run treatment center.</p><p>“It is my fervent hope and prayer that he will be able to return to the active ministry as soon as possible,” wrote then-Cmdr. Robert L. Kincl.</p><p>Instead, Lt. Hrdlicka went to prison.</p></blockquote><p>Shoebat.com looked up Kincl's My Life page, to find out that after all these years Kincl is still friends with Hrdlicka the pedophile, since he is on his friends list, of which I took snapshots:</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ted-kincle-photos-4-1-copy.jpg"><img alt="ted kincle photos 4-1 copy" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-53771" height="550" sizes="(max-width: 302px) 100vw, 302px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ted-kincle-photos-4-1-copy.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ted-kincle-photos-4-1-copy.jpg 302w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ted-kincle-photos-4-1-copy-164x300.jpg 164w" width="302" /></a></p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ted-Robert-Hridlicka-copy-2.jpg"><img alt="ted Robert Hridlicka copy 2" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-53761" height="189" sizes="(max-width: 620px) 100vw, 620px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ted-Robert-Hridlicka-copy-2.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ted-Robert-Hridlicka-copy-2.jpg 620w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ted-Robert-Hridlicka-copy-2-300x91.jpg 300w" width="620" /></a></p><p>Just as we have Muslims, like Bergdahl, who have infiltrated the military, we have people like Kincl who have infiltrated both the military and the Catholic Church, with their depravity.</p><p>Kincl is now serving as a priest in <strong>Our Lady's Maronite Catholic Church alongside Msgr. Don Sawyer.</strong> When I confronted Sawyer on Kincl, Sawyer vehemently defended Kincl.</p><div id="attachment_53756" style="width: 395px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/bob-kincl.jpg"><img alt="Robert L. Kincl, depraved priest who defended another child molesting priest " class="size-full wp-image-53756" height="345" sizes="(max-width: 385px) 100vw, 385px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/bob-kincl.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/bob-kincl.jpg 385w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/bob-kincl-300x268.jpg 300w" width="385" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Robert L. Kincl, depraved priest who defended a child molesting priest</p></div><div id="attachment_53759" style="width: 640px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/sawyer-copy.jpg"><img alt="Don Sawyer, Msgr. at Our Lady's Maronite Catholic Church where Kincl serves" class="size-full wp-image-53759" height="353" sizes="(max-width: 630px) 100vw, 630px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/sawyer-copy.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/sawyer-copy.jpg 630w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/sawyer-copy-300x168.jpg 300w" width="630" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Don Sawyer, Msgr. at Our Lady's Maronite Catholic Church where Kincl serves</p></div><p>Shoebat.com decided to contact the Diocese of Austin to file a complaint, and spoke with the Very Reverend Daniel E. Garcia as the Vicar General for the Diocese of Austin, and Chancellor and Secretariat Director for Administration, Deacon Ron Walker, who were under Bishop Joe S. Vásquez of the Diocese of Austin.</p><p>We asked them how could someone who supports homosexuality and defended a pedophile still be serving as a priest and not be excommunicated, to which Deacon Ron Walker, rolling his eyes, said that the Church's main objective would be to reconcile him with God, and not excommunicate him.</p><p>It seems that the Diocese of Austin could care less if one of its priests supports homosexuality and defended a pedophile.</p><div id="attachment_53764" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/7244534_600x338.jpg"><img alt="Bishop Joe S. Vásquez" class="size-full wp-image-53764" height="338" sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/7244534_600x338.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/7244534_600x338.jpg 600w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/7244534_600x338-300x169.jpg 300w" width="600" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Bishop Joe S. Vásquez</p></div><div id="attachment_53766" style="width: 378px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/FrDanny25th1.jpg"><img alt="Vicar General Danny Garcia of the Diocese of Austin" class="size-full wp-image-53766" height="480" sizes="(max-width: 368px) 100vw, 368px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/FrDanny25th1.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/FrDanny25th1.jpg 368w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/FrDanny25th1-230x300.jpg 230w" width="368" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Vicar General Danny Garcia of the Diocese of Austin</p></div><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ron-walker.jpg"><img alt="ron-walker" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-53767" height="285" sizes="(max-width: 450px) 100vw, 450px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ron-walker.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ron-walker.jpg 450w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ron-walker-300x190.jpg 300w" width="450" /></a></p><p>Why is this man serving as a priest when the Catholic Church, in its teachings, forbids homosexuality?</p><p>It is not surprising to see how far reaching homosexuality has gone in the Vatican. What other deviancies will enter the Vatican in the next decade remains to be seen. Whatever happened to normal sin? In the good old days, steeling a chicken perhaps constituted such sin, but these days, its sleeping with it.</p><p>Christianity is not about sycophancy, its about war against evil and the devil. We must arm ourselves to fight in this war.</p>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Catholic Priest Caught Taking 13 Year Old Girl To Have Sex With Her

Monsignor Arnel Lagarejo was arrested in the Philippines on Friday during a joint operation by police and the Department of Social Welf...

Read More...»

Iran Frees Former Muslim Turned Christian After Four Years In Prison

<p style="text-align: center"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/maryam-naghash-zargaran.png"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-113219" height="169" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/maryam-naghash-zargaran-300x169.png" width="300" /></a></p><p>Several months ago we reported how the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/04/15/iranian-muslim-leaves-islam-for-christ-the-muslims-jail-her-and-now-are-denying-her-medical-treatment/">Iranian government arrested Maryam Zargaran for abandoning Islam for Christ</a> and how they were denying her medical treatment. According to a new report she has just been released after four years in detention:</p><blockquote><p>An Iranian Christian convert has been released from Tehran's Evin prison after four years in detention.</p><p>Maryam Naghash Zargaran, 39, was arrested alongside Iranian-American pastor Saeed Abedini in January 2013 in connection with their work at an orphanage.</p><p>According to World Watch Monitor, she was released last night.</p><p>Zargaran was originally sentenced to four years imprisonment for acts that were 'in line with England and Occupied Palestine's [Israel's] anti-security agenda to spread Christianity in Iran in order to pervert Iranian society from Islam'.</p><p>She suffers from a number of medical conditions and had heart surgery 10 years ago. She has also been diagnosed with lumbar disc disease, arthritis and osteoporosis. Her congenital heart condition has reportedly been exacerbated by conditions in the prison.</p><p>Zargaran was denied treatment for her medical conditions in prison, being cited by Amnesty as an example of Iran's 'cruel' denial of medical care. She undertook several hunger strikes and was allowed to leave prison several times for medical treatment, but was forced to return each time before it was completed, World Watch Monitor says. Her sentence was extended by six weeks to reflect the time she spent outside prison.</p><p>Mansour Borji, from the advocacy group Article 18, told World Watch Monitor her 'unjust detention despite severe health issues is clear evidence of Iran's lack of respect for religious freedom'.</p><p>'Part of this suppression is reflected in the increased number of arrests, but also smear campaigns against religious minorities, especially Christians,' he added. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.christiantoday.com/article/iranian.christian.maryam.zargaran.is.released.from.prison/111407.htm">source</a>)</p></blockquote>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Iran Frees Former Muslim Turned Christian After Four Years In Prison

Several months ago we reported how the Iranian government arrested Maryam Zargaran for abandoning Islam for Christ and how they were d...

Read More...»

Major British Ethicist Warns: They Are Editing Human Embryos To Create A Super Race Of People Who Will Be The Elites And Who Will Oppress Everyone Else

<p>A major British ethicist has warned that the recent editing of DNA in human embryos in Oregon is part of a sinister plan to create an elite class of people perceived to be genetically superior, and who will become oppressors. As we read in <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rt.com/uk/398437-designer-baby-dna-elite/">one report</a>:</p><blockquote><div class="article__summary summary ">‘Superior’ designer babies born into the upper class with genetically modified physical appearances and intelligence could be just years away, a British geneticist has warned, after scientists announced they had used gene editing to repair a mutation in human embryos.</div></blockquote><div class="article__text text js-mediator-article"><blockquote><p>In a world first, US researchers announced on Wednesday in the science journal Nature they had used the controversial gene editing technique, CRISPR-Cas9, to correct a mutation for a heart condition in embryos.</p><p>The technique could eventually let doctors remove inherited conditions from embryos before they go on to become a child. That, in turn, opens up the possibility of diseases like cystic fibrosis and ovarian cancer being wiped out entirely, researchers say.</p></blockquote><div class="arcticle__read-more read-more"><blockquote><p>Although the scientists only edited out mutations that could cause diseases, it modified the nuclear DNA that sits right at the heart of the cell, which also influences personal characteristics such as intelligence, height, facial appearance and eye color.</p><p>While many are hailing the research as an exciting breakthrough, Dr David King of Human Genetics Alert in London told RT it could eventually lead to a <em>“eugenics scenario.”</em></p><p>King, who is a geneticist and molecular biologist, says only the upper echelons of society would be able to afford the expensive technology. Many will want to give their children<em> “genetic advantages over other people’s children”</em> and see it as an <em>“investment”</em> to give them<em> “the best start in life,”</em> he says.</p><p><em>“I think that in a world in which some people are regarded as genetically superior to others because they have been genetically enhanced is a radically more unequal and oppressive world than what we have now,”</em> King says.</p><p><em>“I don’t think it’s unrealistic that once you’ve had a few generations of an elite being genetically enhanced and the rest of us not being, then people in the elite will not have any real interest in having children with members of the rest of the population.”</em></p></blockquote><p>For the first known time in US history, scientists have now experimented on human embryos to edit their DNA. Nothing came out of the experiment, and the babies were simply dumped in the bin. This is something that the eugenists in America have been trying to do as they have envied the license in which scientists in China have been allowed to carry out this transhumanist evil. The experiment was done in Portland, Oregon, and it was led by an Uyghur Turk scientist from Kazakhstan named Shoukhrat Mitalipov of Oregon Health and Science University.</p><div id="attachment_113079" style="width: 697px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/maxresdefault-6.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-113079" height="386" sizes="(max-width: 687px) 100vw, 687px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/maxresdefault-6-1024x576.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/maxresdefault-6-1024x576.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/maxresdefault-6-300x169.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/maxresdefault-6-768x432.jpg 768w" width="687" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Shoukhrat Mitalipov</p></div><p>Mitalipov genetically edited the pre-born human babies by a system known as CRISPR (<em>Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats). </em>For years, experimentations on human embryos have been done in China, with eugenists in America looking with utter jealousy, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/04/11/incredible-research-exposed-secret-us-documents-reveal-how-the-united-states-government-is-designing-the-plan-that-is-moving-the-world-towards-armageddon/">exhorting</a> for the legalization of gene editing on human babies. Now, Mitalipov is being hailed as one who has broken the ice in the United States and demonstrated that the manipulation of human genetics in embryos can be done to make "healthy children," or as one <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.technologyreview.com/s/608350/first-human-embryos-edited-in-us/">report</a> puts it:</p><blockquote><p>Now Mitalipov is believed to have broken new ground both in the number of embryos experimented upon and by demonstrating that it is possible to safely and efficiently correct defective genes that cause inherited diseases.</p><p>Although none of the embryos were allowed to develop for more than a few days—and there was never any intention of implanting them into a womb—the experiments are a milestone on what may prove to be an inevitable journey toward the birth of the first genetically modified humans.</p></blockquote><p>So they say.</p><p>Mitalipov declined to reveal the results of the human experiment, but said that they will be in a pending research paper.</p><p>By editing the genetic makeup of a human embryo, these eugenists believe that they can create humans who will be born without disease. Its all part of the transhumanist utopian vision of a perfect world without aging or death. This transhumanist ideology is part of the Antichrist system; for in their hatred of Christ, Who defeated death on the Cross, they want to be the victors over death. By being antichrists, they are anti-human, saying with their father the devil, "I will exalt my throne above the stars of God" (Isaiah 14:13). And do not forget the words of the wise Solomon: "all they that hate me love death." (Proverbs 8:36)</p><p>The transhumanists believe that they can defeat aging by manipulating or eradicating certain genes that they believe are the causers of aging or disease. They want to be "natural selection," the god of Darwin, and 'select' the baby who should die and the baby who should be born. They want to 'select' the genes that are causing death in the perverted view that they can create a super human -- a <em>Übermensch</em> -- and this is purely a genocidal utopian vision. Because they will never create a human who will never die, their genetic experiments will never be successful, and the end result of their masterplan will be to exterminate all those who they deem genetically inferior, or those who they see as genetic obstacles to their darwinian envisage of perfectly evolved mortals.</p><p>Now they are just experimenting on pre-born humans, to "edit" their genetic makeup, and what will happen when they realize that they will never "edit" a human to be this perfectly healthy person? They will turn to other forms of anti-human despotism: from those who are small embryos, they will move their tyrannical hands to more developed humans, to children and to adults.</p><p>According to the same report, this recently done human experiment was called “'germline engineering'” because any genetically modified child would then pass the changes on to subsequent generations via their own germ cells—the egg and sperm." This right here gives us an idea on their sinister plans. They want to "edit" an embryo to have superior genes, so that it could "pass on" those genes in procreation. This is all about "selecting" those who lives and who dies; the ones with the good genes are to be allowed to live and perpetuate their genetic makeup, and the ones who are without these genes should not be allowed to be born, but are to only be exterminated. This is what they are really trying to say. As bioethicist Alta Charo said:</p><blockquote><p>“Genome editing to enhance traits or abilities beyond ordinary health raises concerns about whether the benefits can outweigh the risks, and about fairness if available only to some people"</p></blockquote><p>In their vile social-Darwinist thinking, if inferior genes are allowed to continue on, they hinder the process of evolving to perfection; thus, those who are born with genes that are 'holding back' humanity, need to be exterminated, while those with the genetic makeup that allows for a life without disease or aging, need to be the ones who procreate. This is all Nazism, repackaged.</p><p>The Nazis of the past were more honest, they said they wanted to create a master race, the overman or Übermensch of Nietzsche;<em> </em>they said they wanted to exterminate people. <span class="s1">In 1880, Frederich Nietzsche wrote:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p9"><span class="s1">“The tendency must be towards the rendering extinct of the wretched, the deformed, the degenerate.”</span></p></blockquote><p>Nietzsche was evil, but he was open about his evil. Now, today's readers of Nietzsche, while fantasizing about being a Übermensch, present themselves with clean cut millennial suits, smiles and modern faces; the Nazis of today come to us with talk of "human innovation," and of "bioengineering" -- when they really mean genocide.</p><p>The Uyghur Turk, Mitalipov is like the Young Turks of the 20th century Ottoman Empire who butchered millions of Christians not entirely in the name of Islam, but rather in the cause of eugenics, since the Young Turks wanted to create a 'homogenous' society purged of those they considered 'inferior' to the Turkish race. The Ottoman empire was a major force of the Antichrist, and in being within the Antichrist system, it accepted and implemented Darwinism when the evil ideology became very popular in Western nations.</p><p>Eugenics, as it was in the past, is being promoted by homosexuals, which is not surprising since St. John describes the Antichrist system as "Sodom and Egypt" (Revelation 11:8), a perfect description of the evils that we see violently intensifying, that is, the rise of homosexuality and paganism. One of the sodomites who is promoting eugenics is Milo Yiannopolous, a degenerate who has become an idol of the Rightwing as they bow down before the gods of Sodom and Gomorrah. In an article published by Breitbart, Milo <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/07/04/major-leader-of-the-catholic-church-declares-men-who-sodomize-each-other-can-take-holy-communion/">wrote</a> that “gay men are smarter: we test higher for IQ than our heterosexual counterparts. Intelligence allows us to 'transcend' our evolutionary programming, according to evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa, which may explain the correlation between homosexuality and high IQ.”</p><p>What is disturbing, is that even after Milo <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/02/19/milo-yiannopoulos-supports-pedophilia-and-declares-to-all-americans-that-they-must-support-elderly-homosexual-men-sodomizing-thirteen-year-old-boys/">explicitly pushed</a> for the normalization and acceptance of pedophilia, the Rightwing -- who incessantly go on and on like a broken record about how Muhammad had sex with a nine-year old girl -- still trip on each other's toes to revere this vile heretic. Just a few days ago, the Horowitz Freedom Center, one of the major operations of the American Rightwing, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/267317/milo-david-horowitz-freedom-center-frontpagemagcom">had</a> Milo on to speak, and the crowd -- filled with people who no doubt see themselves as morally upright -- of course revered him as he boasted about being a "dangerous Faggot".  David Horowitz introduced this sodomite nazi with the typical sycophancy so commonly expressed towards degenerates, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.truthrevolt.org/commentary/david-horowitz-introduces-milo-freedom-center-book-launch">saying</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Milo Yiannopoulos is a warrior the likes of whom no Republican Party or conservative movement has ever seen. As a gay man, and a flamboyant one, he is in his own person a weapon against the left’s preposterous claim to speak on behalf of the so-called marginalized and oppressed. Not that being gay has protected Milo from vicious personal attacks, intended to destroy him. Being gay threw his enemies off balance so he could deliver many <em>coups de gras</em>. But rank hypocrisy or belief in their own b.s. has never proved an obstacle to leftwing malevolence. Few individuals have ever been subjected to the kind of personal abuse that Milo has had to suffer in his service to the cause. But Milo - for all his fey limp-wristedness - is an incredibly strong and brave man. There are few political figures who have displayed the kind of courage that Milo has regularly shown on the field of battle.</p></blockquote><p>Milo -- a sodomite who said that "I think in the gay World some of the most important enriching and incredibly the… mm … you know life affirming, important shaping relationships very often between younger boys and older men, they can be hugely positive experiences" -- is to a Rightwinger like David Horowitz,  "a warrior the likes of whom no Republican Party or conservative movement has ever seen." This is how sickening the Rightwing is. They are like the Pharisees, for they while promoting nationalism conspire with the very forces they claim to be against, to make war upon Christ Himself.</p><p>Now, why would a person like David Horowitz, someone who has spent years fighting against what he calls "cultural marxism," work with a eugenist nazi sodomite? Its because he is a part of this evil system himself. David Horowitz, and those like him, are acolytes of the Antichrist, the religion of which consists of heresy, paganism, homosexuality, eugenics and transhumanism.</p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">David Horowitz, the founder of FrontPage Magazine and the Horowitz Freedom Center, has a son named Ben Horowitz, a major American industrialist and blogger, who resides in Silicon Valley. Ben Horowitz founded the venture capital firm, <em>Andreessen Horowitz</em>, co-founded by fellow Silicon Valley investor, Marc Andreessen.</span></p><div id="attachment_113080" style="width: 410px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ben2_400x400.jpeg"><img alt="" class="size-full wp-image-113080" height="400" sizes="(max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ben2_400x400.jpeg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ben2_400x400.jpeg 400w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ben2_400x400-150x150.jpeg 150w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ben2_400x400-300x300.jpeg 300w" width="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Ben Horowitz</p></div><p> </p><div id="attachment_113081" style="width: 547px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/marc-andreessen.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-113081" height="403" sizes="(max-width: 537px) 100vw, 537px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/marc-andreessen.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/marc-andreessen.jpg 480w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/marc-andreessen-300x225.jpg 300w" width="537" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Marc Andreessen</p></div><p class="p1"><span class="s2"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://medium.com/@producthunt/ben-horowitz-s-best-startup-advice-7e8c09c8de1b">In an interview</a></span><span class="s1">, Ben Horowitz was asked: “If you had to start your career all over again, where would you start today?” to which Ben responded by saying: “I think that I would be a bio hacker. Computational biology is the most exciting thing that I’ve ever seen. I’d love to work in that field.” Bio hacking is essentially the manipulation of genetics to make someone “better,” hence this is where the transhumanist ideology comes in: the altering of the human genome to “defeat aging.” </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">The official website for the Andreessen Horowitz investment firm promotes a very bizarre thing fancily called “parabiosis” or, simply put, the idea of injecting the blood of youths into old people to keep them alive. This is vampirism. It is an idea of the eugenist transhumanist agenda, which claims to be “fighting aging.” <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://a16z.com/2017/04/17/life-extension-geroscience-aging/"><span class="s2">On the website it says</span></a>: “Far from science fiction, recent discoveries have given us a whole crop of promising breakthroughs to treat aging, such as parabiosis (young blood infused into old blood)”. Ultimately, this is all about farming humans, to harvest their blood for the elite oligarchs, as the Aztecs farmed humans to spill their blood for their diabolical rituals. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s2"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://a16z.com/2017/02/23/yuval-harari-from-homo-sapiens-to-homo-deus/">On February of 2017, Ben Horowitz’s firm interviewed</a></span><span class="s1"> Yuval Harari who -- like Milo -- is an Israeli eugenist and homosexual who is a major advocate for transhumanism. Harari wants to create his own transhumanist utopia in which human beings are replaced by machines, and their brains are unified with computers; also, in this very sick utopia, Harari envisions a socialist society in which the new religion of the world will declare that “we” are gods. Harari makes this diabolical envisaging clear on Ben Horowitz’s website. During the interview, Sonal Chokshi, who works for Horowitz Andreessen, asks Harari: “What do humans have to believe to make this reality continue happening? Will they not have any agency in any of this? Because it sounds like we’re almost talking about these uploaded brains in a vat. And is there any sense of coordination, consciously? Is there a new religion? … What do people have to believe in this new world? What is there religion?” To this, Harari says:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“I think we are seeing and we will see more and more the rise of techno religions, religions based on technology that make all the old promises of traditional religions; they promise justice and happiness, and even immortality and paradise. But here on earth, with the help of technology, there already has been one very important techno-religion in history, which is socialism, which came in the 19th century with the industrial revolution. And what Marx and Lennon basically said: we will create paradise on earth with the help of technology, steam engines, electricity and so forth. When Lennon was once asked to define communism in a single sentence, the answer he gave was: Communism is power to the workers’ councils, plus electrification of the whole country. You cannot establish a communist regime without industrialization. Its based on the technology of the industrial revolution, electricity and steam engines and so forth. And the idea is that we will use this technology to create paradise on earth. It didn’t really work that well. So now I think we will see the second wave of techno-religions. Now we have genetics, and now we have big data, and above all we have algorithms. Our salvation — paradise will come from the algorithms.” </span></p></blockquote><div id="attachment_113082" style="width: 691px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Yuval-Noah-Harari.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-113082" height="383" sizes="(max-width: 681px) 100vw, 681px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Yuval-Noah-Harari.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Yuval-Noah-Harari.jpg 851w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Yuval-Noah-Harari-300x169.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Yuval-Noah-Harari-768x431.jpg 768w" width="681" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Yuval Harari</p></div><p class="p1"><span class="s1">After this, Kyle Russell, another person who works for Horowitz Andreessen, said that we would have to "sacrifice our own humanity" to machines and by this, become gods:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“We’re hitting some kind of productivity cap as normal humans that autonomous machines and systems are going to beat us, so we have to sacrifice our own humanity to increase our own productivity, and augment ourselves. You can almost see the emergence of some kind of powerful ideology, like, the religion of the 21st century onward is, <strong>we are the gods</strong>?” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">To this, Harari said:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“This is actually an old idea. Humanism, which goes back to the 18th century, even 17th century, is saying humans are the gods, humans are the source of all meaning and authority. Everything you expected previously from the gods, to give legitimacy to political systems, to make decisions in ethics, humanism comes in and says the highest source of authority in politics is the voter, the highest source of authority in economics is the customer, the highest source of authority in ethics is your own feelings, humans are the gods. Now we are entering a post-humanist era, authority is shifting away from humans. If, in the last 300 years we authority descending from the clouds to earth, to humans, now authority is shifting back to the clouds, but not to God, but to the Google cloud, to the Microsoft cloud. The basic idea of this, if you want, new religion or new ideology, is again, that given enough data, and enough computing power, and algorithms, can understand me better than I can understand myself, and make decisions for me, in the end religion is about authority.”<span class="Apple-converted-space">           </span></span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">They want to manufacture a utopia — a dark society — in which there is a hierarchy, where elites rule over everyone else, using human beings as slaves to their techno-cult. This idea that "humans are the source of all meaning and authority" is an utterly genocidal idea; for if humans are the moral authority, then Stalin and Hitler are the moral authorities, since they were indeed humans. </span></p><div id="attachment_113083" style="width: 469px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/kyle_russell2.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-113083" height="459" sizes="(max-width: 459px) 100vw, 459px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/kyle_russell2.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/kyle_russell2.jpg 400w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/kyle_russell2-150x150.jpg 150w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/kyle_russell2-300x300.jpg 300w" width="459" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Kyle Russel</p></div><p class="p2"><span class="s1">Kyle Russel, who works for Ben Horowitz and who interviewed the Israeli eugenist, Yuval Harari, is also a eugenist himself. Silicon Valley is filled with these types of people — I call them, hipster nazis. These are basically far leftists who are the most radical about the Theory of Evolution. They are, essentially, people who have actually read Darwin. They want to see and implement the purest imposition of Darwin’s ideology of Natural Selection. The same can be said for the far-rightest who believes in “race realism” and use Darwinism to justify their genocidal ideology. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Kyle Russel is a supporter of the company, <em>Counsyl</em>, stationed in San Francisco. Counsyl is a company that pregnant women go to to have their wombs screened, to see if their child will have any diseases or deformities. Counsyl prides itself in the computer technology it utilizes to conduct this procedure, and if their computers say that a child tests positive for physical complications, the Silicon Valley funded company will notify the parents. But here is where eugenics comes in: Counsyl actually will do in vitro fertilization (IVF), in that they will fertilize several eggs, take the embryo that is the most preferred, and destroy the rest. This destruction is pure eugenics; it is the demonic pursuit of preventing certain ‘undesirable genes’ from being passed on through the extermination of certain people. In the words of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.counsyl.com/services/foresight/">official website of Counsyl: </a></span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), done with IVF, can greatly reduce the chances of passing on irregular genes to your baby. Fertility specialists look at the genes of several of your embryos and place the healthiest in your womb.”</span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">What Counsyl is doing in this case has been guised under the sophistical title of “selective pregnancy reduction,” or the selection of one embryo over the others for its desirable genetic makeup. <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vcnewsdaily.com/counsyl/venture-capital-funding/qpdgmmqnwx"><span class="s2">Counsyl is financed</span></a> by Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners and Goldman Sachs Asset Management, which is telling because Goldman Sachs also finances Planned Parenthood, which is not so surprising since both are eugenist establishments. In fact, in May of this year, Marc Andreessen, Ben Horowitz's partner, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.recode.net/2017/3/16/14933924/marc-andreessen-reed-hastings-cecile-richards-netflix-planned-parenthood-code">shared a platform</a> with the president of Planned Parenthood, Cecile Richards.  </span></p><div id="attachment_113085" style="width: 589px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/horowitz-andreessen-copy.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-113085" height="422" sizes="(max-width: 579px) 100vw, 579px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/horowitz-andreessen-copy-1024x746.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/horowitz-andreessen-copy-1024x746.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/horowitz-andreessen-copy-300x219.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/horowitz-andreessen-copy-768x559.jpg 768w" width="579" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Snapshot of an advertisement for the event for Marc Andreessen (left) and Cecile Richards (right)</p></div><p>This is the same Cecile Richards who makes profits out of the harvesting and selling of the organs of human babies aborted by Planned Parenthood. If these genocidal people are harvesting children like animals, they will do the same evils to any other human being, regardless of size or age.</p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">When the Second World War ended, eugenics became a taboo subject. But, people like those in Silicon Valley, now must do their evil schemes under a different cover: under the guise of ‘technological innovation,’ pseudo-medical jargon that speaks of plugging in human brains to computer systems; the eugenics of today is done under the guise of “fighting aging” or making a “cure for aging.” Its all a chimera, a delusion to perdition. We awe ourselves into the realm of bloodlust, with the destruction of the innocent being done under the gazes of evil men of prestige. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Jared Taylor, one of the pioneers of the so-called “Alt Right” also promotes this evil and calls it “embryo selection.” Jared Taylor said in <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVmTkMWa-EI"><span class="s2">one interview</span></a>:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“I believe that an enlightened European people will begin to think in terms of improving itself genetically. I think there are positive eugenic steps that could be taken, embryo selection is one”<span class="Apple-converted-space">     </span></span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Embryo selection”  is the choosing of which unborn child is more deserving to live than the others, for no other reason than its genetic makeup. Moreover, the procedure of screening pregnant women to see if a child has Down’s Syndrome, is an action done to incentivize infanticide. On the official website for Counsyl, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.counsyl.com/services/informed-pregnancy-screen/?utm_term=counsyl&utm_campaign=construction&utm_medium=cpc&utm_source=google&gclid=CLzApMHMmtQCFQyLaQodT3EGEQ"><span class="s2">it reads</span></a>: “As early as week 10, find out if your baby has an increased chance for chromosome conditions like Down syndrome.” On the same website, it talks about the passing down of genes that give a child's eye and hair color, and also the genes that give diseases:</span></p><blockquote><p>The genes babies inherit from their parents pass along family characteristics like hair and eye color. Sometimes they also pass on genetic diseases, even if the parents don’t have any symptoms. If two people are carriers for the same condition, there’s a one in four chance their children could develop symptoms.</p></blockquote><p>There is an underlying message in all this talk. Notice that it first makes mention of the genes that give "hair and eye color" before it speaks of diseases. The use of fear of disease is the initial strategy to accept eugenics as some sort of a life saver, or as a solution against disease. But, at the end of the day it is about creating their ideal human, their ideal society, in which only certain people will be allowed the right of birth and of life, based on their specific genetic makeup.</p><div id="attachment_113087" style="width: 343px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/2e3c85b22e54b1404f6c0e97fac2cd2d-aryan-race-sabotage.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-113087" height="479" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/2e3c85b22e54b1404f6c0e97fac2cd2d-aryan-race-sabotage.jpg" width="333" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nazi propaganda, showing the "ideal" human</p></div><p>The CEO of Counsyl is Ramji Srinivasan. On his Twitter account he supports the “Biotech” work of major Silicon Valley eugenist, Peter Thiel. Srinivasan shared a post done by his own company, Counsyl, supporting Thiel:</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/cj-thiel-counsyl-copy.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter wp-image-113086" height="450" sizes="(max-width: 616px) 100vw, 616px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/cj-thiel-counsyl-copy-1024x749.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/cj-thiel-counsyl-copy-1024x749.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/cj-thiel-counsyl-copy-300x219.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/cj-thiel-counsyl-copy-768x562.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/cj-thiel-counsyl-copy.jpg 1438w" width="616" /></a></p><p class="p1"><span class="s2"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.technologyreview.com/s/535771/a-contrarian-in-biotech/">The article </a></span><span class="s1">posted was written by another tech-eugenist, Antonio Regalado, and advocates for the work of Austen Heinz, whose “Cambrian Genomics” is a company funded by Thiel and is all about genetic engineering in pursuit for the objective of creating babies designed by computers:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“These days, you can order DNA online, crowdfund a genetic engineering project, or outsource experiments. Austen Heinz, CEO of Cambrian Genomics, a company that sells built-to-order DNA strands, says you can imagine what will happen if biotech becomes as easy as software to try and to test. An ‘explosion of biotech companies is coming,’ he says.” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Heinz’s company, Cambrian Genomics, wants to create ‘designer babies,’ the procedure of which involves parents picking which genetic traits they desire in their child.<span class="Apple-converted-space">  </span>“Every human being will be designed on a computer, and that’s something we’re starting right now with Happy Healthy Baby,” says Mr. Heinz, founder and CEO of Cambrian Genomics.</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1"> Eggs are fertilized in vitro, and the unborn children that are then conceived are under the mercy of the parents’ genetic preference. One child is chosen, and the rest destroyed. This is what the elite nazis at Silicon Valley want, a world where human life is exterminated simply over the whims of a hypergamous perception of what are desirable genetic traits. If the nazis of the past said, “Gott mit uns” (God with us), then the nazis of the future will declare “Gott ist uns” (God is us). The Nazis of old decried that humanity was not taking control of “natural selection,” and wanted to be the selectors of who lives and who dies. Now, parents can do the same exact thing, but this time in a nice clean building in their clean cut, White liberal environment in the Bay Area. This “selection” was referred to by Austen Heinz when he said in an <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://ipscell.com/2015/01/cambrian/"><span class="s2">interview</span></a>: </span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Already people are designing babies digitally via selection whether through pre-implant genetic diagnosis or through mitochondrial embryo transplant i.e. 3 parent babies.”</span></p></blockquote><div id="attachment_113088" style="width: 635px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/austenheinz-SciencepreneurExtraordinairePioneersFestival2014_60618.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-113088" height="290" sizes="(max-width: 625px) 100vw, 625px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/austenheinz-SciencepreneurExtraordinairePioneersFestival2014_60618-1024x475.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/austenheinz-SciencepreneurExtraordinairePioneersFestival2014_60618-1024x475.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/austenheinz-SciencepreneurExtraordinairePioneersFestival2014_60618-300x139.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/austenheinz-SciencepreneurExtraordinairePioneersFestival2014_60618-768x356.jpg 768w" width="625" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Austen Heinz</p></div><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Heinz himself must not have been the superhuman he wanted to be, since he eventually committed suicide. Bioethicist professor at Standford, Hank Greely, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/06/16/482189322/will-baby-making-move-from-the-bedroom-to-the-lab"><span class="s2">predicts</span></a> that soon wealthy people will not have sex to procreate, but for simply pleasure, and will have babies through “embryo selection,” in which the “doctor” will present one hundred embryos and people will choose which one they want, based on genetic traits, while the other ninety-nine will be exterminated:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Yes, I think we will see an increased and broad use of embryo selection. I would be careful to set the time frame at 20-40 years. I think we'll actually see a world where most babies born to people with good health coverage will be conceived in the lab. People will make about a hundred embryos, each will have its whole genome tested, and the parents will be [asked ... "Tell] us what you want to know and then tell us what embryo you want."</span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1"> Heinz says he thinks "in general most people want children that are healthier than they were — maybe better. I think as a race, or as a species we have a goal of improving who we are.” These people want to do “gene hacking,” manipulating human DNA to create a “better” human. The whole thing sounds like it would tickle the ears of Mengele himself. Certain DNA is “superior,” and this<span class="Apple-converted-space">  </span>“superior” DNA should dominate over the rest. This is eugenics, pure and simple. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Hollywood enjoys portraying demonic possession with people flying in the air and different voices coming out of their mouths, and while these things do happen, they are a rarity. The reality is that people under the influence or possession of the diabolical, do actions that lead to the destruction of human life.</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>FRONTPAGE MAGAZINE AND SILICON VALLEY</strong> </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Now, I know there will be people who will say that Ben Horowitz is not his father, David Horowitz, and that their views should not be associated together. But, this argument does not stand against the reality that on Front Page Magazine itself, there are articles written by the Norwegian eugenist, Peder Are Nøstvold Jensen, commonly known by his pseudonym, Fjordman. </span></p><div id="attachment_113101" style="width: 676px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Peder_Nøstvold_Jensen-fjordman003.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-113101" height="375" sizes="(max-width: 666px) 100vw, 666px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Peder_Nøstvold_Jensen-fjordman003-1024x576.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Peder_Nøstvold_Jensen-fjordman003-1024x576.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Peder_Nøstvold_Jensen-fjordman003-300x169.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Peder_Nøstvold_Jensen-fjordman003-768x432.jpg 768w" width="666" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Fjordman</p></div><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Apparently, David Horowitz has no problem with allowing him to write eugenist arguments on his website. For example, in 2012, Horowitz’s magazine published an article by Fjordman entitled, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/135806/price-european-immigration-fjordman"><span class="s2">“The Price of European Migration,” </span></a>in which he said:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“A few skilled immigrants from India or elsewhere can compete, but mainly those from East Asia: Japanese, Koreans, Chinese, and to some extent Vietnamese. All other non-Western immigrants show lower levels of skill and competence than Europeans, many of them a lot lower. It should be mentioned here that these numbers correlate quite well with average IQ, where a few other Asians can compete with Europeans, but primarily East Asians. Other ethnic groups cannot do so. Although it has become taboo to say this in the modern Western world, it is well-documented fact that IQ correlates well with economic level, for individuals as well as for nations. The scholar Charles Murray has written much about this.”</span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Now, before you go off on the typical argument that “Maybe Horowitz doesn’t know!” or “Maybe the people who run FrontPage can’t keep track of everything posted on their site,” I will have you know that the people who run this website are very stringent and review each article before they are published. I know this from my own experience. I dealt with Jamie Glazov, the managing editor at Front Page numerous times, and he, while publishing a good amount of my previous articles, refused to publish a few of my writings because they had Christian messages. There was one article that Glazov refused to publish because it described Islam as being satanic. In one email to me he wrote:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Hi Theodore, sorry we gotta pass on this one. But keep them coming. Also please keep in mind Theodore, that Frontpage doesn't get into Islam being "Satanic"....we are a political journal.” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">In another email, Glazov said to me that “we do not enter the religious terrain....like obviously we support the Judeo-Christian tradition, but we do not talk about Satan and/or how the 2nd Amendment is a right given by God”. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">In FrontPage Magazine, you can’t talk about God or the reality of the diabolical, but you can sure promote eugenist and social-Darwinist beliefs. <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/192534/muslim-riots-and-leftist-willful-blindness-fjordman"><span class="s2">In another article written by Fjordman</span></a>, and published by Front Page, it says:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Of course, if you look into the taboo subject of genetic intelligence measured in mean IQ, saying that Pakistanis or Turks have “smarter” brains than northern Europeans is utter nonsense.” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s2"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/188140/uniqueness-western-civilization-fjordman">In yet another article written by Fjordman</a></span><span class="s1"> and published by Front Page, the Norwegian eugenist references the American self-proclaimed “white separatist,” Michael H. Hart, in writing on his beliefs in inherited IQ in Europeans. In one part he says, “Michael H. Hart in his book Understanding Human History views the flow of human history primarily through the prism of IQ differences among various ethnic groups. This does indeed explain many things, although it has become politically sensitive to say as much in the Western world today, but it does not explain everything. No single factor ever does.” </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">He then goes on to say that the “European restless spirit, individual curiosity and innate desire to seek out new horizons … eventually led humanity from donkeys to space travel. If any civilization or groups of people on this planet were destined to leave Earth behind and begin exploring the vastness of space, it was the Europeans. Evidence indicates that no non-European nation or culture, not even the most sophisticated of these, ever came close to making a similar breakthrough on their own.” </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">David Horowitz, Jamie Glazgov and the rest of the Right-wing gang in Front Page Magazine have no issue with this type of writing, but they have so much animosity towards articles that express the Christian Faith and explain the realities of the demonic. Robert Spencer and the rest of these Right-wing loons, will wail and holler at someone who believes in laws punishing sodomites, but they have no issue publishing the works of this eugenist, Fjordman, who writes openly on his belief in the superiority of the German and Northern European races. He <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2010/01/iq-and-human-accomplishment-debate.html"><span class="s2">writes</span></a>:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Regarding the Germans, this is an intriguing question. I am quite convinced that IQ is an important variable and I have seen several rankings listing the Germans as having the highest average IQ in Europe. Nevertheless, IQ does not explain everything. No single factor ever does. For instance, it does not explain why Europeans and people of European origins outperformed East Asians by such a wide margin, despite the fact that the latter match us in average IQ. It is interesting that very roughly speaking, IQ increases the further north you get. This means that Europe as a whole has higher IQ than the Middle East, and much higher than tropical Africa. However, there are also minor differences within Europe, and not necessarily statistically insignificant ones. Europeans north of the Alps have slightly higher IQs than those in southern Europe. It is possible to argue that the Swedes and Dutch have outperformed some of the Balkan peoples because of this. The Italians are often listed as having the highest mean IQ in southern Europe, which is consistent with the fact that Italians make up the southern European nation that ranks the highest in modern human accomplishment. The greatest riddle are the Greeks, who in ancient times could produce great geniuses such as Aristotle, Archimedes and Hipparchus, but today have one of the lowest IQs on the European continent.”</span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">In 1997, David Horowitz wrote an <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=24393">article</a> for his publication, FrontPage Magazine, praising the Silicon Valley millionaire, Ron Unz, because he funded a ballot initiative for a program called “English for Children" that would teach the children of Mexican immigrants the English language. Horowitz wrote:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Ron Unz, a right-wing Republican candidate in the last gubernatorial election and Silicon Valley millionaire, has put his money behind a ballot measure called the English Language Education for Immigrant Children Initiative (or the shortened English for Children). Imagine! In 1997, in America, it takes a ballot initiative to give Spanish-speaking immigrants the right to have their children educated in the language of the country in which they have chosen to live, and thus enhance their opportunity to succeed. … Now Tuchman has joined Unz in a coalition that includes Latinos, conservatives and even some leftists in support of the English for Children initiative.” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Once you make an evil as part of a discussion, you normalize it, you have set it off and don’t even need to openly defend it. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">While the idea of a program to teach Hispanic children English seems harmless and beneficial, there is a sinister agenda behind the work of Ron Unz. This Silicon Valley elite is a major eugenist. In the work of Unz, it is so filled with sophistical code talk, one must read between the lines to see that he is promoting eugenics. What Unz, and the rest of these modern eugenists do, is present eugenist arguments, express some doubt about them, and then affirm that the Darwinist arguments present good evidence that we can learn from. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">They will refer to the advocation of eugenics as merely being a part of a “discussion” as opposed to either explicitly calling it evil, or affirming that it is good. By making something as heinous as eugenics as being simply a part of a “debate” or “conversation,” these sophists directly normalize eugenics. For decades, homosexual activists made their depravities as simply part of debate; abortionists made infanticide simply part of a debate. Today you have people, like Milo Yiannopoulos, who want to make pedophilia into a part of a discussion. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Eugenists, wanting to remove the stigma against their movement that was made after the end of the Second World War, have been making open Social Darwinism as part of a simple discourse. Once evil is not explicitly condemned, and becomes a part of common discourse, it is normalized, and then soon, tolerated, and ultimately, imposed.“But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.” (Matthew 5:37) Speaking nonchalantly about evil, is a means to making it common and acceptable. It is as if someone asks you, “Would you murder someone for a million dollars,” and you respond with: “I’ll have to think about that.” Right when a question on whether or not to do evil isn’t replied to with an emphatic answer of repulsion, then we have entered the realm of evil being tolerated. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s2"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/race-iq-and-wealth/">In one of Unz’s articles</a></span><span class="s1">, he introduces the work of eugenists Richard Lyne and Tatu Vanhanen (both of whose work is promoted by Robert Spencer’s partner, Sigurfrey Jonasson <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/06/10/major-evidence-reveals-that-robert-spencer-is-working-with-genocidal-satanist-nazi-cult-that-plans-to-eradicate-all-christians-in-concentration-camps/">on whom we have written extensively</a>), that some races are inherently superior in intelligence than others:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Although ‘intelligence’ may be difficult to define precisely, most people have accepted that IQ scores seem to constitute a rough and measurable proxy for this trait, so Lynn and Vanhanen have collected a vast number of national IQ scores from the last 50 or 60 years and compared these to income levels and economic growth rates. Since experts have discovered that nominal IQ scores over the last century or so have tended to rise at a seemingly constant rate—the so-called “Flynn Effect”—the authors adjusted their raw scores accordingly. Having done so, they found a strong correlation of around 0.50–0.75 between the Flynn-adjusted IQ of a nation’s population and its real per capita GDP over the last few decades, seemingly indicating that smarter peoples tend to be wealthier and more successful. From this statistical fact, Lynn and Vanhanen draw the conclusion that intelligence leads to economic success and—since they argue that intelligence itself is largely innate and genetic—that the relative development ranking of the long list of nations they analyze is unlikely to change much over time, nor will the economic standing of the various groups within ethnically mixed countries, including the United States.”</span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Now, while he references two eugenists — one of which, Richard Lynn, supports and advocates for a Social Darwinist autocratic despotism — he will then express that there may be some reason to doubt what they say.</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">By expressing doubt, Unz makes it difficult to pin point his beliefs. It is a strategy that is done to prevent people from outright exposing him. When someone does expose him, he can simply say, ‘I pointed out in the article that there are doubts in these theories, so I am not what you think I am.’ It is a strategy of deception, of sophism covering up academic ways for promoting genocide. In another part of the article, Unz writes: </span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Not unreasonably, many psychometric experts have argued that these results prove that IQ is largely determined by genetic factors and cannot be changed via environmental influences within any normal range. Lynn and Vanhanen cite several of these studies to argue that IQ is at least 80 percent hereditary.” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Regardless of all of his expressions of doubt, when this deviant describes eugenist beliefs as being “not unreasonably” believed, it indicates that he himself is a Social Darwinist. The evil scheme behind conveying these most destructive beliefs, is to communicate them within the vehicle of “objectivism” and a sprinkling of doubt here and there in order to appear “reasonable.” And at the same time, he describes these evil beliefs as not "unreasonable."</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">In the same article, Unz attacks Charles Kenny for his writing against eugenists Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen, and also for his referencing of the work of scientist Stephan Jay Gould, that the skulls of blacks and whites are the same: </span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Although Kenny suggested that many of his targets had been circumspect in how they raised these highly controversial ideas, he singled out IQ and the Wealth of Nations, published in 2001 by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen, as a particularly extreme and hateful example of this trend. These authors explicitly argue that IQ scores for different populations are largely fixed and hereditary, and that these—rather than economic or governmental structures—tend to determine the long-term wealth of a given country.</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Kenny claimed that such IQ theories were not merely racist and deeply offensive but had also long been debunked by scientific experts—notably the prominent biologist Stephen Jay Gould in his 1980 book The Mismeasure of Man.</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">As Kenny soon discovered from the responses to his online article, he had seriously erred in quoting the authority of Gould, whose fraud on race and brain-size issues, presumably in service to his self-proclaimed Marxist beliefs, last year received further coverage in the New York Times. Science largely runs on the honor system, and once simple statements of fact—in Gould’s case, the physical volume of human skulls—are found to be false, we cannot trust more complex claims made by the particular scholar.”</span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">At the end of the article he praises Lynn and Vanhanen — both eugenists and racists — and scolded Gould for his simple belief that races are equal: </span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“I would be the first to acknowledge my gratitude to the scholars whose efforts made my own analysis possible. Meanwhile, individuals such as Stephen Jay Gould, who commit outright academic fraud in support of their ideological positions, do enormous damage to the credibility of their own camp.” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">His “gratitude” for two eugenists and his accusation of fraud towards Gould, show the true intentions of Ron Unz and those like him: he does not want to appear as an open eugenist, but his sly and elusive way of writing signifies his Social Darwinist sentiments. We need to awaken our own awareness of how this style of deception functions. Instead of focusing so much on the overly honest devils, we must work on combating the more deceptive works of the more dangerous cunning devils.</span></p><div id="attachment_113089" style="width: 409px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/related_ron-unz_gd_160531.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-113089" height="399" sizes="(max-width: 399px) 100vw, 399px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/related_ron-unz_gd_160531.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/related_ron-unz_gd_160531.jpg 600w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/related_ron-unz_gd_160531-150x150.jpg 150w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/related_ron-unz_gd_160531-300x300.jpg 300w" width="399" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Ron Unz</p></div><p class="p1"><span class="s1">In another article, Ron Unz argues that the reason why China has become economically so successful is because millions of Chinese died due to poverty and genocide done by the Japanese and Communists. The title of the article is, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.unz.com/runz/how-social-darwinism-made-modern-china-248/"><span class="s2">“How Social Darwinism Made Modern China”</span></a> and it argues that through “Malthusian” starvation, China became a better country. In other words, through genocide, the “unfit” die off and the ones who survive are left to pass on their superior genes. Unz does not explicitly say this, but when you start using terms such as “Social Darwinism” — which is the belief that the process of evolution will continue by killing off the “unfit” so that the “good” genes will perpetuate without taint — and “Malthusian” — which is the ideology of Thomas Malthus who believed that in order to prevent the poor for consuming resources, they need to be killed off — it is obvious that a eugenic message is being implied. He writes in his article:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“The widespread devastation produced by the Japanese invasion, World War II, and the Chinese Civil War, followed by the economic calamity of Maoism, did delay the predicted rise of China by a generation or two, but except for such unforeseen events, their analysis of Chinese potential seems remarkably prescient.”</span></p></blockquote><div id="attachment_113090" style="width: 810px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Nanking_bodies_1937.jpg"><img alt="" class="size-full wp-image-113090" height="559" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Nanking_bodies_1937.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Nanking_bodies_1937.jpg 800w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Nanking_bodies_1937-300x210.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Nanking_bodies_1937-768x537.jpg 768w" width="800" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Chinese victims of Japanese genocide. To Unz, these are the 'unfit' people who needed to die so that the survival of the fittest could be carried out</p></div><p class="p1"><span class="s1"> In other words, genocide was beneficial to the Chinese because, through the Darwinian chaos of “survival of the fittest,” the fittest survived, the “unfit” were butchered, and better genes were perpetuated without any competition from people of “lower” genetic makeup. He continues on to write:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“On the less fortunate side, the enormous population growth of recent centuries had gradually caught up with and overtaken China’s exceptionally efficient agricultural system, reducing the lives of most Chinese to the brink of Malthusian starvation; and these pressures and constraints were believed to be reflected in the Chinese people.” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Observe the words that he uses. “Malthusian starvation”, the use of such a term indicates what he is saying: genocide is good because it kills off the weak, while enabling the fittest to procreate their genes and make future generations superior to those who were wiped out. In another part of the article, Unz again advocates for Malthusian ideology. Referencing the economist Gregory Clark, Unz argues that what brought about the industrial revolution in England was that wealthier people were able to have more children, whereas the poor, being not as economically successful, had a higher infant mortality rate, or poorer health, and so died off more, leaving those of better “traits” to become the majority. The domination of better genetic traits, and the destruction of inferior traits, led to a better England, according to Unz and his reference, Gregory Clark. He writes: </span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Clark discovered evidence that for centuries the wealthier British had left significantly more surviving children than their poorer compatriots, thus leading their descendents to constitute an ever larger share of each generation. Presumably, this was because they could afford to marry at a younger age, and their superior nutritional and living arrangements reduced mortality rates for themselves and their families. Indeed, the near-Malthusian poverty of much ordinary English life during this era meant that the impoverished lower classes often failed even to reproduce themselves over time, gradually being replaced by the downwardly mobile children of their financial betters. Since personal economic achievement was probably in part due to traits such as diligence, prudence, and productivity, Clark argued that these characteristics steadily became more widespread in the British population, laying the human basis for later national economic success.”</span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Unz then goes on to describe Clark’s theory as “a perfectly plausible one.” You can look at all of the way that Unz tries to present himself as balanced, the theme of his article leads to one conclusion: genocide is good. He does not openly say, “we need genocide,” but by attributing China’s success, either to a great or small extent — to the genocides that it has experienced, can only indicate a favor towards genocide and the extermination of peoples as a means to bettering a nation.<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.unz.com/jman/solutions-again/"><span class="s2"> In 2012, Ron Unz published an article</span></a> on his website that advocated for using infanticide, through Planned Parenthood, to exterminate the children of “low IQ” people in the US:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Curbing reproduction of the low IQ individuals—of all races—would be the next important measure after immigration reform. Any sort of forced or coercive forms should be completely off the table. However, as mentioned before, an outright eugenics program, even if based on voluntary sterilization with incentives, is highly unlikely to fly. There are some workarounds, however: Planned Parenthood (which was founded by a eugenicist): It exists as a type of under-the-radar eugenics program. Planned Parenthood centers could be built and heavily marketed in low-income areas, with heavy availability and marketing of long-term contraceptive measures, such as Norplant. Long-term, fool-proof measures are preferred, because low-IQ women can’t necessarily be depended upon to take birth control pills or use condoms regularly.”<span class="Apple-converted-space">   </span></span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Following the ideology of Silicon Valley elites like Peter Thiel and Ben Horowitz, the article then goes on to promote “Genetic engineering” and says that “Much talk is made about the possibility of parents tailoring their children to suit their own desires, most easily through embryo selection.” He then describes embryo selection and genetic engineering as “valid, concrete solutions to the demographic problems we face.” </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Another article was published on Ron Unz’s website, written by Charles Wood and entitled: <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.unz.com/article/new-prospects-for-eugenics/?highlight=eugenics"><span class="s2">“New Prospects for Eugenics.”</span></a> It is filled with the sick fantasies of Social Darwinists, of banks that that the elites can go to where they can get frozen embryos to have implanted in a womb:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“The next logical step would be to establish a bank of demi-embryos, that is, frozen embryos that were identical twins of highly capable people who had already been born–some may be adults or even deceased. A childless couple could conceivably meet and directly evaluate the person whose identical twin they were considering for implantation. Most people have a strong desire to be the parents of their own genetic offspring. Choosing to implant a demi-embryo might be more attractive if it were the twin of a particularly capable relative. Implanting identical twins may seem futuristic and disconcerting, but if such options were available, some people would certainly use them. … At present, low birth rates among the most capable mean there is a tremendous waste of good germinal material. What we take for granted and discard today could become an extremely valuable commodity in the next century. Future generations could benefit greatly from sperm and egg donations from the brightest and fittest, and augment these advantages with artificial twinning and trans-generational cryoconservation. It remains to be seen whether our species has the wisdom and foresight even to think in these terms.”</span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">The only thing that will bring the world to the awareness of the reality of evil in its purest form, how it functions, how it deceives and propagates, is Catholic consciousness. Not Right-wing thinking, or Left-wing thinking, but pure Catholicism. And by Catholicism I am not speaking of the vague emotionalism or callous indifferentism found so much in the nominal Catholic world;<span class="Apple-converted-space">  </span>nor the anti-intellectualism found amongst the more hard Right traditionalist circles, where you will find many sympathizers towards German and Japanese nationalism, or Germanophiles, and sentiments in favor for Fascism. I am speaking of those beautiful teachings one will find in the medieval writings, or the Catholic works of the Renaissance or the Baroque era, or even the impactful words of great modern popes like Pope Pius XII. It is in these works that one will find the most valiant, the most pure and valorous expressions of the Christian Faith. It is in these works that one will find the drive to an incarnational zeal, bringing the energies towards good into a reality, in action against the forces of evil. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">It is in the Catholic theology that one finds the balance between justice and mercy. When one sees these Rightest types saying “KILL ALL MUSLIMS” or “DO NOT ALLOW A SINGLE MEXICAN INTO THE COUNTRY,” through the lens of an unbalanced theology, in conjunction with an overly enthusiastic pull towards national pride, he will think there is nothing wrong with this. But through the prism of an equilibrium between justice and mercy, one will suspect that there is evil in such words. And after looking into it, one will find that such suspicions were correct.<span class="Apple-converted-space">     </span></span></p>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Major British Ethicist Warns: They Are Editing Human Embryos To Create A Super Race Of People Who Will Be The Elites And Who Will Oppress Everyone Else

A major British ethicist has warned that the recent editing of DNA in human embryos in Oregon is part of a sinister plan to create an e...

Read More...»