For The First Time In American History, Scientists Are Editing The Genetics Of Human Embryos And Then Slaughtering The Unborn Babies. This Is Only Going To Lead To The Era Of The Antichrist And The Mass Genocide Of Countless Human Beings

<p>For the first known time in US history, scientists have now experimented on human embryos to edit their DNA. Nothing came out of the experiment, and the babies were simply dumped in the bin. This is something that the eugenists in America have been trying to do as they have envied the license in which scientists in China have been allowed to carry out this transhumanist evil. The experiment was done in Portland, Oregon, and it was led by an Uyghur Turk scientist from Kazakhstan named Shoukhrat Mitalipov of Oregon Health and Science University.</p><div id="attachment_113079" style="width: 697px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/maxresdefault-6.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-113079" height="386" sizes="(max-width: 687px) 100vw, 687px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/maxresdefault-6-1024x576.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/maxresdefault-6-1024x576.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/maxresdefault-6-300x169.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/maxresdefault-6-768x432.jpg 768w" width="687" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Shoukhrat Mitalipov</p></div><p>Mitalipov genetically edited the pre-born human babies by a system known as CRISPR (<em>Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats). </em>For years, experimentations on human embryos have been done in China, with eugenists in America looking with utter jealousy, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/04/11/incredible-research-exposed-secret-us-documents-reveal-how-the-united-states-government-is-designing-the-plan-that-is-moving-the-world-towards-armageddon/">exhorting</a> for the legalization of gene editing on human babies. Now, Mitalipov is being hailed as one who has broken the ice in the United States and demonstrated that the manipulation of human genetics in embryos can be done to make "healthy children," or as one <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.technologyreview.com/s/608350/first-human-embryos-edited-in-us/">report</a> puts it:</p><blockquote><p>Now Mitalipov is believed to have broken new ground both in the number of embryos experimented upon and by demonstrating that it is possible to safely and efficiently correct defective genes that cause inherited diseases.</p><p>Although none of the embryos were allowed to develop for more than a few days—and there was never any intention of implanting them into a womb—the experiments are a milestone on what may prove to be an inevitable journey toward the birth of the first genetically modified humans.</p></blockquote><p>So they say.</p><p>Mitalipov declined to reveal the results of the human experiment, but said that they will be in a pending research paper.</p><p>By editing the genetic makeup of a human embryo, these eugenists believe that they can create humans who will be born without disease. Its all part of the transhumanist utopian vision of a perfect world without aging or death. This transhumanist ideology is part of the Antichrist system; for in their hatred of Christ, Who defeated death on the Cross, they want to be the victors over death. By being antichrists, they are anti-human, saying with their father the devil, "I will exalt my throne above the stars of God" (Isaiah 14:13). And do not forget the words of the wise Solomon: "all they that hate me love death." (Proverbs 8:36)</p><p>The transhumanists believe that they can defeat aging by manipulating or eradicating certain genes that they believe are the causers of aging or disease. They want to be "natural selection," the god of Darwin, and 'select' the baby who should die and the baby who should be born. They want to 'select' the genes that are causing death in the perverted view that they can create a super human -- a <em>Übermensch</em> -- and this is purely a genocidal utopian vision. Because they will never create a human who will never die, their genetic experiments will never be successful, and the end result of their masterplan will be to exterminate all those who they deem genetically inferior, or those who they see as genetic obstacles to their darwinian envisage of perfectly evolved mortals.</p><p>Now they are just experimenting on pre-born humans, to "edit" their genetic makeup, and what will happen when they realize that they will never "edit" a human to be this perfectly healthy person? They will turn to other forms of anti-human despotism: from those who are small embryos, they will move their tyrannical hands to more developed humans, to children and to adults.</p><p>According to the same report, this recently done human experiment was called “'germline engineering'” because any genetically modified child would then pass the changes on to subsequent generations via their own germ cells—the egg and sperm." This right here gives us an idea on their sinister plans. They want to "edit" an embryo to have superior genes, so that it could "pass on" those genes in procreation. This is all about "selecting" those who lives and who dies; the ones with the good genes are to be allowed to live and perpetuate their genetic makeup, and the ones who are without these genes should not be allowed to be born, but are to only be exterminated. This is what they are really trying to say. As bioethicist Alta Charo said:</p><blockquote><p>“Genome editing to enhance traits or abilities beyond ordinary health raises concerns about whether the benefits can outweigh the risks, and about fairness if available only to some people"</p></blockquote><p>In their vile social-Darwinist thinking, if inferior genes are allowed to continue on, they hinder the process of evolving to perfection; thus, those who are born with genes that are 'holding back' humanity, need to be exterminated, while those with the genetic makeup that allows for a life without disease or aging, need to be the ones who procreate. This is all Nazism, repackaged.</p><p>The Nazis of the past were more honest, they said they wanted to create a master race, the overman or Übermensch of Nietzsche;<em> </em>they said they wanted to exterminate people. <span class="s1">In 1880, Frederich Nietzsche wrote:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p9"><span class="s1">“The tendency must be towards the rendering extinct of the wretched, the deformed, the degenerate.”</span></p></blockquote><p>Nietzsche was evil, but he was open about his evil. Now, today's readers of Nietzsche, while fantasizing about being a Übermensch, present themselves with clean cut millennial suits, smiles and modern faces; the Nazis of today come to us with talk of "human innovation," and of "bioengineering" -- when they really mean genocide.</p><p>The Uyghur Turk, Mitalipov is like the Young Turks of the 20th century Ottoman Empire who butchered millions of Christians not entirely in the name of Islam, but rather in the cause of eugenics, since the Young Turks wanted to create a 'homogenous' society purged of those they considered 'inferior' to the Turkish race. The Ottoman empire was a major force of the Antichrist, and in being within the Antichrist system, it accepted and implemented Darwinism when the evil ideology became very popular in Western nations.</p><p>Eugenics, as it was in the past, is being promoted by homosexuals, which is not surprising since St. John describes the Antichrist system as "Sodom and Egypt" (Revelation 11:8), a perfect description of the evils that we see violently intensifying, that is, the rise of homosexuality and paganism. One of the sodomites who is promoting eugenics is Milo Yiannopolous, a degenerate who has become an idol of the Rightwing as they bow down before the gods of Sodom and Gomorrah. In an article published by Breitbart, Milo <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/07/04/major-leader-of-the-catholic-church-declares-men-who-sodomize-each-other-can-take-holy-communion/">wrote</a> that “gay men are smarter: we test higher for IQ than our heterosexual counterparts. Intelligence allows us to 'transcend' our evolutionary programming, according to evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa, which may explain the correlation between homosexuality and high IQ.”</p><p>What is disturbing, is that even after Milo <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/02/19/milo-yiannopoulos-supports-pedophilia-and-declares-to-all-americans-that-they-must-support-elderly-homosexual-men-sodomizing-thirteen-year-old-boys/">explicitly pushed</a> for the normalization and acceptance of pedophilia, the Rightwing -- who incessantly go on and on like a broken record about how Muhammad had sex with a nine-year old girl -- still trip on each other's toes to revere this vile heretic. Just a few days ago, the Horowitz Freedom Center, one of the major operations of the American Rightwing, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/267317/milo-david-horowitz-freedom-center-frontpagemagcom">had</a> Milo on to speak, and the crowd -- filled with people who no doubt see themselves as morally upright -- of course revered him as he boasted about being a "dangerous Faggot".  David Horowitz introduced this sodomite nazi with the typical sycophancy so commonly expressed towards degenerates, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.truthrevolt.org/commentary/david-horowitz-introduces-milo-freedom-center-book-launch">saying</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Milo Yiannopoulos is a warrior the likes of whom no Republican Party or conservative movement has ever seen. As a gay man, and a flamboyant one, he is in his own person a weapon against the left’s preposterous claim to speak on behalf of the so-called marginalized and oppressed. Not that being gay has protected Milo from vicious personal attacks, intended to destroy him. Being gay threw his enemies off balance so he could deliver many <em>coups de gras</em>. But rank hypocrisy or belief in their own b.s. has never proved an obstacle to leftwing malevolence. Few individuals have ever been subjected to the kind of personal abuse that Milo has had to suffer in his service to the cause. But Milo - for all his fey limp-wristedness - is an incredibly strong and brave man. There are few political figures who have displayed the kind of courage that Milo has regularly shown on the field of battle.</p></blockquote><p>Milo -- a sodomite who said that "I think in the gay World some of the most important enriching and incredibly the… mm … you know life affirming, important shaping relationships very often between younger boys and older men, they can be hugely positive experiences" -- is to a Rightwinger like David Horowitz,  "a warrior the likes of whom no Republican Party or conservative movement has ever seen." This is how sickening the Rightwing is. They are like the Pharisees, for they while promoting nationalism conspire with the very forces they claim to be against, to make war upon Christ Himself.</p><p>Now, why would a person like David Horowitz, someone who has spent years fighting against what he calls "cultural marxism," work with a eugenist nazi sodomite? Its because he is a part of this evil system himself. David Horowitz, and those like him, are acolytes of the Antichrist, the religion of which consists of heresy, paganism, homosexuality, eugenics and transhumanism.</p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">David Horowitz, the founder of FrontPage Magazine and the Horowitz Freedom Center, has a son named Ben Horowitz, a major American industrialist and blogger, who resides in Silicon Valley. Ben Horowitz founded the venture capital firm, <em>Andreessen Horowitz</em>, co-founded by fellow Silicon Valley investor, Marc Andreessen.</span></p><div id="attachment_113080" style="width: 410px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ben2_400x400.jpeg"><img alt="" class="size-full wp-image-113080" height="400" sizes="(max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ben2_400x400.jpeg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ben2_400x400.jpeg 400w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ben2_400x400-150x150.jpeg 150w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ben2_400x400-300x300.jpeg 300w" width="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Ben Horowitz</p></div><p> </p><div id="attachment_113081" style="width: 547px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/marc-andreessen.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-113081" height="403" sizes="(max-width: 537px) 100vw, 537px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/marc-andreessen.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/marc-andreessen.jpg 480w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/marc-andreessen-300x225.jpg 300w" width="537" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Marc Andreessen</p></div><p class="p1"><span class="s2"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://medium.com/@producthunt/ben-horowitz-s-best-startup-advice-7e8c09c8de1b">In an interview</a></span><span class="s1">, Ben Horowitz was asked: “If you had to start your career all over again, where would you start today?” to which Ben responded by saying: “I think that I would be a bio hacker. Computational biology is the most exciting thing that I’ve ever seen. I’d love to work in that field.” Bio hacking is essentially the manipulation of genetics to make someone “better,” hence this is where the transhumanist ideology comes in: the altering of the human genome to “defeat aging.” </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">The official website for the Andreessen Horowitz investment firm promotes a very bizarre thing fancily called “parabiosis” or, simply put, the idea of injecting the blood of youths into old people to keep them alive. This is vampirism. It is an idea of the eugenist transhumanist agenda, which claims to be “fighting aging.” <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://a16z.com/2017/04/17/life-extension-geroscience-aging/"><span class="s2">On the website it says</span></a>: “Far from science fiction, recent discoveries have given us a whole crop of promising breakthroughs to treat aging, such as parabiosis (young blood infused into old blood)”. Ultimately, this is all about farming humans, to harvest their blood for the elite oligarchs, as the Aztecs farmed humans to spill their blood for their diabolical rituals. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s2"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://a16z.com/2017/02/23/yuval-harari-from-homo-sapiens-to-homo-deus/">On February of 2017, Ben Horowitz’s firm interviewed</a></span><span class="s1"> Yuval Harari who -- like Milo -- is an Israeli eugenist and homosexual who is a major advocate for transhumanism. Harari wants to create his own transhumanist utopia in which human beings are replaced by machines, and their brains are unified with computers; also, in this very sick utopia, Harari envisions a socialist society in which the new religion of the world will declare that “we” are gods. Harari makes this diabolical envisaging clear on Ben Horowitz’s website. During the interview, Sonal Chokshi, who works for Horowitz Andreessen, asks Harari: “What do humans have to believe to make this reality continue happening? Will they not have any agency in any of this? Because it sounds like we’re almost talking about these uploaded brains in a vat. And is there any sense of coordination, consciously? Is there a new religion? … What do people have to believe in this new world? What is there religion?” To this, Harari says:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“I think we are seeing and we will see more and more the rise of techno religions, religions based on technology that make all the old promises of traditional religions; they promise justice and happiness, and even immortality and paradise. But here on earth, with the help of technology, there already has been one very important techno-religion in history, which is socialism, which came in the 19th century with the industrial revolution. And what Marx and Lennon basically said: we will create paradise on earth with the help of technology, steam engines, electricity and so forth. When Lennon was once asked to define communism in a single sentence, the answer he gave was: Communism is power to the workers’ councils, plus electrification of the whole country. You cannot establish a communist regime without industrialization. Its based on the technology of the industrial revolution, electricity and steam engines and so forth. And the idea is that we will use this technology to create paradise on earth. It didn’t really work that well. So now I think we will see the second wave of techno-religions. Now we have genetics, and now we have big data, and above all we have algorithms. Our salvation — paradise will come from the algorithms.” </span></p></blockquote><div id="attachment_113082" style="width: 691px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Yuval-Noah-Harari.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-113082" height="383" sizes="(max-width: 681px) 100vw, 681px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Yuval-Noah-Harari.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Yuval-Noah-Harari.jpg 851w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Yuval-Noah-Harari-300x169.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Yuval-Noah-Harari-768x431.jpg 768w" width="681" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Yuval Harari</p></div><p class="p1"><span class="s1">After this, Kyle Russell, another person who works for Horowitz Andreessen, said that we would have to "sacrifice our own humanity" to machines and by this, become gods:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“We’re hitting some kind of productivity cap as normal humans that autonomous machines and systems are going to beat us, so we have to sacrifice our own humanity to increase our own productivity, and augment ourselves. You can almost see the emergence of some kind of powerful ideology, like, the religion of the 21st century onward is, <strong>we are the gods</strong>?” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">To this, Harari said:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“This is actually an old idea. Humanism, which goes back to the 18th century, even 17th century, is saying humans are the gods, humans are the source of all meaning and authority. Everything you expected previously from the gods, to give legitimacy to political systems, to make decisions in ethics, humanism comes in and says the highest source of authority in politics is the voter, the highest source of authority in economics is the customer, the highest source of authority in ethics is your own feelings, humans are the gods. Now we are entering a post-humanist era, authority is shifting away from humans. If, in the last 300 years we authority descending from the clouds to earth, to humans, now authority is shifting back to the clouds, but not to God, but to the Google cloud, to the Microsoft cloud. The basic idea of this, if you want, new religion or new ideology, is again, that given enough data, and enough computing power, and algorithms, can understand me better than I can understand myself, and make decisions for me, in the end religion is about authority.”<span class="Apple-converted-space">           </span></span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">They want to manufacture a utopia — a dark society — in which there is a hierarchy, where elites rule over everyone else, using human beings as slaves to their techno-cult. This idea that "humans are the source of all meaning and authority" is an utterly genocidal idea; for if humans are the moral authority, then Stalin and Hitler are the moral authorities, since they were indeed humans. </span></p><div id="attachment_113083" style="width: 469px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/kyle_russell2.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-113083" height="459" sizes="(max-width: 459px) 100vw, 459px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/kyle_russell2.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/kyle_russell2.jpg 400w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/kyle_russell2-150x150.jpg 150w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/kyle_russell2-300x300.jpg 300w" width="459" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Kyle Russel</p></div><p class="p2"><span class="s1">Kyle Russel, who works for Ben Horowitz and who interviewed the Israeli eugenist, Yuval Harari, is also a eugenist himself. Silicon Valley is filled with these types of people — I call them, hipster nazis. These are basically far leftists who are the most radical about the Theory of Evolution. They are, essentially, people who have actually read Darwin. They want to see and implement the purest imposition of Darwin’s ideology of Natural Selection. The same can be said for the far-rightest who believes in “race realism” and use Darwinism to justify their genocidal ideology. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Kyle Russel is a supporter of the company, <em>Counsyl</em>, stationed in San Francisco. Counsyl is a company that pregnant women go to to have their wombs screened, to see if their child will have any diseases or deformities. Counsyl prides itself in the computer technology it utilizes to conduct this procedure, and if their computers say that a child tests positive for physical complications, the Silicon Valley funded company will notify the parents. But here is where eugenics comes in: Counsyl actually will do in vitro fertilization (IVF), in that they will fertilize several eggs, take the embryo that is the most preferred, and destroy the rest. This destruction is pure eugenics; it is the demonic pursuit of preventing certain ‘undesirable genes’ from being passed on through the extermination of certain people. In the words of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.counsyl.com/services/foresight/">official website of Counsyl: </a></span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), done with IVF, can greatly reduce the chances of passing on irregular genes to your baby. Fertility specialists look at the genes of several of your embryos and place the healthiest in your womb.”</span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">What Counsyl is doing in this case has been guised under the sophistical title of “selective pregnancy reduction,” or the selection of one embryo over the others for its desirable genetic makeup. <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vcnewsdaily.com/counsyl/venture-capital-funding/qpdgmmqnwx"><span class="s2">Counsyl is financed</span></a> by Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners and Goldman Sachs Asset Management, which is telling because Goldman Sachs also finances Planned Parenthood, which is not so surprising since both are eugenist establishments. In fact, in May of this year, Marc Andreessen, Ben Horowitz's partner, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.recode.net/2017/3/16/14933924/marc-andreessen-reed-hastings-cecile-richards-netflix-planned-parenthood-code">shared a platform</a> with the president of Planned Parenthood, Cecile Richards.  </span></p><div id="attachment_113085" style="width: 589px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/horowitz-andreessen-copy.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-113085" height="422" sizes="(max-width: 579px) 100vw, 579px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/horowitz-andreessen-copy-1024x746.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/horowitz-andreessen-copy-1024x746.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/horowitz-andreessen-copy-300x219.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/horowitz-andreessen-copy-768x559.jpg 768w" width="579" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Snapshot of an advertisement for the event for Marc Andreessen (left) and Cecile Richards (right)</p></div><p>This is the same Cecile Richards who makes profits out of the harvesting and selling of the organs of human babies aborted by Planned Parenthood. If these genocidal people are harvesting children like animals, they will do the same evils to any other human being, regardless of size or age.</p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">When the Second World War ended, eugenics became a taboo subject. But, people like those in Silicon Valley, now must do their evil schemes under a different cover: under the guise of ‘technological innovation,’ pseudo-medical jargon that speaks of plugging in human brains to computer systems; the eugenics of today is done under the guise of “fighting aging” or making a “cure for aging.” Its all a chimera, a delusion to perdition. We awe ourselves into the realm of bloodlust, with the destruction of the innocent being done under the gazes of evil men of prestige. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Jared Taylor, one of the pioneers of the so-called “Alt Right” also promotes this evil and calls it “embryo selection.” Jared Taylor said in <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVmTkMWa-EI"><span class="s2">one interview</span></a>:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“I believe that an enlightened European people will begin to think in terms of improving itself genetically. I think there are positive eugenic steps that could be taken, embryo selection is one”<span class="Apple-converted-space">     </span></span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Embryo selection”  is the choosing of which unborn child is more deserving to live than the others, for no other reason than its genetic makeup. Moreover, the procedure of screening pregnant women to see if a child has Down’s Syndrome, is an action done to incentivize infanticide. On the official website for Counsyl, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.counsyl.com/services/informed-pregnancy-screen/?utm_term=counsyl&utm_campaign=construction&utm_medium=cpc&utm_source=google&gclid=CLzApMHMmtQCFQyLaQodT3EGEQ"><span class="s2">it reads</span></a>: “As early as week 10, find out if your baby has an increased chance for chromosome conditions like Down syndrome.” On the same website, it talks about the passing down of genes that give a child's eye and hair color, and also the genes that give diseases:</span></p><blockquote><p>The genes babies inherit from their parents pass along family characteristics like hair and eye color. Sometimes they also pass on genetic diseases, even if the parents don’t have any symptoms. If two people are carriers for the same condition, there’s a one in four chance their children could develop symptoms.</p></blockquote><p>There is an underlying message in all this talk. Notice that it first makes mention of the genes that give "hair and eye color" before it speaks of diseases. The use of fear of disease is the initial strategy to accept eugenics as some sort of a life saver, or as a solution against disease. But, at the end of the day it is about creating their ideal human, their ideal society, in which only certain people will be allowed the right of birth and of life, based on their specific genetic makeup.</p><div id="attachment_113087" style="width: 343px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/2e3c85b22e54b1404f6c0e97fac2cd2d-aryan-race-sabotage.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-113087" height="479" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/2e3c85b22e54b1404f6c0e97fac2cd2d-aryan-race-sabotage.jpg" width="333" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nazi propaganda, showing the "ideal" human</p></div><p>The CEO of Counsyl is Ramji Srinivasan. On his Twitter account he supports the “Biotech” work of major Silicon Valley eugenist, Peter Thiel. Srinivasan shared a post done by his own company, Counsyl, supporting Thiel:</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/cj-thiel-counsyl-copy.jpg"><img alt="" class="aligncenter wp-image-113086" height="450" sizes="(max-width: 616px) 100vw, 616px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/cj-thiel-counsyl-copy-1024x749.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/cj-thiel-counsyl-copy-1024x749.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/cj-thiel-counsyl-copy-300x219.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/cj-thiel-counsyl-copy-768x562.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/cj-thiel-counsyl-copy.jpg 1438w" width="616" /></a></p><p class="p1"><span class="s2"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.technologyreview.com/s/535771/a-contrarian-in-biotech/">The article </a></span><span class="s1">posted was written by another tech-eugenist, Antonio Regalado, and advocates for the work of Austen Heinz, whose “Cambrian Genomics” is a company funded by Thiel and is all about genetic engineering in pursuit for the objective of creating babies designed by computers:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“These days, you can order DNA online, crowdfund a genetic engineering project, or outsource experiments. Austen Heinz, CEO of Cambrian Genomics, a company that sells built-to-order DNA strands, says you can imagine what will happen if biotech becomes as easy as software to try and to test. An ‘explosion of biotech companies is coming,’ he says.” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Heinz’s company, Cambrian Genomics, wants to create ‘designer babies,’ the procedure of which involves parents picking which genetic traits they desire in their child.<span class="Apple-converted-space">  </span>“Every human being will be designed on a computer, and that’s something we’re starting right now with Happy Healthy Baby,” says Mr. Heinz, founder and CEO of Cambrian Genomics.</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1"> Eggs are fertilized in vitro, and the unborn children that are then conceived are under the mercy of the parents’ genetic preference. One child is chosen, and the rest destroyed. This is what the elite nazis at Silicon Valley want, a world where human life is exterminated simply over the whims of a hypergamous perception of what are desirable genetic traits. If the nazis of the past said, “Gott mit uns” (God with us), then the nazis of the future will declare “Gott ist uns” (God is us). The Nazis of old decried that humanity was not taking control of “natural selection,” and wanted to be the selectors of who lives and who dies. Now, parents can do the same exact thing, but this time in a nice clean building in their clean cut, White liberal environment in the Bay Area. This “selection” was referred to by Austen Heinz when he said in an <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://ipscell.com/2015/01/cambrian/"><span class="s2">interview</span></a>: </span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Already people are designing babies digitally via selection whether through pre-implant genetic diagnosis or through mitochondrial embryo transplant i.e. 3 parent babies.”</span></p></blockquote><div id="attachment_113088" style="width: 635px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/austenheinz-SciencepreneurExtraordinairePioneersFestival2014_60618.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-113088" height="290" sizes="(max-width: 625px) 100vw, 625px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/austenheinz-SciencepreneurExtraordinairePioneersFestival2014_60618-1024x475.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/austenheinz-SciencepreneurExtraordinairePioneersFestival2014_60618-1024x475.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/austenheinz-SciencepreneurExtraordinairePioneersFestival2014_60618-300x139.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/austenheinz-SciencepreneurExtraordinairePioneersFestival2014_60618-768x356.jpg 768w" width="625" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Austen Heinz</p></div><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Heinz himself must not have been the superhuman he wanted to be, since he eventually committed suicide. Bioethicist professor at Standford, Hank Greely, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/06/16/482189322/will-baby-making-move-from-the-bedroom-to-the-lab"><span class="s2">predicts</span></a> that soon wealthy people will not have sex to procreate, but for simply pleasure, and will have babies through “embryo selection,” in which the “doctor” will present one hundred embryos and people will choose which one they want, based on genetic traits, while the other ninety-nine will be exterminated:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Yes, I think we will see an increased and broad use of embryo selection. I would be careful to set the time frame at 20-40 years. I think we'll actually see a world where most babies born to people with good health coverage will be conceived in the lab. People will make about a hundred embryos, each will have its whole genome tested, and the parents will be [asked ... "Tell] us what you want to know and then tell us what embryo you want."</span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1"> Heinz says he thinks "in general most people want children that are healthier than they were — maybe better. I think as a race, or as a species we have a goal of improving who we are.” These people want to do “gene hacking,” manipulating human DNA to create a “better” human. The whole thing sounds like it would tickle the ears of Mengele himself. Certain DNA is “superior,” and this<span class="Apple-converted-space">  </span>“superior” DNA should dominate over the rest. This is eugenics, pure and simple. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Hollywood enjoys portraying demonic possession with people flying in the air and different voices coming out of their mouths, and while these things do happen, they are a rarity. The reality is that people under the influence or possession of the diabolical, do actions that lead to the destruction of human life.</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>FRONTPAGE MAGAZINE AND SILICON VALLEY</strong> </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Now, I know there will be people who will say that Ben Horowitz is not his father, David Horowitz, and that their views should not be associated together. But, this argument does not stand against the reality that on Front Page Magazine itself, there are articles written by the Norwegian eugenist, Peder Are Nøstvold Jensen, commonly known by his pseudonym, Fjordman. </span></p><div id="attachment_113101" style="width: 676px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Peder_Nøstvold_Jensen-fjordman003.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-113101" height="375" sizes="(max-width: 666px) 100vw, 666px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Peder_Nøstvold_Jensen-fjordman003-1024x576.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Peder_Nøstvold_Jensen-fjordman003-1024x576.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Peder_Nøstvold_Jensen-fjordman003-300x169.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Peder_Nøstvold_Jensen-fjordman003-768x432.jpg 768w" width="666" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Fjordman</p></div><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Apparently, David Horowitz has no problem with allowing him to write eugenist arguments on his website. For example, in 2012, Horowitz’s magazine published an article by Fjordman entitled, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/135806/price-european-immigration-fjordman"><span class="s2">“The Price of European Migration,” </span></a>in which he said:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“A few skilled immigrants from India or elsewhere can compete, but mainly those from East Asia: Japanese, Koreans, Chinese, and to some extent Vietnamese. All other non-Western immigrants show lower levels of skill and competence than Europeans, many of them a lot lower. It should be mentioned here that these numbers correlate quite well with average IQ, where a few other Asians can compete with Europeans, but primarily East Asians. Other ethnic groups cannot do so. Although it has become taboo to say this in the modern Western world, it is well-documented fact that IQ correlates well with economic level, for individuals as well as for nations. The scholar Charles Murray has written much about this.”</span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Now, before you go off on the typical argument that “Maybe Horowitz doesn’t know!” or “Maybe the people who run FrontPage can’t keep track of everything posted on their site,” I will have you know that the people who run this website are very stringent and review each article before they are published. I know this from my own experience. I dealt with Jamie Glazov, the managing editor at Front Page numerous times, and he, while publishing a good amount of my previous articles, refused to publish a few of my writings because they had Christian messages. There was one article that Glazov refused to publish because it described Islam as being satanic. In one email to me he wrote:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Hi Theodore, sorry we gotta pass on this one. But keep them coming. Also please keep in mind Theodore, that Frontpage doesn't get into Islam being "Satanic"....we are a political journal.” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">In another email, Glazov said to me that “we do not enter the religious terrain....like obviously we support the Judeo-Christian tradition, but we do not talk about Satan and/or how the 2nd Amendment is a right given by God”. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">In FrontPage Magazine, you can’t talk about God or the reality of the diabolical, but you can sure promote eugenist and social-Darwinist beliefs. <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/192534/muslim-riots-and-leftist-willful-blindness-fjordman"><span class="s2">In another article written by Fjordman</span></a>, and published by Front Page, it says:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Of course, if you look into the taboo subject of genetic intelligence measured in mean IQ, saying that Pakistanis or Turks have “smarter” brains than northern Europeans is utter nonsense.” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s2"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/188140/uniqueness-western-civilization-fjordman">In yet another article written by Fjordman</a></span><span class="s1"> and published by Front Page, the Norwegian eugenist references the American self-proclaimed “white separatist,” Michael H. Hart, in writing on his beliefs in inherited IQ in Europeans. In one part he says, “Michael H. Hart in his book Understanding Human History views the flow of human history primarily through the prism of IQ differences among various ethnic groups. This does indeed explain many things, although it has become politically sensitive to say as much in the Western world today, but it does not explain everything. No single factor ever does.” </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">He then goes on to say that the “European restless spirit, individual curiosity and innate desire to seek out new horizons … eventually led humanity from donkeys to space travel. If any civilization or groups of people on this planet were destined to leave Earth behind and begin exploring the vastness of space, it was the Europeans. Evidence indicates that no non-European nation or culture, not even the most sophisticated of these, ever came close to making a similar breakthrough on their own.” </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">David Horowitz, Jamie Glazgov and the rest of the Right-wing gang in Front Page Magazine have no issue with this type of writing, but they have so much animosity towards articles that express the Christian Faith and explain the realities of the demonic. Robert Spencer and the rest of these Right-wing loons, will wail and holler at someone who believes in laws punishing sodomites, but they have no issue publishing the works of this eugenist, Fjordman, who writes openly on his belief in the superiority of the German and Northern European races. He <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2010/01/iq-and-human-accomplishment-debate.html"><span class="s2">writes</span></a>:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Regarding the Germans, this is an intriguing question. I am quite convinced that IQ is an important variable and I have seen several rankings listing the Germans as having the highest average IQ in Europe. Nevertheless, IQ does not explain everything. No single factor ever does. For instance, it does not explain why Europeans and people of European origins outperformed East Asians by such a wide margin, despite the fact that the latter match us in average IQ. It is interesting that very roughly speaking, IQ increases the further north you get. This means that Europe as a whole has higher IQ than the Middle East, and much higher than tropical Africa. However, there are also minor differences within Europe, and not necessarily statistically insignificant ones. Europeans north of the Alps have slightly higher IQs than those in southern Europe. It is possible to argue that the Swedes and Dutch have outperformed some of the Balkan peoples because of this. The Italians are often listed as having the highest mean IQ in southern Europe, which is consistent with the fact that Italians make up the southern European nation that ranks the highest in modern human accomplishment. The greatest riddle are the Greeks, who in ancient times could produce great geniuses such as Aristotle, Archimedes and Hipparchus, but today have one of the lowest IQs on the European continent.”</span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">In 1997, David Horowitz wrote an <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=24393">article</a> for his publication, FrontPage Magazine, praising the Silicon Valley millionaire, Ron Unz, because he funded a ballot initiative for a program called “English for Children" that would teach the children of Mexican immigrants the English language. Horowitz wrote:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Ron Unz, a right-wing Republican candidate in the last gubernatorial election and Silicon Valley millionaire, has put his money behind a ballot measure called the English Language Education for Immigrant Children Initiative (or the shortened English for Children). Imagine! In 1997, in America, it takes a ballot initiative to give Spanish-speaking immigrants the right to have their children educated in the language of the country in which they have chosen to live, and thus enhance their opportunity to succeed. … Now Tuchman has joined Unz in a coalition that includes Latinos, conservatives and even some leftists in support of the English for Children initiative.” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Once you make an evil as part of a discussion, you normalize it, you have set it off and don’t even need to openly defend it. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">While the idea of a program to teach Hispanic children English seems harmless and beneficial, there is a sinister agenda behind the work of Ron Unz. This Silicon Valley elite is a major eugenist. In the work of Unz, it is so filled with sophistical code talk, one must read between the lines to see that he is promoting eugenics. What Unz, and the rest of these modern eugenists do, is present eugenist arguments, express some doubt about them, and then affirm that the Darwinist arguments present good evidence that we can learn from. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">They will refer to the advocation of eugenics as merely being a part of a “discussion” as opposed to either explicitly calling it evil, or affirming that it is good. By making something as heinous as eugenics as being simply a part of a “debate” or “conversation,” these sophists directly normalize eugenics. For decades, homosexual activists made their depravities as simply part of debate; abortionists made infanticide simply part of a debate. Today you have people, like Milo Yiannopoulos, who want to make pedophilia into a part of a discussion. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Eugenists, wanting to remove the stigma against their movement that was made after the end of the Second World War, have been making open Social Darwinism as part of a simple discourse. Once evil is not explicitly condemned, and becomes a part of common discourse, it is normalized, and then soon, tolerated, and ultimately, imposed.“But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.” (Matthew 5:37) Speaking nonchalantly about evil, is a means to making it common and acceptable. It is as if someone asks you, “Would you murder someone for a million dollars,” and you respond with: “I’ll have to think about that.” Right when a question on whether or not to do evil isn’t replied to with an emphatic answer of repulsion, then we have entered the realm of evil being tolerated. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s2"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/race-iq-and-wealth/">In one of Unz’s articles</a></span><span class="s1">, he introduces the work of eugenists Richard Lyne and Tatu Vanhanen (both of whose work is promoted by Robert Spencer’s partner, Sigurfrey Jonasson <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/06/10/major-evidence-reveals-that-robert-spencer-is-working-with-genocidal-satanist-nazi-cult-that-plans-to-eradicate-all-christians-in-concentration-camps/">on whom we have written extensively</a>), that some races are inherently superior in intelligence than others:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Although ‘intelligence’ may be difficult to define precisely, most people have accepted that IQ scores seem to constitute a rough and measurable proxy for this trait, so Lynn and Vanhanen have collected a vast number of national IQ scores from the last 50 or 60 years and compared these to income levels and economic growth rates. Since experts have discovered that nominal IQ scores over the last century or so have tended to rise at a seemingly constant rate—the so-called “Flynn Effect”—the authors adjusted their raw scores accordingly. Having done so, they found a strong correlation of around 0.50–0.75 between the Flynn-adjusted IQ of a nation’s population and its real per capita GDP over the last few decades, seemingly indicating that smarter peoples tend to be wealthier and more successful. From this statistical fact, Lynn and Vanhanen draw the conclusion that intelligence leads to economic success and—since they argue that intelligence itself is largely innate and genetic—that the relative development ranking of the long list of nations they analyze is unlikely to change much over time, nor will the economic standing of the various groups within ethnically mixed countries, including the United States.”</span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Now, while he references two eugenists — one of which, Richard Lynn, supports and advocates for a Social Darwinist autocratic despotism — he will then express that there may be some reason to doubt what they say.</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">By expressing doubt, Unz makes it difficult to pin point his beliefs. It is a strategy that is done to prevent people from outright exposing him. When someone does expose him, he can simply say, ‘I pointed out in the article that there are doubts in these theories, so I am not what you think I am.’ It is a strategy of deception, of sophism covering up academic ways for promoting genocide. In another part of the article, Unz writes: </span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Not unreasonably, many psychometric experts have argued that these results prove that IQ is largely determined by genetic factors and cannot be changed via environmental influences within any normal range. Lynn and Vanhanen cite several of these studies to argue that IQ is at least 80 percent hereditary.” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Regardless of all of his expressions of doubt, when this deviant describes eugenist beliefs as being “not unreasonably” believed, it indicates that he himself is a Social Darwinist. The evil scheme behind conveying these most destructive beliefs, is to communicate them within the vehicle<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>of “objectivism” and a sprinkling of doubt here and there in order to appear “reasonable.” And at the same time, he describes these evil beliefs as not "unreasonable."</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">In the same article, Unz attacks Charles Kenny for his writing against eugenists Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen, and also for his referencing of the work of scientist Stephan Jay Gould, that the skulls of blacks and whites are the same: </span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Although Kenny suggested that many of his targets had been circumspect in how they raised these highly controversial ideas, he singled out IQ and the Wealth of Nations, published in 2001 by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen, as a particularly extreme and hateful example of this trend. These authors explicitly argue that IQ scores for different populations are largely fixed and hereditary, and that these—rather than economic or governmental structures—tend to determine the long-term wealth of a given country.</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Kenny claimed that such IQ theories were not merely racist and deeply offensive but had also long been debunked by scientific experts—notably the prominent biologist Stephen Jay Gould in his 1980 book The Mismeasure of Man.</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">As Kenny soon discovered from the responses to his online article, he had seriously erred in quoting the authority of Gould, whose fraud on race and brain-size issues, presumably in service to his self-proclaimed Marxist beliefs, last year received further coverage in the New York Times. Science largely runs on the honor system, and once simple statements of fact—in Gould’s case, the physical volume of human skulls—are found to be false, we cannot trust more complex claims made by the particular scholar.”</span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">At the end of the article he praises Lynn and Vanhanen — both eugenists and racists — and scolded Gould for his simple belief that races are equal: </span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“I would be the first to acknowledge my gratitude to the scholars whose efforts made my own analysis possible. Meanwhile, individuals such as Stephen Jay Gould, who commit outright academic fraud in support of their ideological positions, do enormous damage to the credibility of their own camp.” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">His “gratitude” for two eugenists and his accusation of fraud towards Gould, show the true intentions of Ron Unz and those like him: he does not want to appear as an open eugenist, but his sly and elusive way of writing signifies his Social Darwinist sentiments. We need to awaken our own awareness of how this style of deception functions. Instead of focusing so much on the overly honest devils, we must work on combating the more deceptive works of the more dangerous cunning devils.</span></p><div id="attachment_113089" style="width: 409px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/related_ron-unz_gd_160531.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-113089" height="399" sizes="(max-width: 399px) 100vw, 399px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/related_ron-unz_gd_160531.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/related_ron-unz_gd_160531.jpg 600w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/related_ron-unz_gd_160531-150x150.jpg 150w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/related_ron-unz_gd_160531-300x300.jpg 300w" width="399" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Ron Unz</p></div><p class="p1"><span class="s1">In another article, Ron Unz argues that the reason why China has become economically so successful is because millions of Chinese died due to poverty and genocide done by the Japanese and Communists. The title of the article is, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.unz.com/runz/how-social-darwinism-made-modern-china-248/"><span class="s2">“How Social Darwinism Made Modern China”</span></a> and it argues that through “Malthusian” starvation, China became a better country. In other words, through genocide, the “unfit” die off and the ones who survive are left to pass on their superior genes. Unz does not explicitly say this, but when you start using terms such as “Social Darwinism” — which is the belief that the process of evolution will continue by killing off the “unfit” so that the “good” genes will perpetuate without taint — and “Malthusian” — which is the ideology of Thomas Malthus who believed that in order to prevent the poor for consuming resources, they need to be killed off — it is obvious that a eugenic message is being implied. He writes in his article:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“The widespread devastation produced by the Japanese invasion, World War II, and the Chinese Civil War, followed by the economic calamity of Maoism, did delay the predicted rise of China by a generation or two, but except for such unforeseen events, their analysis of Chinese potential seems remarkably prescient.”</span></p></blockquote><div id="attachment_113090" style="width: 810px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Nanking_bodies_1937.jpg"><img alt="" class="size-full wp-image-113090" height="559" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Nanking_bodies_1937.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Nanking_bodies_1937.jpg 800w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Nanking_bodies_1937-300x210.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Nanking_bodies_1937-768x537.jpg 768w" width="800" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Chinese victims of Japanese genocide. To Unz, these are the 'unfit' people who needed to die so that the survival of the fittest could be carried out</p></div><p class="p1"><span class="s1"> In other words, genocide was beneficial to the Chinese because, through the Darwinian chaos of “survival of the fittest,” the fittest survived, the “unfit” were butchered, and better genes were perpetuated without any competition from people of “lower” genetic makeup. He continues on to write:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“On the less fortunate side, the enormous population growth of recent centuries had gradually caught up with and overtaken China’s exceptionally efficient agricultural system, reducing the lives of most Chinese to the brink of Malthusian starvation; and these pressures and constraints were believed to be reflected in the Chinese people.” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Observe the words that he uses. “Malthusian starvation”, the use of such a term indicates what he is saying: genocide is good because it kills off the weak, while enabling the fittest to procreate their genes and make future generations superior to those who were wiped out. In another part of the article, Unz again advocates for Malthusian ideology. Referencing the economist Gregory Clark, Unz argues that what brought about the industrial revolution in England was that wealthier people were able to have more children, whereas the poor, being not as economically successful, had a higher infant mortality rate, or poorer health, and so died off more, leaving those of better “traits” to become the majority. The domination of better genetic traits, and the destruction of inferior traits, led to a better England, according to Unz and his reference, Gregory Clark. He writes: </span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Clark discovered evidence that for centuries the wealthier British had left significantly more surviving children than their poorer compatriots, thus leading their descendents to constitute an ever larger share of each generation. Presumably, this was because they could afford to marry at a younger age, and their superior nutritional and living arrangements reduced mortality rates for themselves and their families. Indeed, the near-Malthusian poverty of much ordinary English life during this era meant that the impoverished lower classes often failed even to reproduce themselves over time, gradually being replaced by the downwardly mobile children of their financial betters. Since personal economic achievement was probably in part due to traits such as diligence, prudence, and productivity, Clark argued that these characteristics steadily became more widespread in the British population, laying the human basis for later national economic success.”</span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Unz then goes on to describe Clark’s theory as “a perfectly plausible one.” You can look at all of the way that Unz tries to present himself as balanced, the theme of his article leads to one conclusion: genocide is good. He does not openly say, “we need genocide,” but by attributing China’s success, either to a great or small extent — to the genocides that it has experienced, can only indicate a favor towards genocide and the extermination of peoples as a means to bettering a nation.<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.unz.com/jman/solutions-again/"><span class="s2"> In 2012, Ron Unz published an article</span></a> on his website that advocated for using infanticide, through Planned Parenthood, to exterminate the children of “low IQ” people in the US:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Curbing reproduction of the low IQ individuals—of all races—would be the next important measure after immigration reform. Any sort of forced or coercive forms should be completely off the table. However, as mentioned before, an outright eugenics program, even if based on voluntary sterilization with incentives, is highly unlikely to fly. There are some workarounds, however: Planned Parenthood (which was founded by a eugenicist): It exists as a type of under-the-radar eugenics program. Planned Parenthood centers could be built and heavily marketed in low-income areas, with heavy availability and marketing of long-term contraceptive measures, such as Norplant. Long-term, fool-proof measures are preferred, because low-IQ women can’t necessarily be depended upon to take birth control pills or use condoms regularly.”<span class="Apple-converted-space">   </span></span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Following the ideology of Silicon Valley elites like Peter Thiel and Ben Horowitz, the article then goes on to promote “Genetic engineering” and says that “Much talk is made about the possibility of parents tailoring their children to suit their own desires, most easily through embryo selection.” He then describes embryo selection and genetic engineering as “valid, concrete solutions to the demographic problems we face.” </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Another article was published on Ron Unz’s website, written by Charles Wood and entitled: <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.unz.com/article/new-prospects-for-eugenics/?highlight=eugenics"><span class="s2">“New Prospects for Eugenics.”</span></a> It is filled with the sick fantasies of Social Darwinists, of banks that that the elites can go to where they can get frozen embryos to have implanted in a womb:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“The next logical step would be to establish a bank of demi-embryos, that is, frozen embryos that were identical twins of highly capable people who had already been born–some may be adults or even deceased. A childless couple could conceivably meet and directly evaluate the person whose identical twin they were considering for implantation. Most people have a strong desire to be the parents of their own genetic offspring. Choosing to implant a demi-embryo might be more attractive if it were the twin of a particularly capable relative. Implanting identical twins may seem futuristic and disconcerting, but if such options were available, some people would certainly use them. … At present, low birth rates among the most capable mean there is a tremendous waste of good germinal material. What we take for granted and discard today could become an extremely valuable commodity in the next century. Future generations could benefit greatly from sperm and egg donations from the brightest and fittest, and augment these advantages with artificial twinning and trans-generational cryoconservation. It remains to be seen whether our species has the wisdom and foresight even to think in these terms.”</span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">The only thing that will bring the world to the awareness of the reality of evil in its purest form, how it functions, how it deceives and propagates, is Catholic consciousness. Not Right-wing thinking, or Left-wing thinking, but pure Catholicism. And by Catholicism I am not speaking of the vague emotionalism or callous indifferentism found so much in the nominal Catholic world;<span class="Apple-converted-space">  </span>nor the anti-intellectualism found amongst the more hard Right traditionalist circles, where you will find many sympathizers towards German and Japanese nationalism, or Germanophiles, and sentiments in favor for Fascism. I am speaking of those beautiful teachings one will find in the medieval writings, or the Catholic works of the Renaissance or the Baroque era, or even the impactful words of great modern popes like Pope Pius XII. It is in these works that one will find the most valiant, the most pure and valorous expressions of the Christian Faith. It is in these works that one will find the drive to an incarnational zeal, bringing the energies towards good into a reality, in action against the forces of evil. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">It is in the Catholic theology that one finds the balance between justice and mercy. When one sees these Rightest types saying “KILL ALL MUSLIMS” or “DO NOT ALLOW A SINGLE MEXICAN INTO THE COUNTRY,” through the lens of an unbalanced theology, in conjunction with an overly enthusiastic pull towards national pride, he will think there is nothing wrong with this. But through the prism of an equilibrium between justice and mercy, one will suspect that there is evil in such words. And after looking into it, one will find that such suspicions were correct.<span class="Apple-converted-space">     </span></span></p>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war For The First Time In American History, Scientists Are Editing The Genetics Of Human Embryos And Then Slaughtering The Unborn Babies. This Is Only Going To Lead To The Era Of The Antichrist And The Mass Genocide Of Countless Human Beings

For the first known time in US history, scientists have now experimented on human embryos to edit their DNA. Nothing came out of the ex...

Read More...»

If Pope Francis Suppresses The Latin Mass He Will Have Made Himself A Tool Of The Antichrist

<p style="text-align: center"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/gsfrer.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-113071" height="186" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/gsfrer-300x186.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/gsfrer-300x186.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/gsfrer-768x477.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/gsfrer-1024x635.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/gsfrer.jpg 1083w" width="300" /></a></p><p>In order for the Antichrist to ascend to power, he has to remove the major obstacles which stand in his path. Those who focus first on politics or economics will be oblivious to his rise and may even find themselves supporting him unwittingly. Politics and economy are not obstacles to him because as sacred scripture notes, the world is already in the clutches of the evil one as God has given him license to for a short time before his ultimate destruction. He does not need to get control over what he already has been allowed to and already does have control over. If he who can offer Christ, God incarnate, all of the riches of the earth and the power therein as part of a simple test in the desert, then certainly the same and more can be offered to any mere man.</p><p>If riches and power are not the obstacle to him, then the object which he has to remove therefore must be spiritual. Specifically, it will be to remove that object or objects which provide the means through which with man's help the grace of God flows into the world. The grace of God can be likened to a water supply and a home which the water is used in to the world, and the pipe through which the water flows as the conduits of this grace. If the antichrist, who wants to bring about the destruction of the human race by, say for this example, setting fire to the house of humanity, he needs to prevent the house from having any means to put out the fire, which in life is the grace of God and in the example is the water, and as such he will attempt to turn off the pipes so that when he goes to burn the house down there will be no means of stopping the fire once it is started.</p><p>Now the grace of God is limitless and the ways which He can transmit that grace to the human race equally limitless. However, certain means are more effective than others because God has designated them as His chosen means. For example, it is clear that Christ did not have to suffer and die on the cross for the sins of man- this is obvious. However, He chose to because this was part of His plan and it was through that means that He brought reconciliation to the human race. In the same way, God has certain means of transmitting his grace more quickly and effectively than others because they were chosen by Him. As the Catholic Encyclopedia notes,</p><blockquote><p>Almighty God can and does give grace to men in answer to their internal aspirations and prayers without the use of any external sign or ceremony. This will always be possible, because God, grace, and the soul are spiritual beings. God is not restricted to the use of material, visible symbols in dealing with men; the sacraments are not necessary in the sense that they could not have been dispensed with. But, if it is known that God has appointed external, visible ceremonies as the means by which certain graces are to be conferred on men, then in order to obtain those graces it will be necessary for men to make use of those Divinely appointed means. This truth theologians express by saying that the sacraments are necessary, not absolutely but only hypothetically, i.e., in the supposition that if we wish to obtain a certain supernatural end we must use the supernatural means appointed for obtaining that end.</p></blockquote><p>This is not to place a limitation on God, but to rather identify that contrary to popular contemporary sentiments which view the transmission of God's grace in an almost entirely individualistic way with no set parameters, the Church has always taught that God gives many means for dispensing grace, but it is all done in an orderly fashion with certain means being able to lead men to grace quicker than other and certain ones being able to transmit more grace than others.</p><p style="text-align: center"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/220px-Highway_401.png"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-113049" height="293" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/220px-Highway_401.png" width="220" /></a></p><p>A highway running in an orderly fashion, sorted by different types of access. Just as the DOT (theoretically) tries to order the flow of traffic so to maximize efficiency and promote the largest number of people getting safely to their destination, God has provided men with the road maps that lead to His grace and ultimately, will lead man home if he follows them. Certain roads get a man to God's destination faster than others.</p><p>There are many recognized, public conduits of God's grace, such as the Sacraments of the Church. These are visible signs of God's grace and mercy and means by which He transmits His grace to us such as Baptism, Marriage, and the Holy Eucharist. However, as the Church has always said, the greatest conduit of grace is the Holy Mass because:</p><blockquote><p>...as Christians we venerate in the bloody sacrifice of the Cross the one, universal, absolute Sacrifice for the salvation of the world. And this indeed is true in a double sense first, because among all the sacrifices of the past and future the Sacrifice on the Cross alone stands without any relation to, and absolutely independent of, any other sacrifice, a complete totality and unity in itself; second because every grace, means of grace and sacrifice, whether belonging to the Jewish, Christian or pagan economy, derive their whole undivided strength, value, and efficiency singly and alone from this absolute sacrifice on the Cross. The first consideration implies that all the sacrifices of the Old Testament, as well as the Sacrifice of the Mass. (source)</p></blockquote><p>Since the sacrifice on the Cross was what reconciled man with God and appeased the just wrath of God, as the mass is the greatest conduit of God's grace that He has given to us.</p><p><span class="embed-youtube" style="text-align:center; display: block;"><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/3eb0R-edS3Y?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe></span></p><p style="text-align: center">A detailed explanation, part-by-part, of the Mass and what happens.</p><p>The great Catholic saint and mystic of the 20th century, St. Pio of Petrelcina, noted the importance of the mass. He said that as the mass is the sacrifice through which God's grace is made most abundant to man, it is more important that the mass is said than even should the sun be extinguished:</p><blockquote><p>"Every holy Mass, heard with devotion, produces in our souls marvelous effects, abundant spiritual and material graces which we, ourselves, do not know. It is easier for the earth to exist without the sun than without the holy Sacrifice of the Mass."</p></blockquote><p style="text-align: center">and</p><blockquote><p>"If we only knew how God regards this Sacrifice, we would risk our lives to be present at a single Mass."</p></blockquote><p>Great saints throughout the ages have echoed the same:</p><blockquote><p>"When Mass is being celebrated, the sanctuary is filled with countless angels who adore the divine victim immolated on the altar." - St. John Chrysostom</p><p>"The angels surround and help the priest when he is celebrating Mass." - St. Augustine</p><p>"The heavens open and multitudes of angels come to assist in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass." - St. Gregory</p><p>"If we really understood the Mass, we would die of joy." - St. John Vianney</p></blockquote><p>Since the mass is the greatest means of communicating God's grace to the world, then one of the prime targets of the wrath of the antichrist before he comes will be the destruction of the mass, as it is the main conduit of the water of God's grace. This destruction can take place by one of two means.</p><p style="text-align: center"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/15361335_7.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-113064" height="169" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/15361335_7-300x169.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/15361335_7-300x169.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/15361335_7.jpg 681w" width="300" /></a></p><p style="text-align: center">Muslims burning an effigy of Pope Benedict XVI after his <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://w2.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/speeches/2006/september/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20060912_university-regensburg.html">Regensburg address</a>.</p><p style="text-align: center">But it is not just Muslims. Many Hindus, Jews, atheists, and governments have been throughout history and still are equally vicious persecutors of the Church. Some of them are honest enough, at least in private, to admit they do not even care for reason, but simply hate the Church because they hate Christ. In the words of the infamous American pornographer <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Goldstein">Al Goldstein</a>, "<em>The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don't believe in authoritarianism." Ford then asked, "What does it mean to you to be a Jew?" To which Goldstein responded, "It doesn't mean sh*t. It means that I'm called a kike." Ford also asked, "Do you believe in God?" Goldstein said, "I believe in me. I'm God. F*ck God. God is your need to believe in some super being. I am the super being. I am your God, admit it. We're random. We're the flea on the ass of the dog."</em> (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Goldstein">source</a>)</p><p>First, the mass can be stopped by being abolished from without. This comes in the forms of persecution, apostasy, anti-clericalism, the LGBT, the rise of demon worship, false beliefs and hatred of Christ and His Church that populate the world. The rise of paganism and the persecutions of the Muslims which are happening around the world in every country are examples of external persecution that are building up and make no secret of their intense hatred of the Catholic Faith and all it is for. Just as in the past and even in many nations today, they will begin persecutions except using their positions of power and influence in the world as well as their technological wares, they will be able to effect greater persecution over larger numbers of people more quickly than before.</p><p>This also include heresy too. It does not matter that man styles himself a "Christian" but continues to persist in an erroneous sect because that is the essence of heresy from it Greek root literally means " a choice":</p><blockquote><p>The term heresy connotes, etymologically, both a choice and the thing chosen, the meaning being, however, narrowed to the selection of religious or political doctrines, adhesion to parties in Church or State. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07256b.htm">source</a>)</p></blockquote><p style="text-align: center"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/anti-catholic-poster-2.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-113063" height="191" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/anti-catholic-poster-2-300x191.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/anti-catholic-poster-2-300x191.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/anti-catholic-poster-2.jpg 516w" width="300" /></a></p><p style="text-align: center">Protestant heretics in their natural and subversive state. As we have noted, heresy is a form of rejection that cannot be separated from subversion. There is no worse crime that a man can commit by blatant, unrepentant heresy, since it is to reject saving truth and lead others into perdition. It is for this reason that notorious heretics were justly executed for centuries by legitimate authorities.</p><p>According to the classical Christian definition of heresy, it is choosing another teaching instead of following that which is taught as truth because one does not like it. St. Paul warned in both <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Timothy%206">1 Timothy</a> and 2 Timothy to stand firm against all false teachings:</p><blockquote><p>I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long suffering and doctrine. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry. (2 Timothy 4:1-5)</p></blockquote><p>Jesus had even harder words on heresy from John 6. This was when after clearly explaining multiple times to the Jews that He had to give His flesh as true food to eat (which is the fulfillment of the grain offering of Daniel 9 that the Antichrist will stop as we explained above), they did not want to hear what he had to say:</p><blockquote><p>Then the Jews began to complain about him because he said, “I am the bread that came down from heaven.” They were saying, “Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How can he now say, ‘I have come down from heaven’?” Jesus answered them, “Do not complain among yourselves. No one can come to me unless drawn by the Father who sent me; and I will raise that person up on the last day. It is written in the prophets, ‘And they shall all be taught by God.’ Everyone who has heard and learned from the Father comes to me. Not that anyone has seen the Father except the one who is from God; he has seen the Father. Very truly, I tell you, whoever believes has eternal life. I am the bread of life. Your ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died. This is the bread that comes down from heaven, so that one may eat of it and not die. I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats of this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.”</p><p>The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” So Jesus said to them, “Very truly, I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood have eternal life, and I will raise them up on the last day; for my flesh is true food and my blood is true drink. Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood abide in me, and I in them. Just as the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so whoever eats me will live because of me. This is the bread that came down from heaven, not like that which your ancestors ate, and they died. But the one who eats this bread will live forever.” He said these things while he was teaching in the synagogue at Capernaum.</p><p>When many of his disciples heard it, they said, “This teaching is difficult; who can accept it?” But Jesus, being aware that his disciples were complaining about it, said to them, “Does this offend you? Then what if you were to see the Son of Man ascending to where he was before? It is the spirit that gives life; the flesh is useless. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life. But among you there are some who do not believe.” For Jesus knew from the first who were the ones that did not believe, and who was the one that would betray him. And he said, “For this reason I have told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted by the Father.”</p><p>Because of this many of his disciples turned back and no longer went about with him. So Jesus asked the twelve, “Do you also wish to go away?” Simon Peter answered him, “Lord, to whom can we go? You have the words of eternal life." - John 6:41-68</p></blockquote><p>In other words, Jesus told his own disciples that they can buzz off if they don't want to accept His teachings, or if they want to claim they accept Him yet persistently refuse to acknowledge clearly revealed truth. This is the reason why Our Lord again makes explicitly clear in Sacred Scripture:</p><blockquote><p>“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven. On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many deeds of power in your name?’ Then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; go away from me, you evildoers.’- Matthew 7:21-23</p></blockquote><p>Heresy has already infected the entire world and has caused and is causing much damage in undermining the work of the Church. It could not be a better cover, for while men think they are doing the will of the Lord they are nothing but tools of the antichrist because all of them lead people away from the truth. It is irrelevant what their intentions are, because intention does not matter- action is what counts. it does not matter that Adam did not intend to sin as he did- the fact is that he did.</p><p style="text-align: center"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/adam-eve-by-tintoretto.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-113065" height="206" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/adam-eve-by-tintoretto-300x206.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/adam-eve-by-tintoretto-300x206.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/adam-eve-by-tintoretto-768x527.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/adam-eve-by-tintoretto.jpg 831w" width="300" /></a></p><p style="text-align: center">Adam and Eve.</p><p style="text-align: center">Action matters. Not intentions.</p><p>Second, the mass can be stopped by stripping it of its power from within. This is the more insidious evil because as opposed to assault from external forces, it has to come by traitors in the ranks of the Catholic "faithful" themselves, either by people who ignore the requirements for a valid mass or from men who illegally say the formula has changed so to give the appearance of a valid mass when it is not.</p><p><span class="embed-youtube" style="text-align:center; display: block;"><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/fgKweu0ZWVs?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe></span></p><p style="text-align: center">A "clown mass." There are many heretical priests who partake of these "things," which are blasphemous farces. These "masses" are neither valid nor have any good to them, but are a sign of the decrepit state which the Church is facing today.</p><p>Catholic.com has an excellent <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/invalid-masses">article </a>about the validity of a mass, and it identifies three points that must be present, for if any one of them is missing, the mass is not valid:</p><p>-Right intention. This means the priest has to actually intend to say the mass and consecrate the Eucharist. While a priest is supposed to believe that Eucharist is the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Christ because it is, over 60% of American Catholics do not believe this. I cannot speak for priests, but if the state of the people is any indication, then it is likely there are many priests who do not believe and likewise do not intend to consecrate at mass. This speaks to the reason why it is very important that when going to mass that one finds a priest who is reverent and cares for the sacredness of his office. This is not so much a problem with priests who celebrate the Latin mass or who are members of the SSPX, but can be an issue with priests who celebrate the contemporary for of the mass that has been used since the 1960s, called the Novus Ordo.</p><p>Because this matter deals with individual temperaments, it is less of an issue that one would need to corrupt in an institutional sense. The best way to remedy this problem is to find a faithful priest.</p><p>-Correct matter. This means using the proper bread and wine during mass, not Welch's 100% Grape Juice in little plastic cups and Wonder Bread cubes that are thrown into the garbage like cocktail hors d'ouvres after "services." If this is taking place, then its clear the priest doesn't believe, and goes back to the first issue. This is an individual consideration, not an institutional one.</p><p>-Proper form. This means celebrating the mass in its proper order. This is where the corruption can take place because one can invalidate the consecration of the Eucharist as well as the entire sacrifice by using an improper form, either by direct choice or by deception into thinking that a valid mass is being celebrated when it really is not.</p><p>Now this might seem as an "obsession" about the mass, but it is an obsession worth obsessing over, because it is at the mass that Christ instituted at the last supper that the Eucharist becomes Christ- body, blood, soul and divinity. The reason for the mass is the Eucharist, and without a valid mass there is no valid Eucharist. To deny the Eucharist is to spiritually starve oneself to spiritual death. Therefore, the question of validity is a matter of life and death to a Christian.</p><p style="text-align: center"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/eucharist.jpeg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-113072" height="190" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/eucharist.jpeg" width="265" /></a></p><p style="text-align: center">The reason for mass.</p><p>As I alluded to above, there has been a TREMENDOUS amount of controversy since Vatican Council II in the 1960s about the validity of the mass. This would seem to be merely an internal conflict, but its strikes to the heart of the Church because without the Mass, there is no Christ, and if that is the case, the mass is no different than just a guy preaching with some music playing. In other words, it is the difference between the Catholic Faith and all heresies throughout Church history, from the Nicolaitans to the Protestants and all in between or who may come after. But more than just the difference between truth and heresy, the proper form of the mass or not is the difference between either severely reducing or shutting off the flow of God's grace to the world.</p><p>Make no mistake, it is error to say that the current form of most Catholic masses, called the Novus Ordo (N.O.) is invalid, because it clearly most are since they meet the three requirements listed above. The problem with the Novus Ordo is that it is a stripped down version of the Latin Mass that is susceptible to error, misinterpretation, and ultimately provides for a reduced flow of God's grace in a way that Latin mass is not. Dr. Peter Kwasiniewski, writing for the Catholic Blog One Peter Five, elaborates on this in an article about the mass, noting how this is the mass which formed countless saints for centuries, was the mass of the Crusaders, and converted countless men to the true Faith, standing as a and often times the only bulwark for centuries amidst social and political turmoil:</p><blockquote><p>If we take a conservative estimate and consider the Roman Mass to have been codified by the reign of Pope St. Gregory the Great (ca. 600) and to have lasted intact until 1970, we are talking about close to 1,400 years of the life of the Church—and that’s most of her history of saints. The prayers, readings, and chants that they heard and pondered will be the ones you hear and ponder.<strong> </strong></p><p>For<em> this</em> is the Mass that St. Gregory the Great inherited, developed, and solidified. This is the Mass that St. Thomas Aquinas celebrated, lovingly wrote about, and contributed to (he composed the Mass Propers and Office for the Feast of Corpus Christi). This is the Mass that St. Louis IX, the crusader king of France, attended three times a day. This is the Mass that St. Philip Neri had to distract himself <em>from</em> before he celebrated it because it so easily sent him into ecstasies that lasted for hours. This is the Mass that was first celebrated on the shores of America by Spanish and French missionaries, such as the North American Martyrs. This is the Mass that priests said secretly in England and Ireland during the dark days of persecution, and this is the Mass that Blessed Miguel Pro risked his life to celebrate before being captured and martyred by the Mexican government. This is the Mass that Blessed John Henry Newman said he would celebrate every waking moment of his life if he could. This is the Mass that the Fr. Frederick Faber called “the most beautiful thing this side of heaven.” This is the Mass that Fr. Damien of Molokai celebrated with leprous hands in the church he had built and painted himself. This is the Mass during which St. Edith Stein, who was later to die in the gas chambers of Auschwitz, became completely enraptured. This is the Mass that great artists such as Evelyn Waugh, David Jones, and Graham Greene loved so much that they lamented its loss with sorrow and alarm. This is the Mass so widely respected that even non-Catholics such as Agatha Christie and Iris Murdoch came to its defense in the 1970s. This is the Mass that St. Padre Pio insisted on celebrating until his death in 1968, <em>after</em> the liturgical apparatchiks had begun to mess with the missal (and this was a man who knew a thing or two about the secrets of sanctity).</p><p>...</p><p>The classical Roman rite has an obvious theocentric and Christocentric orientation, found both in the <em>ad orientem </em>stance of the priest and in the rich texts of the classical Roman Missal itself, which give far greater emphasis to the Mystery of the Most Holy Trinity, the divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ, and the sacrifice of Our Lord upon the Cross.<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://onepeterfive.com/ten-reasons-to-attend-the-traditional-latin-mass/#_edn7" name="_ednref7">[7]</a> As Dr. Lauren Pristas has shown, the prayers of the new Missal are often watered-down in their expression of dogma and ascetical doctrine, whereas the prayers of the old Missal are unambiguously and uncompromisingly Catholic.<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://onepeterfive.com/ten-reasons-to-attend-the-traditional-latin-mass/#_edn8" name="_ednref8">[8]</a> It is the real McCoy, the pure font, not something cobbled together by “experts” for “modern man” and adjusted to his preferences. More and more Catholic pastors and scholars are acknowledging how badly rushed and botched were the liturgical reforms of the 1960s. This has left us with a confusingly messy situation for which the reformed liturgy itself is totally ill-equipped to provide a solution, with its plethora of options, its minimalist rubrics, its vulnerability to manipulative “presiders,” and its manifest discontinuity with at least fourteen centuries of Roman Catholic worship—a discontinuity powerfully displayed in the matter of language, since the old Mass whispers and sings in the Western Church’s holy mother tongue, Latin, while the new Mass has awkwardly mingled itself with the ever-changing vernaculars of the world. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://onepeterfive.com/ten-reasons-to-attend-the-traditional-latin-mass/">source</a>)</p></blockquote><p> </p><p>Any person who has been a Catholic and lived through the transition from the Mass as it was said for centuries until the abrupt post-Vatican II changes will note the massive changes that happened. There has also been a notable, measurable, exponential decline that can be directly correlated with Vatican II.</p><p>In all fairness, it must be noted that there were many problems existing in the Church leading up to Vatican II, and there was a looming decline in the Church. While many people attended, much of it, especially in the United States and Europe, was or was becoming something of cultural practice instead of actual belief. There were many people who were in the churches but did not understand what they believed even in fundamental ways. However, these are not problems uncommon to the Church from history. Indeed, there is likely a not a problem that has not existed among the human race that has not been found in the Church and in the worst possible form. Yet this is the miracle of the Catholic Faith, since the Church is the only institution which has survived since antiquity, seeing the rise and fall of empires, civilizations, and entire peoples, all the while often times being managed in the most inefficient way possible by the most incompetent and unqualified of people and undergoing the worst crises one could conceive of, yet still managing to survive, recover, and grow through and beyond them in ways that no human organization ever could manage to do. It is a testament to the words of Christ is sacred scripture that:</p><blockquote><p>And Jesus answered him, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father in heaven. And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” Then he sternly ordered the disciples not to tell anyone that he was the Messiah. -Matthew 16:17-20</p></blockquote><p>The issue here is not whether the church will survive or not, because God Himself will see to it that She will. The question here is rather that which Jesus Himself asked his disciples:</p><blockquote><p>I tell you, he will quickly grant justice to them. And yet, when the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on earth?” -Luke 18:8</p></blockquote><p style="text-align: center"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/childrenoffatima.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-113068" height="211" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/childrenoffatima-300x211.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/childrenoffatima-300x211.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/childrenoffatima.jpg 593w" width="300" /></a></p><p style="text-align: center">The Three Seers of Fatima- Lucia dos Santos, Francisco Marto, and Jacinta Marto. The Most Holy Virgin revealed to them three secrets, and the revelations, which are officially recognized by the Catholic Church, are regarded formally as some of the most important visions of Our Lady for our times and history.</p><p>The precipitous and really, historic decline of the Catholic Faith that we are seeing take place becomes even more alarming when juxtaposed against the revelations of Fatima, and in particular the Third Secret, of which there is much controversy over because there is a tremendous amount of questions over whether or not it has been completely revealed, to which the growing questions are met with silence from Church authorities.</p><p>As <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/05/03/pope-francis-cites-major-catholic-prophecy-that-god-is-going-to-destroy-the-world-by-fire-from-heaven/">we </a>and many <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.fatima.org/">others </a>have pointed out, those who claim to have seen the Third Secret of Fatima say that it mirrors the message of Our Lady of Akita, which says:</p><blockquote><p>“As I told you, if men do not repent and better themselves, the Father will inflict a terrible punishment on all humanity. It will be a punishment greater than the deluge, such as one will never seen before.<strong> Fire will fall from the sky and will wipe out a great part of humanity, the good as well as the bad, sparing neither priests nor faithful. The survivors will find themselves so desolate that they will envy the dead. </strong>The only arms which will remain for you will be the Rosary and the Sign left by My Son. Each day recite the prayers of the Rosary. With the Rosary, pray for the Pope, the bishops and priests.”</p><p>“The work of the devil will infiltrate even into the Church in such a way that one will see cardinals opposing cardinals, bishops against bishops. The priests who venerate me will be scorned and opposed by their confreres…churches and altars sacked; the Church will be full of those who accept compromises and the demon will press many priests and consecrated souls to leave the service of the Lord.</p><p>“The demon will be especially implacable against souls consecrated to God. The thought of the loss of so many souls is the cause of my sadness. If sins increase in number and gravity, there will be no longer pardon for them” (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ewtn.com/library/mary/akita.htm">source</a>)</p></blockquote><p><strong>However, there may be even more that is not being said. </strong>In an article from the Catholic Traditionalist website One Peter Five, noting that part of the message involves a "bad council" and a "bad mass":</p><blockquote><p><strong>Today, on the Feast of Pentecost</strong>, I called <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gloria.tv/?media=3070" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Fr. Ingo Dollinger</a>, a German priest and <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.kathpedia.com/index.php?title=Ingo_Dollinger" target="_blank" rel="noopener">former professor of theology in Brasil</a>, who is now quite elderly and physically weak. He has been a personal friend of Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI for many years. Father Dollinger unexpectedly confirmed over the phone the following facts:</p><p><strong>Not long after the June 2000 publication of the Third Secret of Fatima by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger told Fr. Dollinger during an in-person conversation that there is still a part of the Third Secret that they have not published! “There is more than what we published,” Ratzinger said. He also told Dollinger that the published part of the Secret is authentic and that the unpublished part of the Secret speaks about “a bad council and a bad Mass” that was to come in the near future.</strong></p><p>Father Dollinger gave me permission to publish these facts on this High Feast of the Holy Ghost and he gave me his blessing. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://onepeterfive.com/cardinal-ratzinger-not-published-whole-third-secret-fatima/">source</a>)</p></blockquote><p>It is of note that Sr. Lucia dos Santos, one of the Fatima visionaries, explicitly stated that the Third Secret was to be revealed publicly <strong>no later than 1960</strong>, especially considering that Vatican II happened a mere two years later:</p><blockquote><p>It was under the direct order of her bishop and, with the assistance of Our Lady, that Sister Lucy dos Santos wrote the third part of the Secret down on January 2, 1944. Speaking to Sister Lucy, the Queen of Heaven told her that it was God’s Will that she commit the Secret to paper and entrust it to her bishop and, through him, to Pope Pius XII. At that time, the Blessed Virgin also indicated that this part of the Secret was to be revealed to the Faithful no later than 1960.</p><p>Upon learning that her bishop was unwilling to open the envelope containing the Secret, Sister Lucy "made him promise," in the words of Canon Galamba, "that the Third Secret would be opened and read to the world upon her death or in 1960, whichever would happen first." If her bishop died first, it was agreed that the Secret would be confided to the Cardinal Patriarch of Lisbon. Despite this agreement, the Secret was, in fact, delivered to the Vatican where it has remained undisclosed to the public for over fifty years.</p><p>Since 1960 when, after reading the Secret, Pope John XXIII decided not to reveal the contents publicly, there has been growing speculation concerning what it contains. While in the past, speculation often identified the Secret with all sorts of cataclysms and disasters, more recent scholarship has indicated that it most likely concerns the widespread chaos, confusion and loss of faith that has gripped the Roman Catholic Church over the last three and a half decades. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.fatima.org/essentials/facts/secret.asp">source</a>)</p></blockquote><p>Again, I emphasize that <span style="text-decoration: underline">I am not saying the Novus Ordo mass is in itself invalid</span>. What I am stating is that there is a body of evidence which strongly indicate the decline of the Faith and increasing abuses of the Faith from within the Church is tied to the changes made at Vatican II that have been warned about by numerous people and per the Fatima messages are also <em>including from God Himself</em>.</p><p>Since Vatican II, the common understanding was that the "old mass" (as some called it) was banned, and this view was promoted by many bishops, who took extraordinary measures to insure the traditional mass was not said. However, some priests insisted it was not, noting that it was never banned and that it could not be banned based on Catholic Tradition itself. Such was the impetus for the formation of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://sspx.org/en">Society of St. Pius X (SSPX)</a> who continued to say the traditional mass (and are not to be confused with the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.sspv.org/">Society of St. Pius V (SSPV)</a>, who are <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://archives.sspx.org/miscellaneous/sedevacantism/little_catechism_on_sedevacantism.htm">sedevacantist </a>heretics) on the basis of this argument, maintaining they were neither heretics nor schismatics, but simply continuing in the tradition of the Church as it always was.</p><p>In 2007, a long needed clarification came from Pope Benedict XVI, who said, echoing the position of the SSPX and in direct opposition to those who said the "old mass" was banned, said that both forms of the mass were permitted:</p><blockquote><p>In the first place, there is the fear that the document detracts from the authority of the Second Vatican Council, one of whose essential decisions – the liturgical reform – is being called into question.</p><p>This fear is unfounded.  In this regard, it must first be said that the Missal published by Paul VI and then republished in two subsequent editions by John Paul II, obviously is and continues to be the normal Form – the <i>Forma ordinaria</i> – of the Eucharistic Liturgy.  The last version of the <i>Missale Romanum</i> prior to the Council, which was published with the authority of Pope John XXIII in 1962 and used during the Council, will now be able to be used as a <i>Forma extraordinaria</i> of the liturgical celebration.  It is not appropriate to speak of these two versions of the Roman Missal as if they were “two Rites”.  Rather, it is a matter of a twofold use of one and the same rite.</p><p>As for the use of the 1962 Missal as a <i>Forma extraordinaria</i> of the liturgy of the Mass, I would like to draw attention to the fact that this Missal was never juridically abrogated and, consequently, in principle, was always permitted.  At the time of the introduction of the new Missal, it did not seem necessary to issue specific norms for the possible use of the earlier Missal.  Probably it was thought that it would be a matter of a few individual cases which would be resolved, case by case, on the local level.  Afterwards, however, it soon became apparent that a good number of people remained strongly attached to this usage of the Roman Rite, which had been familiar to them from childhood.  This was especially the case in countries where the liturgical movement had provided many people with a notable liturgical formation and a deep, personal familiarity with the earlier Form of the liturgical celebration.  We all know that, in the movement led by Archbishop Lefebvre, fidelity to the old Missal became an external mark of identity; the reasons for the break which arose over this, however, were at a deeper level. Many people who clearly accepted the binding character of the Second Vatican Council, and were faithful to the Pope and the Bishops, nonetheless also desired to recover the form of the sacred liturgy that was dear to them.</p><p>There is no contradiction between the two editions of the Roman Missal.  In the history of the liturgy there is growth and progress, but no rupture.  What earlier generations held as sacred, remains sacred and great for us too, and it cannot be all of a sudden entirely forbidden or even considered harmful.  It behooves all of us to preserve the riches which have developed in the Church’s faith and prayer, and to give them their proper place.  Needless to say, in order to experience full communion, the priests of the communities adhering to the former usage cannot, as a matter of principle, exclude celebrating according to the new books.  The total exclusion of the new rite would not in fact be consistent with the recognition of its value and holiness. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://w2.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/letters/2007/documents/hf_ben-xvi_let_20070707_lettera-vescovi.html">source</a>)</p></blockquote><p>In the following decade since this clarification, there has been a tremendous growth in the popularity and prevalence of the Latin mass worldwide as well as within the SSPX. However, there is talk coming from the Vatican that Pope Francis and his associates are directly looking at attempting to reverse the work done by Pope Benedict, possibly going so far as to expressly (and illegally) forbid the saying of the Latin mass:</p><blockquote><p>Sources inside the Vatican suggest that Pope Francis aims to end Pope Benedict XVI’s universal permission for priests to say the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM), also known as the Extraordinary Form of the Mass. While the course of action would be in tune with Pope Francis’ repeatedly expressed disdain for the TLM especially among young people, there has been no open discussion of it to date.</p><p>Sources in Rome told LifeSite last week that liberal prelates inside the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith were overheard discussing a plan ascribed to the Pope to do away with Pope Benedict’s famous document that gave priests freedom to offer the ancient rite of the Mass.</p><p>...</p><p>The overheard plans are nearly identical to comments from an important Italian liturgist in an interview published by France’s <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.la-croix.com/Religion/Catholicisme/Pape/Le-pape-Francois-reflechit-lavenir-motu-proprio-2017-07-07-1200861116">La Croix</a> earlier this month. Andrea Grillo a lay professor at the Pontifical Athenaeum of St Anselmo in Rome, billed by La Croix as “close to the Pope,” is intimately familiar <em>Summorum Pontificum</em>. Grillo in fact published a book against <em>Summorum Pontificum </em>before the papal document was even released.</p><p>Grillo told La Croix that Francis is considering abolishing <em>Summorum Pontificum</em>. According to Grillo, once the Vatican erects the Society of Saint Pius X as a Personal Prelature, the Roman Rite will be preserved only within this structure. "But [Francis] will not do this as long as Benedict XVI is alive.”</p><p>The plan, as related to LifeSite, involved making an agreement with the Society of St. Pius X and, with that agreement in place, sequestering those Catholics wanting the TLM to the SSPX. For most, that would strip them of access to the TLM since there would not be nearly enough SSPX priests to service Catholics wanting the TLM worldwide.</p><p>Moreover, LifeSite’s source suggested that the plan may explain a May 20, 2017 letter by the recently ousted Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith, Cardinal Gerhard Müller. Even though Cardinal Müller wanted the SSPX fully reconciled to help <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vatican-cardinal-enlists-the-help-of-sspx-to-fight-the-modernists">fight modernists in the Church</a>, the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/fetzen-fliegen/item/3266-cardinal-mueller-s-letter-to-bishop-fellay">May 20 letter</a> seemed to scuttle an agreement between Pope Francis and the SSPX which would see them get a personal prelature. The letter includes provisions long known to be completely unacceptable to the SSPX, thus nullifying an understanding SSPX leader Bishop Bernard Fellay believed was imminent.</p><p>The LifeSite source suggested that the May 20 letter by Muller perhaps was written because he knows what Francis was up to and wanted to avoid the plan to bury Summorum Pontificum with Pope Benedict. “It’s directed not so much against Fellay but against the agreement,” said the source. “Pope Francis was very angry that document came out from Cardinal Muller and some say that’s why he made the decision to dismiss him.” (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vatican-rumblings-pope-francis-aiming-to-end-latin-mass-permission">source</a>)</p></blockquote><p>At the same time this is happening, there is an active move under way lead by Pope Francis himself and his colleagues to bring about a shared Eucharist with the Lutherans:</p><blockquote><p>Pope Francis and the global Lutheran leader have jointly pledged to remove the obstacles to full unity between their Churches, leading eventually to shared Eucharist.</p><p>They made the commitment in a joint statement signed before a congregation of Catholic and Lutheran leaders at the conclusion of a joint service in Lund, Sweden, to commemorate the 500th anniversary of the start of the Reformation.</p><p>The statement was signed by Pope Francis and Bishop Munib Younan, who is president of the Lutheran World Federation (LWF), which was founded in Lund in 1947. After they finished signing, the congregation stood for a long round of applause as the two leaders hugged each other.</p><p>The two leaders appeared to single out married couples where one partner is Catholic and the other Lutheran. “Many members of our communities yearn to receive the Eucharist at one table, as the concrete expression of full unity,” they noted.</p><p>“We experience the pain of those who share their whole lives, but cannot share God’s redeeming presence at the Eucharistic table,” they said, adding: “We acknowledge our joint pastoral responsibility to respond to the spiritual thirst and hunger of our people to be one in Christ.”</p><p>“We long for this wound in the Body of Christ to be healed,” they continued. “This is the goal of our ecumenical endeavors, which we wish to advance, also by renewing our commitment to theological dialogue.”</p><p>In their statement, the leaders acknowledged that “Lutherans and Catholics have wounded the visible unity of the Church.”</p><p>“Theological differences were accompanied by prejudice and conflicts, and religion was instrumentalized for political ends,” they said, adding later: “Today, we hear God’s command to set aside all conflict. We recognize that we are freed by grace to move towards the communion to which God continually calls us.”</p><p>As well as pledging to work towards intercommunion, the leaders prayed that Catholics and Lutherans will be able to witness together to the Gospel of Jesus Christ and work for justice and peace.</p><p>“We urge Lutherans and Catholics to work together to welcome the stranger, to come to the aid of those forced to flee because of war and persecution, and to defend the rights of refugees and those who seek asylum,” they said, adding that their “joint service” must also extend to God’s creation. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://cruxnow.com/papal-visit/2016/10/31/catholic-lutheran-churches-pledge-work-shared-eucharist/">source</a>)</p></blockquote><p>Interfaith relations with the goal of bringing heretics into full conversion and reconciliation with the Catholic Church is imperative. However, as this article notes, this is not about actual reconciliation, but rather an intercommunion- with the Lutherans remaining separate from the Church and still persisting in their current beliefs. This remains consistent with <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2016/10/05/attract-followers-dont-proselytize-says-pope-francis">Francis' stated view that people should not proselytize, i.e. actually convert people, but allow them tor remain along their own paths:</a></p><blockquote><p>It’s fair to ask what kind of Catholic Church we as Evangelicals want to see. At lunch I asked Pope Francis what his heart was for evangelism. He smiled, knowing what was behind my question and comment was, “I’m not interested in converting Evangelicals to Catholicism. I want people to find Jesus in their own community.  There are so many doctrines we will never agree on. Let’s be about showing the love of Jesus.” (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://dispatchesfrombrian.com/2014/07/09/lunch-with-the-pope/">source</a>)</p></blockquote><p>The abundant lack of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/is-pope-francis-deliberately-subverting-papal-teaching-authority">clarification </a>coming from Rome in combination with a consistent pattern of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://onepeterfive.com/with-pope-francis-self-contradiction-is-par-for-the-course/">openly self-contradicting</a>, vague, and <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/full-text-of-dubia-cardinals-letter-asking-pope-for-an-audience-15105/">highly questionable statements</a> and actions coming from Francis and his supporters on many issues make both the intercommunion issue with Protestants and the seeming disdain Francis has for the Latin mass all the more serious. Latin mass or not aside, the simple fact is that the Lutherans or any other Protestant, barring formal readmission to the Catholic Church either as as separate rite (such as the case with the Anglican Communion in the Catholic Church) or by reception into the Roman Rite cannot receive communion because the <strong>Lutherans do not believe that the Eucharist is the body, blood, soul and divinity of Christ and as such do not have a valid mass</strong>. To say that a person who denies the Real Presence in the Eucharist could receive the Bread of Life is either (a) to desecrate the Eucharist and commit open blasphemy or (b) <span style="text-decoration: underline">to formally not consecrate the Eucharist and reduce it to a mere symbol, and thus at the same time invalidate the pass because the consecration of the Eucharist is the essential part of the mass</span><strong>. </strong></p><p>Daniel 9:27 notes that as part of its rise to power,<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2016/01/17/90919/"> the antichrist will stop the grain offering, which is the prefigurement of the Eucharist</a>:</p><blockquote><p>He shall make a strong covenant with many for one week, and for half of the week he shall make sacrifice and offering cease; and in their place[f] shall be an abomination that desolates, until the decreed end is poured out upon the desolator.</p></blockquote><p>Am I saying that Pope Francis is the antichrist? No.</p><p>Am I saying that Pope Francis is directly working to bring about rise of the antichrist? No.</p><p>Am I saying that the Catholic Church is the whore of Babylon? No.</p><p>I am saying that Pope Francis actions toward the Latin mass and intercommunion, in light of Catholic teaching and whether he intends them to or not, may result in the creation of conditions favorable to the rise of the antichrist.</p><p>Right now, the Catholic Church is in poor condition worldwide, caused by a historic apostasy that has been going on for almost 60 years directly following Vatican II and amidst many warning signs that a change would cause disastrous results, particularly concerning the mass. The Church is facing massive persecution from without worldwide, especially in areas that were once considered ancient lands of Christendom. She is also facing massive persecution from within, as due to decades of poor catechesis, bad leadership, and a lack of faith the "faithful" are for the most part a group of baptized pagans declining in number and with a poor understanding of what the Faith teaches (this does not include the 60%+ of "Catholics" worldwide who are Catholic in name only). While the Church will never fail because Christ said she would not, what holds the faithful together is really the graces which flow from the mass and in particular through the Eucharist.</p><p>Again, if a change to the Novus Order mass in its current state is made so to allow for intercommunion with the Lutherans, than barring their clear conversion and acceptance of the Faith the Eucharist will either be illegally permitted to be desecrated or simply not consecrated at all. Both are terrible options, but the latter is the more likely, and would immediately invalidate the mass, as it would stop the "grain offering" for the majority of "masses" said around the world. As far as Catholics who persist in saying the Traditional mass, they would be immediately "ghettoized" as a rejected, scorned minority in the walls of the Church and possibly charged with false claims of heresy for their actions.</p><p>I am not saying this will happen, but neither am I saying it will not. I am saying that the warning signs are clear, present, and under the administration of the current pope, who has made countless dubious statements and refuses to answer simple and legitimate theological questions posed about his stances on matters of faith and morals, there is much to be concerned about.</p><p style="text-align: center"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/85de9666bf79354ce06e85416268dd7f-prayer-cards-prayer-for.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-113070" height="300" sizes="(max-width: 233px) 100vw, 233px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/85de9666bf79354ce06e85416268dd7f-prayer-cards-prayer-for-233x300.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/85de9666bf79354ce06e85416268dd7f-prayer-cards-prayer-for-233x300.jpg 233w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/85de9666bf79354ce06e85416268dd7f-prayer-cards-prayer-for.jpg 400w" width="233" /></a></p><p style="text-align: center">What happens at mass</p><p>Ultimately, the Mass is the big target because through it flow the graces which as the saints say sustain the entire world, and are naturally more important than even the Sun itself. It would not need be entirely extinguished either, but simply suppressed enough over a large enough segment of the world that the supply of grace is cut off to such an extent that, using the example I gave earlier of a water supply, house, and the pipes that bring the water to the house, the water supply flow is so reduced that it cannot stop a fire should one start. As we have been warning, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2016/09/18/the-greatest-persecution-of-christians-is-about-to-happen-the-whole-world-is-being-plunged-into-darkness-the-spirit-of-antichrist-is-taking-over-be-prepared-for-major-persecution/">the greatest persecution of Christians in history is not behind us. It is ahead of us</a>. It will come from the enemies of the Church from without, but also from those apostates within. We have been aggressively warning that <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/07/15/only-homophobes-will-make-it-to-heaven-and-all-non-homophobes-will-end-up-in-hell/">Christians need to prepare themselves now, and if need be to move to safe areas while there is still time.</a></p><p>Keep your eyes on the state of the mass, because if "intercommunion" without conversion is allowed by the Pope in combination with the suppression of the Latin mass, then he will have cut off the flow of the greater part of God's grace to the world as He designed it to flow and will have made himself either by accident or action a tool of the antichrist.</p><p><span class="embed-youtube" style="text-align:center; display: block;"><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/7gPan_INmjE?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe></span></p>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war If Pope Francis Suppresses The Latin Mass He Will Have Made Himself A Tool Of The Antichrist

In order for the Antichrist to ascend to power, he has to remove the major obstacles which stand in his path. Those who focus first on ...

Read More...»