ANONYMOUS - OUR VOICE

Austria Moves Closer to Imposing Lockdown on the Unvaccinated

A doctor who was banned by the General Medical Council from discussing COVID-19 on social media after claiming “masks do nothing” has taken his case to the High Court in London.
The social media ban was a condition imposed on Dr Samuel White’s registration with the GMC after he posted a video to Instagram and Twitter in June.
In the video, White said why he could no longer tolerate working in his previous roles because of the “lies” around the NHS and the government’s response to the pandemic, which were “so vast” he could no longer “stomach” them, the court was told.
The doctor also raised concerns about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine and the reliability of COVID tests while also asserting, “masks do nothing.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true" readability="5.0666666666667">
Dr. Samuel White – conspiracy theory or…. <a href="https://t.co/twTncANbZZ">pic.twitter.com/twTncANbZZ</a>
— Wittgenstein (@Kukicat7) <a href="https://twitter.com/Kukicat7/status/1441499296235405313?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 24, 2021</a>
</blockquote>
“Dr White, a partner at Denmead Practice in Hampshire until his resignation in February, has brought his High Court challenge against the GMC in a bid to quash restrictions imposed on him, which include barring him from sharing his views relating to the pandemic on social media,” reports <a href="https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/11/04/doctor-banned-social-media-masks-do-nothing-row-takes-case-high/?li_source=LI&li_medium=liftigniter-rhr">the Telegraph</a>.
“This is a claim about freedom of expression of a doctor, in particular his freedom to engage in medical, scientific and political debate and discussion,” White’s barrister, Francis Hoar, told a hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice.
Hoar added that White’s opinions were “supported by large bodies of scientific and medical opinion” and had been “statements of fact and opinions about pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions in response to the pandemic.”
The original tribunal that slapped an 18 month ban on White using social media to air his views argued that the doctor was amplifying “conspiracy theories” about the pandemic.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true" readability="7.007874015748">
Why I resigned as a GP Partner
Dr Samuel White <a href="https://t.co/544l4C2nga">pic.twitter.com/544l4C2nga</a>
— ЯΞD PILL LΞD 🔎 (@Red_Pill_Led) <a href="https://twitter.com/Red_Pill_Led/status/1402088740613279745?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 8, 2021</a>
</blockquote>
White faced censure despite other experts agreeing with his take on the futility of face masks.
As we previously highlighted, Dr Colin Axon dismissed face masks as “comfort blankets” that do virtually nothing, noting that the COVID-19 virus particle is up to 5,000 times smaller than the holes in the mask.
“The small sizes are not easily understood but an imperfect analogy would be to imagine marbles fired at builders’ scaffolding, some might hit a pole and rebound, but obviously most will fly through,” Axon said.
Even Dr. Anthony Fauci admitted that masks were pointless at the start of the pandemic, when he wrote that a typical store-bought face mask “is not really effective in keeping out virus, which is small enough to pass through material.”
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter:
———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at <a href="https://www.pjwshop.com/">https://www.pjwshop.com/</a>
<a href="https://www.pjwshop.com/"><img alt="PJW Shop" border="0" height="600" src="https://cdn.summit.news/2021/07/merch.jpg" width="348" /></a>
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter <a href="https://summit.news/newsletter">here</a>.
Support my sponsor – <a href="https://bit.ly/TURBOFORCE">Turbo Force</a> – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on <a href="https://pauljosephwatson.locals.com/">Locals</a>.
———————————————————————————————————————
 
 
source <a href="https://summit.news/2021/11/06/austria-moves-closer-to-imposing-lockdown-on-the-unvaccinated/">https://summit.news/2021/11/06/austria-moves-closer-to-imposing-lockdown-on-the-unvaccinated/</a>

revolution summit Austria Moves Closer to Imposing Lockdown on the Unvaccinated

A doctor who was banned by the General Medical Council from discussing COVID-19 on social media after claiming “masks do nothing” has taken ...

Will Prince Charles Wage War On Mankind As King?

news Will Prince Charles Wage War On Mankind As King?

At the World Leaders Summit of the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26), Prince Charles called for “a vast military-style campa...

Special Assignment: Election Theft?

<div><img class="ff-og-image-inserted" src="https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/special-assignment248124686.jpg" /></div>
 
A <a href="https://www.churchmilitant.com/pdf/PDFIZE.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">statistical analysis</a> provided exclusively to Church Militant on Tuesday demonstrates the unlikeliness of a genuine Donald J. Trump loss last November.
The <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/out-of-bounds" target="_blank">report</a>, called Out of Bounds: Irregularities in the 2020 Presidential Election, claims “the evidence will show that it was statistically improbable — ‘out of bounds’ — that Democrat candidate Joe Biden could’ve won the 2020 presidential election.”
Read the report:
The Big Tech purge is here! Follow <a href="https://www.infowars.com/posts/the-big-tech-crackdown-is-accelerating-follow-infowars-on-these-growing-alternative-platforms/">Infowars and Alex Jones on other growing platforms</a> now to stay informed as the information blackout accelerates.
 
 
source <a href="https://www.infowars.com/posts/special-assignment-election-theft">https://www.infowars.com/posts/special-assignment-election-theft</a>

news Special Assignment: Election Theft?

A statistical analysis provided exclusively to Church Militant on Tuesday demonstrates the unlikeliness of a genuine Donald J. Trump loss...

Treasury Secretary Yellen Admits “Net Zero” Grand Reset Climate Price Tag Will Be $150 TRILLION

For years, the climate change lobby was laser-focused on just one aspect of the “climate change” crusade: the end – which supposedly is some world where the temperatures no longer rise due to fossil fuel emissions (because we now live in a world of global warming as scientists agree, not to be confused with the global cooling hypothesis that <a href="https://www.insidescience.org/news/my-1975-cooling-world-story-doesnt-make-todays-climate-scientists-wrong">emerged in the 1970s</a>, when many were even warning of a new ice age) justifying the means.
Meanwhile the “means”, or the final cost to taxpayers of all that endless, tedious virtual signaling, was almost never touched upon for a reason – as we first explained three weeks ago, the bill for getting the world from point A to that mythical, utopic point B, was so high, it would be double global GDP.
For those who missed it, here is an excerpt of what <a href="https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/here-hidden-150-trillion-agenda-behind-crusade-against-climate-change">we wrote back on October 14</a>, shortly after Bank of America published the definitive compendium on climate change and the coming Net Zero (i.e., great reset) world, and which we discussed in depth:
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote" readability="25">
“while it is handy to have a centralized compendium of the data, a 5 minute google search can provide all the answers that are “accepted” dogma by the green lobby. But while we don’t care about the charts, that cheat sheets, or the propaganda, what we were interested in was the bottom line – how much would this green utopia cost, because if the “net zero”, “ESG”, “green” narrative is pushed so hard 24/7, you know it will cost a lot.
Turns out it does. A lot, lot.
Responding rhetorically to the key question, “how much will it cost?”, BofA cuts to the chase and writes $150 trillion over 30 years – some $5 trillion in annual investments – amounting to twice current global GDP!
</blockquote>
Cutting to the chase, we said that “if it sounds like “the crusade against climate change” is one giant con game meant to enrich a handful of kleptocrats here and now, while the nebulous benefits – and the all too certain debt and hyperinflation – of this revolutionary overhaul of the global economy are inherited by future generations, it’s because that’s precisely what it is.” This was BofA’s startling admission of the above, as excerpted from the report’s Q&A on the Climate Change Conference (COP 26):
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote" readability="12">
Q: What is the economic impact of net zero?  
A: The inflation impact of elevated net zero funding will not be insignificant but the impact looks manageable at 1% to 3% per annum depending on central bank monetization rates, particularly if government spending is targeted and contributes to accelerate the rate of global GDP growth. The IEA also has a productive outlook for their net zero scenario, where the change in the annual growth rate of GDP accelerates by somewhere between 0.3% and 0.5% on a sustained basis over the next 10 years as a result of a shift to a green economy.
</blockquote>
So, much more QE for the next 30 years, check. What about inflation? Oh, there will be plenty of that too. As BofA admits, “green bond purchases could result in a 1% to 3% inflation p.a. shock“
BofA looked at three separate cases. In the first case, the Fed, ECB and other central banks would subsidize all of the required infrastructure spending to decarbonize (translation: print the money). In a second scenario, they would absorb only half of the new bond issuance. And in a third case, central banks take up only a fifth of all decarbonization spending onto their balance sheet. What is the key finding? If central banks only have to foot 20% of the bill or less, the impact of decarbonization looks “fairly manageable” with respect to inflation (Exhibit 108).
And just so readers know what to BofA looks “manageable” here it is: this is inflation on top of whatever inflation is already in the economy. Of course, if central banks have to “foot” 50%, 80%, or more, well… it gets much worse.
<figure class="wp-block-image"><img alt="" src="https://assets.zerohedge.com/s3fs-public/styles/inline_image_mobile/public/inline-images/additional%20inflation_1.jpg?itok=oGrM3QR5" />
<figcaption>(screenshot: Bank of America)</figcaption>
</figure>
To be sure, while having a realistic estimate of just how much this unprecedented global “grand reset” will cost is imperative, establishment politicians can simply say that the numbers are ridiculous, and the cost will never be as high as the staggering BofA estimate of between $100 and $150 trillion.
Unless, of course, one of the most important politicians and officials of the current globalist regime confirms it. Which is precisely what happened this week during the <a href="https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0457">Keynote Remarks from US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen</a>, who was speaking at the COP26 “net zero” climate change conference in Glasgow (or <a href="https://www.zerohedge.com/political/who-going-tell-him-cnns-wolf-blitzer-reports-edinburgh-not-glasgow">Edinburgh if you are CNN</a>). Here are the key excerpts:
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote" readability="18">
Keynote Remarks by Secretary of the Treasury Janet L. Yellen at COP26 in Glasgow, Scotland at the Finance Day Opening Event
Glasgow and COP26 is a pivotal moment at the start of this decisive decade of climate action. The climate crisis is already here.  This is not a challenge for future generations, but one we must confront today.
Rising to this challenge will require the wholesale transformation of our carbon-intensive economies.  It’s a global transition for which we have an estimated price tag: some have put the global figure between $100 and $150 trillion over the next three decades.  At the same time, addressing climate change is the greatest economic opportunity of our time. 
</blockquote>
<figure>[embedded content]</figure>
For now, we are nowhere near: in fact, as Yellen admitted what has been pledged so far is a drop in the provberbial bucket.
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote" readability="9">
Many of the conversations here in Glasgow will rightfully focus on the way we use our public resources to fund climate mitigation and adaptation activities domestically and – for those in a position to do so – to assist other countries in responding to climate change.  I agree we all must do more, and the United States is stepping up.  President Biden has already announced that we are quadrupling our international climate finance for developing countries by 2024 to more than $11 billion.
</blockquote>
It is what is coming next that is terrifying:
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote" readability="12">
And later this afternoon I will be speaking specifically on what we are doing to mobilize climate finance to emerging and developing economies, including our engagement with the multilateral development banks and institutions. I hope you will join me to hear more.
These programs are exciting. But as big as the public sector effort is across all our countries, the $100-trillion plus price tag to address climate change globally is far bigger.
</blockquote>
These numbers are simply staggering, and as Yellen concedes, “The gap between what governments have and what the world needs is large, and the private sector needs to play a bigger role.”
Of course, it is easy to make some arbitrary, non-binding pledge meant purely for optical purposes to reach the funding threshold. It is far more difficult to actually obtain the funds. Case in point: an alliance championed by former central banker and current eco-fanatic, Mark Carney as well as private jet-setting “eco friendly” billionaire Mike Bloomberg, and representing 40% of the world’s financial assets has now pledged to meet the goals set out in the Paris climate agreement
More than 450 firms representing $130 trillion of assets now belong to the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ), almost double the roughly $70 trillion when GFANZ was launched in April, according to a progress report published by the coalition on Wednesday. Signatories must commit to use science-based guidelines to reach net zero carbon emissions by mid-century, and to provide 2030 interim goals. Investment managers accounted for $57tn of the assets, with $63tn coming from banks and $10tn from asset owners such as pension funds. Among the finance groups signed up to Gfanz are HSBC, Bank of America and Santander.
“We now have the essential plumbing in place to move climate change from the fringes to the forefront of finance so that every financial decision takes climate change into account,” said Carney, the former governor of the Bank of England who has been chair of Gfanz since its launch in April.
Alas, as with most things having to do with climate change, this is just another giant, virtue signaling circle-jerk. As even Bloomberg’s own propaganda outlet, <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-11-02/carney-s-climate-alliance-crests-130-trillion-as-pledges-soar?sref=6uww027M">Bloomberg Green</a>, admits despite the huge headline number, “skeptics question the underlying terms of the commitments.” According to French nonprofit Reclaim Finance, none of the sub-alliances that make up GFANZ require signatories to stop financing fossil-fuel expansion. And since the 2015 Paris accord was struck, global banks have funneled $4 trillion into oil, gas and coal, with almost half a trillion of that allocated this year alone, according to Bloomberg data.
In short, this is one big joke, and one doesn’t even need to read the FT’s “explainer” asking “<a href="https://www.ft.com/content/036f6253-ea40-4cde-868a-db8c5f3b245a">Do the maths on Mark Carney’s $130tn net zero pledge stack up</a>?” Instead, we refer readers to what we wrote previously, that – as even BofA admits, the funding need for the global “net zero” grand reset is all about greenlighting the biggest QE episode in history, one which will spark an inflationary inferno, debase the dollar, unleash digital central bank currencies, saddle the world with hundreds of trillions more in unrepayable debt, all the while making the rich far richer than they are now.
We just see a peak of <1% additional inflation a year over a three decade horizon. Under more aggressive scenarios where central banks opt to absorb either half or the full decarbonization bills through quantitative easing, the risks of an inflation shock grow. Still, we think our third case is the most likely scenario, as it would be politically difficult to justify a much more expansive monetary impulse. True, while central bankers have expressed a desire to help green the economy, their corporate bond purchases have historically been restricted to crisis time policies through quantitative easing and remain well below purchases of sovereign debt. As such, any purchases of corporate green bonds would likely be limited both by the size of future purchase programs and their proportion relative to the overall corporate bond market, with slightly higher allocations under more progressive purchase policies that highlight environmental concerns
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote" readability="13">
And there you have it: just as covid was one giant smokescreen to “allow” central banks and Treasuries to merge and lead us to Helicopter Money and MMT, creating some $30 trillion in liquidity in the process, the “Net Zero” myth is what will perpetuate this endless printing for the next 30 years, a period during which the only benefits will be bestowed upon those who benefit from QE and money printing. That would be the richest. As for everyone else, well you great grandchildren or their grandchildren may (or may not) live in a cleaner world. We really don’t know, but if we don’t start printing money now it will be too late.
</blockquote>
If that sounds scarier, more manipulative and far more destructive than any cargo cult in human history, it’s because it is. As for global warming, 30 years from now absolutely nothing about the world’s present course will have changed (after all the bulk of the money will simply be embezzled as always happens when funds enter the public sector, never to be heard from again), but at least central banks will be around to backstop all assets for the next 30 years… You know, for the climate.
As before, the full 114 page report from Bank of America on the true costs of climate change and which we recommend to anyone who wants to know what is truly behind the push for “net zero”, is <a href="https://www.zerohedge.com/premium">available to pro subs.</a>
<hr class="wp-block-separator" />
 
 
source <a href="https://www.infowars.com/posts/treasury-secretary-yellen-admits-net-zero-grand-reset-climate-price-tag-will-be-150-trillion">https://www.infowars.com/posts/treasury-secretary-yellen-admits-net-zero-grand-reset-climate-price-tag-will-be-150-trillion</a>

news Treasury Secretary Yellen Admits “Net Zero” Grand Reset Climate Price Tag Will Be $150 TRILLION

For years, the climate change lobby was laser-focused on just one aspect of the “climate change” crusade: the end – which supposedly is some...

‘Time to Name Names’: Republicans Kick Off Intraparty Inquisition Over Infrastructure Bill Vote

<div><img class="ff-og-image-inserted" src="https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/basedGOPhouse293819467.jpg" /></div>
The House of Representatives passed President Joe Biden’s $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill on Friday, putting an end to a months-long deadlock caused by wrangling between the progressive and fiscally conservative wings of the Democratic Party over just how big the president’s accompanying social and climate spending package will be.
Some GOP lawmakers are baying for the blood of their fellow House Republicans after they joined Democrats to pass the president’s $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill.13 of the 213 House Republicans voted ‘yes’ on the new infrastructure spending, sparking allegations of betrayal and threats of primaries in next year’s midterm election.
Georgia congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene drew up a list of the black sheep Republicans, accusing them of “hand[ing] over their voting cards to [Democratic House Speaker] Nancy Pelosi to pass Joe Biden’s Communist takeover of America via so-called infrastructure.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" readability="7.6109422492401">
These are the 13 “Republicans” who handed over their voting cards to Nancy Pelosi to pass Joe Biden’s Communist takeover of America via so-called infrastructure:
Katko 
Bacon 
Van Drew 
Young 
Upton 
Kinzinger 
Gonzalez (OH) 
Reed 
Smith 
Gabarino 
Malliotakis 
Fitzpatrick 
McKinley
— Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 (@mtgreenee) <a href="https://twitter.com/mtgreenee/status/1456857849984913410?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 6, 2021</a></blockquote>
Greene did not specify which part of the $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill, which includes funds for repairs of America’s roads, bridges, utility networks, airports, railroad and public transport infrastructure, half a million new electric vehicle charges, and light-rail, bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure in major cities, would result in a “Communist takeover”.
Never Trump Republican Adam Kinzinger, one of the congressmen who voted in favour of the bill, shot back, suggesting that equating infrastructure to communism was “a new one” and mocking Greene by suggesting that former Republican President Dwight Eisenhower’s “interstate system should be torn up or else the commies will be able to conveniently drive!”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" readability="4.9756097560976">
Infrastructure=communism is a new one. Eisenhower’s interstate system should be torn up or else the commies will be able to conveniently drive! Red Dawn in real life <a href="https://t.co/WTPtBYDSHx">pic.twitter.com/WTPtBYDSHx</a>
— Adam Kinzinger (@AdamKinzinger) <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamKinzinger/status/1456841741231927297?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 6, 2021</a></blockquote>
“Also I’m assuming that the ‘Republicans’ being in quotes implies that if you don’t believe in Jewish space lasers, and believe in roads, you aren’t a real Republican,” Kinzinger added, referring to Greene’s <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://sputniknews.com/20210130/untreated-schizophrenia-twitter-explodes-over-rep-greenes-jewish-laser-beam-conspiracy-theory-1081927756.html" target="_blank">controversial 2018 tweet</a> claiming that a space-based laser owned by the Rothschild banking clan may have deliberately caused the wildfires wreaking havoc in California at the time.
Florida Republican congressman Matt Gaetz <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://twitter.com/tbailey1976/status/1456842646257745927" target="_blank">echoed</a> Greene’s ideological concerns, tweeting that he couldn’t believe that “Republicans just gave the Democrats their socialism bill.” Arizona Republican congressman Andy Biggs, meanwhile, <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://twitter.com/RepAndyBiggsAZ/status/1456824209875914756" target="_blank">suggested</a> that “Republicans who voted for the Democrats’ socialist spending bill are the very reason why Americans don’t trust Congress.”
Madison Cawthorn, a freshman House Republican from North Carolina, <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://twitter.com/CawthornforNC/status/1456822729412329474" target="_blank">threatened to “primary the hell out of”</a> any members of his party who votes for the bill.
Colorado GOP congresswoman Lauren Boebert <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://twitter.com/laurenboebert/status/1456833964098965504" target="_blank">branded</a> Republicans who crossed the aisle for the vote on infrastructure ‘Republicans in Name Only’, or RINOs, accusing them of helping Pelosi pass “this wasteful $1.2 trillion ‘infrastructure’ bill” and suggesting that the Democrats “did not have the votes” to pass “this garbage” on their own.
“Time to name names and hold these fake republicans accountable,” Boebert demanded.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" readability="8.4461538461538">
RINOS just passed this wasteful $1.2 trillion dollar “infrastructure” bill.
Pelosi did not have the votes in her party to pass this garbage.
Time to name names and hold these fake republicans accountable.
— Lauren Boebert (@laurenboebert) <a href="https://twitter.com/laurenboebert/status/1456833964098965504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 6, 2021</a></blockquote>
Representative Ralph Norman of South Carolina expressed concerns over the debt, tweeting “We’re literally $28 trillion in debt and Democrats can’t understand why we want to see how much this bill is going to cost.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" readability="5.0673575129534">
We're literally $28 trillion in debt and Democrats can't understand why we want to see how much this bill is going to cost.<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NoScoreNoVote?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NoScoreNoVote</a>
— Rep. Ralph Norman (@RepRalphNorman) <a href="https://twitter.com/RepRalphNorman/status/1456626787794948096?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 5, 2021</a></blockquote>
The infrastructure bill <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://sputniknews.com/20211106/us-house-appears-to-gain-backing-for-infrastructure-bbb-rule-after-progressives-teeter-1090510269.html" target="_blank">passed</a> on Friday night 228 to 206, with six Democrats from the party’s progressive wing who sought more spending for the Build Back Better spending package, including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, voting no.
The infrastructure bill now advances to Biden’s desk for final approval. The Senate approved it back in August, voting 69-30, with 19 Republicans voting in favour of the new spending.
The House passed a key procedural vote Saturday morning to line up the passage of the $1.75 trillion Build Back Better Act climate and social spending package, with hopes for its final passage falling apart Friday morning after House moderates announced they would not vote on the spending package until the Congressional Budget Office completes an analysis of its projected long-term impact on the budget deficit. The report is expected to take several days to complete, with the Congress in recess next week.
The BBB agenda includes universal preschool, childcare assistance, four weeks of paid parental, sick and caregiver leave, an expansion of the child tax credit programme, new Medicare assistance, and a whopping $500 billion for climate programmes – chiefly through clean energy tax credits.
The new proposed spending has been praised for its ambitious expansion of the social safety net for tens of millions of Americans, and its plans to accelerate the US’s transition to carbon neutrality. It has also taken heavy flak from fiscal conservatives, however, given its potential to add to America’s <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://sputniknews.com/20211008/build-back-bankrupt-dems-wrangle-over-35-trln-spending-bill-despite-debt-limit-close-call-1089774888.html" target="_blank">already gargantuan national debt</a>, and increase inflation. Democrats have promised that new taxes on the wealthy and corporations would largely cover the spending, with these proposals <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://sputniknews.com/20211024/biden-administration-reportedly-set-to-roll-out-tax-targeting-00002-wealthiest-americans-1090178497.html" target="_blank">viewed with skepticism in some corners</a> given billionaires’ notorious ability to evade paying taxes.
<hr class="wp-block-separator" />
<a href="https://freeworldnews.tv/watch?id=6185cd3db2140737c31adefe" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Crazy Liberals Attempt To Block Senator’s Vehicle For Rejecting Spending Bill</a>
 
 
source <a href="https://www.infowars.com/posts/time-to-name-names-republicans-kick-off-intraparty-inquisition-over-infrastructure-bill-vote">https://www.infowars.com/posts/time-to-name-names-republicans-kick-off-intraparty-inquisition-over-infrastructure-bill-vote</a>

news ‘Time to Name Names’: Republicans Kick Off Intraparty Inquisition Over Infrastructure Bill Vote

The House of Representatives passed President Joe Biden’s $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill on Friday, putting an end to a months-long dead...

8 Dead in Stampede at Astroworld Music Festival in Houston

<div><img class="ff-og-image-inserted" src="https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/astroworld20348916967.jpg" /></div>
Eight people were killed and several more injured in a stampede during a sold-out hip-hop music festival in Houston, Texas, the fire department said.
Ambulances and firefighters were called in after multiple injuries were reported on the opening night of the Astroworld Music Festival.
“We have eight confirmed fatalities at this point,” Houston Fire Chief Samuel Pena told reporters, adding that overall, 23 people were transported from the scene.
“The crowd began to compress toward the front of the stage, and people began to panic,” Pena said.
A video on social media shows paramedics performing CPR on several people who are lying on the ground outside the stage, as loud music continues to play in the background.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" readability="7.544474393531">
⚠️🇺🇸<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/URGENT?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#URGENT</a>: Multiple injuries reported at Astroworld Music Festival in Houston, Texas<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Houston?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Houston</a> l <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/TX?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#TX</a> 
A large medical response is underway at NRG Park for ‘several patients’. Disturbing footage from the scene shows EMS performing CPR on three patients. 
Gathering more details! <a href="https://t.co/5LPUHX7pnz">pic.twitter.com/5LPUHX7pnz</a>
— Intel Point ALERT (@IntelPointAlert) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntelPointAlert/status/1456856889850007553?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 6, 2021</a></blockquote>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" readability="7.2777777777778">
Multiple people have been taken to an area hospital in the Houston, Texas area after sustaining injuries at <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ASTROWORLDFest?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ASTROWORLDFest</a>, according to <a href="https://twitter.com/KHOU?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@KHOU</a>. Video shared on Instagram Stories shows first responders performing life-saving measures on attendees. <a href="https://t.co/oOLH0AU2QU">pic.twitter.com/oOLH0AU2QU</a>
— Malik Earnest (@MalikEarnest) <a href="https://twitter.com/MalikEarnest/status/1456849388949495811?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 6, 2021</a></blockquote>
Security issues were a matter of concern even before the event had begun. Local media reported that multiple people were trampled after hundreds stormed into NRG Stadium, pushing back security barricades.
The Houston Chronicle said some disorderly concertgoers were detained by police at the entrance.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" readability="2.3232323232323">
They smoked VIP <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Astroworld?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Astroworld</a> <a href="https://t.co/AYvjKT8VBY">pic.twitter.com/AYvjKT8VBY</a>
— BMoore (@BrennonMoore34) <a href="https://twitter.com/BrennonMoore34/status/1456705067285950474?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 5, 2021</a></blockquote>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" readability="3.32">
The merch line at Travis Scott’s Astroworld festival 👀<a href="https://t.co/DNXD0ESo8i">pic.twitter.com/DNXD0ESo8i</a>
— XXL Magazine (@XXL) <a href="https://twitter.com/XXL/status/1456704706366087182?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 5, 2021</a></blockquote>
An ABC13 reporter filmed fans breaching the perimeter before the concert began and tearing down metal detectors.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" readability="9.656976744186">
As we were arriving to the Astroworld Festival at NRG Park right at 2:00, a stampede burst through the gates. Hundreds of people destroyed the VIP security entrance, bypassing the checkpoint. People were trampled. Some were detained.
(Excuse any language you may hear) <a href="https://t.co/d0m2rjqAAk">pic.twitter.com/d0m2rjqAAk</a>
— Mycah Hatfield (@MycahABC13) <a href="https://twitter.com/MycahABC13/status/1456704812456845316?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 5, 2021</a></blockquote>
Another video claims to show a group of fans trying to get in by climbing over a fence.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" readability="3.1896551724138">
Astroworld security not playing this year 😭😭 <a href="https://t.co/JTNiPNyXHJ">pic.twitter.com/JTNiPNyXHJ</a>
— costa (@andrrusco) <a href="https://twitter.com/andrrusco/status/1456647899035615234?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 5, 2021</a></blockquote>
ABC13 said the festival’s 100,000 tickets sold out within an hour of going on sale in May. The Houston Chronicle said that around 50,000 fans showed up for the two-day event.
The event’s lineup included hip hop stars Travis Scott, Young Thug, Lil Baby, SZA, and a surprise appearance by Drake, among others.
<hr class="wp-block-separator" />
A caller on “The Chris Plante show” give a great explanation about how she overcame the <a href="https://freeworldnews.tv/watch?id=6185c094b2140737c319c114" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">brainwashing from the left</a>.
 
 
source <a href="https://www.infowars.com/posts/8-dead-in-stampede-at-astroworld-music-festival-in-houston">https://www.infowars.com/posts/8-dead-in-stampede-at-astroworld-music-festival-in-houston</a>

news 8 Dead in Stampede at Astroworld Music Festival in Houston

Eight people were killed and several more injured in a stampede during a sold-out hip-hop music festival in Houston, Texas, the fire depart...