ANONYMOUS - OUR VOICE

FDA Approved ‘First Oral Blood Thinning Medication For Children’ Ahead Of Vaccine Rollout For Ages 5-11

<h4>The Food and Drug Administration approved the “first oral blood thinning medication for children” a few months ahead of their COVID-19 vaccine rollout for children ages 5-11.</h4>
In late June 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) <a href="https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-oral-blood-thinning-medication-children">approved</a> a drug called Pradaxa; oral pellets to treat children 3 months to less than 12 years of age with venous thromboembolism, a condition that involves blood clots forming in the veins. Pradaxa is the “first FDA-approved blood thinning medication that children can take by mouth,” reads the FDA News Release.
“With today’s approval of Pradaxa, pediatric patients have another therapeutic option to treat and prevent potentially deadly blood clots,” said Ann Farrell, M.D., director of the Division of Non-Malignant Hematology for the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
A few months later, the FDA<a href="https://www.npr.org/2021/11/01/1051036145/will-the-cdc-follow-the-fda-and-approve-pfizers-vaccine-for-kids-ages-5-11"> authorized</a> children ages 5-11 to be injected with the Pfizer COVID-19 shot.
Blood clotting has been a somewhat rare but extremely serious and potentially life threatening side effect for all of the controversial COVID-19 vaccines. <a href="https://nationalfile.com/study-jj-vaccine-recipients-3-5x-more-likely-to-develop-potentially-fatal-blood-clot-in-the-brain/">As National File reported</a> this week, a new study headed by a Mayo Clinic doctor suggests that individuals who were injected with the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine are 3.5 times more likely to get Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis, a potentially fatal blood clot in the brain.
Earlier this year, multiple countries across the world <a href="https://apnews.com/article/germany-suspends-astrazeneca-vaccine-blood-clotting-0ab2c4fe13370c96c873e896387eb92f">halted</a> the use of the Astrazeneca COVID-19 injection due to blood clots. Around the same time, a <a href="https://au.news.yahoo.com/shock-finding-covid-vaccine-study-pfizer-astrazeneca-004137574.html">shock study</a> found that the clotting was just as likely to occur from a Pfizer shot.
Australian equestrian star <a href="https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/10/pfizer-vaccine-healthy-equestrian-star-rushed-to-hospital-with-blood-clots-after-jab/">Cienna Knowles</a>, an otherwise healthy individual, received the Pfizer COVID-19 injection and was ultimately hospitalized and said she experienced blood “clots all through my legs, stomach, and through both lungs.”
“The amount of clots on my lungs is equivalent to having broken ribs, so a little painful and hard to breathe. As part of my treatment for my recovery, I am now medicated & never have been in my life. As a result of these, I have internal bleeding and nose bleeds as one of the side effects of my medications along with a line of other things I choose to keep private,” Knowles <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/CVZ5528FSD-/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading">said</a> on Instagram.
<div class="KatJAXOn"><a href="https://www.infowarsstore.com/specials-clearance/this-weeks-sales?ims=wsvpv&utm_campaign=blackfridayhero&utm_source=Infowars+Hero&utm_medium=banner&utm_content=blackfridayhero" target="_blank"><img src="https://api.directus.libertycdn.com/uploads/_/originals/BlackFridatSE-hero-385.jpg" /></a></div>
 
 
source <a href="https://www.infowars.com/posts/fda-approved-first-oral-blood-thinning-medication-for-children-ahead-of-vaccine-rollout-for-ages-5-11">https://www.infowars.com/posts/fda-approved-first-oral-blood-thinning-medication-for-children-ahead-of-vaccine-rollout-for-ages-5-11</a>

news FDA Approved ‘First Oral Blood Thinning Medication For Children’ Ahead Of Vaccine Rollout For Ages 5-11

The Food and Drug Administration approved the “first oral blood thinning medication for children” a few months ahead of their COVID-19 vacci...

SCIENCE HORROR: Vaccine Spike Protein Enters Cell Nuclei, Suppresses DNA Repair Engine – Will Unleash Explosion of Cancer, Immunodeficiency, Autoimmune Disorders and Accelerated Aging

(<a href="https://www.naturalnews.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Natural News</a>) This finding can only be described as a true “horror” in its implications. <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/10/2056/htm" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Stunning new research published in Viruses</a>, part of the SARS-CoV-2 Host Cell Interactions edition of MDPI (Open Access Journals) reveals that vaccine spike proteins enter cell nuclei and wreak havoc on cells’ DNA repair mechanism, suppressing DNA repair by as much as 90%.
The research paper is entitled, “SARS–CoV–2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro” and is authored by Hui Jiang and Ya-Fang Mei, at the Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner–Gren Institute, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden, and the Department of Clinical Microbiology, Virology, Umeå University, SE-90185 Umeå, Sweden, respectively.
We have saved a copy of the research paper in a PDF document on NN servers at this URL: 
<a href="https://www.naturalnews.com/files/viruses-13-02056-v2.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://www.naturalnews.com/files/viruses-13-02056-v2.pdf</a>
In the conclusion of the paper, authors write, “We found that the spike protein markedly inhibited both BRCA1 and 53BP1 foci formation (Figure 3D–G). Together, these data show that the SARS–CoV–2 full–length spike protein inhibits DNA damage repair by hindering DNA repair protein recruitment.”
The DNA repair mechanism, known as NHEJ (Non-Homologous End Joining) is a kind of intracellular “emergency response” system that repairs double-stranded DNA breaks. Without the NHEJ mechanism, all advanced multi-cellular life would cease to exist. No human being, animal or plant can survive with the integrity of its genetic code being protected and constantly repaired through multiple mechanisms.
DNA damage can be caused by exposure to radiation, chemicals found in foods and personal care products, or even exposure to mammography equipment. Excessive sunlight exposure can also cause DNA breaks, and minor DNA mutations occur spontaneously in all living organisms. Airline pilots, for example, are routinely exposed to ionizing radiation due to flying at altitude.
In a normal, healthy person, the NHEJ mechanism repairs the DNA and prevents a pathogenic mutation from occurring. But in the presence of the vaccine spike protein, NHEJ effectiveness is suppressed by as much as 90%, meaning it is unable to do its job due to the suppressed ability to recruit proteins for repair.
As a result, the following “errors” are introduced into chromosomes inside the nuclei of human cells, all due to the presence of the spike protein from mRNA vaccines:
<div class="qjahNwsp"><a href="https://www.infowarsstore.com/specials-clearance/this-weeks-sales?ims=wsvpv&utm_campaign=blackfridayhero&utm_source=Infowars+Hero&utm_medium=banner&utm_content=blackfridayhero" target="_blank"><img src="https://api.directus.libertycdn.com/uploads/_/originals/BlackFridatSE-hero-385.jpg" /></a></div>
<ul>
<li>Mutations or “errors” in the genetic sequence.</li>
<li>DELETIONS of entire segments of genetic code.</li>
<li>INSERTIONS of incorrect segments.</li>
<li>Mixing and matching / permutations of genetic code.</li>
</ul>
These errors, when expressed through cell division and replication, result in:
<ul>
<li>An explosion of cancer and cancer tumors throughout the body</li>
<li>Loss of production of immune system B and T cells (i.e. induced immunodeficiency)</li>
<li>Autoimmune disorders</li>
<li>Accelerated aging and reduced telomere length</li>
<li>Loss of functioning of complex organ systems such as circulatory, neurological, endocrine, muskuloskeletal, etc.</li>
<li>Cellular damage resembling radiation poisoning as cells destroy themselves from within</li>
</ul>
Many of these effects are, of course, fatal. Others will burden vaccine victims with horrendous debilitating injuries and organ malfunctions that will require a lifetime of medical intervention.
<h2>Spike protein goes into the nucleus of the cell</h2>
From the paper linked above:
Mechanistically, we found that the spike protein localizes in the nucleus and inhibits DNA damage repair by impeding key DNA repair protein BRCA1 and 53BP1 recruitment to the damage site.
This means that the spike protein, which is generated in cell ribosomes after the cells have been hijacked by mRNA vaccines, doesn’t always leave the cell and enter the bloodstream as we are told by mRNA vaccine proponents. In some cases, the spike protein enters the cell nucleus. There, it interferes with the DNA repair mechanism as described throughout this article.
“Surprisingly, we found the abundance of the spike protein in the nucleus (Figure 1A),” concluded study authors.
This means, without question, mRNA vaccines result in chromosomal alterations in the body’s cells. It is confirmation that such vaccines are, indeed, wreaking havoc with genetic integrity and are exhibiting side effects that have not been anticipated or described by mRNA vaccine proponents.
Dr. Thomas Levy writes about the toxicity of the spike protein on <a href="http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v17n24.shtml" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Orthomolecular.org</a>:
Concern has been raised regarding the dissemination of the spike protein throughout the body after vaccination. Rather than staying localized at the injection site in order to provoke the immune response and nothing more, spike protein presence has been detected throughout the body of some vaccinated individuals. Furthermore, it appears that some of the circulating spike proteins simply bind the ACE2 receptors without entering the cell, inducing an autoimmune response to the entire cell-spike protein entity. Depending on the cell type that binds the spike protein, any of a number of autoimmune medical conditions can result.
More alarmingly, Dr. Levy explains that current evidence shows the spike protein continues to produced in the body, following the initial mRNA injection. He explains:
While the underlying pathology remains to be completely defined, one explanation for the problems with thrombotic tendencies and other symptomatology seen with chronic COVID and post-vaccination patients relates directly to the persistent presence of the spike protein part of the coronavirus. Some reports assert that the spike protein can continue to be produced after the initial binding to the ACE2 receptors and entry into some of the cells that it initially targets. The clinical pictures of chronic COVID and post-vaccine toxicity appear very similar, and both are likely due to this continued presence, and body-wide dissemination, of the spike protein (Mendelson et al., 2020; Aucott and Rebman, 2021; Levy, 2021; Raveendran, 2021).
<h2>Full-length spike protein resulted in the greatest suppression of NHEJ DNA repair mechanism</h2>
See the figures below. SARS-CoV-2 viral fragments are named “Nsp1, Nsp5” and so on. The full-length spike is called “Spike” and the nucleocapsid — another structural part of the whole spike protein pathogen — is identified separately.
From the study:
Overexpression of Nsp1, Nsp5, Nsp13, Nsp14, and spike proteins diminished the efficiencies of both HR and NHEJ repair (Figure 1B–E and Figure S2A,B).
Figures C and E show the suppression of NHEJ repair by these various portions of viral fragments. (See the blue vertical graph lines representing activity / efficiency levels of the DNA repair mechanism).
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img alt="" class="wp-image-125890" sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" src="https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/MDPI-Sars-CoV-2-Spike-DNA-Damage-Repair-Figure-1-600.jpeg" srcset="https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/MDPI-Sars-CoV-2-Spike-DNA-Damage-Repair-Figure-1-600-269x300.jpeg 269w, https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/MDPI-Sars-CoV-2-Spike-DNA-Damage-Repair-Figure-1-600.jpeg 600w" /></figure>
What these data show is that the greatest suppression of NHEJ activity is measured when the full spike protein is present. From the study:
Together, these data show that the SARS–CoV–2 full–length spike protein inhibits DNA damage repair by hindering DNA repair protein recruitment.
This is the spike protein that’s generated by the body’s own cells after being injected with an mRNA vaccine:
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img alt="" class="wp-image-125893" sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" src="https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/MDPI-Sars-CoV-2-Spike-DNA-Damage-Repair-Figure-1-C-Spike-600.jpeg" srcset="https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/MDPI-Sars-CoV-2-Spike-DNA-Damage-Repair-Figure-1-C-Spike-600-300x235.jpeg 300w, https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/MDPI-Sars-CoV-2-Spike-DNA-Damage-Repair-Figure-1-C-Spike-600.jpeg 600w" /></figure>
In figure 2, below, we see that the suppression of NHEJ activity exhibits a dose-dependent response to the presence of spike protein (figures 2B and 2C). This indicates that the more spike proteins are present, the greater the suppression of DNA repair:
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img alt="" class="wp-image-125894" sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" src="https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/MDPI-Sars-CoV-2-Spike-DNA-Damage-Repair-Figure-2-600.jpeg" srcset="https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/MDPI-Sars-CoV-2-Spike-DNA-Damage-Repair-Figure-2-600-231x300.jpeg 231w, https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/MDPI-Sars-CoV-2-Spike-DNA-Damage-Repair-Figure-2-600.jpeg 600w" /></figure>
The bottom right figure, 2G, shows how the presence of the spike protein inhibits DNA repair following various insults to the DNA, such as radiation, chemical exposure or oxidation. Importantly, as the study authors explain:
Following different DNA damage treatments, such as ?–irradiation, doxorubicin treatment, and H2O2 treatment, there is less repair in the presence of the spike protein (Figure 2F,G). Together, these data demonstrate that the spike protein directly affects DNA repair in the nucleus.
<h2>5G exposure, chemtrail exposure, food chemical exposure, mammography and even sunlight exposure will wreak havoc in those who have taken mRNA vaccines</h2>
The horrifying upshot of this finding is that people who have taken mRNA vaccines will experience suppressed DNA repair, escalating exposures that were once thought to be minor issues to significant threats to their health.
In other words, people exposed to 5G radiation, mammography exams, plasticizer chemicals in food products, and carcinogens in personal care products (laundry detergents, perfumes, shampoos, skin lotions, etc.) will be unable to repair the DNA damage caused by those exposures. Following relatively small exposures, they will begin to mutate and develop cancers throughout their bodies.
Don’t forget that 5G exposure results in peroxynitrite production in the blood, an extremely dangerous free radical that causes DNA damage in brain cells and tissue cells across the body.
This could even be described as a kind of binary weapon system where mRNA vaccines weaken DNA repair, and 5G exposure (or chemical exposure in the food supply) provides the weapon that breaks DNA strands and leads to the body being unable to maintain genetic integrity during cell replication. This doesn’t take long to be expressed in horrific physical ways, such as the attempted growing of internal organ tissues on the surface of the skin or face, which is why I have titled today’s Situation Update podcast, “Monsters, Zombies and Mutants.”
<h2>The presence of the spike protein interferes with normal immune function and leads to immunodeficiency (an AIDS-like condition)</h2>
This research also finds that spike proteins from mRNA vaccines can lead to immunodeficiency conditions, similar to AIDS. This is consistent with what we have previously reported about immune function dropping roughly 5% per week in those who have taken covid vaccines. From the study:
…[L]oss of function of key DNA repair proteins such as ATM, DNA–PKcs, 53BP1, et al., leads to defects in the NHEJ repair which inhibit the production of functional B and T cells, leading to immunodeficiency.
Immune function is also critically affected by the presence of the spike protein, potentially leading to cancerous mutations throughout the body’s cells. As the study explains:
DNA damage repair, especially NHEJ repair, is essential for V(D)J recombination, which lies at the core of B and T cell immunity.
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/non-homologous-end-joining" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">As Science Direct also explains</a>:
Maintaining genomic integrity is imperative for the survival of an organism. Among different DNA damages, double-strand breaks (DSBs) are considered as most deleterious since they can lead to cell death if left unrepaired or chromosomal rearrangements when mis-repaired, leading to cancer.
Further, mutations in NHEJ genes including Ku70 and Ku80 have been associated with shortened life spans in mice [54]. In addition, defects in DNA-PKcs (DNA-dependent protein kinase) resulted in impaired telomere maintenance and shortened life span in mice [55]. Taken together, these lines of evidence suggest that NHEJ plays an important role in preventing age-related increase in genomic instability and functional decline.
In effect, this means the spike protein’s suppression of the NHEJ DNA repair mechanism also leads to reduced lifespan and accelerated aging.
By some estimates, 50% of the people injected with mRNA vaccines will be dead within five years. Now we have a deeper understanding of the mechanisms by which those vaccine-induced fatalities may occur.
Hear the verbal explanation of all this in today’s Situation Update podcast:
We will cover more about this in tomorrow’s podcast as well. Get each day’s new podcast at:
<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport" target="_blank">https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport</a>
<hr class="wp-block-separator" />
<a href="https://banned.video/watch?id=61818afac1526b2b3264002e" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Wayne Allyn Root: Australian Lockdown Can’t Happen in America Because We Have Fighting In Our Blood</a>
 
 
source <a href="https://www.infowars.com/posts/science-horror-vaccine-spike-protein-enters-cell-nuclei-suppresses-dna-repair-engine-will-unleash-explosion-of-cancer-immunodeficiency-autoimmune-disorders-and-accelerated-aging">https://www.infowars.com/posts/science-horror-vaccine-spike-protein-enters-cell-nuclei-suppresses-dna-repair-engine-will-unleash-explosion-of-cancer-immunodeficiency-autoimmune-disorders-and-accelerated-aging</a>

news SCIENCE HORROR: Vaccine Spike Protein Enters Cell Nuclei, Suppresses DNA Repair Engine – Will Unleash Explosion of Cancer, Immunodeficiency, Autoimmune Disorders and Accelerated Aging

( Natural News ) This finding can only be described as a true “horror” in its implications. Stunning new research published in Viruses , p...

FDA Knew About Numerous Adverse Events For Children ‘Related’ To Pfizer Vaccine, Approved It Anyway

<h4>The Food And Drug Administration (FDA) approved an emergency use authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for children as young as 5 years old despite the fact that its Pfizer-connected advisory committee knew about numerous adverse events that were reported in Pfizer’s clinical trials for children, including adverse events that were determined to be “related” to the clinical vaccine trial.</h4>
The Briefing Packet for the FDA advisory committee meeting shows that the FDA advisers used clinical studies sponsored by BioNTech and conducted by or supported by Pfizer to approve the vaccine for young children.
Talk about a conflict of interest! 
<a href="https://nationalfile.com/fda-committee-members-reviewing-pfizer-vaccine-for-children-have-worked-for-pfizer-have-big-pfizer-connections/">NATIONAL FILE reported</a> on the FDA advisory committee’s massive Pfizer connections and how committee members have worked for Pfizer and are making money from the Pfizer vaccine.
So what kind of adverse events were discovered in the clinical trials for children?
The advisory committee meeting briefing packet, published by the FDA, shows that clinical trials found “related” illnesses including Lymphadenopathy, arthralgia, paresthesia, nervous tic, hematochezia (characterized by bloody stool, which sent the participant to the “emergency department”) pyrexia (fever), neutropenia (low white blood cell count), hypersensitivity reaction, angioedema, and rashes.
Meanwhile, a case of the blood vessel disorder Henoch-Schoenlein purpura was reported but was conveniently classified as “non related” to the vaccine experiment.
<a href="https://www.fda.gov/media/153409/download">Here is the “Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting October 26, 2021 Briefing Document” published by the FDA. </a>
Page 15 lists an “OVERVIEW OF CLINICAL STUDIES.”
<div class="R19BRCCe"><a href="https://www.infowarsstore.com/specials-clearance/this-weeks-sales?ims=wsvpv&utm_campaign=blackfridayhero&utm_source=Infowars+Hero&utm_medium=banner&utm_content=blackfridayhero" target="_blank"><img src="https://api.directus.libertycdn.com/uploads/_/originals/BlackFridatSE-hero-385.jpg" /></a></div>
Two clinical studies are listed.
The first clinical study listed is “Phase 1/2/3 Registrational Study C4591001,” which <a href="https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf">was sponsored by BioNTech and conducted by Pfizer.</a> 
The other clinical study listed is “Phase 1/2/3 Pediatric Study C4591007,” which is <a href="https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2020-005442-42/FI">listed as being sponsored by BioNTech</a> and supported by Pfizer.
“Pediatric Study c4591007” is an ongoing study and it was used by the FDA for approval of the vaccine for ages 5 to 12. That’s right.
The FDA meeting’s data was taken from an ongoing study conducted by the very makers of the vaccine.
The information below comes from the FDA Briefing Packet’s review of Pfizer Pediatric Study C4591007.
ON PAGE 39 the FDA document states (emphasis added):
“Lymphadenopathy is considered an adverse reaction to vaccine and is noted as such in the EUA Fact Sheet. Among approximately 2250 children 5 to <12 years of age randomized 2:1 to receive BNT162b2 or placebo, as of the data cutoff date (06 September 2021), 13 participants (0.9%) in the BNT162b2 group and 1 participant (0.1%) in the placebo group had events of lymphadenopathy.” Lymphadenopathy is a lymph nodes disease. On page 40 the document states that “Lymphadenopathy has been identified as related to BNT162b2 in individuals ≥12 years of age and it is also observed in the pediatric 5 to <12 years of age group.” The document states that “One participant in the BNT162b2 group had a related AE of mild arthralgia (right elbow joint pain), with an onset the same day as Dose 2 (administered in the left deltoid muscle), that was reported as resolved the next day.” The document states that “One participant in the BNT162b2 group had a related AE of moderate paresthesia (bilateral lower extremity tingling) with onset at 1 day post-Dose 2 and reported as recovered/resolved 3 days after onset.” The document states that “In the BNT162b2 group, a psychiatric disorder event of tic was reported in 1 participant: One participant in the BNT162b2 group had an AE of Grade 3 tic with onset at 7 days post Dose 2 and reported as recovering/resolving at the time of the data cutoff. The AE was considered by the investigator as related to study intervention.” The document later notes that “There were 6 participants (0.4%) in the BNT162b2 group and 3 participants (0.4%) in the placebo group had events of lymphadenopathy.”
On PAGE 42 the document states that a trial participant dropped out of the trial due to an Adverse Event, stating “One participant (0.1%) in the BNT162b2 group discontinued from the vaccination period due to an AE (details in Section 3.7.2) and two participants (0.1%) in the BNT162b2 group and 1 participant (0.1%) in the placebo group withdrew from the study before the 1-month post Dose 2 visit. Neither of these withdrawals was reported as due to an AE.”
One participant had blood that passed through his/her anus, which is known as hematochezia, characterized by bloody stool. The document states that “One participant in the BNT162b2 group had a non-serious related AE reported by the investigator as moderate hematochezia 4 days after Dose 2. The participant had heme occult positive stool; was seen in the emergency department, and had no further tests done; and went home and the event resolved the same day without sequelae. This participant had a medical history of asthma and nondrug allergy and had no other reported AEs.”
On page 45, the document discusses a test subject that withdrew from the trial after developing severe pyrexia, which means severe fever, as well as severe neutropenia, which means a shortage of white blood cells, and bleeding gums. The document states that “One participant withdrew due to an AE of severe pyrexia with onset of 2 days after Dose 1 considered by the investigator as related to study intervention that resolved at 1 day after onset. Participant also had severe neutropenia (‘worsening from baseline’) with onset of 3 days after Dose 1 considered by the investigator as related to study intervention and reported as resolving at the time of the data cutoff date. Participant had a medical history of benign transient neutropenia of unknown etiology, gingivitis, and otitis media. Prior to study enrollment, she had a full hematology work-up (including for possible leukemia) with baseline absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 480; the hematologist indicated no concerns with study participation. After Dose 1 Day 2 she reported a temperature of 40.1 °C. Her temperature returned to normal the next day. Two days after receiving Dose 1, the participant had a planned routine hematology appointment. The participant had an ANC of 20 and platelets were normal. No other symptoms or infections were reported at that time. Subsequently on Day 19 after Dose 1, the investigator was contacted by the participant’s caregiver who reported the participant had bleeding gums for 1 week prior. On Day 23, the participant attended Visit 2 to be seen by the investigator, was reported as doing well, and had a follow-up blood draw that showed the ANC had improved to 70. Dose 2 was not administered, and the participant was withdrawn from study intervention and remains in study follow-up. No other AEs were reported.”
The document states that “One participant without a reported medical history in the BNT162b2 had a related AE Type IV hypersensitivity reaction characterized by a rash on the forehead, earlobe, and right forearm 3 days after Dose 1. A dermatologist diagnosed the rash as a Type IV hypersensitivity reaction and characterized the rash as ‘plaque, erythematous and minimal crusting’, and prescribed Triamcinolone and Benadryl creams. No prohibited concomitant treatments or nonstudy vaccines had been administered. The event was reported as resolving 18 days after onset without sequelae. This participant had no other reported AEs. This participant received Dose 2 without any additional AEs reported post-dose.”
The document states that “One participant in the BNT162b2 group had a related AE of moderate angioedema reported as ‘perioral and periorbital angioedema due to allergic reaction’ and concurrent urticaria reported as ‘hives of the face and back caused due to allergic reaction’, both with onset of 2 days after Dose 2, and was reported as resolved 2 days after onset. Participant’s medical history included past allergy (hypersensitivity with mild rash) to a vaccine, Sever’s disease, contact dermatitis and seasonal allergies. This participant received no prohibited concomitant treatments or nonstudy vaccines. An analysis of angioedema cases reported in the BNT162b2 group included angioedema (see above) and urticaria (n=3). Two of the cases of urticaria were considered by the investigator as related to study intervention; one is described above (concurrent with angioedema).”
The document states that “Rashes were reported in 6 participants in the BNT162b2 group. Rashes considered as related to BNT162b2 were all mild or moderate included: rash maculo-papular, rash macular, rash papular and rash (n=1 each). Rash is considered an adverse reaction of the vaccine and is noted as such in the EUA Fact Sheet.”
On Page 47 the document details how a case of Henoch-Schoenlein purpura, a condition marked by bleeding and inflamed blood vessels, was conveniently labeled as “non related” by the vaccine makers’ clinical trial. The document states that “One participant in the BNT162b2 group had a non-serious unrelated event reported by the investigator as Henoch-Schoenlein purpura…One participant in the BNT162b2 group had a non related AE of mild Henoch Schoenlein purpura with onset of 21 days after Dose 1 and reported as ongoing at the time of the data cutoff date. The participant was treated with steroids and pain medication. Due to the initiation of steroids, the study Visit 2 appointment was delayed. This event was preceded by other non-related AEs: mild headache with onset at 10 days after Dose 1 and resolved in 2 days, and mild joint swelling of the right ankle with onset at 16 days after Dose 1 and resolved in 3 days. This participant had no reported medical history and received no prohibited concomitant treatments or nonstudy vaccines. As of the time of the data cutoff, Dose 2 was not administered.”
Negative “systemic events” and Adverse Effects were found in children between the ages of 5 and 12 and people between the ages of 16 to 25 in clinical trials of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine:
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img alt="" class="wp-image-125876" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" src="https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/study1-1024x625.jpg" srcset="https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/study1-300x183.jpg 300w, https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/study1-768x469.jpg 768w, https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/study1-1024x625.jpg 1024w" /></figure>
<hr class="wp-block-separator" />
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img alt="" class="wp-image-125877" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" src="https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/study2-1024x623.jpg" srcset="https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/study2-300x182.jpg 300w, https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/study2-768x467.jpg 768w, https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/study2-1024x623.jpg 1024w" /></figure>
<hr class="wp-block-separator" />
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img alt="" class="wp-image-125878" sizes="(max-width: 923px) 100vw, 923px" src="https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/study3.jpg" srcset="https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/study3-300x285.jpg 300w, https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/study3-768x731.jpg 768w, https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/study3.jpg 923w" /></figure>
<hr class="wp-block-separator" />
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img alt="" class="wp-image-125879" sizes="(max-width: 832px) 100vw, 832px" src="https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/study4.jpg" srcset="https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/study4-300x282.jpg 300w, https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/study4-768x723.jpg 768w, https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/study4.jpg 832w" /></figure>
<hr class="wp-block-separator" />
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img alt="" class="wp-image-125880" sizes="(max-width: 765px) 100vw, 765px" src="https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/study5.jpg" srcset="https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/study5-300x296.jpg 300w, https://api-assets.infowars.com/2021/11/study5.jpg 765w" /></figure>
 
 
source <a href="https://www.infowars.com/posts/fda-knew-about-numerous-adverse-events-for-children-related-to-pfizer-vaccine-approved-it-anyway">https://www.infowars.com/posts/fda-knew-about-numerous-adverse-events-for-children-related-to-pfizer-vaccine-approved-it-anyway</a>

news FDA Knew About Numerous Adverse Events For Children ‘Related’ To Pfizer Vaccine, Approved It Anyway

The Food And Drug Administration (FDA) approved an emergency use authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for children as young as 5 ye...

Gov. DeSantis Blasts Biden Plan to Shower Cash on Illegal Alien Families ‘Separated’ Under Trump

news Gov. DeSantis Blasts Biden Plan to Shower Cash on Illegal Alien Families ‘Separated’ Under Trump

[unable to retrieve full-text content] 'I've seen a lot in my day but this takes the cake,' Florida governor says of shocking r...

Arsonist Savagely Beaten After Setting Fire on French Bus

news Arsonist Savagely Beaten After Setting Fire on French Bus

posted a day ago source https://www.infowars.com/posts/arsonist-savagely-beaten-after-setting-fire-on-french-bus

Americans Who Received J&J Jab More Likely To Develop Rare Blood Clots, New Study Finds

It’s starting to seem like <a href="https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/fda-approves-moderna-boosters-high-risk-patients-after-hinting-rejection">nary a day goes by that the world doesn’t isn’t confronted with new research</a> raising safety questions about either the mRNA vaccines (mostly Moderna) or the adenovirus-vector jabs like the AstraZeneca and J&J jabs.
On Monday, the bad news focused on the adenovirus jabs, particularly the J&J jab, as researchers from the Mayo Clinic in Rochester Minnesota, who published their findings in <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6352?guestAccessKey=f6fff3e2-d1bf-4380-955b-4320910dbcaf&utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_content=tfl&utm_term=110121" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">JAMA Internal Medicine</a>, compared data from the general population before the pandemic to data gathered from reported vaccine side effects suffered by Americans.
What they found was disturbing: a person who received the vaccine was 3.5x as likely to develop brain blood clots as an average person before the pandemic.
Blood clots, and specifically cerebral venous sinus thrombosis are well known side-effects of the J&J vaccine, and the discovery of this risk was the reason usage of the vaccine was paused in April. Still, however, the team insists the side-effect is rare and that the findings must be looked at in the context of the effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing severe cases COVID-19.
The data were gathered from Olmstead, County, Minnesota – a county of around 158,000 people situated around 90 miles southeast of Minneapolis – from 2001 to 2015, per <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10152723/Americans-received-one-dose-J-J-Covid-vaccine-3-5-times-likely-develop-blood-clots.html">the Daily Mail.</a>
They then used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to find diagnoses of blood clots in people who received the J&J vaccine between the jab’s approval date at the end of February 2021 to May 7.
During the 14 years before the pandemic, there were only 39 Olmstead residents who developed CVST – a rare, potentially deadly, blood clotting condition.
However, after the jabs were being used to treat COVID, that number shot up to 46 reports of CVST confirmed in the VAERS program following patients’ who received J&J jabs. Alhough eight were eventually removed from that pool for either being duplicate reports or not being professionally diagnosed. In total, 38 cases tied to the J&J vaccine were detected, with over 70% being among women.
<div class="1e7tehrI"><a href="https://www.infowarsstore.com/specials-clearance/this-weeks-sales?ims=wsvpv&utm_campaign=blackfridayhero&utm_source=Infowars+Hero&utm_medium=banner&utm_content=blackfridayhero" target="_blank"><img src="https://api.directus.libertycdn.com/uploads/_/originals/BlackFridatSE-hero-385.jpg" /></a></div>
The discrepancy here is pretty difficult to ignore.
A mother reads the news that her daughter can finally go outside now that the covid vaccine has been approved for children.
around 8.7MM doses of the J&J vaccine had been administered in the US between February and May.
<ul>
<li>Adjusted for population, there were 2.46 cases of CVST out of every 100,000 person-years, pre-COVID, pre-vaccine.</li>
<li>However, when also adjusted for population, there were 8.65 cases out of every 100,000 person-years among people who received the vaccine – a rate 3.5 times higher than the general population.</li>
</ul>
Could it be a coincidence? Perhaps… but it certainly justifies closer examination.
 
 
source <a href="https://www.infowars.com/posts/americans-who-received-jj-jab-more-likely-to-develop-rare-blood-clots-new-study-finds">https://www.infowars.com/posts/americans-who-received-jj-jab-more-likely-to-develop-rare-blood-clots-new-study-finds</a>

news Americans Who Received J&J Jab More Likely To Develop Rare Blood Clots, New Study Finds

It’s starting to seem like nary a day goes by that the world doesn’t isn’t confronted with new research raising safety questions about eit...