ANONYMOUS - OUR VOICE

How Jeff Bezos Trumped Tabloids: A Story of Money, Sex And Power

<div class="ins_instory_dv">
<div class="ins_instory_dv_cont"><img alt="How Jeff Bezos Trumped Tabloids: A Story of Money, Sex And Power" src="https://c.ndtvimg.com/2021-05/8k1gbncs_bezos-mackenzie_625x300_05_May_21.jpg" title="How Jeff Bezos Trumped Tabloids: A Story of Money, Sex And Power" /></div>
For years, Bezos wove the story of his courtship and marriage to MacKenzie Bezos into his public persona.
</div>
"Raise your hand if you think you've had a harder week than I've had."
It was Feb. 14, 2019, in the early afternoon, and for perhaps the first time in the 25-year history of Amazon.com Inc., Jeff Bezos was prepared to explain himself to his employees.
Bezos was a master compartmentalizer; his ability to keep the intricate threads of his personal and professional lives separate was unrivaled. This talent had allowed him to build Amazon while also running a space company, Blue Origin LLC, and reviving the  Washington Post-all while keeping his family life private. But those threads had gotten tangled. Bezos, a father of four, was the subject of tabloid stories in the  National Enquirer about his relationship with a married former television host.
Rather than doing what most billionaires do under such scrutiny-keep quiet and wait for the storm to pass-Bezos had gone public. He'd written a salacious blog post that included descriptions of photos the Enquirerclaimed it had acquired-among them: a "below the belt selfie." He'd suggested that the paper was doing this as political retribution for the Post's reporting on the Enquirer's connections to the Trump administration.
<div class="ins_instory_dv">
<div class="ins_instory_dv_cont"><img alt="nrjib45" class="lozad" src="https://c.ndtvimg.com/2021-05/nrjib45_jeff-bezos-bloomberg_625x300_05_May_21.jpg" /></div>
Featured in Bloomberg Businessweek, May 10, 2021. Photographer: Alex Wong/Getty Images
</div>
Now, facing Amazon's leadership group, the S-team, Bezos addressed the elephant in the room. "The story is completely wrong and out of order," he said. "MacKenzie and I have had good, healthy, adult conversations about it. She is fine. The kids are fine. The media is having a field day." Then he tried to refocus the conversation on the matter at hand: personnel projections for the current year. "All of this is very distracting, so thank you for being focused on the business," he said.
The affair came as a shock to most senior executives, though recently some had noticed changes in their boss's behavior. Meetings for Op1, Amazon's term for its annual late-summer planning cycle, had been delayed or postponed; longtime deputies were finding it difficult to get time on his calendar. There were also those helipads that Amazon had requested for its planned outposts in New York City and Arlington, Va. These had enraged local officials, already skeptical about giving billions of dollars in tax breaks to a company with a trillion-dollar market value, and had contributed to the scrapping of a planned second headquarters in Queens.
As some in the meeting were now well aware, the boss's new girlfriend, Lauren Sanchez, was a helicopter pilot. Bezos had taken flying lessons himself. And then there was the curious matter of the stock. On Jan. 9, Jeff and MacKenzie Bezos had announced their divorce via Twitter. But a few weeks before that, Amazon's legal and finance departments had begun asking the company's largest institutional shareholders whether they would support the creation of a new class of stock with reduced voting rights. Dual-class stock structures had been used at Facebook, Google, and Snap to concentrate voting power among company founders, giving them ultimate sway over matters of corporate governance. Amazon had gone public a decade before those structures were in vogue, so Bezos hadn't had such power. Now he apparently wanted it.
Amazon vigorously disputed that Bezos' personal life had anything to do with these moves. Public-relations representatives claimed that having helipads in New York City would have been "useful for certain events, like receiving dignitaries." The official story about the share classes was that Amazon was exploring ways to keep giving stock to fulfillment center workers and that it could use the second class of stock to pursue acquisitions. Those explanations had always seemed a little thin. But after Bezos tweeted news of his divorce, some who'd heard about the stock plan came to assume that it was all about Bezos remaining firmly in control of the company in the face of a costly divorce settlement that would end up reducing his stake from 18% to 12%.
It was the first time some senior executives could remember seeing Bezos cornered by adversaries, who now included, improbably, a Hollywood manager looking to peddle explicit selfies. On the other hand, the episode was the culmination of Bezos' decade-long transformation from a single-minded tech geek to the master of a trillion-dollar empire. His enemies now included Donald Trump, who despised the Post, and Mohammed bin Salman, the crown prince of Saudi Arabia, who was embittered by the paper's coverage of the murder of dissident reporter Jamal Khashoggi and would later be implicated in a supposed plot to put spywareonto Bezos' smartphone. Bezos was navigating all of this as he always had: by thinking unconventionally and manipulating the levers of media. Somehow, his way usually worked.
Back at Amazon's headquarters complex in Seattle, on the sixth floor of Day 1 tower, the planning meeting stretched into the early evening. Harried finance executives scurried in and out of the room distributing spreadsheets. Bezos might not be able to control the scrum of tabloid press gleefully chronicling his sybaritic escapades with Sanchez, but he could control head count growth across all of Amazon's divisions.
As the sun set over the Olympic Mountains, casting a golden glow into the conference room, executives started furtively glancing at their phones and responding to texts from their significant others. Finally, at 7:30, Senior Vice President Jeff Blackburn spoke up and said what everyone else was thinking: "Hey Jeff, how long do you think this meeting is going to go? A lot of us have plans." It was, after all, Valentine's Day.
"Oh, that's right," said Bezos, laughing. "I forgot about that."
For years, Bezos wove the story of his courtship and marriage to MacKenzie Bezos (now MacKenzie Scott) into his public persona. In speeches, he joked about his bachelorhood quest to find a woman resourceful enough to "get me out of a Third World prison," as if the bookish MacKenzie, a novelist with an English degree from Princeton, might one day rappel down from the roof of some godforsaken jail with a lock pick in her teeth.
But while Bezos and his handlers crafted the image of a doting husband and family man, he and his wife developed diverging appetites for public attention. After Amazon opened a Hollywood outpost and began producing movies, Bezos attended the Golden Globes and Academy Awards, showed up at premieres, and hosted an annual gathering at a palatial property in Beverly Hills, high above the Sunset Strip. At one such party in December 2016, for Manchester by the Sea, Amazon Studios' first Oscar winner, he was photographed with Sanchez and her then-husband, Patrick Whitesell, the powerful chairman of the Endeavor talent agency.
MacKenzie accompanied her husband to some Hollywood events but, by her own admission, wasn't a social person. "Cocktail parties for me can be nerve-racking," she toldVogue. "The brevity of conversations, the number of them-it's not my sweet spot." Friends said both parents were committed to their four children and to keeping them as far away as possible from the corrosive impact of celebrity and garish wealth.
By 2018, Bezos was seeing Sanchez, legal documents later showed, while keeping up the appearance of an intact marriage. His new girlfriend, then 48, was ebullient and sociable and, in many ways, the opposite of his wife. Like Bezos, Sanchez had been born in Albuquerque, and though their families didn't know one another, the couple would later chart all the coincidental overlap among their relatives at places such as the Bank of New Mexico, where Bezos' parents, Jackie and Mike, first met, and where Sanchez's cousin had once worked. Sanchez's father, Ray, ran a local flight school, Golden Airways, and her mother, Eleanor, had a pilot's license and had survived a plane crash when Lauren was 9 years old.
In the late '90s, after starting a broadcast news career at a local TV station in Phoenix, Sanchez became a correspondent for the syndicated gossip program Extra and then a morning anchor on Fox's Good Day LA. She hosted the first season of the reality show So You Think You Can Dance and had some small movie roles-that's her playing a news reporter 91 minutes into Fight Club. She had a son with NFL Hall of Famer and broadcaster Tony Gonzalez before marrying Whitesell and having another son and a daughter.
By the beginning of 2018, her helicopter company, Black Ops Aviation, was filming documentary videos for Blue Origin and posting them on YouTube. A few weeks later, Sanchez told her older brother, Michael, that she wanted to introduce him to her new beau. In April they had dinner at the Hearth & Hound, a hip West Hollywood restaurant, accompanied by Michael's husband and two other friends. Michael sat across from Jeff, and the two hit it off. Later, Michael expressed alarm about how his sister and the Amazon chief executive officer openly expressed their affections, potentially within sight of the local paparazzi, while both were still married.
If anyone cautioned Bezos that an affair with a married minor celebrity might prompt an unpleasant public reaction, he ignored those warnings. He brought Sanchez to Seattle with her mother and brother, where they got a VIP tour of the Spheres, the three interlinked glass conservatories at Amazon headquarters, and to Washington, D.C., where he showed her the Post's printing presses. She attended a Blue Origin rocket launch that summer and helped produce an inspirational 2-minute video for Bezos' rocket company featuring aerial shots and a rare voice-over by the CEO himself, as Your Blue Room by U2 and Brian Eno played in the background. "The human need to explore is deep within all of us," Bezos intoned at the start of the video.
Like many modern couples, Bezos and Sanchez's relationship played out digitally as well. The richest man in the world was, to put it bluntly, sexting. Sanchez shared many of these texts and photographs with her brother, a talent manager who represented a variety of cable news pundits and reality-TV contestants. But all of that was happening well outside Bezos' line of sight. He was enthralled by the adventurous Sanchez, and by nature he wasn't predisposed to be paranoid or immediately skeptical of anyone-especially not the brother of his new paramour. His philosophy, according to a friend, was essentially: "It's better to assume trust and find out that you are wrong than to always assume people are trying to screw you over."
Over the summer of 2018, as the romance between Bezos and Sanchez intensified, the Enquirer was coming off a catastrophic few years. Newsstand sales were slipping, and the paper's publisher, David Pecker, had been accused of buying the rights to stories about his friend Donald Trump's marital infidelities and then declining to publish them, a practice known as "catch and kill." This had brought the Enquirer's parent company, American Media Inc., or AMI, to the attention of federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York, who were investigating potential violations of campaign finance laws.
Pecker's top editor, Chief Content Officer Dylan Howard, was a short and stout 36-year-old Australian and an acid-penned chronicler of the hypocrisies and indiscretions of American celebrities. The journalistic force behind such tabloid supernovas as Mel Gibson's antisemitic rants and Arnold Schwarzenegger's love child, Howard was protective of his work and combative toward rivals. When the Post aggressively covered AMI's catch-and-kill problems, Howard told reporters to look into its wealthy owner's personal life.
One possible line of inquiry, according to an email that went out to AMI staff in late summer, was to examine Bezos' relationship with the family of his biological father, Ted Jorgensen, and why the CEO hadn't contacted them when Jorgensen was dying in 2015.
The next day, Monday, Sept. 10, Michael Sanchez wrote an email to Andrea Simpson, an L.A.-based reporter for AMI. Sanchez and Simpson were close friends. He regularly sent her news about his clients, and they had once gotten tattoos together on a whim. (His, on his forearm, read Je suis la tempete: "I am the storm.") In the email, Sanchez said he had a hot tip for Simpson. A friend, he wrote, worked for a "Bill Gates type" who was married and having an affair with "a B-list married actress." The friend, Sanchez wrote, had compromising photos of the couple but wanted a six-figure payout for the scoop. Sanchez claimed to be working as the middleman.
Simpson and her editors in New York could only guess at the identities of the mystery lovers, speculating in emails about such figures as Evan Spiegel and Mark Zuckerberg. For weeks, Sanchez kept them guessing and tried to bump up his asking price by hinting that the story could end up with a British tabloid. In early October, he met with Simpson and showed her text messages and photos with the faces obscured. "Just doing a look around and by the body, I think it may be Jeff Bezos," Simpson wrote to her bosses.
Finally, on Oct. 18, Sanchez called up Howard and revealed that the "Bill Gates type" was in fact Amazon's CEO. Sanchez and AMI then signed a contract, entitling him to a payout of about $200,000-among the most the Enquirer had ever spent on a story. The contract stipulated that the paper would make every effort to safeguard Sanchez's anonymity and withhold his identity as the source of the scoop.
Sanchez hadn't yet revealed the name of the "B-list married actress," but it didn't take long for Enquirer editors, who dispatched photographers to track Bezos' jet, to figure it out. Howard was at an entertainment industry trade show in Cannes, France, when he received photos of Amazon's CEO and Lauren disembarking from his Gulfstream G650ER.
On Oct. 23, Michael Sanchez flew to New York, dined with Howard and James Robertson, another Enquirer editor, and corroborated what they now knew. He also showed them a flash drive containing a collection of texts to his sister from Bezos, as well as a handful of personal photographs that the couple had exchanged, and he intimated that at a later date he could show them a more explicit photo that Bezos had sent of his manhood to Lauren.
There would later be an abundance of speculation about how the Enquirer got the Bezos-Sanchez story-including unproven allegations that Sanchez's ex-husband, Patrick Whitesell, was involved, as well as international intrigue involving Saudi Arabia. But Howard, Robertson, and Simpson would all later submit in federal court that Michael Sanchez was the sole source of all the information and compromising material they received during the investigation.
Inside AMI's drab offices at the southern tip of Manhattan, the Bezos story was met with both excitement and anxiety. The company had filed for bankruptcy protection in 2010 and was loaded with debt from acquiring magazines such as In Touch and Life & Style. An effort to secure an investment from Saudi Arabia to finance a bid to buy Time wasn't panning out, and Anthony Melchiorre, the seldom-photographed managing partner of the company's majority owner, New Jersey hedge fund Chatham Asset Management, was anxious about anything that might land AMI in fresh legal peril.
That September, AMI had signed a nonprosecution agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice over allegations that it had tried to bury negative stories about Trump. The deal required its executives to cooperate with the federal investigation of Trump lawyer Michael Cohen and to operate in the future with unimpeachable honesty. It ensured the company would remain under prosecutors' watchful eyes for years. Breaking the agreement could mean financial ruin for AMI.
Pecker, a temperamental boss who conducted much of his work from his cellphone while driving between his homes and offices in Connecticut and New York City, called one draft of the Bezos article "the best piece of journalism the Enquirer has ever done" and bragged in an email to editors that "each page of a story should be another death blow for Bezos," according to a person with knowledge of the criminal investigations. But Pecker was also terrified of getting sued by the man with the deepest pockets in the world. He demanded the story be "100% bulletproof" and vacillated about when, and even whether, they should publish.
For the rest of that fall, the Enquirer worked on the story with Michael Sanchez's help. He emailed the paper more photographs and text messages and tipped off editors to the couple's travel plans. When he had dinner with Bezos and his sister at the Felix Trattoria restaurant in Venice, Calif., on Nov. 30, two reporters were stationed at tables nearby as photographers clicked away surreptitiously. On the promised explicit selfie, though, Sanchez seemed to equivocate. He arranged to share it with Howard in L.A. in early November, then canceled the meeting. A few weeks later, on Nov. 21, after Enquirer editors kept hounding him, he finally agreed to show it to Simpson while Howard and Robertson watched via FaceTime from New York.
None of this, Sanchez claims, was a betrayal of his sister. She and Bezos were conducting their relationship out in the open, and it was only a matter of time before their families and the larger world discovered it. "Everything I did protected Jeff, Lauren, and my family," Sanchez later said in an email. "I would never sell out anyone." He also believed, naively, that his source agreement with AMI precluded the media company from using the most embarrassing material he had provided them.
On one issue, at least, it appears that Sanchez didn't betray his sister. He later told FBI investigators that he never actually had an explicit photograph of Bezos in his possession. In the FaceTime meeting on Nov. 21, Sanchez didn't show a picture of Bezos at all. It was a random photograph of male genitalia that he'd captured from an escort website called Rent.Men.
On Jan. 7, 2019, Enquirer editors sent texts to Bezos and Lauren that started with a single, incendiary sentence: "I write to request an interview with you about your love affair." The couple moved swiftly in response. Lauren turned to the person closest to her who best knew the brazen byways of the tabloid industry: her brother. Michael innocently offered to exploit his relationships with Enquirer editors to find out what they had. After signing a $25,000-a-month contract with his sister, he called Howard to announce that he was acting as her representative and suggested that he come to New York to review the paper's reporting (which, of course, he had provided). Confident in the promise of confidentiality from AMI, Michael was now playing both sides.
Bezos, meanwhile, involved his longtime security consultant, Gavin de Becker, as well as de Becker's L.A.-based entertainment attorney, Marty Singer. And, early on Jan. 9, he instructed Amazon's PR department to release the news of his marital breakup from his official Twitter account. "We want to make people aware of a development in our lives," the statement began. "After a long period of loving exploration and trial separation, we have decided to divorce and continue our shared lives as friends."
The Enquirer published on Mondays, but Howard, reacting quickly, persuaded Pecker to authorize a special 11-page print run and posted the paper's first story online that evening, a Wednesday. "Married Amazon Boss Jeff Bezos Getting Divorced Over Fling With Movie Mogul's Wife," screamed the headline. During the next five days, the Enquirerpublished additional stories with more details about Bezos and Sanchez and their private text exchanges.
A few days later, Michael brokered a temporary cease-fire: AMI would stop publishing articles in exchange for exclusive paparazzi access to Lauren while she walked with two friends at the Santa Monica airport. The article ran on Jan. 14 in AMI's Us Weekly, along with canned quotes and the gentle headline, "First Photos Show Jeff Bezos' Girlfriend Lauren Sanchez Carefree After Scandal."
After the story ran, Michael texted Howard to thank him. "The level of cooperation that you and I have built in 14 days will be written about in textbooks," he wrote. The next week, Howard emailed Michael and reassured him that his anonymity as the original leaker was secure. "The untold story-if you will-has not been told," he wrote. "I'm saving it for my tombstone."
But Bezos wasn't satisfied. He wondered if the Enquirer's story had been political retribution for articles published by the Washington Postand gave de Becker "whatever budget he needed to pursue the facts" of how the paper obtained his private messages. De Becker had served on two presidential advisory boards, written four books about the psychology of violence, and consulted for a litany of high-profile political and entertainment figures. Bezos had selected his 1997 book, The Gift of Fear: Survival Signals That Protect Us From Violence, as one of the first topics of discussion for the S-team reading club and had personally ensured that it was featured in the Amazon Books stores.
After a series of phone calls and text messages with Michael, de Becker sensed something was amiss. To publicize his suspicions, de Becker turned to Daily Beast Co., the media company run by Barry Diller, a friend of Bezos'. In an article on Jan. 31, the Daily Beast revealed that de Becker had identified Michael as a possible culprit. But he also floated an alternative scenario-one that cast Bezos as a patron of truth-telling journalism and the adversary to the fact-challenged U.S. president. He claimed the Enquirer's investigation was tied to Trump's campaign against the Post, opining in the article that "strong leads point to political motives."
There was no evidence behind this insinuation, but it shifted the advantage to Bezos. AMI's boss, Pecker, fretted that even a rumor about the paper's involvement in a political plot against a renowned billionaire might undermine its nonprosecution agreement. He implored Howard to settle the feud with Bezos' camp and to secure an acknowledgment that the investigation wasn't politically motivated and that the Enquirerhadn't used illegal means in scoring the story.
Over the first week in February, Howard asked Singer, de Becker's attorney, to get Bezos and de Becker to accept that the Enquirer articles weren't a political hit job and promised that he would cease publication of damaging stories. Singer wanted to know exactly what unpublished text messages and photos the paper possessed. Howard was uncertain; he suspected the lawyer was hunting for confirmation of the identity of his anonymous source. And he was nervous about an upcoming story in the Post that threatened to again assign political motives to the Enquirer's investigation.
In an email he sent to Singer on the afternoon of Feb. 5, AMI's chief content officer wrote, "with the Washington Post poised to publish unsubstantiated rumors of the National Enquirer's initial report, I wanted to describe to you the photos obtained during our newsgathering." Howard then listed the nine personal photos that Bezos and Lauren had exchanged. These were the pictures she'd shared with her brother and which her brother had passed to the Enquirer.
With an abundance of misplaced swagger, Howard also referenced the "below-the-belt selfie" that he'd captured via FaceTime from the meeting between Michael and Simpson. Unbeknownst to Howard, he was bragging about the anonymous image that Michael had lifted from Rent.Men. "It would give no editor pleasure to send this email," Howard concluded. "I hope common sense can prevail-and quickly."
But Bezos' team instead pressed their advantage. In a Washington Post articlepublished that night, de Becker once again identified Michael as a possible culprit and charged that the leak was "politically motivated." After the article was published, Pecker called Howard to say that Melchiorre, the hedge fund manager, was "ballistic" and again pressured Howard to stop the madness. Howard then started negotiating directly over the phone with de Becker. Suspicious and wary, both recorded the phone calls.
In the call transcripts, Howard appears to try to avoid making explicit threats but continues to reserve the paper's rights to publish the materials. "This is not in any way to be construed as some form of blackmail or anything like that!" he tells the veteran investigator at one point. "It's in both parties' interest to come to terms, given the specter of legal claims that are flying around."
Howard and de Becker appeared to make progress. On Feb. 6, AMI's deputy general counsel sent the proposed terms of an agreement via email to Bezos' team. AMI would agree not to publish or share any of the unpublished photos or texts if Bezos and his reps joined the company in publicly rejecting the notion that the Enquirer's reporting was politically motivated.
Bezos viewed the email as blatantly extortive. On Feb. 7 he told his advisers that he knew exactly what he was going to do. He wrote a 1,000-word-plus essay titled "No Thank You, Mr. Pecker" and handed it off to Amazon's senior vice president of global corporate affairs, Jay Carney, whose brow furrowed in surprise as he read it for the first time while on a videoconference with colleagues. Then Bezos had it uploaded to the publishing site Medium.
The post was stunning. In it, Bezos included the emails from AMI's attorney and top editor in their humiliating entirety. But, however embarrassing it was to have his sexts described in detail, Bezos knew they were also damning for AMI. "Something unusual happened to me yesterday," he wrote in the swaggering tone of someone supremely confident in his position. "I was made an offer I couldn't refuse. Or at least that's what the top people at the National Enquirer thought. I'm glad they thought that, because it emboldened them to put it all in writing." He neglected to mention that they had only done so after being pressed by a lawyer working on his behalf. Bezos, it seemed, had manipulated his adversaries into creating an incriminating paper trail.
Bezos then made explicit what de Becker had only implied: He suggested AMI was attacking him on behalf of the Trump administration and the government of Saudi Arabia. His ownership of the Washington Post, Bezos wrote, "is a complexifier for me. It's unavoidable that certain powerful people who experience Washington Post news coverage will wrongly conclude I am their enemy." He also added that he didn't regret owning the paper. It was, he wrote, "something I will be most proud of when I'm 90 and reviewing my life, if I'm lucky enough to live that long."
This noble sentiment, of course, had little to do with his extramarital relationship, or the scheming of his girlfriend's brother, or the desperate attempts of AMI to escape a cloud of political suspicion. It was, in other words, a public-relations masterstroke. Bezos cast himself as a sympathetic defender of the press and an opponent of "AMI's long-earned reputation for weaponizing journalistic privileges, hiding behind important protections, and ignoring the tenets and purpose of true journalism."
To interested readers, Bezos was taking a brave stand against the devious tactics of Trump's allies while vulnerably offering his own embarrassing photographs as collateral. "Bezos Exposes Pecker," declared the New York Post memorably, as public sympathies shifted to his side.
De Becker followed up those assertions in March by writing an article for the Daily Beast. He pointed to AMI's frantic attempts to defend itself from the charge of engaging in a political conspiracy and suggested that there must be another layer of hidden truth in the whole ordeal. "Our investigators and several experts concluded with high confidence that the Saudis had access to Bezos' phone and gained private information," he wrote. "As of today, it is unclear to what degree, if any, AMI was aware of the details." AMI denied the allegation, disclosing that Michael Sanchez, not any kind of international or cyber espionage, had been its source.
But none of that helped AMI. An unfavorable media narrative crystallized almost immediately in which Mohammed bin Salman's regime had learned of Bezos' relationship with Lauren and alerted the Enquirer or even supplemented the information it received from her brother. Considering Pecker's unsuccessful courtship of the Saudi kingdom for financing, that possibility might make certain logical sense if you squinted hard enough. But there was no hard evidence to support the hypothesis-only a fog of overlapping events, weak ties among disparate figures, and more strange coincidences.
Once again, Bezos had come out on top. His navigation of the crisis had been typical of his idiosyncratic approach to building Amazon. He'd bypassed a largely skeptical media to appeal directly to regular people, only slightly bruising the facts in the process. Just as he'd outmaneuvered countless rivals, he intuitively sensed what AMI's vulnerabilities were-and surgically attacked them. The entrepreneur who'd already commandeered the business of selling books, then much of retail, plus cloud computing, Hollywood, home speakers, and so on now asserted dominance over that unlikeliest of sectors-the celebrity media game.
Pecker blamed Howard for the disaster and removed him from his editorial role at AMI; Howard left the company in April 2020 when his contract expired. In two separate defamation lawsuits in L.A. district court, Michael sued AMI as well as Bezos and de Becker. He lost almost every subsequent legal decision as the facts dribbled out. And in the Southern District of New York, federal prosecutors investigated Bezos' allegation, leveled in the Medium essay, that he was extorted by AMI after it published the Enquirer article. The evidence must have been lacking, though, because prosecutors quietly dropped the matter without ever bringing a case.
Undeterred, Bezos and Lauren started appearing together in public. Before the pandemic, they attended the Allen & Co. investor conference in Sun Valley, Idaho, mingling with Warren Buffett, Tim Cook, and Mark Zuckerberg. A few days later, they watched the Wimbledon men's finals from the royal box, three rows behind Prince William and Kate Middleton. In August 2019, they were on David Geffen's superyacht. And in October, Bezos turned up outside the former Saudi consulate in Istanbul to commemorate the one-year anniversary of the murder of Khashoggi. De Becker handled the intricate security arrangements. Bezos sat next to Hatice Cengiz, Khashoggi's fiancee, and embraced her during the ceremony.
As such dramatic gestures replaced the scandal in the collective memory, Amazon employees could only watch and wonder: Did their CEO still belong to them or to some alternate dimension of wealth, glamour, and intrigue? Bezos seemed to show up just as frequently in the press as in the office, buying historic works of art and snapping up Geffen's 9-acre Beverly Hills estate for $165 million, a California record. Bezos now had personal and professional ambitions beyond Amazon. That turning point became evident in February, when the company announced that its founder would become executive chairman and hand over the CEO reins to Andy Jassy, a longtime deputy who'd overseen the profitable rise of Amazon Web Services. Before the transition, Bezos recorded yet another triumph, over the union trying to organize workers at an Amazon fulfillment center in Bessemer, Ala.
Employees now had even more reasons to wonder. What did the future hold for their founder? At least part of the answer to that could be found in the shipyards of the Dutch custom yacht builder Oceanco. There, outside Rotterdam, a new creation was secretly taking shape: a 127-meter-long, three-mast schooner about which practically nothing was known, even in the whispering confines of luxury boat builders-except that upon completion, it will be one of the finest sailing yachts in existence. Oceanco was also building Bezos an accompanying support yacht, which had been expressly commissioned and designed to include-you guessed it-a helipad.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
 
 
source <a href="https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/how-jeff-bezos-trumped-tabloids-a-story-of-money-sex-and-power-2428608">https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/how-jeff-bezos-trumped-tabloids-a-story-of-money-sex-and-power-2428608</a>

news world How Jeff Bezos Trumped Tabloids: A Story of Money, Sex And Power

For years, Bezos wove the story of his courtship and marriage to MacKenzie Bezos into his public persona. "Raise your hand if you t...

French Journalist Kidnapped By Jihadists In Mali Appears In Video

<div class="ins_instory_dv">
<div class="ins_instory_dv_cont"><img alt="French Journalist Kidnapped By Jihadists In Mali Appears In Video" src="https://c.ndtvimg.com/2021-05/c3jal4s4_french-journalist-kidnapped-mali_625x300_05_May_21.jpg" title="French Journalist Kidnapped By Jihadists In Mali Appears In Video" /></div>
Olivier Dubois worked for several media, including France 24 and Liberation daily.
</div>
Bamako, Mali:
A French journalist, in a video circulating on social media Wednesday, said he had been kidnapped in Mali in early April by a jihadist group with links to Al-Qaeda.
The brief video could not be independently verified, although an official at the French foreign ministry confirmed that Olivier Dubois, who worked for several media, including the international TV channel France 24 and Liberation daily, was missing.
In the video, which lasts about 20 seconds, Dubois said he was abducted on April 8 in the central region of Gao by the Group to Support Islam and Muslims (GSIM), the biggest jihadist alliance in the Sahel.
He is seen seated on the ground, on a green sheet that could be a tent, dressed in a light pink traditional gown, with his beard trimmed.
The foreign ministry official said, "We are in contact with his family and the Malian authorities. We are carrying out the usual technical verifications" of the video.
Liberation, for which Dubois had been writing regularly since April last year, declined to make any immediate comment.
Mali has been struggling to contain an Islamist insurgency which first broke out in the north of the country in 2012 before spreading to the centre and neighbouring Burkina Faso and Niger.
Thousands of people have been killed and hundreds of thousands have fled their homes, while the economic impact on one of the world's poorest countries has been devastating.
Abductions have been frequent, both of Malians and foreigners.
The last French hostage was Sophie Petronin, a 75-year-old aid worker, who was freed in October last year along with Malian politician Soumaila Cisse, who has since died, and Italians Nicola Chiacchio and Pier Luigi Maccalli.
There has been consistent speculation that a ransom was paid for the four hostages, something that has never been confirmed by the Malian government, along with the release of 200 prisoners, some of whom were jihadists.
In October, Switzerland was informed that the GSIM had killed an evangelical missionary who had been kidnapped in Timbuktu in January 2016.
In March, the Swiss foreign ministry said the woman's body had been recovered and formally identified.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
 
 
source <a href="https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/french-journalist-olivier-dubois-kidnapped-by-jihadists-in-mali-appears-in-video-2428560">https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/french-journalist-olivier-dubois-kidnapped-by-jihadists-in-mali-appears-in-video-2428560</a>

news world French Journalist Kidnapped By Jihadists In Mali Appears In Video

Olivier Dubois worked for several media, including France 24 and Liberation daily. Bamako, Mali: A French journalist, in a video circul...

New Zealand Prime Minister Plans Summer Wedding: Report

<div class="ins_instory_dv">
<div class="ins_instory_dv_cont"><img alt="New Zealand Prime Minister Plans Summer Wedding: Report" src="https://c.ndtvimg.com/2020-10/7dreccq_-jacinda-ardern-650_625x300_05_October_20.jpg" title="New Zealand Prime Minister Plans Summer Wedding: Report" /></div>
Jacinda Ardern, got engaged to Clarke Gayford, during the Easter holidays in 2019 . (File)
</div>
Sydney:
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern plans to get married during summer but did not disclose the date, local media reported on Wednesday.
Ardern told Coast Radio that she and her partner television host Clarke Gayford have "finally got a date" for the wedding, New Zealand Herald said in a report.
"That doesn't mean we've told anyone yet, so I feel like we should probably put some invites out," Ardern was quoted as saying by the report.
Ardern, 40, got engaged to Gayford, 44, during the Easter holidays in 2019 and they have a two-year-old daughter.
The wedding being planned in summer, which runs from December to February in the southern hemisphere, might not be celebrated in the traditional way as Ardern admitted she "feels a bit too old to have a bridal party", media reports quoted her as saying.
There is "nothing further to add over what has been reported this morning", a spokesman in the prime minister's office told Reuters.
Ardern became New Zealand's youngest prime minister when she took office in 2017 and is one of the few elected leaders to hold office while pregnant.
She returned to power last October delivering the biggest election victory for her centre-left Labour Party in half a century largely due to her government's decisive response to contain the COVID-19 outbreak.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
 
 
source <a href="https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/new-zealand-prime-minister-jacinda-ardern-plans-summer-wedding-report-2428519">https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/new-zealand-prime-minister-jacinda-ardern-plans-summer-wedding-report-2428519</a>

news world New Zealand Prime Minister Plans Summer Wedding: Report

Jacinda Ardern, got engaged to Clarke Gayford, during the Easter holidays in 2019 . (File) Sydney: New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda A...

Australian Court To Examine India Travel Ban; Plea By Man In Bengaluru

<div class="ins_instory_dv">
<div class="ins_instory_dv_cont"><img alt="Australian Court To Examine India Travel Ban; Plea By Man In Bengaluru" src="https://c.ndtvimg.com/2021-05/c7fj4j18_scott-morrison-afp_625x300_04_May_21.jpg" title="Australian Court To Examine India Travel Ban; Plea By Man In Bengaluru" /></div>
Scott Morrison this week banned arrivals from India, which is recording thousands of new cases. (File)
</div>
Sydney:
An Australian court on Wednesday agreed to hear a challenge to the country's controversial ban on citizens returning home from coronavirus-hit India.
A federal court said it would urgently hear a case brought by a 73-year-old man living in Bangalore who wishes to return.
Prime Minister Scott Morrison this week banned arrivals from India, which is recording hundreds of thousands of new coronavirus infections each day.
Under the measures, Australian citizens who return home face jail time and heavy fines.
The move has caused widespread outrage, with Morrison's own allies describing it as racist and an abandonment of vulnerable Australians overseas.
The conservative government has argued the ban is necessary to prevent Australia's quarantine facilities from being overwhelmed with Covid-positive arrivals.
Christopher Ward, the lawyer representing the 73-year-old man, said his client was challenging the ban on several grounds of constitutionality, "proportionality and reasonableness".
Justice Stephen Burley ordered that a further hearing date would be set in the next 24 to 48 hours.
Australia has no widespread community transmission of Covid-19, but has seen several outbreaks emerge from hotel quarantine facilities, causing disruptive city lockdowns.
There are estimated to be around 9,000 Australian citizens in India, including high-profile cricketers playing the now-suspended Indian Premier League.
Morrison on Tuesday refused to amend the ban but insisted it was "highly unlikely" the punishment would ever be meted out.
The ban is currently scheduled to run until May 15.
Monash University constitutional law professor Luke Beck predicted it would be difficult for the challenge to succeed, and even a temporary injunction is unlikely.
"The Australian constitution doesn't set out very many rights that individuals have," he told AFP, adding that there is no explicit right to return home.
The challenge may be trying to convince the court that the measures are disproportionate to the threat, but "judges tend to side with the government's public health expert", he said.
"It's quite unlikely that this challenge will succeed."
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
 
 
source <a href="https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/australian-court-to-examine-contentious-travel-ban-from-covid-hit-india-2428403">https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/australian-court-to-examine-contentious-travel-ban-from-covid-hit-india-2428403</a>

news world Australian Court To Examine India Travel Ban; Plea By Man In Bengaluru

Scott Morrison this week banned arrivals from India, which is recording thousands of new cases. (File) Sydney: An Australian court on W...

Biden Tax Rule Would Rip Billions From Big Fortunes At Death

<div class="ins_instory_dv">
<div class="ins_instory_dv_cont"><img alt="Biden Tax Rule Would Rip Billions From Big Fortunes At Death" src="https://c.ndtvimg.com/2021-05/19g7s2p_jeff-bezos-bloomberg_625x300_05_May_21.jpg" title="Biden Tax Rule Would Rip Billions From Big Fortunes At Death" /></div>
The Amazon.com Inc. founder's heirs may have to pay more than $36 billion.
</div>
Jeff Bezos has an ex-wife, a girlfriend, four children and billions of reasons to watch whether Joe Biden's tax overhaul wins congressional approval.
The Amazon.com Inc. founder's heirs may have to pay more than $36 billion if the president succeeds in closing a loophole that helps the rich transfer much of their fortunes tax-free at death.
Under current rules, whoever inherits the Amazon shares Bezos bought in 1994 for $10,000, worth $180 billion today, will receive a so-called step-up in basis, wiping out any capital gains tax liability. Biden's plan would close that loophole and apply the top capital gains tax immediately when assets transfer to wealthy heirs. If the rate increases -- it's 20% for holdings like Bezos's, and Biden has called for boosting it to 39.6% -- the eventual tax bill would too.
For Bill and Melinda Gates, who announced on Monday that they would be divorcing, a change in the step-up rule might be less costly. The Gates fortune, valued at $145.8 billion, is older, and they've already sold or donated much of their stake in Microsoft Corp. But $26 billion of Microsoft shares remain, and it isn't clear how the couple will manage their assets in a split.
Congress estimates that stepping up the tax basis of inherited assets costs the government about $43 billion a year. Ending that practice and raising the rate would amount to the biggest curb on dynastic wealth in decades, altering an American economic landscape dominated by a few wealthy families. An Amazon spokesman didn't respond to emailed questions about Bezos's shares.
The proposals are far from becoming law, even though Democrats control both houses of Congress, as they threaten wealthy donors to both political parties who have lobbied against them. But proponents say getting rid of the step-up rule, known to estate planners as the Angel of Death loophole, is crucial to achieving Biden's vision of tax fairness. Otherwise, economists project that the proposed increase in the top capital gains tax rate would further encourage holding assets until death, decreasing revenue for the Treasury.
The step-up rule allows investors to pass on assets to heirs virtually tax-free, raising the taxable value of a property to its fair market value at the time it is inherited. A beneficiary who inherits a house worth $1 million purchased for $100,000 two decades earlier would have no capital gains. If she later sells for $1.5 million, she only pays tax on $500,000. The rule also applies to Amazon shares, which have risen more than 200,000% since a 1997 public offering, as well as other appreciated assets.
The Joint Committee on Taxation, a nonpartisan arm of Congress, estimates that untaxed capital gains on inherited assets run into the hundreds of billions of dollars a year. About half of unrealized gains belong to the wealthiest 1%, according to an analysis of data in the Federal Reserve Board's Survey of Consumer Finances. And unrealized and accrued capital gains account for about 40% of the wealth of the top 1%, the Fed data show.
The step-up rule has been criticized as a government-subsidized engine for amassing dynastic fortunes and a cause for widening economic inequality. Even some prominent estate planners say the provision -- enacted a century ago to avoid double taxation at a time when the estate tax had few exemptions -- has outlived that original purpose.
Billionaires' lawyers have developed sophisticated strategies to avoid the estate tax, making the step-up allowance an unalloyed boon. "It's an enormous loophole," said Jonathan Blattmachr, a trusts and estates lawyer and senior adviser at Pioneer Wealth Partners, a financial advisory firm for high-net-worth clients and family offices.
Republicans and some business organizations have criticized the Biden proposal. A study by Ernst & Young commissioned by the Family Business Estate Tax Coalition predicted that eliminating the step-up rule could cost tens of thousands of jobs a year and cut $10 billion from annual gross domestic product.
Opponents of the plan say the burden would largely be avoided by the ultra-wealthy, who can afford sophisticated estate planning, and fall instead on small businesses and family farms, which might have to be sold to pay tax bills.
"Repealing step-up could have a dramatic impact on small manufacturers across the country, potentially requiring families to liquidate businesses, leverage assets, or lay off employees to cover the tax hit," said Chris Netram, vice president of tax and domestic economic policy at the National Association of Manufacturers, which supported President Donald Trump's 2017 tax cuts.
Biden's plan addressed some of those concerns by sparing the first $1 million in inherited appreciated assets from capital gains taxes and by exempting family farms and small businesses in cases where heirs continue to operate them.
The plan has been cheered by progressives, who have long called for an end to the preferential treatment given to capital gains. Frank Clemente, executive director of Americans for Tax Fairness, an advocacy group allied with labor unions, said the gap between taxes on labor and capital is fundamentally unfair and the administration's plan simply seeks to "tax wealth like work."
"Our two-tier tax code, with one code for working-class Americans, and another full of special breaks for the people at the very top, has destroyed public confidence in our tax structure that must be fixed," said New Jersey Democrat Bill Pascrell, chairman of the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Oversight. "This loophole is one of the chief causes of a broken system."
A version of Biden's plan was floated by President Barack Obama in 2015, but it died in a Republican-controlled Congress.
Any substantial change to the step-up rule could upend financial planning for America's richest families, including the techniques they use to avoid incurring capital gains for decades.
"To the extent to which there is ability to work around the policy, that's in large part a policy choice," said Chye-Ching Huang, executive director of the Tax Law Center at New York University School of Law. "There are ways to draft and implement it so it doesn't allow for large, inefficient tax shelters."
<div class="ins_instory_dv">
<div class="ins_instory_dv_cont"><img alt="vap096ao" class="lozad" src="https://c.ndtvimg.com/2021-05/vap096ao_larry-ellison-bloomberg_625x300_05_May_21.jpg" /></div>
Larry Ellison, co-founder and chairman of Oracle Corp., speaks during the Oracle OpenWorld 2017 conference in San Francisco, California, U.S., on Tuesday, Oct. 3, 2017. Oracle plans to pay its leaders more than $100 million each in fiscal 2018, an increase of about 150 percent, as it rips a page from Tesla Inc.'s playbook to change its executive-compensation practices in response to investor complaints.
</div>
Currently, wealthy people who need cash can take out loans using stock as collateral, rather than selling shares, which would trigger a tax bill. The technique allows billionaires to fund their lifestyles, then pass their assets to their heirs without ever realizing capital gains.
Larry Ellison, the founder of Oracle Corp. who purchased Hawaii's sixth-largest island in 2012, had $17.5 billion of stock pledged to such loans as of September, figures in a company disclosure show. The strategy has also been used by Elon Musk, the world's second-richest person, and Sumner Redstone, the former chairman of Viacom Inc. who died in August. If the step-up rule changes, capital gains taxes on the assets of these billionaires would be triggered by death.
When Apple Inc. cofounder Steve Jobs died in 2011, his $10 billion fortune was relatively paltry compared with today's tech billionaires. But a step-up in basis proved valuable nonetheless.
Jobs' biggest holding was in Walt Disney Co., which gave him shares in connection with its 2006 purchase of Pixar, the animation studio Jobs had bought from filmmaker George Lucas two decades earlier. By the time Jobs died, his Disney shares were worth $4.5 billion, and his shares of Apple, stemming from a 2003 stock grant, were worth about $2.1 billion.
Between the two holdings, there were at least $5 billion of untaxed capital gains at the time of his death, meaning the step-up in basis could have saved his family more than $750 million in taxes, a review of corporate filings shows. Jobs' fortune passed to his wife Laurene Powell Jobs, whose wealth has since swelled to $22 billion, making her the world's 80th richest person, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.
A spokesperson for Laurene Powell Jobs, who would have inherited any Apple shares at a stepped-up price, didn't respond to a request for comment.
The nation's wealthiest families have spent millions of dollars lobbying Congress in recent years to blunt attempts to increase taxes on inherited wealth, and those efforts have often paid off.
Members of the Mars family, who built an empire on candy and pet care, helped lead the fight against the estate tax during George W. Bush's presidency and have lobbied against efforts to increase taxes on inherited wealth since, according to congressional records.
When Forrest Mars Jr. died in 2016, he left his heirs a fortune worth more than $25 billion. Today, six family members are among the world's 500 richest people, according to the Bloomberg index, sharing a combined fortune of more than $130 billion. A spokesperson for the Mars family declined to comment.
Administration officials say retaining the step-up rule would undermine the effort to raise more revenue from the wealthy through higher taxes on investment income.
An estimate released by the Penn Wharton Budget Model, a nonpartisan fiscal policy research group at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, last week found that raising the top capital gains rate to 39.6% would raise $113 billion in new revenue over the next decade -- but only if the step-up in basis is severely restricted. If the policy remains unchanged, raising the capital gains rate would motivate more wealthy people to avoid selling assets before their deaths, costing the Treasury $33 billion in lost revenue over 10 years, the study found.
Another study published in January by the National Bureau of Economic Research says an increase in the top capital gains rate could generate more revenue than Congress estimates because asset owners have less flexibility on when to realize gains. Eliminating step-up in basis would further decrease flexibility, the study said.
"You're telling me that if I effectively doubled the rate and make death a realization event that you're not going to get much money from it?" said Owen Zidar, a professor of economics and public policy at Princeton University and one of the study's authors. "I find that hard to believe."
But even if Biden's plan is adopted, tax lawyers and accountants will likely find ways to increase flexibility by using charitable donations and novel estate planning strategies.
"The story of taxing rich people throughout history is that they will always find ways to sidestep taxes," said John Ricco, author of the Wharton study. "This will certainly narrow the avoidance opportunities -- perhaps not as much as the proponents of the Biden proposal hope, but it will have some bite to it."
(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
 
 
source <a href="https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/how-joe-bidens-tax-plan-will-impact-billionaires-like-jeff-bezos-bill-gates-2428257">https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/how-joe-bidens-tax-plan-will-impact-billionaires-like-jeff-bezos-bill-gates-2428257</a>