The Germanic Nations Of Germany And Austria Are Rising Up And Want To Conquer All Of Europe, And They Will Ally With The Future Ottoman Empire To Destroy The Church

<p><strong>By & Walid Shoebat (Shoebat Sunday special)</strong></p><p class="p1"><strong><span class="s1">One of the most prevalent errors that has been going on for many decades, is the belief that we will never see a world war again. People said that there would be no major war before World War One, and there was one. People said that there would never be a world war again, and it happened again. Now people are saying the same thing today, only proving that truly history does rhyme, for before every world war, there are the do gooders saying that peace will prevail. As the Apostle said: </span></strong></p><blockquote><p><strong><sup class="versenum"> </sup>For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them (1 Thessalonians 5:3)</strong></p></blockquote><p><strong>Austria just had its general election, and it was a victory for the fascists. The forces that will bring humanity to another world war, and another mass genocide, are gaining power. Few know that Pope Pius XII predicted that World War II would happen again (more on that later). Both the party that took first place in Austria, the <em>Austrian People's Party</em>, and the party that took second place in Austria, <em>the Freedom Party</em>, have major Nazi roots. </strong></p><p><strong>And while the fools praise this and proclaim that this is 'a victory against Islam,' what they never care to find out is that such entities will only become agents for the revived Ottoman Empire. Dark days are coming, and we are beginning to see the forming of the next world war. </strong></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Austria’s parliamentary elections just took place, with the <i>Austrian People’s Party</i> taking first place, the far-right <i>Freedom Party</i> taking second place, and the center left Social Democrats taking third. The leader of the Austrian People’s Party, Sebastian Kurz, is already being projected as the next chancellor of Austria. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Fifty-eight percent of Austrians who voted, cast their vote for either the Austrian People’s Party or the Freedom Party. This is a huge shift, reflecting the dramatic change of the political climate in Austria, and, the continent of Europe.</span></p><div id="attachment_114523" style="width: 516px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/99876942_Sebastian_Kurz_FOREIGN-xlarge_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqWqpbAtgKJyHaMBh-yZTXbcqYQBFhFDyVg3lDSboLEtY-1.jpg"><img alt="" class="wp-image-114523" height="316" sizes="(max-width: 506px) 100vw, 506px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/99876942_Sebastian_Kurz_FOREIGN-xlarge_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqWqpbAtgKJyHaMBh-yZTXbcqYQBFhFDyVg3lDSboLEtY-1-1024x640.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/99876942_Sebastian_Kurz_FOREIGN-xlarge_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqWqpbAtgKJyHaMBh-yZTXbcqYQBFhFDyVg3lDSboLEtY-1-1024x640.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/99876942_Sebastian_Kurz_FOREIGN-xlarge_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqWqpbAtgKJyHaMBh-yZTXbcqYQBFhFDyVg3lDSboLEtY-1-300x188.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/99876942_Sebastian_Kurz_FOREIGN-xlarge_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqWqpbAtgKJyHaMBh-yZTXbcqYQBFhFDyVg3lDSboLEtY-1-768x480.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/99876942_Sebastian_Kurz_FOREIGN-xlarge_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqWqpbAtgKJyHaMBh-yZTXbcqYQBFhFDyVg3lDSboLEtY-1.jpg 1280w" width="506" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Sebastian Kurz</p></div><p class="p1"><span class="s1">The catalyst by which this shift commenced was the so-called migration crises. As the New York Times <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/16/world/europe/austria-election-right.html">reported</a>, “the theme of the election was identity — anti-immigration and anti-Islamization”. The migration crises led to this political victory for the right-wing in Europe. The liberals support for more migration sparked a violent reaction from the people, and this is evidenced in their vote for nationalist parties. You may think this is good, but the reality is that the migration crises was started by governments, Germany and Turkey, for the cause of societal manipulation, to get people to accept despotism, eugenics and genocidal ideologies under the guise of national security. Ivan Krastev, a political scientist in Vienna, wrote:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1"> “The resistance of liberals to conceding any negative effects of migration has triggered the anti-establishment (and particularly anti-mainstream media) reaction that is convulsing political life” </span></p></blockquote><p>Why is this important? Because both of the parties that dominated the Austrian general election, the Austrian People's Party and the Freedom Party, are rooted in Nazism. And both parties are working for the rise of Germanic militarism. Lets remember that it was Austria, and not Germany, that spawned Hitler. This should be of great concern to humanity.</p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">And if one thinks that Nazism is simply history, the party that took first place was the Austrian People’s Party, the same party was once led by Kurt Waldheim, a major SS Nazi officer who served the Third Reich, who led a successful presidential campaign in the 1980s, and who served as Secretary General of the United Nations from 1972 to 1982.</span></p><div id="attachment_114524" style="width: 397px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/kurt-waldheim-9521732-1-402.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-114524" height="387" sizes="(max-width: 387px) 100vw, 387px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/kurt-waldheim-9521732-1-402-1024x1024.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/kurt-waldheim-9521732-1-402-1024x1024.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/kurt-waldheim-9521732-1-402-150x150.jpg 150w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/kurt-waldheim-9521732-1-402-300x300.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/kurt-waldheim-9521732-1-402-768x768.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/kurt-waldheim-9521732-1-402.jpg 1200w" width="387" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Kurt Waldheim</p></div><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Eli M. Rosenbaum, the principal deputy director of the Justice Department's Office of Special Investigations, which prosecuted suspected Nazi war criminals, obtained documents that revealed the Nazi past of Waldheim. The documents showed that Waldheim served the "Prince Eugen" division of the Waffen-SS, "perhaps the most notorious of all of Hitler's Waffen-SS units." This same Waffen-SS had numerous Muslim divisions as well. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">In 1986, when Waldheim was running for president in Austria, John Tagliabue, a foreign correspondent for The New York Times, wrote an article exposing the Nazi activities of Waldheim. The story made it on the front page and was distributed all over the Austrian press. But, the Austrians did not care, and <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/16/world/europe/austria-election-right.html"><span class="s2">even voted</span></a> Waldheim into office. If Austrians then were willing to vote in a leader of the SS, then today is no different, and still they are willing to vote in politicians whose parties are rooted in Nazi ideology. Many Austrians even got upset with the World Jewish Congress, an organization that led the investigation on Waldheim, even condemning the group and accusing them of an international conspiracy against their president. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">For example, when it came out that Waldheim served as an SS officer in Croatia, the Austrian newspaper, <i>Wochenpresse</i>, played the fact down by saying that his medals were not that significant and that he was merely given a position in an intelligence branch. Rosenbaum responded by <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/10/books/waldheim-and-his-protectors.html?pagewanted=all"><span class="s2">writing</span></a>:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">"Waldheim was not merely 'assigned' to the Intelligence/Counterintelligence Branch; one could properly infer that he was the primary aide to the chief of intelligence for all of Army Group E, a force of more than 400,000 troops having dominion over nearly the entire Balkans." </span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Waldheim sentenced entire villages to destruction. In Christian Orthodox Crete he chose two villages, Iraklion and Karpenission, as worthy of destruction. Waldheim was also behind the mass deportation of thousands of Greek Jews to Auschwitz, where most were exterminated. Waldheim himself ordered a group of British commandos to be executed. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">That Austrians are voting for a party a past leader of whom was a Nazi mass murderer, should tell us that the beast of Nazism never died, but it only masqueraded itself under the guise of modern politics, and its rising back up. </span></p><p>Pope Pius XII, in 1943, predicted that after World War Two there would be talk of peace in a new world order, but that such would not last, and what took place in the Second World War would happen again:</p><blockquote><p>"But perhaps it is time to turn our eyes to the future, instead of the past; what lies before us? Those who hold the fate of kingdoms in their hands assure us that, once the bloodthirsty discords of the present moment have been laid aside, they will introduce a new order of things, based on a foundation of justice and economic settlement. But is it really to be different, is it really to be (what is more important) a better and happier age? At the end of this war there will be fresh pacts, fresh arrangement of international relations. They will be conceived in a spirit of justice and fairness all round, in a spirit of reconstruction and peace, or will they disastrously repeat our old and our recent failures? Experience shews it is but an empty dream to expect a real settlement to emerge at the moment when the conflagration of war has died down." (Pope Pius XII, Darkness over the Earth, ch. v)</p></blockquote><div id="attachment_114546" style="width: 604px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/PA-8654211-800x500.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-114546" height="371" sizes="(max-width: 594px) 100vw, 594px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/PA-8654211-800x500.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/PA-8654211-800x500.jpg 800w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/PA-8654211-800x500-300x188.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/PA-8654211-800x500-768x480.jpg 768w" width="594" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Pope Pius XII</p></div><p>Pius XII was accurate to a tee. For one, he said that the postwar world will "introduce a new order of things". This is reminiscent to what President Bush Sr. did when he introduced his "new world order" of peace:</p><p><span class="embed-youtube" style="text-align:center; display: block;"><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/byxeOG_pZ1o?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe></span></p><p>Pius XII also foresaw that there will be peace through "economic settlement", and we see this in the project of unifying Europe under the Euro with the hopes of maintaining peace and preventing conflict. But, the EU and its Euro project is destabilizing, and this will bring in an occasion for conflict. Yanis Varofakis, the former financial minister of Greece, warned that if the Euro fragments, it will cause a hostile division between the Germanic northern Europe and the more Mediterranean Southern Europe:</p><blockquote><p class="p1">“Do you know what will happen if the Euro fragments? We’re going to end up with a new Berlin wall, only this time it’ll be running down the Rhine and the Alps. There will be a division of Europe, between a Germanic part, east of the Rhine and north of the Alps.”</p></blockquote><p><span class="embed-youtube" style="text-align:center; display: block;"><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/md6_WfF9Ky0?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&start=3651&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe></span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">What happened in Austria’s general election is not an anomaly, but rather a result of an entire culture. Like a devil waiting for the moment to attack, this violent nationalism lingers about, waiting for the opportunity for its existence to be justified. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Money is not power, belief is power. Money is simply the means by which elites establish outlets of influence, belief is the fuel that leads their mobs, their masses and eventually, their armies. By allowing the migration crises to happen, it sparked a deep reinvigoration of nationalism. While the immigration problem can be controlled, what cannot be contained is the even worse reaction to it. </span></p><p>What is interesting is how Sebastian Kurz is working with a Turkish intellectual, Ednan Aslan, a professor at the University of Vienna, to further push the anti-migration craze in Austria. Aslan uses jargon that is no different that what one would hear coming out of the Counter-jihad movement. For example, Aslan <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.thelocal.at/20170125/austrian-expert-says-islam-is-unsustainable-in-its-current-form">says</a> that Islam is "out of touch with the present" in the way it is currently taught, and that:</p><blockquote><p>"We want to reshape the face of Islam. It is important that Islam is given a new face in order to be able to remain viable."</p></blockquote><p>Ednan Aslan, like the Young Turks in the first half of the twentieth century, wants a Europeanized Islam, saying:</p><blockquote><p>"Currently, Islam is unfortunately a religion of isolation. A religion of migration. A religion of Turkey, of Saudi Arabia. But no religion of Europe, which advocates pluralism or prepares children accordingly for a plural society."</p></blockquote><p>This is the same type of mentality as the Young Turks who ruled Turkey and the Ottoman Empire: create a modern Islam to adapt to the West. This is why the Young Turks did not mind believing in Darwinism, while at the same time promoting an Islamic society, even though Ataturk (a Young Turk himself) got rid of the caliphate and conditioned Turkey to European ways.</p><p>The Wahhabi form of Islam is not that deceptive; it explicitly states its desires. But the Young Turk type of Islam, or the one produced by the learned Ottomans, is much more appealing to Western minds: it embellishes the religion of Muhammad with mystical axioms and poetry, and fills its texts with Buddhist and gnostic sounding verses.</p><p>Europeanized Islam (an Islam whose followers will even openly criticize Islam) is attractive to the Western elitist mentality, not that it will necessarily gain converts, but that it will gain allies. This is <em>maruna</em> at its best.</p><p>The proponents of this ideology will advocate their imperialism, by dressing the Islamic calls of conquests under beautifully designed edifices and sophisticated literature, and its barbarities are mixed with Darwinism (the genocidal religion of the West), so as to make their desire to exterminate those they deem inferior as good science in the eyes of Europeans. This is the plan of Ednan Aslan, hence why he wants to create a "European brand of Islam".</p><p>This is the reason as to why Aslan is working with the right-wing, for by appealing to their Counter-jihad movement, the Turkish intellectual elite can then foster a coalition with Western nazis, thus continuing what has been taking place for centuries: the Germanic-Turkish alliance. German Protestants worked with the Ottoman Empire in the 16th century; when Germany became an official nation in 1871, it forged an alliance with the Ottoman Empire and fought as allies with the Turks during the First World War. Old patterns live on, and nations do not do things out of nowhere, but out of centuries of conditioning.</p><p>Earlier this year, Sebastian Kurz, as Austria's Foreign Minister, commissioned Ednan Aslan to create a study on Islamic kindergartens and how they were radicalizing Muslim children. The Austrian magazine, <em>Falter, </em>found documents that supposedly showed that Aslan and Kurz collaborated to deliberately manipulate the data to make the situation appear worse than what was found. Aslan <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/07/05/austria-muslim-kindergarten-study-reviewed-for-text-changes.html">stated</a> that he backs the report "to the last period." When the press began to talk about this story, Aslan defended Kurz by saying: ″Some people want to knock Sebastian Kurz off his pedestal″.</p><div id="attachment_114537" style="width: 740px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/aslan_kurz.jpg"><img alt="" class="size-full wp-image-114537" height="438" sizes="(max-width: 730px) 100vw, 730px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/aslan_kurz.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/aslan_kurz.jpg 730w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/aslan_kurz-300x180.jpg 300w" width="730" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Sebastian Kurz with Ednan Aslan</p></div><p>What Falter found was that, according to one <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.qantara.de/content/controversial-study-about-muslim-kindergartens-in-vienna-the-unwelcome-glare-of-publicity">German publication</a>,</p><blockquote><p>civil servants in the Ministry of Integration changed – with his knowledge – the content of the kindergarten study to suit Sebastian Kurz, minister for foreign affairs and integration.</p></blockquote><p>Whether or not what their study said was true is not the point. The point is that here we have the right-wing anti-Muslim immigration elites working with a member of the Turkish intelligentsia on fueling anti-migrant sentiment, and thus bolstering the position of the eugenists and nazis who are using the migration crises as a way to strengthen their position.</p><p>Turkey actually mistreats Muslim migrants terribly, putting them in camps where they are raped and pimped, and even shooting them as they try to cross the border into Turkey. So, Turkey hates the migrants just as much as the right-wing does. So it is not surprising that they are working together. Turkey and Germany are simply using them to generate a political shift in favor of militarism, which is what we are seeing now with Germany increasing its military spending and forging a pan-European army in the name of national security.</p><p>Anyone who would disagree at this point must then answer a Jesus-Style question: <em>Was it not Turkey who worked with Germany in bringing in the Islamic migrants?</em> It was all done to cause societal manipulation and a political shift.</p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">The destabilization of the Middle East, alongside the migrant crises, provided the perfect conditions to reinvigorate Germanic militarism, and it will be the Germanic militarists who will work with the revived Ottoman empire in the future. We saw an example of this in the recent German general election debate between politicians. In the debate, the German politician, Andreas Nick (whose party, the Christian Democrats, took the majority of the vote in Germany’s most recent general election) said that Germany must increase its military capacity and spend — instead of two percent — three percent of Germany’s GDP on the German military. But guess what he used to justify this: Terrorism from the Middle East and North Africa (where much of the migrants are coming from):</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1"> “I think what we should agree on is that in a world that has increasing security challenges where we are required to take more responsibility for our security, where we have to take more responsibility for stability in our immediate neighborhood in the Middle East, in Northern Africa, that we should provide our military with the means necessary so that they can do these missions with the best equipment possible. Wether that ultimately ends up to 2% is a statistical issue. I would like to broaden that perspective. We are talking about a 3% objective, including what we need to spend on development aid, on diplomacy, on other aspects of our integrated foreign policy. But in this regards, more responsibility in the security environment is an important factor.”</span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1"> <span class="Apple-converted-space">   </span></span></p><div id="attachment_114525" style="width: 514px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/andreas-nick-copy.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-114525" height="331" sizes="(max-width: 504px) 100vw, 504px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/andreas-nick-copy-1024x672.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/andreas-nick-copy-1024x672.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/andreas-nick-copy-300x197.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/andreas-nick-copy-768x504.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/andreas-nick-copy.jpg 1130w" width="504" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Andreas Nick</p></div><p class="p1"><span class="s1"><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span class="s1">Of course, Andreas Nick is weaseling his way into supporting German militarism, by bringing up the usual diplomatic talk about “aid” and “integrated foreign policy.” This deceptive talk clouds up what Mr. Nick is trying to say: Germany wants to control North Africa, and its using the migrant crises as a way to bolster its objective. This tricky language of Andreas Nick did not work with the debate’s moderator, Tim Sebastian, who immediately asked the German politician:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p3"><span class="s1">“So you want a bigger army, and that you think that helps you talk with a louder voice?”</span></p></blockquote><p class="p3"><span class="s1">Nick responded by saying that Germany needs to “improve European cooperation. As the chancellor [Angela Merkel] said … ‘We need to take more responsibility for our own destiny.’”</span></p><p><span class="embed-youtube" style="text-align:center; display: block;"><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/pq370-ORa9w?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&start=1028&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe></span></p><p class="p3"><span class="s1">Andreas Nick is referencing a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/05/29/angela-merkel-is-now-revealing-her-nazi-side-and-declares-the-days-of-relying-on-america-are-somewhat-over-we-europeans-must-take-our-destiny-into-our-own-hands-and-fight-for-our-future/"><span class="s3">statement</span></a> that Merkel made back in May, in which she said:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p3"><span class="s1">“the times in which we can fully count on others are somewhat over, as I have experienced in the past few days. …We Europeans must really take our destiny into our own hands.” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">All of this type of language is no different than what you hear coming out of the Alt-right and the Identitarian movement, with its push for nationalism and pan-Europeanism. “Take back our future” is a popular type of saying within the Alt-right or Identitarian circles. And yet here we have major German politicians saying the same thing, only this time they have the political leverage to actually carry out military enterprises. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">The Alt-right ideology, to put it plainly, is the simpler version of the same thing being pushed by major elites within European governments. The elites in the higher echelons of government advance their agenda with diplomatic language, whereas the Alt-right fanatics are more explicit. But, at the end of the day, they are the same.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>The Alt-right and the identitarians are simply the street activists for those <em>principalities in high places;</em> militarists and eugenists in the higher echelons of power, little demons doing the work for the bigger devils in the satanic hierarchy, for the cause of the greater conspiracy of genocide. The Alt-right and the Identitarians will likely just get absorbed by the elite establishment, but nonetheless, the evil objective will remain the same. Its like with the Islamic extremists groups, they eventually will get absorbed by the wealthier, more sophisticated ('moderate') and more powerful Islamic principalities, such as Turkey.  </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">There is something that goes beyond the pan-Europeanism that these people — both elite and regular activists — are promoting, and that is the ideology for an idea beyond Europe, for Eurasia, or the merging of Europe and Asia. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Why is all of this important? Because it ties into the greater plan of a Germanic-Turkic alliance. Austria wants to become a key military power, as does Germany, and both of these countries want to create alliances with Turkic and Asian countries as part of their envisioning of Eurasia, or the idea of making Europe and Asia a singular continent, at least in the ideological sense. Its pan-Asianism and pan-Europeanism combined (so much for " nationalism"). </span></p><p>There is a religious component to all this, one very ancient: Germanic paganism, and it is something warned about in the Bible, by Joel and Ezekiel who warn about a northern army, coming from Turkey and Northern Europe.</p><p>The patriarch of the Germanic peoples, Odin (or Wotan), who would be later mythologized, was a tribal leader who, according to the Scandinavian text, the<em> Prose Edda</em>, came from a region called <em>Turkland</em>, or Turkey. Odin, as the text reads, had "second sight," or prophetic powers, and believed that he was being called to migrate from Turkey to Northern Europe. The Prose Edda says:</p><blockquote><p>Odin had second sight, and his wife also; and from their foreknowledge he found that his name should be exalted in the <strong>northern part of the world</strong> and glorified above the fame of all other kings. Therefore, he made ready to journey out of <strong>Turkland</strong>, and was accompanied by a great multitude of people, young folk and old, men and women; and they had with them much goods of great price. And wherever they went over the lands of the earth, many glorious things were spoken of them, so that they were held more like gods than men. They made no end to their journeying till they were come north into the land that is now called Saxland [Germany]; there Odin tarried for a long space, and took the land into his own hand, far and wide.</p></blockquote><p>The text goes on to recount on how Odin travelled all the way to Sweden. The native people of that land, and their king, Gylfi, saw that Odin and his tribe were coming, and that they were a people from Asia called the <em>Æsir </em>or the "lords" or divine ones:</p><blockquote><p>"After that he went northward, where the land is called Sweden; the king there was named Gylfi. When the king learned of the coming of <strong>those men of Asia,</strong> who were called Æsir, he went to meet them, and made offer to them that Odin should have such power in his realm as he himself wielded."</p></blockquote><p>The text states that Odin governed <strong>"according to the customs of the Turks."</strong> That the text refers to Odin and his people as Asians from Turkey, and as being Æsir or masters, establishes a link between the Asians of Turkey and the Germanic peoples. It also shows how the Germanians saw themselves as a master race from Asia. The word Æsir actually is rooted in Asia, in Persia specifically, in the ancient Aryan detiy, Ahura Maza, in that it is rooted in the word <em>Ahura</em>, which means "godhood." So, the ancient Germanians considered themselves to be a divine race, just as the Nazis held themselves to be the master race.</p><p>St. Bede tells us that when the Saxons came from Germany to invade what is now called England, the first commanders to lead this invasion were Hengist and Horsa. These two, Bede <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.heroofcamelot.com/docs/Bede-Ecclesiastical-History.pdf">says</a>, "were the sons of Victgilsus, whose father was Vecta, son of Woden [Odin]; from whose stock the royal race of many provinces deduce their original." St. Bede explains that the pagans Saxons' "intentions were to enslave" the Britons, who were Catholics. The pagan Saxons were cruel and genocidal, and anytime the Germanians return to their pagan way, they will be on the warpath.</p><p>When the Germans elected the Nazis, it was at a time when paganism resurged. But it was not just Germanic paganism, but an interconnecting of Germanic paganism with the pagan religions of that continent from where Odin sojourned: Asia. Nazism was not just about pan-Europeanism, but pan-Eurasianism, or the merging of Europe and Asia, both historically and spiritually. Hence why, the symbol of the Nazis was the Swastika, a pagan image found throughout Asia, because the Nazis saw Germans as Indo-Aryans.</p><p>Alfred Rosenberg, the head ideologue for the Nazis, said that the Germanians were Atlanteans, and that these people settled throughout Europe, North Africa and Asia, and that their religions were the Aryan beliefs found in Hinduism and Zoroastrianism. In his most famous work, <em>The Myth of the Twentieth Century</em>, Rosenberg <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://aryanism.net/downloads/books/alfred-rosenberg/myth-of-the-twentieth-century.pdf">writes</a>:</p><blockquote><p>These currents of Atlantic men moved by water in their swan and dragon ships into the Mediterranean and to Africa; by land over central Asia to Kucha, perhaps even to China; over north Africa to the south of our own continent.</p><p>Ahura Mazda says to Zoroaster: 'Only once in the year does one see the rising and setting of stars and sun and moon; and the inhabitants hold to be a day, what is a year.' This must be for the Persian god of light a distant memory of the Nordic homeland, for only in the far north do day and night each last six months. The Mahabharata reports of the Indian hero, Arjuna, that during his visit to the mountain of Meru, the sun and moon daily passed around from left to right. Such an idea could never have originated in the tropical south, for only in the far north does the sun disc roll along the horizon.</p><p>...</p><p>Together with these primeval Aryan Atlantic memories appear those cult allegories, costumes, carvings which are understandable only in terms of Nordic origin. In predynastic Egypt, we find the Nordic boat with its swan neck and trefoil. But the rowers are the later ruling Amorites, already recognised by Sayce as fair skinned and blue eyed. They once traversed north Africa as strictly homogeneous hunter clans which gradually subdued the entire land.</p></blockquote><p>Rosenberg exhorted the German people to fight for both Odin and the Persian god, Ahura Mazda, writing:</p><blockquote><p>"Ahura Mazda, the eternal god of light, became a cosmic idea—the divine protector of Aryans everywhere. He had no special abode or temple like the gods of the orient and even of later Rome. He was simply the holy whiteness of perfection. His enemy is the dark Ahriman who is locked in struggle with him for world domination. This is a truly Nordic Aryan concept of Zoroaster. In this struggle, we must fight on the side of Ahura Mazda (just as the Einheriar in Valhalla [the heaven of the Vikings] would fight for Odin against the Fenris Wolf and the Midgard Serpent)."</p></blockquote><p>As the Germans looked to Asia for their diabolical thirst for pagan religion, and as they allied with the Sufi Islamic Ottomans in World War One, and the Shinto Buddhists of Japan in World War Two, so in the future the Germans will work with Turkey and the pagans of the land of the rising sun.</p><p>The prophet John writes of the coming of "the kings from the <em>rising of the sun</em>.” (Revelations 16:12, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.drbo.org/x/d?b=drb&bk=73&ch=16&l=12#x">Douay-Rheims) </a>This is speaking of Asia, as far as Japan, the nation that sees the sun rise first. After Japan defeated Russia in 1905, the Ottoman world looked to Japan in awe. One Ottoman publication spoke of the “rise of the East,” or an “awakening in Asia” that had been commenced and sparked by “the rising Sun [Japan].”<span class="Apple-converted-space">  </span></p><p>There is even today some signs of interest in connecting Germanic paganism with Hinduism by the German government.</p><p>In 2014, the Max Planck Institute, the scientific wing of the German government, came out with <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:2453407:2/component/escidoc:2453408/Proceedings7.pdf">a book</a> entitled, <em>Melammu: The Ancient World in an Age of Globalization. </em>The work was written by Jürgen Renn, the director of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, as well as other Max Planck Institute scholars.</p><div id="attachment_114540" style="width: 486px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Are_black_holes_real_5-copy.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-114540" height="272" sizes="(max-width: 476px) 100vw, 476px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Are_black_holes_real_5-copy.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Are_black_holes_real_5-copy.jpg 320w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Are_black_holes_real_5-copy-300x172.jpg 300w" width="476" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Jürgen Renn</p></div><p>The book compares Germanic mythology with Hindu texts, and speaks of "Parallels in Germanic, related not only typologically but also genealogically to the Indian ones," and then goes on to quote a Norse pagan verse: "Phol and Wodan were riding to the woods, when Balder’s foal sprained his foot." The book then compares this with the Hindu <em>Atharva Veda: </em>"What of thee is torn, what of thee is broken, (or what) of thee crushed— let Dhātar (put) it auspiciously put that together again, joint with joint."  The book then describes this Hindu text as "the best preserved parallel to the Germanic formula".</p><p>The Max Planck Institute (as <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/09/27/nazi-cult-in-germany-is-murdering-children-cutting-them-to-pieces-and-conducting-human-experiments-on-them-and-it-is-being-paid-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars-by-the-german-government-to-do-these/">we showed before</a>) is a Nazi eugenist institute which was directed by actual Nazi scientists after the war, and is conducting horrific experiments on children murdered in the human slaughterhouses that we call abortion clinics. Not only is the institute heavily involved in promoting eugenics, but paganism as well. The institute is not funded by some private entity, but by the German government itself. Why is the German state investing an interest in paganism? Because it is at war against God Himself. Remember what the Apostle teaches:</p><blockquote><p><sup class="versenum">"</sup>For our wrestling is not against flesh and blood; but against principalities and power, against the rulers of the world of this darkness, against the spirits of wickedness in the high places." (Ephesians 6:12)</p></blockquote><p>What the elites are teaching in conferences and in academic papers and books, the Alt-right, Identitarian and Counter-jihad outlets are teaching in much simpler ways. The intelligentsia teaches eugenics and paganism under the guise of science, but nationalists will say: 'we need eugenics and paganism to fight the Islamization of the West.' This is why its so important to understand this strategy of propaganda, because it is extremely deceptive. It takes a threat that is real (Islamic terrorism) and uses it to justify another evil. All heresy is the attacking on one evil to justify another evil.</p><p>This is why the Bible warns of these times in which such principalities will deceive <em>the very elect </em>(Matthew 24:24). This will be the times in which the savage masses will be carried by the tides of this world, even including the ones who think they are doing God a service.</p><p>The Alt-right neo-pagan, Stephen McNallen, says that the "Islamization" of Germany will usher in a return of Odin (or Wotan), and that this return will be manifested in a very violent reaction by the German people who will then return to the warpath. He describes the deity as the “Wotan archetype” that lives within the "volk" and “is the driving psychic dominant of Europe." He says:</p><blockquote><p class="p1">“the present day invasion of Germany by Middle Eastern immigrants, will only make Wotan’s return all the more dramatic.”</p></blockquote><p> </p><p><span class="embed-youtube" style="text-align:center; display: block;"><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/IyMFsWDKOa8?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&start=321&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe></span></p><p>This type of talk, using Islam as a way to justify paganism, was used by the Nazi thinker, Alfred Rosenberg, who wrote:</p><blockquote><p>Odin as the eternal mirrored image of the primal spiritual powers of Nordic man lives today just as he did over 5,000 years ago.</p></blockquote><p>While Rosenberg admires the Muslims of the Persian world, and praises the Young Turks for "the abolition of the Caliphate", he nonetheless expresses himself in ways akin to today's Counter-jihad movement, describing how the Al Akbar University in Egypt "trains a fanatical youth", and how:</p><blockquote><p>Everywhere that racial mixings take place in European colonies, Islam finds enthusiastic adherents among the mixed elements.   ... I say to you Europeans: be on your guard! ... Before this coming purified hatred of the Black races and bastards, led by the fanatical spirit of Mohammed, the white races have more than ever all cause to be on their guard.</p></blockquote><p>This really reveals that the view on Islam that the Nazis had was not so black and white. The Nazis admired really Turkish Islam, and praised the Young Turks for their genocide of the Armenians, while at the same time they had very negative views on the non-European Muslims, and as was the case with Rosenberg, a hatred for fundamentalist Islam itself.</p><div id="attachment_114541" style="width: 303px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/GERrosenberg2.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-114541" height="455" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/GERrosenberg2.jpg" width="293" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Alfred Rosenberg</p></div><p> </p><p>The words of Rosenberg would today tickle the ears of the Counter-jihad. But it was used for the cause of eugenics, just as the Counter-jihad movement today is using Islam to promote paganism, eugenics and homosexuality. We see this in the Alternative for Deutschland Party (AfD), the spawn of the Counter-jihad movement that took ninety-five seats in the German parliament in the most recent German general election. A leader of the AfD, Alice Weidel, made a victory speech after the election in which she boasted about how she is a lesbian and how 'homophobia' amongst migrants must end. Watch this lesbian go full Hitler over the fact that numerous migrants hate sodomites:</p><p><span class="embed-youtube" style="text-align:center; display: block;"><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/pvJ_ybwV40A?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&start=406&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe></span></p><p>The reverence of Sodom, and the desire to destroy all those who go against Sodom, this is the new Nazism. It is no wonder why God calls the realm of the antichrist, <em>Sodom and Egypt (</em>Revelation 11:8) For in Egypt, paganism abounded, and the neo-pagan movement links its religion to Egypt; and in Sodom, homosexuality abounded, and the entire armies against the Church uphold homosexuality.</p><p>The Nazis in the past, nonetheless, still turned to Asia to find their allies (in their case, Japan), and in our time we are seeing the beginning stages of the Germanic nations looking to Asia to find their allies.</p><p><span class="s1">In 2003, the Austrian general, Raimund Schittenhelm, gave a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.bundesheer.at/cms/artikel.php?ID=793"><span class="s2">presentation</span></a> in the State Defense Academy Heidelberg on the significance of Asia in Austrian geopolitics and globalization, in which he said:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">"It is to be expected that the world policy in this century will be strongly influenced by developments in Asia. The anthology should help to awaken awareness of developments in Asia and to understand the patterns of action and thought structures of Asian actors.”</span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Present in the event was Erich Reiter, an Austrian military specialist who is also a strong promoter of Eurasiansm, and he is a member of the far-right Freedom Party (which took second place in Austria’s general election). In the meeting, Reiter said this on the importance of Asia in geopolitics:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">"The great changes of the present are taking place in Asia, because the geopolitics, which are often declared dead, are currently gaining in importance again”</span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Another person at the event was Peter Hazdra, a member of the research institute of the National Defense Academy of the Austrian Armed Forces. </span></p><div id="attachment_114526" style="width: 584px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/asienpraesentation1.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-114526" height="404" sizes="(max-width: 574px) 100vw, 574px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/asienpraesentation1-1024x722.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/asienpraesentation1-1024x722.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/asienpraesentation1-300x212.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/asienpraesentation1-768x542.jpg 768w" width="574" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">(From left to right) Erich Reiter, General Raimund Schittenhelm, and Peter Hazdra</p></div><p class="p1"><span class="s1">In 2003, both Erich Reiter and Peter Hazdra edited a volume on European geopolitics, consisting of numerous essays on this subject, entitled, <i>The Impact of Asian Powers on Global Developments. </i>One of the essays presented is written by Rahul Peter Das, a professor at Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, and its entitled, <i>Europe in Eurasian Strategic Considerations: Introductory Remarks. </i></span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Das writes that Europe is becoming more and more irrelevant, while the focus on Asia is becoming greater. The United States, Das observes, is focusing more on Asia than it is on Europe, and that Asia is becoming more important politically and militarily. Das writes:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p3"><span class="s1">“Asia, particularly, is rapidly gaining importance in both the international political and military realms. Developments in this region will increasingly affect events at the global level, and thus also developments bearing on Europe. … Furthermore, the United States of America is intensifying its activities in Asia, and this nearly inevitably results in a weakening of its commitment to Europe. Europe, therefore, will more and more be left to its own resources in terms of its potential and its means of influencing global events. If Europe is not able to confront these challenges with effective measures, then it will be faced with the danger of marginalization in the sphere of political power.”</span></p></blockquote><div id="attachment_114527" style="width: 246px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/das.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-114527" height="295" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/das.jpg" width="236" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Rahul Peter Das</p></div><p class="p3"><span class="s1">This was written in 2003, when the Iraq War first erupted. This writing, and those like it, really show how the Europeans were planning, as far back as the Iraq conflict, how they were going to make themselves supreme in globalization. Notice what Das writes: that America is more and more ignoring Europe, and that Europe is going to have to make itself dominant. Is this not what we are seeing now, with Donald Trump and his administration arguing that Europe should be left to spend on its own defense without America’s help? This is exactly what is taking place, and the Germans are not sad about this, rather they are gleeful that they can rise up again, without America preventing them from doing this.</span></p><p class="p3"><span class="s1">Das advocates for a pan-European military foreign policy, writing that “there should also be a European foreign, security and defense policy.” Das focuses on Austria as central in this pan-European plan, writing that: “in 2001 Austria formulated a security and defense doctrine that proceeds from a common European security situation and regarded as a paradigm change within the country.” </span></p><p class="p3"><span class="s1">That Das describes Austria’s military plan as a “paradigm change” indicates a shift in the political climate of the Germanic nations in Europe. While the masses have a warped and shortsighted view that Germanic militarism will never return, the shift in favor of militarism in the Germanic powers of Germany and Austria already began decades ago, and were still strongly lodged in the soul of Germany after the Second World War. </span></p><p class="p3"><span class="s1">In 1997, Erich Reiter, the Austrian military specialist and a member of the Freedom Party, stated that the idea of Austrian military neutrality is a myth perpetuated by “the political class,” and it goes against the national identity of the Austrian people. The reason that Austria has not been able to present itself as a major military power, Reiter wrote, is not because of some vague principle of neutrality, but simply that Austria was not in the position to build up a formidable force. As Reiter <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://books.google.com/books?id=npIWDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA58&lpg=PA58&dq=%E2%80%9CWhile+the+political+class+of+Austria+started+to+internalize%22&source=bl&ots=A0ShA6oWzt&sig=ci9uswEKT1LokFAw_qMZtOadeUk&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi_96_Q4IDXAhWi14MKHRlIBowQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=%E2%80%9CWhile%20the%20political%20class%20of%20Austria%20started%20to%20internalize%22&f=false">wrote</a>:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p3"><span class="s1">“While the political class of Austria started to internalize neutrality, thereby contributing to the fiction that this is an integral part of the national identity of the Austrians in general, from a perspective of political realism the country was not in a position to build up a credible military component of neutrality, as in the case of Switzerland.” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p3"><span class="s1">Reiter argues that the whole idea of Austrian neutrality only served Soviet interests, and thus Austria needs to build up a military to combat Russia. Its history repeating itself, with the Germanic-Russian conflict rising up again. </span></p><p class="p4"><span class="s1">In 1996, Jorg Haider, one of the most popular and influential former leaders of the Freedom Party, pushed the idea of Austria joining NATO. Haider used the very common anti-Russia paranoia that was quite intense to justify this idea, and stated that Austria was under “the sword of Damocles of a nuclear Holocaust”. Haider argued that now that the Soviet Union had died, Austria could be the bridge between Western Europe and former Soviet nations. Haider argued that for Austria to remain militarily neutral would be:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p3"><span class="s1">“a hinderance for the further stabilization of our east and middle European sphere. Whomever wants to live securely cannot assign himself the role of a marginal position at the eastern border of a European security strategy.”</span></p></blockquote><div id="attachment_114542" style="width: 588px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Jörg_Haider_04-09-2008.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-114542" height="387" sizes="(max-width: 578px) 100vw, 578px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Jörg_Haider_04-09-2008-1024x685.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Jörg_Haider_04-09-2008-1024x685.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Jörg_Haider_04-09-2008-300x201.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Jörg_Haider_04-09-2008-768x514.jpg 768w" width="578" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Jorg Haider</p></div><p class="p1"><span class="s1">What is behind this idea of Austria being a bridge between east and west? Its about Eurasianism, and ultimately, really, its about domination. In the First World War, Austria was the head of an empire, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, over which the Austrians jointly ruled with the Magyars, a Turkic race of people who governed Hungary. Hungarians are Magyars; a people of both Slavic and Turkic origins. Thus, the idea of Austria wanting to be a bridge between Eastern and Western Europe is really part of a Eurasian conspiracy to revive the Austro-Hungarian empire. Hungary is considered not just European, but Eurasian, on account of its European and Asian roots. The aspiration of creating Eurasia would thus involve Hungary playing a central role on account of its position as being both Asiatic and European. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Within the pan-Europeanist establishment, there is a push for a united Europe, or a complete Europe which would include countries that would be considered parts of Eurasia, such as the Ural mountains which encompasses </span><span class="s4">northern, southern and </span><span class="s1">western Russia</span><span class="s4">, the coast of the Arctic Ocean all the way to the Ural River and northwestern Kazakstan. </span></p><p><span class="s1">Andreas Molzer, a pan-German and leading member of Austria’s Freedom Party, and also a former member of the European parliament, alluded to this desire when he said that the recreation of Europe “from the Atlantic to the Urals would be desirable but is not possible at the moment”. Marine Le Pen also reflected this aspiration, stating:</span></p><blockquote><p>“We are wrongly accused of being anti-Europe, but we are for (a Europe) that stretches from the Atlantic to the Urals, not from Washington to Brussels"</p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">In one essay, entitled, <i>New Global Politics</i>, Erich Reiter writes of the idea that whoever controls Eurasia, controls the future of the world, thus revealing the objective of global domination in the plan of Eurasia:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“These are theories, and Nicholas Spykman, for instance, who carried MacKinder’s analysis further, formulated that whoever controls the Eurasian rimland rules Eurasia, and whoever rules Eurasia controls the destiny of the world.” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Reiter affirms the geopolitical significance of controlling Central Asia, stating:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Control over Center Asia is still of geopolitical importance, although the need for continued Western emphasis on the Eurasian heartland has decreased because of the regained independence of many countries in the heartland. In the longer run, the geopolitical importance of this area could increase because the Eurasian rimland still abounds in potential threats to world order. Thus, Central Asia cannot be disregarded with respect to current geopolitical situations.” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">The aspiration of Eurasia, or a pan-European and pan-Asian coalition, will bring mankind into another world war. How is this? Eurasianism was made possible on account of the fall of the Soviet Union. Before this took place, Europe and Central Asia were dominated by two powers: the United States and the Soviet Union. With the fall of the Soviet Union, and with the United States withdrawing from West Germany and facilitating the fall of the Berlin Wall, Europe and Central Asia became ruled by multiple states. With numerous countries being sovereign, and with the absence of the Soviet Union and the lack of more American control, it opened the door for past tensions to be pushed. </span></p><p>We believe that we need to adjust our previous interpretations on prophecy. These nations of Central Asia and southern Russia, alongside the Germanic hoards, are what the prophet Ezekiel, under inspired pen warned about when he prophesied on: "Gog, the land of Magog, the chief prince of Mosoch and Thubal" and "Gomer, and all his bands, the house of Thogorma, <strong>the northern parts</strong> and all his strength, and many peoples with thee." (Ezekiel 38:2,6) The "northern parts" encompass much more. This is why St. Ambrose of Milan interpreted Gog to be the Goths.</p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">In the future, it will be remembered that one of the events that brought humanity to another world war, was the fall of the Berlin wall, which marked the fall of the Soviet Union, which only led to the independence of Islamic Central Asian countries and the reunification of Germany; such nations in the end will join the Ottoman empire in a coalition of evil. </span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">The reputable political scientist, John Mearsheimer, made a very interesting observation back in 1990, on how the fall of the Soviet Union will precipitate another war in Europe. Mearsheimer writes that before the end of the Cold War, Europe was ruled by the US and Russia, and since each of these superpowers had nuclear weapons, the threat of nuclear war prevented war between the two. With the fall of the Soviet Union came the independence of the nations that it ruled over. Thus Europe was no longer under the control of these duel powers, but now under multiple powers, and with a multiplicity of independent countries, comes nationalism, and with nationalism, comes war. As Mearsheimer writes: </span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“Most importantly, hyper-nationalism helped cause the two world wars, and the decline of nationalism in Europe since 1945 has contributed to the peacefulness of the postwar world.”</span></p></blockquote><p><span class="s1">Mearsheimer is correct. Even Jesus warns about wars between nations (Matthew 24:7). </span></p><p><span class="s1">With the rise of the nation-state and the inevitable subsequent rise of nationalism, conflict is most definitely expected. The world saw this in the 1990s with the break down of Yugoslavia and the independence of the nations that was under it. Mearsheimer made an emphatic prediction that the fall of the Soviet Union will open the door for conflict in Europe:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p1"><span class="s1">“I argue that the prospects for major crises and war in Europe are likely to increase markedly if the Cold War ends and this scenario unfolds.” (Mearsheimer, <i>Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War)</i></span></p></blockquote><p class="p6"><span class="s1">Andreas Molzer of the Freedom Party wants to revive the German Reich, stating: “this world needs states (<i>Staatlichkeit</i>) that have a sacred legitimation — which is the <i>Reich</i>”. And yes, by Reich, he is speaking of reviving the German Empire, stating that he wants to bring “Berlin and Vienna back into the centre of the New Europe”. Molzer wants to include in this new pan-German empire: the Baltic States, the Czech Republic, Slovenia, Croatia and Poland.</span></p><div id="attachment_114543" style="width: 524px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/377D4EB7-756C-4430-8777-95653E1626F9_v0_h.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-114543" height="308" sizes="(max-width: 514px) 100vw, 514px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/377D4EB7-756C-4430-8777-95653E1626F9_v0_h-1024x613.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/377D4EB7-756C-4430-8777-95653E1626F9_v0_h.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/377D4EB7-756C-4430-8777-95653E1626F9_v0_h-300x180.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/377D4EB7-756C-4430-8777-95653E1626F9_v0_h-768x460.jpg 768w" width="514" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Andreas Mölzer, FPÖ, EU-Wahl 2009<br />Foto: Clemens Fabry</p></div><p class="p6"><span class="s1">That this political party in Austria, the Freedom Party, is now the second largest party in the Austrian parliament, and that they want to establish a Germanic hegemony under which Catholic Poland would be subjugated, should grab our attention. The Germans have been wanting to exterminate the Poles for a long time, and did indeed butcher millions of Catholic Poles during the Holocaust. </span></p><p class="p6"><span class="s1">Near the end of the First World War, the German general, Erich Ludendorff, envisioned the Social-Darwinistic removal of two million Poles from Polish territory that Germany wanted to annex for the cause of pan-Germanism (see Tooze, The Deluge, ch. 6, p. 135). During the Nazi Holocaust, the Germans, erupting in their anti-Catholic hatred after centuries of being conditioned to the antichrist heresy of Luther,<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>carried out the extermination of millions of Poles. So horrendous was this genocide, that it moved Pope Pius XII to write:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p6"><span class="s1">“The blood of so many who have been cruelly slaughtered, though they bore no military rank, cries to heaven especially from the well-loved country of Poland. Poland, imperishably crowned in the pages of history by the long record of her loyalty to the Church and her services to Christian civilization, should claim from all eyes a brotherly, a human tear. She puts her trust in that Virgin Mother of God who is the help of Christians, and waits for the day when she will be allowed at last to emerge, unharmed, from the waves that have engulfed her.” (Pope Pius XII, <i>Darkness Over the Earth</i>, ch. viii)</span></p></blockquote><p class="p6"><span class="s1">Notice how Pius XII refers to the Poles as a people who revere the Virgin Mary. Read the words of St. John, how he saw that “the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.” (Revelation 12:17) The woman that he speaks of is the one who <i>brought forth a man child</i> (Revelation 12:5), that is, Mary the Mother of God, Jesus Christ, the one to whom the angel declared: “Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb.” (Luke 1:42) </span></p><p class="p6"><span class="s1">Thus, the dragon attacks the sons of Mary, that is, the ones who revere her, the ones of whom the Virgin Mary prophesied: “behold from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed.” (Luke 1:48) These are the ones who follow Elizabeth who, in the presence of the Virgin Mary, declared: “And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?” (Luke 1:43) For, in reverence of the Virgin Mary, they declare her to be the Mother of God, that is, the mother of our Lord. </span></p><p class="p6"><span class="s1">In hatred of those who revere the Virgin Mary, the dragon — that is, those of the antichrist spirit — attacks the sons of Mary. Germany, overtaken by the heresies of Luther, severing itself from the Church, and a nation that fanatically absorbed Darwinism, being a nation of the antichrist, exterminated Catholic Poles by the millions, and thus were these martyrs amongst the seed of the woman. For when the prophet speaks of “enmities between thee and the woman, and thy seed and her seed” (Genesis 3:15), it foretold of the great and dark war between Satan and his followers, and Christ and those who follow Christ and His mother. St. Ambrose, referring to the Germanic hoard, who converted to the Aryan heresy and sacked Rome and tore Western Christendom apart, wrote: </span></p><blockquote><p class="p6"><span class="s1">“John, likewise, saith that heretics are Antichrists, plainly marking out the Arians. For this [Arian] heresy began to be after all other heresies, and hath gathered the poisons of all. As it is written of the Antichrist, that ‘he opened his mouth to blasphemy against God, to blaspheme His Name, and to make war with His saints,’ so do they also dishonour the Son of God, and His martyrs have they not spared.” </span></p></blockquote><p>Islam destroyed the Eastern half of the Roman empire; Germanic Protestantism destroyed the Western half of Christendom in the Thirty Years War. The two will return, to war against the sons of Mary and to destroy the Church Militant.</p><p class="p6"><span class="s1">The anti-Catholic spirit remained, possessing the soul of Germany in modern times. Catholic Poles were described as <i>untermenschen, </i>or subhuman, inferior to the <i>ubermensch,</i> or the superman of Frederich Nietzsche. “The sub-human is a biological creature, crafted by nature,” said Heinrich Himmler, “which has hands, legs, eyes, and mouth, even the semblance of a brain. Nevertheless, this terrible creature is only a partial human being.” (See Jacobsen, Operation Paperclip, ch. 7, p. 122)</span></p><p class="p6"><span class="s1">One example of how the Germans treated the Poles was what they did to Janina Iwanska, a Catholic Polish girl who was a survivor of human experiments that were done to a large number of Catholic Polish women in the death camps. Iwanska was dissected alive at the Ravensbruck concentration camp, by the Waffen-SS scientist, Karl Gebhardt. First, they broke Iwanska’s legs, and then Gebhardt removed pieces of her shinbone and deliberately infected her wounds with bacteria to give her gangrene. Iwanska recounted this horror:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p6"><span class="s1">“I had an operation done on my legs by Gebhart …. During the first dressing after the operations I spoke to him. I asked Dr. Gebhart why they did the operation and they gave answer, ‘We can do the experiment because you are condemned to die.’ … Five died 48 hours after the operation, and six were shot after the operation.” (See Jacobsen, Operation Paperclip, ch. 18, pp. 349, 355-356, ellipses mine)</span></p></blockquote><p class="p6"><span class="s1">The New York Post wrote a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://nypost.com/2016/05/11/this-story-of-a-secret-sick-nazi-experiment-was-almost-never-told/"><span class="s5">story</span></a> about the experiments and described them as such:</span></p><blockquote><p class="p6"><span class="s1">“a group of 72 Polish Catholic female prisoners subjected to a series of inhumane medical experiments by Nazi doctors at Ravensbrück, the only all-female Nazi concentration camp during World War II. The women were called rabbits because they were treated like lab animals — and because the cruel experiments performed on them often left them with injuries and deformities that made them hop when they walked.” </span></p></blockquote><p class="p6"><span class="s1">On April 30th, 1945, the US Army lieutenant and physician, Dr. Marcus J. Smith, walked into the Dachau death camp in Poland. He later described with horror: </span></p><blockquote><p class="p6"><span class="s1">“On one of these walks I enter a one-story building that contains laboratory counters and storage shelves … almost everything in it has been smashed: I step over broken benches and drawers, twisted instruments and shattered glassware. In the debris, I am surprised to find a few specimen jars and bottles intact, filled with preserved human and insect tissue.” (See Jacobsen, Operation Paperclip, ch. 4, p. 63)</span></p></blockquote><p class="p6"><span class="s1">These evils were done at a time when people believed that they had reached a great peak of technological advancement. Men, worshipping innovation, advance themselves to destruction. As Pope Pius XII would write in and of that time period: “What seemed to be orderly progress was in reality nothing better than general confusion of mind which affected even the principles of morality.” (Pope Pius XII, Darkness over the Earth, ch. 5, p. 30) This was an era of much darkness, and yet people were blind to this evil, seeing light where there was none, praising as enlightenment what was in reality doctrines against humanity</span><span class="s1">.</span></p><p>We talk about the Armenian Genocide, and how Turkey will do it again, and this is true. But, why can't we view Germany with the same assiduousness as we do with Turkey? You may argue that Germany has acknowledged its Holocaust, while Turkey has not, and you would be correct.</p><p>But, once you realize <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2016/10/10/new-report-reveals-that-77-of-the-judges-who-tried-the-nazis-were-in-fact-nazis-themselves-who-worked-to-cover-up-nazi-crimes/">that 77% of Germany’s</a> post-World War Two justice ministry were actual Nazis, covering up the crimes of Nazi criminals, it should make us reconsider our conventional views of postwar Germany's spiritual state, and that vacuous view that Germany will never enter the warpath again, or that a world war will never reoccur. "For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom" (Matthew 24:7).</p><p class="p6"><span class="s1">When Dr. Marcus J. Smith saw the laboratories of the Nazis, and saw the human flesh used in experiments, he was so disturbed by what he saw, he wrote: </span></p><blockquote><p class="p6"><span class="s1">“I cannot believe this is possible in this enlightened age”</span></p></blockquote><p class="p6"><span class="s1">And such is the error of modern man: to think that the devil and all his influences are somehow gone, and the evils that the prince of darkness brings about, will never happen again. We think ourselves to be in an enlightened age, when the very sinister ideologies of the Nazis never died.  </span></p><p><span class="embed-youtube" style="text-align:center; display: block;"><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/gcNgfDsPrnw?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe></span></p>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war The Germanic Nations Of Germany And Austria Are Rising Up And Want To Conquer All Of Europe, And They Will Ally With The Future Ottoman Empire To Destroy The Church

By & Walid Shoebat (Shoebat Sunday special) One of the most prevalent errors that has been going on for many decades, is the belie...

Read More...»

State Of California Bows To Islamic Shariah Law And Becomes The First State To Recognize A Third Gender- Islam Loves The LGBT And Those Who Would Say Otherwise Is Either Ignorant Or Lying

<p>The state of California just became the first nation in the union to formally recognize a third gender according to a recent report:</p><blockquote><p>California just became the first state in the union to officially recognize a third gender option, paving the way for "non-gender binary" to be included on most official state documents.</p><p>Governor Jerry Brown signed SB179, the Gender Recognition Act, as part of a wave of legislation that passed through his office on Sunday. The act allows California residents to select an "option x" or "non-binary" option on drivers licenses, birth certificates, marriage licenses, and other-state issued documents.</p><p>Democratic state senator Scott Wiener introduced the bill, and took to Twitter Monday to show his appreciation to Governor Brown for passing the bill into law, claiming the legislation now allows California residents to "be who they are."</p><p>The bill will also make it easier for transgender individuals to select a gender option while they transition from one end of the gender binary to the other.</p><p>It also paves the way for non-binary individuals to replace existing documentation to reflect their current gender status (for example, they can now switch the gender marked on their birth certificate and receive a new document with "non-binary" selected), and removes a somewhat archaic provision in California law that requires transgender individuals to undergo a physical evaluation, and obtain a doctor's written permission before receiving documents that reflect their new gender.</p><p>The law is one of several controversial gender-related provisions working their way through the California legislature.</p><p>California's LGBT Senior Bill of Rights would make it a crime to knowingly and repeatedly mis-gender an individual in senior housing or in a nursing care facility — a law opponents believe will lead to strict criminal punishments for mis-gendering in general. The Modernizing California HIV Criminalization Laws would reduce the punishment for failing to alert blood donation centers and blood collection agencies that your blood may be HIV-positive, from a felony to a misdemeanor. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.dailywire.com/news/22375/california-now-first-state-legally-recognize-third-emily-zanotti">source</a>)</p></blockquote><p>The prevailing 'social wisdom' is that ISLAM HATES THE LGBT. This is nothing less than an absolute falsehood either spoken out of ignorance or malice. Islam LOVES the LGBT because the religion is pro-homosexual going back to Mohammed himself and has been attested to throughout its history. Islam's persecution of the LGBT, when it happens, is not because of any belief that homosexuality is wrong, but because the way in which the homosexual act was carried out was not in compliance with Islamic law.</p><p>People in the West are confused when we say that Islam can be both pro-sodomite and anti-sodomite at the same time, such as when ISIS soldiers will round up and murder homosexuals yet at the same time ISIS fighters routinely dress up as women and engage in homosexual activity with themselves and with each other and are backed up by Islamic scholars for doing such. The answer is not difficult, because as Islam is a religion from the devil, who is the father of deceit, confusion, and all lies, Islam does not operate on consistent principles revealed that are a reflection of divine truth, but is defines situation truths as divinely revealed truths without regard to consistency at all, which is another sign of the evil nature of the religion and its evil founder Mohammed. It is the same reason why as I have pointed out for years, Islam will use Trinitarian theology to describe the relationship between Allah and the Koran (that the Koran is the uncreated and eternal word of Allah, which is exactly what Jesus is- the uncreated and eternal word of the Father) yet will say that the Christian Trinity is evil and pagan while refusing to acknowledge the have the same belief except about a physical book instead of a person. Islam is masterful at deceit, and one should not expect to encounter anything less regardless of the matter being discussed.</p><p>The issue of homosexuality was addressed by Mohammed during his lifetime. While not discussed in the Koran, there are passages in Islamic sacred scripture which speak of Mohammed's dealings with <em>mukhannathun</em>, a group men who <strong>exhibit all of the tendencies of women, dress as women, and for all intensive purposes are women while remaining men in terms of their gender but not function</strong>:</p><p style="text-align: center">حَدَّثَنَا عُثْمَانُ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَ، حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدَةُ، عَنْ هِشَامِ بْنِ عُرْوَةَ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ زَيْنَبَ ابْنَةِ أُمِّ سَلَمَةَ، عَنْ أُمِّ سَلَمَةَ، أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم كَانَ عِنْدَهَا وَفِي الْبَيْتِ مُخَنَّثٌ، فَقَالَ الْمُخَنَّثُ لأَخِي أُمِّ سَلَمَةَ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ أَبِي أُمَيَّةَ إِنْ فَتَحَ اللَّهُ عَلَيْكُمُ الطَّائِفَ غَدًا أَدُلُّكَ عَلَى ابْنَةِ غَيْلاَنَ، فَإِنَّهَا تُقْبِلُ بِأَرْبَعٍ وَتُدْبِرُ بِثَمَانٍ‏.‏ فَقَالَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ "‏ لاَ يَدْخُلَنَّ هَذَا عَلَيْكُنَّ</p><p style="text-align: center">Othman bin Abi Shaybah told us, from Abi Hisham ibn Erwa, from his father, from Zaynab, the daughter of Umm Salamah, that Umm Salamah said that the Prophet was with her, there was an effeminate man in the house. The effeminate man said to Um Salama's brother, `Abdullah bin Abi Umaiyya, "If Allah should make you conquer Ta'if tomorrow, I recommend that you take the daughter of Ghailan (in marriage) for (she is so fat) that she shows four folds of flesh when facing you and eight when she turns her back." Thereupon the Prophet said (to us), "This (effeminate man) should not enter upon you (anymore).  (Bukhari Book 67, Hadith 5290)</p><p>...</p><p style="text-align: center">حَدَّثَنَا هَارُونُ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ، وَمُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْعَلاَءِ، أَنَّ أَبَا أُسَامَةَ، أَخْبَرَهُمْ عَنْ مُفَضَّلِ بْنِ يُونُسَ، عَنِ الأَوْزَاعِيِّ، عَنْ أَبِي يَسَارٍ الْقُرَشِيِّ، عَنْ أَبِي هَاشِمٍ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ، أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم أُتِيَ بِمُخَنَّثٍ قَدْ خَضَبَ يَدَيْهِ وَرِجْلَيْهِ بِالْحِنَّاءِ فَقَالَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏"‏ مَا بَالُ هَذَا ‏"‏ ‏.‏ فَقِيلَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ يَتَشَبَّهُ بِالنِّسَاءِ ‏.‏ فَأُمِرَ بِهِ فَنُفِيَ إِلَى النَّقِيعِ فَقَالُوا يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ أَلاَ نَقْتُلُهُ فَقَالَ ‏"‏ إِنِّي نُهِيتُ عَنْ قَتْلِ الْمُصَلِّينَ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قَالَ أَبُو أُسَامَةَ وَالنَّقِيعُ نَاحِيَةٌ عَنِ الْمَدِينَةِ وَلَيْسَ بِالْبَقِيعِ‏</p><p style="text-align: center">Narrated by Abi Yassar al-Qurashi from Abu Hashim from Abu Hurayrah that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) came with an effeminate man who had adorned his hands and legs with henna. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "What is wrong with this?" He said: "O Messenger of Allaah, be like women." Kill him, he said: "I have been forbidden for the killing of worshipers." (Dawud Book 43, Hadith 4928)</p><p>As one can see from this tradition, Mohammed separated these effeminate men from the women, but as he also noted, he did not harm them. They were allowed to continue to exist in society, albeit separated from being bound to women, which indicated that based on their dispositions, they were men who were taking up relations with men.</p><p>There are several traditions which explicitly communicate that homosexuals must be executed or otherwise banned for society. However, as the traditions themselves note, they are formally classified as <em>da'if</em> ("weak") by the Muslims themselves. Two are listed below:</p><blockquote><p>دَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عَمْرٍو السَّوَّاقُ، حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الْعَزِيزِ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ، عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ أَبِي عَمْرٍو، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ، قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏"‏ مَنْ وَجَدْتُمُوهُ يَعْمَلُ عَمَلَ قَوْمِ لُوطٍ فَاقْتُلُوا الْفَاعِلَ وَالْمَفْعُولَ بِهِ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قَالَ وَفِي الْبَابِ عَنْ جَابِرٍ وَأَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ ‏.‏ قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى وَإِنَّمَا يُعْرَفُ هَذَا الْحَدِيثُ عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم مِنْ هَذَا الْوَجْهِ وَرَوَى مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ إِسْحَاقَ هَذَا الْحَدِيثَ عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ أَبِي عَمْرٍو فَقَالَ ‏"‏ مَلْعُونٌ مَنْ عَمِلَ عَمَلَ قَوْمِ لُوطٍ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ وَلَمْ يَذْكُرْ فِيهِ الْقَتْلَ وَذَكَرَ فِيهِ مَلْعُونٌ مَنْ أَتَى بَهِيمَةً ‏.‏ وَقَدْ رُوِيَ هَذَا الْحَدِيثُ عَنْ عَاصِمِ بْنِ عُمَرَ عَنْ سُهَيْلِ بْنِ أَبِي صَالِحٍ عَنْ أَبِيهِ عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ ‏"‏ اقْتُلُوا الْفَاعِلَ وَالْمَفْعُولَ بِهِ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى هَذَا حَدِيثٌ فِي إِسْنَادِهِ مَقَالٌ وَلاَ نَعْرِفُ أَحَدًا رَوَاهُ عَنْ سُهَيْلِ بْنِ أَبِي صَالِحٍ غَيْرَ عَاصِمِ بْنِ عُمَرَ الْعُمَرِيِّ ‏.‏ وَعَاصِمُ بْنُ عُمَرَ يُضَعَّفُ فِي الْحَدِيثِ مِنْ قِبَلِ حِفْظِهِ ‏.‏ وَاخْتَلَفَ أَهْلُ الْعِلْمِ فِي حَدِّ اللُّوطِيِّ فَرَأَى بَعْضُهُمْ أَنَّ عَلَيْهِ الرَّجْمَ أَحْصَنَ أَوْ لَمْ يُحْصِنْ وَهَذَا قَوْلُ مَالِكٍ وَالشَّافِعِيِّ وَأَحْمَدَ وَإِسْحَاقَ ‏.‏ وَقَالَ بَعْضُ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ مِنْ فُقَهَاءِ التَّابِعِينَ مِنْهُمُ الْحَسَنُ الْبَصْرِيُّ وَإِبْرَاهِيمُ النَّخَعِيُّ وَعَطَاءُ بْنُ أَبِي رَبَاحٍ وَغَيْرُهُمْ قَالُوا حَدُّ اللُّوطِيِّ حَدُّ الزَّانِي وَهُوَ قَوْلُ الثَّوْرِيِّ وَأَهْلِ الْكُوفَةِ</p><p>The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "If you find him to do the work of the people of Lot, then kill the offender and the effect on him." Narrated by 'Abd-al-'Aziz ibn Muhammad, He said in the section on Jabir and Abu Huraira said Abu Issa, but knows this talk about Ibn Abbas from the Prophet peace be upon him from this face and narrated Muhammad ibn Ishaq This hadeeth narrated from 'Asim ibn Umar from Suhail ibn Abi Salih on the authority of' Umar ibn Abi 'Umar, Abu Huraira narrated that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "Kill the offender and kill him." Abu Issa said this in his hadeeth, and he did not know anyone who narrated it from Suhail ibn Abi Salih Ghi Asim ibn Omar narrated that it is weak in the hadeeth before it was memorized, and the scholars differed concerning the extent of the kaafir, and some of them saw that stoning was stoned or not. This is the view of Malik, al-Shaafa'i, Ahmad, and Ishaaq. Al-Hasan al-Basri, Ibrahim al-Nakha'i, 'Ata' ibn Abi Rabah, and others said: And the people of Kufa. (Source: Tirmidhi's <span style="text-decoration: underline">Jami'</span>, Book 17, Hadith 1456)(</p></blockquote><p style="text-align: center">and</p><blockquote><p>حَدَّثَنَا إِسْحَاقُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ بْنِ رَاهَوَيْهِ، حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّزَّاقِ، أَخْبَرَنَا ابْنُ جُرَيْجٍ، أَخْبَرَنِي ابْنُ خُثَيْمٍ، قَالَ سَمِعْتُ سَعِيدَ بْنَ جُبَيْرٍ، وَمُجَاهِدًا، يُحَدِّثَانِ عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ، فِي الْبِكْرِ يُوجَدُ عَلَى اللُّوطِيَّةِ قَالَ يُرْجَمُ ‏.‏ قَالَ أَبُو دَاوُدَ حَدِيثُ عَاصِمٍ يُضَعِّفُ حَدِيثَ عَمْرِو بْنِ أَبِي عَمْرٍو</p></blockquote><blockquote><p>Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: If a man who is not married is seized committing sodomy, he will be stoned to death. Abu Dawud said: The tradition of 'Asim proved the tradition of 'Amir b. Abi 'Amr as weak. (Source: Abu Dawud, Book 40, Hadith 4463)</p></blockquote><p>This means that while they can be used in understanding and applying Islamic law and theology, they are questionable and not to be taken as absolute statement of truth, but rather something to be debated and even contradicted. This compares with traditions classified as <em>sahih</em> ("sound", meaning absolutely true) or <em>muhsan</em> ("good," meaning highly reliable). The only classification beneath <em>da'if </em>is <em>maudu'</em>, which means "forged" and is to be ignored.</p><p> </p><p>So from looking at these statements in Islamic sacred tradition itself, we can see that Islam does not speak with the same license that the modern "west" does about homosexuality. It does not say that one should give oneself wholly over to libertine passions and that the society should bend over to whatever desire the LGBT wants at the current time. It even floats the idea that one may execute sodomites, but that very idea is itself admitted by Muslims to be controversial and a weak argument. What Islam does say is that based on the example of Mohammed, these men are not to simply mix with other men yet they are allowed to live in society as they please among their own communities as a class of their own. The actions of Mohammed establish the acknowledgement of a third gender, of men who live as women as conduct themselves as women and are protected under Islam as a distinct social class regarded with equal piety and dignity as fellow Muslims. Their homosexuality does not impede their piety before Allah, meaning it is not regarded as a sin. Indeed, in Islamic eyes it is still a worse sin to embrace Christ as one's savior than it is to be a sodomite who makes his daily prayers to Allah and lives in accordance with the prescriptions for the third gender established by Mohammed.</p><p>This third gender- the Mukhannath- is the reason why the concept of sodomy as a serious sin before God and a crime against society was never a serious legal issue in the Muslim world ever, including today because it was seen as a natural division in society that had to be distinguished yet protected in the example of Mohammed. As Wikipedia notes:</p><blockquote><p>Homosexuality was a key symbolic issue throughout the <a title="Middle Ages" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Ages">Middle Ages</a> in [Islamic] <a class="mw-redirect" title="Iberia" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iberia">Iberia</a>. As was customary everywhere until the nineteenth century, homosexuality was not viewed as a congenital disposition or ‘identity’; the focus was on nonprocreative sexual practices, of which sodomy was the most controversial.” For example, in “<a title="Al-Andalus" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Andalus">al-Andalus</a> homosexual pleasures were much indulged by the intellectual and political elite. Evidence includes the behavior of rulers . . . who kept male harems.”<sup id="cite_ref-84" class="reference"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_in_Islam#cite_note-84">[84]</a></sup> Although early islamic writings such as the Quran expressed a mildly negative attitude towards homosexuality, most muslim societies treated the subject with indifference, if not admiration. Few literary works displayed hostility towards non-heterosexuality, apart from partisan statements and literary debates about types of love (which also occurred in heterosexual contexts).<sup id="cite_ref-85" class="reference"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_in_Islam#cite_note-85">[85]</a></sup> Khaled el-Rouayheb even maintain that "much if not most of the extant love poetry of the period [16th to 18th century] is pederastic in tone, portraying an adult male poet's passionate love for a teenage boy".<sup id="cite_ref-86" class="reference"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_in_Islam#cite_note-86">[86]</a></sup></p><p>El-Rouayheb suggest that even though religious scholars considered sodomy as an abhorrent sin, most of them did not genuinely believe that it was illicit to fall in love with a boy or expressing this love via poetry.<sup id="cite_ref-87" class="reference"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_in_Islam#cite_note-87">[87]</a></sup> But in the secular society, a male’s “desire to penetrate desirable youth was seen as perfectly normal”, even if not lawful.<sup id="cite_ref-88" class="reference"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_in_Islam#cite_note-88">[88]</a></sup> On the other hand, men adopting the passive role were more subjected to stigma. The medical term <i>ubnah</i>qualified the pathological desire of a male to exclusively and continually be on the receiving end of anal intercourse. Various physician theorized on this condition, including <a title="Muhammad ibn Zakariya al-Razi" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_ibn_Zakariya_al-Razi">Rhazes</a> who thought it was correlated with small genitals and that a treatment was possible provided that the subject was deemed to be not too effeminate and the behavior not "prolonged".<sup id="cite_ref-89" class="reference"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_in_Islam#cite_note-89">[89]</a></sup><a title="Dawud al-Antaki" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawud_al-Antaki">Dawud al-Antaki</a> advanced that it could be caused by an acidic substance embed in the veins of the anus causing itchiness and thus the need to seek relief.<sup id="cite_ref-90" class="reference"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_in_Islam#cite_note-90">[90]  </a></sup>(<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_in_Islam">source</a>)</p></blockquote><p>As Wikipedia notes, the emphasis in Islam is not so much on the sodomizer but on the one being sodomized, and this is because if a man is going to be sodomized, he needs to be a <em>mukhannath, </em>for otherwise would be a grave violation of Islamic law and could subject a man to punishment, including death for unlawful sexual activity. However, so long as the one being sodomized is a <em>mukhannath</em> and there are no other possible issues, he may be sodomized as much as he pleases without incurring the penalty of sin.</p><p style="text-align: center"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Tuhfet_Ul-Mulk.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-114530" height="300" sizes="(max-width: 196px) 100vw, 196px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Tuhfet_Ul-Mulk-196x300.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Tuhfet_Ul-Mulk-196x300.jpg 196w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Tuhfet_Ul-Mulk.jpg 288w" width="196" /></a></p><p style="text-align: center">The cover of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tuhfet_Ul-Mulk.jpg">Tuhfet Ul-Mulk</a>, a book published in 1773 in Ottoman Turkey showing a group of Muslims sodomizing each other. While homosexuality was formally decriminalized in 1858, this cover is another indication of the tolerance this behavior was shown in society.</p><p style="text-align: center">Sodomy was never regarded as a sin in Islam that is an intrinsically disordered act. Indeed, one faced more danger being a Christian in a Muslim society than being a sodomite and a Muslim. It is utterly lacking in understanding or is outright dishonest to propagate the idea that Islam hates the LGBT, because nothing could be further from the truth.</p><p>This is the reason why there are still in Afghanistan, a country that is veritably 100% Muslim, a huge number of men who dress and live as women, called <em>bacha bazi</em> boys. It is the reason why in spite of Turkish President Erdogan's crackdown on LGBT rights, Erdogan and his wife will have dinner with Bulent Ersoy, one of the most popular singers in Turkey who is also Turkey's most famous <em>mukhannath</em>. It is why Pakistan issues passports with a third gender listed on them, and the reason why Pakistan's legalization of "transgenderism" has become a contested <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.pri.org/stories/2017-07-29/pakistans-traditional-third-gender-isnt-happy-trans-movement">issue </a>that was raised by the <em>mukhannatun</em> themselves and why homosexuality is at the same time a crime punishable by death in Pakistan, because the idea of "transgenderism" is a western concept of the <em>mukhannath</em> that might, from a religious perspective, be in contradiction to the rules established under Islam.</p><p style="text-align: center"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/645x344-1466415693225.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-114529" height="160" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/645x344-1466415693225-300x160.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/645x344-1466415693225-300x160.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/645x344-1466415693225.jpg 645w" width="300" /></a></p><p style="text-align: center">Why would President Erdogan (here with his wife Emine, in the blue hijab), who has actively persecuted the LGBT, go to dinner with Bulent Ersoy (on the left), who is clearly a man dressed as a woman?</p><p style="text-align: center">The answer is above. He is part of the <em>mukhannath</em> class that is a part of Islam. Indeed, the opposition to the LGBT in Muslim nations today is not based on an intrinsic opposition to homosexuality as a moral issue due to the act of sodomy itself, but as a violation of Islamic law on how one goes about carrying out the sin.</p><p>Recently, Jihad Watch reported that the central Asian nation of Tajikistan, which is majority Muslim, came out and was going to "purge" gays:</p><blockquote><p>As humiliating as this move is for the gay population in the Sunni Islamic nation of Tajikistan, of greater concern is the persecution that threatens to follow this “Purge” and “Morality” registry.</p><p>The degradation and threats to the gay population is unceasing in Islamic countries and under the Sharia. Many Islamic preachers in the West have also called for the killing of gays, or have openly taught about Allah’s cursing of gays.</p><p>Recently, Ali Kadri, spokesperson for the Islamic Council of Queensland in Australia, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/09/muslim-leader-on-gays-we-are-afraid-if-we-come-out-with-our-opinion-then-the-left-may-abandon-us" target="_blank" rel="noopener">stated about gays</a>: “We are afraid if we come out with our opinion then the left may abandon us.”</p><p>Despite the social, systemic and physical persecution of gays by Islamic supremacists, Westerners are largely silent on the subject, as are Western gay lobbies. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/10/islamic-tajikistan-draws-up-purge-and-morality-register-for-gays">source</a>, main article cited <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/tajikstan-gay-citizens-register-civil-rights-homophobia-lgbt-central-asia-a8008821.html">here</a>)</p></blockquote><p>However, they also failed to mention that sodomy is completely legal in Tajikistan. Yet as I mentioned in the above discussion, this should not be a surprise at all what Tajikistan is doing. Far from the idea that ISLAM IS PERSECUTING GAYS that comes through in the article, the reality is still simple, just with a little more details. It does not appear that Tajikistan is not just 'purging gays,' and this is because sodomy is legal and (at least from what I have seen) there are no attempts to stop this, and as we have pointed out, sodomy laws in all nations are specifically directed at curbing homosexual behavior. This would lead one to conclude that what is happening here is that per Islamic teachings as we noted earlier, they are actually following in the words of Mohammed by purging the segment of gays who act in ways that are inconsistent with the teachings of Islam on homosexuality. They are not attempting to ban homosexuality as that would actually be anti-Islamic- they are seeking to ban the execution of homosexual activity in ways that oppose Islamic teachings, thus actually preserving the LGBT in their society per their historically protected status.</p><p>The difference between the LGBT as practiced in the West and in the Muslim world is the difference between the communists and the national socialists, or between the feminized homosexuals versus the masculinized homosexuals. All of these opposing groups accept the fundamental philosophies and thus are actually intellectual cousins. The fighting between them is how to execute the beliefs which they already accept. For Socialists, it is whether to use economics (international socialists/communists) or race (national socialists) as the point around which to cause revolution to create a perfect society. For the homosexuals in the West, the argument is between whether homosexuality should have a feminized approach, or whether it should have a masculinized approach. In the case of Islam, it is whether or not the Muslim world should accept the libertine western ideas about homosexuality, or to persists in the practice of homosexuality as theologically and historically taught by Islam. There is no conflict to essence of the matter being discussed, just how to carry out the already agreed upon beliefs.</p><p>Hence is the situation with California. The state did not accept Shariah Law in the literal sense. However, their acceptance of the idea of a third gender is in reality the acceptance of an Islamic idea deeply rooted into the religion yet seldom discussed. There is no choice between Islam and the LGBT, and since both are evil, the only choice a Christian has is to walk away and choose neither.</p><p>The Bible makes very clear that homosexuality is one of four sins that cry out to heaven for vengeance alongside willful murder of the innocent, oppressing the widow and orphan, and depriving a working man of his justly earned wages. The serious nature of homosexual activity cannot be understand just as the threat which Islam poses to Western society cannot be either, for both are evil, and if one is going to call oneself a Christian, one must fight all evils, not just the ones considered socially acceptable because, as the relationship between Islam and the LGBT shows, all evil has the same source of perversion. One cannot opposed one form of perversion without calling out other forms, because the nature of the perversity and the source which it comes from is of the same essence, which is sin, and as the Bible states, the wage of sin is death. If we are to seek and desire eternal life, one must be ready to, echoing the words of St. Paul, put to death all that which would oppose. This means to oppose both homosexuality and Islam because they are both evil as they share a common source of perversity.</p>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war State Of California Bows To Islamic Shariah Law And Becomes The First State To Recognize A Third Gender- Islam Loves The LGBT And Those Who Would Say Otherwise Is Either Ignorant Or Lying

The state of California just became the first nation in the union to formally recognize a third gender according to a recent report: Ca...

Read More...»

Prophecy Is Taking Shape As Iran Is Now Conquering Northern Iraq And Forming Its Shiite Crescent

<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/ia.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone wp-image-114517" height="599" sizes="(max-width: 912px) 100vw, 912px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/ia-300x197.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/ia-300x197.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/ia-768x503.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/ia-1024x671.jpg 1024w" width="912" /></a></p><p><strong>By Walid Shoebat</strong></p><p>We have been saying it all along, that whenever ISIS is defeated in Iraq, Iran will move in. While the media says that "Iraqi forces took over Kirkuk this week", reality is it was Iran and not Iraq that took Kirkuk. The military operation of today and yesterday was carried out under the banner of the Iraqi military, sure, but the ground forces were Iranian-backed Shiite militias which even included the aid from Al-Quds Force which was lead by Qassem Soleimani who bribed certain elements of U.S allied Kurdish factions to cut and run abandoning their positions. This opened the runway for the Iranian backed Shiites to take over Kirkuk.</p><p>The Kurds of Kirkuk (biblical Medes) read the writing on the wall that Babylon is now in the hands of the Persians and <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.aljazeera.net/news/arabic/2017/10/19/مصادر-كردية-100-ألف-كردي-فروا-من-كركوك">one hundred thousand Kurds</a> fled Kirkuk. With the return of Kirkuk to Iran's puppet, the balance of power appears to have shifted between the ethnic communities in the Kurdish-majority city to the delight of its Turkmen residents. We have always maintained that the issue is not Sunni versus Shiite, the Turkmen (ethnic Turks) allied to Turkey are Sunni and the Iraqi forces that took over Kirkuk are Shiites.</p><p>And besides Iran's interests, Turkey has interest in Kirkuk's Turkmen and Iran now has control over the richest oil spot in the region (40% of Iraq's oil). Iran, the biblical bear, is eating its share of flesh to soon devour all three ribs that make up Iraq, the biblical lion, which had its wings plucked by the U.S after it ousted Saddam out of power.</p><div style="width: 650px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img alt="" class="img-responsive article-img" height="380" src="http://img.dotmsr.com/2017/10/large-d_2699292925692666590.jpg" title="التركمان.. ورقة تركيا في أزمة كركوك وكردستان" width="640" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Turkmen</p></div><p>Kurdistan (biblical Media) is defeated and has no power in the unfolding event since the bear (Medo-Persia) rises only on one side; <em>Persia</em> without <em>Media.</em> The latter is defeated and its hope to form a state is shattered.</p><div style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a class="js-lightbox lightbox_link vilynx_listened" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://media3.s-nbcnews.com/j/newscms/2017_41/2187601/171012-quds-commander-qassem-soleimani-ac-508p_edcd6ea29c868c2dbe33b725535163d6.nbcnews-ux-2880-1000.jpg"><img alt="Image: Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani" class="img-responsive img_inline" height="368" src="https://media3.s-nbcnews.com/j/newscms/2017_41/2187601/171012-quds-commander-qassem-soleimani-ac-508p_edcd6ea29c868c2dbe33b725535163d6.nbcnews-ux-600-480.jpg" title="Image: Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani" width="600" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani</p></div><p>Its always the case in warfare, the smaller dog, in this case the Kurds who defeated ISIS simply cleared the runway for the bigger dog: Iran to control northern Iraq, and Turkey to control northern Syria. Both will swallow much territory in the coming future and the U.S. can do very little for the Kurds. When it comes to nations there is no such thing as permanent allies.</p><p>And it should be to no surprise that Turkey, a Sunni rival to Iran came out to confirm its support for Iran's backed Shiites to enter into Kirkuk. Kirkuk's Turkmen (Sunnis) welcomed Iran's militia. Last August, a spokesman for the Turkish presidency, Ibrahim Kalan, said of the city: "Yes, the Kurds and the Arabs, but the basic identity of Kirkuk is a Turkmen city."</p><p>Turkey has a historic interest in Kirkuk since Ottoman times. Last month, a slogan by Turkish President Erdogan was written in the Ottoman script on the walls of Kirkuk: "Recep Tayyip Erdogan 'we may come suddenly one night'". Erdogan promised that one day he will enter northern Iraq, suddenly and by surprise. It seems that Iran beat him to the punch or else they combined efforts to divide the region to form their two crescents: Shiite and Sunni, but this time united.</p><p><img class="progressiveMedia-image js-progressiveMedia-image" data-src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1600/0*7-7tz0AdjCs6u9Jp.jpg" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1600/0*7-7tz0AdjCs6u9Jp.jpg" /></p><p>The U.S. concern and meddling in the Middle East should teach us a lesson: throw out one tyrant (Saddam) from Iraq and you will get ISIS; drive ISIS out of Iraq and you will get Iran; get rid of Iran and Turkey will move in; get rid of Turkey and the Middle East will finally be at rest. At least this is what happened when the Ottoman Empire was finally bruised. Will westerners learn from the lesson's that Jesus gave: get rid of one demon and a host of other demons will enter. Never fight one evil. All evils must be equally fought.</p><p>It is all about regional interests. In fact, the U.S. knew about Iran's intents. Haider al-Abadi <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/18/world/middleeast/iraq-kurds-kirkuk-iran.html">stated</a> “At a minimum, the U.S. knew that the attack was coming.”</p><p>Iran's entering Kirkuk is for a reason. Years ago we <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2015/03/04/netanyahus-warning-to-u-s-regarding-irans-nuclear-deal-falls-on-deaf-ears-iran-will-gain-the-nuke-and-is-already-making-its-way-to-gulp-up-iraq/">stated</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The U.S. is gazing away from the encroaching Iranian forces taking up forward positions in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, where they are busy fashioning a Shiite Crescent that encircles Sunni Arab states as well as Israel ... They key to advancing these agendas is ISIS. While we rejoice when we see ISIS lose battles, <strong>what many fail to see, is that ISIS is the chip used to make all the moves to bolster two tyrannies, Iran and Turkey.</strong></p></blockquote><p>We were correct because we try to study scriptures to correct our errors. Today ISIS is pretty much gone, Turkey (the biblical Leopard) is flexing its muscles and Iran (the bear) is already consuming.</p><p>Back in 2015 we <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2015/03/04/netanyahus-warning-to-u-s-regarding-irans-nuclear-deal-falls-on-deaf-ears-iran-will-gain-the-nuke-and-is-already-making-its-way-to-gulp-up-iraq/">predicted</a>:</p><blockquote><p>"the <strong>US will allow Iran to reach the status</strong> of a pre-nuclear power and regional hegemon, while Tehran, in return, <strong>will send “boots on the ground” to fight in Iraq</strong>, Syria and even Afghanistan, allowing “<strong>the bear to eat much flesh</strong>” (Daniel 7:5). <strong>Iran through Iraq</strong>, <strong>we have always maintained</strong>, <strong>will prove the linchpin in an area of Iranian influence among predominantly Shiite governments and organizations that stretched across Iraq, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, and the Gaza Strip</strong>. This zone has been variously described as an Iranian or <strong>Shiite “Arc of Influence” or the Shiite Crescent."</strong></p></blockquote><p>These days prophecy is being fulfilled faster than ever. Kirkuk is strategic. Not only does it have vast oil resources, Iran's takeover eliminates any possibility for an independent Kurdish state to emerge from the Kurdish Regional Government area in northern Iraq. We have been saying this for a while now since the "bear" (Medo-Persia) will arise on one side. This is Iran's rise (Persia) without the Medes (the Kurds).</p><div class="page" title="Page 3"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p>Iran had an edge over Turkey in Iraq for several reasons. Iran’s skilful use of Shia militias gives it an edge over Turkey’s direct military intervention, which is unwelcomed by the Iraqi government in Baghdad. Also, the Iraqi government officials (Shiites) have been very critical of the ‘illegal’ Turkish military presence in Northern Iraq so Turkey's incursions will not gain Iraqi government support. For Iran, Iraq is strategically more important than any other Arab country since it shares more than 1400 km of its borders with Iraq. After Saddam's fall, Iran played a significant role in shaping Iraq’s new political system and is why it is often described as an 'Iranian puppet government'.</p></div></div></div><p>The next to be taken over is Sinjar city, close to the border with Syria and with that Iran can begin its long awaited program we spoke about: to form the Iranian Crescent.</p><p>These two crescents, the Iranian 'Shiite-Crescent' and the 'Sunni Crescent' led by Turkey will eventually form the pincer around Jerusalem.</p><div id="attachment_95429" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><div id="attachment_95429" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/sc.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-95429"><img alt="" class="wp-image-95429" height="449" sizes="(max-width: 670px) 100vw, 670px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/sc.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/sc.jpg 545w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/sc-300x201.jpg 300w" width="670" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Shiite Crescent</p></div></div><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/sc.gif"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-114518 aligncenter" height="476" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/sc-300x296.gif" width="482" /></a></p><p>Indeed, it is Iran (not Iraq or Turkey) that is taking over the richest land (Kirkuk). Besides Iran's Al-Quds Force, in Iraq the main military militia force is Asaib Ahl al-Haq (League of the Righteous) that is backed by Iran. Besides <em>Asaib</em> <em>Ahl</em> <em>al</em>–<em>Haq</em>, there are the <em>Badr </em><em>Brigades</em>, formed in the 1980s during the Iran-Iraq War, and the younger and more secretive <em>Kataib</em> <em>Hezbollah, </em>which is regarded as a terrorist organization by the State Department. The three militias have been instrumental in battling ISIS, the rival Wahhabist Sunni sect. These militias are the three small Iraqi Shi’ite armies, all backed by Iran, which together have become the most powerful military force in Iraq since the collapse of the national army and are key to Iran’s power and influence inside neighboring Iraq.</p><div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p>While experts foresee a historical Ottoman-Persian rivalry in Mesopotamia we see it differently. What we see is a unity between the two since Turkey is Sufi and has kinship to Shiites sine the religious apparatus of Iran are Azeri Turks. Secondly, the neo-Ottoman Turks are warming its relations and increasing economic and energy ties with Iran and its other Muslim neighbors. Turkey's economy is growing, and Iran is the only land corridor for Turkey to reach Asia and Iran's needs are similar. With the Eurasian and E.U dealings Turkey will soon play a significant part to form an economic superpower with Germany and Northern Europe to lead the global economy. Germany and Turkey have been allies since 1871 when Germany was founded as a nation.</p><p>Turkey is treading very carefully not to be seen as, effectively, a Sunni power grouped with the Arab states’ agenda in Iraq or the Wahhabists agenda of Saudi Arabia. Prophetically speaking this will be the case since Persia and Turkey will unite against Jerusalem while Arabia (Sheba and Dedan) condemn this coalition and stand on the sidelines.</p><div class="page" title="Page 9"></div></div></div></div><p>In conclusion, the Middle East is not that complex to understand. The problem is the oversimplification by westerners who want simplified answers. The problem with most people is that they always think that there is only one demon.  When the U.S. overthrew Saddam Hussein’s Ba’athist government it resulted in the emergence of a Shia dominated government in Baghdad replacing it with an Iraqi Shiite government friendly to Tehran. Today no one can argue that this decision eliminated Iraqi Sunnis from the equation. These have been an existential threat to the Islamic Republic of Iran and had tipped the local balance of power significantly in Tehran’s favor. As a result of NATO's supposed exorcizing one demon they simply brought in other demons like ISIS and now Iran and Turkey. So everyone said that we need to eliminate ISIS. We said this does not make a single bit of difference and in fact ridding the world from ISIS will be worse. We <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2015/03/04/netanyahus-warning-to-u-s-regarding-irans-nuclear-deal-falls-on-deaf-ears-iran-will-gain-the-nuke-and-is-already-making-its-way-to-gulp-up-iraq/">stated</a> years ago that:</p><blockquote><p>"once Iran cleans the ISIS mess in Iraq, we will all rejoice. Iran will be happy, the U.S. will be happy, while all we’ve done is chase out ISIS while Iran’s Shiite militias are already running amok in Iraq. All that, while Israel awaits the outcome, that when Sunni and Shiite want to put aside their differences in efforts to stabilize the region will begin by uniting both the Shiite and Sunni crescents, the two horns, the pincer if you will, by focusing and switching their energy towards Jerusalem ... The West will be happy to get rid of ISIS out of Iraq, while Iran will be happy to camp in Iraq permanently."</p></blockquote><p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/ghods-www.ranjnameh.blog_.ir_.jpg"><img alt="ghods-www.ranjnameh.blog.ir" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-74255" height="477" sizes="(max-width: 720px) 100vw, 720px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/ghods-www.ranjnameh.blog_.ir_.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/ghods-www.ranjnameh.blog_.ir_.jpg 720w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/ghods-www.ranjnameh.blog_.ir_-300x199.jpg 300w" width="720" /></a></p><p>It takes years later for the foolish masses to understand that what excites them and tickles their ears today will depress them tomorrow when they only find out their folly after its too late. These always try to cast out a single demon. Fools will always scorn the watchman who warns of the multitude of demons. Christianity is not about fighting ISIS or Islam exclusively; it is about combating all evil.</p><p><span class="embed-youtube" style="text-align:center; display: block;"><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/videoseries?list=PLXcRXeIdIAWdqKPbyXm1w94HdmX2EGLTW&hl=en_US' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe></span></p>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Prophecy Is Taking Shape As Iran Is Now Conquering Northern Iraq And Forming Its Shiite Crescent

By Walid Shoebat We have been saying it all along, that whenever ISIS is defeated in Iraq, Iran will move in. While the media says that...

Read More...»