ANONYMOUS - OUR VOICE

World's Oldest Profession Gets The Pink Slip As People Flock To Sex Robot Brothels- We Warned You About This

<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/nintchdbpict000337509659.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-112680" height="300" sizes="(max-width: 172px) 100vw, 172px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/nintchdbpict000337509659-172x300.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/nintchdbpict000337509659-172x300.jpg 172w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/nintchdbpict000337509659.jpg 550w" width="172" /></a>It has been reported that robots are taking over jobs that used to be done by humans. Now that may even include "the world's oldest profession" as sex robot brothels are starting to appear and people are flocking to them in droves:<blockquote>GONE are the days of blow-up women with perpetually open mouths - sex dolls are rapidly evolving and becoming more lifelike than ever.And now a brothel in Dublin is renting out a silicone robot sex doll for £80 an hour.A bit like a buxom Barbie doll, the blonde android has massive boobs, an hourglass figure and eerily lifelike facial features fixed into a sexy pout.Described as “Ireland’s most realistic sex doll”, Passion Dolly arrived at the Dublin brothel less than a month ago and dozens of punters have already had their way with her.Weighing eight stone with 32 E boobs the doll imported from America has a metal skeleton covered in silicone and responds to vibrations moving like a human.She is being leased out by two Eastern European sex workers who allow men to pay to spend time with her – but not remove her from the premises.The ad on an adult website reads: “Are you wasting money paying for sex… or watching porn? Why not have the full pleasure of having sex with the most beautiful girl whenever you want and as many times as you want? Passion Dolly is an ultra-realistic sex doll for your pleasure.“She is made of either TPE or medical silicone and has a metal skeleton as internal structure to allow you to bend and twist the doll’s torso, head, arms and legs to pose in any sexual position you please.”When customers arrive they will find Dolly - who you can rent for £80 an hour or £40 per half hour – lying on a bed in a dimly lit room.Condoms and tissues are also provided.Her owners explained: “We have had her about a month and have had dozens of visitors, mostly Irish men and ranging in all ages.“Some of them are a bit lonely, a few have social problems interacting with women, while others have a fascination with dolls.”In a recent report, the Foundation for Responsible Robotics said that android love dolls will become increasingly common over the next 10 years.Some scientists have even warned that there is a danger that the ‘pleasure-bots’ could lead to a decrease in real human relationships.They could also lead to the objectification of children and women and could encourage abuse, rape and paedophilia.However, they also claimed they could provide help for people who find it hard to have intimate relationships – like those in care homes, and people with dementia or disabilities. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.thesun.co.uk/living/3979975/dublin-brothel-rents-out-32e-sex-doll/">source</a>)</blockquote>I'm not surprised. In fact, I expect this to become rather normal in terms of its social acceptability, not objective morality.Last year, I wrote an article about what I called is the "coming sex robot revolution," and how people need to pay attention to this because this is next and possibly, final stage of the sexual revolution, that through the separation of any human connection from sexual activity it becomes entirely an exercise in hedonism and will serve as one of several gateways towards unspeakable evil:<blockquote>**********The Coming Sex Robot Revolution Proves Again Catholic Prophecy That Says The Final Battle Will Be Over Marriage And The Family**********<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Lucia_Dos_Santos.jpg"><img alt="Lucia_Dos_Santos" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-103087" height="192" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Lucia_Dos_Santos.jpg" width="240" /></a>Bl. Lucia dos Santos as a child</blockquote>Bl. Lucia dos Santos,one of the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.fatima.org/">visionaries of Our Lady of Fatima</a>, said that in the end times, the final battle will be <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.onepeterfive.com/sister-lucia-final-confrontation-between-the-lord-and-satan-will-be-over-family-and-marriage/">over marriage and the family</a>. We are seeing this play out today with the broken state of man-woman relationships, divorce on a never before seen scale, broken families, the destruction of the institution of marriage, the sanctification of homosexuality, and the legitimization of all forms of sexual perversity. The stage is being set right now for a great battle that will soon break upon us.Indeed, the signs of this build up have been happening for at least several centuries now, beginning with the sexual revolution that, contrary to how it is presented, has actually undergone so far two stages. The first stage of the sexual revolution began during the late 18th and early 19th centuries and continued through the early 20th century. This part of the revolution was not so much about actual sexual activity, but its goal was (and which it eventually realized) was the acknowledgment that sexual behavior was not contingent upon morality, and specifically Christian morality. The goal was the acceptance of the idea that sexual morality could be defined in terms of human will. The reasons used to justify this were many, such as how different (non-Christian, of course) religions have different approaches to sexual behavior, or how morality is a matter of personal decision making, or how people simply should not interfere in people's lives if, as many have said "they aren't bothering anybody else." However, This separation of morals from actions was critical because in order to break down the purpose of sexuality, it had to be fully established in the public mind as a "fact" that sexuality was not rooted in the transcient, but rather in the material and changeable. This reduces the act to something which, having no purpose greater than that which man embues it with, allows for it to be corrupted.The second stage of the sexual revolution came much quicker, and is the one which people associate in the popular mind with the "sexual Revolution." This was the separation of the sexual act from conception. The sexual act, as the Catholic Church teaches, possesses a dual nature- it is first genitive by opening the possibility for the transmission of new life, and is is secondarily unitive, which bonds a man and woman together. The was this separation happened again began with the introduction of contraceptive devices at the end of the 19th century, but culminated in the creation of the "birth control pill." For the first time, women could choose to take a medicine over which they would have, theoretically, complete control over their fertility, making them "masters of their own destination." Conception now happened when they could choose, and by adding the element of choice in, the purpose of sexuality moved from being primarily a means for generating new life that was also enjoyable into something that was done for the sake of enjoyment itself.This change was particularly dangerous, and it brought with it a natural wave of evils that manifested during the 1970s. Abortion was the first of these, since if conception was a choice, then naturally so were the products of conception just as much a choice that could be kept or discarded at will. Since sexuality became primarily about pleasure, then naturally the pursuit of pleasure was its end, and so the idea of "whatever makes you happy" came to define sex. As the Faith teaches than men's hearts are inclined to sin and it is by Christian morality and striving for perfection that they are made right, the sexual revolution said that one should give in to one's passions and follow them as an end into themselves, which naturally leads to sin and perversity. It is not a surprise why pornography appeared in the public realm almost immediately after sexual license was established. Porn had always existed, but as something acknowledged that existed but was kept quiet and in control because porn is, essentially, a hedonistic activity as it pursues pleasure for the sake of pleasure. Since the philosophy that supports the creation of pornographic material was now given social preference and to the detriment of Christian morality, it was only natural that it would emerge in full force in public.This lead to another major change that took place from this was the potential for the acceptance of homosexuality. Again, following the same logic, if sexual pleasure can be pursued as an end unto itself, then the only wrong would be obstructing that which brings a man pleasure, especially if it is, as many people say "mutually consenting." This can include not only normal heterosexual relations, but also deviant relations. If it can include deviant relations between men and women, it logically opened another door, which we are seeing get opened even further today- why not men and men, or women and women? Animals? Children? Ultimately, there is no low too low to which one can go because, they would argue, it is not a "low" if it makes you "high."Never before in human history has their been such an explosion of infanticide, broken families, broken people, and sexual perversity in all forms. This is not to say that the nature of evil has changed, but that the same evils committed in the past were often confined to small groups in specific areas at isolated times in history. On account of modern techonology, interconnectivity, media, and transportation, these same perversities of old were able to be propagated more effectively to more people more quickly more times. If you do not believe this, which it is almost impossible to deny, look at how the pornography industry has changed over the last 50 years. 50 years ago and prior, pornography in both terms of photos and videos was difficult to come by, and for the most part included normal heterosexual relations as the most "hardcore" porn, with most of the porn being considered not even something we would say is "softcore" today. An example of this would be burlesque dancing, such as the infamous "Bettie Page" of the 1950s.<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Bettie-Page-bettie-page-31615627-452-348.jpg"><img alt="Bettie-Page-bettie-page-31615627-452-348" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-103082" height="231" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Bettie-Page-bettie-page-31615627-452-348-300x231.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Bettie-Page-bettie-page-31615627-452-348-300x231.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Bettie-Page-bettie-page-31615627-452-348.jpg 452w" width="300" /></a>"The Infamous" Bettie Page. Her videos of burlesque dancing and light bondage with other women were considered highly "risque" during the 1950s, yet today would be considered very tame.Again, this is not to say there was not "hardcore" porn of the terribly violent, disgusting type during this time- it existed, but in many areas it was not only illegal and punishable with severe penalties, but it was simply not easily available. You had to be very involved in it and "know somebody" to get it, and even that took a lot of work and risks. But comparing Bettie Page with "softcore" and normal heterosexual relations with "hardcore" today is a joke. The pornography industry, because it has become so widespread and influential, has experienced two major changes. First, is that pornography has become VERY genre specific. This was natural and expected, since as porn is meant to suit the individual "tastes" of a person, then the more one consumes the more one not only wants more of a specific "thing" to satisfy himself, but also the more one needs to stay "satisfied." If you go to any major porn website today, you will find nearly hundreds of specific categories catering that like a menu at the IHOP, you can choose from a of different sexual perversions, and you can mix-and-match as well.Since porn is the pursuit of pleasure for the sake of pleasure, it functions identical to a drug. Anybody who has used or been around drug users knows that if you use drugs for too long, you need more and heavier drugs to get the same high that you once had. The same effect replicates in porn, except you need more and stronger perversions to satisfy the self. This not only accounts for the specialization in porn today, but also for the explosive growth in violent and evil forms of porn that degrade both men and<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2010/jul/02/gail-dines-pornography"> women in truly horrble ways that have become so common that they are literally expected. For instance, in almost all "heterosexual" porn today, anal sex is a pre-requirement, when in the past it was considered extreme beyond extreme. It just gets worse from there, since practices that originally began in homosexual circles have gone mainstream heterosexual.</a> These include "ATM" (whereby a man sodomizes a woman and she immediately fellates his unwashed member after the act), Romanesque-style group sex (whereby a woman is penetrated and masturbated upon by anywhere from 2 to 10 (or more) men at the same time), and "abuse porn," where a woman is slapped, spit on, and usually forced to vomit on the "actor's" member and then made to roll in the vomit while often being sodomized.This are things, I add, that are veritably NORMAL in porn today and do not describe the more extreme things that, while not always completely accepted, are quietly accepted in the same way that the "hardcore" of the 1950s was in private.<blockquote><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Lisa_Sparxxx_at_AVN_Adult_Entertainment_Expo_2008_exp.jpg"><img alt="Lisa_Sparxxx_at_AVN_Adult_Entertainment_Expo_2008_exp" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-103083" height="300" sizes="(max-width: 201px) 100vw, 201px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Lisa_Sparxxx_at_AVN_Adult_Entertainment_Expo_2008_exp-201x300.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Lisa_Sparxxx_at_AVN_Adult_Entertainment_Expo_2008_exp-201x300.jpg 201w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Lisa_Sparxxx_at_AVN_Adult_Entertainment_Expo_2008_exp.jpg 685w" width="201" /></a><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Sparks">Lisa Hansen, a.k.a. "Lisa Sparxxx,"</a> who is representative of the changes in the porn industry. This woman holds the world record for most sexual partners in a day (919), and was on the "cutting edge" of the pornography industry's evolution over the last 15 years, participating in all of the above described perverse activities and many more.</blockquote>But as is expected, and as the pornography industry has been reporting, this growth in "extreme porn" and extreme specialization has started to cannibalize itself. Since porn is based on fantasy and not reality, that is where it makes its money, and it has been so effective in conveying fantasy to its consumers and to such an extent that it is literally becoming impossible to keep up with the demands on a human level because people are people and there are limits. Simply put, people are more than just toys for having sex with. They have personalities, physical limitations, and the ability to say no because no matter how tarnished a man or woman is, we all still possess a free will and the ability to make our own choices. Fantasy can only go so far because it always retains a root to reality. This is where the porn industry has faced its greatest and unsolvable challenge, for the more extreme the porn is the quicker the "performers" wear out of performing, and while there is a never-before-seen supply of young women who want a "career" in porn, at the same time there has never been so high of a turnover rate for the "industry."<iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/9NyzCJx4IiI?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe>Rachel Oberlin, a.k.a. "Bree Olson." Once one of Charlie Sheen's girlfriends, she promoted and participated in some of the most vile types of pornography produced today. Her story has a dual side to it, as she represents both the evil and damaging things that modern sexual liberation promotes and does to women as well as the desire, as with her, of many women who choose to enter the industry and then are upset with the consequences that come after that they bring on themselves.If one takes a solely "business" standpoint, how do you reduce this turnover in the industry? You cannot keep adding new women, because that strategy is failing, yet the demand for specialized and extreme porn is not decreasing, but increasing.This is where there lies the answer, and also the third stage of the sexual revolution that is about to break upon up. The first stage said that morality and sexuality could be separated. The second stage said that conception and pleasure could be separated from sex. The third stage will go a step further and say that sex is the self-realiztion of the deepest desires of the will as a man wills. It will be the death of the family and normal conjugal relations forever. It will forever redefine the meaning of sex and sexuality. It will be so great that it was already discussed by science fiction novels, and that the only way to fight it will be by a difficult, continual choice made on the basis of Christian morality, pitting man against the world.This third stage is the rise of the sex robot.<iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/zTv9AhCuSU4?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe>As much as this scene from the 1997 film Austin Powers is a joke of the spy films of the 1960's, the idea here is representative of the effect that sex robots will have on society- they will be as attractive to their users as they are lethal to the family and souls of individuals."Sex dolls" are nothing new throughout history. People, especially men (but also women) have masturbated with sexual proxies onto which to project their fantasies since time immemorial. Sex dolls are sold today everywhere, including on Amazon. They range in price and type, from the stereotypical "blow up doll" that high school students and college graduates throw around in an audience for fun to very expensive, truly beautifully crafted sculptures with carefully-designed anatomy intended to maximize pleasure and are truly small works of art and crafstmanship. The issue with sex robots as opposed to sex dolls is the blending of artificial intelligence with a sex doll. While a robot is never a "human" in that it cannot have a soul (and thus can never be a human), it is enough for a machine to imitate human behavior with such precision that one would mistake it for a real person. That is where the "humanization" of a machine takes place, for if a man cannot distinguish a machine from a man, he will start to treat the machine as though it were another person and may even come to think of it as a person when it truly is not.<blockquote><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/evfsbh-i.jpg"><img alt="evfsbh-i" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-103085" height="300" sizes="(max-width: 186px) 100vw, 186px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/evfsbh-i-186x300.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/evfsbh-i-186x300.jpg 186w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/evfsbh-i.jpg 281w" width="186" /></a><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/1470746413.jpg"><img alt="_1470746413" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-103084" height="300" sizes="(max-width: 285px) 100vw, 285px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/1470746413-285x300.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/1470746413-285x300.jpg 285w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/1470746413.jpg 759w" width="285" /></a>The sterotypical "blow up doll" students throw around in crowds at graduation on the left, versus a quality "sex doll" on the right that looks so realistic it could be mistaken for being human. The high-quality dolls are decreasing in price rapidly, and the next step with this is naturally their integration with  A.I.</blockquote>The effects of this humanization have major implications, and manufactures are quickly looking to integrate and improve upon this technology in order to make more money. Recently, the New York Times profiled Matthew McMullen and his company, Real Doll, which is the largest and most popular sex doll company in the world. McMullen describes his dolls as "companions," and in the interview he did with the NYT, he describes a time when sex dolls will not just become tools solely for masturbation, but something that is mistaken for a human being and with which people can form emotional attachments and relationships in the same way they would with a human.<iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/wLVOnVsLXqw?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe>This report was produced last year, but it is an excellent documentary into the future of what is coming. What you are watching is literally the process of divorcing human beings from attachment to each other and, as a result the complete destruction of the family.There are some people who are looking forward to the changes that sex robots will bring, because given the current developments and trajectory for the future, which will take some time to realize in a more complete fashion (and this is with everything- after all, a computer from 1995 is very different from a 2015 model), but when it is reached it will redefine the nature of sexual relations in ways that have never been reached before.Picture this for the future-<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3754587/Sex-robot-brothels-commonplace-streets-Britain-says-professor.html"> you walk into a brothel in the future, and as predicted, there will be no women there.</a> Prostitution in the traditional sex will have been completely eliminated, and robots will be the proxy now. Continual developments in polymer and AI technology have now made female robots almost completely indistinguishable from humans. You can choose any one or number of men or women in all different colors, shapes, and sizes, all with personalities that can be changed, to satisfy any of your deepest, most unspoken “desires.”But moving beyond desire, as mentioned above, sex robots will become life companions that people will interact with, form relationships with, and even get married to. Marriage itself will be redefined by the governments to include robots, such as in the awful move A.I.. Sex robots will eventually cease to be referred to as “sex robots” and referred to as “life companions,” and with enough time, they will be referred to as people and given human rights and treated as men are, which will have another effect even more long reaching, since it will allow for the definition of “humanity” to be re-defined by the government.<iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/Ukok0oeIFoQ?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe>This story, originally produced by TLC in 2007, shows the danger of the sex doll. While this "relationship" is unnatural, expect it to become commonplace in the future.As you can see, there are many, many, dangerous problems this will cause, but I would like to focus on one simple, “small” problem that will be faced as soon as sex robots become popularized and is already happening right now, as much of what I described are the consequences that will stem from these robots. The simple issue, the seed out of which this evil weed will grow, is that the sex robot does what the pill did but pre-intercourse. A person does not need to already be with another person, who they are attracted to and have developed a natural relationship with, and take a drug in order to avoid conception, but rather a person creates his own living an inherently sterile fantasy upon which he can project his desires so that the question of conception is never even an issue because it never had the chance to become one.This action completely removes both the genitive and unitive aspects of sexuality from sex. The person having sex with the robot has created this robot in order to accommodate to and more perfectly project his desires upon. As mentioned above, conception never was an issue because robots cannot breed. If the robot then becomes the "perfect fantasy," which of course can be substituted later with a different robot if it is desired, then there is never a reason to take the time to build a relationship with another real person who has emotions, good and bad days, and natural complexities that while difficult at times are part of our created nature as God made us, and instead we create our own reality by paying money to a factory.This is an incredibly dangerous road. If fertility rates are low right now, the sex robot will cause, worldwide, and absolute fertility collapse in all peoples, since sex affects all men regardles of race or place. Women will find themselves competing with a fantasy found in a machine to realize the unattainable, which is the perfect form. Men will to the same, pursuing the perfect vision of their pleasure, and for every woman that there may be, a better robot can be made to replace her.Remember how in the West corporations outsource work to third world nations and destroy their local economy while benefiting a few? This is the outsourcing of sexuality to robots, thereby collapsing male-female relationships and creating a dystopic world in which pleasure is the rule and families are the rarity since people would rather pursue their fantasy through sex rather than use sex for its created purpose.Families will exist by choice, not by natural events. It will further isolate and again, make marriage something done by choice, not natural action. It will destroy the conception men and women have of each other by offering them a pleasure they cannot naturally have easily and everywhere, thus making human sex boring. Machine sex will pervert the very institution of sex itself and immerse mankind in an ocean of sterile hedonism. The sex robot will be worse than the scourge of homosexuality, because it will even obviate the current state of homosexual relations, since now instead of exposing oneself to disease a sodomite can give himself a personal harem of robots that he can sodomize and be sodomized by without the risk of disease or the trouble of a relationship with another men (and for those who know gay men, which often end bitter or violently).God is the author of sex. God says in the Bible "be fruitful and multiply." God made sex- He made it good, and He is the author of sexual pleasure. God is pro-sex. He is also pro-children and pro-family, which is why He made sex- so men would have families and children. He is its author as much as He is the author of marriage and the natural order. Every perversity in sex slowly takes it away from the purpose for which He has created it an makes it into something evil.All of this talk today about how "feminism is destroying society" is really a bunch of nonsense. Feminism was most damaging during its heyday in the late 19th and early 20th century, when it achieved its goal of separating morality from sexuality. Feminism today is simply the maintenance of the changes made centuries ago in order that worse changes may be instituted. This maintenance is what allowed for the sexual revolution of the 1960s to take place, and building upon the past, the same feminism working with the 1960s sexual revolution is propelling the final stage, which is the sex robot revolution we are seeing today.In that sense, the sex robot is not an anomaly, or even unique, but quite expected- it is the advanced form of a spiritual rot that is eating the world and has naturally emerged from its circumstances just as naturally as men and women left alone will be attracted to each other. If as Bl. Lucia dos Santos said, the final battle will be over marriage and the family, then the current wave of homosexuality and transgenderism being promoted across the world will work hand-in-hand with the sex robots to completely re-define sexuality and strip it of any meaning related to family and children, making it a vehicle to sin and a blasphemy instead of a blessing, and as such it will be part of the final battle.Prepare your souls accordingly.

anonymous armageddon isis islam war World's Oldest Profession Gets The Pink Slip As People Flock To Sex Robot Brothels- We Warned You About This

It has been reported that robots are taking over jobs that used to be done by humans. Now that may even include "the world's o...

Major UK Politicians Declare To British And Irish Catholics 'Your Presence Is Unwelcome'

<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Donal-SCORCHEDEARTH.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-112677" height="228" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Donal-SCORCHEDEARTH-300x228.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Donal-SCORCHEDEARTH-300x228.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Donal-SCORCHEDEARTH.jpg 682w" width="300" /></a>England and Ireland are among some of the oldest lands in the ancient Christian world, and both have undergone considerable persecution at various points in history, be it from without or from within. Now according to a recent article, the few Christians left in the British Isles are finding themselves the subject of a growing persecution at the hands of their own governments, who see Christians and Christians as something 'no longer acceptable' in society:<blockquote>For a long time, Irish and British Catholics who might be described as orthodox or “conservative,” have been running into difficulties for their beliefs, both inside and outside the Church.What may be hinted at, here, but is not immediately apparent from the text, is that the latest wave of persecution is, by no means, confined to the orthodox and outspoken.For some time now, Catholics who publicly voiced concerns about any localized ambiguity in Church teaching— over, for example, the Divinity of Jesus or the sinfulness of contraception and homosexual acts—have been derided both by the media and within certain quarters of the Church.The carefully crafted media image of the “ideal Catholic” — from an aggressive secularist point of view — therefore, was exemplified by the former Catholic Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform in 2009, when fielding a challenge about plans to legalize same-sex civil unions, from then Drogheda-based priest Father John Hogan.Minister Dermot Ahern said, that he didn’t "bring whatever religion he has to the table," when he legislated, particularly as a Government minister.This sort of position used to be applauded by what Bishop William Crean of Cloyne, has referred to as Ireland’s “political and media establishments.”Fast forward eight years, and the very philosophy of “tolerance” once lauded by the establishment in 2009 and earlier, is no longer tolerated in 2017.It would be very unfair to Tim Farron, to suggest that, in common with the Irish former minister, he didn’t “bring whatever religion he has to the table” (in fact, Farron has a record of either abstaining or voting with anti-abortion groups in Parliament).But, by making it clear in his resignation speech that he was “a liberal to (his) fingertips” who did not consider himself to be one of those “Christians in politics who take the view that they should impose the tenets of their faith on society,” the Evangelical Christian was certainly promoting a position which, just a short time ago, would have been far more acceptable to the media establishment than it clearly is today.Indeed, in April of this year, an apparently exasperated Farron, defending himself in Parliament, claimed that he was “very proud” to have voted in favor of the U.K.’s Gay Marriage Bill in 2013, adding that the then government “did not go as far as it should have done in terms of recognizing transgender rights.”But it is not only British politicians who appear bewildered by the new turn of events. In Ireland, priests and religious not known for their conservative views have expressed shock, not only at the extent but also at the focus of much of the recent anti-Catholic sentiment.Sister Stanislaus Kennedy a well-known popular figure with the Irish media had, for example, very publicly expressed her support for a ‘Yes’ vote in the gay marriage or so-called “equality” referendum in 2015. She is also in favor of contraception. But Sister Stanislaus is also a member of the Religious Sisters of Charity, an order which until recently owned and controlled three major hospitals in Ireland.Following a relentless media campaign against plans to allow the sisters to own the planned new National Maternity Hospital, which was to be built on their grounds, the order, in spite of having the effective support of some abortion advocates, decided to end their involvement in the management of all three of their Dublin hospitals and announced their intention to hand over control and ownership to a new group that would formally comply with Irish laws rather than Catholic medical ethics.Later, a surprised and hurt sounding Sister Stanislaus, told the national broadcaster RTÉ that “it was unfair to the Sisters of Charity, a lot of things that were said” and “it's not nice to hear your order criticized wrongly, really, accused wrongly. It's not nice.”Significantly, she added, "it was very much media lead all that stuff ... absolutely."The recognition of the media agenda against the Church by someone who would be seen as a “liberal/progressive” voice in the Church is marking an unusual point of unity between “liberals” and “conservatives”, in Ireland.A similar trend can be seen in religious education in Ireland.While conservative Catholics have long had much to complain about in terms of the poor standards of religious formation in Catholic schools, there is now a strong media campaign against laws decried as ‘discriminatory’ which, in reality, help protect the ethos of such schools, even where much of the damage to this ethos has already been done and has been self-inflicted — a Catholic school for girls in Dublin, for example, recently, decided to remove the cross from its insignia lest it would cause offence.This campaign is in parallel with moves to divest Catholic schools and transfer ownership to groups with a secular ideology.The message is clear, in Ireland and in Britain, alike, the persecution of the Christian faith has just been ratcheted up a notch. Christianity, no matter what form it takes, has now become unacceptable to the political and media establishments.Does this represent a scorched earth policy by the forces of secularism to pre-empt even the possibility of the return of an overwhelmingly faith-filled “Catholic Ireland” or “Dowry of Mary,” for example? It would certainly seem so.In any case, after several years of seeing people of faith not bringing their religious beliefs to the table of public policy, and being put to the top of the class for their tolerance, it now appears that not just the publicly expressed beliefs of Christians but Christians themselves, “domesticated” or otherwise, are no longer welcome at that table either. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ncregister.com/blog/donalol/anti-christian-persecution-is-gaining-strength-in-ireland-and-great-britain">source</a>)</blockquote>Back in 2010, accusations of sexual abuse and misconduct in Ireland <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sexual_abuse_scandal_in_Ireland">exploded into a full scale crisis</a> detailing what began in the USA scarcely a decade earlier. Certainly many of these crimes were real and needed to be reported on.  That said, know that the reason why such a deal was made about the sexual abuse crisis in Ireland was not because they actually care about the Church. Just like the National Socialists, these people are using real facts as a means to leverage support for anti-Christian persecution, beginning with the Church and spreading to the entire society.This situation in England and Ireland has been building for a long time, and those who are actively pursuing a renewed persecution of the Church will use any means possible to achieve their own ends, which is ultimately the destruction of Christianity.Likewise, if you have good information about a priest, bishop, or member of the clergy who is involved in homosexual activity, who is abusing children, or is using his power to advance the agenda of Sodom and Gomorrah, please contact us so that we can expose the evil agents who have infiltrated the Church and draw them out as a doctor draws poison from a wound.

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Major UK Politicians Declare To British And Irish Catholics 'Your Presence Is Unwelcome'

England and Ireland are among some of the oldest lands in the ancient Christian world, and both have undergone considerable persecution...

Children In Britain Are Being Sent To Clinics To Be Told That They Are Transgender

<div id="attachment_112675" style="width: 676px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ac_trans_comp.jpg"><img alt="" class=" wp-image-112675" height="438" sizes="(max-width: 666px) 100vw, 666px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ac_trans_comp-1024x673.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ac_trans_comp-1024x673.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ac_trans_comp-300x197.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ac_trans_comp-768x505.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ac_trans_comp.jpg 1056w" width="666" /></a>Danni McFadyen, little boy who now dresses as a girl in the UK. Absolute perversion</div>Children in Britain are being sent to clinics to be told that they are transgender, as we read in <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.christianpost.com/news/number-of-uk-children-sent-to-gender-clinics-quadruples-forced-to-unlearn-boy-girl-differences-191486/">one report</a>:<blockquote>The number of children being referred to gender identity clinics in the U.K. has quadrupled in the past five years, statistics show, with even the youngest of children being encouraged to question their sex."It has become an industry, people are making a career out of encouraging children to question gender at an age when they need to be left to be children. When teachers raise these issues children can become confused or unhappy and traumatized by it," said Chris McGovern, a former adviser to the Department for Education, in an article for The Telegraph on Saturday.The Telegraph said that statistics it obtained from the Gender Identity Development Service shows that 84 children aged between three and seven were referred to the clinic in 2016, while only 20 received such a referral in 2012/2013.Moreover, the number of children under the age of four referred to gender clinics has also increased, from 36 in 2012/13 to 165 in 2016.As a whole, there were 2,016 referrals for youngsters aged between three and 18 last year, which is more than six times the 314 referrals from 2012.GIDS reportedly offers action plans for children following six months of psycho-social assessment by a clinician, which can lead to children who have started puberty being prescribed hormone blockers.Youngsters over the age of 16 could also be given cross-sex hormones, designed to give them the physical characteristics of the opposite sex.</blockquote>This is absolute perversion. These children are utterly wicked. The parents who encourage this behavior should be arrested and executed, and the children should be rehabilitated. If they cannot be rehabilitated, well the Bible makes it very clear: "Then all the men of his city shall stone him to death with stones; so you shall put away the evil from among you, and all Israel shall hear and fear." (Deuteronomy 21:21) And also: "And whoever blasphemes the name of the Lord shall surely be put to death." (Leviticus 24:16) But the people of Great Britain will never accept the divine law, because they have been utterly corrupted, through protestantism and darwinism. They keep talking about "Sharia law" taking over England, but they will never talk about sodomite sharia. That is because this jabbering about "Sharia law" is a distraction to the reality that Sodom is conquering the world. Who shall fight it back? I have not seen any. Bring back the Inquisition.

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Children In Britain Are Being Sent To Clinics To Be Told That They Are Transgender

Danni McFadyen, little boy who now dresses as a girl in the UK. Absolute perversion Children in Britain are being sent to clinics to be...

Muslim Terrorists In Somalia Kidnap 9 Christians, Take Knives And 'Slaughter Them Like Chickens'

<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/aslhabad-exec.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-112672" height="169" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/aslhabad-exec-300x169.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/aslhabad-exec-300x169.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/aslhabad-exec.jpg 627w" width="300" /></a>The infamous Somali terrorist group Al-Shabaab has been 'hunting down' Christians and other non-Muslims. They kidnapped nine Christians and then took knives and slaughtered them 'like chickens' according to a recent report:<blockquote>Al-Shabaab, the deadliest terrorist group in Africa according to experts, beheaded nine civilians in a village in Kenya while searching for non-Muslims.The Associated Press reported on Saturday that the attack occurred in the Jima village in Lamu County, when about 15 radical extremists seized nine men before beheading them."They were slaughtered like chicken using knives. Something similar to what happened in Mpeketoni in 2014. We suspect there are many bodies that haven't been recovered," a police source told Kenya's the Star, referring to the terrorist group's slaughter of more than 60 people in 2014 near Mpeketoni.The militants were apparently looking for "non-Muslims," but many civilians had fled as fears of the terrorist group's growing presence in the region spread. The Kenya Red Cross helped with the evacuations.One resident, identified as Kaingu Kadzomba, shared that the militants were "only targeting male non-Muslims."The Somali-based terrorist group, which has specifically slaughtered Christians on a number of occasions, has carried out many attacks in Kenya over the past few years.Rarely had they carried out beheadings, however, security officials said, which is a method of execution most now associate with the Islamic State terrorist group.In recent months, al-Shabaab killed at least 47 people in Lamu and Mandera counties, increasingly using homemade bombs in its attacks, AP reported.(<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.christianpost.com/news/al-shabaab-beheads-9-civilians-in-kenya-as-it-hunts-for-non-muslims-men-slaughtered-like-chickens-191484/">source</a>)</blockquote>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Muslim Terrorists In Somalia Kidnap 9 Christians, Take Knives And 'Slaughter Them Like Chickens'

The infamous Somali terrorist group Al-Shabaab has been 'hunting down' Christians and other non-Muslims. They kidnapped nine Ch...

'Christ Is For Cucks, Real Men Follow The Example Of Satan And Make Their Own Morality' Major National Socialist Website Boldly Promotes Satanic Principles

Not much surprises me coming out of the National Socialist movement today. However, in an article on Daily Stormer that recently came out against alt-right Internet commentator Jack Posobiec entitled "Jack Posobiec is a Textbook Rat F*cker And Is Hurting the Trump Movement, there is the following statement that was a surprising admission as it was made openly:<blockquote>I want to state clearly off the bat that I personally consider morality itself to always be a pragmatic and scientific endeavor. I believe high-minded moral principles to be decadent and selfish. For the inverse of “the ends justify the means” is “the means justify the ends” – that is to say, one justifies losing and failing to accomplish his goals by claiming he kept to moral principles.Again, this is just my personal view – but I view failure itself as the real immorality. If your goals are related to the greater good – and if you are a man of honor then they certainly should be – then by failing you are letting others down. If you say “well I only failed others because I was being true to what I believed to be right,” then you have selfishly harmed others for the sake of a personal indulgence.In my mind, “the ends do not justify the means” morality is something that the boomers embraced out of selfishness, the desire to avoid the harsh reality that is a part of life. In real, adult life, you are sometimes required to make choices that make you feel bad.That having been said, even one who takes a non-pragmatic approach to morality (i.e., a boomer) surely has reason enough to justify viewing modern politics as an amoral affair where dirty tricks are simply part of the game. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.dailystormer.com/jack-posobiec-is-a-textbook-ratfucker-and-he-is-hurting-the-trump-movement/">source</a>)</blockquote>As you will notice, there is no point here when he says "I WORSHIP SATAN" explicitly. To the contrary, he keeps his explicit religious views private. However, no matter what one says he believes or does not believe in, a man's beliefs are made clear by the positions he support or does not support. For example, a man might say he is Catholic, but if he publicly supports gravely sinful actions that are explicitly against that which the faith he claims to adhere to teaches, then he is either ignorant (certainly possible), or he is willingly giving consent to evil deeds. This can be said about many things, for when a man's professed beliefs or idea do not accord or do not seem to accord with that which he teaches, one needs to look closer.<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/pelosi.jpeg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-112661" height="169" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/pelosi.jpeg" width="299" /></a>CA Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi. She claims to be a "Catholic" yet is an ardent  supporter of abortion. She is just one of many examples of people who claim they hold one set of beliefs when their actions dictate otherwise.Satanism is the explicit worship of the evil spirit who rebelled against God put himself into perpetual opposition to him along with the hosts of spiritual beings who followed him and now goes about seeking the destruction of human souls by obtaining their willing consent to follow his ways into misery and perdition. It is what St. Peter referred to as the roaring lion who goes about seeking whosoever he may devour, and is why in the St. Michael Prayer (full version) it is written:“O Glorious Prince of the heavenly host, St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in the battle and in the terrible warfare that we are waging against the principalities and powers, against the rulers of this world of darkness, against the evil spirits. Come to the aid of man, whom Almighty God created immortal, made in His own image and likeness, and redeemed at a great price from the tyranny of Satan. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.traditioninaction.org/religious/b009rpMichael.htm">full version here</a>)Satanism has existed throughout history, and in recent times it has become very popular and continues to grow in the Western world as Christianity's presence recedes. As Satanists themselves note and have noted, satanism does not per se necessitate an explicit worship of the devil in the obvious sense, such as through the participation in satanic rituals, black masses, or worship of the devil as the horned being he is portrayed as. Satanism is as much a philosophy as it is a religion, and many persons who call themselves "satanists" are admitted atheists who claim they see satanism as a form of secular or atheistic rejection of Christianity and Christian morality, asserting that as the devil declared himself to be equal to or greater than God through his declaration that he could define right and wrong, so is the satanist a person who rejects all moral authority and makes himself his own moral authority.Historically speaking, all forms of occultism, divination, and paganism are forms of the worship of demons have been condemned as they sought power outside of God. Likewise, a distinction has always been made by the Church between pagan peoples who, without knowledge of the True Faith, attempted to know and follow God even though their ways in which they pursued it were erroneous, for as Christ imparted divine revelation to man that he would not have known unless he had come, and that the law of God is written on the hearts of all men, these men must be distinguished from those who sought to use religion or claims of religion as a means of power to control the masses of men for their personal benefit at the expense of the many. It is why wherever Christians went they preached the Gospel, and why many pagans converted, because what the were seeking but could not find is perfectly found in the revelation Christ made known to men. Much of the condemnation of the paganism is not merely because it is error, but because it is about power through which men attempt to make themselves gods among men.The Church has been in an incessant war against paganism since the beginning of her establishment and will continue until Christ returns, as to reject Christ and persist in paganism after the Gospel has been preached is to willingly persist in error, to reject the message of salvation and instead work to be an advocate and agent for perdition. It is the reason why Christians historically waged war against pagan tribes just as the Hebrews, God's chosen people of the Old Testament, waged war on the heathen tribes of Canaan and the surrounding areas, because their practices were evil and worthy of death. By the Hebrews bringing earthly justice to them at the Lord's command, they carried out the justice of God just as the many people who turned to the Hebrew religion, while not being Hebrews by birth themselves, were themselves saved by the mercy of God carried out in the same way. God is Love, and as love is both mercy and justice, and that God became man so that man became like God, it is or man to become like God by so according himself to His will that he beings to reflect God's mercy and God's justice in his earthy life that will continue into eternity.Many have opposed the Church throughout history from antiquity through today. Some have been outright pagans. Some apostatized from the Faith. Some were occultists. Many were the countless heretics that have existed throughout history, and indeed it was out of many heresies that the fuller apostasies and problems came. Some were atheists. Some were "secularists." All of them believed they could redefine morality in their own terms on some level, and all of them rejected the Church's teachings because they saw them as obstructions to their own goal. Satanism as seen today has existed therefore in both the historical, literal practice of demon worship as well as in the support of philosophies which promote the greatness and worship of the self over and as a substitution for God.While modern satanism dates from the late 16th and early 17th century, much of the philosophy as it applies to the "atheistic satanism" emerged in the 19th century closed tied to Darwinian Philosophy. Darwin's philosophy, while not outwardly supporting satanism, was itself satanic because by proposing that man is essentially a rational animal no different than any other beast, he is just another creature whose sense of right and wrong is a trained reaction to environmental stimuli created to serve its situations that is not based on any sort of objective end. Aside from being used to support racial and cultural theories, it naturally gives support to paganism and demon worship because  it  justifies the creation of a personal, subjective morality just as the demons rebelled because they wanted to define what is wrong and right for themselves.The 19th century book <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://ia800306.us.archive.org/31/items/MightIsRight_966/MightIsRight.pdf">Might Is Right</a> by Ragnar Redbeard, which was heavily plagiarized by Anton Lavey's "Satanic Bible," the book dedicates the entire first chapter and many part of the book to decrying Christian morality, saying it is for "losers" who use it as an excuse for their "failure" and in which he calls for the "Northern Race" to liberate itself by casing off morality and defining in terms of  the "rational" option, which is that morality is the force of a man's will on another to what he wants:<blockquote>How is it that “men of light and leading” hardly ever call in question the manufactured “moral codes,” under which our once vigorous Northern race is slowly and surely eating out its heart in peaceful inaction and laborious dry-rot? Standard “moral principles” are arbitrarily assumed by their orthodox apologist to be a fixed and unalterable quantity, and that to doubt the divine-rightness of these “principles” is treason and sacrilege. When the greatest thinkers of a race are incapable, or afraid to perform their manifest and logical function, it is scarcely to be wondered that average citizens are also somewhat unwilling to “risk life, fortune and sacred honor” for the overthrow of popularized “right and wrong” concepts, that they know from bitter personal experience, are unworkable falsities. Although the average man feels in his heart that nearly all political and religious conventionalisms are dynamic deceits, yet how cautiously he avoids any open display of antagonism thereto? He has not the courage of his opinions. He is afraid to say openly what he thinks secretly. In other words he is living in a state of subjectiveness; of vassalage. He allows his brain to be dominated and held in bondage by the brain of another. From his infancy he has been deliberately subjected to a continuous external pressure, especially designed to coerce his understanding into strict accord with pre-arranged views of moral, political or religious “duty.” He has not been permitted one moment of real mental liberty. (Page 4)All ethics, politics and philosophies are pure assumptions, built upon assumptions. They rest on no sure basis. They are but shadowy castles-in-the-air erected by day-dreamers, or by rogues, upon nursery fables. It is time they were firmly planted upon an enduring foundation. This can never be accomplished until the racial mind has first been thoroughly cleansed and drastically disinfected of its depraved, alien, and demoralizing concepts of right and wrong. In no human brain can sufficient space be found, for the relentless logic of hard fact, until all pre-existent delusions have been finally annihilated. (Page 7)Masterful men laugh with contempt at spiritual thunders, and have no occasion to dread the decisions of any human tribunal. They are above and beyond all that. Laws and regulations are only for conquered vassals. The free man does not require them. He may manufacture and post up Decalogue regulations, to bind and control dependents with, but he does not himself bow down before those inventions of his own hands, — except as a lure. Statute books and golden rules, were made to fetter slaves and fools. Very useful are they, for controlling the herds of sentenced convicts, who fill the factories and cultivate the fields. All moral principles therefore are the servitors, not the masters of the strong. Power made moral codes, and Power abrogates them. A man is under no obligation to obey anything or anybody. It is only serving-men that must obey, because they are caitiffs by birth, breeding, and condition. Morals are only required in an immoral community, that is to say a community held in a state of conquest. (Page 10)Human rights and wrongs are not determined by Justice, but by Might. Disguise it as you may, the naked sword is still king-maker and king-breaker, as of yore. All other theories are lies and — lures. Therefore! If you would conquer wealth and honor, power and fame, you must be practical, grim, cool and merciless. You must ride to success (by preference) over the necks of your foemen. Their defeat is your strength. Their downfall is your uplifting. Only the powerful can be free, and Power is non-moral. Life is real, life is earnest, and neither heaven nor hell its final goal. And love, and joy, and birth, and death, and fate, and strife, shall be forever. This earth is a vast whirl of warring atoms — a veritable revolving cock-pit. Each molecule, each animal, fights for its life. You must fight for yours, or surrender. Look well to it, therefore, that your beaks and spurs, your fangs and claws are as sharp as steel, and as effective as science can make them. (Page 12)Woe unto those that stumble! Woe unto Ye who fall! They who accept the “Equality, Faith, Hope, and Charity” ideal, in any shape or form whatever, interpret the facts of mortal life as they are not — as they have ever been, as they can never be. Indeed when the animal world becomes ‘moralized’ and ‘equalized’ it will be extinct. No doubt when contemplating the dark side of all this, Pascal was impelled to write with superstitious medieval diapason: — ‘I am affrighted like a man who in his sleep has been carried unto some horrible desert island, and there awakes, not knowing where he is, nor how he shall escape.’ Degenerates only are thus affrighted at the tragic majesty of their surroundings. (Page 51)</blockquote>There is an inherent overlap between racism, Darwinism, paganism, and satanism, because all come from the same root which is the rejection of absolute truth and the reduction of truth to a personal standard which a man follows as he defines on his own terms, and heresy is one of the common ways through which these evil enter into Christian or formerly Christian societies. One cannot say the National Socialists acted in a philosophically isolated manner with their embrace of paganism, racialism, and darwinism. To the contrary, they were logically consistent in carrying out that which they followed and had been already firmly established before them. The same applies to Andrew Anglin's writings above, as he is, to his credit, expressing the same philosophy which is the basis of the National Socialists, the anti-clericalists, the eugenicists, and the demon worshippers from ancient times.Observe how in his post he blames Baby Boomers for using "morality" as the excuse for their failure as a generation. To Anglin's credit, many times his criticism of them Boomers is justified and good, and it even reflects many of the positions we have held on Shoebat.com. However as we have been constantly saying, the evil of National Socialism is not that it rejects controversial facts, but that it embraces them an expects persecution because for the National Socialist, these true but culturally "unacceptable" facts are but vehicles for seducing the intellectually inclined, as after people finally admit that the facts given are true, it is at that point that the poison is adminstered, and that is to offer National Socialism as the answer to the problems mentioned. Other times, the National Socialists will tell the truth but will add a *tiny* lie into the discussion o the truth, so much that it is difficult to notice unless one looks carefully, and in combination with the small lie a discussion can be leveraged to reach a conclusion of National Socialism.Nobody can argue at all that the Boomers cared about morality at all. Born between 1945 and 1964 and therefore coming of age (which I will define as being between the ages of 15 and 25) between 1960 and 1989, nobody who lived through that age can argue that "morality" was valued. To the contrary, this was the period of the great rebellion in American, European, and many societies throughout the world. It was the age of "sex, drugs, and rock and roll," a time of unprecedented hedonism, occultism, socialism and disordered behavior at a time when America was also at the height of its economic prosperity that was fueled by the same generation for at least several more decades by profligate debt-spending, borrowing, and monetary creation that has created the largest wage inequalities and debt accumulations which the world has ever seen and only now is beginning to fall apart, as it has been slowly collapsing under its own weight since the financial crisis of 2008. He claims that the boomers took a "non-pragmatic approach to morality," and one must argue that is true in that they did not think about the future of their children or society because it is an obvious fact they did not- no responsible parent accumulates mountains of debt and then dumps the bill on their kids. However, at the same time it is an absolute lie because by their rejection of morality they made their own morality in which they could justify their selfish actions and then, theoretically, exonerate themselves of any responsibility for their mess. The mention of the Boomers in this piece was fundamentally a distraction from his writings on morality, which was to advocate for the same philosophy which defines darwinism as much as satanism.In <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://ia800306.us.archive.org/31/items/MightIsRight_966/MightIsRight.pdf">Might is Right</a>, Redbeard writes openly of his hatred of Christ:Behold the crucifix, what does it symbolize?Pallid incompetence hanging on a tree. (Page 3)"Pallid incompetence" is 19th century language for a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuckservative">cuck</a>. If objective morality, laying down's one life for the sake of righteousness, and the sacrifice which Christ made is "pallid incompletence," and if true "freedom" is found in the promotion of one's own man-made morality, then the conclusion is clear. It means that in terms of its philosophy, the emergent National Socialist movement has just admitted that it views Christ as a "cuck" but satan and his demonic hordes as models of strength because they view themselves as gods and the rest of humanity as animals to subjugate.

anonymous armageddon isis islam war 'Christ Is For Cucks, Real Men Follow The Example Of Satan And Make Their Own Morality' Major National Socialist Website Boldly Promotes Satanic Principles

Not much surprises me coming out of the National Socialist movement today. However, in an article on Daily Stormer that recently came ...

Muslim Terrorists Find Nine People, And Saw Off Their Heads "Like Chickens."

Muslim terrorists found nine people and sawed off their heads "like chickens." As we read <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.christianpost.com/news/al-shabaab-beheads-9-civilians-in-kenya-as-it-hunts-for-non-muslims-men-slaughtered-like-chickens-191484/">in report</a>:<blockquote>Al-Shabaab, the deadliest terrorist group in Africa according to experts, beheaded nine civilians in a village in Kenya while searching for non-Muslims.The Associated Press reported on Saturday that the attack occurred in the Jima village in Lamu County, when about 15 radical extremists seized nine men before beheading them."They were slaughtered like chicken using knives. Something similar to what happened in Mpeketoni in 2014. We suspect there are many bodies that haven't been recovered," a police source told Kenya's the Star, referring to the terrorist group's slaughter of more than 60 people in 2014 near Mpeketoni.The militants were apparently looking for "non-Muslims," but many civilians had fled as fears of the terrorist group's growing presence in the region spread. The Kenya Red Cross helped with the evacuations.One resident, identified as Kaingu Kadzomba, shared that the militants were "only targeting male non-Muslims."The Somali-based terrorist group, which has specifically slaughtered Christians on a number of occasions, has carried out many attacks in Kenya over the past few years.Rarely had they carried out beheadings, however, security officials said, which is a method of execution most now associate with the Islamic State terrorist group.In recent months, al-Shabaab killed at least 47 people in Lamu and Mandera counties, increasingly using homemade bombs in its attacks, AP reported.Back in May, suspected al-Shabaab radicals shot dead a Christian teacher at an elementary school in northeastern Kenya."The suspected al-Shabaab militants entered the school compound and right away fired on the teacher who was teaching the pupils," said a Somali Muslim teacher, who asked not to be named.A source noted at the time that another Muslim teacher saved the life of a second Christian teacher who was about to be killed, though both men were kidnapped as a result.The Africa Center for Strategic Studies named al-Shabaab the deadliest group in Africa in June, estimating that it killed as many as 4,000 people in 2016.In April 2015, the terrorists slaughtered nearly 150 students, most of them Christians, in an attack at Kenya's Garissa University College.Reuters reported last week that the U.S. military continues carrying out air strikes against the al-Qaeda-linked group on its bases in Somalia."We will continue to assess the results of the operation and will provide additional information as appropriate," the U.S. military's Africa Command said in a statement, concerning an air strike on July 2."Specific details about the units involved and assets used will not be released in order to ensure operational security."Al-Shabaab has reportedly lost control of most of Somalia's cities and towns since being pushed out of the capital, Mogadishu, in 2011, but it continues carrying out major gun and bomb attacks across the region.</blockquote>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Muslim Terrorists Find Nine People, And Saw Off Their Heads "Like Chickens."

Muslim terrorists found nine people and sawed off their heads "like chickens." As we read in report : Al-Shabaab, the deadlie...