Horrific Massacre Revealed On Film: Muslim Terrorists Kidnap Innocent Man And Brutally Butcher Him Alive 0 A horrific massacre was revealed on film: Muslim terrorists in the Philippines butchered an innocent man alive. You can see this ritual human sacrifice here: The world is becoming more and more of a savage and sadistic place. The cause of this is paganism and the acceptance of homosexuality. Even the Right-wing is promoting homosexuality. Recently, Right-wing radio host Dennis Prager said that bisexuality is "the norm" and that the Bible teaches that man can be just as happy with boys as with girls:Paganism is being promoted by the co-called "Counter-jihad" movement. Lets start with Jihad Watch's Robert Spencer whom despite being officially Catholic is not attacked by any of the Rome-exposing Evangelicals. They say nothing of his activism partnering with Sigurfreyr Jonasson who is steeped into the darkest brand of the occult: Crowleyism. Is it any wonder why devil covers for devil?Who in the U.S. even tracks such connections? Most Americans do not even know how to pronounce the name Sigurfreyr much track his activism, official partnership and dealings with Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller.The moment Spencer knew we were tracking them where Sigurfreyr Jonasson was listed as a member on Spencer's SIOE (an organization that we have exposed extensively as being ran by and associated with Nazis and criminals in Europe) they instantly removed his name from the list, but we were faster than their tracking and we managed to get a snapshot for proof:Snapshot from Spencer and Geller's SIOE's Facebook page revealing Jonasson of Nordic Wolf Design as partner with Spencer and GellerBut besides this photo, when you go to the official Facebook for SIOE's Icelandic branch SIOC (Stop the Islamization of Iceland) you will find that numerous times it shared the work of Icelandic politician Valdimar H Jóhannesson, another organizer of the event for Vakur whom Spencer spoke for which seals this collaboration.Spencer and JohannessonThe occultist, Sigurfreyr Jonasson even comments on Spencer's articles. Anyone can click his name from Jihad Watch to see the slip from Spencer's post about how he was going to Iceland:Sigufreyr says Robert Spencer is not linked to Richard Spencer, but Spencer's partner, Sigufreyr is fascinated with both Spencers as you shall seeWhen one clicks on Sigurfreyr's name, one is taken directly to Sigurfreyr's official website, which is filled with articles on eugenics and the occult.In fact, all who read Spencer only know that Spencer 'visited Iceland'. He wrote reports to scrub and cleanse his host Vakur from liberal attacks while concealing that Sigurfreyr Jonasson and Vakur are major movers and shakers who work the ropes from SIOE's headquarters in Denmark.While some might falsely argue a "guilt by association," Spencer still continues to partner with neo-Nazis to this day even after being notified and their names are still on the official Facebook of SIOE.But why does he conceal this connection, and who in the U.S. is looking out for you tracking the organizers for these Northern European events that Spencer attends? Actually no one tracks these connections. Sigurfreyr Jonasson is not some 'Islamophobe' but an Icelandic occultist, eugenist and neo-Nazi who runs the organization under which the event was organized, called Vakur (there is an Icelandic report on Vakur that you can read here).According to Icelandic journalist Ágúst Borgþór Sverrisson, Sigurfreyr Jonasson is the organizer for Vakur. But he is kept hidden. All you are supposed to consume is this:Photo from Vakur's website advertising the event with SpencerIt took some homework, but our sources in Iceland were able to obtain a photo of Robert Spencer's partner and colleague, Sigurfreyr Jonasson in a t-shirt. And what it shows should reveal everything you need to know:According to the company’s official website, Sigurfreyr Jonasson is the head of the “International Web Design Team” for Nordic Wolf, and “has published numerous articles on the web, on topics such as psychology, pedagogy, judicial matters, history, mysticism, drug policy, and the drug war.”And by “mysticism” it is speaking of Sigurfreyr Jonasson’s deep involvement in the occult. Sigurfreyr Jonasson is so steeped into satanic activities, rituals and weird fascinations that on his Pinterest page one will find it filled with disturbing images; utter satanism, an abhorrence for Christianity and love for occultism. From cluttered dark images of upside-down crosses to the infamous occultist Aleister Crowley, Baphomet and other demons the man is a nightmare:Jonasson's Pinterest page reveals his fascination and liking for swastikas:Here is a closeup shot:On his website, he wrote an article entitled, “Witches — Their Discipline and Liturgy” in which he describes disturbing and sinister occultic rituals. In the beginning of the article, Jonasson writes:“In many western cities, if you carefully search, you can find a collection of people who take part in the secrecy of the Norse.”In one part of the article he describes the use of sex, and even “swallowing semen”, for ritual occultism and witchcraft. He writes:“In the north, sex and swallowing is a good part of the liturgy of some rules. In some congregations, sexuality is purely symbolic in nature. In that case, a pen is put into a jar filled with red wine, and participants say that ‘the woman's position is the same as the candle.’”Image of Jonasson's article on sex rituals and occultismLater on in the article, Jonasson describes a very vile and homosexual ritual designed by the famous occultist, Aleister Crowley, in which an occult priest kisses the initiate in the genitals and other parts of his body. Here is Jonasson’s description of this degenerate rite:“In ceremony to the first degree, the newcomer is brought naked into the mood where the admission takes place. He has a cloth for his eyes and his hands are tied behind him. The chief priest or priest reads him a magic word. Then the newcomer gets the fivefold kiss. He kisses his legs, knees, genitals, breasts and lips.Then he's struck forty-four whacks with a whip. Consequently, the secrecy, confidentiality and obedience of the rule are the answer. When the day has been completed, the cloth is taken from the eyes of the newcomer and his hands are solved. He now handles various equipment used in magic spells and is the meaning and role assigned to him.”Here is a photo of this occult and diabolical article written by Robert Spencer's colleague, Sigurfreyr Jonasson:He then goes on to describe a ritual with bread and wine, designed to deliberately mock and evilly corrupt the Catholic Mass. In this ritual, the bread is, at times, even made with blood, as Jonasson himself writes:“The ‘wine and kitchen port’, however, reminds us of the ordinance of Catholicism aimed at reminding us of Christ's sacrifice on the cross. In this ceremony, the priest gives bread and wine, which in the eyes of the faithful turns into the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ.In the north, both the bread and the wine are blessed by the high priest. The bread or cake used is made from salt, honey, wine, flour, oil and in some cases blood.”Sex rituals are further written on by Jonasson: “Through sexual intercourse, the person communicates with the primary forces that he can not experience in other ways.”Jonasson ends the article by revealing: “In Iceland there are at least two groups of men and women engaged in the education and rituals of Norway. However, they choose to work in a quiet place.”This indicates that Jonasson has a knowledge on the occult secret society in Iceland who “work in a quiet place”. They don’t want to be known, yet he knows of them, and of their rituals quite intimately.Sigurfreyr is personal friends with Elísabet Olka Guðmundsdóttir, a witch and devil worshipper in Iceland. Here she proudly shows off a tattoo of a pentagram. She posed with the tattoo, with Sigurfreyr commenting that the pentagram is "brillijant!": Here is a photo of Jonasson posted by Elisabet, on which Sigurfreyr comments by calling himself "Mr. Skinless Hyde," referencing the deranged character, "Jackal and Hyde."There is a photo of Sigurfreyr as ringleader sitting next to the witch (on his right):Robert Spencer's partner, makes obvious his occult circles in Iceland. His photos with an ordained witch reveals an intimate involvement especially when he was present in an occult ritual, an experience that he wrote about in an article published on his site entitled, "Satan is a life, light and thrill."Sigurfreyr recounts his experience in the ritual to reveal the brand of Christianity he secretly promotes:"We are in an abandoned farm in the vicinity of the capital, and there stands an altar of Satan. It is draped with purple cloth, full of mysterious symbols. The altar is magnificent, all the ógnvægleg. She carries a goat head with a crown on his head. On the altar are various objects; skulls, black candles, a dagger and a cross. The cross is inverted. Cold shivers run down my spine to see the most sacred symbol of our Christians in the center of the altar of the devil. The altar stands under the open sky. It is Villa Reale, moon peeks through the clouds and sheds light on three magical beings around the altar. On the altar's fire in the middle of the candle, he describes the altarpiece. In front of the fire is braziers, that feel bad smelling smoke. It's like that peculiar odor or an underscore - rather an amount that is eerily an atmosphere that prevails there. The ceremony is about to begin, the Witch orders. A young girl kneels in a white robe to her ankles. Her hands are tied behind her back and a black cloth is on her eyes. On either side of her stand a man and a woman. The man is in a mask, which resembles a pig's head, and a black robe with a golden five-arm on the back. The woman wears a purple robe, however. They all seem naked under the tunic. They are within a circle in the market with the turf purple powder. Suddenly the woman turns to me, where I'm standing outside the circle, and says in a commanding voice: 'Turn thou away. Protect your very soul.' I believe it moderately but decide to stop at nothing."In the interview, Jonasson asks the witch who was guiding the ritual:"You were with a picture of a goat and a cross which was upside down in the middle of the altar. Now goats have long been associated with human ideas about the devil. Are you devil worshipers?"But her denial is the same denial as when you ask these activists 'are you Nazis?' They will instantly deny it. Similarly To Jonasson's question the witch says:"No, not in the traditional sense of the word. The shepherd god, the goat, is an everlasting sign of power and wisdom. She is before Christ's day. The church later moved to the idea of the devil, and then it had a horn and tail to blacken the goat. Since then people have confused this. The pride of a divine being that ancient Egyptians called Shaitan. Christians call him Satan and say he is an opponent. Nothing is so far from the truth. Satan is not an enemy of man but life, light and thrill. He is the source of all that is worth seeking out. His power makes men wise. We receive notices that make men go to sleep, and their lives are joyful. Everything else is hypocrisy. "Jonasson then asks the witch about sex rituals, to which she says that "sex is an essential element in ceremonies and various other liturgical principles." Jonasson then asks the witch about the use of drugs in occult rituals, which is interesting given the fact that Jonasson is amongst the biggest drug pushers in Iceland, for its use in the occult. The witch then tells Jonasson:"The educational principle is discussed in detail of plants and various types of fungi that can be used to open a deeper level of mind awareness. The use of these plants will have to follow certain rules if it is to go. Their effects are spectacular and can be dangerous in some cases. Some of these products will enable us to free the consciousness of the body and travel to other places. These witches have done this for centuries. To this can be attributed to notions of witches flying through the kústsköftum. We fly on the wings of the mind. We do not have the imagination, as some claim, but literally. Furthermore, the use of herbs for medicinal purposes to remedy mental disorders such as depression, shyness, indifference and lead. Then we have used crystals and various kinds of stones to strengthen us, give us endurance and courage. All this has given good results."Jonasson talking with a witch about drug rituals, sheds further light as to why he is a heavy promoter of drug use, if not, he is the biggest promoter of drugs in Iceland.Here is the cover of Sigurfreyr Jonasson's online book pushing to legalize dangerous narcotics:Photo of the front cover of Sigurfreyr Jonasson's book on his drug endeavorsThere is one paragraph in the book that really reveals Jonasson's agenda, targeting youths and legalizing dangerous drugs like MDMA or amphetamine, the very drug that Robbert Spencer claims to have been poisoned with. Jonasson says in his book:The target group of sigurfreyr.com are 1) people (laymen as well as professionals) who are critical of the present drug policy, 2) young people who want to see a change in the stigma surrounding illegal drug use and 3) people who use cannabis (hashish, marijuana) or other illegal drugs (MDMA, amphetamine) as self-medication and want to see it become part of legal pharmacopoeia again.Sigurfreyr co-founded a major drug pushing organization called Snarrótin, or the Icelandic Civil Liberties Union (ICLU). Sigurfreyr invited British drug pusher named David Nutt, one of the biggest drug advocates on earth, to speak for his Snarrotin organization. Nutt is also a big advocate for assisted suicide. In one interview, Nutt was asked: "Do you support doctor assisted suicide?" Nutt replied: "Yes, if you mean euthanasia. People have as much right to a peaceful and pain-free death as they do to life prolonging treatments."Nutt is also one of the biggest pushers for the use of psilocybin, a hallucinogenic drug that is classified as a class-A narcotic. In Great Britain, Nutt, according to one report, "has held government advisory posts for the Ministry of Defence, Department of Health and the Home Office." Now Nutt is an advocate for the use of drugs, specifically MDMA, or ecstasy, the very drug found in Robert Spencer's blood. Here is one video in which he expresses his support for the legalization of MDMA, and talks about how scientists can change the law to legalize this drug:Nutt believes that MDMA should be available at the pharmacy. As he wrote in one article:A more radical approach as explained by Transform would be to make safe doses of pure MDMA (eg 80mg/day) available to registered users in a regulated fashion, for example, via pharmacists.Nutt actually wrote a piece entitled, "Making a medicine out of MDMA," In this article, Nutt writes:"Currently there is enough evidence for MDMA to be removed from its Schedule 1 status of ‘no medical use’ and moved into Schedule 2 (alongside other misused but useful medicines such as heroin and amphetamine). Such a regulatory move would liberate its use as a medicine for patients experiencing severe mental illnesses such as treatment-resistant post-traumatic stress disorder."Here is a photo from Snarrotin's "Speakers" page, showing that Nutt spoke for Jonasson's drug pushing organization:Perhaps this is the time to unravel Robert Spencer's claim that he was spiked with MDMA. Robert Spencer went to Iceland and claims he was poisoned with MDMA, and yet he was speaking in an event organized by the biggest MDMA pusher in Iceland. What are the odds? Spencer's medical report shows that he consumed MDMA, and that he was suffering from moderate Hyponetremia (which is a Hyponetremia level between 120 and 130), which is what ravers in night clubs suffer when taking MDMA with excessive amounts of liquid:How could somebody who wants to kill Spencer, as he claims, give him just a moderate amount of MDMA?Even after Spencer's experience with drugs in Iceland (claiming his drink was spiked) he still continued to work with Jonasson, as is evidenced by the fact that Sigurfreyr became officially a member of Spencer's organization, SIOE. On his Facebook page, Jonasson posted an article entitled “How to Drink Hallucinogenic Beer Like a Viking Shaman” above which Jonasson writes: “Need to pick up some noble customs of the ancestors!”MDMA causes people to act like zombies, or what they call "gurning." If you look at photos of people high off ecstasy, you will see this zombie like behavior. Here, here is what Sigurfreyr Jonasson and his allies are promoting:Sigurfreyr organized an event in Iceland for Snarrotin. The key speaker for the event was one of the biggest drug pushers in the world, Ethan Nadelmann. Here is photo from the official website of Snarrotin, of Sigurfreyr with Nadelmann: Despite all of the hoopla on how liberals like George Soros desire to control the world, here we have Robert Spencer's partner, Jonasson, in cahoots with a Soros paid agent: Ethan Nadelmann.Nadelmann was chosen by George Soros to lead his organization, the Lindesmith Center in 1994, a pro-drug institute financed by none other than the infamous George Soros himself. According to a 1999 article published by the Nation, the oldest continuously published weekly magazine in the United States:"Soros invited Nadelmann to lunch. After further discussions, in 1994 Soros agreed to create the Lindesmith Center and put Nadelmann at the helm. The center (named for the late Professor Alfred Lindesmith of Indiana University, the first prominent US academic to challenge the war on drugs approach) became the first of what are now dozens of domestic programs run out of OSI. Today, it has eighteen employees in New York and San Francisco and a modest budget of $1.7 million."Sigurfreyr Jonasson, on his official Snarrotin website, boasted about how his organization participated in the "international premiere" report for a meeting organized by the Global Commission on Drug Policy, which is a major organization consisting of world leaders and elite intellectuals, that pushes for the legalization of all drugs. Jonasson writes about the 'big-wigs' involved in the milieu of major organizers and world leaders, pushing for universal drug usage: "It is a great honor for Snarrotin to participate in the international premiere of the new report of the Global Commission on Drug Policy (GCDP), but it will undoubtedly attract the same attention as previous reports from the committee.The New York, New York Presentation Meeting will be broadcast online, where members of the Committee will report and present the content of the report.The former speakers include Swiss, Ruth Dreifuss, former Foreign Minister of Norway,Thorvald Stoltenberg, former Brazilian president, Fernando Henrique Cardoso, former Mexican president, Ernesto Zedillo, former president of Colombia, César Gaviria, businessman Richard Branson and others."What makes this whole thing disturbing is that Robert Spencer's partner and colleague, Sigurfreyr Jonasson, is here soliciting for former Mexican president, Ernesto Zedillo, who is a member of the Global Commission on Drug Policy, and a pro-drug activist who worked with Mexican cartels while he was president of Mexico. According to a report by Statfor:Gulf cartel founder Juan Garcia Abrego, also a protege of Felix Gallardo, was arrested in 1996. Garcia Abrego allegedly was linked to Raul Salinas and other high-ranking officials in the government of then-President Ernesto Zedillo. Garcia Abrego's successor as leader of the Gulf cartel, Osiel Cardenas Guillen, was arrested in 2003 and, like Garcia Abrego, was deported to the United States and convicted in a U.S. court; he is currently incarcerated in the "Supermax" penitentiary in Florence, Colo.Ruth Dreifuss, the politician who served as President of the Swiss Confederation in 1999, and who Jonasson supports and solicits for, is a "a vigorous defender of abortion," which is interesting given the fact that Sigurfreyr Jonasson is a supporter of even what conservatives constitute as the infamous eugenist organization, Planned Parenthood. As we see from his Twitter account, Jonasson shows his advocation for the eugenist organization:THE EUGENICS AND NEO-PAGANISM CONNECTIONReading through one of Jonasson’s websites, one finds a dark connection with racial occultism, even a belief in Middle Eastern occultism, and also racialist heretical beliefs. When most hear these activist say "we support Israel" they are unaware what these mean by 'Israel' or do they even dig deep to understand what they mean by that name? Jonasson is a subscriber to the heresy called “Nordic Israelism” which states that the true Jews are those of the Scandinavian race. There is an article on his website, entitled “The prophecies about Iceland”, written by one Dr. Helgi Pjeturss, an Icelandic nationalist, occultist and Theosophist. The article takes the verse from Isaiah that says: “Therefore glorify the LORD among the fires, the name of the Lord, the God of Israel, in the islands of the west” and interprets it to mean that the Icelandic race, and not the Jews, are the chosen people of God.Referencing racial supremacist, Adam Rutherford, the post on Jonasson's website reads: “Icelanders, but not Jews, were God's chosen people.” The article references Rutherford’s book, “Iceland’s Great Inheritance,” which states that the Icelandic race is the purest race in Europe, and that it is an untainted descendent of the Tribe of Benjamin. Amongst the many heretical and bizarre things written in this book, one line reads: “While Benjamite blood is thus by no means exclusively confined to Iceland, nevertheless, it is definitely the strongest and purest there. Benjamin is therefore centered in Iceland.” The article on Jonasson's website writes:“The only big islands in the west are the British Isles and Iceland, but what Rutherford says is that it is a private island and it is the people on the island that promotes spiritual awakening in other countries.In the prophecies, the islands are described as being in the middle of the fire ("on the eastern roads" according to the Icelandic translation). In our world we do not know of fires other than fossils, and of these islands, Iceland is one that has glaring volcanoes. In addition, in Iceland, more volcanoes are relatively large in size than in any other country.The Hebrew word urim , which is translated with fires in the English Bible, also means light (fl.). The only natural light on earth that can be widely mentioned is the polar light (northern lights and southern lights) and the only island that stays close to either Arctic to see the lights clearly everywhere in Iceland is Icelanders.The prophecy spreads the island so that it is on the outermost edge of the earth or, as the ancient nations said, Ultima Thule.” This "Ultima Thule" is connected to none other than Nazi occultism. The earliest Nazis belonged to a cult called the Thule Society, founded by the occultist and Sufi Muslim, Rudolf von Sebottendorf, who believed that Iceland was the original land of the Aryans. Rudolf Hess, Alfred Rosenberg, Hans Frank, Julius Lehmann, Gottfried Feder, Dietrich Eckart, and Karl Harrer, were all major members of the Nazi Party and also members of the Thule Society. In fact, the Thule Society was amongst the earliest sponsors of the National Socialists in Germany. The fact that Sigurfreyr believes in this, and that Robert Spencer serves his organization, Vakur, indicates that Spencer is speaking for a Nazi pagan cult in Iceland.At face-value when people are served by these pretending conservatives a diet on the dangers of multiculturalism by Robert Spencer and partners, here we have Sigurfreyr Jonasson supporting Pierre Krebs, the German neo-Nazi who founded a neo-pagan cult called "Thule Seminar," with words against multiculturalism. Vakur openly supports and advocates for the work of Pierre Krebs, as we see from its official Facebook page which supposedly exposes the dangers of multiculturalism, while attacking the very Judeo-Christian ethics which Spencer claims to defend:Jonasson also supports the neo-Nazi cult leader, as he liked this post soliciting his work:This book that Vakur (which Spencer served) endorses and advertises for is filled with typical neo-Nazi and eugenist talk. In one page it says:“Unlike a colonised people who can return to their roots as soon as they free themselves from the foreign yoke, a mongrelised people are a genetically manipulated people that no longer have any roots.” (p. 23)In another part of this book, Krebs refers to "the followers of Jesus Christ" as being a part of a cultural marxist conspiracy to destroy White identity. In other words, Krebs sees Christianity as the enemy to his ethnocentrist ideology:“Egalitarianism may well postulate that races do not exist, but anyone taken at random can recognize a White from a Black, and a Black from a Yellow. To be sure, everything would be much easier if it were possible to prohibit races a vow difficult to realise because it comes down to prohibiting Nature de facto. Being unable to constrain the latter, the followers of Jesus Christ, Karl Marx and Big Brother are therefore going to try to destroy it.” (p. 28)The official banner of the Thule Seminar consists of the German black eagle, the black sun image, which was used by the Nazis, and the Nazi Wolfsangel (which is also the symbol of the Ukrainian Neo-Nazi Azov terrorist organization) with an arrow going through it, representing Northern Europe:Krebs considers himself to be an "ethno-socialist" which is no different than calling oneself a national socialist. In 2012, Pierre Krebs did a lecture in Dornach, Switzerland, entitled, The Departure of the Ethno-socialists, the transcript of which was published by the "Thule-Gesellschaft" which literally means Thule Society.In this lecture, Krebs expressed his ideology, and the things he said were no different than what you would find in Hitler's Mein Kampf, or other leading national socialist figures of the Third Reich. In one part of the lecture, Krebs said:“My friends: all men are brethren, but not brethren in the sense of artificial equanimity, but in their unique character. Only then and then can humans experience, experience, experience the spark of the divine; only then and then can they perceive their unfettered being, only so and only then can they express their natural existence, only in such a way and only then. They all agree today that a counter-defense must aim at the necessary departure from the system, based on the new birth of a Europe of Indo-European values, customs, metaphysics. A newly conceived organic economy sets a radical end to speculative capitalism and interest — in other words, the rule of Homo Oeconomicus [economic man], chasing its small financial clique from the east coast to hell, relinquishing politics as the motor of history and confessing to a national socialism.”But this connect is not solely an associate of an associate. Rather, this ideology of Krebs coincides with the very ideology of Sigurfreyr Jonasson and his organization, Vakur, which Robert Spencer discreetly spoke for, since on the official Facebook page of Vakur it reads:"Vakur - The European Culture Society wishes to promote the Indo-European cultural heritage in Iceland and to counteract policies that violate European values."The official website for Vakur explains its agenda as being for the promotion of the:"customs and ways of thinking of the Germanic peoples, who from the beginning to the end of the Viking migration put his mind on almost all the nations of the North Hemisphere."And if you wonder under what ideology Christians will soon be hurled into concentration camps, look no further than to Pierre Krebs. Krebs, the man whose work Sigurfreyr Jonasson endorses, wants to eradicate and abolish Christianity from Europe. On his Thule Seminar website, he published an article written by one Carlos Dufour, entitled Elements for the abolition of Christianity. In this article is expressed support for the Emperor Julian the Apostate for his persecution of Christians, hatred for Christianity for its rejection of eugenics (which it calls "biopolitics), and the total exhortation for the eradication of Christianity for the new pagan Europe that neo-Nazis so envision:"Emperor Julian was tolerant of the religions, but before the sight of Christianity, he felt overwhelmed by the feeling that he was facing a spiritual migration, against a revolutionary internationalism.Nietzsche maintained that we entered with Christianity a world of fiction with all imaginary causes and imaginary effects. Original sin: the imaginary cause par excellence, and the first salvation through baptism: the imaginary effect par excellence. That is why deep-seated nationalists have regarded Christianity as a rebellion against natural laws. Just as this life is not true life, your people should not be your true people. How could a real Christian take biopolitics seriously?In summary, the following has been proved: Christianity is an impertinence as a revelation, a contentless joke, and a maximum danger in the harsh world of facts. We do not know if Europe will survive, but if so, it will be without Christianity."Notice how these combat salvation by Baptism, which is the same sort of sentiments that anti-Catholic protestants harbor.In an interview, Pierre Krebs said:"In our view, ethnopluralism is outdated, because in Europe today the deadly spirit of ethno-masochism reigns. Biology, however, can never be caught within an ism, and so we simply plead for a European ethno-consciousness." The article on Iceland in prophecy, posted on Jonasson's site, quotes a line from the occultic Arabic book, the “Akbar-Ezzeman” of the 10th Century Sufi Islamic scholar, Massoudi, on the “wisdom” of an Egyptian pyramid in order to prove the divine destiny of Iceland, that is, geometrical occultism: “Shortly before the start of World War II, the teachings of the English pyramid Adams Rutherford attracted considerable attention in this country.Dr. Adam Rutherford had conducted thorough research on the Great Pyramid at Giza, Egypt.Like many pyramids of that time, Rutherford claimed that the Great Pyramid was a propaganda of stone graven.The ancient Arabic Akbar-Ezzeman script confirms this view. The script says:‘He (ie, the Great Pyramid) has the wisdom and knowledge of various arts and sciences, numerology and metrology, so that they can be stored as reports for the benefit of those who later understand them ... the stance of the stars and their traffic, Along with the history and logic of recent times and the times that come true.’Adam Rutherford considered Pyramidism to be very clear from the geometric globalization of Iceland, indicating the symbols of Iceland's purpose in preparing for the world's new world, which he believed was expected.”Jonasson's post describes Iceland as “the Virgin of the West” that will have a choice either to bring “spiritual revival” to the world or be "an idiot". It writes:“Iceland will be like a lightning in a dark world, and then, 'Icelanders will prepare to solve challenges that will bring great blessing to all mankind.’ Icelanders will tend the light that causes the spiritual revival to spread with many peoples. ‘The Virgin of the West’ is to become an idiot or a light bearer that refers to humanity into a new era of history.”Jonasson was the bass player for a band called ÞEYR, which had popularity back in the 80s and 90s. The agenda of the band was to spread the ideology of a neo-pagan revival in Northern Europe, to instill into people a rejection of Christianity and a belief in the pre-Christian Norse gods. It was a "back to roots" movement, trying to get Icelanders to return back to the religion of their pagan ancestors. The most well known member of the band, Hilmar Örn Hilmarsson, once took care of the management of the band, but this position was taken by Spencer's partner, Jonasson.A page about the band. As one can see, Jonasson was in charge of managementAfter this the band increased in popularity and even produced an album entitled: The Fourth Reich. While the band claimed that they were against Nazism, their use of the Swastikas, the fact they cry the name of Rudolf Hess in one of their songs, all indicate an elusive strategy by which to promote Nazism, in which it is propagated under the guise of being “anti-fascist.” According to one report:“Magnússon returned to Þeyr, and the band toured Scandinavia. By this point, Guðni and Hilmar decided to leave the band’s management, and were replaced by Guðmundur Sigurfreyr Jónason. With the tour, the band gained more popularity and even managed to appear on radio and television in Denmark, they also went to a studio and recorded a few songs which were released on the 12-inch EP The Fourth Reich, in memory of Wilhelm Reich whose books had been banned by the Nazi regime. The image cover was alleged Nazi incitation because it depicted Wilhelm Reich wearing a Nazi-styled armband and the British label Shout was obligated to change the cover.”In 1983, the band Þeyr released an album called Mjötviður til Fóta, According to one record, the managers behind the album were Guðni Rúnar Agnarsson, the neo-pagan Hilmar Örn Hilmarsson, and Spencer’s partner, Guðmundur Sigurfreyr Jónason.On the album one can see the letters “SS” on a black sun disk:One of the songs on the album is entitled, “Rudolf,” referring to one of the most famous SS officers in the Third Reich, Rudolf Hess.In the music video for the song, “Rudolf,” one can see the band members bearing Swastikas, dressing up as Nazis and screaming the name “Rudolf!” referring to the SS killer, Rudolf Hess. One can also see a clip of Hitler speaking in the music video:Jonasson actually believes that Hitler, because of his gift to predict the actions of his enemies, held occult powers. He writes:“Historical sources report that Hitler had correctly predicted when his troops would occupy Paris. He also said exactly the day when Roosevelt, the US president, would die. Moreover, it is clear that his intuition or foresight was very useful when evaluating responses needed by foreign countries in various actions against the German Nazi regime. A good example is when Hitler decided to restore the Rhine countries. Both domestic and foreign experts in international politics felt that such a step would call for harsh reaction from France and Britain. Hitler predicted, however, that they would not act and it worked.”Clip from Sigurfreyr Jonasson's post on Hitler and the Occult.Jonasson concludes that Hitler, because of his supposed ability to predict things, “made contact with forces from the deeper soul of the soul.”In another article on Jonasson's site, entitled "Nazi Mysticism," Robert Spencer's friend describes Hitler's life as "miraculous," writing:His [Hitler's] story is miraculous. When he entered the German Labor Party it 'was nothing but a pitiful obscenities club with less than ten members. In a few months Adolf managed with enormous depth and energetic activities and great determination to change this insignificant club in the mass movement that gathered rapidly down to the height of power.He writes in one article that Aleister Crowley, the infamous occultist, pervert and drug addict, was amongst the “entrepreneurs in the history of science and the arts who used drugs of various types to expand and explore the inner world of his own mind. Some scholars believe that the human need to explore the variability of their knowledge - whether with the help of drugs or other means - is not only normal, inherent in disposition, similar to hunger or sexual desire, but also essential for the health and development of mankind.”He then praises this deviant occultist, saying: “Crowley was a pioneer of scientific exploration of consciousness and in the efforts he used in the sex practices of Tantra Yoga”. In the 1980s, the member of the band, Hilmar Örn Hilmarsson, founded a center for the promotion of the work of Wilhelm Reich, an Austrian psychoanalyst who promoted “adolescent sexuality and the availability of contraceptives, abortion and divorce”. Hilmar co-founded the organization with “Guðmundur S. Jónason” or Guðmundur Sigurfreyr Jónason, Robert Spencer's partner. According to one report:“It was a center created in 1982 by him, Guðlaugur K. Óttarsson and Guðmundur S. Jónason to promote the work of [Wilhelm] Reich by means of orgone therapists and lectures.” Jonasson’s partner, Hilmar, would eventually become a “high priest” in the “Asatru Association,” or an association founded to bring the Northern European people away from Christianity and back to the pre-Christian pagan religion of Scandinavia. “Hilmar Örn was ordained as allsherjargoði or chief goði of the Ásatrúarfélagið during a formal ceremony held on 4 July 2003. He is a recognized authority on indigenous Norse paganism” reads one report on him.The reason why these people are promoting paganism is not because they want to ‘return people to their roots.’ That is all an illusion and a scheme. The real reason is because they are of the spirit of antichrist and want to replace Christianity with their diabolical religion. A recent report on the Asatru cult says that White supremacists worship Odin because they despise the “mongrelized” teachings of Jesus. Daniel Burnside, a racist Odinist in Pennsylvania, recently said:“Turning the other cheek and it’s all going to be OK, that isn’t the answer a lot of people who are turning to Odinism are looking for … They’re looking for the idea of, do you want to be the nail, or do you want to be the hammer?”Anders Breivik, the Norwegian mass murderer who slaughtered over seventy people, held the same anti-Christian beliefs. In an interview after his conviction, he said:“There are few things in the world more pathetic than the Jesus figure and his message, and I have always despised the weakness and the internationalism that the church represents”Sigurfreyr himself recently expressed support for the wearing of Thor's Hammer, saying:"Thor's hammer is in my opinion part of Icelandic cultural heritage and nothing to be ashamed of."Anytime someone wears the medallion of Thor’s Hammer, it is a signal that they are pagan neo-Nazis. Glenn Cross, a White supremacist who murdered three people at Jewish centers in Kansas, wore a Thor’s Hammer pendant. Ryan Giroux, a pagan nazi who murdered one person and injured five others in Arizona, had the Thor’s Hammer image tattooed on his chin. Martin Sellner, the leader of the eugenist, neo-Nazi Identitarian movement in Austria (who Shoebat.com directly debated) did an interview for the racist front group, “Center for Continental Cooperation,” in which he promoted a social construct in which Catholics embrace paganism. He calls these types of “Catholics,” “Solar Catholics”. Like the White supremacists in the US, Sellner promotes the wearing of Thor’s Hammer, even for Catholics:“We say that we fight against the enemies of all European cultural and religious traditions. This is why radical neopagans wearing Thor’s hammer, for example, stand hand in hand with staunch Catholic and Orthodox Christians during our summer camp in France. They have a mutual respect for each other’s religiosity. Even representatives from such novel movements such as the “solar Christians” (fr. chretiens solairs) appeared among the French identitarians. They are baptized Christians, faithful children of the Church, yet they are not opposed to celebrating pagan seasonal holidays as part of their North-European cultural heritage.” Jonasson's colleague Hilmar Hilmarsson is the leading figure of reviving this paganism in Iceland:Hilmar is now behind the construction of the first pagan temple in Iceland since the Viking age:EUGENICS AND NAZISMIn the ideology of Robert Spencer's partner, Sigurfreyr Jonasson, occultism and eugenics are combined, which is the same mix of evil beliefs that was held by the Nazis. On Sigurfreyr's Pinterest page, there is a whole section of images that advertise modern day eugenist figures, such as Jared Taylor of the American eugenist organization, Amren; Danish eugenist, Helmuth Nyborg; Canadian eugenist, Stefan Molyneux; American eugenist, Charles Murray; American Alt-Right leader, Richard Spencer; Swedish neo-pagan and eugenist, Daniel Friberg, the founder of Arktos Media, which collaborates with the Ukrainian neo-Nazi terrorist organization, Azov; and American eugenist and former Heritage Foundation employee, Jason Richwine.Here you can see that Jonasson has a section of his Pinterest page for Alt-Right material: Looking at Sigurfreyr's Youtube channel, it is obvious that he admires the eugenist and White nationalist, Richard Spencer:Sigurfreyr Jonasson, one of the organizers behind the event for Robert Spencer in Iceland, quoted Daniel Friberg on October of last year on his Facebook page.Here is the quote:“Our historical subject is Europe, and we first and foremost stand for and defend the interests of her and her peoples. This does not in any way preclude good will towards, or cooperation with, other peoples and political groups. However, every person in Sweden and Europe deserves political authorities who will stand for the Swedish and European peoples, when their safety or welfare is under threat, and who will seek to preserve and improve their welfare."When you click on the link you are taken to a page of Sigurfreyr Jonasson's website that praises Friberg and promotes his work in advocating racialist and pagan writers like Pierre Krebs, Guillaume Faye, Alain de Benoist, Paul Gottfried, Tomislav Sunic, Oswald Spengler and others.The page reads:“Daniel Friberg holds an MBA degree from Gothenburg Business School and CEO of the Swedish mining company Wiking Mineral. Friberg is the founding member of the Swedish think tank Motpol and Arktos, which is known for publishing books by ideologists of new culture and novelty.”There are a number of things to observe here. One, the page promotes Paul Gottfried, one of the godfathers of the Alt-Right and the mentor of Richard Spencer; both of these men were amongst the first advocates for Alt-Right ideology and shared platforms in one of the earliest centers for the Alt-Right, the Bodrum conference in Turkey, which is associated with, financed and supported by Turkish elites, on which we have written extensively.Secondly, the page on Jonasson's site promotes a video of a Swedish lecture given by Friberg, entitled "Victory or Valhalla." Valhalla is the afterlife in the pre-Christian Scandinavian religion, the place where the warriors who died in battle were believed to have gone, to enjoy for eternity sex, alcohol and endless battle, making Valhalla very similar to the Islamic paradise. Friberg is literally calling for pagan jihad and saying that his pagan warriors will receive either victory or enteral pleasures in Valhalla. Thirdly, Friberg is the founder of Arktos Media, and he co-founded it with John Morgan. Morgan is an American who has worked closely with the Nazi party of Ukraine, Svoboda.Svoboda reveres the Ukrainian Nazi, Stepan Bandera, who with his chief lieutenants once wrote that “Muscovites, Poles, and Jews” would be “destroyed . . . in particular those who protect the [Soviet] regime.” Bandera and his minions also wrote: “it is permissible to liquidate undesirable Poles”.Poles and Russians are traditionally Catholic and Orthodox Christians, the elements that make up the two lamp stands. And from this you can see how such pagans will target Christendom.John Morgan also works with Amren, the American eugenist organization that also collaborates with the Flemish White Power activist and EU parliamentarian, Filip DeWinter, the one who organized the Counterjihad Summit in 2007 in the EU parliament in Brussels.It was this meeting in Brussels, which was financed by Christine Brim, who was working as an agent for Frank Gaffney's Center for Security Policy, that would commence the Counterjihad as an official movement. Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller, Norwegian eugenist Peder Are Nøstvold Jensen, and numerous other Counterjihad activists were invited to the meeting. This all reveals an ideological and political international network between European Nazis, American eugenists, American think-tank agents (like Frank Gaffney) who are very close with US government officials, the Counterjihad, the Alt-Right, racialists in Turkey (the Bodrum conference), and the European Union (since Filip Dewinter is indeed in the EU parliament). The Counterjihad is simply just one part of an international movement to push the world into chaos, eugenics and Nazi and racialist ideology.Sigurfreyr Jonasson promoted the book, Generation Identity, by Markus Willinger, which was published by Daniel Friberg's Arktos Media:Jonasson, in Icelandic, says: “Declaration of War against the Political Party, and in particular, the impact of the 68 generation on society.” The “68 generation” is a term used by the Far-Right in Germany to describe the left wing generation in West German who, during the 60s, protested for the removal of politicians with Nazi pasts, amongst other things. When these talk about "fighting the Left," they are speaking of combating only those leftists who oppose Nazism. The author that he is here promoting, Markus Willinger, is very anti-Christian and pushes for an ethnocentric paganism. In this book solicited by Jonasson, it pushes for a Darwinist religion, saying: "Sometimes we believe in something, sometimes in nothing. A bit in God, a bit in biology, a bit in everything, and a bit in nothing." The book is also anti-Catholic, with Willinger writing: "When we think of the Church, nothing but intolerance and backwardness come to mind." In one part of another one of his books, A Europe of Nations, it reads:“The truth is that Christianity is dead in Europe. For a long time it hasn’t been the crucial factor in the lives of the European peoples; it is no longer their driving force; and they no longer derive the meaning of their lives from it. …If we Europeans are still Christians, we are pagan Christians, without any global ambitions and without a claim to rule the world. It is a polytheistic Christianity that we believe in today. We believe in our God, and say that others believe in their gods too. We’ve lost the will to proselytise. Today we are closer to pagan Europe than to the Europe from of a thousand years ago.” (p. 76)And in another part of the book it reads:“If Europe is to renew itself, it must honour its pagan heritage. If Europe is to be reborn, it needs a new renaissance of all European values, including those of ancient Greece and Rome. It must fill its old festivals with life once again, break its chains to American culture, and rediscover itself. The missionary Europe of previous centuries is now at an end.” (p. 77)In Sigurfreyr’s website there is a section entitled, “Scientific research and [the] evil that accompanies diversity” in which are posted several writings on how certain genetic makeups lead to violence and conflict.Jonnason is presenting eugenist literature to prove his racialist ideology and worldview.Jonasson links to the articles but does not put their titles; rather, he presents them with a quote from the publication that he likes. We took screenshots of the list of linked quotes from eugenist articles presented by Jonasson:He presents a link to one of these eugenist writings with a quote that reads as such: “Genetic diversity has Contributed significantly to frequencies of ethnic civil conflict, intensity of social unrest, growth of unshared policy preferences, and economic inequality over the last half-century”, essentially attributing human conflict with people’s genetic makeups.The actual article itself is entitled: “The Nature of Conflict” and it is written by Cemal Eren Arbatli, a Turkish economist who graduated from the University of Istanbul who now serves as a professor in Moscow; Quamrul H. Ashraf, associate professor of economics in William College; and Oded Galor, an Israeli economist. What is interesting is that a Turk, an Indian and an Israeli are conspiring to advance the cause of eugenics, which only indicates that evil has no race, and that the ideology of Social-Darwinism is not limited only to Western European elites. Lets not forget that the Young Turks, the Ottoman elites who conducted the systematic extermination of Christians in the 20th century, believed in Darwinism and eugenics. Here you have three different persons, each of a distinct ethnic group, writing to cause racial conflict. This demonstrates that different races can unite to promote racism; this proves that the goal is not racism unto itself, but rather an ideological unity with the objective to cause chaos, and this chaos will only lead to the persecution of Christians.Cemal Eren, Turkish eugenistQuamrul H. AshrafOded GalorIn the paper written by these three eugenists, and linked to by Robert Spencer’s comrade, Jonasson, it emphatically declares that genetic diversity in a society leads to conflict: “This research establishes that the emergence, prevalence, recurrence, and severity of intrastate conflicts in the modern era reflect the long shadow of prehistory. Exploiting variations across national populations, it demonstrates that genetic diversity, as determined predominantly during the exodus of humans from Africa tens of thousands of years ago, has contributed significantly to the frequency, incidence, and onset of both overall and ethnic civil conflict over the last half-century, accounting for a large set of geographical and institutional correlates of conflict, as well as measures of economic development. Furthermore, the analysis establishes the significant contribution of genetic diversity to the intensity of social unrest and to the incidence of intragroup factional conflict.”In another part of the paper, it reads:“Our findings thus far establish that the genetic diversity of a contemporary national population is a robust and significant reduced-form contributor to the risk of civil conflict in society, as manifested by the frequency, prevalence, and emergence of both overall and ethnic civil conflict events over the past half-century.”In another paper written by the Israeli professor, Oden Galor, it advocates for “sex-selection” abortion in Taiwan. Galor categorizes women into three groups: Type 1, Type 2 and Type 3. Type 1 women are those who will always desire to have children; Type 2 will only want to get pregnant “if they have a reasonable probability of having a boy”; and Type 3 women never want to get pregnant. In the twisted reasoning of Oded, the legalization and cheap cost of abortion will increase the births from women who desire only a boy and who know that the option of abortion will always be available if they so choose to murder their own unborn children if its not the desired gender. Galor writes: “by increasing the expected value of giving birth (e.g. the probability of having a son), it has increased the number of births from mothers who bore a high cost of child bearing and who otherwise would not have had children.” Galor concludes at the end of his paper that"the introduction of abortion will have heterogeneous effects on fertility in contexts where there is son-preference and pre-natal sex detection technology is readily available. On the one hand, it will reduce the number of children born from unwanted pregnancies. On the other hand, a decrease in the costs of sex-selection from sex-selective abortion could induce women who bear a high cost of child rearing to have children."Another eugenist writing that Jonasson quotes and links to on his website is one written by the Finnish eugenist, Tatu Vanhanen, entitled: “Ethnic Nepotism as a Cross-Cultural Background Factor of Ethnic Conflicts.” Jonasson quotes a line from the paper, that states:“[E]thnic heterogeneity [diversity] Explains 55% of the variation in the scale of ethnic Conflicts, and the results of regression analysis disclose that the same relationship applies more or less to all 187 countries. ... [E]thnic nepotism is the common cross-cultural background factor-which supports the persistence of ethnic Conflicts in the world as long as there are ethnically divided form societies”.Tatu VanhanenIn another part of the paper, Vanhanen states that conflict and ethnicity — as opposed to conflict and ideology or morality — are interconnected. He writes:“I prefer primordialist conceptualization of ethnicity and seek ultimate explanations for ethnic conflicts from biological factors.”Vanhanen believes that intelligence, or IQ, is inherited and that this inherited intelligence determines the state of ethnic groups:“We found that national IQ explains more of the variation in human conditions than any other explanatory variable. It is highly interesting to see whether this applies also to ethnic conflicts. In this study it is assumed that national IQ is an explanatory variable which is able to explain a significant part of the variation in ethnic conflicts, too.”Vanhanen, in the same writing, actually talks about how he worked and still works with the virulent eugenist, Richard Lynn, in producing literature on how IQ is inherited and how it determines the peace or the conflict of a nation. In the paper, Vanhanen says:“Richard Lynn has had a leading role in the study of intelligence differences between nations see (Nyborg, 2013: p. X). I began to co-operate with Lynn in 1999 and to produce comparative studies on the impact of intelligence differences to human conditions. We found that national IQ explains more of the variation in human conditions than any other explanatory variable. It is highly interesting to see whether this applies also to ethnic conflicts. In this study it is assumed that national IQ is an explanatory variable which is able to explain a significant part of the variation in ethnic conflicts, too.” Notice that Vanhanen makes a reference to Nyborg, whose full name is Helmuth Nyborg. Its important to point this out because Nyborth is a Danish eugenist, who is admired by Sigurfreyr Jonasson.Helmuth Nyborg, the Danish member of this eugenist network, advocates for “negative eugenics” or the belief that murder, infanticide and abortion are a means of “weeding out” those seen as undesirable for human evolution. In one writing, Nyborg writes:“‘Negative’ eugenics aims to curtail deleterious traits in a population through various programmes of weeding people out. Possible methods include infanticide, homicide, abortion, sterilisation, legislation, social policy and even social pressure.” So now you know how Wisdom 2 will be fulfilled. Nyborg actually believes in imposing government policy to stop certain people, who he deems as inferior, from having children. In 2011, Nyborg wrote a paper entitled, “The decay of Western civilization: Double relaxed Darwinian Selection.” In this writing Helmuth, referencing his colleague Richard Lynn, states that all of humanity originally came from Africa, and that the people who migrated to northern Europe developed a superior intelligence and genetic makeup through Darwinian evolution. Nyborg writes:“Science and civilization owe much to Richard Lynn for his decade-long attempts to identify major factors behind the rise and fall of modern populations. In Race differences in intelligence: An evolutionary analysis (2006) Lynn mapped geographic variations in intelligence, and explained related race differences by Cold Winters theory, according to which people from Africa migrated up North, and met still more harsh climatic challenges, so they had to develop new ways of preserving food, heat-efficient cloth and sheltering, complex traps, and later agricultural, industrial and urban ways of life. As they migrated further North, they became increasingly exposed to unforgiving Darwinian Selection for superior intelligence, health, and character.”In another part of this diabolical work, Nyborg laments how old eugenist policies for preventing the “unfit” from marrying are no longer being enacted, and he also expresses his favor of the elimination of the elderly, on how abortion and infanticide have been used as a means of “natural selection” and the elimination of children he deems as “unfit”: “Natural selection previously worked through the elimination of the old and via social-class differentials in the number of children surviving to adulthood. The greater reproductive fitness of the upper and middle classes indicates the presence of positive natural selection for intelligence, as does negative selection in the lower classes with higher mortality, more infanticides and abortions, undernourishment associated lower fertility, bad health and higher mortality rate among illegitimate children, and strong social controls preventing marriage for the unfit, thereby typically reducing their procreation.”How else do you think Wisdom 2 will be fulfilled? when it says:Let us oppress the righteous poor;let us neither spare the widownor revere the aged for hair grown white with time. (Wisdom 2:10)While Nyborg will say that the drive to protect the weak is “noble,” he declares — just as the National Socialists of old once did, that this sympathy will only lead to the destruction of “civilization,” as he writes:“The noble, ethically motivated, preservation of the weak inevitably leads to self-destruction through a progressive reduction in the quality of the genetic material for superior intelligence, health, fertility and personality – traits essential for the rise and sustainability of advanced civilizations.”Nyborg describes the Danish as a “tribe” whose existence is being threatened by what he calls “IRDS” or “Internal Relaxation (or Reversal) of Darwinian Selection,” or the preservation of those he deems as “unfit,” as he writes in his diatribe, which is merely an expression of a desire to return to the eugenics that were once violently imposed in the West during the 20th century. As Nyborg writes:“The Danish tribe is threatened by IRDS, and the excellent social and health care systems worsen this by preserving still more weak, poor and old.”Nyborg states that because of post WW2 indignation towards eugenics, Europe is currently going through its migration crises, which he describes as “low IQ” immigrants replacing Europeans:“Why were early dysgenic warnings neglected and the messengers demonized? Because too many leading scientists, politicians and intellectuals (Nyborg, 2003; in press) ignored Darwinian principles and started a historically hitherto unheard of voluntary, humanistic, democratic and financed replacement policy, whereby dwindling genetically weakened (Lynn, Harvey, & Nyborg, 2009) sub-fertile Western European populations will rapidly be replacedby more fertile low-IQ non-European immigrants.”If the argument is solely to combat the "migration crises" then why are these people all of a sudden attacking not the Protestant churches, but the Catholic Church, which is really the center for Western civilization and the beacon of morality that civilized Europe from pagan savagery? Richard Lynn, a colleague of both Nyborg and Vanhanen, and someone who Sigurfreyr Jonasson admires, has even gone so far as to describe the Catholic Church as an enemy of the system of natural selection, since it prohibits abortion and birth control which, to these modern-day nazis, is good to kill off the “inferior” people. In one book of Lynn he writes:Whatever the explanation for the institutionalization of monogamy in Christendom, this was the first of the four great blows struck by the Roman Catholic Church against natural selection. The second was the requirement of clerical celibacy which Pope Innocent I imposed about the year 410 and which curtailed the fertility of the many able men and women who entered the church, although it was not always successful in eliminating it entirely. The third was the prohibition of birth control in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, which made it difficult for the less competent to control their fertility, while the competent found ways of doing so. The fourth was the prohibition of abortion, the availability of which reduces the fertility of the less competent who are more prone to unplanned and unwanted pregnancies.” Richard Lynn, speaking for AmrenLynn favors abortion as a way to ‘cut down’ the number of babies born with diseases:“To some degree this increase is being mitigated by the prenatal diagnosis and abortion of fetuses with these disorders—a form of eugenic intervention which has generally escaped the censure of the critics of eugenics, most of whom have been able to see that it is better to be born healthy than diseased.”We have done extensive research on Spencer's nefarious associates, from Nazis to criminals. We wondered what his priest, Fr. Thomas P. Steinmetz, thought of his work, and so we called him to inquire as to why Spencer no longer serves as a deacon in his parish, Our Lady of the Cedars. As you can see from the video, Steinmetz is both very hesitant and terrified to reveal what happened:Robert Spencer was doing an event for Sigurfreyr Jonasson, a neo-pagan Nazi who runs the biggest drug pushing organization in Iceland, Snarrotin. Spencer can claim in ignorance, but he would still have to explain why has travelled to Sweden to speak for the Sweden Democrats, a political party founded by Nazis which actually held a meeting with a Nazi SS member; Spencer still has to explain why his organization, SIOE (Stop the Islamization of Europe) has on its board people who are anti-Christian, or who have worked with criminals and thugs. All of these facts lead us to conclude the nefariousness of Robert Spencer.Now it is important to recognize that some people and their connections may come as a surprise, and this is only natural and should be expected, as nobody can be expected to know everything about everybody. However, certain things are obvious about people because they have chosen to associate themselves with said persons or activities. For example, at Shoebat.com we associate ourselves with criticism of Islam and homosexuality as well as Catholic militancy. It is only expected then that anybody who claims to be a regular reader or fan of Shoebat.com would likely subscribe to or at least be sympathetic to our views unless there was a clear reason to say otherwise. Truly as the saying says, “birds of a feather flock together”. Guðmundur “Sigurfreyr” Jonasson is a person who has spent from what we have seen the last 22 years- really since the earliest days of the Internet in terms of public use- aggressively promoting his views online. If that was not enough, one can read newspaper articles written by him and even his book in which he expresses his views. There is plenty of material about him by which one can get a panoramic view of his life’s work, ideas, and how they have progressed over time.What is clear is that Sigurfreyr is a notorious occultist, pusher of extreme drug use, and promoter of eugenicist ideas with connections to National Socialists and anti-Christian pagans whose work spans over two decades across Iceland and throughout Northern Europe and even as far as parts of east Asia and the Americas. He is not simply a participant, but is regarded as a resource for these ideas and this does not appear to have changed. Now one can only go by what information one has available, and since we do not know exactly what happened in Iceland, our resources are limited. I would understand if Mr. Spencer did not know a lot about Sigurfreyr and he was a lesser-known figure in Iceland who happened to have some strange interests- this would not per se be as much of an issue. But the fact that Sigufreyr has defined himself for the last two decades by his commitment to promoting drug use across Europe and is recognized as a major purveyor of ideas regarding the occult, ethnonationalist paganism, and eugenics throughout northern Europe, one naturally has to question Mr. Spencer’s meeting with him, especially due to the fact that Sigurfreyr’s name as well as the other participants were not mentioned at all except solely for a passing note in Icelandic media. The claims of being “poisoned” by well-known party drugs as methamphetamine (MDMA) and ecstasy only raises more concerns given Sigurfreyr’s reputation as a major promoter for the legalization of methamphetamine and ecstasy. Two questions naturally emerge from this.First, how could Mr. Spencer have NOT known about Sigurfreyr’s reputation, since his past speaks for itself? It is possible that he did not look into his background, but if so, why would he have flown several thousand miles to speak with a group of people and with a person he knows absolutely nothing about? Even a simple search on Sigurfreyr online yields his entire history. Even if simply for the sake of his own personal security, why would he have not checked even superficially into his background? If he did do this, why would he as a public figure with a reputation to maintain and a brand (his website) to protect choose to associate with a group and a person who has the blatant public associations that he has?Likewise, assuming that he would choose to speak with this group, would he not even mention Sigurfreyr because, even if he has infamous connections, one would at least be aware that he was speaking with a man for the sake of his cause and not because he supports his other ideas? Why keep this so hidden from public view? If the seriousness of what we have just described above is still not fully understood, just imagine if one of us at Shoebat.com was going to a meeting for a group and we said nothing about this group before and after the event. No video or audio was taken of the event in any way- not even a cheap cell phone camera video.It was only later that somebody else found out through obscure but verifiable sources that at that meeting a David Duke was speaking. Then, several days later and without any public notification, David Duke is silently added to the board of directors for Shoebat.com. Would it not raise questions as to why we were at a meeting with David Duke and no video was available? Or how about the fact that he was added to the board of directors without any public notice? If David Duke was at that event, would we not at least say that he was there for the simple fact of transparency given his public views as well as ours? Why would everything be kept so silent? Again, one can only go by what information is available in his particular situation. However, the more questions that one asks about this evetn the more questions arise with even fewer reasonable answers to them.What we can conclude is that Robert Spencer was doing an event for Sigurfreyr Jonasson, a neo-pagan Nazi who runs the biggest drug pushing organization in Iceland, Snarrotin. Spencer can claim in ignorance, but he would still have to explain why he has travelled to Sweden to speak for the Sweden Democrats, a political party founded by Nazis which actually held a meeting with a Nazi SS member; Spencer still has to explain why his organization, SIOE (Stop the Islamization of Europe) has on its board people who are anti-Christian, occult-practicing criminals and why such extensive measures were seemingly taken to avoid any mention of this. print anonymous armageddon isis islam war Horrific Massacre Revealed On Film: Muslim Terrorists Kidnap Innocent Man And Brutally Butcher Him Alive A horrific massacre was revealed on film: Muslim terrorists in the Philippines butchered an innocent man alive. You can see this ritual... Read More...» Major Western Theologians Teach That The Catholic Church Killed One Hundred Million Christians And That The United States Killed Two Hundred Million Native Americans 0 By Walid Shoebat (Shoebat Sunday Special)Many sola-scripturists insist that the Catholic Church killed one hundred million sola-scripturists and is why they do not trust the Catholic Church. These insist we must search the scriptures and only obey the scriptures.But if I am to only obey and search the scriptures, then my first step is to search the scriptures for the word 'obey'.So what do we find in the scriptures regarding obedience? Besides all the verses that says to obey God, God finally funnels such obedience towards "prelates" "magistrates" "bishops" and church authority. It is just as the Old Testament in ancient Israel funneled all theology to the realm of the Levites."Obey your prelates, and be subject to them" God says in the book of Hebrews (13:17). The reference here is to the religious and not civil authority (see Barnes Notes on Hebrews 13:17).But even civil authorities, Paul in Romans 13:2 includes magistrates and he affirms this in a clear way:"whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves." (Romans 13:2)Therefore, everyone who says that you 'must obey scripture' is biblically sound, while everyone who has ever said that 'you must obey scriptures 'alone', by itself, and by applying their own foreign and personal interpretations, is not sound.So all these Bible-aloneists go against God's ordinances and even scripture itself. It is God Who appoints the authority. So as long as authority does not infringe on your obedience to God, then obedience to such authority is obedience to God, while disobedience to such appointed authority is disobedience to God.These short lines I wrote above should end all arguments. But they don't. Why?The renegade insists on using scripture to determine who is this qualified authority and he is always crying out how corrupt the authority is.But no matter how corrupt the authority is, we have ample and credible Church fathers whom Christians throughout the ages agree were competent and godly saints who correctly interpreted scripture.But ask the renegade to obey these and you will instantly get the same circular reasoning: you must obey scripture alone because the authorities are corrupt, especially that the Catholic Church murdered a hundred million sola-scripturist saints.But the argument still remains: our fathers correctly interpreted the scriptures. Even Christ, He never argued with the authorities knowledge and correct interpretation of scripture, He condemned them for their disobedience of it.But this is the endless circular reasoning you will always encounter with millions of these 'blind leading the bind'. And by this faulty reasoning, the renegade has a goal. It is not 'scripture alone' he wants you to follow but 'him alone'.He demands you obey him. He does this while he says that you 'must obey the scripture'. Reality is, he wants to isolate you to strictly obey his private interpretations of scripture.Why such wolf are evil is simple to explain: the wolf by telling you to obey his interpretations, instead of the fathers interpretations, he masquerades as if he is God. These do not hate authority, they in fact love authority: them.They are rabid blasphemers who claim they have a direct open-line to Jesus as if Jesus did not establish His church.But who is then this 'authority' that scripture speaks of?The bible-aloneist will always argue-100% of the time-of himself as the authority, his pastor, or a book he purchased, or a Youtube video, or a weblink to be such authority. He insists that you immediately need to review and follow his direction. He will instantly state that "Pope Frances is an environmentalist," and "the other pope before him was found kissing a Quran" and that "the Vatican is infested with gays and pedophiles".And so when you address the "gay problem" by using the very scriptures, which he claims to 'obey' and you tell him: these according to the Book of Romans are "worthy of death". Civil authority historically used to punish the homosexual and all this 'love' without punishment simply crept in the last few decades.Say that and these very 'scripture-aloneists' will be the first to turn on you. They say that "according to the New Testament we must love the homosexual" and not punish him.Why then not also love the murderer instead of applying civil punishment? Therefore, by using such an argument we must then all become liberal activists carrying banners that say "united against the death penalty".But you would never see sola-scripturists with a Bible in hand carrying such placards.So even if you bring up the Bible, or even the Church fathers, these would still object arguing that the 'fathers' ordained the "killing of millions of sola-scripturist saints".The Catholic Church, they say, is "drunk with the blood of the saints and the martyrs of Jesus Christ" (Revelation 17:6).Such language is another clue that what you are dealing with here is a wolf in sheep clothing and not a saint. A rabid blaspheming wolf will rarely speak about the blood of millions of Catholics and Eastern orthodox who fought Islam. These will always elevate any heretical blood except the blood of apostolic-successon saints.John MacArthur, for example, rejects the biblical discourses of the fathers and prefers the heretical groups as orthodox Bible expositors writing "While the period [12th-13th century] produced some famous preachers, such as Peter the Hermit, Bernard of Clairvaux, and Thomas Aquinas, none handled the text in an expository fashion. Faint hints of Bible exposition have been detected among independent groups such as the Paulicians, Waldenses, and Albigenses, despite the fact that these groups are commonly dismissed as “heretics.” (MacArthur, Preaching: How to Preach Biblically, ch. 3)To further his defense of these 'heretics' MacArthur says that: "according to Protestant Historian John Dowling, the Roman Catholic Church has put to death more than fifty million of these “heretics” between A.D. 606 (the birth of the papacy) and the mid-1800s" (The MacArthur New Testament Commentary, John 12-21, P.p. 188)HOW TO SPOT A HERETICASK HIM ABOUT HOLY BLOOD AND EXAMINE HIS DUALIST DOUBLE MINDIt is always the case on how you spot the true heretic. To the heretic, only the blood of Catholics and Orthodox is rendered worthless, while the theology of the Manichean Albigenses including their blood is considered sacred-worthy.And this is the case no matter who you deal with from that realm.But you would never find these explain to their congregants who truly are these Paulicians, Albigenses, Bogomils, Manicheans and Cathars.All These were Dualists. Their belief stemmed from the East, from a Zoroastrian named Mani (3rd century). After a pilgrimage to India, Mani came back to preach in Iran. Mani was visited by an angel: the Messenger of the light of Paradise, who asked him to proclaim his doctrine far and wide.Manichaen/Cathar belief is itself a melange of Persian Zoroastrianism and early Christian Gnostic Dualism. The grandfather of dualist doctrines in Europe is Manichaeanism, which flourished in the early Christian era. It died out but dualism didn't. In the twelfth century a new strand erupted from the old: Catharism. This heresy invaded the West from the Balkans and festered in parts of France and Italy.SCRIPTURE SAYS: Beware of a double minded man (James 1:8)These dualists believed in two universal principles, a New Testament good God and an Old Testament violent bad God. This attitude, although sola-scripturists say they reject, yet once you dialogue with them, you will find out a similar duality and a similar 'double-mindedness' in much of what they say. Today these by large isolate the New Testament when it comes to the wars with pagans and heretics. They act as if Christ needed to repeat the Old Testament in the New. They isolate the two as if the Old is rendered worthless. This is why many require verses exclusively from the New Testament to prove a point to today's sola-scripturists.Dualism is why today's sola-scripturist sees that an age of grace would mean that God prohibits wars. It is as if God changed His mind and so they condemn what the church did to the Cathars which was exactly what Joshua, Moses and Judas Maccabees did to combat rampant heresy, syncretism and paganism that went out of hand and gone violent where it only ended by war campaigns.The God of the Old Testament changing His mind about punishing heresy goes against the theology that God does not change. God is the same today, yesterday and forever. This is why when one examines the theology of the fathers, they had no problem with Christian militarism or military expeditions to wipe out violent heretics. These saw the church continuing God's ways, that heresy, gone rampant and unchecked and allowed to fester by violence would destroy the whole batch. So unless it is met with complete annihilation, just as Moses, Joshua, David and Judas Maccabees did before them, it will end up destroying the whole structure of society.Even historian Charles Lea had to admit: “Had Catharism become predominant, its influence would infallibly have proved fatal” (History of the Inquisition, I, 117).But here is my Jesus-style question to all these sola-scripturists who love the Cathars: if the Cathars were so great, why do the liberals, evolutionists, Nazis, ecologists, environmentalists, satanists, agnostics, vegans (all anti-meat eating animal-rights activists) including the 'scripture aloneist' crowds are united in their veneration of the Cathars, while they condemn Catholic veneration of St. Mary?Something is utterly wrong with this picture.Nazis are usually vegan prohibiting meat. In fact Paul prophetically warned of the Cathars and the Manicheans prohibition on marriage and meat:Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron; Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.Yet the scripture-aloneists use this very verse to accuse "priests for remaining celibate" and "Catholic fasting" as fulfillment.Have these forgot: the sacrament of marriage is a Catholic sacrament, not Protestant. Have these forgot, it was the Catholic Church that annihilated the vegans?And what was Bogomil belief whom these defend: rejection of the Trinity, rejection of the Old Testament, rejection of the church hierarchy, rejection of sacraments, and the rejection of meat.The rejection of church hierarchy is the language of all liberals, communists, agnostics, homosexuals, satanists, cultists including the pro-birth control sola-scripturists...The Cathars and Albigenses, just like the sola-scripturists, they had no doctrinal objection to contraception but also believed in euthanasia and assisted suicide through starvation. They believed that all non-procreative sex was better than any procreative sex and that sexual intercourse between man and wife was more culpable than homosexual sex. And since the God of the Old Testament was the devil he committed homicide when he burned up Sodom and Gomorrah. It was easy-go on the sodomites just as we see happening today.To them Christ Who was born in the visible and terrestrial Bethlehem, crucified in Jerusalem, was evil and that Mary Magdalene was his concubine; and that she was the woman taken in adultery while the good Christ, never ate or drank or took upon him true flesh since he was only in this world spiritually in the body of Paul.But they have much in common with sola-scripturists saying that almost all the Church of Rome was a den of thieves; and that it was the harlot of which we read in the Apocalypse. This is where extreme Protestants got the idea from.So the scripture aloneists would argue "why throw out the baby with the bathwater". They in fact agree with the Cathars on many issues. They, so far annulled the sacraments of the Church. They publicly taught that the water of holy Baptism was just the same as river water. That the Host of the Most Holy Body of Christ did not differ from common bread. Confirmation and Confession, they considered as altogether vain and frivolous. They preached that Holy Matrimony was meretricious, and that none could be saved in it, if they should beget children since salvation did not need to show the fruit of good works.Like the Manicheans, the Cathars ate no meat, despised the ecclesiastical hierarchy, rejected the doctrine of the Trinity, and practiced chastity and poverty.So you might think "chastity," why not? Didn't Paul talk about saints dedicating their lives to Christ instead of a spouse?This is the utter hypocrisy one finds today where the youth (especially women) resent marriage while at the same time these condemn priests for celibacy.And after all, Cathars valued the Scriptures and based their theology on their own interpretations instead of the Vatican's. They were, in fact, opposed to procreative sex because it brought other souls into what they viewed as a world of sin.France and Italy between the 11th and 13th centuries had been infected with this dualist Catharism while spreading much violence and the church after decades of attempting to debate with it had to finally deal with it responding to Cathar violence just as the U.S. responded to Mormon violence. While the Cathars (like the Muslim apologists) rejected oath taking and violence in principle; they (just like the Mormons in U.S. history) conveniently hired mercenaries to do violence on their behalf.Nice Mormons my foot. The Mormon Nauvoo Legion militia men at regimental muster, 1865. Imagine a cult starting civil unrest in your country. What would you do? Pass bouquets of roses to them in hope they love you?No you fool. These are separatists who wanted to create their own state carving out swaths of lands within the United States for a Mormon-NationSo at the time of all these insurrections, who should then be this 'authority' on matters of theology, morality and church guidance; the Catholic Church (authorities like Policarp, Ignatius of Antioch, Clement of Rome — who knew the apostles personally) or the Cathars and their supporters who got their doctrines from Mani?And just how many of these 'saints' did the Catholic Church kill? Protestants differ giving numbers in the millions. MacArthur refers to what he called "protestant historian" Dowling who gave the final tally:From the birth of Popery in 600, to the present time, it is estimated by careful and credible historians, that more than FIFTY MILLION of the human family have been slaughtered for the crime of heresy by popish persecutors, an average of more than forty thousand religious murders for every year of the existence of Popery. (Dowling, Book 8, Ch. 1, pp. 542, 543)Except that "John Dowling" was a Baptist “pastor Dowling” and not a “historian”. He held his pastorates in New York, Philadelphia. How could such a blooper enter many books without notice? A Baptist pastor Dowling wrote "The History of Romanism" and no one noticed the man was no historian?Would any historian support such nonsense? No. Not one.But MacArthur insists that there is a "Protestant Historian John Dowling".This is no historian. MacArthur's statement was completely fraudulent.In fact, there are no historians (zip not one) who would put there names on any of these books which circulated for centuries. People who read books by their favorite 'authority' do not know they are being lied to. Pastors write tons of books, and since there is no head authority, accountability is nil, and people who do not know history 'trust and obey' non-authority while they claim that they obey 'only' the Bible.Except no one can find a single 'credible historian' who has ever given such outlandish estimates (50 million) and no historian would ever put their stamps on such books.Yet these books do not disappear or die out. They always revive with modern covers. The only difference between the old writers and the modern ones is that the the old wrote with more skill saying the same slanders, while the modern simply wrote less words with more gloss to their book covers.So how do these writers operate when discussing the so-called atrocities committed by Catholics?This is how: imagine someone machine-gunning "U.S. military forces were directly responsible for about 10 to 15 million deaths during the Korean and Vietnam Wars" then it spilt over where "Vietnamese military and civilian deaths ranged from 1.5 million to 3.8 million" and then comes the results: "The overall conclusion reached is that the United States most likely has been responsible since WWII for the deaths of between 20 and 30 million people in wars and conflicts scattered over the world."And then I would refer to the "list of wars by death toll" which reveals that during World War II we had "58,309,519" casualties of war and "34,016,173" deaths during the conquest of the Americas and then I tally all the way to "100,000–500,000 – Ugandan Bush War (1981–1986)"And then I count how many Europeans they killed during the 1811 German Coast Uprising, World War I, World War II (1941–1945). And then I add in the white on white wars during the American Civil War and the Utah War with Mormons.And then I conclude that America drank the blood of millions of saints.But I still did not get my fill of casualties of war to blame it all on the Americans, and so I go on with pointing how many 'innocent' native Indians, Africans, English and Muslims who were killed by Americans. Than I even add in white-on-white killed during the American Revolutionary War.So I start with the head-scalping pagan red Indians and so I count the Tecumseh's War, War of 1812, Creek War, Chickamunga War, Northwest Indian War, Black Hawk War, Apache Wars, Utah War, Navajo Wars, First and Second Cortina War, Paiute War, Texas-Indian wars, Shays' Rebellion, Whiskey Rebellion, Quasi-War, Dakota War of 1862, Colorado War, Arikara War, Winnebago War, Snake War, Powder River War, Red Cloud's War, Comanche Campaign, Modoc War, Red River War, Great Sioux War of 1876, Buffalo Hunters' War, Bannock War, Cheyenne War, Sheepeater Indian War, Victorio's War, White River War, Pine Ridge Campaign, Yaqui Wars, Moro Rebellion, Crazy Snake Rebellion, Bluff War and the last one the Posey War of 1923.America was involved in many wars.And lest I forget to throw in some Asians and Samoans. Americans after all participated in the Second Samoan Civil War, the Boxer Rebellion in China, the Shimonoseki War with Japan and the Formosa Expedition in Paiwan with the indigenous people of Taiwan and the United States expedition to Korea and the Korean War between 1950–1953. So lets add these.And lest I forget the majors, the Vietnam War (1965–1973) and end it with the Communist insurgency in Thailand (1965–1983). This is just the orientals.And then I count how many Catholics Americans killed during the Mexican–American War, Las Cuevas War, Garza Revolution, Rio de Janeiro Affair (Brazilians), Spanish–American War, Philippine–American War, Border War during the Mexican Revolution, Occupation of Nicaragua, the Occupation of the Dominican Republic, Bay of Pigs Invasion (1961) in Cuba, the Simba Rebellion (1964), Dominican Civil War (1965–1966), Invasion of Grenada (1983) and the Invasion of Panama (1989–1990).And God forbid I forget counting the Orthodox Christians Americans killed during the Russian Civil War and Greek pirates in the Aegean Sea during the Anti-Piracy Operations, the Bosnian War (1994–1995), and the Kosovo War (1998–1999).And to be frank America had no business in these last ones (the Bosnian and the Kosovo War) where president Clinton was involved.And how about we throw in some black folks lest we get accused of racism. So we count all the casualties of the Negro Rebellion (1912) which was Part of the Banana Wars and then the Occupation of Haiti, the Sugar Intervention, the First Seminole War, First Sumatran expedition, Second Seminole War, Intervention in the Somali Civil War (1992–1995) and the Intervention in Haiti (1994–1995).And God forbid we get accused of Isamophobia! So we also add in to our tally Muslims killed by Americans during the First Barbary War and of course lets not forget the Second Barbary War, Lebanon Crisis (1958), Multinational Force in Lebanon (1982-1984), Bombing of Libya (1986), Tanker War (1987–1988) with Iran, the First Gulf War (1990–1991), War in Afghanistan (2001–2014), Second Gulf War (Iraq War 2003–2011), War in North-West Pakistan (2004–present), Libyan Civil War (2011), War on ISIL/ISIS (Operation Inherent Resolve, 2014–present), War in Afghanistan (2015–present).Would that be a just method to evaluate America's evils?There is not a single sane scripture-aloneist who would agree with me on how I just evaluated history. No! Not one.Why? Because this is how liberals argue. Such a tally removed the most crucial elements in evaluating good versus evil: intent, justice, the war on evil, the moral arguments ... and a litany of detail on why each war was fought.In addition, few want to read a tome-like chronology of suffering or an encyclopedia of atrocities committed by their own kind and almost all of them primarily focus on Vietnam or World War II.But only when it comes to the Catholics, things are treated much differently by Bible-aloneists since attacking and hating Catholics is the only accepted prejudice.But when one compares this faulty reasoned 'American war crimes' to the rest of the world's history, such analogy is further destroyed and debunked. Take the first genocides that come up are the most famous; Turkey's Armenian Genocide, the genocides of Nazi-Germany when it controlled Europe, Japan's Nanking, Nazi-occupied Soviet Territories, Ukrainian genocide, Cambodian genocide, the Darfur and the Rwandan Genocide. Did America have anything resembling these? Never.But don't stop there. Lets not forget that when atheism's Mao Zedong aimed to rapidly transform the country from an agrarian economy into a communist society through rapid industrialization and collectivization. The campaign caused the Great Chinese Famine resulting in 18 to 45 million deaths.That last one, many would argue was a grand screw-up and communists call it a simple 'blooper'.But the one that tops them all as far as death toll, some claim is that when Native Americans succumbed to diseases carried by European settlers. Some phony estimates indicate that some 80–90% died in Native American populations during smallpox epidemics. It is said that clothing and blankets known to be infected were given to the native peoples in a attempt to eliminate them. Some accuse that the colonists knew of the weakness the peoples had to disease and some estimates claim it to be up to 100,000,000 people in the largest genocide the world has ever seen.And so now by such simple analogy, these pin-point America, as the worst leading offender when it comes to genocide.And not to forget we already had calculated another 100 million in our previous tally (Indians, Samoans, Blacks, Whites, orientals, Catholics, Orthodox and Muslims) and the numbers are staggering, a whopping 200,000,000.This beats the hell out of anything the Catholic Church has ever done in two millennia that is accomplished in two centuries of American history.But here lays the dilemma with such an outlandish accusation; there is no smoking-gun proof that the white man attempted to spread disease during the American Revolutionary War or any of these wars with the native Americans. What we have is a plenitude of circumstantial evidence. Americans suspected the British were trying to infect their army with smallpox which was prevented. In most cases the evidence against the British is strong, if circumstantial but to claim that George Washington and the White House ordered the extermination of all Indians by disease is completely false.But can anyone name me a single scripture-aloneist who would make such outlandish claims as I just did here about the U.S.?Therefore, the issue is not that such writers are dumb, no, they are blatantly evil and like rabid dogs they give such analogies.My faulty analogy is exactly the type of accusations that are constantly being hurled against Pope Innocent III and even against Pope Pius XII by the so-called scripture-aloneists. What 'scripture alone' truly means is to promote a history void of history.These ignore that slander is a mortal sin even if it is against the Catholic Church. These, like the worst types of liberals, vehemently defend their position claiming that the Catholic Church annihilated 50-100 million 'Bible believing Christians' acting as if the Vatican is a giant battleship with canons protruding on top with secret guillotines and death camps hidden in its basements.Yet no historian will agree with such outlandish numbers and accusations. Dowling himself even admits that “no computation” was done, that the only way to know is that “till the earth shall disclose her blood”.In other words, there was no tally done. Yet an enormous number was provided despite that even the Protestant World Christian Encyclopedia says that Roman Catholics killed 4.9 million Christians. Of course, such source is referring to the dualist Manichaeans, Arians, Cathars, Priscillianists, Paulicians, Bogomiles, Albigenses, Lollards and the pre-reformation separatist Waldensians and Hussites claiming that all these are the best example of ‘Bible believing Christians’.Eliminate these and you have nothing. This comes extremely short of how many Catholics, Orthodox and Mormons America killed during their wars which (whether right or wrong) dwarf anything the Catholic Church did. The “millions” figure is not supported by any historian of worth.It is difficult to manipulate history without notice. This is why such authors including all their followers resort to theologians become self-proclaimed historians.In fact, you can track any of the following names with their countless publications on so-called Catholic atrocities to only find out that the main sources for such false information were not credible:Peter De Rosa (aka Neil Boyd) was not a historian but an X-priest novel writer and Professor of Metaphysics. John Wesley was not a historian but a theologian. Alexander Hislop was not a historian but a Pastor of East Free Church of Arbroath in Scotland. Schmucker was not a historian but a Professor of Theology. William Craig Brownlee was not a historian but a reverend and an American clergyman and professor of languages. Joseph Martin McCabe was not a historian but an x-Catholic priest. Charles Buck was not a historian but a reverend and author of Theological Dictionary. Vergerius was not a historian but a religious ‘reformer’. Thomas Armitage was not a historian but a Protestant theologian. George Bourne was not a historian but a pastor. Cushing B. Hassell was not a historian but a free writer. Dr. M. Geddes was not a historian but a Chaplain. John B. Wilder was not a historian but another 'free writer'. Taylor Bunch was not a historian but a Prophecy author. Nathaniel Crouch (pseud. Robert Burton) was not a historian but an another of these 'free writer'. Henry Southwell was not a historian but a reverend. John Wylie was a not a historian but minister of the Free Church of Scotland. J. M. Carroll was not a historian but a Southern Baptist minister. Avro Manhattan was not a historian but a British writer. Charles Chiniquy was not a historian, but a Canadian x-Catholic priest who was twice suspended from his priestly ministry (for moral turpitude). R. W. Thompson, was not a historian but a politician. John William Bowden was not a historian but theologian. Walter j. Veith is not a historian or a “world acclaimed international lecturer” but a zoologist. Frances L. Carroll, was not a historian but simply a housewife.I could go on and on and on with every author who writes about Catholic genocide claims. Check them out for yourself.Such is the type of references used by evangelical authors when they need to exaggerate historic accounts.This is why they are against authority while they call for 'scripture alone'.With no accountability by a higher order, evangelical authors can do as they wish under the first amendment. But as long as man is man, true science and ripe scholarship, and sound reasoning, can be only the heritage of the few.But while it is difficult to manipulate history without notice, what should be more alarming is that history was manipulated by Protestants without notice by Protestants. Why?This is a monumental fraud that is rarely discussed or is even debated between the two sides. Why? No protestant wants to touch their holy 'theologians' exposed on how these became 'historians'.The reason that no Protestant touches the subject of 'historic fabrications' in a debate with Catholics is for three main reasons:First, they know that they will lose the debate because when it comes to history, Catholics have the upper ground.Secondly, Sola-scripturists do not construct their theology for the sake of theology but to simply attack Catholicism.Thirdly, slandering and hating Catholics is the only accepted prejudice.James White wanted to debate us once wrote "I will be happy to debate Walid in defense of Sola Scriptura, on the Papacy etc ..."But when our reply was to strictly debate the falsification of history, the man knew he was outwitted and he immediately retreated. He knew he would lose. It is the subject they would never touch because these know that Sola-scriptura when examined in light of history becomes bunk.What will they do when we will bring up pages 31-32 in These Three Angels by Jeff Wehr (another none historian) in a cross-examinationon? This one even inflates the numbers from 50 million to 100 million:For professing faith contrary to the teachings of the Church of Rome, history records the martyrdom of more than one hundred million people. A million Waldenses and Albigenses perished during a crusade proclaimed by Pope Innocent III in 1208; beginning from the establishment of the Jesuits in 1540 to 1580, nine hundred thousand were destroyed; one hundred and fifty thousand perished by the Inquisition in 30 years; within the space of thirty-eight years after the edict of Charles V against Protestants, fifty thousand persons were hanged, beheaded, or burned alive for heresy; eighteen thousand more perished during the administration of the Duke of Alva in five and a half years.—Brief Bible Readings for Busy People , No. 8.The source Brief Bible Readings for Busy People used by Wehr, as it turned out, was from an insignificant booklet titled A Brief Bible Studies for Busy People (page 16), which was written by one named Frances L. Carroll.Carroll wasn’t even a historian but a housewife.You heard it right.It even gets worse, she was a housewife doing Jehovah’s Witness witnessing from door to door serving with her husband as full-time volunteer traveling ministers (see link here).Well hello there. We are your neighborhood historians. Did you know the Catholic Church murdered 200 billion people and that there are only 144,000 saints alive on earth?Carroll, the housewife, simply plagiarized Dowling’s quote and simply inserted her own “one hundred million”.Now lets compare what real historians say. After all America decided to uproot the Mormons who became a menace when Joseph Smith swore by the "Quran" and "the Sword" to annihilate his enemies and his own countrymen. America had enough of it and uprooted the buggers.Edward Peters probably one of the foremost expert historians on the subject revealed; the Manichaeans whom the protestants defend were vegans who madly believed that even a fig contained the divine, that it wept when it was plucked, and that after it was eaten one would belch out “particles of God.” They were not allowed to eat eggs, to drink milk, to clear a field of thorns, nor did they eat any animal meat because they believed, like the Hindus, that other souls passed into cattle. They also did not kill animals to avoid offending “the princes of darkness who are bound in the celestials.” (St. Aug. Confessions, 3.18; Concerning Heresies; The sermon of Cosmas the Priest against Bogomilism, in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority, ch. i, pp. 36-7, ch. iii, p. 114) They partook in openly pagan activity, worshipped the moon, the sun, and the stars, even went so far as to pray to demons. (St. John of Damascus, On Heresies, 66)Life itself was considered by the original founder, Mani to be an abomination from which all of humanity should seek to be free. Couples within the cult were told never to conceive offspring, and forbade the propagation of offspring, since this would bring more life into the world. So immense was their hatred for life, that they said that to bring food to a starving human being who was not a Manichaean was to murder the food itself. (St. Aug. Confessions, 3.18; Concerning Heresies, ch. 46, in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority, ch. i, p. 37)They were a cruel bunch, and saw themselves as superior, paralleling the self-exalting spirit of Islam. Like Muhammad, Mani intermixed his heresy with pagan traits; his followers prayed toward the sun in the daytime and toward the moon in the evening. (Augustine, Concerning Heresies, ch. 46, in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority, ch. i, p. 38)The antihuman doctrine of Mani spread to Armenia where its subscribers called themselves Paulicians. (See Skylitzes, Byzantine History, 5.8) The Paulician sect then made its way to the Balkans where it influenced a man in Bulgaria named Bogomil, who would start his own cult in his country. The Bogomils fabricated their own gospel called “The Bogomile Book of John,” in which Jesus tells John that God the Father, pitying the devil, gave power to Satan to create the world, and even to create human beings.Bogomilism went underground, it continued to grow like bacteria multiplying in static murky water in the summer heat. Like the Mormons and the Jehovah’s Witnesses, whenever the Bogomils met someone who they desired to deceive, they flooded the man with all sorts of politeness to undermine his vigilance. As the heretics of America do today, the Bogomils also did not hesitate to call themselves Christian. A certain priest named Cosmas preached a warning on this deceptive polite fiction:The heretics in appearance are lamb-like, gentle, modest and quiet, and their pallor is to show their hypocritical fastings. …The people, on seeing their great humility think that they are orthodox, and able to show them the path of salvation; they approach and ask them how to save their souls. Like a wolf that wants to seize a lamb, they pretend at first to sigh; they speak with humility, preach, and act as if they were themselves in heaven. Whenever they meet any ignorant and uneducated man, they preach to him the tares of their teachings, blaspheming the traditions and orders of the Holy Church. (The sermon of Cosmas the Priest against Bogomilism, in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority, ch. iii, pp. 109, 114, ellipses)But under all of that feigned kindness, was a roaring devil filled with foaming hatred against Christ. They denied the Trinity, called John the Baptist “the forerunner of Antichrist,” and harassed Christians with words such as these: “How can we bow to the cross? Is it not the tree on which the Jews crucified the Son of God? The cross is detestable to God. …Christ neither gave sight to the blind, nor healed the lame, nor raised the dead, but these are the only legends and delusions which the uneducated evangelists understood wrongly.”They rejected any honoring of Mary, hated all church icons, and declared with the utmost sacrilege: “We reject David and the prophets. We admit only the gospel; we do not cary out our lives according to the law of Moses, but according to the law given through the apostles.” (The sermon of Cosmas the Priest against Bogomilism, in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority, ch. iii, pp. 110, 112, 115, 116, ellipses mine)In accordance to the teachings of Mani, whenever a Bogomil would see an infant they would turn away, spit, and cover their faces, since they believed that babies were “little devils.” (The sermon of Cosmas the Priest against Bogomilism, in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority, ch. iii, p. 114)They hated the rich and the tsar of Bulgaria, yet they did not hesitate to take the property of their followers; for that is what heresy desires: power and to replace the Church.By the twelfth century the cult made its way to the richest and most central part of Catholic Europe: Central France, where its followers would adopt the Manichaean title of Cathars, from the Greek word “pure.” (Augustine makes mention of a sect within the Manichaeans called “Catharists” in his Concerning Heresies, ch. 46, in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority in Medieval Europe, in p. 35)It entered southern France when two heretics named Peter of Bruys and Henry entered the land and began to preach Catharism. The natives were so angered by their errors that they seized Peter and burnt him alive. But still the preaching of this heresy continued, and the community was allowed to grow in numbers without any significant intervention on the part of the Church to stop its growth.Like Mani and the Bogomils, the Cathars forged their own bible called “The Catharist Bible.” In this damned book, it says that Jesus was not the eternal Son of God, but only one spirit out of innumerable other spirits in Heaven, Who chose to become the Father’s son after deciding to endure suffering. It also says that John the Baptist was a devil who baptized Jesus:Then, seeing this, the holy Father said: “So then there is not one of you who desires to be My Son?” Then one of the spirits standing by, who was called Jesus, rose up and said: “I myself am willing to be the Son of the Father and to complete all things which are written in that book.” …After baptism by the great demon John, the devil carried Jesus hanging on his neck. (Catharist Bible, 4-6, ellipses mine)And just like the Quran, it then goes on to say that Christ never died, but that only His death was an illusion to the Jews. It reads that “it seemed to the Jews that the Son of God was dead and that after death they had placed him in a sepulchre, nevertheless he was not truly dead, nor was he buried, though he seemed to be so.” (Catharist Bible, 18)As the Manichaeans before them, they believed in the existence of two creators, one good and the other evil. The God of the Old Testament, they believed, was the devil and a “liar”, they also called him a “murderer” because of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, the flood, and the slaughter of the Egyptians through the Red Sea. They called the Law of Moses “evil” because of its intolerance toward depravities and heresies, and they considered Joshua, David, and Moses, as advancers of the evil god, or the devil. Cathars held the deity of the New Testament as the good God, and for this reason they rejected the Old Testament, and their bible would only be a copy of the New Testament. (Peter of les Vaux-de-Cernay, 1.10-12; 2.28, 52, brackets mine; Belloc, The Great Heresies, The Albigensian, pp. 72, 76-7; The sermon of Cosmas the Priest against Bogomilism)And for those who may say that these accusations have no merit because they are from Catholic documents, here are the words from an actual Cathar book:Our opponents [i.e., the Catholics] say that according to Genesis the Lord is the creator of the visible things of this world … But I say that the creator of the visible things of this world is not the true God. And I prove this from the evil of his words and deeds, and the changeableness of his words and deeds as described in the Old Testament. (In Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority in Medieval Europe, ch. iii, document 22, B, p. 135)These blasphemous haters of truth deemed John the Baptist as one of the chief devils; they hated Christ and called Him “evil”, and libelously said that Mary Magdalene was His concubine (with this they agree with Mormonism), and that the true Christ was the one who appeared to St. Paul, since He came in the spirit and not the flesh in His visitation.Marriage was evil, and like the Muslims and Mormons, wine was forbidden. Like the Mormons, they most sacrilegiously said that God had two wives and even begat children with them. And also like the Mormons, they believed that Jesus was the brother of Lucifer. Similar to the teachings of Muhammad, they also denied the Incarnation. All of these beliefs led the Cathars into some very dangerous activities, such as magic and even open devil worship. (See Peter of les Vaux-de-Cernay, 1.10-12; 2.28, 52, brackets mine; Belloc, The Great Heresies, The Albigensian, pp. 72, 76-7; The sermon of Cosmas the Priest against Bogomilism; A Standoff at Lombers, 1165; Ranier Sacconi: A Thirteenth-Century Inquisitor on Catharism. These last three references are in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority, ch. iii, pp. 109, 111, 112, 114, 117, 132)A sect of the Cathars, called Publicans, were said to worship a demon named Luzabel who they believed “presides over all the material creation, and all things on earth are done by his will.”They also made “execrable sacrifices” to this devil. (Ralph of Coggeshall, The Heretics of Rheims, in Alan Charles Kors and Edward Peters, Witchcraft in Europe, part 2, p. 81. That the Publicans were Cathars, see Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority in Medieval Europe, ch. iii, p. 104)It is no wonder, then, that Cosmas, when preaching on the Bogomil Cathars, says: “And they worship the devil to such an extent that they call him the creator of the divine words and ascribe the divine glory to him.” They also believed that “everything exists by the will of the devil”. (The sermon of Cosmas the Priest against Bogomilism, in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority, ch. iii, p. 113)One Cathar named Guillelme Carreria was plowing his fields and the plower’s yoke was displaced, and upon this he said: “Devil, put back that yoke in its proper place!” (The Inquisitorial Register of Jacques Fournier, Invocation of the devil: testimony of Arnaud Laufre, in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority in Medieval Europe, ch. ix, p. 264)Concurring with many of today’s Evangelical Christians, and with the Latter Day Saints, they also believed that the Roman Catholic Church was the Harlot of Babylon of Revelation. They were so entrenched in this belief, that they affirmed that Christ assumed a bodily presence merely to incite us to fight against the Church of Rome, and to ask us to join the Cathar church.In a debate between the Catholic Abbot of les Vaux-de-Cernay and a certain Cathar named Theodoric, the heretic was so trumped and unable to answer his opponent’s arguments, that he said: “The harlot [of Babylon] has kept me long enough, she shall keep me no longer.” (See Peter of les Vaux-de-Cernay, 1.10-12; 2.28, 52, brackets mine; Belloc, The Great Heresies, The Albigensian, pp. 72, 76-7; Englebert, St. Francis of Assisi, ch. v, p. 61)Yet Protestants vehemently defend the Cathars as true Bible believing Christians.As might as these declare the Native Americans as Bible believing Christians as well. Yet they don't. Why? It is because they killed them and not the Catholics.While we agree with Americans when Andrew Jackson was implementing a form of inquisition when he signed the Indian Removal Act of 1830, in which all Indians who did not fully assimilate to American society were to be removed west of the Mississippi.The Creeks and the Chickasaws complied while eight million Cherokees were forced to journey two thousand miles from Georgia to what is today Oklahoma. Twenty percent of them died of starvation, or from rain, sleet, and snow. (See Winston Groom, Patriotic Fire, ch. iv, p. 55, note; ch. xviii, p. 255, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 2006)We should not be ashamed of such history. Americans were suffering from attacks by the Indians and the Mormons similar to those which the Moors afflicted upon the Spaniards and the Cathars afflicted in France during the Cathar wars. I will not ignore that in 1813, just sixteen years prior to the signing of the Act, the Creek Indians executed a gory raid on Fort Mims in Alabama where they butchered two hundred soldiers, massacred two hundred and fifty old men, women and children by fire and tomahawk, and murdered another one hundred friendly Indians. (See William Burdick, Political and Historical Register, vol. i, p. 191; A Copy of a letter from Captain Kennedy Brigadier-General Claiborne, dated Mount Vernon, September 26th, 1813, in T.H. Palmer, The Historical Register, vol. ii, p. 332)I will not ignore the words of an eyewitness to this horror, which state that “blood and brains bespattered the whole earth. The children were seized by the legs, and killed by batting their heads against the stockading. The women were scalped and those who were pregnant were opened, while they were alive, and the embryo infants let out of the womb.” (In Winston Groom, Patriotic Fire, ch. iii, pp. 46-47)Did America, after such an atrocity, strive for a policy of toleration? Did America throw the event under the rug to preserve relations with the Indians? No–America conducted a stern inquisition on the Creeks and commissioned the then Major General Andrew Jackson to crush the threat. When he arrived at a Creek Indian village suspected of having violent intentions toward America, he burnt it to the ground, and if anybody resisted, he ordered them to be seized and executed. (In Winston Groom, Patriotic Fire, ch. iii, pp. 47; ch. iv, p. 48)President Andrew JacksonBut again, I will not condemn Jackson for taking this measure due to the violence and savage raids of the Indians, just as I will not chastise the Spaniards for their expulsion of the Moors for their continuous terror attacks. The infamous Davy Crocket fought under Jackson and when describing the killing of the Creeks, he writes that “we shot them like dogs”. When a Creek squaw, who was guarding a hut hiding many Indians including several dozen warriors, killed an American lieutenant, Jackson’s men shot her down and then burned the entire hut, killing one hundred and eighty Indians. (Winston Groom, Patriotic Fire, ch. iv, p. 49)Sixteen years later, after the Creek War, Jackson passed and advocated the Indian Removal Act which, in a way, could be compared to the sentiments of the Spanish inquisitors. The Inquisition in Spain was done for the establishment of Christian supremacy, in that it wanted the people to integrate into Spanish culture and become Christian, and in comparison, Jackson himself said that one of the purposes of the Indian Removal Act was to have the Indians who refused to assimilate into American society to convert to Christianity. In his own words on the Act:It will separate the Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites; free them from the power of the States; enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude institutions; will retard the progress of decay, which is lessening their numbers, and perhaps cause them gradually, under the protection of the Government and through the influence of good counsels, to cast off their savage habits and become an interesting, civilized, and Christian community. …He [the Indian] is unwilling to submit to the laws of the States and mingle with their population. To save him from this alternative, or perhaps utter annihilation, the General Government kindly offers him a new home, and proposes to pay the whole expense of his removal and settlement. (Transcript of President Andrew Jackson’s Message to Congress ‘On Indian Removal’ (1830), found in ourdocument.gov)I have heard so many times how Ronald Reagan was America’s greatest president. While Reagan is superior to anything we have now, I would contend that Andrew Jackson was America’s greatest president. In 1978, when some righteous conservatives were trying to pass The Briggs Initiative, a measure that would have fired any teacher in California public schools who was homosexual or supported homosexuality, Reagan went against it, writing in one editorialWhatever else it is, homosexuality is not a contagious disease like the measles. Prevailing scientific opinion is that an individual’s sexuality is determined at a very early age and that a child’s teachers do not really influence this (Reagan, (1978-11-01). “Editorial: Two Ill-advised California Trends”. Los Angeles Herald-Examiner. p. A19)When the dangers of homosexuality were arising, Reagan did not combat it head on. Jackson, on the other hand, fought the evils of the pagan Native Indians, who slaughter Americans, head on. This is the righteous way of fighting evil: not to compromise with it, but to destroy it. This is true freedom: to have the liberty to resist and destroy all evil.No one can deny that the expulsion of the Indians made a more peaceful society for the Americans, and that this security still exists today: no one worries anymore about Indians raiding one’s town. This freedom from the capricious hand armed with the tomahawk could only be attributed to the expulsion of the Indians–and as harsh as it sounds, this is only the honest truth that most are too afraid to confront: American civilization would have been impossible to build if Christian Europeans never settled on the land in the first place. Is it Christian supremacy over Indian religion and culture? Yes, it would be dishonest to deny this, but since when were we ever obligated to lament over this very fact? Those who point the finger and look down upon any part of Western history which illustrates Christian supremacy should realize that there is no nation on earth which does not have supremacy.Anyone who next time tells you that the Catholic Church committed genocide have them refute our essay here.Therefore, all these 'scripture aloneists' should start re-educating themselves beginning with doing the sign of the cross, repenting and taking communion. anonymous armageddon isis islam war Major Western Theologians Teach That The Catholic Church Killed One Hundred Million Christians And That The United States Killed Two Hundred Million Native Americans By Walid Shoebat (Shoebat Sunday Special) Many sola-scripturists insist that the Catholic Church killed one hundred million sola-script... Read More...»
Major Western Theologians Teach That The Catholic Church Killed One Hundred Million Christians And That The United States Killed Two Hundred Million Native Americans 0 By Walid Shoebat (Shoebat Sunday Special)Many sola-scripturists insist that the Catholic Church killed one hundred million sola-scripturists and is why they do not trust the Catholic Church. These insist we must search the scriptures and only obey the scriptures.But if I am to only obey and search the scriptures, then my first step is to search the scriptures for the word 'obey'.So what do we find in the scriptures regarding obedience? Besides all the verses that says to obey God, God finally funnels such obedience towards "prelates" "magistrates" "bishops" and church authority. It is just as the Old Testament in ancient Israel funneled all theology to the realm of the Levites."Obey your prelates, and be subject to them" God says in the book of Hebrews (13:17). The reference here is to the religious and not civil authority (see Barnes Notes on Hebrews 13:17).But even civil authorities, Paul in Romans 13:2 includes magistrates and he affirms this in a clear way:"whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves." (Romans 13:2)Therefore, everyone who says that you 'must obey scripture' is biblically sound, while everyone who has ever said that 'you must obey scriptures 'alone', by itself, and by applying their own foreign and personal interpretations, is not sound.So all these Bible-aloneists go against God's ordinances and even scripture itself. It is God Who appoints the authority. So as long as authority does not infringe on your obedience to God, then obedience to such authority is obedience to God, while disobedience to such appointed authority is disobedience to God.These short lines I wrote above should end all arguments. But they don't. Why?The renegade insists on using scripture to determine who is this qualified authority and he is always crying out how corrupt the authority is.But no matter how corrupt the authority is, we have ample and credible Church fathers whom Christians throughout the ages agree were competent and godly saints who correctly interpreted scripture.But ask the renegade to obey these and you will instantly get the same circular reasoning: you must obey scripture alone because the authorities are corrupt, especially that the Catholic Church murdered a hundred million sola-scripturist saints.But the argument still remains: our fathers correctly interpreted the scriptures. Even Christ, He never argued with the authorities knowledge and correct interpretation of scripture, He condemned them for their disobedience of it.But this is the endless circular reasoning you will always encounter with millions of these 'blind leading the bind'. And by this faulty reasoning, the renegade has a goal. It is not 'scripture alone' he wants you to follow but 'him alone'.He demands you obey him. He does this while he says that you 'must obey the scripture'. Reality is, he wants to isolate you to strictly obey his private interpretations of scripture.Why such wolf are evil is simple to explain: the wolf by telling you to obey his interpretations, instead of the fathers interpretations, he masquerades as if he is God. These do not hate authority, they in fact love authority: them.They are rabid blasphemers who claim they have a direct open-line to Jesus as if Jesus did not establish His church.But who is then this 'authority' that scripture speaks of?The bible-aloneist will always argue-100% of the time-of himself as the authority, his pastor, or a book he purchased, or a Youtube video, or a weblink to be such authority. He insists that you immediately need to review and follow his direction. He will instantly state that "Pope Frances is an environmentalist," and "the other pope before him was found kissing a Quran" and that "the Vatican is infested with gays and pedophiles".And so when you address the "gay problem" by using the very scriptures, which he claims to 'obey' and you tell him: these according to the Book of Romans are "worthy of death". Civil authority historically used to punish the homosexual and all this 'love' without punishment simply crept in the last few decades.Say that and these very 'scripture-aloneists' will be the first to turn on you. They say that "according to the New Testament we must love the homosexual" and not punish him.Why then not also love the murderer instead of applying civil punishment? Therefore, by using such an argument we must then all become liberal activists carrying banners that say "united against the death penalty".But you would never see sola-scripturists with a Bible in hand carrying such placards.So even if you bring up the Bible, or even the Church fathers, these would still object arguing that the 'fathers' ordained the "killing of millions of sola-scripturist saints".The Catholic Church, they say, is "drunk with the blood of the saints and the martyrs of Jesus Christ" (Revelation 17:6).Such language is another clue that what you are dealing with here is a wolf in sheep clothing and not a saint. A rabid blaspheming wolf will rarely speak about the blood of millions of Catholics and Eastern orthodox who fought Islam. These will always elevate any heretical blood except the blood of apostolic-successon saints.John MacArthur, for example, rejects the biblical discourses of the fathers and prefers the heretical groups as orthodox Bible expositors writing "While the period [12th-13th century] produced some famous preachers, such as Peter the Hermit, Bernard of Clairvaux, and Thomas Aquinas, none handled the text in an expository fashion. Faint hints of Bible exposition have been detected among independent groups such as the Paulicians, Waldenses, and Albigenses, despite the fact that these groups are commonly dismissed as “heretics.” (MacArthur, Preaching: How to Preach Biblically, ch. 3)To further his defense of these 'heretics' MacArthur says that: "according to Protestant Historian John Dowling, the Roman Catholic Church has put to death more than fifty million of these “heretics” between A.D. 606 (the birth of the papacy) and the mid-1800s" (The MacArthur New Testament Commentary, John 12-21, P.p. 188)HOW TO SPOT A HERETICASK HIM ABOUT HOLY BLOOD AND EXAMINE HIS DUALIST DOUBLE MINDIt is always the case on how you spot the true heretic. To the heretic, only the blood of Catholics and Orthodox is rendered worthless, while the theology of the Manichean Albigenses including their blood is considered sacred-worthy.And this is the case no matter who you deal with from that realm.But you would never find these explain to their congregants who truly are these Paulicians, Albigenses, Bogomils, Manicheans and Cathars.All These were Dualists. Their belief stemmed from the East, from a Zoroastrian named Mani (3rd century). After a pilgrimage to India, Mani came back to preach in Iran. Mani was visited by an angel: the Messenger of the light of Paradise, who asked him to proclaim his doctrine far and wide.Manichaen/Cathar belief is itself a melange of Persian Zoroastrianism and early Christian Gnostic Dualism. The grandfather of dualist doctrines in Europe is Manichaeanism, which flourished in the early Christian era. It died out but dualism didn't. In the twelfth century a new strand erupted from the old: Catharism. This heresy invaded the West from the Balkans and festered in parts of France and Italy.SCRIPTURE SAYS: Beware of a double minded man (James 1:8)These dualists believed in two universal principles, a New Testament good God and an Old Testament violent bad God. This attitude, although sola-scripturists say they reject, yet once you dialogue with them, you will find out a similar duality and a similar 'double-mindedness' in much of what they say. Today these by large isolate the New Testament when it comes to the wars with pagans and heretics. They act as if Christ needed to repeat the Old Testament in the New. They isolate the two as if the Old is rendered worthless. This is why many require verses exclusively from the New Testament to prove a point to today's sola-scripturists.Dualism is why today's sola-scripturist sees that an age of grace would mean that God prohibits wars. It is as if God changed His mind and so they condemn what the church did to the Cathars which was exactly what Joshua, Moses and Judas Maccabees did to combat rampant heresy, syncretism and paganism that went out of hand and gone violent where it only ended by war campaigns.The God of the Old Testament changing His mind about punishing heresy goes against the theology that God does not change. God is the same today, yesterday and forever. This is why when one examines the theology of the fathers, they had no problem with Christian militarism or military expeditions to wipe out violent heretics. These saw the church continuing God's ways, that heresy, gone rampant and unchecked and allowed to fester by violence would destroy the whole batch. So unless it is met with complete annihilation, just as Moses, Joshua, David and Judas Maccabees did before them, it will end up destroying the whole structure of society.Even historian Charles Lea had to admit: “Had Catharism become predominant, its influence would infallibly have proved fatal” (History of the Inquisition, I, 117).But here is my Jesus-style question to all these sola-scripturists who love the Cathars: if the Cathars were so great, why do the liberals, evolutionists, Nazis, ecologists, environmentalists, satanists, agnostics, vegans (all anti-meat eating animal-rights activists) including the 'scripture aloneist' crowds are united in their veneration of the Cathars, while they condemn Catholic veneration of St. Mary?Something is utterly wrong with this picture.Nazis are usually vegan prohibiting meat. In fact Paul prophetically warned of the Cathars and the Manicheans prohibition on marriage and meat:Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron; Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.Yet the scripture-aloneists use this very verse to accuse "priests for remaining celibate" and "Catholic fasting" as fulfillment.Have these forgot: the sacrament of marriage is a Catholic sacrament, not Protestant. Have these forgot, it was the Catholic Church that annihilated the vegans?And what was Bogomil belief whom these defend: rejection of the Trinity, rejection of the Old Testament, rejection of the church hierarchy, rejection of sacraments, and the rejection of meat.The rejection of church hierarchy is the language of all liberals, communists, agnostics, homosexuals, satanists, cultists including the pro-birth control sola-scripturists...The Cathars and Albigenses, just like the sola-scripturists, they had no doctrinal objection to contraception but also believed in euthanasia and assisted suicide through starvation. They believed that all non-procreative sex was better than any procreative sex and that sexual intercourse between man and wife was more culpable than homosexual sex. And since the God of the Old Testament was the devil he committed homicide when he burned up Sodom and Gomorrah. It was easy-go on the sodomites just as we see happening today.To them Christ Who was born in the visible and terrestrial Bethlehem, crucified in Jerusalem, was evil and that Mary Magdalene was his concubine; and that she was the woman taken in adultery while the good Christ, never ate or drank or took upon him true flesh since he was only in this world spiritually in the body of Paul.But they have much in common with sola-scripturists saying that almost all the Church of Rome was a den of thieves; and that it was the harlot of which we read in the Apocalypse. This is where extreme Protestants got the idea from.So the scripture aloneists would argue "why throw out the baby with the bathwater". They in fact agree with the Cathars on many issues. They, so far annulled the sacraments of the Church. They publicly taught that the water of holy Baptism was just the same as river water. That the Host of the Most Holy Body of Christ did not differ from common bread. Confirmation and Confession, they considered as altogether vain and frivolous. They preached that Holy Matrimony was meretricious, and that none could be saved in it, if they should beget children since salvation did not need to show the fruit of good works.Like the Manicheans, the Cathars ate no meat, despised the ecclesiastical hierarchy, rejected the doctrine of the Trinity, and practiced chastity and poverty.So you might think "chastity," why not? Didn't Paul talk about saints dedicating their lives to Christ instead of a spouse?This is the utter hypocrisy one finds today where the youth (especially women) resent marriage while at the same time these condemn priests for celibacy.And after all, Cathars valued the Scriptures and based their theology on their own interpretations instead of the Vatican's. They were, in fact, opposed to procreative sex because it brought other souls into what they viewed as a world of sin.France and Italy between the 11th and 13th centuries had been infected with this dualist Catharism while spreading much violence and the church after decades of attempting to debate with it had to finally deal with it responding to Cathar violence just as the U.S. responded to Mormon violence. While the Cathars (like the Muslim apologists) rejected oath taking and violence in principle; they (just like the Mormons in U.S. history) conveniently hired mercenaries to do violence on their behalf.Nice Mormons my foot. The Mormon Nauvoo Legion militia men at regimental muster, 1865. Imagine a cult starting civil unrest in your country. What would you do? Pass bouquets of roses to them in hope they love you?No you fool. These are separatists who wanted to create their own state carving out swaths of lands within the United States for a Mormon-NationSo at the time of all these insurrections, who should then be this 'authority' on matters of theology, morality and church guidance; the Catholic Church (authorities like Policarp, Ignatius of Antioch, Clement of Rome — who knew the apostles personally) or the Cathars and their supporters who got their doctrines from Mani?And just how many of these 'saints' did the Catholic Church kill? Protestants differ giving numbers in the millions. MacArthur refers to what he called "protestant historian" Dowling who gave the final tally:From the birth of Popery in 600, to the present time, it is estimated by careful and credible historians, that more than FIFTY MILLION of the human family have been slaughtered for the crime of heresy by popish persecutors, an average of more than forty thousand religious murders for every year of the existence of Popery. (Dowling, Book 8, Ch. 1, pp. 542, 543)Except that "John Dowling" was a Baptist “pastor Dowling” and not a “historian”. He held his pastorates in New York, Philadelphia. How could such a blooper enter many books without notice? A Baptist pastor Dowling wrote "The History of Romanism" and no one noticed the man was no historian?Would any historian support such nonsense? No. Not one.But MacArthur insists that there is a "Protestant Historian John Dowling".This is no historian. MacArthur's statement was completely fraudulent.In fact, there are no historians (zip not one) who would put there names on any of these books which circulated for centuries. People who read books by their favorite 'authority' do not know they are being lied to. Pastors write tons of books, and since there is no head authority, accountability is nil, and people who do not know history 'trust and obey' non-authority while they claim that they obey 'only' the Bible.Except no one can find a single 'credible historian' who has ever given such outlandish estimates (50 million) and no historian would ever put their stamps on such books.Yet these books do not disappear or die out. They always revive with modern covers. The only difference between the old writers and the modern ones is that the the old wrote with more skill saying the same slanders, while the modern simply wrote less words with more gloss to their book covers.So how do these writers operate when discussing the so-called atrocities committed by Catholics?This is how: imagine someone machine-gunning "U.S. military forces were directly responsible for about 10 to 15 million deaths during the Korean and Vietnam Wars" then it spilt over where "Vietnamese military and civilian deaths ranged from 1.5 million to 3.8 million" and then comes the results: "The overall conclusion reached is that the United States most likely has been responsible since WWII for the deaths of between 20 and 30 million people in wars and conflicts scattered over the world."And then I would refer to the "list of wars by death toll" which reveals that during World War II we had "58,309,519" casualties of war and "34,016,173" deaths during the conquest of the Americas and then I tally all the way to "100,000–500,000 – Ugandan Bush War (1981–1986)"And then I count how many Europeans they killed during the 1811 German Coast Uprising, World War I, World War II (1941–1945). And then I add in the white on white wars during the American Civil War and the Utah War with Mormons.And then I conclude that America drank the blood of millions of saints.But I still did not get my fill of casualties of war to blame it all on the Americans, and so I go on with pointing how many 'innocent' native Indians, Africans, English and Muslims who were killed by Americans. Than I even add in white-on-white killed during the American Revolutionary War.So I start with the head-scalping pagan red Indians and so I count the Tecumseh's War, War of 1812, Creek War, Chickamunga War, Northwest Indian War, Black Hawk War, Apache Wars, Utah War, Navajo Wars, First and Second Cortina War, Paiute War, Texas-Indian wars, Shays' Rebellion, Whiskey Rebellion, Quasi-War, Dakota War of 1862, Colorado War, Arikara War, Winnebago War, Snake War, Powder River War, Red Cloud's War, Comanche Campaign, Modoc War, Red River War, Great Sioux War of 1876, Buffalo Hunters' War, Bannock War, Cheyenne War, Sheepeater Indian War, Victorio's War, White River War, Pine Ridge Campaign, Yaqui Wars, Moro Rebellion, Crazy Snake Rebellion, Bluff War and the last one the Posey War of 1923.America was involved in many wars.And lest I forget to throw in some Asians and Samoans. Americans after all participated in the Second Samoan Civil War, the Boxer Rebellion in China, the Shimonoseki War with Japan and the Formosa Expedition in Paiwan with the indigenous people of Taiwan and the United States expedition to Korea and the Korean War between 1950–1953. So lets add these.And lest I forget the majors, the Vietnam War (1965–1973) and end it with the Communist insurgency in Thailand (1965–1983). This is just the orientals.And then I count how many Catholics Americans killed during the Mexican–American War, Las Cuevas War, Garza Revolution, Rio de Janeiro Affair (Brazilians), Spanish–American War, Philippine–American War, Border War during the Mexican Revolution, Occupation of Nicaragua, the Occupation of the Dominican Republic, Bay of Pigs Invasion (1961) in Cuba, the Simba Rebellion (1964), Dominican Civil War (1965–1966), Invasion of Grenada (1983) and the Invasion of Panama (1989–1990).And God forbid I forget counting the Orthodox Christians Americans killed during the Russian Civil War and Greek pirates in the Aegean Sea during the Anti-Piracy Operations, the Bosnian War (1994–1995), and the Kosovo War (1998–1999).And to be frank America had no business in these last ones (the Bosnian and the Kosovo War) where president Clinton was involved.And how about we throw in some black folks lest we get accused of racism. So we count all the casualties of the Negro Rebellion (1912) which was Part of the Banana Wars and then the Occupation of Haiti, the Sugar Intervention, the First Seminole War, First Sumatran expedition, Second Seminole War, Intervention in the Somali Civil War (1992–1995) and the Intervention in Haiti (1994–1995).And God forbid we get accused of Isamophobia! So we also add in to our tally Muslims killed by Americans during the First Barbary War and of course lets not forget the Second Barbary War, Lebanon Crisis (1958), Multinational Force in Lebanon (1982-1984), Bombing of Libya (1986), Tanker War (1987–1988) with Iran, the First Gulf War (1990–1991), War in Afghanistan (2001–2014), Second Gulf War (Iraq War 2003–2011), War in North-West Pakistan (2004–present), Libyan Civil War (2011), War on ISIL/ISIS (Operation Inherent Resolve, 2014–present), War in Afghanistan (2015–present).Would that be a just method to evaluate America's evils?There is not a single sane scripture-aloneist who would agree with me on how I just evaluated history. No! Not one.Why? Because this is how liberals argue. Such a tally removed the most crucial elements in evaluating good versus evil: intent, justice, the war on evil, the moral arguments ... and a litany of detail on why each war was fought.In addition, few want to read a tome-like chronology of suffering or an encyclopedia of atrocities committed by their own kind and almost all of them primarily focus on Vietnam or World War II.But only when it comes to the Catholics, things are treated much differently by Bible-aloneists since attacking and hating Catholics is the only accepted prejudice.But when one compares this faulty reasoned 'American war crimes' to the rest of the world's history, such analogy is further destroyed and debunked. Take the first genocides that come up are the most famous; Turkey's Armenian Genocide, the genocides of Nazi-Germany when it controlled Europe, Japan's Nanking, Nazi-occupied Soviet Territories, Ukrainian genocide, Cambodian genocide, the Darfur and the Rwandan Genocide. Did America have anything resembling these? Never.But don't stop there. Lets not forget that when atheism's Mao Zedong aimed to rapidly transform the country from an agrarian economy into a communist society through rapid industrialization and collectivization. The campaign caused the Great Chinese Famine resulting in 18 to 45 million deaths.That last one, many would argue was a grand screw-up and communists call it a simple 'blooper'.But the one that tops them all as far as death toll, some claim is that when Native Americans succumbed to diseases carried by European settlers. Some phony estimates indicate that some 80–90% died in Native American populations during smallpox epidemics. It is said that clothing and blankets known to be infected were given to the native peoples in a attempt to eliminate them. Some accuse that the colonists knew of the weakness the peoples had to disease and some estimates claim it to be up to 100,000,000 people in the largest genocide the world has ever seen.And so now by such simple analogy, these pin-point America, as the worst leading offender when it comes to genocide.And not to forget we already had calculated another 100 million in our previous tally (Indians, Samoans, Blacks, Whites, orientals, Catholics, Orthodox and Muslims) and the numbers are staggering, a whopping 200,000,000.This beats the hell out of anything the Catholic Church has ever done in two millennia that is accomplished in two centuries of American history.But here lays the dilemma with such an outlandish accusation; there is no smoking-gun proof that the white man attempted to spread disease during the American Revolutionary War or any of these wars with the native Americans. What we have is a plenitude of circumstantial evidence. Americans suspected the British were trying to infect their army with smallpox which was prevented. In most cases the evidence against the British is strong, if circumstantial but to claim that George Washington and the White House ordered the extermination of all Indians by disease is completely false.But can anyone name me a single scripture-aloneist who would make such outlandish claims as I just did here about the U.S.?Therefore, the issue is not that such writers are dumb, no, they are blatantly evil and like rabid dogs they give such analogies.My faulty analogy is exactly the type of accusations that are constantly being hurled against Pope Innocent III and even against Pope Pius XII by the so-called scripture-aloneists. What 'scripture alone' truly means is to promote a history void of history.These ignore that slander is a mortal sin even if it is against the Catholic Church. These, like the worst types of liberals, vehemently defend their position claiming that the Catholic Church annihilated 50-100 million 'Bible believing Christians' acting as if the Vatican is a giant battleship with canons protruding on top with secret guillotines and death camps hidden in its basements.Yet no historian will agree with such outlandish numbers and accusations. Dowling himself even admits that “no computation” was done, that the only way to know is that “till the earth shall disclose her blood”.In other words, there was no tally done. Yet an enormous number was provided despite that even the Protestant World Christian Encyclopedia says that Roman Catholics killed 4.9 million Christians. Of course, such source is referring to the dualist Manichaeans, Arians, Cathars, Priscillianists, Paulicians, Bogomiles, Albigenses, Lollards and the pre-reformation separatist Waldensians and Hussites claiming that all these are the best example of ‘Bible believing Christians’.Eliminate these and you have nothing. This comes extremely short of how many Catholics, Orthodox and Mormons America killed during their wars which (whether right or wrong) dwarf anything the Catholic Church did. The “millions” figure is not supported by any historian of worth.It is difficult to manipulate history without notice. This is why such authors including all their followers resort to theologians become self-proclaimed historians.In fact, you can track any of the following names with their countless publications on so-called Catholic atrocities to only find out that the main sources for such false information were not credible:Peter De Rosa (aka Neil Boyd) was not a historian but an X-priest novel writer and Professor of Metaphysics. John Wesley was not a historian but a theologian. Alexander Hislop was not a historian but a Pastor of East Free Church of Arbroath in Scotland. Schmucker was not a historian but a Professor of Theology. William Craig Brownlee was not a historian but a reverend and an American clergyman and professor of languages. Joseph Martin McCabe was not a historian but an x-Catholic priest. Charles Buck was not a historian but a reverend and author of Theological Dictionary. Vergerius was not a historian but a religious ‘reformer’. Thomas Armitage was not a historian but a Protestant theologian. George Bourne was not a historian but a pastor. Cushing B. Hassell was not a historian but a free writer. Dr. M. Geddes was not a historian but a Chaplain. John B. Wilder was not a historian but another 'free writer'. Taylor Bunch was not a historian but a Prophecy author. Nathaniel Crouch (pseud. Robert Burton) was not a historian but an another of these 'free writer'. Henry Southwell was not a historian but a reverend. John Wylie was a not a historian but minister of the Free Church of Scotland. J. M. Carroll was not a historian but a Southern Baptist minister. Avro Manhattan was not a historian but a British writer. Charles Chiniquy was not a historian, but a Canadian x-Catholic priest who was twice suspended from his priestly ministry (for moral turpitude). R. W. Thompson, was not a historian but a politician. John William Bowden was not a historian but theologian. Walter j. Veith is not a historian or a “world acclaimed international lecturer” but a zoologist. Frances L. Carroll, was not a historian but simply a housewife.I could go on and on and on with every author who writes about Catholic genocide claims. Check them out for yourself.Such is the type of references used by evangelical authors when they need to exaggerate historic accounts.This is why they are against authority while they call for 'scripture alone'.With no accountability by a higher order, evangelical authors can do as they wish under the first amendment. But as long as man is man, true science and ripe scholarship, and sound reasoning, can be only the heritage of the few.But while it is difficult to manipulate history without notice, what should be more alarming is that history was manipulated by Protestants without notice by Protestants. Why?This is a monumental fraud that is rarely discussed or is even debated between the two sides. Why? No protestant wants to touch their holy 'theologians' exposed on how these became 'historians'.The reason that no Protestant touches the subject of 'historic fabrications' in a debate with Catholics is for three main reasons:First, they know that they will lose the debate because when it comes to history, Catholics have the upper ground.Secondly, Sola-scripturists do not construct their theology for the sake of theology but to simply attack Catholicism.Thirdly, slandering and hating Catholics is the only accepted prejudice.James White wanted to debate us once wrote "I will be happy to debate Walid in defense of Sola Scriptura, on the Papacy etc ..."But when our reply was to strictly debate the falsification of history, the man knew he was outwitted and he immediately retreated. He knew he would lose. It is the subject they would never touch because these know that Sola-scriptura when examined in light of history becomes bunk.What will they do when we will bring up pages 31-32 in These Three Angels by Jeff Wehr (another none historian) in a cross-examinationon? This one even inflates the numbers from 50 million to 100 million:For professing faith contrary to the teachings of the Church of Rome, history records the martyrdom of more than one hundred million people. A million Waldenses and Albigenses perished during a crusade proclaimed by Pope Innocent III in 1208; beginning from the establishment of the Jesuits in 1540 to 1580, nine hundred thousand were destroyed; one hundred and fifty thousand perished by the Inquisition in 30 years; within the space of thirty-eight years after the edict of Charles V against Protestants, fifty thousand persons were hanged, beheaded, or burned alive for heresy; eighteen thousand more perished during the administration of the Duke of Alva in five and a half years.—Brief Bible Readings for Busy People , No. 8.The source Brief Bible Readings for Busy People used by Wehr, as it turned out, was from an insignificant booklet titled A Brief Bible Studies for Busy People (page 16), which was written by one named Frances L. Carroll.Carroll wasn’t even a historian but a housewife.You heard it right.It even gets worse, she was a housewife doing Jehovah’s Witness witnessing from door to door serving with her husband as full-time volunteer traveling ministers (see link here).Well hello there. We are your neighborhood historians. Did you know the Catholic Church murdered 200 billion people and that there are only 144,000 saints alive on earth?Carroll, the housewife, simply plagiarized Dowling’s quote and simply inserted her own “one hundred million”.Now lets compare what real historians say. After all America decided to uproot the Mormons who became a menace when Joseph Smith swore by the "Quran" and "the Sword" to annihilate his enemies and his own countrymen. America had enough of it and uprooted the buggers.Edward Peters probably one of the foremost expert historians on the subject revealed; the Manichaeans whom the protestants defend were vegans who madly believed that even a fig contained the divine, that it wept when it was plucked, and that after it was eaten one would belch out “particles of God.” They were not allowed to eat eggs, to drink milk, to clear a field of thorns, nor did they eat any animal meat because they believed, like the Hindus, that other souls passed into cattle. They also did not kill animals to avoid offending “the princes of darkness who are bound in the celestials.” (St. Aug. Confessions, 3.18; Concerning Heresies; The sermon of Cosmas the Priest against Bogomilism, in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority, ch. i, pp. 36-7, ch. iii, p. 114) They partook in openly pagan activity, worshipped the moon, the sun, and the stars, even went so far as to pray to demons. (St. John of Damascus, On Heresies, 66)Life itself was considered by the original founder, Mani to be an abomination from which all of humanity should seek to be free. Couples within the cult were told never to conceive offspring, and forbade the propagation of offspring, since this would bring more life into the world. So immense was their hatred for life, that they said that to bring food to a starving human being who was not a Manichaean was to murder the food itself. (St. Aug. Confessions, 3.18; Concerning Heresies, ch. 46, in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority, ch. i, p. 37)They were a cruel bunch, and saw themselves as superior, paralleling the self-exalting spirit of Islam. Like Muhammad, Mani intermixed his heresy with pagan traits; his followers prayed toward the sun in the daytime and toward the moon in the evening. (Augustine, Concerning Heresies, ch. 46, in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority, ch. i, p. 38)The antihuman doctrine of Mani spread to Armenia where its subscribers called themselves Paulicians. (See Skylitzes, Byzantine History, 5.8) The Paulician sect then made its way to the Balkans where it influenced a man in Bulgaria named Bogomil, who would start his own cult in his country. The Bogomils fabricated their own gospel called “The Bogomile Book of John,” in which Jesus tells John that God the Father, pitying the devil, gave power to Satan to create the world, and even to create human beings.Bogomilism went underground, it continued to grow like bacteria multiplying in static murky water in the summer heat. Like the Mormons and the Jehovah’s Witnesses, whenever the Bogomils met someone who they desired to deceive, they flooded the man with all sorts of politeness to undermine his vigilance. As the heretics of America do today, the Bogomils also did not hesitate to call themselves Christian. A certain priest named Cosmas preached a warning on this deceptive polite fiction:The heretics in appearance are lamb-like, gentle, modest and quiet, and their pallor is to show their hypocritical fastings. …The people, on seeing their great humility think that they are orthodox, and able to show them the path of salvation; they approach and ask them how to save their souls. Like a wolf that wants to seize a lamb, they pretend at first to sigh; they speak with humility, preach, and act as if they were themselves in heaven. Whenever they meet any ignorant and uneducated man, they preach to him the tares of their teachings, blaspheming the traditions and orders of the Holy Church. (The sermon of Cosmas the Priest against Bogomilism, in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority, ch. iii, pp. 109, 114, ellipses)But under all of that feigned kindness, was a roaring devil filled with foaming hatred against Christ. They denied the Trinity, called John the Baptist “the forerunner of Antichrist,” and harassed Christians with words such as these: “How can we bow to the cross? Is it not the tree on which the Jews crucified the Son of God? The cross is detestable to God. …Christ neither gave sight to the blind, nor healed the lame, nor raised the dead, but these are the only legends and delusions which the uneducated evangelists understood wrongly.”They rejected any honoring of Mary, hated all church icons, and declared with the utmost sacrilege: “We reject David and the prophets. We admit only the gospel; we do not cary out our lives according to the law of Moses, but according to the law given through the apostles.” (The sermon of Cosmas the Priest against Bogomilism, in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority, ch. iii, pp. 110, 112, 115, 116, ellipses mine)In accordance to the teachings of Mani, whenever a Bogomil would see an infant they would turn away, spit, and cover their faces, since they believed that babies were “little devils.” (The sermon of Cosmas the Priest against Bogomilism, in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority, ch. iii, p. 114)They hated the rich and the tsar of Bulgaria, yet they did not hesitate to take the property of their followers; for that is what heresy desires: power and to replace the Church.By the twelfth century the cult made its way to the richest and most central part of Catholic Europe: Central France, where its followers would adopt the Manichaean title of Cathars, from the Greek word “pure.” (Augustine makes mention of a sect within the Manichaeans called “Catharists” in his Concerning Heresies, ch. 46, in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority in Medieval Europe, in p. 35)It entered southern France when two heretics named Peter of Bruys and Henry entered the land and began to preach Catharism. The natives were so angered by their errors that they seized Peter and burnt him alive. But still the preaching of this heresy continued, and the community was allowed to grow in numbers without any significant intervention on the part of the Church to stop its growth.Like Mani and the Bogomils, the Cathars forged their own bible called “The Catharist Bible.” In this damned book, it says that Jesus was not the eternal Son of God, but only one spirit out of innumerable other spirits in Heaven, Who chose to become the Father’s son after deciding to endure suffering. It also says that John the Baptist was a devil who baptized Jesus:Then, seeing this, the holy Father said: “So then there is not one of you who desires to be My Son?” Then one of the spirits standing by, who was called Jesus, rose up and said: “I myself am willing to be the Son of the Father and to complete all things which are written in that book.” …After baptism by the great demon John, the devil carried Jesus hanging on his neck. (Catharist Bible, 4-6, ellipses mine)And just like the Quran, it then goes on to say that Christ never died, but that only His death was an illusion to the Jews. It reads that “it seemed to the Jews that the Son of God was dead and that after death they had placed him in a sepulchre, nevertheless he was not truly dead, nor was he buried, though he seemed to be so.” (Catharist Bible, 18)As the Manichaeans before them, they believed in the existence of two creators, one good and the other evil. The God of the Old Testament, they believed, was the devil and a “liar”, they also called him a “murderer” because of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, the flood, and the slaughter of the Egyptians through the Red Sea. They called the Law of Moses “evil” because of its intolerance toward depravities and heresies, and they considered Joshua, David, and Moses, as advancers of the evil god, or the devil. Cathars held the deity of the New Testament as the good God, and for this reason they rejected the Old Testament, and their bible would only be a copy of the New Testament. (Peter of les Vaux-de-Cernay, 1.10-12; 2.28, 52, brackets mine; Belloc, The Great Heresies, The Albigensian, pp. 72, 76-7; The sermon of Cosmas the Priest against Bogomilism)And for those who may say that these accusations have no merit because they are from Catholic documents, here are the words from an actual Cathar book:Our opponents [i.e., the Catholics] say that according to Genesis the Lord is the creator of the visible things of this world … But I say that the creator of the visible things of this world is not the true God. And I prove this from the evil of his words and deeds, and the changeableness of his words and deeds as described in the Old Testament. (In Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority in Medieval Europe, ch. iii, document 22, B, p. 135)These blasphemous haters of truth deemed John the Baptist as one of the chief devils; they hated Christ and called Him “evil”, and libelously said that Mary Magdalene was His concubine (with this they agree with Mormonism), and that the true Christ was the one who appeared to St. Paul, since He came in the spirit and not the flesh in His visitation.Marriage was evil, and like the Muslims and Mormons, wine was forbidden. Like the Mormons, they most sacrilegiously said that God had two wives and even begat children with them. And also like the Mormons, they believed that Jesus was the brother of Lucifer. Similar to the teachings of Muhammad, they also denied the Incarnation. All of these beliefs led the Cathars into some very dangerous activities, such as magic and even open devil worship. (See Peter of les Vaux-de-Cernay, 1.10-12; 2.28, 52, brackets mine; Belloc, The Great Heresies, The Albigensian, pp. 72, 76-7; The sermon of Cosmas the Priest against Bogomilism; A Standoff at Lombers, 1165; Ranier Sacconi: A Thirteenth-Century Inquisitor on Catharism. These last three references are in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority, ch. iii, pp. 109, 111, 112, 114, 117, 132)A sect of the Cathars, called Publicans, were said to worship a demon named Luzabel who they believed “presides over all the material creation, and all things on earth are done by his will.”They also made “execrable sacrifices” to this devil. (Ralph of Coggeshall, The Heretics of Rheims, in Alan Charles Kors and Edward Peters, Witchcraft in Europe, part 2, p. 81. That the Publicans were Cathars, see Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority in Medieval Europe, ch. iii, p. 104)It is no wonder, then, that Cosmas, when preaching on the Bogomil Cathars, says: “And they worship the devil to such an extent that they call him the creator of the divine words and ascribe the divine glory to him.” They also believed that “everything exists by the will of the devil”. (The sermon of Cosmas the Priest against Bogomilism, in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority, ch. iii, p. 113)One Cathar named Guillelme Carreria was plowing his fields and the plower’s yoke was displaced, and upon this he said: “Devil, put back that yoke in its proper place!” (The Inquisitorial Register of Jacques Fournier, Invocation of the devil: testimony of Arnaud Laufre, in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority in Medieval Europe, ch. ix, p. 264)Concurring with many of today’s Evangelical Christians, and with the Latter Day Saints, they also believed that the Roman Catholic Church was the Harlot of Babylon of Revelation. They were so entrenched in this belief, that they affirmed that Christ assumed a bodily presence merely to incite us to fight against the Church of Rome, and to ask us to join the Cathar church.In a debate between the Catholic Abbot of les Vaux-de-Cernay and a certain Cathar named Theodoric, the heretic was so trumped and unable to answer his opponent’s arguments, that he said: “The harlot [of Babylon] has kept me long enough, she shall keep me no longer.” (See Peter of les Vaux-de-Cernay, 1.10-12; 2.28, 52, brackets mine; Belloc, The Great Heresies, The Albigensian, pp. 72, 76-7; Englebert, St. Francis of Assisi, ch. v, p. 61)Yet Protestants vehemently defend the Cathars as true Bible believing Christians.As might as these declare the Native Americans as Bible believing Christians as well. Yet they don't. Why? It is because they killed them and not the Catholics.While we agree with Americans when Andrew Jackson was implementing a form of inquisition when he signed the Indian Removal Act of 1830, in which all Indians who did not fully assimilate to American society were to be removed west of the Mississippi.The Creeks and the Chickasaws complied while eight million Cherokees were forced to journey two thousand miles from Georgia to what is today Oklahoma. Twenty percent of them died of starvation, or from rain, sleet, and snow. (See Winston Groom, Patriotic Fire, ch. iv, p. 55, note; ch. xviii, p. 255, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 2006)We should not be ashamed of such history. Americans were suffering from attacks by the Indians and the Mormons similar to those which the Moors afflicted upon the Spaniards and the Cathars afflicted in France during the Cathar wars. I will not ignore that in 1813, just sixteen years prior to the signing of the Act, the Creek Indians executed a gory raid on Fort Mims in Alabama where they butchered two hundred soldiers, massacred two hundred and fifty old men, women and children by fire and tomahawk, and murdered another one hundred friendly Indians. (See William Burdick, Political and Historical Register, vol. i, p. 191; A Copy of a letter from Captain Kennedy Brigadier-General Claiborne, dated Mount Vernon, September 26th, 1813, in T.H. Palmer, The Historical Register, vol. ii, p. 332)I will not ignore the words of an eyewitness to this horror, which state that “blood and brains bespattered the whole earth. The children were seized by the legs, and killed by batting their heads against the stockading. The women were scalped and those who were pregnant were opened, while they were alive, and the embryo infants let out of the womb.” (In Winston Groom, Patriotic Fire, ch. iii, pp. 46-47)Did America, after such an atrocity, strive for a policy of toleration? Did America throw the event under the rug to preserve relations with the Indians? No–America conducted a stern inquisition on the Creeks and commissioned the then Major General Andrew Jackson to crush the threat. When he arrived at a Creek Indian village suspected of having violent intentions toward America, he burnt it to the ground, and if anybody resisted, he ordered them to be seized and executed. (In Winston Groom, Patriotic Fire, ch. iii, pp. 47; ch. iv, p. 48)President Andrew JacksonBut again, I will not condemn Jackson for taking this measure due to the violence and savage raids of the Indians, just as I will not chastise the Spaniards for their expulsion of the Moors for their continuous terror attacks. The infamous Davy Crocket fought under Jackson and when describing the killing of the Creeks, he writes that “we shot them like dogs”. When a Creek squaw, who was guarding a hut hiding many Indians including several dozen warriors, killed an American lieutenant, Jackson’s men shot her down and then burned the entire hut, killing one hundred and eighty Indians. (Winston Groom, Patriotic Fire, ch. iv, p. 49)Sixteen years later, after the Creek War, Jackson passed and advocated the Indian Removal Act which, in a way, could be compared to the sentiments of the Spanish inquisitors. The Inquisition in Spain was done for the establishment of Christian supremacy, in that it wanted the people to integrate into Spanish culture and become Christian, and in comparison, Jackson himself said that one of the purposes of the Indian Removal Act was to have the Indians who refused to assimilate into American society to convert to Christianity. In his own words on the Act:It will separate the Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites; free them from the power of the States; enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude institutions; will retard the progress of decay, which is lessening their numbers, and perhaps cause them gradually, under the protection of the Government and through the influence of good counsels, to cast off their savage habits and become an interesting, civilized, and Christian community. …He [the Indian] is unwilling to submit to the laws of the States and mingle with their population. To save him from this alternative, or perhaps utter annihilation, the General Government kindly offers him a new home, and proposes to pay the whole expense of his removal and settlement. (Transcript of President Andrew Jackson’s Message to Congress ‘On Indian Removal’ (1830), found in ourdocument.gov)I have heard so many times how Ronald Reagan was America’s greatest president. While Reagan is superior to anything we have now, I would contend that Andrew Jackson was America’s greatest president. In 1978, when some righteous conservatives were trying to pass The Briggs Initiative, a measure that would have fired any teacher in California public schools who was homosexual or supported homosexuality, Reagan went against it, writing in one editorialWhatever else it is, homosexuality is not a contagious disease like the measles. Prevailing scientific opinion is that an individual’s sexuality is determined at a very early age and that a child’s teachers do not really influence this (Reagan, (1978-11-01). “Editorial: Two Ill-advised California Trends”. Los Angeles Herald-Examiner. p. A19)When the dangers of homosexuality were arising, Reagan did not combat it head on. Jackson, on the other hand, fought the evils of the pagan Native Indians, who slaughter Americans, head on. This is the righteous way of fighting evil: not to compromise with it, but to destroy it. This is true freedom: to have the liberty to resist and destroy all evil.No one can deny that the expulsion of the Indians made a more peaceful society for the Americans, and that this security still exists today: no one worries anymore about Indians raiding one’s town. This freedom from the capricious hand armed with the tomahawk could only be attributed to the expulsion of the Indians–and as harsh as it sounds, this is only the honest truth that most are too afraid to confront: American civilization would have been impossible to build if Christian Europeans never settled on the land in the first place. Is it Christian supremacy over Indian religion and culture? Yes, it would be dishonest to deny this, but since when were we ever obligated to lament over this very fact? Those who point the finger and look down upon any part of Western history which illustrates Christian supremacy should realize that there is no nation on earth which does not have supremacy.Anyone who next time tells you that the Catholic Church committed genocide have them refute our essay here.Therefore, all these 'scripture aloneists' should start re-educating themselves beginning with doing the sign of the cross, repenting and taking communion. anonymous armageddon isis islam war Major Western Theologians Teach That The Catholic Church Killed One Hundred Million Christians And That The United States Killed Two Hundred Million Native Americans By Walid Shoebat (Shoebat Sunday Special) Many sola-scripturists insist that the Catholic Church killed one hundred million sola-script... Read More...»