ANONYMOUS - OUR VOICE

Major Conservative Media Figure Declares 'You Don't Have A Right To Have Children If You Don't Make Enough Money'

Jerry Agar is a famous conservative media personality from Canada. Working in radio and television in both the USA and Canada and formerly a part of the Sun News Network, Jerry Agar was standing in for Ezra Levant at Rebel Media when he made this segment, entitled' Struggling to pay bills? Then don't have kids':<iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/KYh4c1aK_6E?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe>In addition, Rebel Media posted the following on its Twitter feed:<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/jerryagar1.png"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-109316" height="262" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/jerryagar1-300x262.png" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/jerryagar1-300x262.png 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/jerryagar1.png 605w" width="300" /></a>Rebel Media is a part of the entire "new conservatism" that has emerged over the past ten years that we have heavily criticized for being anything but conservative. This is particularly true with regard to homosexuality, as they heavily promoted Milo Yiannopoulos and currently hose the radio show for Gavin McInnes, who we have shown to be an open supported of homosexuality and bisexuality, as he discusses various acts indetail on his show and even went so far as to make out with Milo.But what bothered me was at 0:47-0:48 he says "Children aren't a right. They are a responsibility."Nobody who has children doubts that they are a major responsibility. Children are little people, and raising little people is a difficult task no matter who does it. They will eat up your time, tax your patience, drain your energy, and interrupt plans, and often at inconvenient times.But children are never, ever not a "right." While certainly there are bad parents and people who do not care and should not be parents, the logical corollary to this is that if children are not a right, then they are a privilege. If children are a "privelage," then it means that having them means they can be taken away from because they do not actually belong to you in the first place. When Mr. Agar's line of logic is followed far enough, it means that children are not just merely not yours but they can be regulated by an outside force, up to and including another person saying "you have had too many children- the government now requires that you are to be sterilized." Not only that, but if children are a "privelage" that is bestowed externally but not an internal gift that is given from God as a part of man's creation, then it means that men would be able to have the power to determine if certain children were "fit" to "be a part of society."This is the approach which certain others nations have taken towards children, most blatantly China. In China, for a long time only one child was permitted. That number has recently been raised to two, and for certain upper middle class or wealthy Chinese, they are able to pay off authorities to let them have a third. But forced sterilization, abduction, forced abortion, and outright murdering children and babies after birth is common place in China because of this way of thinking.<blockquote>If [a woman] lived in a small village, for example, she would probably be scrutinized by a group, she would probably be grouped together with a set of households and come under what they call a cluster leader, somebody who sort of monitors the progress and fertility rights of a certain set of households. ... So if this woman ... fell pregnant then most likely this cluster leader would know about it very quickly and then she would report to higher up. ... Probably at first a village leader would show up at their doorstep and say, "You know very well you should not have this; you could have all sorts of problem with this. You may have to pay a fine." I've met enforcers who have gone to these houses and say, "We used to take away something valuable to show that we mean business." ... Like a television set, for example, or a pig, or sometimes if the household was a very poor household they'll take away homespun cloth or grain or something, something that had to make it hurt, basically — that was in a village setting, of course.In a city setting they could maybe, if you worked for a [civil service-like] job they might threaten to fire you. ... This is for having a child. If you went for a termination, all of this would go away. But, of course, then there were people who really wanted the child and then they would try and evade the whole process of being taken away for a forced abortion, because here's the thing: Between your conception and your delivery date, all bets are off — they can make you. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.npr.org/2016/02/01/465124337/how-chinas-one-child-policy-led-to-forced-abortions-30-million-bachelors">source</a>)</blockquote>But the situation in China or government policy does not even have to be so in other countries for this problem to exist. All that it takes for is for a "eugenics mindset"- a way of looking at the world which says that the lives of certain people are worth less than that of others, and that other men have the right to tell other men who can live and who can die based on their own criterion.A very disturbing example of this is the current state of "birth defects screening," most notably with Down's Syndrome. It was revealed last year that in the tiny nation of Iceland, a nation the size of the state of Tennessee but with fewer people in the whole nation than in just the city of Chattanooga, the abortion rate for potential Down's Syndrome babies is 100%. The crisis is so bad that an Icelandic photographer began taking pictures of people in Iceland with Down's Syndrome in order to help people remember that these people are humans and just as worthy of dignity and life as anybody else.<blockquote>And she is worried that her son will grow up in a world where more parents choose not to give birth to babies diagnosed with the condition. She gives the example of Iceland, where almost everyone screens for Down's and 100% of women who have a positive diagnosis now terminate.Icelandic photographer Sigga Ella, whose aunt had the condition, took a <a class="story-body__link-external" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://siggaella.com/projects/first-and-foremost-i-am/">series of portraits</a> of people with Down's to raise awareness of the Down's community there.But in the UK about a third of pregnant women opt out of screening, so if that remains the case, any of these babies who have Down's will continue to go undetected until they are born.In the UK the new test is being developed by Lyn Chitty at Great Ormond Street Hospital - professor of genetics and foetal medicine.She carried out a study to see what women do when they are offered NIPT. Based on this research she believes that an extra 195 babies with Down's could be diagnosed in England and Wales each year before birth.But even though 90% of women in the UK with a positive Down's diagnosis have abortions, she doesn't believe it means most of these 195 pregnancies will be terminated. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-37500189">source</a>)</blockquote><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/91415522_jakob976.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-109332" height="300" sizes="(max-width: 286px) 100vw, 286px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/91415522_jakob976-286x300.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/91415522_jakob976-286x300.jpg 286w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/91415522_jakob976.jpg 624w" width="286" /></a>Jakob, one of the children in Iceland with Down's Syndrome. Look into his face, and then tell him "you don't deserve to live" while stabbing him repeatedly- because that is what abortion is and is the mindset what men like Mr. Agar have. They would murder children like him in the name of "convenience" and "rights."The modern "conservative movement" clearly has nothing to do with the sanctity of human life. As we have pointed out, both the liberals and the conservatives do not care about people- they see them as means to an end for their particular political ends.I remember three years ago when MSNBC anchor Melissa Harris Perry went on television and outright said that "children do not belong to their parents, but to whole communities." I remember the outrage on "conservative media" about how horrible she was for saying, this, how she was advocating that the government should take children, and how "conservatives" need to stand against this.<iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/pKjwe-bMl7Y?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe>Now I look at the new "conservative" media, and what is Agar doing any different from Perry? It is not at all, except the difference is that the one speaking is a guy named Jerry Agar and the other is a woman named Melissa Perry. Both of them are poisoned with a eugenics mindset, both of them want to government to come and control your life and your fertility, and both of them want to play "god" with other people because they think they have a right to determine who lives and who dies. Both of them are evil. However, I have far more respect for Melissa Perry not because I agree with her at all, but because the "Democrat" or "liberal" (call it what you will) agenda in America is openly eugenicist. They are eugenicists, but they don't try to hide and instead they brag about it. To their credit, they are at least being honest with themselves and their viewers, while conservatives such as Agar will wrap themselves in the mantle of "traditional values" and "family values" all the while they are just as murderous and deceitful as the liberals are.And coming back to the issue of eugenics, what true good has it done? Again, look back at the situation in China. By aborting and adopting out (mostly to American and European families) millions of baby girls in favor of baby boys, the result is a dearth of available women to marry and glut of single, unhappy young men with, in their minds, no prospects for a future and no idea what to do.In the case of Europe, while abortions are common, the issue is a limited family size that has caused a precipitous drop in population which in turn has created voids in the society. Jobs that need to be filled are not being filled because there are not enough people to fill them. So what has happened was that Muslims were brought over to fill the population gap left by the European people who refuse to reproduce (while some of this is certainly for policy reasons and political manipulation, there is also are real crisis going on). One only needs to turn on the news media to see what the result of this has been as Europe is literally being assimilated into the Middle East and North Africa.In America, the issue is not as serious yet because of the immigration and how Americans, until recently, were at replacement rate with fertility but have since fallen. The result you see in the same- large numbers of immigrants, a changing culture, and social unstability.Now the issue which I am driving at here is not that "immigrants are bad" or that "people should not take responsibility for themselves." Not the least. What I am saying is that society belongs to the people who show up, and if you do not have the children to occupy society as simply a part of your basic duty of being alive, then just like a house left vacant, somebody else will show up to occupy it, and the way to prevent this is to do what God said, which is to "be fruitful and multiply."With regard to the issue of government welfare programs, that is a completely separate issue divorced from the fertility question. The willingness or unwillingness of parents to take care of their children is a matter of character. As I said earlier, parenting is hard work and requires a lot of sacrifice. One only needs to look at the old European immigrant families of the last century or at the many countless peoples across the world who give up la dolce vita in order to do what is good and right for their families.If you ever have a chance, go down to your local "Deparment of Human Resources" or "Department of Social Services" office and attempt to apply for food stamps. You will get an application, and with that application (either separately or on the same paper attached to it) you will receive a mandatory paper asking you to register to vote if you have not already. This happens in every state. While one is not required to register, the fact is that the government welfare programs are entirely connected to vote grabbing from the Democrat as well as Republican parties. Welfare is simply a tool of public policy, a means of wealth transfer to promise the Roman idea of "bread and circuses" to the masses while not caring about whether or not this behavior encourages  people to care about their stuation or not. That is the main issue with welfare that nobody wants to address.People will rise to the occasion throughout history, and private charity through the Churches has always been used to help the truly destitute and needy, who we have a moral obligation to help. But helping society does not come through promoting eugenics in any form, and most certainly not through the deceitful idea that children are somehow property of anybody else but their parents regardless of who says it.

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Major Conservative Media Figure Declares 'You Don't Have A Right To Have Children If You Don't Make Enough Money'

Jerry Agar is a famous conservative media personality from Canada. Working in radio and television in both the USA and Canada and forme...

ISIS Takes Over Town In Egypt, Sets Up Military Checkpoints And Is Checking ID Cards To Hunt Down Any Remaining Christians There

<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/291E4E9100000578-0-image-a-1_1432919368973.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-109330" height="191" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/291E4E9100000578-0-image-a-1_1432919368973-300x191.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/291E4E9100000578-0-image-a-1_1432919368973-300x191.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/291E4E9100000578-0-image-a-1_1432919368973.jpg 634w" width="300" /></a>Scarcely two weeks ago, we reported that hundreds of Christians were found fleeing from the town of El-Arish, Egypt as ISIS closed in and promised to hunt down, round up, and exterminate all Christians.In another breaking move, it has come out that ISIS has just set up checkpoints in and around El-Arish and are checking everybody's ID cards looking to see if that person is a Christian so they can arrest them and take them away for torture and death:<blockquote>Islamic State militants appeared online on Sunday evening in Egypt's North Sinai city of Al-Arish manning checkpoints and checking ID cards in search of Egyptian Christians.The photos, published online, come after a number of security convoys and police stations were targeted by the IS affiliate, known as the Sinai Province, over the last week.The images showed a number of masked Sinai Province militants inspecting civilian vehicles and checking ID cards in a street near El Faleh Square in central Al-Arish.It also showed IS militants carrying different types of guns, along with heavy military equipment like rocket-propelled grenades.According to Mada Masr, and Egyptian news website, IS militants who were manning the checkpoints had said they were “looking for Copts.” (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.persecution.org/2017/03/14/isis-intercepts-coptic-christians-fleeing-el-arish/">source</a>, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/militants-setup-checkpoints-across-egyptian-city-al-arish-326732027">source</a>)</blockquote>History repeats itself again...<iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/ZiQL71kV4t8?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war ISIS Takes Over Town In Egypt, Sets Up Military Checkpoints And Is Checking ID Cards To Hunt Down Any Remaining Christians There

Scarcely two weeks ago, we reported that hundreds of Christians were found fleeing from the town of El-Arish, Egypt as ISIS closed in a...

Muslim Terrorist Attacks Christian Man And Slits His Throat, The Government Of Egypt Catches Him And Sentences Him To Death

The Muslim terrorist in Egypt who slit a Christian man's throat, a horrific event which <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2017/03/09/muslim-terrorist-ambushes-christian-man-and-slits-his-throat-and-feels-absolutely-no-remorse-about-it/">we have reported on before</a>, has been sentenced to death by the government of Egypt. As we read in <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.enca.com/africa/egypt-sentences-man-to-death-for-killing-christian">one report:</a><blockquote>An Egyptian court sentenced a Muslim man to death on Thursday for murdering a Christian who sold alcohol, security and judicial officials said.The court in the Mediterranean city of Alexandria issued its sentence after receiving approval from the mufti, the official interpreter of Islamic law whose role is advisory.The verdict can be appealed.Adel Abu al-Nur el-Sayed, 50, was accused of killing 61-year-old Youssef Lamei, a Coptic Christian, on 2 January in Alexandria.Sayed had walked up to Lamei as he sat outside his liquor store and slit his throat, the victim's son Tony Youssef, who witnessed the murder, told AFP.Sayed later told the court that he would kill all alcohol sellers if he could, judicial sources said.Consumption of alcohol is forbidden in Islam.Sayed was present in court on Thursday, according to a security official.Egypt's Coptic minority has been on edge after a series of attacks.On 11 December, a suicide bomber claimed by the Islamic State group struck a Cairo church during a service, killing 29 people.The group's Egypt branch said in December it would continue attacks against "every infidel and apostate in Egypt, and everywhere".The jihadists had mostly targeted Egypt's security forces in the north of the Sinai Peninsula since the army overthrew Islamist president Mohamed Morsi in 2013.</blockquote><div class="entry-content wow fadeInUp"><div class="hide-for-small-only">

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Muslim Terrorist Attacks Christian Man And Slits His Throat, The Government Of Egypt Catches Him And Sentences Him To Death

The Muslim terrorist in Egypt who slit a Christian man's throat, a horrific event which we have reported on before , has been sent...

New Jersey Town Rejects Mega Mosque Application After It Doesn't Get Enough Votes, Now The Justice Department Is Investigating

Last year we documented how a <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2016/06/22/new-jersey-battle-for-bayonne-between-american-patriots-and-muslim-interlopers-who-are-demanding-to-build-yet-another-massive-jihad-indoctrination-center-in-a-predominantly-christian-neighborhood/">major mosque was being placed in a quiet suburban neighborhood in New Jersey.</a> The city voted in favor of the mosque, but it did not receive enough votes for approval.Now in a sudden change, the Federal Justice Department is going to investigate the matter:<blockquote>The federal Justice Department plans to investigate the now rejected application for a Muslim community center in Bayonne, according to a report in The New York Times.Bayonne Muslims, a nonprofit group, spent nearly two years trying to get approval to build the mosque and community center at 109 East 24th St. The Zoning Board voted against the proposal on Monday night.Waheed Akbar, a spokesman of the organization, told The New York Times that the Federal Justice has contacted the organization and "would investigate the matter." The group is also planning its own lawsuit, according to the report.While many argued the neighborhood was not the suitable place for the Muslim center, citing parking and traffic issues, tensions were high at times during Monday's meeting. One resident negatively recited parts of the Quran.The board voted 4-3 in favor of the group's plans, but five votes were needed for approval. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nj.com/jjournal-news/index.ssf/2017/03/bayonne_muslims_group_plans_la.html">source</a>)</blockquote>The issue is very clear- the mosque was not build not because the city rejected it, but because it did not get enough votes to be build. There is nothing to investigate here because the votes were matters of people's opinion. But that is besides the point, because this article strikes to the heart of a very important matter, and that is the Islamization of the United States through the arm of the Federal, State, and local governments.<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Blackflag.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-109311" height="151" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Blackflag-300x151.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Blackflag-300x151.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Blackflag.jpg 598w" width="300" /></a>When people think about Islamization, they think about the Muslim conquests of ages past, and in a historical sense, this is correct as Islam was "spread by the sword" and continues to propagate itself on the conditions of "convert or die." However, just as America is unique among nations in the way she was constructed and the way she interacts with her people and the world, in order for America to be seduced and conquered by Islam it would have to take place in a way that would exploit and conquer it based on its unique weaknesses and faults.<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/soldierandterrorist1.png"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-109312" height="199" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/soldierandterrorist1.png" width="253" /></a>These guys don't have a chance against the military- unless they are intentionally allowed to have an advantage (such as with ISIS, and for political reasons).America's weakness is not its military might. Even during our weakest moments, America is a warring nation with a history of violence by starting as well as finishing fights. As a nation, America would have NO problem fighting and defeating major enemies- minor ones, such as petty Islamic terrorists, are no match for the US Military. The idea that Islamic jihad is going to conquer America like how ISIS conquered the Christians of Syria is, on its own merits, highly unlikely.<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/religiousymbols.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-109319" height="178" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/religiousymbols-300x178.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/religiousymbols-300x178.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/religiousymbols.jpg 588w" width="300" /></a>The fantasy and heresyAmerica's issue comes from the corruptability of her soul, which is again an issue that goes back to her early days as a nation. In short, America has been a patchwork of various and may times, opposing philosophies and ideas rolled into one contiguous unit. Now while all societies have certain inconsistencies or long-term problems in them, America's go right to her foundation. Essentially, "what is America?" Is she a Christian nation? Is she a secular nation? Is she an "Islamic" nation (as some Muslims will argue)? There has never been a clear answer to these and the many other related questions, and the way such questions are often answered in society is by the privatization of belief and the publicization of a generally accepted "idea" that the majority agrees upon at the current time but which can and does change with the spirit of the age.<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/80751609.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-109320" height="222" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/80751609-300x222.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/80751609-300x222.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/80751609-768x568.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/80751609.jpg 1024w" width="300" /></a>Take for instance communism. "Good Americans" were anti-communist during the 1950s not so much because they opposed the philosophical bases upon which communism is based, but because that is what a "good American" supports. Now that communism is considered more "socially acceptable" by the masses, it is no longer per se a bad thing to be a communist in the eyes of the public.<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/LGBTTT-1.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-109321" height="143" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/LGBTTT-1-300x143.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/LGBTTT-1-300x143.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/LGBTTT-1-768x367.jpg 768w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/LGBTTT-1-1024x489.jpg 1024w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/LGBTTT-1.jpg 1080w" width="300" /></a>The same situation exists with the LGBT movement. While most Americans claim to be Christians and Christianity has always taught that homosexuality was a sin, and for much of America's history there were laws against homosexual behavior, the reason was because "good Americans" supported this view because that is what a "good American" supports. Now that the spirit of the times has changed, it is now a major social sin to simply preach Biblical truth about the innate evil that is the LGBT movement today.<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/islamconquerworld.png"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-109322" height="300" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/islamconquerworld-249x300.png" width="249" /></a>The way for America to be conquered by Islam is not from without, but from within by disposing her favorably to Islam over Christianity, and the way this will come is through America's legal system. In the name of "upholding the law," all the Muslims will have to do is set themselves up in legal situations where they can exploit the current "social virtues" of "egalitarianism," "anti-racism," and "religious tolerance" to allow for laws to be passed and institutions to arise that promote Islamization.The Muslims know this well. Why do you think there are so many lawsuits that Muslims file or threaten to file over small matters? Why do Muslims bring so many cases to court? Why is there such a push for Muslims to go into law school and become lawyers and eventually, judges? Simply put, if the Muslims can exert a disproportionate influence on America's legal system, they can change the public perception of Islam thorugh the laws, and thus can Islamize the USA without formal Islamization.<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/ap_16251572497208_1_custom-ef1253d5672703ba94bbd415f75d1987103dd7fc-s400-c85-300x223.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-109323" height="223" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/ap_16251572497208_1_custom-ef1253d5672703ba94bbd415f75d1987103dd7fc-s400-c85-300x223-300x223.jpg" width="300" /></a><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2016/09/08/obama-nominates-foreign-born-muslim-to-become-federal-judge-this-is-the-beginning-of-shariah-law-and-the-end-for-american-law-as-we-know-it/">Abid Qureshi</a>, the first Muslim nominated by Obama to be a federal judge. Expect this trend to continue, and note this is what I warned about. Muslims will not have to "invade" America. They will be given control of the nation after which they will influence it with Islamic ideas from the inside out.Now think about Islamic theology and how this fits into the picture. One of the hallmarks of Islamic theology is the concept that "Allah does what he wills". Theologically speaking, Allah is a diety whose nature is defined in term of his absolute will. Allah acts as he wills because he wills do on the reason being that is what he willed. He is not defined in terms of anything positive, such as how God in the Bible is defined as being Love itself, and therefore anything outside of that love is a perversion. While Allah has 99 names which describe him (and many contradict each others), these attributes do not address his nature, and that which they allude to about his nature is that his nature is a product of his will. As such, Allah can do good as well as evil so if he should will it. This idea alone is proof that Allah is demonic because a demon does not act in accordance with what is truly good and right, but acts capriciously.St. Juan de Ribera wrote that the most pernicious of all opinions was the idea that such a thing as the "multiplicity of religions" could exist, because has he outlined in his book, A Moorish Catechism, he says that the society revolves around the religion upon which it is based because it provides the unifying principle for the rulers and the ruled. To take away the unifying religion or introduce multiple religions is to take away the main philosophy or to introduce multiple, competing philosophies with different ends and reasons into a society. The result of this is naturally either a chaos and conflict between the different groups, or the subordination of the groups to a "greater idea" that "all can agree upon" which by its agreement between both groups becomes recognized as the dominant philosophy over the others. In other words, a new religion is created to accomodate the conflict between the other religions.This creation of a "new religion" to accomodate intrinsically different beliefs, while throughout history a source of major tension in Christianity and which resulted in the many councils and arguments of early Christian history, happens all the time in America and with such casualness as changing clothes. For every religious difference in America there is a church to accomodate it, and the majority of these people will all call themselves "Christians" even though they hold views that are openly heretical against each other.This also explains why the Catholic Church has always been a disliked minority in the United States. The formal position of the Catholic Church is that while supporting the positive and commendable positions of American society, it also is formally opposed to the subjugation of religious teachings to state power or the idea that there is an equality between religions. This conflict is so strong that it is not only the basis of much of the anti-Catholicism which has penetrated throughout American history, but it also stretches to within the walls of the Catholic Church in the United States itself.Throughout history, the great saints have stated that Islam is merely the final culmination of all Christian heresy. It was no accident that Islam emerged out of the Arabian peninsula, for while the Byzantine Empire had been fighting against heresies for centuries, Arabia was the formal place of exile for all Christian heretics as well as a place filled with many other religious beliefs. In this sense, Arabia was a true society that practiced "religious pluralism" as many diverse and opposing religions lived with each other and while at times fighting for power, lived in peace alongside each other and accepted each other's beliefs in a spirit of general tolerance.Yet America, like Arabia of antiquity, prides itself on its "religious freedom" almost as much, and perhaps more so than their own beliefs. It is no surprise that in America there is no "official" religion but a multiplicity of cults, strange religious beliefs, and outright bizarre and evil practices such as those in occultism, witchcraft, shamanism or paganism. Christianity may be the dominant religion, but that Christianity is not per se a religion based on what Sacred Scripture and Tradition teach, but what a man interprets them to be in his own personal context upon which he bases his own "church" and sets himself up as the "authority" for teaching (what is in the case the Bible) right and wrong.Now this lack of a clear focus is essentially the creation and maintenance of a religious vacuum. If the public opinion were to be changed about a particular belief system, then it could attempt to fill that vacuum. This is ideal for Islam, since as I have said before, Islam is not just a culimation of heresy, but it also fills a spiritual vacuum where Christianity once was.The precipitious decline of Christianity is America in all its forms is also a product of the same "religious pluralism" that has allowed for a multiplicity of sects and cults to emerge. If a man is able to create his own church and interpret divine truth from a book on his own authority, what is to stop him from defining right and wrong on the basis of what he wills? There is nothing, and America's attitude towards religion only encourages this problem by creating the conditions in which it can grow and spread unchecked in society.Like with many of the issues in the West, the rise of Islam is not a surprise. Like a weed in the garden, Islam is easily nourished by the general moral decline and rejection of anything Christian in combination with the licensious attitude towards religions that have nothing to do with Christianity.Stopping the installation of a mosque in one's neighborhood is a major issue. So is the fact that the Federal government is clearly attempting to strong-arm this community into building the mosque against its will. At the same time, these are symptoms of a greater underlying causes that allowed this to happen in the first place, which is America's embrace of all ideas a beliefs heretical going back to its earliest days and finally manifesting in modern times on account of the decline of the people. The seeds were always there- they just need the right conditions in order to sprout and grow into a mature plant.

anonymous armageddon isis islam war New Jersey Town Rejects Mega Mosque Application After It Doesn't Get Enough Votes, Now The Justice Department Is Investigating

Last year we documented how a major mosque was being placed in a quiet suburban neighborhood in New Jersey. The city voted in favor of...

Germany Plans On Increasing Its Military Size To Close To A Quarter Of A Million Soldiers

Germany is planning on increasing its military size to close to a quarter of a million soldiers. I did a whole video on this:<iframe src="http://shoebattube.com/player/embed_player.php?vid=1351&width=660&height=440&autoplay=no" width="660" height="440" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>According to <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.dw.com/en/germany-to-expand-bundeswehr-to-almost-200000-troops/a-37655018">the report:</a><blockquote>Germany's Defense Ministry has announced it will increase the number of professional soldiers by around 10 percent. It comes amid increasing pressure for Germany to reach its NATO-mandated defense spending target.Since the end of the Cold War, Germany had been reducing its military scope and manpower. Recent years, however, have marked a major shift in its defense policy, as it pledged once again to expand the Bundeswehr."The Bundeswehr is under demand like never before," Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen (a Christian Democrat) said on Tuesday, as she announced plans to increase the number of Germany's professional soldiers from 178,000 to 198,000 by the year 2024. "In light of these increasing responsibilities, the Bundeswehr must be allowed to grow accordingly."As part of its enlargement plans, the Bundeswehr will also expand its non-combat civilian employees to over 61,000 in response to the growing threat of cyber and hacking attacks.Bundeswehr soldiers are currently being deployed as part of international efforts against the so-called "Islamic State" (IS) in Iraq and Syria, in Mali as part of the UN's MINUSMA mission and in the Baltic States as part of NATO's defense measures along the alliance's eastern flank with Russia. German capacity in the area of cyber defense has also been growing.Since the end of the Cold War and German reunification, the Bundeswehr has seen sharp fall in the number of full-time professional soldiers. At the time of reunification, the German military boasted a manpower of some 585,000 soldiers. That number had sunk year-on-year up until 2016, when in May the Defense Ministry said it was expanding the number of professional by 7,000 and civilian employees by 4,400. An end to mandatory military service for school leavers, albeit with other options for those who did not want to spend their year in the Bundeswehr, had contributed markedly to the decline.</blockquote>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Germany Plans On Increasing Its Military Size To Close To A Quarter Of A Million Soldiers

Germany is planning on increasing its military size to close to a quarter of a million soldiers. I did a whole video on this: According...

The Government Of Japan Is Going To Send Right Near China The Largest Warship It Owns, In The Strongest Show Of Military Force It Has Ever Displayed Since The Second World War. This Is Another Sign That War With Japan Is Inevitable

The government of Japan is going to be sending, right near China, the largest warship it owns, in its strongest show of military force since the Second World War. It just another evidence as to the inevitability of war in East Asia. I did a whole video on this:<iframe src="http://shoebattube.com/player/embed_player.php?vid=1350&width=660&height=440&autoplay=no" width="660" height="440" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>According to<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rt.com/news/380526-japan-warship-china-sea/"> the report:</a><blockquote><div class="article__summary summary ">Japan is planning to dispatch its largest warship to the disputed South China Sea for a three-month tour, multiple sources told Reuters. The move would be Tokyo's biggest show of naval force since World War II.</div></blockquote><div class="article__text text js-mediator-article"><blockquote>The helicopter carrier ‘Izumo’ will set off in May, making stops in Singapore, Indonesia, the Philippines and Sri Lanka before joining the Malabar joint naval exercise with Indian and US naval vessels in the Indian Ocean in July, according to three sources.“The aim is to test the capability of the ‘Izumo’ by sending it out on an extended mission,” one of the sources told Reuters. “It will train with the US Navy in the South China Sea."Another source said Japan wants to invite Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte – who has pushed ties with China in recent months – to visit the warship when it arrives in Subic Bay, located about 100km (62 miles) west of Manila.A spokesman for Japan's Maritime Self Defense Force declined to comment on the report.The ‘Izumo’, which measures 249 meters (816 feet) long, is as large as Japan's World War II-era carriers and can operate up to nine helicopters. Its primary mission is anti-submarine warfare.Japan has classified the warship as a destroyer, as the pacifist constitution forbids the acquisition of offensive weapons. However, the vessel allows Japan to project military power well beyond its territory.</blockquote><div id="inarticle_wrapper_div"><div id="inread1_26817"><blockquote><div id="inread_26817" class="mainAdView">Any plan to dispatch the ‘Izumo’ to the South China Sea is likely to anger Beijing, which lays claim to almost all of the resource-rich waters – despite competing claims from Vietnam, the Philippines Taiwan, Malaysia and Brunei.</div></blockquote><div class="mainAdView"><div class="columns__content"><div class="article "><div class="article__text text js-mediator-article"><blockquote>On Friday, a Chinese official advised soldiers to “stay vigilant” when it comes to defending its interests in the South China Sea, adding that China will follow any military vessels traveling within its controlled areas and intercept “intruding aircraft.”Although Japan does not have any claim to the waters, it has a separate maritime dispute with Beijing in the East China Sea.Earlier this month, China's ambassador to Japan accused Tokyo and Washington of portraying Beijing as an enemy to strengthen their security alliance. The statement came after the Trump administration vowed to maintain Washington's long-standing security alliance with Japan, especially when it comes to the East China Sea.In February, China reminded the US that it has “inherent” sovereignty over the disputed East China Sea islands, after Defense Secretary James Mattis vowed to continue to protect the territories on behalf of Japan.Beijing has repeatedly warned Washington and Tokyo against direct interference in the region, either with military drills or freedom of navigation patrols. It has vowed to do everything in its power to protect China's sovereignty claims.</blockquote>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war The Government Of Japan Is Going To Send Right Near China The Largest Warship It Owns, In The Strongest Show Of Military Force It Has Ever Displayed Since The Second World War. This Is Another Sign That War With Japan Is Inevitable

The government of Japan is going to be sending, right near China, the largest warship it owns, in its strongest show of military force ...