Hillary Clinton Works With Three Major Islamic Terror Leaders Who Want To Kill Christians And Make America Into An Islamic Country, Donald Trump Must Bring This Up In The Debates To Crush Her 0 By Walid ShoebatBring up “Trump-Putin” relations in the debates next Monday and Trump should bring up Hillary's three secret ‘love affairs’ with major Muslim Brotherhood operatives while he makes the case for his complement of Putin. This will be long (7000 words), detailed and loaded with documents, translated links, packed with evidence on Hillary's affairs with Muslim Brotherhood operatives who intend to destroy us from within. It must be circulated and carefully studied.But before we disclose all the juicy details, there is no question, the issue of Donald Trump complementing Russia's President Putin will come up during the debate. If I was Trump I will remind Hillary Clinton once compared Putin with Hitler. Lets compare and see who better qualifies to win the 'Hitler award'. Hillary is one who does not mind putting evil Hitler to good use, so long it advances another evil: Hillary.Trump complemented Putin, sure, but should her photo here be misconstrued as "Hillary meeting with Hitler"? Had Jesus been here, in our times, a photo of His temptation will definitely be misconstrued as "God's secret pact with the devil". Even God's testing of Job via Lucifer will be considered history's great conspiracy. History always gets twisted by politicians and slanderers. But it is only History that will eventually set the record straight regarding the truth.Trump can easily flip the table showing she is guilty of the very thing she accuses Putin of. But first, he must ask, shouldn't it be prudent and wise for a U.S. Presidential candidate to deal with and address the wide variety of passé mass culture clichés and stereotypes that were developed during the Cold War about Russians? Would we dare say all what we say about Putin what is said about the Jewish people? Carl Marx and Lenin were Jews, Communism therefore should be a Jewish conspiracy?Is hating Russia the other only accepted prejudice after hating Catholics? When it came to hating Catholics, even John McCain had to denounce anti-Catholic pastor John Hagee who endorsed McCain during his failed presidential race.Yet so many of these American politicians, like Hillary Clinton, including many others even in the Republican Party do the same to Russians as Hagee did with Catholics. When it comes to Putin they paint him as the most evil dictator of our times while forgetting that the U.S. protects and defends evil allies that Putin pales in comparison to when it comes to their tyrannical rulers.Saudi Arabia, the mother of all Wahhabi terrorism, is still officially an ally of the U.S. America even invaded Iraq to protect Saudi Arabia and now we have the Middle East implode as result. It was Mr. Dmitry Peskov, the press spokesman for the Russian President, lambasted the Saudi regime for sowing terrorism and backing al-Qaeda inspired guerrillas even now throughout the crisis-hit Syria. President Putin, when it came to Saudi Arabia, made his threat clear: " …Russia will defeat Saudis in Syria which became the epicenter of their [Saudis] malevolent plots. It is imperative for all Syrian parties that believe in a peaceful resolution for their country's five-year civil war to sit down at the negotiation table and denounce the Saudi destructive role," said President Putin. Did Hillary say the same? No.Putin even added that Russia will bomb Saudi Arabia back to the Stone Age life when nomad Arabs were in the habit of living in tents unless the regime gives up assisting radical terrorists in the Middle-East.We have gone wild off the rails regarding the Russian leader, blaming anything and everything on Vladimir Putin just as we did Saddam Hussein, Gaddafi, Egypt's Mubarak and now Bashar Al-Assad of Syria.The Communist Soviet Empire collapsed without a shot, spawning a much better Russia, while Hillary compared Putin to Hitler painting Russia as a country dying to attack Western Europe.I would ask: Hillary, why are you turning your back on the very people who mounted the greatest bloodless revolution in history to remove the Communist Soviet regime? Is Russia's democracy less advanced than Saudi Arabia, which we defend, while NATO expansion into Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic and NATO's Turkey expansion into Syria and Iraq should be acceptable to you?It should not be difficult to put Hillary in checkmate.Isn't it time to rid the U.S. from the mad policies of Bill Clinton, Joe Lieberman, William Cohen, Madeleine Albright, Sandy Berger and Trent Lott?Was it not Putin who was the first world leader to telephone US President George W. Bush after 911? And now that we know the folly of meddling in the Middle East we are still on the same course of destruction?Obama and Hillary's policies caused the death of a quarter million human beings and the displacement of millions more who flooded Europe and now you want to bring these into our nation? Did Putin do this in Crimea? Who is best to win the Hitler Award?Hillary is still honing after Syria's President Bashar al-Assad for purportedly crossing Obama’s whimsical “red line” claiming he used chemical weapons. This is an assertion that was never proven. Where is your proof Hillary? Was it not Russia that launched a formidable aerial attack against ISIS positions in Syria?We speak of the lack of democracy in Russia. But do we really have a democracy when majority Americans opposed genetically modified foods? Do we have a democracy when most Americans opposed same-sex marriage? Russia stood behind marriage and became a leading global supplier of healthy, organic and high-quality food and its ‘anti-gay’ legislation is in fact ‘pro-children’ and pro-marriage legislation. Yet you run ads about how much you care about children? Liar.And what does Hillary do? She accused, slandered and frothed saying that we, the American people, for not supporting such agendas are homophobic and more:“You can put half of Trump supporters into what I call the ‘basket of deplorables.’ Right? They’re racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic, you name it.… Now some of those folks, they are irredeemable, but thankfully they are not American.”Perhaps its time to re-open a can of worms for the Clintons that is least addressed. Trump can have the media do summersaults the day after if Trump addresses what the media failed to address before. And if history already recorded the disaster of Iraq, it will also record the disaster of Syria, especially when we dig deeper into Hillary's role to advance the Muslim Brotherhood, which is now infecting Syria in a gigantic way. Syria is the second hub for the Muslim Brotherhood after Egypt, which your administration nearly destroyed as well and now Trump meets Al-Sissi to fix what you messed up.When it comes to the Clintons, they remind me of the prophetic movie, the Siege. Densel Washington as Trump. I would be Tony Shalhoub in his role as the FBI Special Agent Frank Haddad. Hillary as the CIA officer Elise Kraft / Sharon Bridger. Trump should ask Hillary: at least we know who your husband's sexual partners were, but as for you, Hillary, the lights were so dim, how could you possibly know who you were screwing with?Have the New York Times a day after the debate even try to refute the secret 'love affairs' between Hillary and the Muslim Brotherhood.HILLARY'S FIRST M.B SECRET LOVERShoebat.com has produced evidence that reveal Hillary Clinton, while she was Secretary of State, had conspired to snuff out criticism of Islam. We collected numerous photos and meetings that were leaked from inside sources of one named Bassam Estwani. This would be the first 'Samir' in The Siege movie. An Imam of a mosque, where Anwar Al-Awalki used to speak, Estwani as it turned out, is one secret Muslim Brotherhood figure that had access to the Clinton White House.Estwani in White House with Bill Clinton.There was leaked exchange between Hillary's office regarding Estwani. While his membership in the Muslim Brotherhood can be found on Ikhwanwiki – a Muslim Brotherhood directory – the site has kept all the information on him out of public access.However, thanks to Arabic sources, Shoebat.com has obtained evidence of an alarming conspiracy – involving Estwani – to spread Islam in the U.S. military. Muhammad Ratib Al-Nablisi, one of the most prominent Muslim Theologians and Hamas supporters in the Levant (Syria) referenced Estwani's efforts in a 2001 progress report on the spread of Islam in America. In the report, al-Nablisi relayed the contents of his conversation with Estwani (translated):The first issue now in the world should be Islam. Islamic books are entirely absent in Europe and the U.S. However, I was told by my entrusted friend, Mr. Bassam Estwani two weeks ago. He told me that during the Gulf War they appointed an Islamic supervisor to guide twenty thousand American soldiers and officers in Washington to be a religious mentor for them in the army. But that the news is not good. There are several threats and the interests of Muslims are threatened in the world. But that the advocacy news is quite good. Allah wanted to show his religion. He wanted to push people to know Islam.Muhammad Ratib Al-Nablisi wearing Hamas scarf.Based on research done by Shoebat.com, it’s believed that the man, Estwani, was referring to could be Taha Jaber al-Alwani, a vehement anti-Semite, whom Huma Abedin referred to as key figure in using the Muslim Minority Affairs to invade the U.S. The other is Abdurahman Alamoudi, who founded the American Muslim Armed Forces and Veterans Affairs Council (AMAFVAC). Coincidentally, one of the leaked photos shows Alamoudi with Estwani and U.S. Congressman Jim Moran (D-VA)Alamoudi (top left), Rep. Jim Moran (center), and Estwani (right).As Shoebat.com has reported, Estwani serves on the board of the Syrian Emergency Task Force (SETF) which became a source of controversy last year when its Research Director – Elizabeth O’Bagy – was found to have a serious conflict of interest. Subsequently, as Shoebat.com reported, SETF didn’t handle the spotlight all that well. In addition to being funded by the U.S. State Department, the SETF also backed an anti-Semitic imam named Sheikh Ahmed Moaz al-Khatib to lead the Syrian rebels politically.Ahmed Moaz al-Khatib and Estwani, together in Cairo before fall of Mursi.The name of Estwani’s mosque is significant because the term “Dar al-Hijrah” represents one of two spheres in the Islamic world. It refers to a place designated for immigrants to Islam. The other sphere is “Dar al-Harab” which refers to a place where people are at war with Islam.In 2004, Al-Jazeera quoted Estwani as saying the following:“Dar Al-Hijra Center in Washington has played a prominent role and was remarkable to educate patrons on the importance and the need to participate in the elections for the selection of the fittest and the closest to the needs and values of the Muslim community ... The center of Dar al-Hijrah has good relations with some in Congress, whether Republicans or Democrats , and I have repeated visits to the center on several occasions , which was visited by the Republican candidate Tom Davis and he addressed the Muslim audience after Friday prayers that preceded the elections for the House of Representatives.”Clearly, the efforts of Estwani included endearing himself to both Republicans and Democrats. Here he is flanked by Republican Congressman Tom Davis he mentioned above and Democrat Moran:Rep. Tom Davis (L), Estwani, and Moran (R).The goals as revealed by Al-Jazeera are obvious:... To ensure the entry of Arab and Islamic figures and institutions in the U.S. decision making process in the U.S. Congress ... The establishment of the “Muslim lobby” through pressure groups which would have an impact on the U.S. presidential election and foreign policy orientations.In another shocking revelation, Estwani was quoted in an article published by Da’wa.net in which the topic was the rise in demand for pro-Islamic books in the U.S. after 9/11:One such case is the rise in demand for Islamic books in non-Muslim countries as result of 9/11. This alone is a big win that is clear to the people of Allah. Professor Bassam Estwani, owner of Dar Al-Quran and other publishing houses said that, “Hundreds of Islamic books were re-printed to meet the huge demand of Westerners to read these books…”If you’ve ever found yourself scratching your head at the disinterest of Republicans when it comes to the Muslim Brotherhood, consider that Estwani also met with the most powerful member of the House of Representatives at the time – Speaker Dennis Hastert. Hastert’s successor John Boehner has shown a propensity for either ignoring or helping the Brotherhood. He vehemently defended Abedin in the face of overwhelming evidence she’s connected to the Muslim Brotherhood. Senator Marco Rubio and Rep. Mike Rogers did as well. Boehner has also avoided appointing a select committee to look into Benghazi. John McCain’s passionate defense of the SETF and O’Bagy is another glaring example.Estwani meeting with then Republican Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert.As if anyone needed it, further proof that CAIR is a Muslim Brotherhood front group can be seen in photos of Estwani with the group’s Executive Director, Nihad Awad:Estwani with Nihad AwadAnd of course, who can forget Congress’s Gaza Queen Cynthia McKinney:Awad, Estwani, Rep. Cynthia McKinneyBassam Estwani was the Chairman of the Dar al-Hijrah mosque when then President Bill Clinton wrote him a personal note, as Shoebat.com previously reported. In that note, Clinton told Estwani that “all suggestions” Estwani had given to him – presumably in a letter Estwani presented to Clinton on March 9, 2000 – were ones that Clinton was “interested in” and that the President wanted to “follow-up”.At the beginning of the note, Clinton appears to be telling Estwani to check back with Mary Beth Cahill and Ben Johnson, two Clinton aids at the time. In subsequent days, in an email from Maureen T. Shea to Cahill and Johnson, Shea opens by explaining why she was writing:This places Estwani at no fewer than two events with President Clinton. The One America event at the White House Shea was referring to was for religious leaders.After providing the three suggestions from Estwani that Clinton was “interested in”, Shea asks if the suggestions will work. One suggestion was to combine all three religious events at the White House in December (deceitful practice of Muslim bridge-building). The second had to do with getting Clinton to visit the Dar al-Hijrah mosque. The third involved a one-on-one meeting between Estwani and Clinton, which Clinton said was “ok to do”.In another email by Shea a couple of weeks later, she gives a subordinate the parameters for a letter to Estwani in response to the suggestions he presented to Clinton:The verdict was in. Shea thought it a bad idea for Clinton to go to Dar al-Hijrah and a bad idea for a one-on-one meeting. This suggests that the hateful nature of the mosque – which would be home to Anwar al-Awlaki and visited by multiple 9/11 hijackers – was well known by the White House. That level of knowledge is not surprising. What is shocking is that Estwani would have as much access as he did. After all, the imam for Dar al-Hijrah from 1995-1999 was Mohammed al-Hanooti. In 1995, al-Hanooti had been named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.That’s right, the Chairman of the Dar al-Hijrah mosque, which was home to an individual implicated in the first World Trade Center attack, had access to President Clinton. That WTC attack occurred on Clinton’s watch. Another such co-conspirator is Siraj Wahhaj, who invited convicted terrorist Sheikh Omar Abdul Rahman (Blind Sheikh) to speak at his mosque several times. As Shoebat.com has reported, Wahhaj’s links to that attack continue to strengthen. Estwani has proudly posted a photo of him with Wahhaj (we don’t ever recall seeing Wahhaj so happy):Estwani (r) and Wahhaj (seated and smiling).So why was Hillary so involved with Muslim Brotherhood operatives? Hillary was steeped in the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) which had been pushing for criminalizing criticism of Islam for years, as far back as 1999. However, the objective of the OIC – to make illegal “defamation of religions” – needed a moderation makeover, which led to the “Istanbul Process”, kicked off officially in the city of its namesake, little more than one year prior to the Benghazi attacks. The agenda was intended to give a facelift to UN Resolution 16/18, which was adopted earlier that year by the Human Rights Council.July 15, 2011: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, OIC Secretary-General Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu, and Turkey Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu (L to R).Hillary Clinton attended and Co-chaired this event with then Secretary General of the OIC – Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu – and Foreign Minister Davutoğlu – on July 15, 2011, exactly five years to the day when Erdogan's Islamist major coup sparked in Istanbul, after defeating a minor coup.HILLARY'S SECOND M.B SECRET LOVERThe Clinton's nefarious dealings of close Mursi advisor Essam el-Haddad and his son (another Samir from the Siege) Gehad el-Haddad. Both were leaders in Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood apparatus and worked very closely together. Prior to working for the Mursi regime, Gehad worked for the Clinton Foundation for five years.Mursi and Bill at CGI on 9/25/12: How well do these men know each other?Screenshot from Gehad el-Haddad's LinkedInThe working relationship between Gehad and his father was close as well. Both men were politically active and were later arrested in their capacities as Muslim Brotherhood leaders.Gehad el-Haddad: Son of Essam, former Clinton employee.The Egyptian intelligence documents implicate the elder Haddad in dealings with the Sudanese branch of the Islamic Da'wa Organization (IDO), the same IDO that the President's brother Malik Obama has been linked to. And if these were sufficient in the Egyptian court, shouldn't they be sufficient to expose Hillary's connect to the Haddads?Circled portion refers to Essam el-Haddad.The evidence demonstrated that these Clinton sidekicks were Muslim Brotherhood agents engaged in shoddy and nefarious activities. The Washington Post can review all 42 pages from the Egyptian central intelligence docket, rife with references to Hillary's aids, Essam and Gehad el-Haddad, as well as several American officials and dignitaries working their way through unofficial backdoor channels, using bribery through Khairat Al-Shater, who was not even, and never became, an Egyptian government official. For example, this document talks of a request from the U.S. Embassy for then Ambassador to Egypt Anne Patterson to meet with Gehad el-Haddad and Khairat el-Shater:Ex. 20 and 21: Mursi trial Document naming former Clinton Foundation employee Gehad el-Haddad.As for the complaint against Mursi's wife Naglaa Mahmoud, it alleges that she collaborated with Hillary Clinton and planned to help lead domestic insurrections in Egypt after her husband was removed from power. Notwithstanding the validity of the complaint, what cannot be denied is that Saleha Abedin, the mother of Hillary's very close adviser Huma Abedin, is a close colleague of Naglaa. Together, both women constitute two of the 63 Muslim Sisterhood leaders first revealed by Shoebat.com.Shoebat.com reported on additional evidence introduced into Egyptian courts. One had to do with the dealings of Rep. David Dreier (R-CA) and the other surrounding a $750 million deal between Blumberg Grain and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.Both involved dealings with Gehad el-Haddad. What U.S. officials didn't realize is that Egyptian authorities carried out espionage missions against the Muslim Brotherhood to build a case against Mohammed Mursi. This involved major money laundering, bribery and illegal dealings regarding lucrative offers to the Muslim Brotherhood on behalf of members of the Obama administration.El-Shater, a man with whom Blumberg and members of Congress dealt, wasn't even a government official. Here is a link to the pages of evidence that pertain to this matter.March 17, 2013: Meeting between El-Shater, Gehad el-Haddad and American Businessman / Clinton friend Tim Collins (Exhibit 18)September 12, 2012: Meeting between U.S. Embassy and accused Khairat el-Shater to meet with U.S. diplomat BurnsTranslation: Exhibit 2, March 26-27, 2012 from U.S. Embassy requesting to meet el-Shater with team from U.S. Congress, led by Rep. David Dreier to discuss relations between two nations that U.S. admits Muslim Brotherhood the largest organized movement and the most influential in Egypt. To also discuss the Muslim Brotherhood's vision for Egypt. Essam el-Haddad (Ex 3) coordinating with el-Shater and with emissaries from EU for aid to be sent to Egypt and Int'l Bank. Ex 4, June 5, 2012: Meeting Khairat el-Shater, Essam Haddad, Gehad el-Haddad with EU emissary regarding financial aid to Egypt from EU and World Bank.Translation: Ex. 9, August 30, 2012: U.S. Embassy requests appt with accused Khairat el-Shater and Hassan Malik with American James Harmon (head of U.S. Projects) to discuss spending $60 Million (envelope B-9).Ex. 10, U.S. Embassy, September 1, 2012: U.S. Embassy requesting meeting with Khairat el-Shater and Gehad el-Haddad alongside Mike, assistant adviser for U.S. Nat'l Security for International commerce to discuss economic vision for new Egyptian Government.A letter to David Blumberg. Has been discussed on Shoebat.com in the past.Translation: Meeting at 1400 hours, dated May 12, 2013 with Khairat el-Shater and Makram Obeid regarding David Blumberg, an American who is a liaison with Muslim Brotherhood leadership, aided by Khairat el-Shater in which the American will secure for the Muslim Brotherhood a project for sea exports (hub) which links to Suez Canal, proposed by Muslim Brotherhood, which secures the interests of foreign nations, particularly, the U.S., Qatar, and Turkey. This hurts Egyptian national security.Translation: Ex. 28, a letter dated May 3, 2013 entitled, "Blumberg Grain-Egypt" sent by Khairat el-Shater from his email [email protected] sent to Gehad el-Haddad and Ashraf Siri, considered a letter coming from David Blumberg of Blumberg Capital to the accused Izz Nasser via email. The American says he obtained a letter from Ted Deutch. Democratic U.S. Congressman and Republican Mario Ballart. Sent to Egyptian ambassador, telling him that Congress has allocated aid and it is the group that supports $750 Million additional in aid... that el-Shater should consider a consolidated letter from Democrats and Republicans in Congress, not easy to obtain. See link for complete story.Translation: Accused Jihan Hamza, who's accused of working inside U.S. Embassy to coordinate communications involving 30-45 minute discussion dated 4/4/13 between el-Shater and the American (Lyle Brenard of U.S. treasury) to discuss aid to Egypt and to get views of el-Shater in that regard. This showed the court the extent of power given to el-Shater, despite his not working in the capacity of any government office, in accordance with traditional methods of dealings within a government during the reign of Mohammed Mursi.All this Al-Sissi of Egypt knows well and is why he wants a Trump victory. Both Trump and Al-Sissi know that with a Trump victory, at least we can say that 50% of Egyptians will look favorably towards the United States when it is currently 99% hate the U.S.HILLARY'S THIRD AND FAVORITE M.B SECRET LOVERWhen Estwani was visiting the White House, Hillary's other 'secret lover', another female version of 'Samir' is none other than #1, Huma Abedin – the daughter of a Muslim Sisterhood leader – had already been working for Hillary Clinton for four years. Shoebat.com revealed that Abedin’s brother was a fellow at the Oxford Center for Islamic Studies (OCIS) for several years when al-Qaradawi, the #1 Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader, served on the Board.While we admit, we did not find Huma Abedin's membership card to the Muslim Brotherhood, her family (father, mother, brother), took us a few months, but wasn't difficult if you are Shoebat stubborn. Trump should drop Weinergate and focus on Humagate. In government, relationships and family are a crucial part of any vetting. And if Hillary failed to vet Huma, at such a high position, how can she vet Muslim immigrants for that matter? How can she find out whether they want to use pressure cookers for chicken or for some other purpose like cooking Americans instead?The type of Islamist memberships one finds on Huma's family is the the same type of memberships one would find in Rafia Sultana Farook's collections. Rafia was the mother of the San Bernardino terrorist. In the top green line (photo above) is Rafia Farook's membership of the Muslim Brotherhood; "The Islamic Circle of North America Sisters wing" which sprouted from the radical Pakistani political group called Jamaat-e-Islami created by Abu A'la Maududi, in Pakistan (where Rahami last week's pressure cooker bomber visited), India and Bangladesh. The goal of this outfit, Jamaat-e-Islami, is to establish an Islamic state worldwide and who also worked closely with Huma and her family (the Abedins) in Saudi Arabia.The arm of this group is so extensive and operates worldwide. This system of recruiting Muslim women (the sisters) stems from the Muslim Brotherhood's plan to fulfill its mission for the Sisterhood, which was established as far back as 1933, headed by Lebiba Ahmad and expanded to the Indian subcontinent with Saleha Abedin (Huma's mother) was also member.Interestingly, Hillary's Muslim aid, Huma Abedin, and her parents, were also working with the same radical outfit Jamaat-e-Islami (just as Farook's mother, Rafia did) under its Prince: Maulana Muhammad Yousuf while living in Saudi Arabia.To even comprehend how extensive this movement is, read our translated research from reliable Arabic sources and see how far the "sisterhood" movement (which Huma's mother was member) expanded working with the Abedin family; father Syed Abedin, Brother Hassan Abedin and mother Saleha Mahmoud Abedin. The information in the link is loaded with photocopies of crucial documents, photos, U.N reports and all the links to show how interlinked the Abedins were with the international outfits of the Islamist movement.And just as Syed Farook's mother has a membership, so does Hillary's aid's mother. Huma Abedin's mother, Saleha Abedin (I kept a photocopy of her membership before they deleted it after they knew I was on her trail):Saleha Abedin, Membership in the Muslim World League (MWL) which the Logo in Arabic at top right clearly indicates. MWL’s financial arm, the defunct terror financing organization Rabita Trust, was initiated by former General Secretary of the MWL, notorious al-Qaeda godfather and an Abedin trusted partner and associate Abdullah Omar Naseef, who played an integral role in both al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood. He also had close ties with the most intriguing member of the Sisterhood (Saleha Abedin), the mother of Huma Abedin, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff. Though the MWL’s financial arm in the United States—Rabita Trust—was shut down for its terror ties, it still exists under the name Rabita al-Alam al-Islami; Saleha Abedin is a member of this organization, which makes her part of the MWL. The Anti Defamation League says the following about the MWL: “While the MWL has on several occasions condemned terrorism in general terms, it has a long history of providing financial support to terrorist groups or having organizational links to them, including to Hamas, Abu Sayyaf group, Moro Islamic Liberation Front, Jemaat al Islamiyya, and Al Qaeda.” This reality closely connects Saleha Abedin and Abdullah Omar Naseef as having been colleagues for decades without any degree of separation. Both are intimately involved with the MWL. According to September 11 Terror Litigation filed in the District of Colombia, Case # 1:02CV01616(JR): “274. On October 12, 2001, President George W. Bush’s Executive Order designated Defendant Rabita Trust as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist Entity and the Treasury Department froze its assets. Defendant Abdullah Omar Naseef founded the Defendant Rabita Trust in July 1988 and is currently its chairman. 275. Abdullah Omar Naseef ( or “Naseef”) also served as Secretary-General of the Muslim World League during the time he created Defendant Rabita Trust and has attempted to spread Muslim World League offices around the world. Part of his global efforts are found in his involvement in a SAAR Network charity”.Saleha Abedin with Hillary Clinton. The meeting was arranged by Huma Abedin at Dar Al-Hikma college in Saudi ArabiaHow much did Syed Farook’s mother, Rafia Farook know of her son and daughter in law’s planned terrorist plot? The answer would probably be that she knew as much as Saleha Mahmoud Abedin knew of her daughter Huma Abedin whom she worked extensively with.Syed Farook and Rafia are not far off from where Hillary Clinton's aid, Huma Abedin was also raised when her parents (the Abedins) went back and forth between the Indian subcontinent and Saudi Arabia.In Saudi Arabia, Huma’s parents worked with Jamaat-e-Islami, the very terror umbrella that produced Rafia, Tashfeen Malik, and Syed Farook, the son; terrorists who masterminded the San Bernardino massacre and most likely the recent Rahami, the chicken pressure cooker man.But Islamic Jihad is much bigger than the biggest American fear of terrorism; there is Muslim migration, Islamization and infiltration at the top level. During 1978, the conference for Muslim Minority Affairs directed by Huma's father Syed Zaynul Abedin met with Maulana Muhammad Yousuf (The Prince) of Jamaat-e-Islami, Pakistan branch ( محمد يوسف أمير الجماعة الإسلامية باكستان).The latter went as far back as 1927 when Maududi wrote a book called Jihad in Islam, in which he highlighted his view that the role of jihad was to fight to establish Islam as a political ideology and then use jihad to forcibly spread the ideology to the whole world to establish an Islamic State:‘Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth, which are opposed to the ideology and programme of Islam regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a state on the basis of its own ideology and programme, regardless of which nation assumes the role of the standard-bearer of Islam or the rule of which nation is undermined in the process of the establishment of an ideological Islamic State. Islam requires the earth — not just portion, but the whole planet’.But how can Islam rule "the earth"? The Abedins were the "experts" who provided Jamaat-e-Islami with the study and research on the demography of Muslim populations who can carry out such task and worked extensively at the Abdul Aziz University in Saudi Arabia where it was the main duty of the Abedins to spark the Muslim Minority Affairs program with a U.S. branch which Huma worked as the masthead at IMMA (Institute for Muslim Minority Affairs). The study was done in order to assess Muslim populations overseas and see how they can slowly immigrate into host nations to change the host nations through Da'wa (Islamic proselytization). Isn't this what we see happening today?The Abedin's contact, Yusuf (The Prince) came after Abu Al-Ala Maududi, who was key in the Tabligh in the Indian subcontinent. Maududi died in 1979 while the prince died last year in February in a Bangladesh jail.Maulana Muhammad Yousuf (The Prince) of Jamaat-e-Islami, Pakistan branch ( محمد يوسف أمير الجماعة الإسلامية باكستان)Maududi’s Islamic supremacy and Jamaat-e-Islami’s was involved in genocide against unarmed Bengalis in 1971 led the Bengali government to outlaw Maududi’s books in 2010.And if Al-Qaeda recruiter Anwar al-Awlaki spoke at an ICNA event in 2002, before he joined al-Qaeda and was dangerous as a terrorist, how much more danger could someone like Huma Abedin cause and leak the highest sensitive information?No, America does not understand the type of danger its in, and as Trump suggested, a serious assessment is necessary, not just from terror fronts, but from a policy point where Islamists must be stopped influencing policy from within, right at the top.I run into all sorts of naive Americans who will ask: how could Huma be an Islamist, she dresses western and married a Jew?America cannot comprehend, that while a Hijab could be a clue for a female terror mastermind, but the Islamist with a much bigger agenda, can look very western as commanded by Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi for the Sisterhood, in his instructions of how to apply Islamic Muruna and be allowed to violate Sharia law to be stealth.With Muruna, Huma Abedin, a practicing Muslim, is allowed to marry Jewish former Congressman Anthony Weiner even if he is now being investigated for pedophilia sexting to a minor.It becomes absolutely permissible in Islam where sanctioning prohibitions apply. In fact, it makes it even more suspicious that a Muslim woman like Huma with her extensive background in Islamic movements marry this pedophile Jew!It was al-Qaradawi, the spiritual head of the Muslim Brotherhood, who introduced Muruna to the American Muslim community in December of 1989 at the annual conference of the Association of Muslim Youth Forums. The Muslim Brotherhood leader introduced this tactic along with a 30-year plan (1990-2020) of conquest for Muslims in the U.S. It would include a tactic that would permit Islamic prohibitions:Muruna was designed to catapult and advance Sharia by using Western means. If one thinks that Sharia, with its harsh code, is problematic enough, how about the elimination of the kinder, gentler laws? Muruna is literally accomplished by permitting behavior normally so eschewed by Sharia that Westerners logically assume a more moderate version of Islam when such prohibitions are suddenly permitted. Westerners’ eyes are, in fact, deceiving them. Muruna is about going to great lengths to gain interests through a much deeper level of deception while simultaneously lowering the guard and gaining the support of the infidels.The consultations of the Abedin family did not only encompass Jamaat-e-Islami in the Indian subcontinent, but also in Saudi Arabia where Tashfeen Malik also lived while receiving her dose of Wahhabist ideology. Huma's involvement in The Muslim Minority Affairs program and the proof of membership can be seen in the link [here] which makes an ironclad case, she, her mother, brother and father were instrumental in sparking the movement in the U.S. and they all worked as a collective unit on this mission with the late King Fahd bin Abdul Aziz [here]. There, working with Jamaat-e-Islami, the plan was established by the team to flood the U.S. with Muslim minorities, which was clearly expressed in the Abedins' Institute for Muslim Minority Affairs—on whose Board Huma Abedin served for years.And if in doubt of what we say here, (click here) and use Google translate to read Huma’s father, “Sayed/Syed Zaynul Abedin” (his name as major contributor is on page 134) in the 143 page manifesto commissioned by the Muslim Wahhabists which stated: This snapshot in English says:“The Muslim societies in all continents of the world exist as either ‘Muslim Nation’ or ‘Muslim Minorities’. The assessment to determine what constitutes ‘state’ from a ‘minority state’ is done based on a number of measures. First the numbers scale, which is, if a nation has Muslims exceed half the population and its Constitution states that Islam is its official religion or that Islamic Sharia is its source of law, this state is then considered an Islamic state.” (p.29) “Since the number of Muslims has risen greatly in the last years where they became 1.3 billion Muslims. From these we have (900) million already in Muslim nations. The 400 million live as communities and as Muslim Minority” (p. 31) “… In Africa resides (250) million Muslims and in Europe resides (60) million Muslims and in North America and South America resides (10) million Muslims. So, according to these statistics it is expected that the number of Muslims will reach 2.6 billion six hundred thousand within a short span of time. The Muslims then will become a mighty and effective power in the world, of course, due to the increase in their numbers—then these will shift the demographic balance in their favor.” (p. 32).It actually maps out with statistics and demographic analysis every nation where Muslim minorities exist. Huma’s mother is an expert on demography and world populations and contributed greatly to that effect in the JMMA journal. Regardless how small the numbers, these are expected to advance Wahhabist ideology.The Abedin's contribution in the Wahhabist Manifesto pulls no punches. It mentions “puritan Islam” as directed by “Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab,” the father of Wahhabism:“Allah destined this region [Saudi Arabia] for a historic role. So He commissioned the two Imams—Muhammad bin Saud and Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab, may Allah have mercy upon them. But the times have passed on Imam Muhammad bin Saud by the emergence of the reformer—Muhammad bin AbdulWahhab. So the two Imams cooperated together to judge by what Allah brought forth, to fight against heresy and to bring Muslims back to puritan Islam.” (p. 8 )Indeed, all over it, it discusses accomplishments in ISNA, MSA, banking, centers and even names the mosques designated to fulfill the plan in the United States, except there are obstacles. The United States is the home of the main obstacle that hinders their agenda—the Jews. There the manifesto shifts, sounding more like an Arab version of Mein Kampf. Here I include the original snapshot from the document itself and translated it to English:“The greatest challenge that faces Muslims in the United States and Canada are the Jews who take advantage of their material ability and their media to distort the image of Islam and Muslims there by spreading their lies and distortions in the minds of the people in these countries. The Jews employ their efforts and direct their material wealth and their high positions to serve Zionist interests in the Arab region. They [the Jews] take advantage of situations to distort the image of Arabs and Muslims. The Zionist organizations spend enormous efforts to obstruct the spread of Islam in these areas.” (P. 79-80)The House of Al Saud had used Huma’s father Sayed Zaynul Abedin’s work Muslim Minorities in the West published in 1998 as part of 29 works to construct a plan to conquer the world with Wahhabi Islam (see P. 134) and “The Muslim Minority Affairs” in the west was a major discussion with the United States to be infiltrated with Islamists is mentioned throughout.We only showed 4 snapshots out of a whole 150 page manual. Page after page explained the Abedin's “Affairs”, not simply as a title, or as a religious or even a social activism, but as a Saudi foreign policy, a jurisprudence and commandment from the highest of authorities commissioned to the Saudi Ministry of Religious Affairs. It was an entire management system using “The Muslim Minority Affairs” as the main vehicle to bring in Muslim immigrants bringing victory against an infidel world by increasing the numbers of Muslims entering the U.S.It spoke of recruiting Muslims that live in non-Muslim lands and transforming them as a collective unit. It spoke of already established centers, educational programs, mosques and organizations in the United States like ISNA and MSA, all geared towards hindering any western plan for Muslim assimilation in a non-Muslim host nation. It mentioned “The Muslim Society of North America (ISNA) and the Muslim Students Association (MSA) [which Huma was member] established in the United States in 1962” (p. 65), as key agents to protect Muslims from assimilation.It named the mosques and centers in major United States cities established to carry out the mission. Five decades of efforts were spent with billions to ensure that Muslim refugees and immigrants will be an "unassimilated group" which then can infuence the non-Muslim host nation and other nations, regardless of how small the numbers of Muslims, by shifting the demographic scale due to their population growth in favor of this Saudi agenda.It explained how a gradual change would ensue by becoming a major revolutionary powerhouse that will tilt the host nation in favor of Muslims due to their increase as a population. It was a conundrum to transform a nation from within, where a Minority population can act as a ffth column, incubating in the host nation with the intent of gradually implementing the Wahhabist plans.Translating the manifesto was as if I was watching a science program on how a cell is invaded by a virus, where it gradually does its thing until the host cell fnally succumbs to the disease.The whole case of such infiltration takes a book which I documented in my book, The Case For Islamophobia.Trump is right. And when it comes to Trump's call to ban Muslims entering the U.S. until "we figure it all out," Abedin's Wahhabist Saudi Menifesto is the best reference to prove the case.The Abedins went back and forth from east to west, even working during 1978 with Maulana Muhammad Yousuf of Jamaat-e-Islami in India. Yusuf came after Abu Al-Ala Maududi, who was key in the Tabligh in the Indian subcontinent's equivalent of the Muslim Brotherhood. It has extensive ties to Wahhabists, including Al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups. They represent an extremist Salafst brand. Then they travel to Saudi Arabia working with an Al-Qaeda godfather, Naseef, who spearheaded IMMA and commissioned the Abedins from Saudi Arabia to launch the program in the U.S. and the United Kingdom.Do Americans think they circulated the earth, promoting this program solely by themselves? Were the Abedins fulflling an “American dream”, “representing our country and the democratic values that we hold dear” as President Obama says? Or is it that they are fulflling a Saudi Wahhabist fantasy that our silence is making a reality?What is ISNA’s Mohamed Magid, an entity in the Saudi manifesto, doing in the White House, sitting across the table from Huma Abedin who was an IMMA assistant editor, another entity created by the House of Saud?The Abedins' boss, Abdullah Omar Naseef, never faced American justice. Is oil more powerful than justice?Why does the State Department keep the masses in the dark, not wanting them to connect the dots between the Saudi Wahhabist plans and the Abedins’ IMMA and Sisterhood program?Only then, when they connect the dots, can they begin to unravel why the Abedin family works with nefarious characters like Naseef and Qaradawi. Only then can they understand how inter-linked these organizations are, their layers and sub- layers. IMMA was and is a family affair under Saudi management, a foreign entity that intends to do harm to United States interests.Only when Americans fnally wake up and ask politicians why it is taboo to discuss Huma Abedin, and demand the refutation of facts coupled with answers that are devoid of rhetoric. Only then will they support courageous candidates like Donald Trump. These are heroes, not slanderers as many imply. They represent the interests of the people and not the policy of silence. House Speaker John Boehner said to question Huma Abedin’s loyalty is “dangerous”; silence is more deadly. When Bin Laden was fnally given justice, no one was looking for jurisdictions. Yet, Al Saud and their henchmen still roam free, making sure America remains addicted to oil and constantly silent.Read Abedin's Mein Kampf:Abedins-Mein-Kampf and feast your eyes you sleeping American.Also read Huma Abedin's extensive ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. anonymous armageddon isis islam war Hillary Clinton Works With Three Major Islamic Terror Leaders Who Want To Kill Christians And Make America Into An Islamic Country, Donald Trump Must Bring This Up In The Debates To Crush Her By Walid Shoebat Bring up “Trump-Putin” relations in the debates next Monday and Trump should bring up Hillary's three secret ‘love... Read More...» Drunken Muslim Mob Storms Homes Of Random Christians And Severely Beats Them With Metal Rods While Cursing Jesus Christ 0 Islam is just a flash mob when it strikes. One minute these Christians were minding their own business, and the next minute these Muslims literally broke into their homes and were beating them with metal rods while cursing Jesus Christ:The inebriated men were reportedly being loud and obnoxious as they walked down the residential streets of Samundri. After a Christian woman asked them to quiet down and told them they were disturbing the peace in the neighborhood, they were enraged by "the audacity of 'ritually impure' Christians making demands on them," BPCA reports.The drunk Muslim men gathered up at least a dozen of their friends and grabbed sticks, metal rods and other assorted weapons and returned to attack the Christian residents.Upon returning to the neighborhood, the mob stormed the Christians' homes and indiscriminately beat them without regard for whether they were attacking men, women or children, according to BPCA.Not only did the Muslim mob physically and verbally assault Christians, they also insulted Jesus Christ, even though He is also a prophet in the Quran.Seven victims were injured in the attack, five of whom had to go to the hospital to receive treatment for their injuries.Among those injured are 48-year-old Arif Masih, 40-year-old Parveen Akhtar, 42-year-old Akram Masih, 50-year-old Jamaal Masih, 35-year-old Sharifaan Bibi, 34-year-old Shahzad Masih and 35-year-old Zahid Masih."I had returned from work and we were enjoying some rest as we waited for our food to be prepared. A group of drunk Muslims came and were shouting loudly and saying lewd things to any young girls that were passing," Arif Masih told BPCA officer Kanwal Amar, who visited with the victims in the hospital and at their homes to provide counseling and support."My wife asked them to leave the area as they were disturbing locals and they started shouting obscenities at us, but left shortly after," Masih continued. "About and hour later they returned with a gang of around 15 people and started beating us with sticks and poles. They said all Christians should be killed. They said we were evil demons and made Pakistan impure. I thought I and my family would be killed. It was very frightening." (source)The irony of this is how these Muslims were drunk while they were doing this. But, as we have pointed out, for every prohibition in Islam there is also a loophole. In this case, it is intention versus action.Basically, Islam says that for an act to be sinful, you (a) had to act sinfully and then (b) you had to actually do the act. So if these men were truly guilty of the sin of drinking alcohol, it would have to be proved that they first intended to get drunk, then they would actually have to get drunk. It does not matter if they tried to get drunk but failed, or if they did not intend to get drunk but succeeded. Both conditions have to be present. Even then, with both conditions, a sin committed by a Muslim only counts once against him. To the contrary, a good deed done with bad intentions counts even as one good deed, and a good deed done with good intentions counts as ten good deeds.If one combines this with the fact that these Muslims were attacking Christians, the infidel "enemies of Allah," then they can rest assured that their consciences are practically clean before Allah as the stain of drunkeness was washed away by the blood of the innocent people they beat for the "cause of Allah" and Mohammed.As for Jesus? Well, as far as they are concerned, it was not Mohammed.Now THOSE are twisted thoughts. anonymous armageddon isis islam war Drunken Muslim Mob Storms Homes Of Random Christians And Severely Beats Them With Metal Rods While Cursing Jesus Christ Islam is just a flash mob when it strikes. One minute these Christians were minding their own business, and the next minute these Musli... Read More...» Major Priest In The Catholic Church In Chicago Looks At Naked Children And Gets Sadistic Pleasure From It. Absolutely Evil People Are Trying To Take Over The Vatican 0 Octavio Munoz, false piece caught with child pornographyA major priest in the Catholic Church in Chicago was looking at naked children and got sadistic pleasure from this evil. There are some very evil people who have taken over the Vatican. Here is the report:A Chicago priest who was removed as pastor of a church in the Brighton Park neighborhood last year has been arrested on a child pornography charge.Octavio Munoz, 40, was removed from ministry by the Chicago Archdiocese in August 2015, because of concerns about materials found on his computer. At the time, the Archdiocese would not specify what was found.“Given the nature of the material, we reported our concerns to the civil authorities and will cooperate fully in their investigation,” the Archdiocese said in a statement last year.On Wednesday, police announced Munoz was found to be in possession of child pornography in July 2015.Munoz was arrested Tuesday in Maryland, and was brought back to Chicago and charged with one felony count of child pornography.He was due to appear for a bond hearing Wednesday afternoon.At the time Munoz was removed from ministry, he was pastor of St. Pancratius Church, at 40th and Sacramento.The archdiocese released the following statement Wednesday afternoon:“We learned today that Father Octavio Muñoz Capetillo has been charged with one felony count of possession of child pornography. The charge comes in connection with a police investigation that began after the archdiocese reported that inappropriate material had been found on a computer in his possession. On July 28, 2015, Archbishop Blase J. Cupich removed Father Muñoz from ministry and withdrew his faculties, his authority to minister, after the archdiocese learned that the inappropriate material might involve minors. Given the nature of that material, the archdiocese reported it promptly to the civil authorities and have cooperated fully with their investigation.”There are major homosexual rings in the Vatican, what I like to call "homosexual hornets nests." I myself have had experience with the homosexual infiltrators in the Catholic Church.While we were doing some work in Texas we were told of a man named Msgr. Michael Yarbrough (also known as Michael Yarborough), of Holy Trinity Catholic Church, and how he is a deviant priest who forcefully kissed a young man named Hector Escalante on the lips, and how he was supporting a pro homosexual group called Call to Action. Here is a photo of Msgr. Michael Yarbrough:Well, we decided that we were going to bait Msgr. Michael Yarbrough. I visited him in a confessional booth where I told him my age and apparently it registered an interest and he asked me if I wanted to come and hang out with him. He fell for the bait. I found it very odd that a priest of his high position, with a very busy schedule, would all of a sudden want to spend time with me.I accepted his offer, and gave him a call, and asked him if we would meet at a book store. He said that he preferred that we meet in his office. I found this quite disturbing because it was in his office where he kissed Hector Escalante. When I did research on Msgr. Michael Yarbrough, I found a 2002 report written in the San Antonio Express which stated:Hector Escalante complained that Monsignor Michael Yarbrough kissed him on the lips and groped him in his office in 1998 when Escalante was 27, on his last day on the job as a St. Matthew's Parish employee.Yarbrough admitted kissing him but said Escalante misunderstood the gesture, which the priest said was common among men in his family. He denied groping Escalante.Imagine, a man kissing another man on the lips as "common."I told Msgr. Michael Yarbrough that it would be better that we meet in a book store, to which he agreed. I asked him how much time he had, and he said, as long as I wanted. After doing some more research, I also found out that on top of kissing a young man on the lips, Msgr. Michael Yarbrough is a also a major donor to a pro homosexual group, called Call to Action, and I found his name on a list made by Call to Action designated as "major donors". I took a snapshot of the list with Msgr. Michael Yarbrough's name highlighted:So, we had the meeting at the bookstore, and after some conversation, I busted him on his heresies and his scandals, and also paid a visit to his church where I was eventually kicked out by his followers (who probably know nothing on how evil this heretic is). Here is the video:For years we have seen how the Vatican covers up for sexual predators and deviants, heretics and debased theologians. But we have never seen how the agents of the Vatican cover up for such evildoers in their private conversations. Well, Shoebat.com is now giving you this exclusive video showing you how the conniving is really done.I confronted Deacon Ron Walker, an official of the Vatican, asking why the Church has done nothing to punish Robert L. Kincl, a priest and canon law judge who was appointed by the Pope himself, who teaches that if two men masturbate each other they do not commit sin, and who himself defended confirmed child molester priest, Fr. Robert Hrdlicka. This is after Shoebat.com filed a complaint against Kincl after we caught him teaching us depravity.Deacon Ron Walker and the Bishop of Austin, Joe Vasquez, and Vicar General Daniel Garcia, did nothing to have Robert L. Kincl punished, even after they promised to take care of this evil. Shoebat.com realized that they were just patronizing us and so we made this video.Here is the video:Robert L. Kincl, who was appointed by the Pope, had befriended us as a fan of Shoebat.com acting as conservative, yet referred to homosexual fondling as permissible in the conversation. Having been shocked at his remarks, I told Kincl:How can you, as a priest, be so liberal toward such a sick evil as two men fondling each other, or as two men having a "relationship" just as long as they are not going with other men. It is evil and it is reprobate.I also told him:It is not tolerable for you, as both a priest and a canon law judge, to be permissive to somebody having a homosexual relationship just as long as they are not being promiscuous with other men. It is deplorable, and in the words of St. Paul, "worthy of death" (Romans 1:32).Kincl defended his position and responded with a rejection of the Old Testament and a twisting of St. Paul's condemnation of homosexuality in Romans, statingWe do not follow the Hebrew Scriptures. We follow Jesus Christ who never mentioned gay relationships. When St. Paul mentioned such a relationship he was referring to the promiscuousness of the Romans using sodomy.Shoebat.com decided to investigate Kincl and found that he has a dark past. In 1993, Kincl worked as a Commander in charge of clergy at the U.S. Navy, and while he was in the service he defended another chaplain confirmed to be guilty of child molestation, named Robert Hrdlicka.The investigation revealed that Robert L. Kincl had even written the authorities, not to charge the pedophile who molested the young boys, but urged them to send him back to serve as a chaplain:Catholic chaplain Lt. Robert Hrdlicka pleaded guilty to molesting boys in 1993. Before his sentencing, six other Catholic Navy chaplains and the church’s archbishop for the military services urged authorities to send Lt. Hrdlicka to a church-run treatment center.“It is my fervent hope and prayer that he will be able to return to the active ministry as soon as possible,” wrote then-Cmdr. Robert L. Kincl.Instead, Lt. Hrdlicka went to prison.Shoebat.com looked up Kincl's My Life page, to find out that after all these years Kincl is still friends with Hrdlicka the pedophile, since he is on his friends list, of which I took snapshots:Just as we have Muslims, like Bergdahl, who have infiltrated the military, we have people like Kincl who have infiltrated both the military and the Catholic Church, with their depravity.Kincl is now serving as a priest in Our Lady's Maronite Catholic Church alongside Msgr. Don Sawyer. When I confronted Sawyer on Kincl, Sawyer vehemently defended Kincl.Robert L. Kincl, depraved priest who defended a child molesting priestDon Sawyer, Msgr. at Our Lady's Maronite Catholic Church where Kincl servesShoebat.com decided to contact the Diocese of Austin to file a complaint, and spoke with the Very Reverend Daniel E. Garcia as the Vicar General for the Diocese of Austin, and Chancellor and Secretariat Director for Administration, Deacon Ron Walker, who were under Bishop Joe S. Vásquez of the Diocese of Austin.We asked them how could someone who supports homosexuality and defended a pedophile still be serving as a priest and not be excommunicated, to which Deacon Ron Walker, rolling his eyes, said that the Church's main objective would be to reconcile him with God, and not excommunicate him.It seems that the Diocese of Austin could care less if one of its priests supports homosexuality and defended a pedophile.Bishop Joe S. VásquezVicar General Danny Garcia of the Diocese of AustinWhy is this man serving as a priest when the Catholic Church, in its teachings, forbids homosexuality?It is not surprising to see how far reaching homosexuality has gone in the Vatican. What other deviancies will enter the Vatican in the next decade remains to be seen. Whatever happened to normal sin? In the good old days, steeling a chicken perhaps constituted such sin, but these days, its sleeping with it.Christianity is not about sycophancy, its about war against evil and the devil. We must arm ourselves to fight in this war.So many today, fattened by materialism and lost in their own ego, want nothing to do with the holy words of the prophet Moses, nor any of the prophets after him, nor the words of the Apostle who declared that sodomites are worthy of death, but continuously want to teach the precepts of a vain secular moralism. I am not speaking of the atheist who denies everything holy and whose blasphemies are expected; I am speaking of supposed “Christians” who carry the title of conservative and who tout themselves as advocates for family values, while at the same time exert themselves to please the sodomites and the acolytes of perversion as they try to censure those who honor the laws of God.I myself have dealt with this numerous times. I remember when I posted my video of me calling thirteen pro-homosexual and homosexual bakeries and asking them for a cake that says “Gay marriage is wrong,” and being denied service every time. The video went viral. Not too long after this happened, Janet Porter a well known conservative personality who I respect, contacted me asking if I would allow her to use clips of my video to add to her documentary exposing the homosexual agenda. I said it would be no problem. The documentary has been out for some time and has already had showings in select theaters in the United States.But then, the spirit of fear crept its way inside. Peter LaBarbera, an Evangelical who is in the documentary, was confronted by the leftist media on the fact he is in the same documentary with me, the man who believes in God’s law that says that sodomites are to be put to death. Instead of defending the law of the Bible, which he claims to believe, this hireling decided to push for me to recant my statements, and said that if I didn’t that I should be removed from the documentary. Janet called me urging me to make a statement to “clarify” what I really believed, that I really don’t believe in the death penalty for sodomites, but simply in the anti-sodomy laws that were once enacted in Texas.To be honest I was quite hesitant to do this because to do so would mean recanting all of my writings in support for the death penalty. Janet sent me the first draft of the statement to receive my stamp of approval. The draft stated:“While I have had homosexual activists call for my death and beheading, etc., I have not called for anyone to take the life of those practicing homosexual behavior. I do want the laws of the United States to once again make sodomy illegal as they did prior to the 2003 Lawrence v. Texas ruling because such practice is not only immoral, but physically dangerous, as well.”But Peter LaBarbera objected to the draft and expressed his dissatisfaction with it, pushing for me to recant my position that an inquisition should be established to uproot homosexuality and other perversities. Peter LaBarbera responded to the draft with this email to Janet:“Not good enough, if he called for an "Inquisition" against homosexuals. We need to look at the exact comments and craft a statement based on those. I do not have time to do that today or tomorrow as I'm driving to DC. We need transcripts of the exact comments and then he needs to disavow that approach (or clarify what he meant). Otherwise people will keep asking about those specific comments.”Peter Labarbera, more afraid of the sodomites than the law of GodAll of these words are filled with fear. LaBarbera is afraid of negative attention from the leftist media. Such behavior is contrary to God, Who is Love, “because perfect love expels all fear.” (1 John 4:18) Why should a Christian be afraid or ashamed of the law of God which states that “If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death” (Leviticus 20:13)? Why should a Christian be ashamed of the words of the Apostle when he said that homosexuals do things that “are worthy of death” (Romans 1:32)? They will say that such words are against love. But how could a Christian use such argumentation when St. Paul himself says that “the purpose of the commandment is love” (1 Timothy 1:5), and in the same epistle goes on to say that “we know that the law is good if one uses it lawfully, knowing this: that the law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless and insubordinate, for the ungodly and for sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, for fornicators, for sodomites” (1 Timothy 1:8-10)?In Christianity, love and justice and indistinguishable, for all virtues, be it justice, charity or endurance, are in love, for God is Love, and in God is all virtue. So how could such Christians say that I am against love, when the purpose of the law is love, and this very law declares that sodomites are worthy of death?Peter LaBarbera was blocked from entering Canada, and he goes before the media showing how persecuted he is, but yet he wants to block me — a Christian — from being in a documentary for being more politically incorrect than him. And at the same time, he kisses the feet of the sodomite to deny me as Peter denied Christ. A filthy sodomite who calls himself “Joe My God”, began to attack LaBarbera for being in the documentary with me. Peter LaBarbera quickly went on Twitter to appease the sodomite, even going to far as to address him with the blasphemous title of “Joe My God”:Why would a Christian address an evil person with such a blasphemous title as "Joe My God"? It is truly pathetic how these modern Christians get on their hands and knees for these useless sodomites. The sodomites make up such a small part of the population, and yet the Christians, who are supposedly the majority, are terrified of them. Caesar wanted the whole world to address him as kyrios, or lord. And yet you never see any of the early Christians ever address Caesar as kyrios. In fact, St. Paul went directly against this idea when he said "that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord" (Philippians 2:11), that is that Christ is Kyrios. Yet this Peter LaBarbera wants to do an inquisition on me, firmly saying "We need to look at the exact comments" and "We need transcripts of the exact comments and then he [Theodore Shoebat] needs to disavow that approach", while at the same time he runs to some sodomite to get his approval. What an absolutely pathetic person. Peter LaBarbera does not want to respect God, but rather "Joe My God".This is why the Christians keep losing ground and the sodomites keep gaining ground. Instead of using the attention that controversy brings, Christians run away from controversy. This is why Christendom is drowning.Another example of this demonic infiltration is Michael Coren, a heretic who lied about being Catholic while holding a position as a news host in Canada. He wrote numerous books about how great Catholicism is, and while praising the Catholic faith, he was attending Anglican church services. Now he has declared his renunciation of the Catholic faith, and has become an open agent for the sodomite religion. He expressed his leaving the Catholic Church by saying, “I could not remain in a church that effectively excluded gay people,” and also saying “I felt a hypocrite being part of a church that described homosexual relations as being disordered and sinful. I just couldn’t be part of it anymore.”So Michael Coren has become an ambassador for the sodomites. Michael Coren is also a betraying, superficial effeminate. He denied me and turned his back on me as he cowered in the presence of two Muslims on Canadian television, when they berated him for referencing our website, shoebat.com. Here is the video:Michael Coren, false Christian, cowered before Muslims, agent of homosexuality and acolyte of the Antichrist.If Michael Coren will betray me for saying that pagan Muslim Albanians need annihilation, then he most certainly will betray Moses for slaughtering the calf worshippers; he most certainly will betray Joshua for exterminating the Canaanites; he most certainly will betray Jehu and Elijah for killing the priests of Baal; and he most definitely has betrayed God Himself, for God ordered the extermination of the wicked.I wrote an email to Michael Coren, telling him:I saw your debate with Shabir Ali and the other Muslim. I have always considered you an ally, and still do. But I must tell you one thing: The cock crowed three times, and you denied me thrice.Michael Coren responded to me fearfully, like a shaking dog, saying:I think we should speak. Is there a number I can call you on later today? Please hear my side before you condemn me. Michael.I heard his side of the story on the phone and left it at that. I had no intentions at that point to make any actions against him. But after seeing how he is now advancing the sodomite religion and going against Christianity, realizing that his appeal meant nothing, now I must respond to him and confront him for the heretic he is. He is a heretic and the worst kind. There is one heretic that says: "I am a heretic. I hate God." But there is the other type, the more deceptive strand that says, "I love God. I am orthodox. But lets tolerate the enemies of God, lets enable them, empower them, allow them to eclipse the light their darkness." This is the worst type of heretic and the most dangerous kind.There are many of these types, who promote the evil, while at the same time calling themselves Catholic.One of these, is Robert Spencer. Recently, Spencer wrote against me for simply exposing the sodomites and their defenders within the “counter-jihad” movement, and for maintaining the prescription of death upon sodomites and those who approve of them and their evils. While it takes one fool to write short articles at the strike of a pen, it takes the wise to write triple to refute it. I will quote Spencer, extensively:In a video posted last Thursday, Theodore Shoebat says: “Pamela Geller is worthy of death.” Her crime? Appearing at a “Gays for Trump” event along with gay activist Milo Yiannopoulos at the Republican National Convention in July. For that, says the learned Shoebat the younger, “In Biblical law, in the government of Christendom, she is worthy of death.”Is that so? Yes, says Theodore, because Romans 1:32 speaks of those who “having known the justice of God, did not understand that they who do such things, are worthy of death, and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them.” Pamela Geller is not homosexual, you see, but by appearing at the event, she gave “consent” to those who are, and thus she also is “worthy of death.”Theodore Shoebat doesn’t mention that this passage refers not only to men who “have burned in their lusts one towards another,” but also to those who are guilty of “iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness,” and are “full of envy, murder, contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers,” as well as “detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,” and those who are “foolish, dissolute, without affection, without fidelity, without mercy” (Romans 1:26-31). All of these people are, in the Apostle Paul’s view, “worthy of death.”Why, then, do we not see Christians (or at least Christians outside of hysterical Hollywood fantasies) committing mass murder, bent on killing everyone who is envious, haughty, and disobedient to his parents? Because Paul’s saying that these people are “worthy of death” is not a call for mass executions and a reign of terror, but part of his argument that all people have sinned and are in need of the divine mercy.In today’s overheated and jihad-preoccupied environment, however, Theodore Shoebat’s charge that Pamela Geller is worthy of death is not theological musing, but arguable incitement to murder.”Robert is both, deceptively twisting my words, and insinuating that I am calling for someone to murder that lunatic wretch, Pamela Geller, and to carry out vigilantism. If Spencer watched the whole video that I did, which he quotes, he would have known that Geller was taking part in an event that has pederastic images of boys, that promotes homosexuality, that advances and inculcates the very evils that God absolutely hates and sees as worthy of destruction.Geller also spoke with a sodomite named Milo, someone who teaches that sodomites are born inheriting genetics that give them higher IQs. This is absolutely akin to Nazism, and for Geller — a Jew — to be associating herself with some of a supremacist ideology, like that of the Nazis and the Social Darwinists -- claiming the idea of superior genetics -- is both evil and diabolical. And yet, I am the bad guy? I never asked anyone to murder Geller. What I said was that in the context of Christendom, heretics like Geller would be put to death, and rightfully so.Also, as we know based on the elucidations of St. John Chrysostom, St. Paul was indeed directing his words towards judges to punish the evildoers, and we also know that it is obvious, based on a full reading of Romans 1, that Paul describes homosexuals, as opposed to merely listing homosexuality as a sin amongst sins.Spencer goes on to say, “Theodore’s words demonstrate that old habits and mindsets die hard and aren’t always effaced by a change of creed”, thereby implying that I am still Islamic in my beliefs. Amazingly, this is coming from a person who does not see himself as judgmental. How does this person know from where I determined my beliefs on this issue? If he would have asked me, I would have shown him. He knows nothing about my intellectual evolution. He does not know that my affirmations were cultivated from reading, firstly, the Scriptures, and then amplified from the fathers and the ancient scholars, like Firmicus, Cyprian, Augustine, Aquinas, Bellarmine, Chrysostom, Ambrose, Vitoria, St. Bernard, St. Bernardino of Siena, and others. Were all of these men jihadists?Tell us, Mr. Spencer, was Augustine a jihadist when he wrote:“Sins against nature, therefore, like the sin of Sodom, are abominable and deserve punishment whenever and wherever they are committed. If all nations committed them, all alike would be held guilty of the same charge in God’s law, for our Maker did not prescribe that we should use each other in this way. In fact, the relationship that we ought to have with God is itself violated when our nature, of which He is Author, is desecrated by perverted lust.” Tell us, was Augustine a jihadist when he wrote that"When God commands a thing to be done against the customs or agreement of any people, though it were never done by them heretofore, it is to be done"; and when he wrote afterwards: "For as among the powers of human society, the greater authority is obeyed in preference to the lesser, so must God in preference to all." (Confess. iii, 8)Tell us, was Augustine a jihadist when he wrote:"A sovereign serves God one way as man, another way as king; he serves Him as man by living according to the faith, he serves Him as king by exerting the necessary strength to sanction laws which command goodness and prohibit the opposite." (Augustine, letter 185, ch. 19)Tell us, was Augustine a jihadist when he wrote in praise of King Hezekiah and Nebuchadnezzar (who was not even a believer) when they enacted edicts against blasphemy and perversity? Was he a jihadist when he wrote:"It was thus that Ezechias [Hezekiah] served Him [God] by destroying the groves and temples of idols and the high places which had been set up contrary to the commandments of God; thus Josias served Him by performing similar acts [see 2 Kings 23:1-25]; thus the king of the Ninevites served Him by compelling the whole city to appease the Lord; thus Darius served Him by giving Daniel power to break the idol, and by feeding his enemies to the lions; thus Nabuchodnosor, of whom we spoke above, served Him when he restrained all his subjects from blaspheming God by a terrible penalty." (Augustine, letter 185, ch. 19, brackets mine) St. AugustineTell us, was King Josiah a jihadist when “he brake down the houses of the sodomites, that were by the house of the Lord, where the women wove hangings for the grove” (1 Kings 23:7)? Tell us, was St. Thomas Aquinas a jihadist when he wrote:“it is lawful to kill an evildoer in so far as it is directed to the welfare of the whole community, so that it belongs to him alone who has charge of the community's welfare. Thus it belongs to a physician to cut off a decayed limb, when he has been entrusted with the care of the health of the whole body. Now the care of the common good is entrusted to persons of rank having public authority: wherefore they alone, and not private individuals, can lawfully put evildoers to death.”Tell us, was Aquinas a jihadist when he prescribed that “heretics, as soon as they are convicted of heresy, to be not only excommunicated but even put to death." (Aquinas, St. Thomas Aquinas: Whether Heretics Should Be Tolerated, II-II, Q. 11, Art. 3, in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority in Medieval Europe, ch. v, p. 182)St. Thomas AquinasThe Manichaeans promoted homosexuality and cross-dressing, and even devised their own rite in which their followers would eat a false eucharist with male semen on it. Tell us, Spencer, was the Emperor Zeno a jihadist when he decreed:“We ordain that persons who prefer the Manichaeans’ deadly error should have no freedom or leave to dwell in any place whatever of our state; but that, if ever they should have appeared or should have been found, they should be subject to capital punishment.” (Law of Zeno, or Anastasius I, from the year 487 or 510)Tell us, were the authors of the Apostolic Constitutions jihadists when they affirmed the Mosaic Law against homosexuality and beastiality:And fornication is the destruction of one’s own flesh, not being made use of for the procreation of children, but entirely for the sake of pleasure, which is a mark of incontinency, and not a sign of virtue. All these things are forbidden by the laws; for thus say the oracles: “Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind.” “For such a one is accursed, and ye shall stone them with stones: they have wrought abomination.” “Every one that lieth with a beast, slay ye him: he has wrought wickedness in his people.” “And if any one defile a married woman, slay ye them both: they have wrought wickedness; they are guilty; let them die.”Tell us, was St. Jerome a jihadist when he wrote: "To punish murderers and impious men is not shedding blood, but applying the laws." (St. Jerome, Commentary on Jeremiah, in Bellarmine, On Secular People or Laymen, ch. 13, ed. Tutino, p. 50)St. JeromeTell us, was Pope Pius XII, a very recent pope, a jihadist when he wrote, "that which does not correspond to truth or to the norm of morality objectively has no right to exist, to be spread or to be activated." (As quoted by Lefebvre, Religious Liberty Questioned, part 1, p. 14)Tell us, was Moses a jihadist when he had three thousand Jews slaughtered for worshipping the golden calf? In 1550, a Franciscan friar from Brescia, named Calgano, was arrested for having a sodomomatical relationship with a boy, and for teaching that Jesus had a homosexual relationship with St. John. This blasphemer was put to death, without question. This is the Christendom that I love, the Christendom that I want back. But it was put to sleep, and is being kept asleep by heretics like Spencer, who does not want to see the holy laws against perverted heresies enacted. Spencer, in fact, says:“I don’t believe in Islam and don’t wish to live under a government that forces me to conform to its sensibilities; nor do I wish to live under a Christian government that forces non-Christians to conform to its sensibilities.”So Spencer is okay with sodomites roaming the streets, indulging in their evils, inundating society? Is he okay with Geller speaking in a room with disgusting images, with sodomites who demand for the toleration of homosexuality, a practice worthy of death?Essentially, Spencer’s mentality would have us call Moses, King Josiah, Joshua, Hezekiah, and all of the holy men of Christianity who struck and killed evildoers, jihadists. Spencer’s perspective is essentially anti-Christian. It is of the Christian Faith to have governments destroy and uproot evil and perversity. As Augustine said, "they are called Catholic Christians, not servers of idols like your Julian [the pagan emperor]; not heretics, as certain ones have been and have persecuted the Church, when true Christians have suffered the most glorious martyrdom for Catholic truth, not justly deserved penalties for heretical error." *Augustine, letter 105, brackets mine* St. Isidore said that law "is composed of no private advantage, but for the common benefit of the citizens." *Isidore, Etymologiae, 5.21, in Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, Ia IIae 90, article 2*Do you hear that Spencer? Law is for the public benefit, that does not mean the toleration of sodomites, or the freedom given to sodomotical practices. You will then say, “This is America!” Really? Lets look at the laws that were once in the law books, before heretics like yourself let the sodomites take over. Here is a law from New York, 1787:Here is a law from 1796, from Connecticut: Mr. Spencer, were the Americans who established these laws, jihadists? It seems that anyone who wishes to support the divine law against homosexuality is deemed as a “jihadist” or “like ISIS.” This is a manifestation of the Hegelian Dialectic, or controlled opposition. Point to a real threat, and then paint your enemies as being a part of that threat. It used to be that one would call a conservative, “a nazi,” but now they are calling Christians “jihadists” or “Muslims.” Its quite disgusting and low class, but what do you expect from a bunch of people who bow down to the homosexual god every time the sodomite elites want people to conform when they complain of true Christians? Orthodox Christians maintain the holy laws, the elite sodomites complain, and to their remonstrances the conservatives who want to be accepted will get on their hands and knees for the god of Sodom.Spencer begins his article with, “These are times that try men’s souls”, truly they are, and I see what has happened after your soul has been tried, Mr. Spencer: you bow down to the sodomites, and a tart named Pamela has you on her fingertip. anonymous armageddon isis islam war Major Priest In The Catholic Church In Chicago Looks At Naked Children And Gets Sadistic Pleasure From It. Absolutely Evil People Are Trying To Take Over The Vatican Octavio Munoz, false piece caught with child pornography A major priest in the Catholic Church in Chicago was looking at naked children... Read More...» Mexican Drug Cartel Kidnaps Christian Pastors, Ties Them Up With Ropes And Slaughters All Of Them 0 Mexican drug cartel commandos kidnapped to Catholic priests, tied them up and slaughtered both of them. Here is the report:Two priests kidnapped this morning from a church in Poza Rica, Veracruz, were executed following their abduction.Alejo Nabor Jiménez and José Alfredo Juárez de la Cruz were snatched by armed commandos from Nuestra Señora de Fátima Catholic church, triggering a search operation by state police and the Mexican Army.Their bodies were found at one o’clock this afternoon near the Papantla-Poza Rica highway at a place known as Devil’s Curve in the municipality of Papantla.Their hands and feet had been bound and they had been shot several times with high-caliber rifles.A third man, a church official, was also kidnapped but was located alive but bruised after he reportedly escaped.A report earlier this year said 40 Catholic priests were murdered in Mexico in the last 10 years. The Catholic Multimedia Center (CCM) said crimes against priests soared during the Felipe Calderón administration, when 25 lost their lives.Fifteen had been killed in the first three years of President Enrique Peña Nieto’s term, and two were missing, the report said.An analysis in February by InSight Crime, a crime research organization, suggested that priests who teach messages of social justice and peace are likely to become direct targets of organized crime gangs.A priest at CCM said an activist role can put them on the front line. “They defend migrants, they’re against drug trafficking,” said Omar Sotelo. “And they often know who the criminals are, having seen them grow up in the towns.”Some will therefore see the priests as a threat, he said.Mexico is, right now, in a state of despotism more severe than that of the Calles regime, against which Catholics fought in the Cristero War. Mexico is the most dangerous nation on the Western Hemisphere to be a Catholic priest. The narcos are all devil worshippers and occultists, they hate the Catholic Faith and want to utterly uproot it, for they cannot fully take over Mexico spiritually and culturally unless they destroy the biggest obstacle, and that is the Church. I did a whole documentary on this subject, and I encourage you to watch it and to tell as many people about it as possible: anonymous armageddon isis islam war Mexican Drug Cartel Kidnaps Christian Pastors, Ties Them Up With Ropes And Slaughters All Of Them Mexican drug cartel commandos kidnapped to Catholic priests, tied them up and slaughtered both of them. Here is the report: Two priests... Read More...» ISIS Arrests Elderly Muslim Imam After He Has Dream Prophesying Their Destruction 0 In a panicked, desperate bid to hold on to their power as it slips away through their fingers like grains of sand, ISIS arrested an elderly Muslim man after they found out he had a dream prophesying the destruction of ISIS:The Islamic State terrorist organization has reportedly abducted a 70-year-old prayer leader because he said he had dream about the barbaric militant group's downfall in its largest stronghold in Iraq, the city of Mosul.According to local sources who spoke with the Iranian-based AhlulBayt News Agency, militants captured the elderly man, who was a prayer leader at a mosque in Mosul, after he claimed that he was given a prophecy in a dream about the demise of IS' control of the city.As IS continues to suffer from declining oil revenues and U.S. President Obama and Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi vowed on Monday to launch an offensive to recapture Iraq's second largest city within months, the militant group's leaders have barred Mosul residents talking about military successes against IS.The local sources say IS leaders heard about the man's dream after the news of it had spread around the city. The jihadis subsequently raided the man's home in the Tahrir district of Mosul and detained him.It is unclear as to what kind of punishment IS leaders have planned for the elderly man, but the militant group has heinously punished people in the past for simply talking about the advances of the Iraqi military.(source)Prophesy is not to be taken lightly. Likewise, it also includes people who are non-Christians. This is because, if God truly is love and man is truly made in the image and likeness of God, then God's love extends to all people, and He will speak to them in their particular situations and lead them to the truth. It has happened before, and it will again.It was inevitable that ISIS would fall eventually, as Islam is an evil religion and ISIS practices the evil which Islam preaches. How interesting it is that ISIS would be so desperate to hold on to its power that it would attempt to destroy a simple message this old man has.ISIS knows what it is doing is evil, and its time is running out.Mene, mene, tekel, upharsin. Enjoy what time you have left- the writing is on the wall.Balshazzar's Feast by Rembrant anonymous armageddon isis islam war ISIS Arrests Elderly Muslim Imam After He Has Dream Prophesying Their Destruction In a panicked, desperate bid to hold on to their power as it slips away through their fingers like grains of sand, ISIS arrested an eld... Read More...» Newer Posts Older Posts Home Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
Drunken Muslim Mob Storms Homes Of Random Christians And Severely Beats Them With Metal Rods While Cursing Jesus Christ 0 Islam is just a flash mob when it strikes. One minute these Christians were minding their own business, and the next minute these Muslims literally broke into their homes and were beating them with metal rods while cursing Jesus Christ:The inebriated men were reportedly being loud and obnoxious as they walked down the residential streets of Samundri. After a Christian woman asked them to quiet down and told them they were disturbing the peace in the neighborhood, they were enraged by "the audacity of 'ritually impure' Christians making demands on them," BPCA reports.The drunk Muslim men gathered up at least a dozen of their friends and grabbed sticks, metal rods and other assorted weapons and returned to attack the Christian residents.Upon returning to the neighborhood, the mob stormed the Christians' homes and indiscriminately beat them without regard for whether they were attacking men, women or children, according to BPCA.Not only did the Muslim mob physically and verbally assault Christians, they also insulted Jesus Christ, even though He is also a prophet in the Quran.Seven victims were injured in the attack, five of whom had to go to the hospital to receive treatment for their injuries.Among those injured are 48-year-old Arif Masih, 40-year-old Parveen Akhtar, 42-year-old Akram Masih, 50-year-old Jamaal Masih, 35-year-old Sharifaan Bibi, 34-year-old Shahzad Masih and 35-year-old Zahid Masih."I had returned from work and we were enjoying some rest as we waited for our food to be prepared. A group of drunk Muslims came and were shouting loudly and saying lewd things to any young girls that were passing," Arif Masih told BPCA officer Kanwal Amar, who visited with the victims in the hospital and at their homes to provide counseling and support."My wife asked them to leave the area as they were disturbing locals and they started shouting obscenities at us, but left shortly after," Masih continued. "About and hour later they returned with a gang of around 15 people and started beating us with sticks and poles. They said all Christians should be killed. They said we were evil demons and made Pakistan impure. I thought I and my family would be killed. It was very frightening." (source)The irony of this is how these Muslims were drunk while they were doing this. But, as we have pointed out, for every prohibition in Islam there is also a loophole. In this case, it is intention versus action.Basically, Islam says that for an act to be sinful, you (a) had to act sinfully and then (b) you had to actually do the act. So if these men were truly guilty of the sin of drinking alcohol, it would have to be proved that they first intended to get drunk, then they would actually have to get drunk. It does not matter if they tried to get drunk but failed, or if they did not intend to get drunk but succeeded. Both conditions have to be present. Even then, with both conditions, a sin committed by a Muslim only counts once against him. To the contrary, a good deed done with bad intentions counts even as one good deed, and a good deed done with good intentions counts as ten good deeds.If one combines this with the fact that these Muslims were attacking Christians, the infidel "enemies of Allah," then they can rest assured that their consciences are practically clean before Allah as the stain of drunkeness was washed away by the blood of the innocent people they beat for the "cause of Allah" and Mohammed.As for Jesus? Well, as far as they are concerned, it was not Mohammed.Now THOSE are twisted thoughts. anonymous armageddon isis islam war Drunken Muslim Mob Storms Homes Of Random Christians And Severely Beats Them With Metal Rods While Cursing Jesus Christ Islam is just a flash mob when it strikes. One minute these Christians were minding their own business, and the next minute these Musli... Read More...»
Major Priest In The Catholic Church In Chicago Looks At Naked Children And Gets Sadistic Pleasure From It. Absolutely Evil People Are Trying To Take Over The Vatican 0 Octavio Munoz, false piece caught with child pornographyA major priest in the Catholic Church in Chicago was looking at naked children and got sadistic pleasure from this evil. There are some very evil people who have taken over the Vatican. Here is the report:A Chicago priest who was removed as pastor of a church in the Brighton Park neighborhood last year has been arrested on a child pornography charge.Octavio Munoz, 40, was removed from ministry by the Chicago Archdiocese in August 2015, because of concerns about materials found on his computer. At the time, the Archdiocese would not specify what was found.“Given the nature of the material, we reported our concerns to the civil authorities and will cooperate fully in their investigation,” the Archdiocese said in a statement last year.On Wednesday, police announced Munoz was found to be in possession of child pornography in July 2015.Munoz was arrested Tuesday in Maryland, and was brought back to Chicago and charged with one felony count of child pornography.He was due to appear for a bond hearing Wednesday afternoon.At the time Munoz was removed from ministry, he was pastor of St. Pancratius Church, at 40th and Sacramento.The archdiocese released the following statement Wednesday afternoon:“We learned today that Father Octavio Muñoz Capetillo has been charged with one felony count of possession of child pornography. The charge comes in connection with a police investigation that began after the archdiocese reported that inappropriate material had been found on a computer in his possession. On July 28, 2015, Archbishop Blase J. Cupich removed Father Muñoz from ministry and withdrew his faculties, his authority to minister, after the archdiocese learned that the inappropriate material might involve minors. Given the nature of that material, the archdiocese reported it promptly to the civil authorities and have cooperated fully with their investigation.”There are major homosexual rings in the Vatican, what I like to call "homosexual hornets nests." I myself have had experience with the homosexual infiltrators in the Catholic Church.While we were doing some work in Texas we were told of a man named Msgr. Michael Yarbrough (also known as Michael Yarborough), of Holy Trinity Catholic Church, and how he is a deviant priest who forcefully kissed a young man named Hector Escalante on the lips, and how he was supporting a pro homosexual group called Call to Action. Here is a photo of Msgr. Michael Yarbrough:Well, we decided that we were going to bait Msgr. Michael Yarbrough. I visited him in a confessional booth where I told him my age and apparently it registered an interest and he asked me if I wanted to come and hang out with him. He fell for the bait. I found it very odd that a priest of his high position, with a very busy schedule, would all of a sudden want to spend time with me.I accepted his offer, and gave him a call, and asked him if we would meet at a book store. He said that he preferred that we meet in his office. I found this quite disturbing because it was in his office where he kissed Hector Escalante. When I did research on Msgr. Michael Yarbrough, I found a 2002 report written in the San Antonio Express which stated:Hector Escalante complained that Monsignor Michael Yarbrough kissed him on the lips and groped him in his office in 1998 when Escalante was 27, on his last day on the job as a St. Matthew's Parish employee.Yarbrough admitted kissing him but said Escalante misunderstood the gesture, which the priest said was common among men in his family. He denied groping Escalante.Imagine, a man kissing another man on the lips as "common."I told Msgr. Michael Yarbrough that it would be better that we meet in a book store, to which he agreed. I asked him how much time he had, and he said, as long as I wanted. After doing some more research, I also found out that on top of kissing a young man on the lips, Msgr. Michael Yarbrough is a also a major donor to a pro homosexual group, called Call to Action, and I found his name on a list made by Call to Action designated as "major donors". I took a snapshot of the list with Msgr. Michael Yarbrough's name highlighted:So, we had the meeting at the bookstore, and after some conversation, I busted him on his heresies and his scandals, and also paid a visit to his church where I was eventually kicked out by his followers (who probably know nothing on how evil this heretic is). Here is the video:For years we have seen how the Vatican covers up for sexual predators and deviants, heretics and debased theologians. But we have never seen how the agents of the Vatican cover up for such evildoers in their private conversations. Well, Shoebat.com is now giving you this exclusive video showing you how the conniving is really done.I confronted Deacon Ron Walker, an official of the Vatican, asking why the Church has done nothing to punish Robert L. Kincl, a priest and canon law judge who was appointed by the Pope himself, who teaches that if two men masturbate each other they do not commit sin, and who himself defended confirmed child molester priest, Fr. Robert Hrdlicka. This is after Shoebat.com filed a complaint against Kincl after we caught him teaching us depravity.Deacon Ron Walker and the Bishop of Austin, Joe Vasquez, and Vicar General Daniel Garcia, did nothing to have Robert L. Kincl punished, even after they promised to take care of this evil. Shoebat.com realized that they were just patronizing us and so we made this video.Here is the video:Robert L. Kincl, who was appointed by the Pope, had befriended us as a fan of Shoebat.com acting as conservative, yet referred to homosexual fondling as permissible in the conversation. Having been shocked at his remarks, I told Kincl:How can you, as a priest, be so liberal toward such a sick evil as two men fondling each other, or as two men having a "relationship" just as long as they are not going with other men. It is evil and it is reprobate.I also told him:It is not tolerable for you, as both a priest and a canon law judge, to be permissive to somebody having a homosexual relationship just as long as they are not being promiscuous with other men. It is deplorable, and in the words of St. Paul, "worthy of death" (Romans 1:32).Kincl defended his position and responded with a rejection of the Old Testament and a twisting of St. Paul's condemnation of homosexuality in Romans, statingWe do not follow the Hebrew Scriptures. We follow Jesus Christ who never mentioned gay relationships. When St. Paul mentioned such a relationship he was referring to the promiscuousness of the Romans using sodomy.Shoebat.com decided to investigate Kincl and found that he has a dark past. In 1993, Kincl worked as a Commander in charge of clergy at the U.S. Navy, and while he was in the service he defended another chaplain confirmed to be guilty of child molestation, named Robert Hrdlicka.The investigation revealed that Robert L. Kincl had even written the authorities, not to charge the pedophile who molested the young boys, but urged them to send him back to serve as a chaplain:Catholic chaplain Lt. Robert Hrdlicka pleaded guilty to molesting boys in 1993. Before his sentencing, six other Catholic Navy chaplains and the church’s archbishop for the military services urged authorities to send Lt. Hrdlicka to a church-run treatment center.“It is my fervent hope and prayer that he will be able to return to the active ministry as soon as possible,” wrote then-Cmdr. Robert L. Kincl.Instead, Lt. Hrdlicka went to prison.Shoebat.com looked up Kincl's My Life page, to find out that after all these years Kincl is still friends with Hrdlicka the pedophile, since he is on his friends list, of which I took snapshots:Just as we have Muslims, like Bergdahl, who have infiltrated the military, we have people like Kincl who have infiltrated both the military and the Catholic Church, with their depravity.Kincl is now serving as a priest in Our Lady's Maronite Catholic Church alongside Msgr. Don Sawyer. When I confronted Sawyer on Kincl, Sawyer vehemently defended Kincl.Robert L. Kincl, depraved priest who defended a child molesting priestDon Sawyer, Msgr. at Our Lady's Maronite Catholic Church where Kincl servesShoebat.com decided to contact the Diocese of Austin to file a complaint, and spoke with the Very Reverend Daniel E. Garcia as the Vicar General for the Diocese of Austin, and Chancellor and Secretariat Director for Administration, Deacon Ron Walker, who were under Bishop Joe S. Vásquez of the Diocese of Austin.We asked them how could someone who supports homosexuality and defended a pedophile still be serving as a priest and not be excommunicated, to which Deacon Ron Walker, rolling his eyes, said that the Church's main objective would be to reconcile him with God, and not excommunicate him.It seems that the Diocese of Austin could care less if one of its priests supports homosexuality and defended a pedophile.Bishop Joe S. VásquezVicar General Danny Garcia of the Diocese of AustinWhy is this man serving as a priest when the Catholic Church, in its teachings, forbids homosexuality?It is not surprising to see how far reaching homosexuality has gone in the Vatican. What other deviancies will enter the Vatican in the next decade remains to be seen. Whatever happened to normal sin? In the good old days, steeling a chicken perhaps constituted such sin, but these days, its sleeping with it.Christianity is not about sycophancy, its about war against evil and the devil. We must arm ourselves to fight in this war.So many today, fattened by materialism and lost in their own ego, want nothing to do with the holy words of the prophet Moses, nor any of the prophets after him, nor the words of the Apostle who declared that sodomites are worthy of death, but continuously want to teach the precepts of a vain secular moralism. I am not speaking of the atheist who denies everything holy and whose blasphemies are expected; I am speaking of supposed “Christians” who carry the title of conservative and who tout themselves as advocates for family values, while at the same time exert themselves to please the sodomites and the acolytes of perversion as they try to censure those who honor the laws of God.I myself have dealt with this numerous times. I remember when I posted my video of me calling thirteen pro-homosexual and homosexual bakeries and asking them for a cake that says “Gay marriage is wrong,” and being denied service every time. The video went viral. Not too long after this happened, Janet Porter a well known conservative personality who I respect, contacted me asking if I would allow her to use clips of my video to add to her documentary exposing the homosexual agenda. I said it would be no problem. The documentary has been out for some time and has already had showings in select theaters in the United States.But then, the spirit of fear crept its way inside. Peter LaBarbera, an Evangelical who is in the documentary, was confronted by the leftist media on the fact he is in the same documentary with me, the man who believes in God’s law that says that sodomites are to be put to death. Instead of defending the law of the Bible, which he claims to believe, this hireling decided to push for me to recant my statements, and said that if I didn’t that I should be removed from the documentary. Janet called me urging me to make a statement to “clarify” what I really believed, that I really don’t believe in the death penalty for sodomites, but simply in the anti-sodomy laws that were once enacted in Texas.To be honest I was quite hesitant to do this because to do so would mean recanting all of my writings in support for the death penalty. Janet sent me the first draft of the statement to receive my stamp of approval. The draft stated:“While I have had homosexual activists call for my death and beheading, etc., I have not called for anyone to take the life of those practicing homosexual behavior. I do want the laws of the United States to once again make sodomy illegal as they did prior to the 2003 Lawrence v. Texas ruling because such practice is not only immoral, but physically dangerous, as well.”But Peter LaBarbera objected to the draft and expressed his dissatisfaction with it, pushing for me to recant my position that an inquisition should be established to uproot homosexuality and other perversities. Peter LaBarbera responded to the draft with this email to Janet:“Not good enough, if he called for an "Inquisition" against homosexuals. We need to look at the exact comments and craft a statement based on those. I do not have time to do that today or tomorrow as I'm driving to DC. We need transcripts of the exact comments and then he needs to disavow that approach (or clarify what he meant). Otherwise people will keep asking about those specific comments.”Peter Labarbera, more afraid of the sodomites than the law of GodAll of these words are filled with fear. LaBarbera is afraid of negative attention from the leftist media. Such behavior is contrary to God, Who is Love, “because perfect love expels all fear.” (1 John 4:18) Why should a Christian be afraid or ashamed of the law of God which states that “If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death” (Leviticus 20:13)? Why should a Christian be ashamed of the words of the Apostle when he said that homosexuals do things that “are worthy of death” (Romans 1:32)? They will say that such words are against love. But how could a Christian use such argumentation when St. Paul himself says that “the purpose of the commandment is love” (1 Timothy 1:5), and in the same epistle goes on to say that “we know that the law is good if one uses it lawfully, knowing this: that the law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless and insubordinate, for the ungodly and for sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, for fornicators, for sodomites” (1 Timothy 1:8-10)?In Christianity, love and justice and indistinguishable, for all virtues, be it justice, charity or endurance, are in love, for God is Love, and in God is all virtue. So how could such Christians say that I am against love, when the purpose of the law is love, and this very law declares that sodomites are worthy of death?Peter LaBarbera was blocked from entering Canada, and he goes before the media showing how persecuted he is, but yet he wants to block me — a Christian — from being in a documentary for being more politically incorrect than him. And at the same time, he kisses the feet of the sodomite to deny me as Peter denied Christ. A filthy sodomite who calls himself “Joe My God”, began to attack LaBarbera for being in the documentary with me. Peter LaBarbera quickly went on Twitter to appease the sodomite, even going to far as to address him with the blasphemous title of “Joe My God”:Why would a Christian address an evil person with such a blasphemous title as "Joe My God"? It is truly pathetic how these modern Christians get on their hands and knees for these useless sodomites. The sodomites make up such a small part of the population, and yet the Christians, who are supposedly the majority, are terrified of them. Caesar wanted the whole world to address him as kyrios, or lord. And yet you never see any of the early Christians ever address Caesar as kyrios. In fact, St. Paul went directly against this idea when he said "that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord" (Philippians 2:11), that is that Christ is Kyrios. Yet this Peter LaBarbera wants to do an inquisition on me, firmly saying "We need to look at the exact comments" and "We need transcripts of the exact comments and then he [Theodore Shoebat] needs to disavow that approach", while at the same time he runs to some sodomite to get his approval. What an absolutely pathetic person. Peter LaBarbera does not want to respect God, but rather "Joe My God".This is why the Christians keep losing ground and the sodomites keep gaining ground. Instead of using the attention that controversy brings, Christians run away from controversy. This is why Christendom is drowning.Another example of this demonic infiltration is Michael Coren, a heretic who lied about being Catholic while holding a position as a news host in Canada. He wrote numerous books about how great Catholicism is, and while praising the Catholic faith, he was attending Anglican church services. Now he has declared his renunciation of the Catholic faith, and has become an open agent for the sodomite religion. He expressed his leaving the Catholic Church by saying, “I could not remain in a church that effectively excluded gay people,” and also saying “I felt a hypocrite being part of a church that described homosexual relations as being disordered and sinful. I just couldn’t be part of it anymore.”So Michael Coren has become an ambassador for the sodomites. Michael Coren is also a betraying, superficial effeminate. He denied me and turned his back on me as he cowered in the presence of two Muslims on Canadian television, when they berated him for referencing our website, shoebat.com. Here is the video:Michael Coren, false Christian, cowered before Muslims, agent of homosexuality and acolyte of the Antichrist.If Michael Coren will betray me for saying that pagan Muslim Albanians need annihilation, then he most certainly will betray Moses for slaughtering the calf worshippers; he most certainly will betray Joshua for exterminating the Canaanites; he most certainly will betray Jehu and Elijah for killing the priests of Baal; and he most definitely has betrayed God Himself, for God ordered the extermination of the wicked.I wrote an email to Michael Coren, telling him:I saw your debate with Shabir Ali and the other Muslim. I have always considered you an ally, and still do. But I must tell you one thing: The cock crowed three times, and you denied me thrice.Michael Coren responded to me fearfully, like a shaking dog, saying:I think we should speak. Is there a number I can call you on later today? Please hear my side before you condemn me. Michael.I heard his side of the story on the phone and left it at that. I had no intentions at that point to make any actions against him. But after seeing how he is now advancing the sodomite religion and going against Christianity, realizing that his appeal meant nothing, now I must respond to him and confront him for the heretic he is. He is a heretic and the worst kind. There is one heretic that says: "I am a heretic. I hate God." But there is the other type, the more deceptive strand that says, "I love God. I am orthodox. But lets tolerate the enemies of God, lets enable them, empower them, allow them to eclipse the light their darkness." This is the worst type of heretic and the most dangerous kind.There are many of these types, who promote the evil, while at the same time calling themselves Catholic.One of these, is Robert Spencer. Recently, Spencer wrote against me for simply exposing the sodomites and their defenders within the “counter-jihad” movement, and for maintaining the prescription of death upon sodomites and those who approve of them and their evils. While it takes one fool to write short articles at the strike of a pen, it takes the wise to write triple to refute it. I will quote Spencer, extensively:In a video posted last Thursday, Theodore Shoebat says: “Pamela Geller is worthy of death.” Her crime? Appearing at a “Gays for Trump” event along with gay activist Milo Yiannopoulos at the Republican National Convention in July. For that, says the learned Shoebat the younger, “In Biblical law, in the government of Christendom, she is worthy of death.”Is that so? Yes, says Theodore, because Romans 1:32 speaks of those who “having known the justice of God, did not understand that they who do such things, are worthy of death, and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them.” Pamela Geller is not homosexual, you see, but by appearing at the event, she gave “consent” to those who are, and thus she also is “worthy of death.”Theodore Shoebat doesn’t mention that this passage refers not only to men who “have burned in their lusts one towards another,” but also to those who are guilty of “iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness,” and are “full of envy, murder, contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers,” as well as “detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,” and those who are “foolish, dissolute, without affection, without fidelity, without mercy” (Romans 1:26-31). All of these people are, in the Apostle Paul’s view, “worthy of death.”Why, then, do we not see Christians (or at least Christians outside of hysterical Hollywood fantasies) committing mass murder, bent on killing everyone who is envious, haughty, and disobedient to his parents? Because Paul’s saying that these people are “worthy of death” is not a call for mass executions and a reign of terror, but part of his argument that all people have sinned and are in need of the divine mercy.In today’s overheated and jihad-preoccupied environment, however, Theodore Shoebat’s charge that Pamela Geller is worthy of death is not theological musing, but arguable incitement to murder.”Robert is both, deceptively twisting my words, and insinuating that I am calling for someone to murder that lunatic wretch, Pamela Geller, and to carry out vigilantism. If Spencer watched the whole video that I did, which he quotes, he would have known that Geller was taking part in an event that has pederastic images of boys, that promotes homosexuality, that advances and inculcates the very evils that God absolutely hates and sees as worthy of destruction.Geller also spoke with a sodomite named Milo, someone who teaches that sodomites are born inheriting genetics that give them higher IQs. This is absolutely akin to Nazism, and for Geller — a Jew — to be associating herself with some of a supremacist ideology, like that of the Nazis and the Social Darwinists -- claiming the idea of superior genetics -- is both evil and diabolical. And yet, I am the bad guy? I never asked anyone to murder Geller. What I said was that in the context of Christendom, heretics like Geller would be put to death, and rightfully so.Also, as we know based on the elucidations of St. John Chrysostom, St. Paul was indeed directing his words towards judges to punish the evildoers, and we also know that it is obvious, based on a full reading of Romans 1, that Paul describes homosexuals, as opposed to merely listing homosexuality as a sin amongst sins.Spencer goes on to say, “Theodore’s words demonstrate that old habits and mindsets die hard and aren’t always effaced by a change of creed”, thereby implying that I am still Islamic in my beliefs. Amazingly, this is coming from a person who does not see himself as judgmental. How does this person know from where I determined my beliefs on this issue? If he would have asked me, I would have shown him. He knows nothing about my intellectual evolution. He does not know that my affirmations were cultivated from reading, firstly, the Scriptures, and then amplified from the fathers and the ancient scholars, like Firmicus, Cyprian, Augustine, Aquinas, Bellarmine, Chrysostom, Ambrose, Vitoria, St. Bernard, St. Bernardino of Siena, and others. Were all of these men jihadists?Tell us, Mr. Spencer, was Augustine a jihadist when he wrote:“Sins against nature, therefore, like the sin of Sodom, are abominable and deserve punishment whenever and wherever they are committed. If all nations committed them, all alike would be held guilty of the same charge in God’s law, for our Maker did not prescribe that we should use each other in this way. In fact, the relationship that we ought to have with God is itself violated when our nature, of which He is Author, is desecrated by perverted lust.” Tell us, was Augustine a jihadist when he wrote that"When God commands a thing to be done against the customs or agreement of any people, though it were never done by them heretofore, it is to be done"; and when he wrote afterwards: "For as among the powers of human society, the greater authority is obeyed in preference to the lesser, so must God in preference to all." (Confess. iii, 8)Tell us, was Augustine a jihadist when he wrote:"A sovereign serves God one way as man, another way as king; he serves Him as man by living according to the faith, he serves Him as king by exerting the necessary strength to sanction laws which command goodness and prohibit the opposite." (Augustine, letter 185, ch. 19)Tell us, was Augustine a jihadist when he wrote in praise of King Hezekiah and Nebuchadnezzar (who was not even a believer) when they enacted edicts against blasphemy and perversity? Was he a jihadist when he wrote:"It was thus that Ezechias [Hezekiah] served Him [God] by destroying the groves and temples of idols and the high places which had been set up contrary to the commandments of God; thus Josias served Him by performing similar acts [see 2 Kings 23:1-25]; thus the king of the Ninevites served Him by compelling the whole city to appease the Lord; thus Darius served Him by giving Daniel power to break the idol, and by feeding his enemies to the lions; thus Nabuchodnosor, of whom we spoke above, served Him when he restrained all his subjects from blaspheming God by a terrible penalty." (Augustine, letter 185, ch. 19, brackets mine) St. AugustineTell us, was King Josiah a jihadist when “he brake down the houses of the sodomites, that were by the house of the Lord, where the women wove hangings for the grove” (1 Kings 23:7)? Tell us, was St. Thomas Aquinas a jihadist when he wrote:“it is lawful to kill an evildoer in so far as it is directed to the welfare of the whole community, so that it belongs to him alone who has charge of the community's welfare. Thus it belongs to a physician to cut off a decayed limb, when he has been entrusted with the care of the health of the whole body. Now the care of the common good is entrusted to persons of rank having public authority: wherefore they alone, and not private individuals, can lawfully put evildoers to death.”Tell us, was Aquinas a jihadist when he prescribed that “heretics, as soon as they are convicted of heresy, to be not only excommunicated but even put to death." (Aquinas, St. Thomas Aquinas: Whether Heretics Should Be Tolerated, II-II, Q. 11, Art. 3, in Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority in Medieval Europe, ch. v, p. 182)St. Thomas AquinasThe Manichaeans promoted homosexuality and cross-dressing, and even devised their own rite in which their followers would eat a false eucharist with male semen on it. Tell us, Spencer, was the Emperor Zeno a jihadist when he decreed:“We ordain that persons who prefer the Manichaeans’ deadly error should have no freedom or leave to dwell in any place whatever of our state; but that, if ever they should have appeared or should have been found, they should be subject to capital punishment.” (Law of Zeno, or Anastasius I, from the year 487 or 510)Tell us, were the authors of the Apostolic Constitutions jihadists when they affirmed the Mosaic Law against homosexuality and beastiality:And fornication is the destruction of one’s own flesh, not being made use of for the procreation of children, but entirely for the sake of pleasure, which is a mark of incontinency, and not a sign of virtue. All these things are forbidden by the laws; for thus say the oracles: “Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind.” “For such a one is accursed, and ye shall stone them with stones: they have wrought abomination.” “Every one that lieth with a beast, slay ye him: he has wrought wickedness in his people.” “And if any one defile a married woman, slay ye them both: they have wrought wickedness; they are guilty; let them die.”Tell us, was St. Jerome a jihadist when he wrote: "To punish murderers and impious men is not shedding blood, but applying the laws." (St. Jerome, Commentary on Jeremiah, in Bellarmine, On Secular People or Laymen, ch. 13, ed. Tutino, p. 50)St. JeromeTell us, was Pope Pius XII, a very recent pope, a jihadist when he wrote, "that which does not correspond to truth or to the norm of morality objectively has no right to exist, to be spread or to be activated." (As quoted by Lefebvre, Religious Liberty Questioned, part 1, p. 14)Tell us, was Moses a jihadist when he had three thousand Jews slaughtered for worshipping the golden calf? In 1550, a Franciscan friar from Brescia, named Calgano, was arrested for having a sodomomatical relationship with a boy, and for teaching that Jesus had a homosexual relationship with St. John. This blasphemer was put to death, without question. This is the Christendom that I love, the Christendom that I want back. But it was put to sleep, and is being kept asleep by heretics like Spencer, who does not want to see the holy laws against perverted heresies enacted. Spencer, in fact, says:“I don’t believe in Islam and don’t wish to live under a government that forces me to conform to its sensibilities; nor do I wish to live under a Christian government that forces non-Christians to conform to its sensibilities.”So Spencer is okay with sodomites roaming the streets, indulging in their evils, inundating society? Is he okay with Geller speaking in a room with disgusting images, with sodomites who demand for the toleration of homosexuality, a practice worthy of death?Essentially, Spencer’s mentality would have us call Moses, King Josiah, Joshua, Hezekiah, and all of the holy men of Christianity who struck and killed evildoers, jihadists. Spencer’s perspective is essentially anti-Christian. It is of the Christian Faith to have governments destroy and uproot evil and perversity. As Augustine said, "they are called Catholic Christians, not servers of idols like your Julian [the pagan emperor]; not heretics, as certain ones have been and have persecuted the Church, when true Christians have suffered the most glorious martyrdom for Catholic truth, not justly deserved penalties for heretical error." *Augustine, letter 105, brackets mine* St. Isidore said that law "is composed of no private advantage, but for the common benefit of the citizens." *Isidore, Etymologiae, 5.21, in Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, Ia IIae 90, article 2*Do you hear that Spencer? Law is for the public benefit, that does not mean the toleration of sodomites, or the freedom given to sodomotical practices. You will then say, “This is America!” Really? Lets look at the laws that were once in the law books, before heretics like yourself let the sodomites take over. Here is a law from New York, 1787:Here is a law from 1796, from Connecticut: Mr. Spencer, were the Americans who established these laws, jihadists? It seems that anyone who wishes to support the divine law against homosexuality is deemed as a “jihadist” or “like ISIS.” This is a manifestation of the Hegelian Dialectic, or controlled opposition. Point to a real threat, and then paint your enemies as being a part of that threat. It used to be that one would call a conservative, “a nazi,” but now they are calling Christians “jihadists” or “Muslims.” Its quite disgusting and low class, but what do you expect from a bunch of people who bow down to the homosexual god every time the sodomite elites want people to conform when they complain of true Christians? Orthodox Christians maintain the holy laws, the elite sodomites complain, and to their remonstrances the conservatives who want to be accepted will get on their hands and knees for the god of Sodom.Spencer begins his article with, “These are times that try men’s souls”, truly they are, and I see what has happened after your soul has been tried, Mr. Spencer: you bow down to the sodomites, and a tart named Pamela has you on her fingertip. anonymous armageddon isis islam war Major Priest In The Catholic Church In Chicago Looks At Naked Children And Gets Sadistic Pleasure From It. Absolutely Evil People Are Trying To Take Over The Vatican Octavio Munoz, false piece caught with child pornography A major priest in the Catholic Church in Chicago was looking at naked children... Read More...»
Mexican Drug Cartel Kidnaps Christian Pastors, Ties Them Up With Ropes And Slaughters All Of Them 0 Mexican drug cartel commandos kidnapped to Catholic priests, tied them up and slaughtered both of them. Here is the report:Two priests kidnapped this morning from a church in Poza Rica, Veracruz, were executed following their abduction.Alejo Nabor Jiménez and José Alfredo Juárez de la Cruz were snatched by armed commandos from Nuestra Señora de Fátima Catholic church, triggering a search operation by state police and the Mexican Army.Their bodies were found at one o’clock this afternoon near the Papantla-Poza Rica highway at a place known as Devil’s Curve in the municipality of Papantla.Their hands and feet had been bound and they had been shot several times with high-caliber rifles.A third man, a church official, was also kidnapped but was located alive but bruised after he reportedly escaped.A report earlier this year said 40 Catholic priests were murdered in Mexico in the last 10 years. The Catholic Multimedia Center (CCM) said crimes against priests soared during the Felipe Calderón administration, when 25 lost their lives.Fifteen had been killed in the first three years of President Enrique Peña Nieto’s term, and two were missing, the report said.An analysis in February by InSight Crime, a crime research organization, suggested that priests who teach messages of social justice and peace are likely to become direct targets of organized crime gangs.A priest at CCM said an activist role can put them on the front line. “They defend migrants, they’re against drug trafficking,” said Omar Sotelo. “And they often know who the criminals are, having seen them grow up in the towns.”Some will therefore see the priests as a threat, he said.Mexico is, right now, in a state of despotism more severe than that of the Calles regime, against which Catholics fought in the Cristero War. Mexico is the most dangerous nation on the Western Hemisphere to be a Catholic priest. The narcos are all devil worshippers and occultists, they hate the Catholic Faith and want to utterly uproot it, for they cannot fully take over Mexico spiritually and culturally unless they destroy the biggest obstacle, and that is the Church. I did a whole documentary on this subject, and I encourage you to watch it and to tell as many people about it as possible: anonymous armageddon isis islam war Mexican Drug Cartel Kidnaps Christian Pastors, Ties Them Up With Ropes And Slaughters All Of Them Mexican drug cartel commandos kidnapped to Catholic priests, tied them up and slaughtered both of them. Here is the report: Two priests... Read More...» ISIS Arrests Elderly Muslim Imam After He Has Dream Prophesying Their Destruction 0 In a panicked, desperate bid to hold on to their power as it slips away through their fingers like grains of sand, ISIS arrested an elderly Muslim man after they found out he had a dream prophesying the destruction of ISIS:The Islamic State terrorist organization has reportedly abducted a 70-year-old prayer leader because he said he had dream about the barbaric militant group's downfall in its largest stronghold in Iraq, the city of Mosul.According to local sources who spoke with the Iranian-based AhlulBayt News Agency, militants captured the elderly man, who was a prayer leader at a mosque in Mosul, after he claimed that he was given a prophecy in a dream about the demise of IS' control of the city.As IS continues to suffer from declining oil revenues and U.S. President Obama and Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi vowed on Monday to launch an offensive to recapture Iraq's second largest city within months, the militant group's leaders have barred Mosul residents talking about military successes against IS.The local sources say IS leaders heard about the man's dream after the news of it had spread around the city. The jihadis subsequently raided the man's home in the Tahrir district of Mosul and detained him.It is unclear as to what kind of punishment IS leaders have planned for the elderly man, but the militant group has heinously punished people in the past for simply talking about the advances of the Iraqi military.(source)Prophesy is not to be taken lightly. Likewise, it also includes people who are non-Christians. This is because, if God truly is love and man is truly made in the image and likeness of God, then God's love extends to all people, and He will speak to them in their particular situations and lead them to the truth. It has happened before, and it will again.It was inevitable that ISIS would fall eventually, as Islam is an evil religion and ISIS practices the evil which Islam preaches. How interesting it is that ISIS would be so desperate to hold on to its power that it would attempt to destroy a simple message this old man has.ISIS knows what it is doing is evil, and its time is running out.Mene, mene, tekel, upharsin. Enjoy what time you have left- the writing is on the wall.Balshazzar's Feast by Rembrant anonymous armageddon isis islam war ISIS Arrests Elderly Muslim Imam After He Has Dream Prophesying Their Destruction In a panicked, desperate bid to hold on to their power as it slips away through their fingers like grains of sand, ISIS arrested an eld... Read More...»
ISIS Arrests Elderly Muslim Imam After He Has Dream Prophesying Their Destruction 0 In a panicked, desperate bid to hold on to their power as it slips away through their fingers like grains of sand, ISIS arrested an elderly Muslim man after they found out he had a dream prophesying the destruction of ISIS:The Islamic State terrorist organization has reportedly abducted a 70-year-old prayer leader because he said he had dream about the barbaric militant group's downfall in its largest stronghold in Iraq, the city of Mosul.According to local sources who spoke with the Iranian-based AhlulBayt News Agency, militants captured the elderly man, who was a prayer leader at a mosque in Mosul, after he claimed that he was given a prophecy in a dream about the demise of IS' control of the city.As IS continues to suffer from declining oil revenues and U.S. President Obama and Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi vowed on Monday to launch an offensive to recapture Iraq's second largest city within months, the militant group's leaders have barred Mosul residents talking about military successes against IS.The local sources say IS leaders heard about the man's dream after the news of it had spread around the city. The jihadis subsequently raided the man's home in the Tahrir district of Mosul and detained him.It is unclear as to what kind of punishment IS leaders have planned for the elderly man, but the militant group has heinously punished people in the past for simply talking about the advances of the Iraqi military.(source)Prophesy is not to be taken lightly. Likewise, it also includes people who are non-Christians. This is because, if God truly is love and man is truly made in the image and likeness of God, then God's love extends to all people, and He will speak to them in their particular situations and lead them to the truth. It has happened before, and it will again.It was inevitable that ISIS would fall eventually, as Islam is an evil religion and ISIS practices the evil which Islam preaches. How interesting it is that ISIS would be so desperate to hold on to its power that it would attempt to destroy a simple message this old man has.ISIS knows what it is doing is evil, and its time is running out.Mene, mene, tekel, upharsin. Enjoy what time you have left- the writing is on the wall.Balshazzar's Feast by Rembrant anonymous armageddon isis islam war ISIS Arrests Elderly Muslim Imam After He Has Dream Prophesying Their Destruction In a panicked, desperate bid to hold on to their power as it slips away through their fingers like grains of sand, ISIS arrested an eld... Read More...»