ANONYMOUS - OUR VOICE

While Muslims Are Getting Brand New Taxpayer Funded Mosques, These Same Governments Are Destroying Ancient Churches In The Name Of 'Saving Money'

Great civilizations do not die- they commit suicide because they choose to cease to exist. This is cultural suicide caught on video:<iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/S8pXJWVszNM?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe><blockquote>According to a report of the French senate, 2.800 churches across the country, many of them centuries old, will be demolished as restoration costs exceed the cost of demolitions over the next years. This church, Église Saint-Jacques d'Abbeville, a Neo-Gothic masterpiece in Abbeville, Nord-Pas-de-Calais-Picardie dating back to 1868, was demolished for a total cost of 350,000€ in 2013. The reasoning: It was much cheaper to demolish it than it would cost to restore.As the number of Frenchmen in France continues to decline due to record-low birth rates, high emigration and Muslim immigration, so do the members of catholic faith, who are now at an all time low. For many cities in France, especially cities in which Christians are the minority, the lack of interest and high property value on which the buildings stand simply does not justify the cost of restoring the churches. Many mayors choose the cheaper demolitions over costly restorations. Thousands of churches are to be demolished over the next years and replaced with shopping malls, stores, apartments or parking lots.Mosque on the other hand, flourish. The Grand Mosque of Paris recently got a modern, fully retractable Roof, as it is usually only found in football stadiums and hundreds of new Mosques are built every year for the hundreds of thousands of new Muslims born or immigrating into French society, often with taxpayer money.</blockquote>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war While Muslims Are Getting Brand New Taxpayer Funded Mosques, These Same Governments Are Destroying Ancient Churches In The Name Of 'Saving Money'

Great civilizations do not die- they commit suicide because they choose to cease to exist. This is cultural suicide caught on video: Ac...

Muslim Brotherhood Infiltrates World's Largest Evangelical Christian Charity, Takes Money Meant To Help Christians And Uses It To Build A Military Base To Wage War On Christians And Jews

<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/90674993_mediaitem90674992.jpg"><img alt="_90674993_mediaitem90674992" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-102393" height="169" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/90674993_mediaitem90674992-300x169.jpg" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/90674993_mediaitem90674992-300x169.jpg 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/90674993_mediaitem90674992.jpg 660w" width="300" /></a>World Vision is the world's largest Evangelical Christian charity, receiving millions of dollars each year and helping some of the world's neediest people. However the Muslim Brotherhood operatives have just been busted for infiltrating the charity and stealing tens of millions of dollars- 60% of the charity's funds- and redirecting them to the Muslim Brotherhood to wage war on Christians and Jews:<blockquote>Mohammed El Halabi, an employee of World Vision, the world’s largest evangelical Christian charity, has been charged in Israel with funneling tens of millions of dollars to the military wing of Hamas, a designated international terrorist organization affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood.The arrest was made June 16, according to the Israeli daily Haaretz, but a gag order on the case files was lifted Wednesday and Halabi was indicted Thursday. The indictment reveals details of how Hamas infiltrated Federal Way, Washington-based World Vision, a global Christian outreach active in nearly 100 countries.Halabi, director of World Vision’s Gaza branch, was detained at the Erez crossing in Israel as he was headed back to Gaza on his way home from “routine meetings,” several Israeli news outlets were reporting.Halabi was being held since June “without access to legal counsel or family visits,” which is normal procedure in Israel for prisoners charged with terrorist-related crimes....But Halabi only used his “humanitarian” mask as cover for his Islamist work, according to the prosecution’s presentation Thursday in Beer Sheva District Court.The prosecutor described him as a Hamas activist who has been using his high position in the charity to systematically divert millions of dollars to the military arm of Hamas, financing, among other things, the digging of terror tunnels, the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/israel-hamas-dominates-world-vision-christian-charity-usurping-cash-provisions-permits/2016/08/04/">Jewish Press reported</a>.The secret terrorist funding, according to Thursday’s indictment, was taken out of donations and resources that had been dedicated to humanitarian assistance for Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip. The indictment includes 12 counts of security violations of passing information to the enemy, membership in a terror organization, funding terrorism, participation in an unlawful association, and contact with foreign agents....Hamas is the Palestinian wing of the Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamist organization whose goal is to inspire Muslims worldwide to return to the roots of their faith as spelled out in the Quran and create a global caliphate under Shariah law. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/largest-christian-charity-infiltrated-by-hamas/">source</a>, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-36974350">source</a>)</blockquote>So there you have it. People say that it is "conspiracy theory" that Muslims are infiltrating the West, robbing our money, and using positions of power to destroy it from within, the proof has been building for years, and this is looking like it may be one of the biggest scandals yet in this regard, and there is deafening silence in the media. All the screams of "racism" that were leveled against us for reporting on cases such as the Khizr Khan scandal are all being shown to be true- there is a concerted effort being made to destroy the West from within.We knew for years the Muslims were doing this. Truly, the biggest traitors are those within our own societies who know but refuse to acknowledge this is happening.

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Muslim Brotherhood Infiltrates World's Largest Evangelical Christian Charity, Takes Money Meant To Help Christians And Uses It To Build A Military Base To Wage War On Christians And Jews

World Vision is the world's largest Evangelical Christian charity, receiving millions of dollars each year and helping some of the ...

Make No Mistake, Muslims Are Only Coming To Europe Because They Want To Sexually Molest Blonde Women And Get Free Stuff -Major Muslim Professor And Psychologist Rip Into Western Europe's "New Normal"

<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/norway-gang-rape-1.png"><img alt="norway-gang-rape-1" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-102385" height="158" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/norway-gang-rape-1-300x158.png" srcset="http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/norway-gang-rape-1-300x158.png 300w, http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/norway-gang-rape-1.png 627w" width="300" /></a>***NOTE: Merkel's STASI Operatives at Facebook just took this post down again. Share this as widely as you can and get the word out because WE WILL NOT BE CENSORED!***In a scathing criticism of Merkel's "new normal" for Germany, a major Muslim professor and a Muslim psychologist say that Muslim men feel entitled to rape because they are told if they go to Europe it will be like Muslim heaven- they will get free everything and unlimited sex with blonde women:<blockquote>The German-Syrian Islamic scholar Prof. Bassam Tibi explains in an interview why the hundreds of thousands of Arab asylum seekers come just to Germany. In addition to economic reasons, especially the desire for a blonde woman plays a major role.The <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=3&hl=en&nv=1&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=de&tl=en&u=http://bazonline.ch/ausland/europa/diese-maenner-denken-deutsche-frauen-sind-schlampen/story/22916308&usg=ALkJrhhf-xx23Y9MjnacQ3tbu2_hrXofCQ">Basler Zeitung</a> , he said that Arab men often come with high expectations to Germany. You would see in their countries of origin, that it is "great apartments, blonde women and the welfare state" are in Germany..."Many Egyptians believe that is still, blonde women are just waiting to be married by an Egyptian," he says of the Cologne Rundschau .The Turkish-born doctor and psychiatrist Dr. med. Meryam Schouler-Ocak, who works at the Berlin Charité, also sees great problems to come to Germany. In an interview with the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=3&hl=en&nv=1&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=de&tl=en&u=http://www.deutschlandradiokultur.de/junge-muslime-und-die-sexuelle-selbstbestimmung-der.976.de.html%3Fdram:article_id%3D360090&usg=ALkJrhixCQCLAxKR2fcjJygdblckZlaDjw">Germany radio</a> she says:"I think we perhaps should comment briefly on the young men, because those are young men who are not used to it, that you can see quite a lot of skin of women, even blond women, blue-eyed women, so women which are also an ideal quasi in their regions of origin, in their conceptions of beauty, an object of desire. and suddenly there are so many here and suddenly know you do not know where the boundaries are. "It also points out that rejections of German women could quickly lead to frustration among asylum seekers. Rape and other sexual assaults are the result."And if you get what else, not once but several times, then you may here also changing sexual behavior in a negative sense, for the women," said the psychiatrist.If one in Arabic "German Women" enters at Google, is the second most common search term "German women and sex".In a sample we could find dozens of Arab and Pakistani websites within three minutes, to which German women are consistently portrayed as blue-eyed blondes.These pages were often shared thousands of times on Facebook.Even Sweden is a popular destination for Arab applicants. The Socialist dailyÖstersunds Posten reported as smugglers advertise on their websites specifically for northern European countries.There the men are informed that they are accommodated in a hotel until they get a free apartment from the state. Then they could sit back and enjoy a tax-financed luxury living.Much like in the pages about Germany blond girlfriends Arabs are promised when they make their way to Northern Europe."On the train sitting young Syrian men who are lured with an ancient scam -. Money and women are distributed pictures of pretty blondes and one says that Swedish women demonstrate because they call men", writes the newspaper.</blockquote>The media has been continually lying about these Muslims- saying they are coming for jobs, a better life, more opportunity- the list goes on. Then real reason, according to these major and respected Muslim voices who are also critics of what is happening right now, is what everybody already knows because it is the sinister truth- the Muslims are coming because they are lazy parasites on the underbelly of civilization who contribute nothing and only want to take. They feel entitled to a life of luxury and lust, paid for by the fruit and labor of another, and their religion gives them justification for their actions.Islam is  a worm in the apple of civilization. If allowed to, it will eat a civilization from within until it collapses on itself from the destruction. The only way to save the apple is to remove, destroy, or remove and destroy the worm. It is about time that Europeans started taking care of their apples until this Mohammedan worm eats them all.<iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/3_5Ipl_qaIY?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Make No Mistake, Muslims Are Only Coming To Europe Because They Want To Sexually Molest Blonde Women And Get Free Stuff -Major Muslim Professor And Psychologist Rip Into Western Europe's "New Normal"

***NOTE: Merkel's STASI Operatives at Facebook just took this post down again. Share this as widely as you can and get the word out...

What Every American Must Know About Sharia BEFORE They Vote: How Hillary Clinton Duped America By Pushing Khizr Khan, A Sharia Muslim Scholar

By Walid ShoebatI had a litany of so-called rebuttals on my articles I wrote [<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2016/08/02/hillary-is-busted-read-the-real-booklet-hillarys-man-was-carrying-for-years-it-was-the-muslim-shariah-constitution-and-not-the-u-s-constitution/">here</a> and <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/2016/07/31/what-the-media-is-not-telling-you-about-the-muslim-who-attacked-donald-trump-he-is-a-muslim-brotherhood-agent-who-wants-to-advance-sharia-law-and-bring-muslims-into-the-united-states/">here</a>] regarding Hillary's man, Khizr Khan. In summary, they stipulated that Khan does not support Sharia or the Muslim Brotherhood. They used pure liberal sophism. There summary goes like this: an essay written by Khan about Shariah does not prove Khan is a Shariah supporting man.This of course can be refuted by a simple question: if an orthodox Rabbi writes on Jewish law, would that mean he does not uphold such laws, and if an orthodox Christian writes on Christian ethics, would that mean he does not uphold such ethics?To say that these do not uphold their dogmas would be absurd.The question I ask should end the controversy, but it never does because the ignorant only uses sophism to create a controversy which creates doubt. This liberal tactic which permeates the media is not done because the American liberal is an ignoramus who knows nothing about Sharia. No no no. It is done because these Americans do not mind the agents of Shariah since Sharia goes against Christian ethics. The liberal too has tradition similar to the tribal Muslim from the middle east where:<blockquote>"me and my brother are against my cousin and me and my cousin are against the stranger".</blockquote>The Christian, to the Muslim and the Liberal, is the enemy of both. Muslims and Liberals are in reality cousins. The Muslim Brotherhood had worked for decades to perfect a system where liberals would be used to advance Sharia. The <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://counterjihad.com/backgrounder/an-explanatory-memorandum-the-brotherhoods-plan/">Muslim Brotherhood states</a>:<blockquote>“The [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers…”</blockquote>According to the Muslim Brotherhood, there are two agents here: the liberal first, than the Muslim believer (Muslim immigrant).The whole reason of us looking into Khan's writings is that it debunks the notion that Khan was simply a 'secular Muslim' who could care less about strict Sharia.But Sharia is Islam and Islam is Sharia. Period. The fact that Khan was Muslim should suffice. However, the fact that Khan is a Sharia scholar and an expert on Islamic jurisprudence makes it even clearer that Khan is an Islamist who thanked Saeed Ramadan, a father of the Muslim Brotherhood for using his sources.Shouldn't this suffice? To the anti-Christian crowds, it doesn't, nothing will, nothing will ever will.To the Muslim Brotherhood, if the Muslim can produce a suicide bomber, the liberal can produce national suicide. And if in doubt, just see how one man (Khan) caused Donald Trump to decline a notch.Khan referred to Al-Wathaiq Al-Siyasiyah and Al-Muwatta, two Muslim sources for Sharia which we referred to from Khan's own writing. And since these two are bad-apples, the liberals refuted:<blockquote>"where does he give a "recommendation for Muslims to use Al-Wathaiq Al-Siyasiyah..."? I see him reference the text, but that alone is not a recommendation to use it."</blockquote>And since these two are riddled with Jihad, the liberal tried to find a way out.The liberal media and Hillary (who are expert politicians) know that short soundbites demand entire essays to refute.Since Americans hate long essays on how Islamic Sharia works, the veil covers the eyes of millions.REFUTING ALL WHO SAY KHAN DOES NOT SUPPORT SHARIA Sharia has three sources. In Khan's scholarly essay, all he does, like all orthodox Muslims do, is to uphold the sequence, the three sources of Shariah. The top two are the Quran (which is thus says Allah) and then comes the Sunna (which is thus says the prophet Muhammad). The third is the jurisprudence of the Muslim fathers (Tradition) or what Islam calls Fiqh.To keep it kiss, Americans need to understand this basic principle: Islam mimicked from Catholicism during the Byzantine era a system basis derived from the Catholic faith where Scripture,  Tradition and Authoritative teaching (Magesterium) all three prongs are collectively used in one structure. Similarly, an Orthodox Muslim upholds his three: Quran, Sunna and Tradition and all three are used as a single structure called Shari'ah.Islam copied Catholicism's structure and is why "it looks like a lamb with two horns and speaks like a dragon". Islam therefore attempts to mimmic the real deal (Christianity) while its "red dragon" sends a flood of Jihadis (Revelation 12) who use the three stages of Jihad: the tongue (which Khan used at Hillary's campaign), the pen (which Khan used in his writings) and the sword (which Khan's writings support).The "secular Muslim" whom many in the West tout as "moderate" are in reality Muslims who simply say that we need only use the Quran. These want you to believe that the Quran should be read and interpreted exclusively without tradition. This way "Jihad" simply becomes a "struggle within" and "kill" "is only in warfare and self-defense".Such divide is made to fool westerners into thinking that Islam is similar to Christendom's split where good Protestants simply uphold the Bible (Sola Scriptura) while the bad Catholics continued to uphold all three: Scripture, Tradition and Authoritative teaching (Magesterium).The difference is that Muslim 'protestant' scholars simply do not exist. So far, no one from the bleeding hearts in the U.S. Administration was able to find a handful of universally accepted Imams and Muslim scholars who believe in Sola Quranica. If so, produce the names? No one in the U.S. Administration so far produced one scholar.Khizr Khan in fact does not denounce anything Sharia. His writ is simply giving the sequence of authority in Islam regarding Sharia. In his "Shari'ah Explained" and similar to how Catholics break their system, he breaks them into three, :<blockquote>"A) the Quran ... B) The Sunna ... C) Probity of Jurists and Muslim Jurisprudence- Al-fiqh" (see pages 25-29).</blockquote>The "al-Fiqh" to a Muslim is as the Magesterium to a Catholic. Khan is not simply any lay Muslim. He is a top-notch scholar on Shariah. To Khan, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.google.com/#q=%22الوثائق+السياسية%22+%22حميد+الله%22&start=10">Al-Wathaiq Al-Siyasiyah</a> (literally the political documents) which are the oldest collection of Muhammad's covenants are the initial Sharia just as the Didache (the writings of the apostles) are to the primitive Church. Dr. <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://books.google.com/books?id=YoxJCwAAQBAJ&pg=PT621&lpg=PT621&dq=%22الوثائق+السياسية%22+%22حميد+الله%22&source=bl&ots=kvZfTjp0vZ&sig=ohmaYYJk2psMWvY1gI-fwEvKHXQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiNtuu4pKjOAhVBNSYKHYlvDi44ChDoAQhQMAk#v=onepage&q=%22الوثائق%20السياسية%22%20%22حميد%20الله%22&f=false">Hamidullah</a> collected these documents which became the Muslim's 'Didache'. A search on  <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.google.com/#q=%22الوثائق+السياسية%22+%22حميد+الله%22&start=10">Al-Wathaiq Al-Siyasiyah</a> produces zero rejection by any Muslim scholar of such documents. Such rejection would be as if a Catholic scholar would denounce and reject the Didache.Except that, Al-Wathaiq Al-Siyasiyah is <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.saaid.net/arabic/524.htm?print_it=1">literally "political Shariah</a>". When it comes to these documents, Khan never denounces these, but upholds them as a secondary authority just as a Christian would do with the Didache. Khan writes:<blockquote>"In reliable reference books of Sunnah, written documents dictated by the Prophet are frequently mentioned and authenticated. (v) In his book Al-Wathaiq Al-Siyasiyah, 4 Dr. M. Hamidullah records 250 documents emanating from the Prophet and written down in his presence. These limited examples may serve to present the often ignored fact that the recent famous compilations of Hadith were by no means the first written documents relating to the Sunnah. With the exception of the Quran and Sunnah, every other source, chief or supplementary, has been a matter of controversy as to its validity or definition. There were some jurists who even considered the Holy Book [Sola Quranica], on which depends the very authority of the Sunnah, as the sole basic source of all Islamic jurisprudence.2 A careful examination of those sources, and of the extensive researches relating to them, would further distinguish the line that separates the first two sources from the rest of the sources. The latter were introduced at least a century after the Prophet, and were built upon the opinions of individual jurists. Such opinions should be subordinated, as in fact they were to the Quran and Sunnah, and not placed above them."</blockquote>Therefore, Al-Wathaiq Al-Siyasiyah is not some hodgepodge of documents to be ignored, they are, as Khan states "250 documents emanating from the Prophet and written down in his presence". They are therefore subordinates to Sunna. They are never made null-and-void. In the last line, all Khan is saying is that these should be subordinated to the top two: 1)Quran, 2)Sunna.In other words, they are #3. They are still Shari'ah.Khizr in fact affirms this:<blockquote>"The question of the sources which the jurists relied upon, or of the opinions they derived therefrom, is always open to reconsideration as to their compliance with the Quranic and Prophetic texts (Sunnah) and the fulfillment of their objectives. The passing away of Prophet Muhammed came after the declaration of the Quran, "This day I have perfected your religion [Islam]."3 This was explicitly emphasized by him in his last sermon, "0 people, bear in mind what I am saying, for I might not see you again. I have left you two things. If you hold fast to them never will you go astray after me. They are: God's Book [Quran] and His Prophet's Sunnah [Hadith]."4 None of the caliphs (successors) of the Prophet claimed the right to be a new source of legislation. Abu Bakr, the first caliph, whenever passing a judgment, looked into the [1] Quran. If he found an applicable text therein, he would apply it. If not, he turned to the [2] Sunnah. If he found an applicable text therein, he would apply it. If not, he would ask the people whether any of them knew of a judgment passed by the Prophet on the particular issue. It some-times happened that some people would come forward and state that the Prophet had passed a judgment on it. If there was nothing at all, he would summon the [3] chief representatives of the people and consult with them.'"</blockquote>1,2, and 3, are the legs of Islam's footstool. This third "chief representatives of the people" is tradition, and the command to obey this literally stems from the Quran itself where it stated:<blockquote>يا أَيُّهَا الَّذينَ آمَنوا أَطيعُوا اللَّهَ وَأَطيعُوا الرَّسولَ وَأُولِي الأَمرِ مِنكُمO ye who believe! Obey [1] Allah [Quran], and obey the [2] Messenger [Sunna], and [3] those charged with authority among you [Tradition]. — Quran,4:59</blockquote>The "authority among you" produced Al-Muwatta and Wal-Wathaiq Al-Siyasiyah. Obeying these is an instruction from the Quran itself. In other words, whatever is not in the Quran or the Sunna, it too was also established through jurisprudence (tradition) and must be obeyed so long it does not conflict with the main two.Obeying tradition in Islam is essential or else the individual is no longer considered Muslim  just as a Catholic who denounces the other two authorities becomes no longer Catholic.In the Muslim world, there never once arose a Martin Luther. Therefore, dividing religious Muslims who hide this truth by saying they only adhere to the Quran by asking westerners "Quranic chapter and verse please" is a farce.Muslims, like Dr. Zuhdi Jasser is literally attempting to start what he calls "The Muslim Reform Movement". But until Jasser becomes a 'Martin Luther' with millions of  adherents, this discussion on Muslim reformation becomes child's play. Jasser is no Muslim scholar or an Imam who can pit reformation articles on the doors of the Kaaba.He says that he will (like Luther) "pin it on the doors of mosques":<iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/xlAnr8bIIr8?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&start=380&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe>To Protestant America this sounds great. But for Shari'ah to reform, the U.S. must become the Mecca for every Muslim and Jasser becomes the Luther. This is a message palatable only to the naive.To remove Quran 4:59 is like convincing two billion Catholics to remove or re-interpret:<blockquote>"brothers, stand firm and hold to the traditions that you were taught by us, either by our spoken word or by our letter." (2 Thessalonians 2:15)</blockquote>Removing Islamic traditional teachings is impossible. What we see in fact happening in the last few decades is quite the opposite: an Islamic revival and not Jasser's 'Islamic reformation'.In NO WAY does Khan denounce these two other writs as Al-Muwatta and Al-Siyasiyah (Muslim Didache). He simply gives an example on how one Caliph, Harun al-Rashid, wanted to strictly and exclusively use Al-Muwatta for Islam's law yet the Caliph was refuted by Al-Muwatta's author, Malik. This is by no means a rejection but an upholding of it in the proper sequence of authority. Khan confirms this:<div class="page" title="Page 10"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><blockquote>Ibn al-Qayyim records specific statements testifying to the fact that all of these jurists gave priority even to traditions which were not fully authenticated over their own individual conclusions. An incident illustrative of the probity of the early Muslim jurists is the famous attitude of Malik to the caliph's proposal to enforce Al-Muwatta (Malik's book) as a uniform legal code throughout the Islamic state. Harun al-Rashid, the caliph, insisted on this proposal and even went so far as to suggest that the book be hung in the Ka'aba to symbolize the general reverence for the book and to bring about legal uniformity in the Muslim nation. But Malik, with clarity of mind and heart, rejected the enticing proposal of the caliph and said, "Oh, leader of the believers! ... Difference among Muslim scholars is but a divine mercy for this nation. Each of them is following what he considers to be right, and each of them has his own argument, and all of them are sincerely striving in the way of God."19. AI-Shafi'!, A1-Risalah, (Arabic), 476-86. 20. AI-Sharani, Al-Mizan, (Arabic), at 51. 21. A1-Shawkani Al-Qawl al-Mufid filIjtihad, 15-27.</blockquote></div></div></div>Khan affirms that Al-Muwatta' like the rest of jurisprudence all of them are sincerely striving in the way of God, and he simply sets the precedence that these are the third part of Sharia:<blockquote>"Jurisdiction is to be administered on the basis of [1] Quran and [2] Sunnah ... Clear understanding of every case that is brought to you for which there is no applicable text of [1] Quran and [2] Sunnah. Yours, then, is a role of comparison and analogy, so as to distinguish similarities and dissimilarities-thereupon seeking your way to the judgment that seems nearest to justice and apt to be the best in the eyes of God. Never succumb to anger or anxiety, and never get impatient or tired of your litigants.These are brief extracts from a long letter that has been held authentic by all Muslim jurists. It vividly demonstrates that the structure of Islamic law-the Shari'ah-was completed during the lifetime of Prophet Muhammed, in the Quran and Sunnah. This brings up an important fact which is generally overlooked, that the invariable and basic rules of Islamic Law are only those prescribed in the Shari'ah (Quran and Sunnah), which are few and limited. All other [3] juridical works which have been written during more than thirteen centuries are very rich and indispensable, but they must always be subordinated to the Shari'ah and open to reconsideration by all Muslims." [END OF QUOTE]</blockquote>Khan therefore insists:<blockquote>"All other juridical works [example: Muwatta, Siyasiyeh all other Tradition] which have been written during more than thirteen centuries are "very rich and indispensable".</blockquote>These are not denounced but are upheld according to Shari'ah itself as the Quran itself referred to the Fiqh in Quran 4:59.He stipulates that:<blockquote>"they must always be subordinated to the Shari'ah and open to reconsideration by all Muslims."</blockquote>In other words, this is so, so long they do not oppose Quran and Sunna.Lesson learned? There is no Sola Quranica in Islam.The case therefore is very clear. The problem is relating it to Americans who cannot fathom more than a 1000 words article and is why many attempted to debunk but failed to follow simple reasoning.Hillary is not ignorant, in that she knows that Americans who are used to sound bites, will never dig deeper than a line on twitter and the typical left-wing sophist rhetoric.The problem therefore is not fact, it is the ignorance of the citizen. America was a nation set up where for one to become citizen was required to understand American principles. The problem is not an issue of reformation as Hillary wants to change this nation to accept foreign ideas, but a restoration which Trump calls on to remove an infiltration into our nation. The issue is the same in Christendom. We need to restore not reform. Truth needs no reformation, for if this is so, it presumes that our fathers followed a lie. God forbid what Allah or socialism permits.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1Eld2OqJBM<div class="h5ab-print-button-container"><div class="h5ab-print-button h5ab-print-button-left" style="cursor: pointer; color: #555">							print</div></div><div class="sharedaddy sd-sharing-enabled"><div class="robots-nocontent sd-block sd-social sd-social-icon-text sd-sharing">

anonymous armageddon isis islam war What Every American Must Know About Sharia BEFORE They Vote: How Hillary Clinton Duped America By Pushing Khizr Khan, A Sharia Muslim Scholar

By Walid Shoebat I had a litany of so-called rebuttals on my articles I wrote [ here and here ] regarding Hillary's man, Khizr Kha...

Very Powerful Muslim Leader Makes This Declaration Out To Christians: "We will be booby-trapping and blowing up every church that we are able to reach, and killing all of those Christians who we find from the citizens of the cross."

Abu Musab al-Barnawi, the new leader of Boko Haram, recently did an interview with ISIS in which he declared this message to Christians, that the Muslim jihadists will be "booby-trapping and blowing up every church that we are able to reach, and killing all of those (Christians) who we find from the citizens of the cross." Here is the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/blow-up-church-kill-christians-boko-haram-new-leader-isis/1/731724.html">full report:</a><blockquote>Nigeria's Boko Haram Islamic extremists have a new leader who is threatening to bomb churches and kill Christians while ending attacks on mosques and markets used by ordinary Muslims, according to an interview published Wednesday by the Islamic State group.He also says there is a Western plot to Christianize the region and has accused charities of using their aid for that, according to a SITE Intelligence Group translation of an interview published on Wednesday in the Islamic State newspaper al-Nabaa.The newspaper identified Abu Musab al-Barnawi as the new "Wali," or governor, of its so-called West Africa Province. The "Wali" title was previously used to describe long-time Boko Haram leader Abubakar Shekau.The report did not say what Shekau's current status was, although there have been rumors for weeks that he had been replaced.STRATEGY CHANGED, WILL TARGET CHRISTIANS NOWThe interview with al-Barnawi indicates a major shift in strategy for the Nigerian extremists, who have killed many more Muslims than Christians in attacks in mosques with suicide bombers and gunmen.There have also been attacks on crowded marketplaces in predominantly Muslim areas and the killings and kidnappings of school children. The targeting of students accounts for its nickname Boko Haram, which means Western education is sinful or forbidden."They strongly seek to Christianize the society. ... They exploit the condition of those who are displaced under the raging war, providing them with food and shelter and then Christianizing their children," SITE Intelligence quotes the new leader as saying.Al-Barnawi says the militants will respond to that threat by "booby-trapping and blowing up every church that we are able to reach, and killing all of those (Christians) who we find from the citizens of the cross."</blockquote><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://ffmu.webconnex.com/rescuechristians">CHRISTIANS ARE BEING KILLED AND RAPED EVERY SINGLE DAY, PLEASE CLICK HERE TO MAKE A DONATION TO OUR RESCUE TEAM THAT WILL SAVE THE LIVES OF CHRISTIANS FROM PERSECUTION</a><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="/subscribe-to-tbat-newsletter/">PERSECUTION IS COMING, AND EVENTUALLY SHOEBAT.COM IS GOING TO BE PULLED OUT OF YOUTUBE. PRETTY SOON THE BEST WAY TO REACH US WILL BE THROUGH OUR NEWSLETTER. CLICK HERE TO JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER, AND CONTINUE EDUCATING YOURSELF ON WHAT THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA WON’T REPORT</a><div class="h5ab-print-button-container"><div class="h5ab-print-button h5ab-print-button-left" style="cursor: pointer; color: #555">							print</div></div><div class="sharedaddy sd-sharing-enabled"><div class="robots-nocontent sd-block sd-social sd-social-icon-text sd-sharing">

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Very Powerful Muslim Leader Makes This Declaration Out To Christians: "We will be booby-trapping and blowing up every church that we are able to reach, and killing all of those Christians who we find from the citizens of the cross."

Abu Musab al-Barnawi, the new leader of Boko Haram, recently did an interview with ISIS in which he declared this message to Christians...

Muslim Throws Molotov Cocktail Into Public Bus In France And Burns It To The Ground In The Middle Of The Street, Screams 'Allahu Akbar' While Doing It

The Media tried to cover up the whole incident, but thanks to phones and cameras it is impossible to hide the evil things these Muslims do any more from the eyes of the world:<iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/7Den80ckxcI?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent' allowfullscreen='true' style='border:0;'></iframe><blockquote><div class="article__summary summary ">Footage has surfaced showing a group of young men setting a bus alight with Molotov cocktails after blocking its way with makeshift barricade in Paris. The perpetrators were reportedly heard shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’.</div></blockquote><div class="article__text text "><blockquote>The footage, which started to spread on social media on Wednesday, shows the attack that occurred in the Paris suburb of Saint-Denis last week.A group of young men is seen rolling trash containers to the midst of the road in front of an approaching bus to “set up a trap to force the bus to stop,” police said, as cited by L’Express.In the video, which was presumably shot from one of the nearby buildings, the attackers are heard shouting “Allahu Akbar”After bringing the vehicle to a halt, the assailants forced the driver and five passengers out. The men then start kicking the bus and smashing its windows, before finally throwing Molotov cocktails at the vehicle, causing an explosion and a massive fire. Three water cannons were dispatched to the scene to tackle the blaze. No one was injured in the incident. (<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rt.com/news/354525-france-bus-smashing-torching/">source</a>)</blockquote></div>

anonymous armageddon isis islam war Muslim Throws Molotov Cocktail Into Public Bus In France And Burns It To The Ground In The Middle Of The Street, Screams 'Allahu Akbar' While Doing It

The Media tried to cover up the whole incident, but thanks to phones and cameras it is impossible to hide the evil things these Muslim...