ANONYMOUS - OUR VOICE

UK Government Wants to Ban WhatsApp and All Other Encrypted Communications

The U.K. government is eager to expand already extensive spying powers to ban iMessage, Whatsapp, and Snapchat because the government cannot bypass their encryption features. The proposed ban was added to a revived version of a previously repealed British surveillance bill.
Cameron first indicated his advocacy of the ban following the Charlie Hebdo attack in Paris in January, justifying it by <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/whatsapp-and-snapchat-could-be-banned-under-new-surveillance-plans-9973035.html" target="_blank">asking</a>—without a hint of embarrassment—“In our country, do we want to allow a means of communication between people which […] we cannot read?” He quickly answered his own question: “‘No, we must not.’”
Cameron’s suggestion was part of a larger push to revive the sweeping Communications Data Bill, which detractors commonly refer to as the “Snooper’s Charter.”
By May, the government had announced it would introduce an investigatory powers bill that extended the powers granted in the Communications Data Bill andstrengthened the government’s ability to engage in bulk data collection. The Home Office claimedit would “better equip law enforcement and intelligence agencies to meet their key operational requirements” by allowing them to monitor communications more invasively.
Now, the bill is pushing forward. It includes a provision to ban WhatsApp, iMessage, and Snapchat “to stop people from sending any form of encrypted messages.” The bill also requires internet companies to keep full records of all communications on their platforms. This includes Facebook and Google, which would be required to hand over whatever information the government wants, when it wants it.
In arguing in favor of the expanded powers, Cameron said, “We have always been able, on the authority of the Home Secretary, to sign a warrant and intercept a phone call, a mobile phone call or other media communications.”According to Big Brother Watch, British police file a request for communications data every two minutes. Their requests are granted 96% of the time by the Home Office, a rate almost as high as that of American “rubber stamp” FISA courts. Like Cameron, American officials have criticized encryption as a danger to national security.
By banning all forms of communication exempt from government surveillance, the U.K. government is straddling a dangerous line between “national security,” as it claims to bolster, and the basic privacy rights of its citizens. Many would argue it has long since crossed that line, as intensive surveillance measures have been in place for years. Cameronpontificated this week that “…the question we must ask ourselves is whether, as technology develops, we are content to leave a safe space – a new means of communication – for terrorists to communicate with each other.”
Not everyone in the U.K. agrees with the prime minister’s privacy-versus-security dichotomy. “We take no issue with the use of intrusive surveillance powers per se – targeted surveillance can play an important part in preventing and detecting serious crime,” said Liberty, a human rights and civil liberties advocacy group in the U.K. “But the current regime just doesn’t provide sufficient safeguards to ensure that such surveillance is conducted lawfully, and in a necessary and proportionate way.”
Former Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, who helped to block the previous version of the Communications Data Bill when he was in office, echoed a similar sentiment about the impending new policy.
“It’s not harmless. It would be a new and dramatic shift in the relationship between the state and the individual,” he said.
“People who blithely say they are happy for their communications to be open to scrutiny because they have ‘nothing to hide’ have failed to grasp something fundamental about open democratic societies: We do not make ourselves safer by making ourselves less free.”
Conservatives in Parliament are expected to pass the bill (previously killed by liberal Democrats in the previous administration) with enforcement as early as 2016, even as computing experts warn the policies may enable the very terrorists they are intended to thwart.
By <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CareyWedler/" target="_blank">Carey Wedler</a>
(<a href="http://theantimedia.org/">ANTIMEDIA</a>)
<div style="display: block !important; margin:0 !important; padding: 0 !important" id="wpsclp_locker_post_end_element"></div>
-- Delivered by <a href="http://feed43.com/">Feed43</a> service

anon anonymous news UK Government Wants to Ban WhatsApp and All Other Encrypted Communications

The U.K. government is eager to expand already extensive spying powers to ban iMessage, Whatsapp, and Snapchat because the government can...

Researchers confirm: The Largest Pyramid in Mexico has been found

Researchers in Mexico have discovered a Pyramid that, according to initial measurements, is larger than the Great Pyramid of the Sun in Teotihuacan.
Initial excavations were done in 2010.
The Pyramid, 75 meters in height, was explored by specialists from the National Institute of Anthropology and History (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instituto_Nacional_de_Antropolog%C3%ADa_e_Historia" target="_blank">INAH</a>) on the acropolis of Tonina, Chiapas, estimated to be around 1700 years old.
Emiliano Gallaga, director of the archaeological zone, explained that work has been done in the last two years, and by means of a three-dimensional.
Researchers verified that in the northeastern part of the site, stands one of the largest construction in Mesoamerica, comparable in size only to great Mayan cities like Tikal and El Mirador in Guatemala.
<img alt="The-Largest-Pyramid-in-Mexico-has-been-found-2" class="aligncenter wp-image-19829" height="521" src="http://csglobe.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/The-Largest-Pyramid-in-Mexico-has-been-found-2.jpg" width="439" />
See also: <a href="http://csglobe.com/pyramids-of-antarctica-a-certain-possibility-below-the-snow/" target="_blank">Pyramids Of Antarctica: A Certain Possibility Below The Snow !?</a>
Another features which makes this “unique” pre-hispanic structure stand out are the seven platforms which integrate it and were specific spaces intended to serve as palaces, temples, housing and administrative units.
It is a unique structure for various specific functions within the social, political, economic and religious structure, which is not repeated in any other archaeological site of the Mayan world stated researchers from INAH.
“It’s a big surprise to see that the pyramid was done almost entirely by pre-Hispanic architects and therefore is more artificial than natural.“
This is because it was believed that the entire structure was a natural hill, but recent evidence has revealed that the structure was almost entirely built by ancient inhabitants.
<img alt="The-Largest-Pyramid-in-Mexico-has-been-found" class="aligncenter wp-image-19828" height="232" src="http://csglobe.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/The-Largest-Pyramid-in-Mexico-has-been-found.jpg" width="455" />
Archaeologists added that the pyramid is bigger than we had anticipated. The structure is connected by roads located on top of surrounding elevations.
Gallaga added that, after all of the information, we can confirm that this pyramid exceeds in height the pyramid of the Sun at Teotihuacan which measures 65 meters.
INAH researchers have determined that the city center had an architectural continuity between 10 and 12 hectares, which is the double of what was previously thought and mainly corresponds to the south facade of the Acropolis, one of the most important Mayan areas known to researchers.
<hr />
Via:<a href="http://csglobe.com/researchers-confirm-the-largest-pyramid-in-mexico-has-been-found/"> </a> <a href="http://csglobe.com/researchers-confirm-the-largest-pyramid-in-mexico-has-been-found/">csglobe.com</a>
<div style="display: block !important; margin:0 !important; padding: 0 !important" id="wpsclp_locker_post_end_element"></div>
-- Delivered by <a href="http://feed43.com/">Feed43</a> service

anon anonymous news Researchers confirm: The Largest Pyramid in Mexico has been found

Researchers in Mexico have discovered a Pyramid that, according to initial measurements, is larger than the Great Pyramid of the Sun in Teot...

Satanic Illuminati Church Infiltration Exposed

<img alt="Pope Francis Romanus Jesuit -- Illuminati Satanist -- Child Trafficking and Genocide" class="" height="271" src="http://worldtruth.tv/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Pope-Francis-Romanus-Jesuit-Illuminati-Satanist-Child-Trafficking-and-Genocide-e1436709358723.jpg" width="481" />
Throughout my years I’ve visited a lot of churches, and none spoke hardcore gospel except maybe one, or two. Many churches I’ve been to openly use masonic symbols on their church pamphlets/logos. They preach watered down sermons, and use the Bible as a tool for control, not as a tool for salvation. If you want to know if your pastor is a freemason simply ask him about the illuminati. If he denies it exists, refuses to talk about it, or says he knows nothing about it then you need to leave that church. A real pastor knows how late the hour is, and is aware of the evil in this country. A fake pastor will avoid the topic altogether.
 
<center><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/lrlJojCbtNo" width="498" height="280" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></center>
<center><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrlJojCbtNo" target="_blank">source</a></center>
<div style="display: block !important; margin:0 !important; padding: 0 !important" id="wpsclp_locker_post_end_element"></div>
-- Delivered by <a href="http://feed43.com/">Feed43</a> service

anon anonymous news Satanic Illuminati Church Infiltration Exposed

Throughout my years I’ve visited a lot of churches, and none spoke hardcore gospel except maybe one, or two. Many churches I’ve been to ope...

SHOCKING TOTALLY SHOCKING !!! ( 1 ) Prepare for what is coming ?.

anon anonymous news SHOCKING TOTALLY SHOCKING !!! ( 1 ) Prepare for what is coming ?.

What has been hidden from you, like in places like Dulce , Are the things your nightmares are made from. These creatures were on the ear...

The Illuminati know what is coming September 22-28, 2015 (part 1 of 4)

anon anonymous news The Illuminati know what is coming September 22-28, 2015 (part 1 of 4)

In this 4-part series, I take a look at some of the movies, TV shows, advertisements and other signs that are all pointing us to the time p...

UK Government Wants to Ban WhatsApp and All Other Encrypted Communications

The U.K. government is eager to expand already extensive spying powers to ban iMessage, Whatsapp, and Snapchat because the government cannot bypass their encryption features. The proposed ban was added to a revived version of a previously repealed British surveillance bill.
Cameron first indicated his advocacy of the ban following the Charlie Hebdo attack in Paris in January, justifying it by <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/whatsapp-and-snapchat-could-be-banned-under-new-surveillance-plans-9973035.html" target="_blank">asking</a>—without a hint of embarrassment—“In our country, do we want to allow a means of communication between people which […] we cannot read?” He quickly answered his own question: “‘<a href="http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/science-technology/590061/WhatsApp-UK-Ban-Weeks-Snoopers-Charter" target="_blank">No, we must not</a>.’”
Cameron’s suggestion was part of a larger push to revive the sweeping Communications Data Bill, which detractors commonly refer to as the “<a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/may/27/security-services-investigatory-powers-bill" target="_blank">Snooper’s Charter.</a>”
By May, the government <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/may/27/security-services-investigatory-powers-bill" target="_blank">had announced</a> it would introduce an investigatory powers bill that extended the powers granted in the Communications Data Bill and strengthened the government’s ability to engage in bulk data collection. The Home Office <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/may/27/security-services-investigatory-powers-bill" target="_blank">claimed</a> it would “better equip law enforcement and intelligence agencies to meet their key operational requirements” by allowing them to monitor communications more invasively.
Now, the bill is <a href="http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/science-technology/590061/WhatsApp-UK-Ban-Weeks-Snoopers-Charter" target="_blank">pushing forward</a>. It includes a provision to ban WhatsApp, iMessage, and Snapchat “to stop people from sending any form of encrypted messages.” The bill also requires internet companies to keep full records of all communications on their platforms. This includes Facebook and Google, which would be required to hand over whatever information the government wants, when it wants it.
In arguing in favor of the expanded powers, Cameron <a href="http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/science-technology/590061/WhatsApp-UK-Ban-Weeks-Snoopers-Charter" target="_blank">said</a>, “We have always been able, on the authority of the Home Secretary, to sign a warrant and intercept a phone call, a <a href="http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/science-technology/590061/WhatsApp-UK-Ban-Weeks-Snoopers-Charter#" target="_blank">mobile phone</a> call or other media communications.” <a href="http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-32958632" target="_blank">According to Big Brother Watch</a>, British police file a request for communications data every two minutes. Their requests are granted 96% of the time by the Home Office, a <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/06/fisa-court-nsa-spying-opinion-reject-request" target="_blank">rate almost as high</a> as that of American “rubber stamp” FISA courts. Like Cameron, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/oct/16/fbi-director-attacks-tech-companies-encryption" target="_blank">American officials have criticized encryption</a> as a danger to national security.
By banning all forms of communication exempt from government surveillance, the U.K. government is straddling a dangerous line between “national security,” as it claims to bolster, and the basic privacy rights of its citizens. Many would argue it has long since crossed that line, as intensive surveillance measures have <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_politics/7671046.stm" target="_blank">been in place for years</a>. Cameron <a href="http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/science-technology/590061/WhatsApp-UK-Ban-Weeks-Snoopers-Charter" target="_blank">pontificated</a> this week that “…the question we must ask ourselves is whether, as technology develops, we are content to leave a safe space – a new means of communication – for terrorists to communicate with each other.”
Not everyone in the U.K. agrees with the prime minister’s privacy-versus-security dichotomy. “We take no issue with the use of intrusive surveillance powers per se – targeted surveillance can play an important part in preventing and detecting serious crime,” said Liberty, a human rights and civil liberties advocacy group in the U.K. “But the current regime just doesn’t provide sufficient safeguards to ensure that such surveillance is conducted lawfully, and in a necessary and proportionate way.”
Former Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, who helped to block the previous version of the Communications Data Bill when he was in office, echoed a similar sentiment about the impending new policy.
“It’s not harmless. It would be a new and dramatic shift in the relationship between the state and the individual,” he said.
“People who blithely say they are happy for their communications to be open to scrutiny because they have ‘nothing to hide’ have failed to grasp something fundamental about open democratic societies: We do not make ourselves safer by making ourselves less free.”
Conservatives in Parliament are expected to pass the bill (<a href="http://metro.co.uk/2015/07/10/whatsapp-snapchat-and-imessage-could-be-banned-under-new-laws-5289099/" target="_blank">previously killed by liberal Democrats</a> in the previous administration) with enforcement as early as 2016, even as <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/uk-governments-surveillance-plans-could-put-citizens-and-entire-internet-at-risk-argue-leading-computing-experts-10373940.html" target="_blank">computing experts warn</a> the policies may enable the very terrorists they are intended to thwart.
<hr />
-- Delivered by <a href="http://feed43.com/">Feed43</a> service

media politics usa UK Government Wants to Ban WhatsApp and All Other Encrypted Communications

The U.K. government is eager to expand already extensive spying powers to ban iMessage, Whatsapp, and Snapchat because the government cannot...